Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CULT | TŐKÉS László ( PPE) | ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína ( S&D), VATTIMO Gianni ( ALDE), BENARAB-ATTOU Malika ( Verts/ALE), MIGALSKI Marek Henryk ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 464 votes to 34 with 33 abstentions, a resolution on modernising Europe’s higher education systems.
Parliament recalls that the Europe 2020 Strategy states that, by 2020, 40 % of 30-34-year-olds in Europe should complete higher education or equivalent studies. However, in 2010 only 26 % of the workforce in the EU had attained this qualification level.
Parliament also stressed that in the EU in 2010, unemployment of tertiary education graduates stood at 5.4 % compared with more than 15 % among those with only lower secondary education showing that it is taking longer and longer for the majority of those graduates to find secure employment. It is also noted that 75 of the top 200 universities worldwide are to be found in the EU Member States but only 200 of Europe’s 4 000 higher education institutions rank among the top 500 in the world. This situation should be improved since more than 21 % of young people in the EU are unemployed.
The changing role of higher education institutions : recalling its resolution on the contribution of the European institutions to the consolidation and progress of the Bologna process, Parliament calls on higher education institutions to integrate lifelong learning into their curricula, with the help of economic assistance and different study programmes, and to adapt to a student base that includes adults, elderly people, non-traditional learners, full-time students who have to work while studying and people with disabilities. They therefore call on higher education institutions to implement programmes aimed at removing existing obstacles and barriers.
Higher education institutions should take into account the needs of professionals who need, as lifelong learners, to update and broaden their skills at regular intervals , including through the organisation and fine-tuning of update courses. They are called upon to uphold the spirit of autonomy in teaching and research.
Parliament calls on Member States, regional and local governments and higher education institutions to strengthen their efforts to widen equitable access to studies for all , irrespective of sex, ethnicity, language, religion, disability or social background, and to fight all forms of discrimination, recognising multiculturalism and multilingualism, including sign languages, as fundamental values of the EU that need to be fostered. Student participation in sports should also be encouraged.
Moreover, the education institutions should:
· emphasise the importance of promoting democratic values, while stressing the need to acquire a sound knowledge of European integration and ensuring that Europe’s former totalitarian regimes are understood as part of its common history;
· not permit the education system to be totally subordinated to the labour market, in view of the need to shape ethical and moral values among students;
· establish a general framework – covering rules, responsibilities, political and educational objectives and the quality of, and priority given to, training and research – in which to promote best practices and respond to the challenges of the communication society;
· emphasise that academic staff and students, as well as their organisations and associations, need to be involved in the modernisation of higher education institutions.
Parliament underlines the complementary role of state, private and religious forms of higher education across Europe.
Information about higher education institutions : Parliament proposes the introduction of clear and uniform criteria for the creation of pan-European rankings of higher education institutions, thereby allowing prospective students to make an informed choice of university and providing comprehensive information about the respective universities. It supports the Commission’s initiative to launch, in cooperation with all the institutions, students and other stakeholders involved, a multi-dimensional tool for the differentiated classification and ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as a long tradition of providing higher education in Europe, the quality of teaching, student support (i.e. scholarships, counselling, housing), physical and info-communication accessibility, regional engagement and knowledge transfer. On the other hand, it opposes the establishment of a classification of higher education institutions on the basis of non-homogeneous performance indicators which do not take into account the diversity of educational pathways, programmes and linguistic diversity in European universities.
Funding higher education systems : Parliament stresses that higher education is a public good that fosters culture, diversity, democratic values and personal development and prepares students to become active citizens who will support European cohesion. It insists once again that Member States should reach the target of investing 2 % of GDP in education . Members consider that mainly public and also private funding is of primary importance for the modernisation of higher education systems and emphasise that investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis.
Member States and higher education institutions are called upon to expand scholarship and funding programmes for those institutions and to develop innovative methods of funding mechanisms which can contribute to more efficient functioning of higher education institutions, complement public funding without increasing the pressure on households and make higher education accessible to all. Parliament expresses regret at the significant cutbacks to education budgets in several Member States, as well as the constant increase in education fees, which is leading to a significant increase in the number of vulnerable students.
As EU level, Parliament calls for the EU budget for 2014-2020 under the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund to include spending on higher education related to investments in university infrastructure and academic staff.
The transition from higher education to the labour market : Parliament calls on higher education institutions to adapt to new challenges by creating new fields of study that reflect the needs of the labour market, taking into account the development of science and technology by maintaining an appropriate balance between theoretical knowledge and practical skills. It urges the Commission to present its proposal for a quality framework for traineeships.
Parliament calls on higher education institutions and institutions responsible for the education sector to monitor trends in labour market requirements in order to reflect more accurately future needs in terms of learning opportunities. There is a need to track graduates’ employment outcomes to measure how well higher education responds to labour market demands. Members welcome the Commission’s commitment to improving the availability of such data, with the principal aim of providing students with the necessary information to guide their study choices, while at the same time giving higher education and research institutions the necessary information to identify and, subsequently, develop programmes of study covering both general knowledge and specific professional skills through lifelong learning.
Other measures are called for, such as:
· to collect and publish statistical data regarding the correlation between different higher education degrees and employment opportunities;
· to develop an international databank, similar to AlmaLaurea, which helps graduates to identify suitable job, training, study and research opportunities;
· to increase the provision of support and guidance for students entering the labour market.
Gender balance in higher education : faced with existing gender disparities in European education systems, Parliament calls for measures to combat persistent stereotypes in training. Recalling that women are more often overqualified and underpaid for their jobs and often end up unemployed or in casual jobs, it calls for measures to combat this situation.
It also suggests:
· developing initiatives to provide information about gender equality and promote gender equality in education;
· that teachers should receive specific training on equality between men and women;
· that women learners may have specific additional responsibilities outside of learning which should be recognised such as caring for young children or elderly relatives;
· the need for educational institutions to supply parents – especially women – with a sufficient quantity of high-quality, affordable and accessible childcare, including community centres, so as to facilitate their equal participation in studies and research;
· the introduction of a greater variety of study modes, such as part-time and distance learning.
Higher education institutions : Parliament encourages higher education institutions to engage more intensively with their regions and establish dynamic collaborative actions with regional governments, local councils, public bodies, non-governmental organisations and small and medium-sized enterprises to enhance regional development. It points out that this should also strengthen interaction between higher education institutions and employers.
It calls specifically on the Member States and their central and regional authorities, the Commission and the business world to:
· include and support higher education institutions in cross-border cooperation;
· intensify the interaction between the sides of the knowledge triangle (education, research, innovation) as a key element for growth and job creation;
· develop partnerships with higher education institutions by providing high-quality internships for students and lecturers and capitalising on lecturers’ general transferable skills.
Members call for a commitment to more flexible and innovative learning approaches and to delivery methods that are always centred on students' needs.
Parliament stresses the need for cross-border higher education institutions and enterprises to cooperate in practical programmes and in shaping students’ future careers by (i) identifying the specific development pathways, expectations and challenges that will await them in the labour market; (ii) developing mechanisms and management strategies that facilitate the transfer of innovative ideas and research results into society and business.
Members reaffirm the value of democratic governance as a fundamental way to ensure academic freedom and promote active participation by all actors in the life of a higher education institution. It also emphasises that the principle of democracy and self-governance among higher education institutions and their staff and students should be respected and maintained in all collaborative projects. It emphasises the importance of cooperation between higher education institutions and NGOs and the European voluntary sector, in order to promote active citizenship and involve students in active participation through working for the NGO sector.
Member States are called upon to support and encourage:
· the importance of sport in the education process;
· the importance of culture in higher education and calls for the inclusion of special criteria for the humanities in both innovation and research;
· student initiatives, as well as assisting in the coordination of such activities among other higher education institutions, enterprises and local authorities from various Member States.
Mutual recognition of qualifications : Parliament calls on the Member States and these institutions to develop clear, integrated pathways that allow learners to progress from other types of education into higher education and to change between different tracks and types of institutions. It emphasises, however, the need to maintain the diversity of educational pathways and programmes, teaching methods and university systems in the EU. Members take the view that it is consequently necessary to develop a national qualification framework, while at the same time promoting the mutual recognition of degrees and qualifications across all Member States.
All EU countries are urged to implement the national qualification frameworks linked to the EHEA Qualifications Framework and to develop, and provide financial support for, mutual recognition. In this context, Members stress the need to strengthen student mobility through Erasmus and for the home university to recognise qualifications acquired while studying at other universities.
Parliament supports the Commission’s proposal to improve recognition of study undertaken abroad.
Enhancing mobility in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and beyond : Parliament stresses that greater coordination among Member States in the field of higher education – including through strong financial and political support for agreements on common core curricula and well-defined learning outcomes – is a prerequisite for achieving the goals of employability and growth in Europe. It points out the need for collaboration between the EHEA and the European Research Area (ERA) as a means to support university research programmes in both science and the humanities.
Parliament calls for the mobility at staff and student level be strengthened, in particular with the countries which are covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) or which directly border the EU in order to turn the EHEA into a magnet for training and knowledge that is both macroregional and global, particularly in relation to exchange and professional training programmes.
It calls on the Commission to propose the creation of Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus and Leonardi da Vinci programmes, aimed at promoting transnational mobility among students from both sides of the Mediterranean. Members call for the opening of mobility, exchange, research and work experience programmes to students from countries affiliated to the Eastern Partnership. They emphasise the need for the higher education system in each Member State to provide higher-quality teaching so that increased mobility opportunities for students do not go hand in hand with a worsening of the ‘brain drain’, which is now a genuine social problem in some Member States.
Lastly, Parliament calls for:
· the reinforcement of language and sign language teaching
· the abolition of differences between western and central-eastern European higher education systems, with a view to encouraging and supporting cross-border collaboration between higher education institutions;
· the evaluation of the possibility of promoting, within the study cycle, a compulsory training period at a university in a Member State other than the one to which the student is affiliated;
· the strengthening of the principle that loan schemes cannot substitute the grant systems put in place to support access to education for all students regardless of their social background.
The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report by László TŐKÉS (EPP, RO) on modernising Europe’s higher education systems.
The report recalls that the Europe 2020 Strategy states that, by 2020, 40 % of 30-34-year-olds in Europe should complete higher education or equivalent studies. However, that in 2010 only 26 % of the workforce in the EU had attained this qualification level.
Members stressed that in the EU in 2010, unemployment of tertiary education graduates stood at 5.4 % compared with more than 15 % among those with only lower secondary education showing that it is taking longer and longer for the majority of those graduates to find secure employment. It is also noted that 75 of the top 200 universities worldwide are to be found in the EU Member States but only 200 of Europe’s 4 000 higher education institutions rank among the top 500 in the world. This situation should be improved. In this regard, the creation of a European Higher Education Area (EHEA) is a significant development that could contribute to European integration while respecting the diversity of education in the various EU Member States and the goals of higher education in relation to society.
The changing role of higher education institutions : Members call on higher education institutions to integrate lifelong learning into their curricula, with the help of economic assistance and different study programmes, and to adapt to a student base that includes adults, elderly people, non-traditional learners, full-time students who have to work while studying and people with disabilities. They therefore call on higher education institutions to implement programmes aimed at removing existing obstacles and barriers .
Higher education institutions should take into account the needs of professionals who need, as lifelong learners, to update and broaden their skills at regular intervals, including through the organisation and fine-tuning of update courses. They are called upon to uphold the spirit of autonomy in teaching and research.
The report calls on Member States, regional and local governments and higher education institutions to strengthen – inter alia through the development of adequate financial support schemes – their efforts to widen equitable access to studies for all , from early childhood to higher education, irrespective of sex, ethnicity, language, religion, disability or social background, and to fight all forms of discrimination, recognising multiculturalism and multilingualism, including sign languages, as fundamental values of the EU that need to be fostered. Student participation in sports should also be encouraged.
Moreover, the education institutions should:
emphasise the importance of promoting democratic values, while stressing the need to acquire a sound knowledge of European integration and ensuring that Europe’s former totalitarian regimes are understood as part of its common history; not permit the education system to be totally subordinated to the labour market, in view of the need to shape ethical and moral values among students; establish a general framework – covering rules, responsibilities, political and educational objectives and the quality of, and priority given to, training and research – in which to promote best practices and respond to the challenges of the communication society; emphasise that academic staff and students, as well as their organisations and associations, need to be involved in the modernisation of higher education institutions.
Information about higher education institutions : Members propose the introduction of clear and uniform criteria for the creation of pan-European rankings of higher education institutions, thereby allowing prospective students to make an informed choice of university and providing comprehensive information about the respective universities. They support the Commission’s initiative to launch, in cooperation with all the institutions, students and other stakeholders involved, a multi-dimensional tool for the differentiated classification and ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as a long tradition of providing higher education in Europe, the quality of teaching, student support (i.e. scholarships, counselling, housing), physical and info-communication accessibility, regional engagement and knowledge transfer. On the other hand, they oppose the establishment of a classification of higher education institutions on the basis of non-homogeneous performance indicators which do not take into account the diversity of educational pathways, programmes and linguistic diversity in European universities.
Funding higher education systems : the report stresses that higher education is a public good that fosters culture, diversity, democratic values and personal development and prepares students to become active citizens who will support European cohesion. It insists once again that Member States should reach the target of investing 2 % of GDP in education . Members consider that mainly public and also private funding is of primary importance for the modernisation of higher education systems and emphasise that investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis.
The Member States and higher education institutions are called upon to expand scholarship and funding programmes for those institutions and to develop innovative methods of funding mechanisms which can contribute to more efficient functioning of higher education institutions, complement public funding without increasing the pressure on households and make higher education accessible to all. Members express regret at the significant cutbacks to education budgets in several Member States, as well as the constant increase in education fees, which is leading to a significant increase in the number of vulnerable students.
As EU level, Members call for the EU budget for 2014-2020 under the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund to include spending on higher education related to investments in university infrastructure and academic staff.
The transition from higher education to the labour market : Members call on higher education institutions to adapt to new challenges by creating new fields of study that reflect the needs of the labour market, taking into account the development of science and technology by maintaining an appropriate balance between theoretical knowledge and practical skills. They urge the Commission to present its proposal for a quality framework for traineeships .
The report calls on higher education institutions and institutions responsible for the education sector at regional, national and European level to monitor trends in labour market requirements in order to reflect more accurately future needs in terms of learning opportunities. There is a need to track graduates’ employment outcomes to measure how well higher education responds to labour market demands. Members welcome the Commission’s commitment to improving the availability of such data, with the principal aim of providing students with the necessary information to guide their study choices, while at the same time giving higher education and research institutions the necessary information to identify and, subsequently, develop programmes of study covering both general knowledge and specific professional skills through lifelong learning .
Other measures are called for, such as:
to collect and publish statistical data regarding the correlation between different higher education degrees and employment opportunities; to develop an international databank, similar to AlmaLaurea, which helps graduates to identify suitable job, training, study and research opportunities; to increase the provision of support and guidance for students entering the labour market.
Gender balance in higher education : faced with existing gender disparities in European education systems, Members call for measures to combat persistent stereotypes in training. Recalling that women are more often overqualified and underpaid for their jobs and often end up unemployed or in casual jobs, the report calls for measures to combat this situation.
It also suggests:
developing initiatives to provide information about gender equality and promote gender equality in education; that teachers should receive specific training on equality between men and women; that women learners may have specific additional responsibilities outside of learning which should be recognised such as caring for young children or elderly relatives; the need for educational institutions to supply parents – especially women – with a sufficient quantity of high-quality, affordable and accessible childcare, including community centres, so as to facilitate their equal participation in studies and research; the introduction of a greater variety of study modes, such as part-time and distance learning.
Engaged higher education institutions : Members encourage higher education institutions to engage more intensively with their regions and establish dynamic collaborative actions with regional governments, local councils, public bodies, non-governmental organisations and small and medium-sized enterprises to enhance regional development; points out that this should also strengthen interaction between higher education institutions and employers.
They call specifically on the Member States and their central and regional authorities, the Commission and the business world to:
include and support higher education institutions in cross-border cooperation; intensify the interaction between the sides of the knowledge triangle (education, research, innovation) as a key element for growth and job creation; develop partnerships with higher education institutions by providing high-quality internships for students and lecturers and capitalising on lecturers’ general transferable skills.
Members call for a commitment to more flexible and innovative learning approaches and to delivery methods which are always centred on students' needs.
The report notes the need for cross-border higher education institutions and enterprises to cooperate in practical programmes and in shaping students’ future careers by identifying the specific development pathways, expectations and challenges that will await them in the labour market. It also emphasises the usefulness of developing mechanisms and management strategies that facilitate the transfer of innovative ideas and research results into society and business.
Members reaffirm the value of democratic governance as a fundamental way to ensure academic freedom and promote active participation by all actors in the life of a higher education institution. It also emphasises that the principle of democracy and self-governance among higher education institutions and their staff and students should be respected and maintained in all collaborative projects. It emphasises the importance of cooperation between higher education institutions and NGOs and the European voluntary sector, in order to promote active citizenship and involve students in active participation through working for the NGO sector.
Member States are called upon to support and encourage:
the importance of sport in the education process; the importance of culture in higher education and calls for the inclusion of special criteria for the humanities in both innovation and research; student initiatives, as well as assisting in the coordination of such activities among other higher education institutions, enterprises and local authorities from various Member States.
Mutual recognition of qualifications : the report calls on the Member States and these institutions to develop clear, integrated pathways that allow learners to progress from other types of education into higher education and to change between different tracks and types of institutions. It emphasises, however, the need to maintain the diversity of educational pathways and programmes , teaching methods and university systems in the EU. Members take the view that it is consequently necessary to develop a national qualification framework, while at the same time promoting the mutual recognition of degrees and qualifications across all Member States.
All EU countries are urged to implement the national qualification frameworks linked to the EHEA Qualifications Framework and to develop, and provide financial support for, mutual recognition. In this context, Members stress the need to strengthen student mobility through Erasmus and for the the home university to recognise qualifications acquired while studying at other universities.
Members support the Commission’s proposal to improve recognition of study undertaken abroad.
Enhancing mobility in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and beyond : Members stress that greater coordination among Member States in the field of higher education – including through strong financial and political support for agreements on common core curricula and well-defined learning outcomes – is a prerequisite for achieving the goals of employability and growth in Europe. They point out the need for collaboration between the EHEA and the European Research Area (ERA) as a means to support university research programmes in both science and the humanities.
The report calls for the mobility at staff and student level be strengthened, in particular with the countries which are covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) or which directly border the EU. It calls on the Commission to propose the creation of Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus and Leonardi da Vinci programmes , aimed at promoting transnational mobility among students from both sides of the Mediterranean. Members call for the opening of mobility, exchange, research and work experience programmes to students from countries affiliated to the Eastern Partnership. They emphasise the need for the higher education system in each Member State to provide higher-quality teaching so that increased mobility opportunities for students do not go hand in hand with a worsening of the ‘ brain drain’ , which is now a genuine social problem in some Member States.
Lastly, Members call for:
the abolition of differences between western and central-eastern European higher education systems, with a view to encouraging and supporting cross-border collaboration between higher education institutions; the evaluation of the possibility of promoting, within the study cycle, a compulsory training period at a university in a Member State other than the one to which the student is affiliated; the strengthening of the principle that loan schemes cannot substitute the grant systems put in place to support access to education for all students regardless of their social background; further clarification of the proposal to create a financial instrument to help students secure funding for a Masters degree outside their home Member State.
PURPOSE: to propose a general framework to ensure the modernisation of higher education systems in Europe.
BACKGROUND: the Europe 2020 strategy, its Flagship Initiatives and the new Integrated Guidelines put knowledge at the heart of the Union’s efforts for achieving smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; the Commission’s proposal for the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 supports this strategy with a significant increase in the budget devoted to investment in education, research and innovation. This is because education, and in particular higher education and its links with research and innovation, plays a crucial role in individual and societal advancement, and in providing the highly skilled human capital and the articulate citizens that Europe needs to create jobs, economic growth and prosperity. Higher education institutions are thus crucial partners in delivering the European Union's strategy to drive forward and maintain growth.
Despite a challenging employment climate in the wake of the economic crisis, higher education represents a sound choice. Yet, the potential of European higher education institutions to fulfil their role in society and contribute to Europe's prosperity remains underexploited. While 35% of all jobs in the EU will require high-level qualifications by 2020, o nly 26% of the workforce currently has a higher education qualification . The EU still lags behind in the share of researchers in the total labour force: 6 per 100, compared to 9 in the US and 11 in Japan.
The main responsibility for delivering reforms in higher education rests with Member States and education institutions themselves. However, the Bologna Process, the EU Agenda for the modernisation of universities and the creation of the European Research Area show that the challenges and policy responses transcend national borders.
CONTENT: in order to maximise the contribution of Europe's higher education systems to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, reforms are needed in key areas:
to increase the quantity of higher education graduates at all levels; to enhance the quality and relevance of human capital development in higher education; to create effective governance and funding mechanisms in support of excellence; and to strengthen the knowledge triangle between education, research and business; the international mobility of students, researchers and staff as well as the growing internationalisation of higher education, have a strong impact on quality and affect each of these key areas.
The Communication identifies key policy issues for Member States and higher education institutions seeking to maximise their contribution to Europe’s growth and jobs. It also presents specific actions that the EU will take, bringing its added value to support the modernisation efforts of public authorities and institutions.
Measures proposed at EU level : the EU should make better use of the policy tools available in the field of higher education, in particular the European cooperation framework in education and training 'ET2020'. The Commission can support transparency and excellence through evidence-based policy analysis. It can support mobility of learners, teachers and researchers. It can support strategic cooperation between European institutions, and, in a context of increasing global competition for talent, provide a common framework to support the interaction of European higher education with the rest of the world .
As concerns funding, the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 will offer an opportunity to ensure that EU instruments and policies – particularly education, research, employment, entrepreneurship, migration and Cohesion – work together effectively to support the modernisation of higher education. The Commission, in focussing EU spending closely on the priorities of the Europe 2020 Strategy and on the key drivers of growth and jobs, has proposed a substantial increase in the budgets for education programmes and for research.
The kep policy issues may be summarised as follows:
(1) Improving data : the European Commission will:
launch U-Multirank: a new performance-based ranking and information tool for profiling higher education institutions, aiming to radically improve the transparency of the higher education sector, with first results in 2013. By moving beyond the research focus of current rankings and performance indicators, and by allowing users to create individualised multidimensional rankings, this independently run tool will inform choice and decision-making by all higher education stakeholders; in co-operation with Eurostat, improve data on European higher education learning mobility and employment outcomes, and work towards a European Tertiary Education Register; provide specific guidance and recommendations on raising basic and transversal skills and overcoming skill mismatches; in cooperation with Member States and stakeholders, analyse the impact of different funding approaches on the diversification, efficiency and equity of higher education systems, as well as on student mobility.
(2) Promoting mobility : the European Commission will:
improve the recognition of studies abroad, by strengthening the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS), proposing incentives in EU programmes to improve implementation, and working through the Bologna Process; propose an Erasmus Masters Degree Mobility Scheme (through a European-level student loan guarantee facility), operational from 2014, to promote mobility, excellence and access to affordable finance for students taking their Masters degree in another Member State regardless of their social background; in the context of the EHEA, contribute to strengthening synergies between the EU and intergovernmental processe; support the analysis of the potential of student mobility flows, including within the Bologna process, to take into account the judgements of the European Court of Justice, and of Quality Assurance standards to support the quality of franchise education; promote the European Framework for Research Careers to foster cross-border researcher mobility, helping researchers to identify job offers and employers to find suitable candidates, profiling research posts according to four levels of competence.
(3) Supporting the internationalisation of European higher education : the Commission will:
promote the EU as a study and research destination for top talent from around the world, by supporting the establishment and development of internationalisation strategies by Europe’s higher education institutions; develop relations on higher education with partners beyond the Union; make use of existing Mobility Partnerships to enhance and facilitate exchanges of students and researchers;
consider proposing amendments to the students and researchers Directives, to make the EU even more attractive to talent from non-EU countries, and examine whether the processes and the accompanying rights should be facilitated and/or strengthened; strengthen the tracking of non-EU doctoral students as a percentage of all doctoral students, as indicated in the Performance Scorecard for Research and Innovation to measure the attractiveness of EU research and doctoral training to the rest of the world.
(4) Strengthening the long-term impact and complementarity of EU funding : EU investment in higher education is proposed to be channelled through three main funding mechanisms of the 2014-2020 MFF:
1. Education Europe: the single programme for education training and youth : to contribute to the Europe 2020 goals, the Commission will propose a single programme for education, training and youth, with simplified entry points and management. The programme will focus spending on priorities such as quality and innovation in teaching, enhanced links with the world of work, and better recognition of skills gained through mobility. It will contribute to the Bologna 20% mobility target.
2. Horizon 2020: the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation : the new Horizon 2020 programme will cover all relevant EU research and innovation funding currently provided through the Seventh Research Framework Programme, the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme and other EU innovation initiatives, such as the EIT.
3. Cohesion Policy instruments : in the 2007-2013 funding period, around €72.5 billion EU cohesion funding will be spent on education and training, and €60 billion on research and innovation. A strategic use of the EU's Cohesion Policy can significantly enhance the social, economic and territorial contribution of higher education. The European Regional Development Fund can invest in building or renovating higher education institutions, providing equipment and promoting digitalisation, and support incubators, spin-offs and other forms of university-business partnerships. The European Social Fund (ESF) can finance modernisation processes, increase participation and attainment particularly for students from under-represented backgrounds, enhance educational content and the match between programmes and labour market demand.
The MFF proposal for 2014-2020 allocates a minimum of €84 billion to the ESF, of which over €40 billion could be expected, based upon past experience, to be made available for education and training.
PURPOSE: to propose a general framework to ensure the modernisation of higher education systems in Europe.
BACKGROUND: the Europe 2020 strategy, its Flagship Initiatives and the new Integrated Guidelines put knowledge at the heart of the Union’s efforts for achieving smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; the Commission’s proposal for the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 supports this strategy with a significant increase in the budget devoted to investment in education, research and innovation. This is because education, and in particular higher education and its links with research and innovation, plays a crucial role in individual and societal advancement, and in providing the highly skilled human capital and the articulate citizens that Europe needs to create jobs, economic growth and prosperity. Higher education institutions are thus crucial partners in delivering the European Union's strategy to drive forward and maintain growth.
Despite a challenging employment climate in the wake of the economic crisis, higher education represents a sound choice. Yet, the potential of European higher education institutions to fulfil their role in society and contribute to Europe's prosperity remains underexploited. While 35% of all jobs in the EU will require high-level qualifications by 2020, o nly 26% of the workforce currently has a higher education qualification . The EU still lags behind in the share of researchers in the total labour force: 6 per 100, compared to 9 in the US and 11 in Japan.
The main responsibility for delivering reforms in higher education rests with Member States and education institutions themselves. However, the Bologna Process, the EU Agenda for the modernisation of universities and the creation of the European Research Area show that the challenges and policy responses transcend national borders.
CONTENT: in order to maximise the contribution of Europe's higher education systems to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, reforms are needed in key areas:
to increase the quantity of higher education graduates at all levels; to enhance the quality and relevance of human capital development in higher education; to create effective governance and funding mechanisms in support of excellence; and to strengthen the knowledge triangle between education, research and business; the international mobility of students, researchers and staff as well as the growing internationalisation of higher education, have a strong impact on quality and affect each of these key areas.
The Communication identifies key policy issues for Member States and higher education institutions seeking to maximise their contribution to Europe’s growth and jobs. It also presents specific actions that the EU will take, bringing its added value to support the modernisation efforts of public authorities and institutions.
Measures proposed at EU level : the EU should make better use of the policy tools available in the field of higher education, in particular the European cooperation framework in education and training 'ET2020'. The Commission can support transparency and excellence through evidence-based policy analysis. It can support mobility of learners, teachers and researchers. It can support strategic cooperation between European institutions, and, in a context of increasing global competition for talent, provide a common framework to support the interaction of European higher education with the rest of the world .
As concerns funding, the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 will offer an opportunity to ensure that EU instruments and policies – particularly education, research, employment, entrepreneurship, migration and Cohesion – work together effectively to support the modernisation of higher education. The Commission, in focussing EU spending closely on the priorities of the Europe 2020 Strategy and on the key drivers of growth and jobs, has proposed a substantial increase in the budgets for education programmes and for research.
The kep policy issues may be summarised as follows:
(1) Improving data : the European Commission will:
launch U-Multirank: a new performance-based ranking and information tool for profiling higher education institutions, aiming to radically improve the transparency of the higher education sector, with first results in 2013. By moving beyond the research focus of current rankings and performance indicators, and by allowing users to create individualised multidimensional rankings, this independently run tool will inform choice and decision-making by all higher education stakeholders; in co-operation with Eurostat, improve data on European higher education learning mobility and employment outcomes, and work towards a European Tertiary Education Register; provide specific guidance and recommendations on raising basic and transversal skills and overcoming skill mismatches; in cooperation with Member States and stakeholders, analyse the impact of different funding approaches on the diversification, efficiency and equity of higher education systems, as well as on student mobility.
(2) Promoting mobility : the European Commission will:
improve the recognition of studies abroad, by strengthening the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS), proposing incentives in EU programmes to improve implementation, and working through the Bologna Process; propose an Erasmus Masters Degree Mobility Scheme (through a European-level student loan guarantee facility), operational from 2014, to promote mobility, excellence and access to affordable finance for students taking their Masters degree in another Member State regardless of their social background; in the context of the EHEA, contribute to strengthening synergies between the EU and intergovernmental processe; support the analysis of the potential of student mobility flows, including within the Bologna process, to take into account the judgements of the European Court of Justice, and of Quality Assurance standards to support the quality of franchise education; promote the European Framework for Research Careers to foster cross-border researcher mobility, helping researchers to identify job offers and employers to find suitable candidates, profiling research posts according to four levels of competence.
(3) Supporting the internationalisation of European higher education : the Commission will:
promote the EU as a study and research destination for top talent from around the world, by supporting the establishment and development of internationalisation strategies by Europe’s higher education institutions; develop relations on higher education with partners beyond the Union; make use of existing Mobility Partnerships to enhance and facilitate exchanges of students and researchers;
consider proposing amendments to the students and researchers Directives, to make the EU even more attractive to talent from non-EU countries, and examine whether the processes and the accompanying rights should be facilitated and/or strengthened; strengthen the tracking of non-EU doctoral students as a percentage of all doctoral students, as indicated in the Performance Scorecard for Research and Innovation to measure the attractiveness of EU research and doctoral training to the rest of the world.
(4) Strengthening the long-term impact and complementarity of EU funding : EU investment in higher education is proposed to be channelled through three main funding mechanisms of the 2014-2020 MFF:
1. Education Europe: the single programme for education training and youth : to contribute to the Europe 2020 goals, the Commission will propose a single programme for education, training and youth, with simplified entry points and management. The programme will focus spending on priorities such as quality and innovation in teaching, enhanced links with the world of work, and better recognition of skills gained through mobility. It will contribute to the Bologna 20% mobility target.
2. Horizon 2020: the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation : the new Horizon 2020 programme will cover all relevant EU research and innovation funding currently provided through the Seventh Research Framework Programme, the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme and other EU innovation initiatives, such as the EIT.
3. Cohesion Policy instruments : in the 2007-2013 funding period, around €72.5 billion EU cohesion funding will be spent on education and training, and €60 billion on research and innovation. A strategic use of the EU's Cohesion Policy can significantly enhance the social, economic and territorial contribution of higher education. The European Regional Development Fund can invest in building or renovating higher education institutions, providing equipment and promoting digitalisation, and support incubators, spin-offs and other forms of university-business partnerships. The European Social Fund (ESF) can finance modernisation processes, increase participation and attainment particularly for students from under-represented backgrounds, enhance educational content and the match between programmes and labour market demand.
The MFF proposal for 2014-2020 allocates a minimum of €84 billion to the ESF, of which over €40 billion could be expected, based upon past experience, to be made available for education and training.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)487
- Contribution: COM(2011)0567
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0139/2012
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0057/2012
- Committee opinion: PE480.580
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.629
- Committee draft report: PE476.092
- Contribution: COM(2011)0567
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0567
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0567
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0567 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE476.092
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.629
- Committee opinion: PE480.580
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)487
- Contribution: COM(2011)0567
- Contribution: COM(2011)0567
Activities
- László TŐKÉS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Zoltán BAGÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Piotr BORYS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrea ČEŠKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore IACOLINO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaromír KOHLÍČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek Henryk MIGALSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csanád SZEGEDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Josef WEIDENHOLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Artur ZASADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
229 |
2011/2294(INI)
2012/02/02
CULT
180 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new) A c. whereas education is the responsibility of Member States and it is important to ensure financial support to higher education institutions, first and foremost, through the provision of adequate public funding;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Highlights that the mobility of students, and above all those studying at other universities under the Erasmus Programme influences the exchange of good practice, and through this the modernisation of higher education, therefore, notes the need for the recognition of qualifications acquired the home university whilst studying at other universities;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Member States to pay increased attention and to support higher education and institutions serving traditional national, ethnic or linguistic minorities with special focus on endangered cultures and languages;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Also emphasises the need to continue traditional education in an academic spirit, not to permit the total subordination of the education system to the labour market in view of the need to shape ethical and moral values among students at the same time as caring about academic progress;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Calls on higher education institutions to cooperate with authorities, businesses and communities to shape the richest and most diverse educational system such as will facilitate the realisation of the needs of the labour market, and ensure the personal development that students expect;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls for the promotion of best practices that help higher education institutions
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls for the promotion of best practices that help higher education institutions
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.Calls for the promotion of best practices that help higher education institutions react efficiently to changes in labour market demands and facilitate young people’s transition from higher education to the labour market and calls on Member States and higher education institutions to establish a general framework – rules, responsibilities, political and educational objectives, quality and priority of training and research – in which to promote best practices and to react to the challenges of the communication society;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on higher education institutions and institutions responsible for the education sector at regional, national and European level to monitor trends in labour market requirements in order to reflect more accurately the future needs of learning opportunities;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls for the higher education institutions to be opened up both to offer continuing vocational training and to establish appropriate courses for workers who have not attained an upper secondary educational qualification, so as to tap into additional potential to achieve the academic quota;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A d (new) A d. whereas the creation of a European Higher Education Area is a significant development that could contribute to European integration while respecting the diversity of education in the various EU Member States and the goals of higher education in relation to society; whereas the European Union has an important role to play in strengthening this area while drawing on the efforts and cooperation of Member States in this regard;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.Welcomes the quality framework for traineeships that the Commission intends to propose; emphasises the success of the ‘Erasmus placements’ that give students the opportunity to gain work experience abroad, and insists that this action be continued and reinforced by suitable funding also under the new programme;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Emphasises that the importance of placements as a means of gaining practical and vocational experience must not underestimate the fact that students’ skills also include elements of knowledge and general culture that are not immediately applicable and transferable to the professional needs of the labour market;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Highlights the need to track graduates’ employment outcomes to measure how well higher education reforms have actually respond
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Highlights the
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.Highlights the need to track graduates’ employment outcomes to measure how well higher education responds to labour market demands; welcomes therefore the Commission’s commitment to improving the availability of such data, with the principal aim of offering students information that is necessary and useful so they can orientate their study choices, and at the same time, giving higher education and research institutions the information to identify and subsequently develop programmes of study in terms of general knowledge as well as specific professional skills through lifelong learning, in a permanent dialogue with actors involved in the production of knowledge but also with society and the country;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Highlights the need to track graduates' employment outcomes to measure how well higher education responds to labour market demands; welcomes therefore the Commission's commitment to improving the availability of such data; and urges Member States to collect and publish statistical data regarding the correlation between different higher education degrees and employment opportunities;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.Calls for the development of an international databa
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls for the development of an international database, similar to AlmaLaurea, which helps graduates to identify suitable job opportunities, thereby encouraging mobility and the matching of skills and jobs;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas individuals must be supported in re-thinking of their careers and widen as well as update their skills and knowledge at an ever faster rate in order to meet the challenges of the labour market;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Urges all EU countries to implement the national qualification frameworks linked to the Qualifications Framework of the EHEA and to develop and financially support mutual recognition;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses that greater coordination among Member States in the field of higher education - also through a strong financial and political support for agreements on common core curricula and well defined learning outcomes - is a precondition for the achievement of the goals of employability and growth in Europe;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers the Youth Guarantees Schemes a valuable tool facilitating the transition from higher education to jobs and calls on Member States to introduce them in their national transition strategies;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Recalls the important role that structural funds can play in this regard; welcomes the commitment within the Youth Opportunities communication towards the full deployment of resources available and calls on the higher education institutions and local authorities to use this opportunity in order to increase the support and guidance for students entering the labour market;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages higher education institutions to engage with their regions and establish collaborative actions with local councils
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages higher education institutions to engage more intensively with their regions and establish collaborative actions with
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages higher education institutions to engage with their regions and establish collaborative actions with local councils, non-governmental organisations and small and medium-sized enterprises to enhance regional development; this should also strengthen interaction between higher education institutions and employers;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages higher education institutions to engage with their regions and establish dynamic collaborative actions with local councils, non- governmental organisations and small and medium-sized enterprises to enhance regional development;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Member States, their central and regional authorities, to include and to support in cross-border cooperation higher education institutions;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Welcomes the Commission's support
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas individuals
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Welcomes the Commission's support for
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Welcomes the Commission’s support for ‘Knowledge Alliances’ and ‘Sector
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Welcomes the Commission's support for ‘Knowledge Alliances’ and ‘Sector Skills Alliances’ in which higher education institutions and businesses jointly develop curricula to address skills shortages; calls upon businesses and entrepreneurs, including small and medium-sized enterprises, actively to develop partnerships with higher education institutions, by providing high-quality internships for students and lecturers, by capitalising on the general transferable skills of lecturers;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.Welcomes the Commission’s support for ‘Knowledge Alliances’ and ‘Sector Skills Alliances’ in which higher education institutions and businesses jointly develop curricula to address skills shortages; calls upon businesses and entrepreneurs, including small and medium-sized enterprises, actively to develop partnerships with higher education institutions; reiterates however that higher education institutions produce cultural content that not only translates into vocational skills but also general knowledge, in terms of intellectual experience of reality and common values by which citizens live;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.Emphasises the
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the need to develop mechanisms and management strategies that facilitate the transfer of innovative ideas and research results into society and business and allow society and businesses to provide input to higher education regarding needs for skills and innovations, taking into account best practices from all over the world;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the need to develop mechanisms and management strategies that facilitate the transfer of innovative ideas and research results into business and allow business to provide input to higher education regarding current and expected needs for skills and innovations, taking into account best practices from all over the world;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Encourages the Member States to intensify the interaction between the sides of the knowledge triangle (education, research, innovation) as a key element for growth and job creation;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Reaffirms the value of democratic governance as a fundamental way to ensure academic freedom and promote active participation of all actors in the life of a higher education institution;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Emphasises that transparency, equal distribution of rights and obligations between the relevant cooperation partners and the higher education institutions, and a balanced principle of representation are to be observed during cooperation, so as to ensure that higher education institutions are enabled to organise and develop themselves independently according to academic principles as public amenities;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas individuals must re-think their careers and widen as well as update their skills and knowledge at an ever faster rate, taking into account that there is a difference between vocational study programmes, where European harmonisation is feasible and desirable, and humanities courses, where there should continue to be substantial freedom and autonomy in study and research programmes with regard to the historical and cultural differences of European Union Member States and diversity of teaching in higher education institutions and their specific mission;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Highlights the commitment towards more flexible and innovative learning approaches and delivery methods always centred at students' needs;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Points out that the formulation of higher education curricula and research programmes should remain a task of the universities, taking into account the necessities of the labour market, in as far as employability is concerned;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Also emphasises that the principle of democracy and self-governance among higher education institutions and their staff and students should be respected and maintained in all collaborative projects;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17 b. Therefore demands that higher education institutions and their various bodies should be required to disclose cooperative agreements with third parties;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that continuous investment in and strengthening of the link between education, research and innovation is necessary to make the knowledge triangle work more efficiently and to enable higher education to contribute to jobs and growth, to reform governance and financing structures, and enhance the international attractiveness of higher education; stresses the importance of further supporting and developing the European Institute for Innovation and Technology with its knowledge and innovation communities;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.Stresses that continuous public investment in the link between education, research and innovation is necessary; stresses the importance of further supporting and developing the European Institute for Innovation and Technology with its knowledge and innovation communities;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that continuous investment in the link between education, culture, research and innovation is necessary; stresses the importance of further supporting and developing the European Institute for Innovation and Technology with its knowledge and innovation communities;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on Member States to strengthen their cooperation between their relevant ministries in order to update the existing curricula to meet the needs of the labour market;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Emphasizes the importance of culture in higher education and calls for the inclusion of special criteria for the humanities in both innovation and research;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underlines the importance of sport in the education process; calls on Member States to support and encourage sport activity among students and to increase support for grass-root sport programmes;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Emphasises the need to engage higher education institutions and provide support for student initiatives as well as assisting in the correlation of such activities among other higher education institutions, enterprises and local authorities from various Member States;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18 b. Notes the need for cooperation, both from cross-border higher education institutions and enterprises in practical programmes and in shaping the future career of students by identifying the concrete courses of development, expectations and challenges that will be placed before them in the labour market;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.Emphasises the importance of language skills as a prerequisite for increased mobility within the EHEA and employability; supports the
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Emphasises the importance of language skills as a prerequisite for increased mobility within the EHEA and employability; supports the development of language and sign language teaching;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Emphasises the importance of language skills as a prerequisite for increased mobility within the EHEA and employability; supports the development of language teaching, and the teaching and development of local and regional languages;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Emphasises the importance of cooperation between higher education institutions and NGOs and the European voluntary sector, in order to promote active citizenship and the involvement of students in active participation through working for the NGO sector;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Calls on Member States, the EU and European higher education systems, to evaluate the possibility of promoting within the study cycle, a compulsory training period at a university in a Member State other than the one to which the student is affiliated;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19 b. Asks the Commission to propose the creation of Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus and Leonardi da Vinci programmes, aimed at promoting transnational mobility of students from both sides of the Mediterranean;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 c (new) 19 c. Supports the proposal of the Commission to improve recognition of studies carried out abroad, reinforcing the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS); calls for an additional effort on the part of the EU and Member States towards more effective recognition and improved harmonisation also as regards academic qualifications;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Europa 2020 Strategy assumes that by 2020, 40 % of 30-34 year- olds in Europe should complete higher education or equivalent studies, given the estimate that 35 % of all jobs in the EU will require such qualifications; however, in 2010 only 26 % of the workforce in the EU had attained this qualification level;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Points out that
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses the need to preserve the diversity of educational pathways, teaching, teaching methods and university systems within the European Union; is of the view that a national qualifications framework is needed to that end while also promoting mutual recognition of degrees and qualifications in all the member countries;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Reiterates the principle that loan schemes cannot substitute the grant systems put in place to support access to education for all students regardless of their social background;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes the Commission's proposal to create a financial instrument to help students secure funding for a Masters degree outside their home Member State, regardless of their social background and financial possibilities; demands fair and transparent access to the scheme throughout the Member States;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the persistent disparities between western and central-eastern European higher education systems must be addressed through real integration measures, therefore calls on the Commission to develop a strategy for reducing these strong regional disparities;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas more than 21 % of young people in the EU are unemployed; whereas significant cutbacks to education budgets by several Member States, combined with a constant increase in education fees, have led to a massive increase in the number of students who are vulnerable, in debt, and have to resort to paid employment to fund their studies;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the persistent disparities between western and central-eastern European higher education systems must be addressed through real integration measures, in the interest of this encouraging and supporting cross-border collaboration between institutes of higher education;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Points out that the persistent disparities between western and central-eastern European higher education systems must be addressed through real integration measures, in particular through the development of scholarship programs for the most active and talented students and the development of exchange programs for students and researchers;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the Commission to elaborate a professional and financial action plan to diminish these disparities;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates that higher education is a common
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates that higher education is a common European public good and that Member States, regional governments and local authorities and the EU share a common responsibility in developing and strengthening the EHEA and the Bologna Process;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates that higher education is a common European public good and that Member States and the EU share a common responsibility in developing and strengthening the EHEA, the ERA and the Bologna Process;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Calls for the opening of mobility programs, exchanges, research and practice for students from countries affiliated to the Eastern Partnership;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Endorses the Commission's proposal to increase the EU budget available for
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Endorses the Commission's proposal to increase the EU budget available for education, training and research in the next multiannual financial framework, given the fact that investment in education, training and research is key to reaching the EU 2020 targets and achieving smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Endorses the Commission's proposal to increase the EU budget available for education, training
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas more than 21 % of young people in the EU are unemployed, while the increasing number of young people with disabilities is significantly underrepresented in higher education;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Points out that universities exist in an extremely competitive environment and need to be able to respond to the needs of labour markets and to attract the highest quality lecturers, researchers and students; notes that, whilst every citizen should have the opportunity to study at university, the vast majority of the world's top higher education institutions are to be found in the United States, where public funding is low and school fees are extremely high, enabling those universities and colleges to provide their students with the best in teaching and research;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) D a. whereas in the EU in 2010, 16.5 % of young people were not in education or the labour market;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2011 on the EU strategy on Roma inclusion1,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas in the EU in 2010, unemployment of tertiary education graduates stood at 5.4 % compared to more than 15 % among those with only lower secondary education; whereas, on the other hand, it is taking longer and longer for the majority of those graduates to find secure employment, and more often than not, they first have to complete several internships and accept temporary employment contracts or work for which they are overqualified;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas only 200 of Europe’s 4 000 higher education institutions rank among the top 500 in the world; whereas, however, rankings are often unreliable, and fail to reflect the diversity of pathways and programmes across the various countries and often only take English language publications into consideration in their ranking criteria;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas 75 of the top 200 Universities world-wide are to be found in the EU Member States, 29 of which are from the United Kingdom, 14 from Germany and 10 from the Netherlands;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas, in a knowledge-based society, the future of the citizens of Member States hinges on education, research and innovation;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas Article 165 of the TFEU clearly states that it is the sole responsibility of Member States to organise their education systems and the content of teaching;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. whereas equal access for all young people to higher education and training should be encouraged
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas legislations of Member States of the European Union consider higher education as a fundamental infrastructure for setting the future of European citizens;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. whereas the fact that education, especially higher education and tertiary education is responsible for shaping the attitudes and values that underlie civil society,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on higher education institutions to integrate lifelong learning into their curricula and adapt to a student base that includes adults, non-traditional learners and full-time students who have to work while studying, as well as people with disabilities, and therefore calls on the institutions of higher education to implement programs aimed at removing existing obstacles and barriers;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on higher education institutions to integrate with the aid of economic assistance and different study programmes, lifelong learning into their curricula and adapt to a student base that includes adults, non-traditional learners
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 a (new) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on higher education institutions to integrate lifelong learning into their curricula and adapt to a student base that includes adults, non-traditional learners (including young people with disabilities) and full-time students who have to work while studying;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on higher education institutions to integrate lifelong learning into their curricula and adapt to a student base that includes adults and elderly people, non- traditional learners and full-time students who have to work while studying;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.Calls on higher education institutions to integrate lifelong learning into their curricula and adapt to a student base that includes adults, non-traditional learners and full-time students who have to work while studying; calls, therefore, on Member States to consider freezing registration fees since, during this period of economic and social crisis, such fees constitute a barrier to access to higher education and equal career opportunities for the majority of people;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Whereas the challenge of improving the quality of education is a more important goal than a quantitative target in the planned process of modernisation of the European higher education systems;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on Member States to follow the good example of the so-called third-age or third-generation universities;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Whereas that in the current system of higher education there are vocational higher education institutions whose purpose is primarily to prepare students for entry into the labour market and universities, where education and scientific activities are values in themselves;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Whereas, in accordance with article 165 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the EU fully respects Member States' responsibility for the content of teaching and organisation of education systems, as well as their cultural and linguistic diversity;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Invites higher education institutions to take into account the needs of professionals who need to update their skills
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Invites higher education institutions to take into account the needs of professionals who need to update and broaden their skills
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.Invites higher education institutions to take into account the needs of professionals who need to update their skills in a short space of time, also through the organisation and fine-tuning of update courses that are accessible to all social groups;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 20 a (new) - having regard to the report by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A7-0263/2011) 1, 1 P7_TA-PROV(2011)0453, 25.10.2011
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Invites higher education institutions to take into account the needs of professionals who need to update their skills in a short space of time, and to develop strategies for their integration as life-long learners;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.Invites higher education institutions to take into account the needs of professionals who need to update their skills in a short space of time; insists that higher education institutions can play a key role in responding to the need to secure careers through the development of courses that meet the needs of workers, thereby facilitating a return to education for workers faced with job losses or the end of an employment contract, as well as voluntary mobility for other workers and promotion on the condition that the programmes lead to secure and well-paid employment;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on higher education institutions to uphold the spirit of autonomy in teaching and research while providing specific study programmes with the aim of meeting the needs of professionals who are requesting to update their skills;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Invites higher education institutions to encourage students' participation in sports;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on higher education institutions to adapt to new challenges by creating new fields of study that reflect the needs of the labour market, taking into account the development of science and technology by maintaining an appropriate balance between theoretical knowledge and practical skills;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the wide variety of higher education institutions in Europe;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.Acknowledges the richness inherent in the wide variety of higher education institutions in Europe; calls on the Member States and these institutions to develop clear, integrated, pathways that allow learners to progress from other types of education into higher education and to change between different tracks and types of institutions;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.Acknowledges the wide variety of higher education institutions in Europe; calls on the Member States and these institutions to develop clear, integrated, pathways that allow learners to progress from other types of education into higher education and to change between different tracks and types of institutions; emphasises, however, the need to maintain the diversity of educational pathways and programmes, teaching methods and university systems within the European Union; considers that a national framework of qualification is necessary to that end, while at the same time promoting the mutual recognition of degrees and qualifications across all Member States;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the complementary role of state, private and religious forms of higher education across Europe;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that academic staff and students, as well as their organisations, need to be involved in the modernisation of higher education institutions;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 20 a (new) – having regard to the report of the Culture and Education Committee ‘An EU Strategy for Youth – Investing and Empowering’ (Α7-0113/2010) 1, 1 P7_TA(2010)0166, 18.05.2010
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.Emphasises that academic staff and students, as well as their organisations and associations, need to be involved in the modernisation of higher education institutions; stresses that excellence in both research and teaching needs to be rewarded, without thereby penalising those higher education institutions – for example humanities faculties – that do not fall within the evaluation and performance criteria linked solely to the skills demanded by the market economy;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.Emphasises that academic staff and students should meet high moral standards, as well as their organisations, needing to be involved in the modernisation of higher education institutions; stresses that excellence in both research and teaching needs to be rewarded;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that academic staff and students, as well as their organisations, need to be involved in the modernisation of higher education institutions; stresses that excellence in both research
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. En
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Endorses the Commission’s initiative to launch a multi-dimensional tool for the differentiated ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as the quality of teaching, regional engagement and
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Endorses the Commission's initiative to launch a multi-dimensional tool for ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as the quality of teaching, student support (scholarships, counselling, housing, etc.), regional engagement and knowledge transfer;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Endorses the Commission’s initiative to launch a multi-dimensional tool for ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as the quality of teaching, physical and info- communication accessibility, regional engagement and knowledge transfer;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Endorses the Commission's initiative to launch a multi-dimensional tool for ranking of higher education institutions based
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic crisis, and its consequences in terms of the imposition of austerity measures and budget cutbacks, demographic developments, rapid technological change and the resulting demand for new skills pose serious challenges to, and call for far- reaching reforms in Europe’s higher education systems which should not have a detrimental effect on the quality of education;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Endorses the Commission's initiative to launch a multi-dimensional tool for the classification and ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as the quality of teaching, regional engagement and knowledge transfer;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Endorses the Commission’s initiative to launch a multi-dimensional tool for ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as the quality of teaching, regional engagement and knowledge transfer, without thereby establishing a classification of higher education institutions on the basis of non- homogeneous performance indicators between the various and specific training courses, in order to prevent public policy in the field of education favouring certain higher education institutions and to redistribute investment in a more equitable manner between all types of higher education teaching;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Endorses the Commission’s initiative to launch a multi-dimensional tool for ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as the quality of teaching, regional engagement and knowledge transfer, cooperation with institutions that are also involved in developing and implementing a system of higher education;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Endorses the Commission’s initiative to launch a multi-dimensional tool for ranking of higher education institutions based on characteristics such as the quality of teaching, regional engagement and knowledge transfer; stresses that the quality and relevance of higher education are a core condition for taking full advantage of Europe’s intellectual capital;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5.a. Proposes the introduction of clear and uniform criteria for the creation of pan-European rankings of higher education institutions, allowing prospective students to make an informed choice of university and providing comprehensive information about the university;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Also emphasises that this tool should not solely involve compiling conventional ranking tables and that specific characteristics of the relevant institutions should be afforded due attention in the results;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Suggests taking into account the institution of a unified mechanism for the monitoring and evaluation of compliance to academic standards in higher education institutions, both public and private;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Demands that the attractiveness of
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Demands that the attractiveness of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) for students and researchers from all over the world be promoted and that collaboration with non-EU countries in educational matters be strengthened; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen current programmes and create new programmes for cooperation and research, based on mutual interest, with universities in countries outside the EU, with particular attention to those located in conflict zones, in order to facilitate access to higher education and to train students and researchers, without discriminating on economic, social, racial or political grounds; calls in particular for the establishment of partnerships between universities in the EU and universities in the Maghreb countries and Palestinian territories;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Demands that the attractiveness of the
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the economic crisis, demographic
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Demands that the attractiveness of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and the European Research Area (ERA) for students and researchers from all over the world be promoted and that collaboration with non-EU countries in educational matters be strengthened;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.Demands that the attractiveness of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) for students and researchers from all over the world be promoted and that collaboration with non-EU countries in educational matters be strengthened, in particular with the countries that make up the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) or that directly border the EU, in order to turn the EHEA into a magnet for training and knowledge that is both macroregional and global;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Demands that the attractiveness of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) for students and researchers from all over the world be promoted and that collaboration with non-EU countries in educational matters be strengthened, especially countries associated with the European Neighbourhood Policy programme;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.Demands that the attractiveness of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) for students and researchers from all over the world be promoted and that collaboration with non-EU countries in educational matters be strengthened, particularly in matters of exchange and professional training programmes;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls the importance of mobility of both students and teachers and, in this sense, invites the Commission to make progress on the EU Visa Code;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out the need for collaboration between the EHEA and the ERA, as a means to support university research programmes both in science and the humanities;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that higher education is a public
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that higher education is a public good that fosters culture, diversity and democratic values
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that higher education is a public good that fosters culture, diversity and democratic values and prepares students to become active citizens and which supports native language education of native ethnic and language communities living in the Member States;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Repeatedly insists on Member States' reaching the target of 2% of GDP invested in education;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) A a. whereas universities have been an important resource in Europe for almost a millennium, and the importance of their role in the progress of society should not be reduced to their contribution to the economy and their development should not solely depend on their ability to adapt to the economic needs of the current economic model;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Emphasises the role of promoting democratic values, stressing the importance of acquiring a solid knowledge of European integration, and understanding former totalitarian regimes of Europe as common history;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that private and public funding is of primary importance for higher education; emphasises that
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that public funding is of primary importance for higher education; emphasises that investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis; calls on the Member States and higher education institutions to develop innovative funding mechanisms; opposes, therefore, significant cutbacks to education budgets in several Member States, as well as the constant increase in education fees, which is leading to a significant increase in the number of vulnerable students, who are more and more often in debt, and have had to resort to paid employment to fund their studies; takes the view that this situation impedes the objective of increasing the number of students and young graduates, as well strengthening social aspect of education as a public service;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that public funding is of primary importance for higher education; emphasises that increased investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis and fostering smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; calls on the Member States and higher education institutions to develop innovative funding mechanisms to complement public funding without increasing the pressure on households, as the latter could lead for example to lower participation, to undesirable shifts in the social make-up of the student population and to the creation or exacerbation of imbalances in mobility flows between Member States or regions;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that public funding is of primary importance for higher education; emphasises that investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.Points out that public funding is of primary importance for the modernisation of the system of public higher education; emphasises that investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis; calls on the Member States and higher education institutions to develop innovative funding mechanisms, with the aim of achieving a substantial increase in public investment, without which the quality of public higher education would be at risk;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that public funding is of primary importance for higher education; emphasises that investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis; calls on the Member States and higher education institutions to develop innovative funding mechanisms and to expand scholarship and funding programmes for higher education institutions;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that public funding is of primary importance for higher education; emphasises that investment in higher education in Europe is crucial to overcoming the current economic crisis; calls on the Member States and higher education institutions to develop innovative funding mechanisms that also ensure native ethnic and language communities and persons belonging to minorities living in the Member States have access to education in their native language;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls for inclusion in the EU budget for the years 2014-2020 under the European Regional Development Fund and European Social Fund of spending on higher education related to investments in universities infrastructure, and in academic staff;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) A b. whereas universities encourage individual autonomy and creativity and have a very important role in the promotion of knowledge, Member States should therefore make every effort to ensure that higher education is widely accessible without discrimination particularly on social, economic, cultural, racial or political grounds;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility but only if inequalities and exclusion are tackled as early as possible and if access to quality early childhood education and an inclusive and supportive school climate are guaranteed for all children; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access for students from all social backgrounds and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets the fact that many higher education institutions are underfunded and the significant reduction in public funds for these institutions in some Member States; reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access for students from all social backgrounds and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access for students from all social backgrounds, including access for native ethnic and language communities living in the Member States to higher education in their native language, and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access for students from all social backgrounds, to ensure equal access to the built environment and to the services provided, and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism, including sign languages, as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility, benefiting disadvantaged communities in a complex way, with its positive socio-economic impacts reaching far beyond the individual concerned; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access for students from all social backgrounds and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access and foster study success for students from all social backgrounds, persons living with disabilities, students belonging to national, ethnic or linguistic minorities and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access for students from all social backgrounds, develop adequate financial support schemes and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates that higher education has the potential to promote social inclusion and upward social mobility; calls on Member States and higher education institutions to widen access for students from all social backgrounds and to recognise multiculturalism and multilingualism as a fundamental value of the EU that needs to be fostered; recalls that in order to achieve this objective, the principle of subsidiarity should prevail, respecting the competences from regional and local authorities on linguistic matters;
source: PE-480.629
2012/02/08
FEMM
49 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A A. whereas over 60 % of university graduates are women, but the majority of senior positions in universities (e.g. postdoctoral positions and professorships) are still held by men; whereas only 13 % of institutions in the higher education sector were headed by women and only 9 % of universities had a female head of staff and therefore considerably less influence with regard to research decision-making,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on universities, the EU institutions and the Member States to encourage young women to study subjects in which women are still underrepresented, especially science, technology, engineering and mathematics,
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on universities, the EU institutions and the Member States to encourage young women to study subjects in which women are still underrepresented, especially science, technology, IT, engineering and mathematics, and to inform them about their possibilities of becoming researchers and the opportunities available in the research field, including applied research, as that should liberate untapped talent;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point 1 (new) (1) Calls on secondary schools and on universities to offer specific orientation courses in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, in order to inform and encourage women to study and embark on careers in fields in which men are overrepresented;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that gender disparity continues to exist in European education systems today despite the policies that have now been implemented by almost all countries to combat it, and that such situations determine both performance at school as well as choices regarding study courses and professions, and have a negative effect on economic growth and on the welfare state;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Calls on universities and higher education colleges to support and encourage gender studies in both undergraduate and postgraduate level;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Calls on Member States and higher education institutions to introduce special programmes and funds, mentoring schemes and community projects to increase young women's training and participation in Research and Development as well as in the IT sector and green economy, and should make optimal use of role models and pathfinders as a means to inform and advise women students concerning their career choices;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on universities and higher education colleges to recognise that women learners may have specific responsibilities
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on universities and higher education colleges to recognise that women learners may have specific responsibilities outside of learning, for example, caring for young children or elderly relatives; providing a sufficient number of high- quality affordable and accessible childcare is a vital step in offering parents and especially women, a genuine choice to study. Other Reforms could be improved community centres;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on universities and higher education colleges to recognise that women learners may have specific additional responsibilities outside of learning, for example, caring for young children or elderly relatives; encourages therefore to introduce a greater variety of study modes, e.g. part-time and distance learning;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A a (new) A a. whereas 35% of all jobs in the EU will require high-level qualifications by 2020, whereas only 26% of the workforce currently has a higher education qualification,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on universities and higher education colleges to recognise that women learners may have specific responsibilities outside of learning, for example, caring for young children or elderly relatives
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that in order to achieve effective gender equality in education it is essential to eliminate the remaining stereotypes by promoting assertive policies promoting equality between men and women;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on Member States to follow the good example of the so-called third-age or third-generation universities and encourage women to enrol;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it necessary to review the criteria for promotion to senior research- oriented positions (e.g. professorships) in order to include a strong gender perspective and address the
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it necessary to
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it necessary to review the criteria for promotion to senior research- oriented positions (e.g. professorships) in order to include a strong gender perspective and address the lack of women in these posts
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it necessary to
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it necessary to review the criteria for promotion to senior research- oriented positions (e.g. professorships)
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it necessary to review the criteria for promotion to senior research- oriented positions (e.g. professorships) in order to include a strong gender perspective and address the lack of women in these posts
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that, in all Member States, there are still very few initiatives in place aimed at providing information about gender equality and at promoting gender equality in education; suggests that it is appropriate for teachers to receive specific training regarding equality between men and women;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A a (new) A a. whereas the share of female students of a total number of students in Mathematics, Science and Technology subjects (MST) reaches only 30.15 % and the largely female-dominated fields are education and training, health and welfare and humanities and arts,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Considers it necessary that higher and further education institutions review their internal instruments as so that they can recruit and promote the best people, including a significant number of women;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Encourages Member States and higher education institutions to increase the number of female professors and researchers in science, and to initiate mass media information campaigns to address the issue of under-representation of women in MST subjects;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Highlights the fact that many female students attending vocational and secondary schools still choose careers which reflect traditional gender roles; notes, therefore, that better vocational guidance is needed in order to combat persisting stereotypes;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Calls on higher education institutions to set a benchmark of at least 40 % for all female teaching positions, and 50% for all doctors and professors especially when there is a single post or an odd number of posts to create an extra post to reach the absolute gender balance;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that higher education should give tools to women to enable them to achieve better positions in the private sector and develop their entrepreneurial skills, thus promoting growth and jobs in the EU; insists, therefore, that women should be encouraged to participate actively in university/private sector partnerships and co-operations, e.g. through start-ups or spin-
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises that in order to effectively fight gender inequality, which still exists in the education sector, it is essential to encourage political cooperation between Member States by promoting the exchange of good practices and by guaranteeing specific funding programmes;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on universities and higher education
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Urges all the Bologna Process countries to implement national qualification frameworks and to develop and financially support mutual recognition;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Reiterates the Commission's announcement from 1 March 2011 to propose European legislation in 2012 including binding targets for increasing representation of each sex to a minimum of 40%, if companies do not increase the proportions of women on their decision- making bodies voluntarily by 5 % a year reaching, reaching 30% female representation by 2015 and 40% female representation by 2020;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A b (new) A b. whereas the presence of a critical mass of women in the decision-making process remains vastly inadequate,
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Recognises that women still face barriers on reaching the highest-level in post-graduate education and research; calls therefore on Member States and universities to design and implement national strategies to ensure women´s participation therein;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on further government support to put in place measures to widen access to students from underrepresented groups and lower socio-economic backgrounds, as well as to immigrants and minorities;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to set up programmes of coaching and supporting young women scientists in participating in research programmes and grant applications in order to help them to stay in academia and research;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates that the gender pay gap is still a huge concern
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates that the gender pay gap is still a huge concern and that in the field of higher education women researchers and professors are paid less than their male counterparts at the same level; calls for an equal remuneration system for the same research positions;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Criticises that the Commission's agenda for the modernisation of Europe's higher education systems is gender blind and gender mainstreaming basically non existent;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls on Member States to introduce as a criteria for eligibility for state funded research projects the condition of a gender balanced research team;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Reminds that as a consequence of their higher education qualification being not marketable enough, women are more often overqualified and underpaid for their jobs and often end up in precarious jobs or unemployed, which at the start of the career further disadvantages them in the labour markets, feeding the cycle of pay inequality;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Stresses that improving the participation of young women on the labour market has particularly positive effects on competitiveness and growth as well as on ensuring the economic independence of women at early and late stages of their life;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Encourages higher education institutions to include a gender dimension in the higher education curricula as it still remains largely absent;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B B. whereas there is a
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B B. whereas there is a disturbingly low proportion of women on decision-making boards relating to research, w
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B B. whereas there is a disturbingly low proportion of women on decision-making boards relating to research,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B a (new) B a. whereas EU 2020 outlines the need for smart growth in the EU and highlights the importance of R&D and innovation policy, yet numbers of females graduating from STEM subjects remain low, with only 20% of engineering graduates being women,
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on universities, the EU institutions and the Member States to encourage young women to study subjects in which women are still underrepresented, especially science, technology, engineering and mathematics, and to inform them about their possibilities of becoming researchers and the opportunities available in the research field, including applied research, as that should liberate any untapped talent; reasonable gender balance should be mandatory in study and any imbalance must be justified;
source: PE-480.849
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/0/name |
Old
NEVEĎALOVÁ KatarínaNew
ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ Katarína |
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE476.092New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-476092_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.629New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-480629_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.580&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-480580_EN.html |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-57&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0057_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-139New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0139_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CULT/7/07729New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/selected_topics |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0567:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0567:EN
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|