Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | DEL CASTILLO VERA Pilar ( PPE) | TRAUTMANN Catherine ( S&D), ROHDE Jens ( ALDE), ANDERSDOTTER Amelia ( Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | VERHEYEN Sabine ( PPE) | Josef WEIDENHOLZER ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | SARGENTINI Judith ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
- 1.20.09 Protection of privacy and data protection
- 2.10.03 Standardisation, EC/EU standards and trade mark, certification, compliance
- 2.40 Free movement of services, freedom to provide
- 2.40.02 Public services, of general interest, universal service
- 2.80 Cooperation between administrations
- 3.30.06 Information and communication technologies, digital technologies
- 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet
- 3.45.08 Business environment, reduction of the administrative burdens
- 3.50.15 Intellectual property, copyright
- 4.60.06 Consumers' economic and legal interests
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe in response to the commission communication on the subject.
Parliament welcomed the Commission’s ambition to develop a coherent approach to cloud services, which constituted a significant advancement in information and communication technologies (ICT). It considered, however, that in order to achieve the ambitious goals set out by the strategy, a legislative instrument would have been more adequate for some aspects.
Parliament stressed the following points:
· cloud services must offer security and reliability . The safe use of internet services, including cloud computing should be encouraged;
· Union law should be neutral and not be adapted to either facilitate or hinder any legal business model or service;
· a strategy on cloud computing should encompass collateral aspects such as the energy consumption of data centres and related environmental issues;
· owing to the limited budget of the Connecting Europe Facility , support for broadband deployment needed to be supplemented with assistance provided under other Union programmes and initiatives, including the European Structural and Investment Funds;
the EU had an obvious interest in having more server farms on its soil since it would foster trust by ensuring EU sovereignty over the servers.
The cloud as an instrument for growth and employment : cloud computing could become a transformative development in all sectors of the economy, with special relevance in areas such as health care, energy, public services and education. Parliament stressed, however, that the development of cloud services, in the absence or insufficient availability of broadband infrastructure, risks widening the digital divide between urban and rural areas. In this context, Members underlined:
· the importance of e-skills and digital education actions in cloud computing development in order to tackle the rising unemployment, especially among young people;
· the need to create more qualification schemes for specialists managing cloud computing services;
· the positive impact of cloud computing services on SMEs , in particular those established in areas facing economic difficulties.
The EU market and the cloud: Parliament stressed that the internal market should remain open to all providers complying with Union law . It insisted that the Commission:
· take measures to counter the risk that information was accessed directly or indirectly by foreign governments, where such access was not allowed under Union law;
· ensure a competitive and transparent Union market in order to provide all Union users with secure, sustainable, affordable and reliable services.
Members welcomed the Commission’s intention to establish an EU-wide certification system that would provide an incentive for developers and providers of cloud computing services to invest in better privacy protection.
Public procurement : Parliament invited the Commission and the Member States to speed up the work of the European Cloud Partnership. It encouraged public administrations to consider safe, reliable and secure cloud services in IT procurement, while underlining their particular responsibilities with respect to protection of information relating to citizens, accessibility and continuity of service. It recalled that data integrity and security must be guaranteed and unauthorised access prevented.
The Commission was asked to take the lead in promoting standards and specifications supporting privacy-friendly, reliable, highly interoperable, secure and energy-efficient cloud services.
Consumers: Members asked the Commission to:
· raise consumer awareness of all risks related to the use of cloud services;
· ensure that any commercial agreements between telecommunications operators and cloud providers are fully compliant with EU competition law and that they allow consumers full access to any cloud service, using an internet connection offered by any telecommunications operator;
explore appropriate measures to develop a minimum acceptable level of consumer rights in relation to cloud services, covering issues such as privacy, data storage in third countries, and liability for data losses.
Intellectual property : Parliament report urges the Commission to take action to further harmonise laws across the Member States. It called, in particular, for clarification of the intellectual property rights regime and for a review of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, the Unfair Contract Terms Directive and the E-Commerce Directive, which are the most relevant pieces of EU legislation that apply to cloud computing.
The Commission should also:
· establish a clear legal framework in the field of copyright content in the cloud, especially with regard to licensing regulations;
· investigate how the cloud storage of copyrighted works affects the royalties systems and, more specifically, the ways in which private copying levies that are relevant for certain types of cloud computing services are imposed;
promote the development of decentralised services based on free and open-source software that would enable EU citizens to regain control over their personal data and communication.
Data protection : Parliament called on the Commission and the Council unequivocally to recognise digital freedoms as fundamental rights and as indispensable prerequisites for enjoying universal human rights.
Members urged the Commission to develop a more holistic communication on cloud computing that takes into account, alongside a reference to fundamental rights, at least the following:
· guidelines to ensure full compliance with the EU’s fundamental rights and data protection obligations;
· limitative conditions under which cloud data may or may not be accessed for law enforcement purposes,
· safeguards against illegal access by foreign and domestic entities,
· proposals on how to define the ‘transfer’ of personal data and on how to update standard contractual clauses that are tailored to the cloud environment.
The Commission was urged, when negotiating international agreements that involve the processing of personal data, to take particular note of the risks and challenges that cloud computing poses to fundamental rights.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Pilar del CASTILLO VERA (EPP, ES) on unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe.
The Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, exercising their prerogatives as associated committees under Rule 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, were also consulted and gave an opinion on the report.
Members welcomed the Commission’s ambition to develop a coherent approach to cloud services, but considered that, in order to achieve the ambitious goals set out by the strategy, a legislative instrument would have been more adequate for some aspects . Owing to the limited budget of the Connecting Europe Facility, Members felt that support for broadband deployment needed to be supplemented with assistance provided under other Union programmes and initiatives, including the European Structural and Investment Funds.
The report also stressed the obvious interest for the EU in having more server farms on its soil since it would foster trust by ensuring EU sovereignty over the servers.
The cloud as an instrument for growth and employment : cloud computing could become a transformative development in all sectors of the economy, with special relevance in areas such as health care, energy, public services and education. Members noted that e-skills and digital education actions in cloud computing development could, consequently, be of extraordinary importance in order to tackle the rising unemployment, especially among young people. They recalled the need to create more qualification schemes for specialists managing cloud computing services. They also highlighted the positive impact of cloud computing services on SMEs, in particular those established in areas facing economic difficulties.
The EU market and the cloud : the report stressed that the internal market should remain open to all providers complying with Union law . They insisted that the Commission take measures to counter the risk that information was accessed directly or indirectly by foreign governments, where such access was not allowed under Union law.
Members also emphasised the importance of ensuring a competitive and transparent Union market in order to provide all Union users with secure, sustainable, affordable and reliable services.
Public procurement : the report encouraged public administrations to consider safe, reliable and secure cloud services in IT procurement, while underlining their particular responsibilities with respect to protection of information relating to citizens, accessibility and continuity of service. It recalled that data integrity and security must be guaranteed and unauthorised access, including by foreign governments and their intelligence services without a legal basis under Union or Member State law, prevented.
The Commission was asked to take the lead in promoting standards and specifications supporting privacy-friendly, reliable, highly interoperable, secure and energy-efficient cloud services.
Consumers: Members asked the Commission to ensure that any commercial agreements between telecommunications operators and cloud providers are fully compliant with EU competition law and that they allow consumers full access to any cloud service , using an internet connection offered by any telecommunications operator.
The Commission was asked to explore appropriate measures to develop a minimum acceptable level of consumer rights in relation to cloud services, covering issues such as privacy, data storage in third countries, liability for data losses and other matters of significant interest to consumers.
Intellectual property : the report urges the Commission to take action to further harmonise laws across the Member States in order to avoid jurisdictional confusion and fragmentation and to ensure transparency in the digital single market. It called, in particular, for clarification of the intellectual property rights regime and for a review of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, the Unfair Contract Terms Directive and the E-Commerce Directive, which are the most relevant pieces of EU legislation that apply to cloud computing.
The Commission should also:
establish a clear legal framework in the field of copyright content in the cloud, especially with regard to licensing regulations; investigate how the cloud storage of copyrighted works affects the royalties systems and, more specifically, the ways in which private copying levies that are relevant for certain types of cloud computing services are imposed; promote the development of decentralised services based on free and open-source software that would enable EU citizens to regain control over their personal data and communication.
Data protection : the report called on the Commission and the Council unequivocally to recognise digital freedoms as fundamental rights and as indispensable prerequisites for enjoying universal human rights.
Members regretted the approach in the Commission’s communication whereby it failed to mention the risks and challenges attached to cloud computing, and urged the Commission to develop a more holistic communication on cloud computing that takes into account, alongside a reference to fundamental rights, at least the following:
· guidelines to ensure full compliance with the EU’s fundamental rights and data protection obligations;
· limitative conditions under which cloud data may or may not be accessed for law enforcement purposes,
· safeguards against illegal access by foreign and domestic entities,
· proposals on how to define the ‘transfer’ of personal data and on how to update standard contractual clauses that are tailored to the cloud environment.
The Commission was urged, when negotiating international agreements that involve the processing of personal data, to take particular note of the risks and challenges that cloud computing poses to fundamental rights.
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)
The EDPS welcomes the Communication presented by the Commission on 27 September 2012.
The opinion focuses especially on the challenges that cloud computing poses for data protection and how the proposed data protection regulation would tackle them.
This EDPS’ opinion has three goals:
1) Highlight the relevance of privacy and data protection in the current discussions on cloud computing: the opinion underlines that the level of data protection in a cloud computing environment must not be inferior to that required in any other data processing context.
2) Analyse the difficulty of establishing unambiguously the responsibilities of the different actors and the notions of controller and processor : in this respect, the proposal for a regulation on data protection should:
· expand the circumstances in which a cloud service provider may be qualified as the controller;
· increase the responsibility and accountability of data controllers and processors, by introducing specific obligations such as data protection by design and by default, data security breach notifications, and data protection impact assessments ;
· require controllers and processors to implement mechanisms to demonstrate the effectiveness of the data protection measures implemented ;
· help cloud clients and cloud service providers adduce appropriate data protection safeguards for the transfers of personal data to data centres or servers located in third countries ;
· clarify the obligations of controllers and processors regarding the security of processing and information requirements in case of data breaches ;
· reinforce cooperation of supervisory authorities and their coordinated supervision over cross-border processing operations, which is particularly crucial in an environment such as cloud computing.
3) Identify areas that require further action at EU level from a data protection and privacy perspective . They include, amongst others:
providing further guidance ; standardisation efforts ; carrying out further risks assessments for specific sectors (such as the public sector) ; developing standard contract terms and conditions; engaging in international dialogue on issues related to cloud computing and ensuring effective means of international cooperation.
PURPOSE : to unleash the Potential of Cloud Computing in Europe.
BACKGROUND : ‘Cloud computing’ can be understood as the storing, processing and use of data on remotely located computers accessed over the internet. This means that users can command almost unlimited computing power on demand, that they do not have to make major capital investments to fulfil their needs and that they can get to their data from anywhere with an internet connection. Cloud computing has the potential to slash users' IT expenditure and to enable many new services to be developed.
Like the web, cloud computing is a technological development that has been ongoing for some time and will continue to develop. Unlike the web, cloud computing is still at a comparatively early stage, giving Europe a chance to act to ensure being at the forefront of its further development and to benefit on both demand and supply side through wide-spread cloud use and cloud provision.
Fragmentation of the digital single market due to differing national legal frameworks and uncertainties over applicable law, digital content and data location ranked highest amongst the concerns of potential cloud computing adopters and providers.
The Commission therefore aims at enabling and facilitating faster adoption of cloud computing throughout all sectors of the economy which can cut ICT costs, and when combined with new digital business practices, can boost productivity, growth and jobs.
In a preparatory study undertaken for the Commission, it is estimated that the public cloud would generate €250 billion in GDP in 2020 with cloud-friendly policies in place against €88 billion in the "no intervention" scenario, leading to extra cumulative impacts from 2015 to 2020 of €600 billion. This translates into the creation of 2.5 million extra jobs .
CONTENT : on the basis of an analysis of the overall policy, regulatory and technology landscapes and a wide consultation of stakeholders, undertaken to identify what needs to be done to achieve that goal, this document sets out the most important and urgent additional actions . It delivers one of the main actions foreseen in the Communication on e-Commerce and online services .
This strategy does not foresee the building of a "European Super-Cloud". However, one of the aims is to have publicly available cloud offerings ("public cloud") that meet European standards not only in regulatory terms but in terms of being competitive, open and secure.
Completing the Digital Single Market by moving as rapidly as possible to adoption and implementation of the Digital Agenda proposals that are on the table is the essential first step
towards making Europe cloud-friendly. These actions concern : Digital Agenda Actions "opening-up access to content" ; Digital Agenda Actions to "Make Online and Cross-Border Transactions Straightforward ; Digital Agenda Actions on Building Digital Confidence. But to move up a notch to become cloud-active, a climate of certainty and trust must be further developed so as to stimulate the active adoption of cloud computing in Europe.
To deliver on these goals therefore the European Commission will launch three cloud-specific actions:
Key Action 1 – Cutting through the Jungle of Standards.
Currently, individual vendors have an incentive to fight for dominance by locking in their customers, inhibiting standardised, industry-wide approaches. Despite numerous standardisation efforts, mostly led by suppliers, clouds may develop in a way that lacks interoperability, data portability and reversibility, all crucial for the avoidance of lock-in.
The Commission will:
promote trusted and reliable cloud offerings by tasking ETSI to coordinate with stakeholders in a transparent and open way to identify by 2013 a detailed map of the necessary standards (inter alia for security, interoperability, data portability and reversibility); enhance trust in cloud computing services by recognising at EU-level technical specifications in the field of information and communication technologies for the protection of personal information in accordance with the new Regulation on European Standardisation ; work with the support of ENISA and other relevant bodies to assist the development of EU-wide voluntary certification schemes in the area of cloud computing (including as regards data protection) and establish a list of such schemes by 2014.
Key Action 2: Safe and Fair Contract Terms and Conditions.
Traditional IT outsourcing arrangements were typically negotiated and related to data storage, processing facilities and services defined and described in detail and up-front. Cloud computing contracts, on the other hand, essentially create a framework in which the user has access to infinitely scalable and flexible IT capabilities according to his needs. However, currently the greater flexibility of cloud computing as compared to traditional outsourcing is often counterbalanced by reduced certainty for the customer due to insufficiently specific and balanced contracts with cloud providers. The Commission will by end 2013:
develop with stakeholders model terms for cloud computing service level agreements for contracts between cloud providers and professional cloud users, taking into account the developing EU acquis in this field; propose to consumers and small firms European model contract terms and conditions for those issues that fall within the Common European Sales Law proposal. The aim is to standardise key contract terms and conditions, providing best practice contract terms for cloud services on aspects related with the supply of "digital content"; reviewing standard contractual clauses applicable to transfer of personal data to third countries and adapting them, as needed, to cloud services; work with industry to agree a code of conduct for cloud computing providers to support a uniform application of data protection rules.
Key Action 3 – Promoting Common Public Sector Leadership through a European Cloud Partnership.
The public sector has a strong role to play in shaping the cloud computing market. As the EU's largest buyer of IT services, it can set stringent requirements for features, performance, security, interoperability and data portability and compliance with technical requirements. Several Member States have started national initiatives such as Andromede in France, G-Cloud in the UK and Trusted Cloud in Germany. But with the public sector market fragmented, its requirements have little impact, services integration is low and citizens do not get the best value for money.
The Commission considers that pooling public requirements could bring higher efficiency and common sectoral requirements (e.g. eHealth, social care, assisted living, and eGovernment services such as open data) would reduce costs and enable interoperability. The private sector would also benefit from higher quality services.
This year, the Commission is therefore setting up a European Cloud Partnership (ECP) to provide an umbrella for comparable initiatives at Member State level. The ECP will bring together industry expertise and public sector users to work on common procurement requirements for cloud computing in an open and fully transparent way.
The Commission will also build on its on-going international dialogues with the USA, India, Japan and other countries, as regards, inter alia, key themes related to cloud services, such as data protection; coordination of data security at the global level; cybersecurity, liability of intermediary service providers; standards and interoperability requirements; application of the tax law to cloud services.
Follow-up : the Commission will by the end of 2013 report on the progress on the full set of actions in this Strategy and present further policy and legislative proposals initiatives as needed.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)260
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0535/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0353/2013
- Committee opinion: PE514.601
- Committee opinion: PE504.203
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.774
- Committee draft report: PE506.114
- Committee opinion: PE504.198
- Contribution: COM(2012)0529
- Contribution: COM(2012)0529
- Document attached to the procedure: N7-0090/2013
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 253 03.09.2013, p. 0003
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2012)0529
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: N7-0090/2013 OJ C 253 03.09.2013, p. 0003
- Committee opinion: PE504.198
- Committee draft report: PE506.114
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE516.774
- Committee opinion: PE504.203
- Committee opinion: PE514.601
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)260
- Contribution: COM(2012)0529
- Contribution: COM(2012)0529
Amendments | Dossier |
141 |
2013/2063(INI)
2013/06/11
LIBE
54 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that notwithstanding the potential and benefits of ‘cloud computing’ for businesses, citizens and the public sector, it entails significant risks and challenges, particularly for fundamental rights and by increasing impact in case of disruptions, whether they are caused by malfunction, malpractice, criminal action, or in case of hostile action by another country;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that EU data protection law already fully applies to cloud computing services operating in the EU and thus must be fully respected; explicitly welcomes the fact that in Article 3(2) of its proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) the Commission proposes that the territorial scope of EU data protection law should be extended to cover controllers not established in the Union where such controllers offer goods and services to data subjects in the Union; points out, however, that many cloud computing services established outside the EU are aimed specifically at legal persons, who would not be covered if this definition were to be interpreted restrictively;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that EU data protection law
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that EU data protection law fully applies to cloud computing services operating in the EU and thus must be fully respected; recommends the full harmonisation of data protection rules across the EU in the review of the Data Protection Directive by addressing gaps related to cloud computing in other EU legislation;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls that, where a cloud provider uses the data for a purpose other than the purpose agreed on the service agreement, or communicates them or uses them in a way contrary to the terms of the contract, he should be considered data controller and should be held liable for the infringements and breaches incurred;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that cloud services agreements must set out the duties and rights of the parties concerning data processing activities by cloud providers, on a basis of respect for EU data protection law;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that cloud services agreements must set out the duties and rights of the parties concerning data processing activities by cloud providers in a clear and transparent manner, on a basis of respect for EU data protection law;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that cloud services agreements must set out the duties and rights of the parties concerning data processing activities by cloud providers, on a basis of respect for EU data protection law; recommends that full account be taken of Article 29 of the Working Party Opinion on cloud computing1; __________________ 1 WP 196, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data- protection/article- 29/documentation/opinion- recommendation/files/2012/wp196_en.pdf
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights that the role of the cloud service provider under the current EU legislation needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis, as providers can be both data processors and data controllers; urges improvement of the terms and conditions for all users by developing international best practice models for contracts and by clarifying where the service provider stores data and under which area of law within the EU;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights that particular attention must be given to those situations where the imbalance in the contractual situation between the customer and the cloud provider leads the customer to enter into contractual arrangements imposing standard services and contract to be signed, in which the provider defines the purposes, conditions, means of the processing1; in such circumstances, the cloud provider shall be considered "data controller" and becomes jointly liable with the customer; __________________ 1 Particularly in the case of consumers and SMEs using cloud services.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the use of cloud services by public authorities requires special consideration;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the use of cloud services by public authorities requires special consideration; emphasises that data integrity and security must be guaranteed and unauthorised access, including by foreign governments, prevented; stresses that this also applies to specific processing activities by certain non-governmental services which have access to personal data, such as banks, insurance companies, schools and hospitals;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the use of cloud services by public authorities requires special consideration
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the use of cloud services by public authorities, including EU institutions, requires special consideration, especially yet not exclusively when sensitive data are being processed; emphasises that data integrity and security must be guaranteed and unauthorised access, including by law enforcement authorities or foreign governments, prevented; stresses that this also applies to specific processing activities by certain non-governmental services such as banks, insurance companies, schools and hospitals; stresses, furthermore, that all of the aforementioned is of particular importance if data is being transferred between different jurisdictions; therefore takes the view that public authorities as well as non-governmental services and the private sector should rely as far as possible on European clouds when processing sensitive data;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the use of cloud services by public authorities
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the use of cloud services by public authorities requires special consideration; emphasises that data integrity and security must be guaranteed and unauthorised access, including by foreign governments, prevented; stresses that this also applies to specific processing activities by certain non-governmental services such as banks, insurance companies, schools and hospitals;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Urges the Commission to extend current regulation of critical infrastructures to include those cloud services which, in case of disruptions, might have a disruptive impact on society, while guaranteeing the protection of personal and other sensitive data;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises that data integrity and security must be guaranteed and unauthorised access, including by foreign governments, prevented; stresses that this also applies to specific processing activities by certain non-governmental services such as banks, insurance companies, schools and hospitals;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Urges the Commission, when negotiating international agreements that involve the processing of personal data, to take particular note of the risks and challenges associated with 'cloud computing' for fundamental rights, and in particular for the right to privacy and for the protection of personal data; furthermore urges the Commission to take note of the negotiating partner's domestic rules governing law enforcement access to personal data processed through 'cloud computing' services, in particular the requirement that access for law enforcement authorities can only be granted following due process of law and that there should be a legal basis allowing for the access, as well as the requirement to specify the exact conditions of access, the security measures put in place when handing over the data, the rights of individuals, as well as the rules for supervision and for an effective redress mechanism;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that cloud services that fall under third country jurisdiction should provide users located in the EU with a clear and distinguishable warning on the possibility of processed data to be subject to intelligence surveillance by third country authorities, followed by the request for the data subject's explicit consent for the processing of personal data;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses its serious concerns about the works conducted within the Council of Europe by the Cybercrime Convention Committee with a view to developing a Guidance on the interpretation of the Article 32 of the Convention on Cybercrime of 23 November 2001 on "transborder access to stored computer data which consent or where publicly available"1in order to "facilitate its effective use of and implementation in the light of legal, policy and technological developments"; calls on the Commission [and Member States] to actively take part in the works to ensure that any interpretation adopted respects the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is legally binding; __________________ 1 http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/eco nomiccrime/Source/Cybercrime/TCY/TCY %202013/T CY(2013)14transb_elements_protocol_V2. pdf http://www.coe.int/t/DGHL/cooperation/e conomiccrime/cybercrime/default_en.asp
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that notwithstanding the potential and benefits of ‘cloud computing’ for businesses, citizens and the public sector, mainly in terms of cost reduction, it entails significant risks and challenges
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Especially with regard to cross-border traffic, particular attention should be given to US law, like the FISA Amendment Act, allowing US authorities to retrieve data from the cloud without judicial authorisation and allowing the surveillance of cloud data of non-US residents on a mass scale, constituting a clear threat to the privacy of EU citizens; calls for this issue to be addressed in EU legislation, the EU data protection legislation could, for instance, require prominent warnings to be made to data subjects before EU cloud data is exported to US jurisdiction, informing them that their data is exposed to surveillance by a third country's authorities; recalls that all companies directing services at EU citizens should comply with EU rules, regardless of the location from where they provide services and that EU data subjects should be able to enforce their rights;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Urges the Commission to stimulate the development of cloud computing platforms suited for users from countries with oppressive regimes, to allow them to express their opinion and access information freely and without fear of reprisals;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Underlines that particular attention has to be paid to small and medium enterprises which increasingly rely on 'cloud computing' technology when processing personal data and which might not always have the resources or the expertise to adequately address security challenges;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses that the qualification of data controller and processor need to be appropriately reflected by the level of control over the means of processing, in order to clearly allocate the responsibilities for the protection of personal data with the use of cloud computing;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Underlines the importance of digital literacy among all citizens and urges Member States to develop concepts of how to promote safe use of the Internet including of 'cloud computing' services;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Stresses that all the principles laid down in European data protection law, such as fairness and lawfulness, purpose limitation, proportionality, accuracy, limited data retention periods, must be fully taken into account for the processing of personal data by cloud computing service providers;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Underlines the importance of effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative sanctions where 'cloud computing' services do not comply with EU data protection standards;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Stresses that the data protection impact of each cloud computing service must currently be assessed on an ad hoc basis, in order to define the most appropriate safeguards that must be implemented;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) 4e. Stresses that a European cloud service provider should always act in conformity with EU data protection law, even if this conflicts with instructions by a client or controller established in a third country or when the data subjects concerned are (solely) residents of third countries;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 f (new) 4f. Stresses the need to address the challenges raised by cloud computing, in particular government intelligence surveillance and the necessary safeguards, at an international level;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that notwithstanding the potential and benefits of ‘cloud computing’ for businesses, citizens and the public sector, it entails significant risks and challenges, particularly for fundamental rights, and in particular for the right to privacy and the protection of personal data, and by increasing impact in case of disruptions;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 g (new) 4g. Stresses that EU citizens subject to intelligence surveillance by third country authorities should enjoy - at least - the same safeguards and remedies as the citizens of the third country concerned;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5.
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Urges the Commission to put forward a more holistic communication on cloud computing, taking into account the interests of all stakeholders and containing
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 1 –
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – guidelines to ensure full compliance with the EU's fundamental rights
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – guidelines to ensure full compliance with the EU’s fundamental rights and data protection obligations, in particular to protect children in the digital world;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – guidelines to ensure full compliance with the EU’s fundamental rights and data protection obligations, paying particular attention to the more vulnerable user categories;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 2 – limitative conditions under which cloud data
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 3 – safeguards against illegal access by foreign and domestic entities, for instance by amending procurement requirements and applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/961 to counteract foreign laws that might result in massive illegal transfers of the cloud data of EU citizens and residents;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that notwithstanding the potential and benefits of ‘cloud computing’ for businesses, citizens
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 3 a (new) - proposals on how to define 'transfer' of personal data and on how to update standard contractual clauses that are tailored to the cloud environment as 'cloud computing' often involves massive flows of data from the cloud clients to cloud providers' servers and data centres involving many different parties and crossing borders between EU and non-EU countries;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 4 – proposals
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 5 – proposals to
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – indent 5 a (new) - measures to address the existing imbalance in the cloud services market between the service providers and most of the users of their services;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new) - promoting research on how current EU legislative frameworks and international agreements fit particular cloud computing services scenarios; to measure both the economic and the environmental impact of cloud computing as there are still few studies on these aspects;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that notwithstanding the potential and benefits of ‘cloud computing’ for businesses, citizens and the public sector, it also entails
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes the view that access to a safe Internet is a fundamental right of every citizen and that 'cloud computing' will continue to play an important role in this aspect; reiterates, therefore, its call on the Commission and on the Council to unequivocally recognise digital freedoms as fundamental rights and as indispensable prerequisites for enjoying universal human rights;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Reiterates that, as a general rule, the level of data protection in a 'cloud computing' environment must not be inferior to that required in any other data- processing context;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that EU data protection law fully applies to cloud computing services operating in the EU and
source: PE-513.269
2013/09/02
JURI
25 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Commission to take action to further harmonise laws across the Member States in order to avoid jurisdictional confusion and fragmentation and to
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Points out that the right to privacy is a fundamental right;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Stresses that new cloud computing services must be developed in a manner that ensures a high level of personal data protection;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Calls for the establishment of a European seal to show, where the personal data of European citizens is transferred to third countries, that the businesses and third countries involved comply with EU law and uphold the fundamental right to privacy;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary steps to develop European cloud computing that upholds the principles and values of the EU, and to foster cooperation between private operators for the same purpose;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to establish a clear legal framework in the field of copyright
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Maintains that the advent of cloud computing must not compromise the right of European artists to receive fair payment or compensation for the use of their work;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. With regard to the manner in which copyright works are stored by cloud computing services, and to the purpose of such storage, wonders whether these services can be considered to be the same as traditional and digital recording and storage media and equipment;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission to look into how the cloud storage of copyright works affects royalty collection systems, and, more specifically, the ways in which private copying levies are imposed;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that private copying levies remain relevant with regard to some cloud computing services;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to work together with the Member States to develop European best practice models for contracts, or ‘model contracts’, that will ensure complete transparency by providing all terms and conditions in a very clear
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Commission to take action to further harmonise laws across the Member States in order to avoid jurisdictional confusion and fragmentation and to improve the transparency of the digital single market, in particular by eliminating gaps and weaknesses in applicable EU legislation, notably the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and the Unfair Contract Terms Directive in terms of consumer protection, and the E- Commerce Directive when it comes to exemptions from private copy levies;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5а. Highlights the importance of cloud computing for SMEs – particularly those established in countries facing economic difficulties or in remote or outermost areas – as a means of combating their isolation and making them more competitive, as well as for public authorities, enabling them to make their services more efficient and flexible by reducing expenditure on information technology infrastructure;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to develop, together with stakeholders,
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to consider further the role of cloud computing for SMEs and to consider an appropriate legal framework to allow SMEs to increase their growth and productivity using cloud computing, as SMEs can benefit from reduced upfront costs and better access to analytics tools, allowing for increase growth and job creation;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to promote the development of decentralised, freeware-based services that enable European citizens to regain control over their personal data and communication by means of point-to-point encryption;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes the urgent need for a clear and uniform European legislation for cloud computing to ensure a competitive European environment, increasing innovation and boosting growth;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to review
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission also to review other EU legislation to address gaps related to cloud computing; calls, in particular, for the revision of the intellectual property rights regime, the Copyright Directive, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, the Unfair Contract Terms Directive and the E-Commerce Directive, which are the most relevant pieces of EU legislation that apply to cloud computing, in order to remedy the fact that the necessary standardisation in the single European market is lacking, owing to the diversity of the corresponding legislation across the Union, and to set out clear rules on intellectual property rights (IPR);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to review other EU legislation to address gaps related to cloud computing; calls, in particular, for the
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes the importance of considering the legal framework for cloud computing with the current review of the EU Data Protection rules, ensuring clear rules but more importantly greater confidence for users;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for the proposal for a regulation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data to be adopted without delay;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to continue working closely on the revision of the EU Data Protection rules as these are essential for a secure legal framework, allowing data portability to operate in a highly protected environment resulting in greater data interoperability;
source: PE-516.886
2013/09/06
ITRE
62 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the user benefits of cloud
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the development of cloud services is encountering particularly serious challenges in rural and thinly- populated areas where the necessary infrastructure is often insufficiently developed;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the cloud also brings risks to users, related in particular to sensitive data, and whereas the users need to be aware of them;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas cloud services oblige users to hand over information to th
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the increased use of cloud services provided by a limited number of large providers means that increasing amounts of information is aggregated in the hands of those providers, thus magnifying their efficiencies, but also increasing the risks of catastrophic losses of information, of centralised points of failure that could undermine the stability of the internet and of access to the information by third parties;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the responsibilities and liabilities of all the stakeholders involved in the cloud computing services should be clarified in particular concerning security and respect of data protection requirements;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas for business users, standardised cloud services can, if they meet the particular needs of the user, be an attractive means of converting capital cost to operating expense and of enabling fast availability and scaling of additional storage and processing capacity;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas, from a security perspective, the introduction of cloud services means that the responsibility for maintaining the security of information belonging to each individual user
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. Whereas the development of cloud services will increase the amount of transmitted data, the demand for bandwidth and the need for higher upload speeds and for more availability of high speed broadband;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to ETSI's work on a cloud standards mapping
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the achievement of Europe's Digital Agenda targets, in particular broadband uptake and access for all, cross- border public services and research and innovation goals, is a necessary step if the EU is fully to reap the benefits that cloud computing has to offer;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas there were some recent developments regarding security breaches and in particular the PRISM spying scandal;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M b (new) Mb. whereas there is a lack of server farms on European soil;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's communication on unleashing the potential of cloud computing in Europe but considers that a legislative instrument would have been more adequate with the ambitious goals such a strategy advocates;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that policies enabling high- capacity and secure communications infrastructure are a crucial element for all
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that policies enabling high- capacity and secure communications infrastructure are a crucial element for all services relying on communications, including cloud services, and deeply regrets the Council's proposed cuts to the budget for Union broadband funding, which will lead to detrimental outcomes for the EU;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that policies enabling high- capacity and secure communications infrastructure are a crucial element for all services relying on communications, including cloud services
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that cloud services must offer security and reliability commensurate to the increased risks flowing from the concentration of data and information in the hands of a limited number of providers;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that Union law should be
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. stresses that a strategy on cloud computing should encompass collateral aspects such as energy consumption of the data centres and related environmental issues;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas remote computing services in various forms, now commonly known as ‘cloud computing’, are not new
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that, given the economic potential of the cloud for increasing Europe’s global competitiveness, it can become a powerful instrument for growth and employment, but that there are particular challenges in rural areas where the necessary infrastructure is often insufficiently developed; stresses, therefore, that the development of cloud services, in the absence of functioning broadband infrastructure, risks widening the digital divide between densely and thinly populated areas, which will make territorial cohesion and regional economic growth still harder to achieve;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. underlines the need for more e-skills of users and training to show the benefit that can be brought by the cloud; reminds of the necessary creation of more qualification schemes for specialists managing cloud computing;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Insists on the positive impact on SMEs of cloud computing services which by allowing rental of computing power and storage, contributes to the reduction of fixed costs;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Regrets the indications of massive, pervasive and indiscriminate governmental
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Notes that some features may have to be introduced on the radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment layer in order to prevent the infringement of personal data and privacy rights of the user, or confidential business rights of an enterprise, in such a way that technological innovation and the meeting of the needs of a free-market economy are spurred, rather than hindered;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 1b. Calls for the introduction of regulatory measures to ensure responsible vulnerability disclosure in a short, but reasonable, time-limit, thereby effectively providing an incentive for security flaws and accidental errors to get fixed;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point ii (ii) sponsor research in
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – point ii a (new) (iia) involve ENISA in verifying the minimum security and privacy standards of cloud computing services offered to European consumers and particularly to the public sector;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Emphasises the importance of ensuring a competitive and transparent Union market in order to provide all Union users with secure, sustainable, affordable and reliable services; calls for a simple, transparent method to identify security flaws in such a way that service providers on the European market have a sufficient and appropriate incentive to remedy such flaws;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Public procurement and procurement of innovative solutions and the cloud
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas cloud computing has nonetheless attracted attention in recent years owing to the development of new and innovative large-scale business models, a strong push by cloud vendors, technological innovations and increased computing capabilities, lower prices and high-speed communications, as well as to the potential economic and efficiency, including the consumption of energy, benefits that cloud services offer all kinds of users;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that the take-up of cloud services by the public sector has the potential to reduce costs for public administrations and provide more efficient services to citizens, whilst the digital leverage effect to all sectors of the economy would be extremely beneficial. The private sector can also take advantage of those cloud services for the procurement of innovative solutions;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Encourages public administrations to consider
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Notes that because of increased use of cloud services by the public sector, citizens must be given the options to explicitly opt in or oppose to the use of their data in cloud services. This right should be particularly explicit in the case of children and eHealth services, since children are not able to make decisions for themselves;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to take the lead in developing and promulgating standards and specifications supporting
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to take the lead in developing and promulgating standards and specifications supporting a safe, reliable and secure cloud; stresses that reliability, security and protection of data is needed for consumer confidence and competitiveness;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to take the lead in developing and promulgating standards and specifications supporting a safe, reliable, fully interoperable and secure cloud;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to take the lead in developing and promulgating standards and specifications supporting a safe, reliable
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses that standards are based on examples of best practices;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the deployment of cloud services can contribute to reduce the isolation of the most remote areas;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Insists that standards should enable easy and complete portability and a high degree of interoperability between cloud services
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Insists that standards should enable easy and complete data and service portability and a high degree of interoperability between cloud services;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to ensure that consumer devices should not make use of cloud services by default or be restricted to any specific cloud service provider;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission to propose that Directive 99/5/EC on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity is amended in such a way that the security and confidentiality of correspondence and communications is seen as an essential requirement in all radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment, in order to provide a valuable base for European equipment manufacturers to cultivate their own particular niche;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to raise awareness of the consumers of all risks related to the use of cloud services;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the consumer, when prompted to accept or is otherwise offered a cloud service, is first
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Commission to explore appropriate measures to develop a minimum acceptable level of consumer rights in relation to cloud services, covering issues such as privacy, data storage in third countries, liability for data losses and other matters of significant interest to consumers;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Stresses that the information thus provided should identify, among other things, who the ultimate provider of the service is and how the service is financed; stresses, furthermore, that if the service is financed by using users' information to target advertising or to enable others to
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Stresses that the information should be in a standardised, portable, easily comprehensible and comparable format;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the impact of cloud storage of protected works on copyright collection systems, and particularly on licence fee mechanisms for private copying;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the vendor benefits of cloud services consist of e.g. service fees, monetisation of excess computing resources and the possibility of a captive customer base
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Regrets the current lack of effective remedies for users in case of lack of conformity with the contracts;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Calls for systematic consumers information regarding the processing activities of personal data in the contract proposal as well as a compulsory users' consent before changing the terms of the contract;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new) 27c. Stresses the obvious interest for the EU in having more server farms on its soil, from a dual perspective: industrial policy, allowing enhanced synergies with the NGA roll-out objectives of the Digital Agenda; and trust through European sovereignty over its data protection regime.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the vendor benefits of cloud services consist of e.g. service fees, monetisation of excess computing resources and the possibility of a captive customer base and of secondary uses of user information, such as for advertising, with due regard for the requirements of personal data privacy and protection;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the vendor benefits of cloud services consist of e.g. service fees, monetisation of underutilised and excess computing resources, economies of scale and the possibility of a captive customer base and of secondary uses of user information, such as for advertising;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the user benefits of cloud services consist of potentially lower costs, convenience, reliability, scaleability and security;
source: PE-516.774
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.198&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-504198_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.114New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-506114_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.774New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-516774_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.203&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-504203_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE514.601&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-514601_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0529/COM_COM(2012)0529_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0529/COM_COM(2012)0529_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0353&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0353_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0535New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0535_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/10792New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/selected_topics |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0529:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0529/COM_COM(2012)0529_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0529/COM_COM(2012)0529_EN.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0529:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0529/COM_COM(2012)0529_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0529/COM_COM(2012)0529_EN.pdf |
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fe6cfd1d1c56f23000000New
4f1ac713b819f25efd000065 |
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fe6cfd1d1c56f23000000New
4f1ac713b819f25efd000065 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fe6cfd1d1c56f23000000New
4f1ac713b819f25efd000065 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|