BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


2014/2148(INI) European film in the digital era

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT WENTA Bogdan Brunon (icon: PPE PPE) KAMMEREVERT Petra (icon: S&D S&D), MCCLARKIN Emma (icon: ECR ECR), DIACONU Mircea (icon: ALDE ALDE), TRÜPEL Helga (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ADINOLFI Isabella (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2015/09/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
SP(2015)461
2015/04/28
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
Results of vote in Parliament
2015/04/28
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 607 votes to 50, with 32 abstentions, a resolution on European film in the digital era.

The European film industry is one of the world’s largest producers (1500 films released in 2014) but is characterised by a heterogeneous structure in terms of both funding and type of production . European films are characterised by their quality, originality and diversity, but suffer from limited promotion and distribution across the Union.

Given that films are goods that are both cultural and economic, Parliament made the following recommendations:

Promotion, cross-border distribution and accessibility : Parliament encouraged the European film industry to pursue the development of innovative services, new business models and distribution channels to improve the cross-border availability of European films in the Union and, beyond that, to allow viewers across the Union to have access to an ever greater range of films across a growing number of platforms.

The resolution stressed the need for:

greater legal offers of high quality , and for awareness-raising among young people to counter the impact of unauthorised use of creative works; further exploration of the development of cross-border portability of audiovisual services, taking account of the rapid growth of Video on Demand (VOD) and online transactions across the Union; targeted marketing across the Union that takes into account the cultural specificities of European audiences; greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films; promote and support European co-productions; encourage the production, distribution and promotion on the European and global markets of high-quality European TV series which have had growing success; strengthening measures for better optimisation of the price of cinema tickets , development of innovative promotions and subscription offers that would help ensure the attractiveness of, and access of all to, cinemas.

Parliament noted the role played by MEDIA in supporting subtitling and dubbing and supports initiatives such as the Commission’s pilot project ‘Fostering European integration through culture’, aimed at reinforcing the provision of subtitled European films by providing new subtitled versions of selected TV programmes across all Europe.

Audience development : Members encourage distributors and cinema exhibitors to increase the visibility and availability of non-national European films in order to reach wider audiences. They call on the Commission and the Member States to provide support to equip all screens with digital projection and sound technology in order to prevent the disappearance of small and independent cinemas , in particular in small towns and less-developed regions.

Level playing field : Parliament recalled that the Audiovisual Media Services Directive obliges Member States to ensure that on-demand service providers promote European works. However, the Directive has been implemented in an uneven manner with different levels of legal requirements, and that this could result in providers establishing themselves in Member States with the lowest requirements.

Members also stated that all those who benefit economically from European cinematographic works, even if indirectly, through direct provision, marketing or dissemination, including links or provision by means of video-on-demand, should contribute financially to the making of European films.

The Commission is called on to take the above into account when proposing a review of the current legal framework, in order to ensure a level playing field on the European audiovisual market with fair and equal conditions for all providers.

Funding : Parliament stressed that to increase support for development, promotion and international distribution, public funding for production and distribution needs to be better balanced .

Member States are invited to:

increase public funding in order to support at an early stage the distribution and promotion of national films abroad, as well as of non-national European films; promote incentives to facilitate the production, distribution, availability and attractiveness of European films; applying the same reduced VAT rates to cultural audiovisual works whether sold online or offline stimulates the growth of new services and platforms; highlight the role to be played by Creative Europe’s Guarantee Facility , in terms of facilitating access to finance for SMEs in the cultural and creative sectors; urge greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films, increase awareness of Europe’s cultural and linguistic diversity amongst viewers, and improve mutual understanding.

The resolution:

called on the Member States to reinforce their efforts to improve media literacy , and in particular film literacy, in school curricula and institutions of cultural education; supported innovative projects and practices such as the Commission's preparatory action on the circulation of European films in the digital era. called on Member States to ensure the digitisation of cinematographic works, given that only 1.5% of the European film heritage has been digitised.

Lastly, Parliament welcomed the Commission’s initiative to establish a European Film Forum, in order to facilitate a structured dialogue with all stakeholders in the audiovisual sector on the challenges currently faced by the sector in the digital era.

Documents
T8-0108/2015
2015/04/28
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/04/27
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/04/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report by Bogdan Brunon WENTA (PPE, PL) on European film in the digital era.

Films are goods that are both cultural and economic. They contribute greatly to the European economy whilst helping shape European identities by reflecting cultural and linguistic diversity. The European film industry is one of the world’s largest producers (1500 films released in 2014) but is characterised by a heterogeneous structure in terms of both funding and type of production. European films are characterised by their quality, originality and diversity, but suffer from limited promotion and distribution across the Union.

In this context, the parliamentary committee made the following recommendations:

Promotion, cross-border distribution and accessibility: Members encouraged the European film industry to pursue the development of innovative services, new business models and distribution channels to improve the cross-border availability of European films in the Union and, beyond that, to allow viewers across the Union to have access to an ever greater range of films across a growing number of platforms.

The report stressed the need for:

· greater legal offers of high quality , and for awareness-raising among young people to counter the impact of unauthorised use of creative works;

· targeted marketing across the Union that takes into account the cultural specificities of European audiences;

· greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films;

· promote and support European co-productions;

· encourage the production, distribution and promotion on the European and global markets of high-quality European TV series which have had growing success;

· strengthening measures for better optimisation of the price of cinema tickets , development of innovative promotions and subscription offers that would help ensure the attractiveness of, and access of all to, cinemas.

The report notes the role played by MEDIA in supporting subtitling and dubbing and supports initiatives such as the Commission’s pilot project ‘Fostering European integration through culture’, aimed at reinforcing the provision of subtitled European films by providing new subtitled versions of selected TV programmes across all Europe.

Audience development: Members encourage distributors and cinema exhibitors to increase the visibility and availability of non-national European films in order to reach wider audiences. They call on the Commission and the Member States to provide support to equip all screens with digital projection and sound technology in order to prevent the disappearance of small and independent cinemas.

Level playing field: Members recall that the Audiovisual Media Services Directive obliges Member States to ensure that on-demand service providers promote European works. However, the Directive has been implemented in an uneven manner with different levels of legal requirements, and that this could result in providers establishing themselves in Member States with the lowest requirements.

The Commission is called on to take the above into account when proposing a review of the current legal framework, in order to ensure a level playing field on the European audiovisual market with fair and equal conditions for all providers

Funding: Members considers it necessary to increase funding in real terms for film distribution, promotion and marketing without this being at the expense of funding for production

Member States are invited to:

· to increase public funding in order to support at an early stage the distribution and promotion of national films abroad, as well as of non-national European films;

· to promote incentives to facilitate the production, distribution, availability and attractiveness of European films; applying the same reduced VAT rates to cultural audiovisual works whether sold online or offline stimulates the growth of new services and platforms;

· highlight the role to be played by Creative Europe’s Guarantee Facility , in terms of facilitating access to finance for SMEs in the cultural and creative sectors.

The report:

· calls on the Member States to reinforce their efforts to improve media literacy , and in particular film literacy, in school curricula and institutions of cultural education;

· supports innovative projects and practices such as the Commission's preparatory action on the circulation of European films in the digital era.

· calls on Member States to ensure the digitisation of cinematographic works.

Lastly, it welcomes the Commission’s initiative to establish a European Film Forum, in order to facilitate a structured dialogue with all stakeholders in the audiovisual sector on the challenges currently faced by the sector in the digital era.

Documents
A8-0123/2015
2015/03/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/01/30
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
PE546.779
2014/12/17
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
PE544.209
2014/11/24
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/10/16
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
COM(2014)0272
2014/09/10
   EP - WENTA Bogdan Brunon (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2014/05/15
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of a Communication entitled " European film in the digital era Bridging cultural diversity and competitiveness".

BACKGROUND: worldwide praise is given to the European film heritage. However, most European films do not reach all their potential audience in Europe and even less so in the global market. For the most part, films stay on national markets but, even there, some fail to secure any other local distribution channels.

In this context, t he digital revolution offers more possibilities and flexibility for distribution and is having a fundamental impact on audience behaviour. It is essential therefore to adapt to the digital era and use its potential to keep existing audiences and reach new ones, and to build bridges between cultural diversity and competitiveness.

The Communication provides a stocktaking of recent developments in the film sector and identifies current challenges in public policies impacting the film sector .

It also highlights existing EU instruments that could contribute to the process of adaptation to these challenges.

CONTENT: the Communication aims at improving the complementarity between the Member States and the Union policies in the area of cinema heritage and its promotion. In particular, it promotes common directions to better embrace the opportunities and address the challenges related to the digital shift while taking account of cultural and linguistic diversity and the varieties of the national audiovisual landscapes.

It stresses the need for a joint effort to strengthen the global efficiency of existing funding tools for the competitiveness and diversity of the European film sector.

The main trends : in the EU, European films represent on average 62.52% of releases and account for 32.9% of admissions. Box office receipts and admissions of European films fall far behind those of US productions. The C ommunication underlines that only a small minority of European films are released in cinemas outside of Europe (8% in 2010).

At the same time, television is still the most widely used platform for watching films. In 2011, 41 % of the almost 122 000 feature films shown on TV in Europe were of European origin.

While DVD is declining, Video on Demand (VoD) is a relatively new form of distribution expected to grow significantly in the coming years. In 2012, the VoD market recorded a growth rate of 59% in

Germany and 14.7% in France.

The Communication indicates that while cinema attendance has remained stable in recent years, that the Europeans go to the cinema less than once a month (39% never go to the cinema). Apart from in cinemas, Europeans watch films on free TV (79% of the population), on DVD (67 %). M obile viewing therefore represents an important market especially as viewers increasingly expect to watch content anytime, anywhere and on every device. Average video online viewing per viewer, while still relatively low in the main EU markets, increased between 155% and 200% over the period 2008 to 2011

· structural weaknesses of the European film sector : the Communication highlights the structural weaknesses of the sector which prevent it reaching larger audiences:

· fragmentation of production and financing : the European film sector is composed mostly of small and micro enterprises relying on limited intangible assets. A large majority of European films are not profitable and do not recoup their investments. It is therefore difficult for European companies to become more stable. In addition, the complex film production financing system is being challenged by changes in distribution and consumption, triggered by digital technologies;

· limited incentives to internationalise projects : more generally, the film sector does not mobilise appropriate finance for projects with an international focus. Projects therefore tend to target domestic audiences. The potential of co-production to increase the outreach of a given film could be better exploited; too many co-productions still lack a clear strategy for distribution in the countries concerned and beyond;

· more funds for distribution and promotion : the focus of film policies on support to production overshadows the potential of distribution across all possible platforms. The rigid system of release windows (passage to other media of viewing cinema films) prevents the development and use of new, innovative release strategies and business models:

· too slow to digitise : Europe is lagging behind in terms of digitisation: only 1.5% of film heritage has been digitised. This is explained by a lack of funding and high costs — both in money and time — for clearing rights;

· shortcomings in entrepreneurial skills : initial training for cinema professionals often fails to deliver the necessary entrepreneurial and business skills. Relations between film schools and business are weak and training is still not offering sufficient opportunities to gain an international perspective and contacts.

Commission proposals : a concerted effort at all levels would be needed in order to overcome these structural weaknesses. A series of measures are proposed which can be summarised as follows:

1) Reviewing the financing environment : a successful European film industry needs a rebalancing of spending between production, distribution and promotion of films, including progress via: i) strengthening public funding schemes by optimising its overall added value of funds granted , for example, ensuring that the project is developed in such a way as to reach its targeted audience or ensuring that publicly funded projects are accompanied by a well-designed distribution and marketing strategy. In this regard, the new MEDIA programme may make a useful contribution; ii) to better involve new actors in the value chain such as, for example, Netflix which may invest primarily in series but also increasingly in other genres like documentaries and comic monologues ( stand-up comedies ) ; iii) to allow access to private financing through EU financial instruments, such as, for example, guarantee funds opening up access to private funding, as provided by the programme COSME ;

2) Designing an innovative business environment : rapid developments in the sector call for sufficient flexibility to allow operators to experiment and to test new approaches and business models. Flexibility is particularly needed on release windows (for example, after cinema release, for VoDs and on-line broadcast) to enable the testing, developing and use of alternative release strategies adapted to different types of films and maximising complementarities of different platforms to reach out to audiences. This could secure additional audience share for those European films and maximise the effect of marketing efforts. Simultaneous or more coordinated release in cinemas across borders or more rapid access for online services could also be explored;

3) Strengthening the creative environment : cooperation among European film schools (on curricula or mobility) and creative partnerships between schools and businesses are to be encouraged. The objective should be to promote a better match of training and skills with the needs of industry (including entrepreneurial, ICT, advertising and marketing skills). It should also aim to bring a more international and global audience perspective to the creative part of the industry. Creative cooperation should also be encouraged between the film sector and other sectors.(TV fiction, video games and cross media).

Finally, measures are planned to enlarge the target audience . Information on audience preferences and consumer behaviour could help to better identify and target factors that can contribute to the success of a film.

There is also a need to promote the visibility and discoverability of European films , and to engage with audiences. Film education also constitutes a major investment for tomorrow’s audiences. Here, the " Creative Europe " programme may contribute to improve approaches in this field.

Next steps : in the face of rapid evolution in the sector, there is a need to promote a European debate and open a dialogue with all stakeholders — public authorities and private sector — about film policy in Europe. The debate should focus on the shared objectives of making the rich diversity of European films more accessible.

To this end, the Commission intends to launch a European Film Forum , a process building on existing instruments, aiming at promoting the exchange of experience and practices, and the studying and sharing of knowledge on issues of common interest. The main focus of the Forum should be to debate public policies for the film sector and to involve — on a voluntary basis — interested parties.

Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(2014)0272

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0123/2015 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta - Résolution #

2015/04/28 Outcome: +: 607, -: 50, 0: 32
DE ES FR PL GB IT RO BE CZ HU AT PT EL BG SK HR IE LT SE LV FI SI EE CY MT LU NL DK
Total
89
52
71
49
52
71
30
21
21
19
18
19
20
13
13
11
10
9
18
8
9
8
6
6
6
5
23
11
icon: PPE PPE
207

Germany PPE

33

Spain PPE

17

France PPE

Against (1)

Michel DANTIN
19

Poland PPE

23

Italy PPE

17

Romania PPE

13

Belgium PPE

4

Czechia PPE

7

Hungary PPE

11

Austria PPE

5

Portugal PPE

5

Greece PPE

4

Bulgaria PPE

6

Slovakia PPE

6

Croatia PPE

5

Ireland PPE

4

Lithuania PPE

1

Sweden PPE

4

Latvia PPE

4

Finland PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

5

Estonia PPE

For (1)

Tunne KELAM
1

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Netherlands PPE

4
icon: S&D S&D
180

Germany S&D

24

Spain S&D

12

France S&D

13

Poland S&D

5

United Kingdom S&D

20

Italy S&D

29

Romania S&D

14

Belgium S&D

4

Czechia S&D

4

Hungary S&D

4

Austria S&D

5

Portugal S&D

8

Greece S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

Nessa CHILDERS
1

Lithuania S&D

2

Sweden S&D

5

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

Tanja FAJON
1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

Marju LAURISTIN
1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

Mady DELVAUX
1

Netherlands S&D

3

Denmark S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Germany ALDE

4

Spain ALDE

8

France ALDE

7

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Belgium ALDE

6

Czechia ALDE

4

Austria ALDE

For (1)

Angelika MLINAR
1

Portugal ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

Marian HARKIN
1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Ivo VAJGL
1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

Charles GOERENS
1

Netherlands ALDE

7

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
67

Germany ECR

8

Poland ECR

Abstain (1)

Mirosław PIOTROWSKI
19

United Kingdom ECR

20

Belgium ECR

4

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

Notis MARIAS
1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

Ruža TOMAŠIĆ
1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

Roberts ZĪLE
1

Finland ECR

For (1)

Jussi HALLA-AHO
1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Bas BELDER
1

Denmark ECR

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Germany Verts/ALE

12

Spain Verts/ALE

4

France Verts/ALE

5

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Davor ŠKRLEC
1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

Bronis ROPĖ
1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Igor ŠOLTES
1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Indrek TARAND
1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

Claude TURMES
1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

Margrete AUKEN
1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
50

Germany GUE/NGL

7

Spain GUE/NGL

11

France GUE/NGL

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Marisa MATIAS
4

Greece GUE/NGL

6

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

Malin BJÖRK
1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

Merja KYLLÖNEN
1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

Rina Ronja KARI
1
icon: NI NI
45

Germany NI

For (1)

Udo VOIGT
1

France NI

22

Poland NI

Against (1)

Michał MARUSIK
1

Italy NI

5

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

Gerolf ANNEMANS
1

Hungary NI

2

Austria NI

4

Greece NI

5

Netherlands NI

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
30

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

6

Italy EFDD

17

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

Petr MACH
1

Lithuania EFDD

2

Sweden EFDD

2
AmendmentsDossier
101 2014/2148(INI)
2015/01/30 CULT 101 amendments...
source: 546.779

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2021-12-18Show (12) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/shadows/3
name
MICHELS Martina
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE544.209
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-544209_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.779
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-546779_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2015-04-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0123_EN.html title: A8-0123/2015
summary
events/3
date
2015-04-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0123_EN.html title: A8-0123/2015
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150427&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0108_EN.html title: T8-0108/2015
summary
events/6
date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0108_EN.html title: T8-0108/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
2020-01-19Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon date: 2014-09-10T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
docs/2/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0123&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0123_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0108
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0108_EN.html
2019-07-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
2019-07-06Show (21) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 2014-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0272 title: COM(2014)0272 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014DC0272:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm title: Communications Networks, Content and Technology Commissioner: OETTINGER Günther type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2014-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea group: GUE/NGL name: MICHELS Martina group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2014-09-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • date: 2015-03-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea group: GUE/NGL name: MICHELS Martina group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2014-09-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • date: 2015-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0123&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0123/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150427&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25560&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0108 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0108/2015 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: OETTINGER Günther
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
docs
  • date: 2014-12-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE544.209 title: PE544.209 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-01-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.779 title: PE546.779 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=25560&j=0&l=en title: SP(2015)461 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2014-10-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0272 title: COM(2014)0272 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2014-05-15T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0272 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2014)0272 summary: PURPOSE: presentation of a Communication entitled " European film in the digital era Bridging cultural diversity and competitiveness". BACKGROUND: worldwide praise is given to the European film heritage. However, most European films do not reach all their potential audience in Europe and even less so in the global market. For the most part, films stay on national markets but, even there, some fail to secure any other local distribution channels. In this context, t he digital revolution offers more possibilities and flexibility for distribution and is having a fundamental impact on audience behaviour. It is essential therefore to adapt to the digital era and use its potential to keep existing audiences and reach new ones, and to build bridges between cultural diversity and competitiveness. The Communication provides a stocktaking of recent developments in the film sector and identifies current challenges in public policies impacting the film sector . It also highlights existing EU instruments that could contribute to the process of adaptation to these challenges. CONTENT: the Communication aims at improving the complementarity between the Member States and the Union policies in the area of cinema heritage and its promotion. In particular, it promotes common directions to better embrace the opportunities and address the challenges related to the digital shift while taking account of cultural and linguistic diversity and the varieties of the national audiovisual landscapes. It stresses the need for a joint effort to strengthen the global efficiency of existing funding tools for the competitiveness and diversity of the European film sector. The main trends : in the EU, European films represent on average 62.52% of releases and account for 32.9% of admissions. Box office receipts and admissions of European films fall far behind those of US productions. The C ommunication underlines that only a small minority of European films are released in cinemas outside of Europe (8% in 2010). At the same time, television is still the most widely used platform for watching films. In 2011, 41 % of the almost 122 000 feature films shown on TV in Europe were of European origin. While DVD is declining, Video on Demand (VoD) is a relatively new form of distribution expected to grow significantly in the coming years. In 2012, the VoD market recorded a growth rate of 59% in Germany and 14.7% in France. The Communication indicates that while cinema attendance has remained stable in recent years, that the Europeans go to the cinema less than once a month (39% never go to the cinema). Apart from in cinemas, Europeans watch films on free TV (79% of the population), on DVD (67 %). M obile viewing therefore represents an important market especially as viewers increasingly expect to watch content anytime, anywhere and on every device. Average video online viewing per viewer, while still relatively low in the main EU markets, increased between 155% and 200% over the period 2008 to 2011 · structural weaknesses of the European film sector : the Communication highlights the structural weaknesses of the sector which prevent it reaching larger audiences: · fragmentation of production and financing : the European film sector is composed mostly of small and micro enterprises relying on limited intangible assets. A large majority of European films are not profitable and do not recoup their investments. It is therefore difficult for European companies to become more stable. In addition, the complex film production financing system is being challenged by changes in distribution and consumption, triggered by digital technologies; · limited incentives to internationalise projects : more generally, the film sector does not mobilise appropriate finance for projects with an international focus. Projects therefore tend to target domestic audiences. The potential of co-production to increase the outreach of a given film could be better exploited; too many co-productions still lack a clear strategy for distribution in the countries concerned and beyond; · more funds for distribution and promotion : the focus of film policies on support to production overshadows the potential of distribution across all possible platforms. The rigid system of release windows (passage to other media of viewing cinema films) prevents the development and use of new, innovative release strategies and business models: · too slow to digitise : Europe is lagging behind in terms of digitisation: only 1.5% of film heritage has been digitised. This is explained by a lack of funding and high costs — both in money and time — for clearing rights; · shortcomings in entrepreneurial skills : initial training for cinema professionals often fails to deliver the necessary entrepreneurial and business skills. Relations between film schools and business are weak and training is still not offering sufficient opportunities to gain an international perspective and contacts. Commission proposals : a concerted effort at all levels would be needed in order to overcome these structural weaknesses. A series of measures are proposed which can be summarised as follows: 1) Reviewing the financing environment : a successful European film industry needs a rebalancing of spending between production, distribution and promotion of films, including progress via: i) strengthening public funding schemes by optimising its overall added value of funds granted , for example, ensuring that the project is developed in such a way as to reach its targeted audience or ensuring that publicly funded projects are accompanied by a well-designed distribution and marketing strategy. In this regard, the new MEDIA programme may make a useful contribution; ii) to better involve new actors in the value chain such as, for example, Netflix which may invest primarily in series but also increasingly in other genres like documentaries and comic monologues ( stand-up comedies ) ; iii) to allow access to private financing through EU financial instruments, such as, for example, guarantee funds opening up access to private funding, as provided by the programme COSME ; 2) Designing an innovative business environment : rapid developments in the sector call for sufficient flexibility to allow operators to experiment and to test new approaches and business models. Flexibility is particularly needed on release windows (for example, after cinema release, for VoDs and on-line broadcast) to enable the testing, developing and use of alternative release strategies adapted to different types of films and maximising complementarities of different platforms to reach out to audiences. This could secure additional audience share for those European films and maximise the effect of marketing efforts. Simultaneous or more coordinated release in cinemas across borders or more rapid access for online services could also be explored; 3) Strengthening the creative environment : cooperation among European film schools (on curricula or mobility) and creative partnerships between schools and businesses are to be encouraged. The objective should be to promote a better match of training and skills with the needs of industry (including entrepreneurial, ICT, advertising and marketing skills). It should also aim to bring a more international and global audience perspective to the creative part of the industry. Creative cooperation should also be encouraged between the film sector and other sectors.(TV fiction, video games and cross media). Finally, measures are planned to enlarge the target audience . Information on audience preferences and consumer behaviour could help to better identify and target factors that can contribute to the success of a film. There is also a need to promote the visibility and discoverability of European films , and to engage with audiences. Film education also constitutes a major investment for tomorrow’s audiences. Here, the " Creative Europe " programme may contribute to improve approaches in this field. Next steps : in the face of rapid evolution in the sector, there is a need to promote a European debate and open a dialogue with all stakeholders — public authorities and private sector — about film policy in Europe. The debate should focus on the shared objectives of making the rich diversity of European films more accessible. To this end, the Commission intends to launch a European Film Forum , a process building on existing instruments, aiming at promoting the exchange of experience and practices, and the studying and sharing of knowledge on issues of common interest. The main focus of the Forum should be to debate public policies for the film sector and to involve — on a voluntary basis — interested parties.
  • date: 2014-11-24T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-01T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0123&language=EN title: A8-0123/2015 summary: The Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report by Bogdan Brunon WENTA (PPE, PL) on European film in the digital era. Films are goods that are both cultural and economic. They contribute greatly to the European economy whilst helping shape European identities by reflecting cultural and linguistic diversity. The European film industry is one of the world’s largest producers (1500 films released in 2014) but is characterised by a heterogeneous structure in terms of both funding and type of production. European films are characterised by their quality, originality and diversity, but suffer from limited promotion and distribution across the Union. In this context, the parliamentary committee made the following recommendations: Promotion, cross-border distribution and accessibility: Members encouraged the European film industry to pursue the development of innovative services, new business models and distribution channels to improve the cross-border availability of European films in the Union and, beyond that, to allow viewers across the Union to have access to an ever greater range of films across a growing number of platforms. The report stressed the need for: · greater legal offers of high quality , and for awareness-raising among young people to counter the impact of unauthorised use of creative works; · targeted marketing across the Union that takes into account the cultural specificities of European audiences; · greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films; · promote and support European co-productions; · encourage the production, distribution and promotion on the European and global markets of high-quality European TV series which have had growing success; · strengthening measures for better optimisation of the price of cinema tickets , development of innovative promotions and subscription offers that would help ensure the attractiveness of, and access of all to, cinemas. The report notes the role played by MEDIA in supporting subtitling and dubbing and supports initiatives such as the Commission’s pilot project ‘Fostering European integration through culture’, aimed at reinforcing the provision of subtitled European films by providing new subtitled versions of selected TV programmes across all Europe. Audience development: Members encourage distributors and cinema exhibitors to increase the visibility and availability of non-national European films in order to reach wider audiences. They call on the Commission and the Member States to provide support to equip all screens with digital projection and sound technology in order to prevent the disappearance of small and independent cinemas. Level playing field: Members recall that the Audiovisual Media Services Directive obliges Member States to ensure that on-demand service providers promote European works. However, the Directive has been implemented in an uneven manner with different levels of legal requirements, and that this could result in providers establishing themselves in Member States with the lowest requirements. The Commission is called on to take the above into account when proposing a review of the current legal framework, in order to ensure a level playing field on the European audiovisual market with fair and equal conditions for all providers Funding: Members considers it necessary to increase funding in real terms for film distribution, promotion and marketing without this being at the expense of funding for production Member States are invited to: · to increase public funding in order to support at an early stage the distribution and promotion of national films abroad, as well as of non-national European films; · to promote incentives to facilitate the production, distribution, availability and attractiveness of European films; applying the same reduced VAT rates to cultural audiovisual works whether sold online or offline stimulates the growth of new services and platforms; · highlight the role to be played by Creative Europe’s Guarantee Facility , in terms of facilitating access to finance for SMEs in the cultural and creative sectors. The report: · calls on the Member States to reinforce their efforts to improve media literacy , and in particular film literacy, in school curricula and institutions of cultural education; · supports innovative projects and practices such as the Commission's preparatory action on the circulation of European films in the digital era. · calls on Member States to ensure the digitisation of cinematographic works. Lastly, it welcomes the Commission’s initiative to establish a European Film Forum, in order to facilitate a structured dialogue with all stakeholders in the audiovisual sector on the challenges currently faced by the sector in the digital era.
  • date: 2015-04-27T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150427&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25560&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0108 title: T8-0108/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 607 votes to 50, with 32 abstentions, a resolution on European film in the digital era. The European film industry is one of the world’s largest producers (1500 films released in 2014) but is characterised by a heterogeneous structure in terms of both funding and type of production . European films are characterised by their quality, originality and diversity, but suffer from limited promotion and distribution across the Union. Given that films are goods that are both cultural and economic, Parliament made the following recommendations: Promotion, cross-border distribution and accessibility : Parliament encouraged the European film industry to pursue the development of innovative services, new business models and distribution channels to improve the cross-border availability of European films in the Union and, beyond that, to allow viewers across the Union to have access to an ever greater range of films across a growing number of platforms. The resolution stressed the need for: greater legal offers of high quality , and for awareness-raising among young people to counter the impact of unauthorised use of creative works; further exploration of the development of cross-border portability of audiovisual services, taking account of the rapid growth of Video on Demand (VOD) and online transactions across the Union; targeted marketing across the Union that takes into account the cultural specificities of European audiences; greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films; promote and support European co-productions; encourage the production, distribution and promotion on the European and global markets of high-quality European TV series which have had growing success; strengthening measures for better optimisation of the price of cinema tickets , development of innovative promotions and subscription offers that would help ensure the attractiveness of, and access of all to, cinemas. Parliament noted the role played by MEDIA in supporting subtitling and dubbing and supports initiatives such as the Commission’s pilot project ‘Fostering European integration through culture’, aimed at reinforcing the provision of subtitled European films by providing new subtitled versions of selected TV programmes across all Europe. Audience development : Members encourage distributors and cinema exhibitors to increase the visibility and availability of non-national European films in order to reach wider audiences. They call on the Commission and the Member States to provide support to equip all screens with digital projection and sound technology in order to prevent the disappearance of small and independent cinemas , in particular in small towns and less-developed regions. Level playing field : Parliament recalled that the Audiovisual Media Services Directive obliges Member States to ensure that on-demand service providers promote European works. However, the Directive has been implemented in an uneven manner with different levels of legal requirements, and that this could result in providers establishing themselves in Member States with the lowest requirements. Members also stated that all those who benefit economically from European cinematographic works, even if indirectly, through direct provision, marketing or dissemination, including links or provision by means of video-on-demand, should contribute financially to the making of European films. The Commission is called on to take the above into account when proposing a review of the current legal framework, in order to ensure a level playing field on the European audiovisual market with fair and equal conditions for all providers. Funding : Parliament stressed that to increase support for development, promotion and international distribution, public funding for production and distribution needs to be better balanced . Member States are invited to: increase public funding in order to support at an early stage the distribution and promotion of national films abroad, as well as of non-national European films; promote incentives to facilitate the production, distribution, availability and attractiveness of European films; applying the same reduced VAT rates to cultural audiovisual works whether sold online or offline stimulates the growth of new services and platforms; highlight the role to be played by Creative Europe’s Guarantee Facility , in terms of facilitating access to finance for SMEs in the cultural and creative sectors; urge greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films, increase awareness of Europe’s cultural and linguistic diversity amongst viewers, and improve mutual understanding. The resolution: called on the Member States to reinforce their efforts to improve media literacy , and in particular film literacy, in school curricula and institutions of cultural education; supported innovative projects and practices such as the Commission's preparatory action on the circulation of European films in the digital era. called on Member States to ensure the digitisation of cinematographic works, given that only 1.5% of the European film heritage has been digitised. Lastly, Parliament welcomed the Commission’s initiative to establish a European Film Forum, in order to facilitate a structured dialogue with all stakeholders in the audiovisual sector on the challenges currently faced by the sector in the digital era.
  • date: 2015-04-28T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm title: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: OETTINGER Günther
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CULT/8/01727
New
  • CULT/8/01727
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.30.01 Audiovisual industry and services
  • 4.45 Common cultural area, cultural diversity
  • 4.45.08 Cultural and artistic activities, books and reading, arts
New
3.30.01
Audiovisual industry and services
3.30.06
Information and communication technologies, digital technologies
4.45
Common cultural area, cultural diversity
4.45.08
Cultural and artistic activities, books and reading, arts
2015-11-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0272:EN
2015-11-04Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0272:EN
activities/5/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25560&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/5/docs/1/text

  • The European Parliament adopted by 607 votes to 50, with 32 abstentions, a resolution on European film in the digital era.

    The European film industry is one of the world’s largest producers (1500 films released in 2014) but is characterised by a heterogeneous structure in terms of both funding and type of production. European films are characterised by their quality, originality and diversity, but suffer from limited promotion and distribution across the Union.

    Given

    films are goods that are both cultural and economic, Parliament made the following recommendations:

    Promotion, cross-border distribution and accessibility: Parliament encouraged the European film industry to pursue the development of innovative services, new business models and distribution channels to improve the cross-border availability of European films in the Union and, beyond that, to allow viewers across the Union to have access to an ever greater range of films across a growing number of platforms.

    The resolution stressed the need for:

    • greater legal offers of high quality, and for awareness-raising among young people to counter the impact of unauthorised use of creative works;
    • further exploration of the development of cross-border portability of audiovisual services, taking account of the rapid growth of Video on Demand (VOD) and online transactions across the Union;
    • targeted marketing across the Union that takes into account the cultural specificities of European audiences;
    • greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films;
    • promote and support European co-productions;
    • encourage the production, distribution and promotion on the European and global markets of high-quality European TV series which have had growing success;
    • strengthening measures for better optimisation of the price of cinema tickets, development of innovative promotions and subscription offers that would help ensure the attractiveness of, and access of all to, cinemas.

    Parliament noted the role played by MEDIA in supporting subtitling and dubbing and supports initiatives such as the Commission’s pilot project ‘Fostering European integration through culture’, aimed at reinforcing the provision of subtitled European films by providing new subtitled versions of selected TV programmes across all Europe.

    Audience development: Members encourage distributors and cinema exhibitors to increase the visibility and availability of non-national European films in order to reach wider audiences. They call on the Commission and the Member States to provide support to equip all screens with digital projection and sound technology in order to prevent the disappearance of small and independent cinemas, in particular in small towns and less-developed regions.

    Level playing field: Parliament recalled that the Audiovisual Media Services Directive obliges Member States to ensure that on-demand service providers promote European works. However, the Directive has been implemented in an uneven manner with different levels of legal requirements, and that this could result in providers establishing themselves in Member States with the lowest requirements.

    Members also stated that all those who benefit economically from European cinematographic works, even if indirectly, through direct provision, marketing or dissemination, including links or provision by means of video-on-demand, should contribute financially to the making of European films.

    The Commission is called on to take the above into account when proposing a review of the current legal framework, in order to ensure a level playing field on the European audiovisual market with fair and equal conditions for all providers.

    Funding: Parliament stressed that to increase support for development, promotion and international distribution, public funding for production and distribution needs to be better balanced.

    Member States are invited to:

    • increase public funding in order to support at an early stage the distribution and promotion of national films abroad, as well as of non-national European films;
    • promote incentives to facilitate the production, distribution, availability and attractiveness of European films; applying the same reduced VAT rates to cultural audiovisual works whether sold online or offline stimulates the growth of new services and platforms;
    • highlight the role to be played by Creative Europe’s Guarantee Facility, in terms of facilitating access to finance for SMEs in the cultural and creative sectors;
    • urge greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films, increase awareness of Europe’s cultural and linguistic diversity amongst viewers, and improve mutual understanding.

    The resolution:

    • called on the Member States to reinforce their efforts to improve media literacy, and in particular film literacy, in school curricula and institutions of cultural education;
    • supported innovative projects and practices such as the Commission's preparatory action on the circulation of European films in the digital era.
    • called on Member States to ensure the digitisation of cinematographic works, given that only 1.5% of the European film heritage has been digitised.

    Lastly, Parliament welcomed the Commission’s initiative to establish a European Film Forum, in order to facilitate a structured dialogue with all stakeholders in the audiovisual sector on the challenges currently faced by the sector in the digital era.
activities/5/docs/1/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0108
activities/5/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
2015-04-30Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150427&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0108/2015
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
2015-04-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
2015-04-25Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3/docs/0/text

  • The Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report by Bogdan Brunon WENTA (PPE, PL) on European film in the digital era.

    Films are goods that are both cultural and economic. They contribute greatly to the European economy whilst helping shape European identities by reflecting cultural and linguistic diversity. The European film industry is one of the world’s largest producers (1500 films released in 2014) but is characterised by a heterogeneous structure in terms of both funding and type of production. European films are characterised by their quality, originality and diversity, but suffer from limited promotion and distribution across the Union.

    In this context, the parliamentary committee made the following recommendations:

    Promotion, cross-border distribution and accessibility: Members encouraged the European film industry to pursue the development of innovative services, new business models and distribution channels to improve the cross-border availability of European films in the Union and, beyond that, to allow viewers across the Union to have access to an ever greater range of films across a growing number of platforms.

    The report stressed the need for:

    ·        greater legal offers of high quality, and for awareness-raising among young people to counter the impact of unauthorised use of creative works;

    ·        targeted marketing across the Union that takes into account the cultural specificities of European audiences;

    ·        greater availability of subtitled films in order to boost the cross-border circulation of European films;

    ·        promote and support European co-productions;

    ·        encourage the production, distribution and promotion on the European and global markets of high-quality European TV series which have had growing success;

    ·        strengthening measures for better optimisation of the price of cinema tickets, development of innovative promotions and subscription offers that would help ensure the attractiveness of, and access of all to, cinemas.

    The report notes the role played by MEDIA in supporting subtitling and dubbing and supports initiatives such as the Commission’s pilot project ‘Fostering European integration through culture’, aimed at reinforcing the provision of subtitled European films by providing new subtitled versions of selected TV programmes across all Europe.

    Audience development: Members encourage distributors and cinema exhibitors to increase the visibility and availability of non-national European films in order to reach wider audiences. They call on the Commission and the Member States to provide support to equip all screens with digital projection and sound technology in order to prevent the disappearance of small and independent cinemas.

    Level playing field: Members recall that the Audiovisual Media Services Directive obliges Member States to ensure that on-demand service providers promote European works. However, the Directive has been implemented in an uneven manner with different levels of legal requirements, and that this could result in providers establishing themselves in Member States with the lowest requirements.

    The Commission is called on to take the above into account when proposing a review of the current legal framework, in order to ensure a level playing field on the European audiovisual market with fair and equal conditions for all providers

    Funding: Members considers it necessary to increase funding in real terms for film distribution, promotion and marketing without this being at the expense of funding for production

    Member States are invited to:

    ·        to increase public funding in order to support at an early stage the distribution and promotion of national films abroad, as well as of non-national European films;

    ·        to promote incentives to facilitate the production, distribution, availability and attractiveness of European films; applying the same reduced VAT rates to cultural audiovisual works whether sold online or offline stimulates the growth of new services and platforms;

    ·        highlight the role to be played by Creative Europe’s Guarantee Facility, in terms of facilitating access to finance for SMEs in the cultural and creative sectors.

    The report:

    ·        calls on the Member States to reinforce their efforts to improve media literacy, and in particular film literacy, in school curricula and institutions of cultural education;

    ·        supports innovative projects and practices such as the Commission's preparatory action on the circulation of European films in the digital era.

    ·        calls on Member States to ensure the digitisation of cinematographic works.

    Lastly, it welcomes the Commission’s initiative to establish a European Film Forum, in order to facilitate a structured dialogue with all stakeholders in the audiovisual sector on the challenges currently faced by the sector in the digital era.
2015-04-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/5
date
2015-04-28T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
2015-04-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0123&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0123/2015
2015-04-02Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3
date
2015-04-01T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
2015-03-25Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea group: GUE/NGL name: MICHELS Martina group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2014-09-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
activities/2/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
2015-03-12Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner
Old
NAVRACSICS Tibor
New
OETTINGER Günther
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title
Old
Education and Culture
New
Communications Networks, Content and Technology
activities/0/commission/0/DG/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
other/0/commissioner
Old
NAVRACSICS Tibor
New
OETTINGER Günther
other/0/dg/title
Old
Education and Culture
New
Communications Networks, Content and Technology
other/0/dg/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm
2014-12-23Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/text

  • PURPOSE: presentation of a Communication entitled "European film in the digital era Bridging cultural diversity and competitiveness".

    BACKGROUND: worldwide praise is given to the European film heritage. However, most European films do not reach all their potential audience in Europe and even less so in the global market. For the most part, films stay on national markets but, even there, some fail to secure any other local distribution channels.

    In this context, the digital revolution offers more possibilities and flexibility for distribution and is having a fundamental impact on audience behaviour. It is essential therefore to adapt to the digital era and use its potential to keep existing audiences and reach new ones, and to build bridges between cultural diversity and competitiveness.

    The Communication provides a stocktaking of recent developments in the film sector and identifies current challenges in public policies impacting the film sector.

    It also highlights existing EU instruments that could contribute to the process of adaptation to these challenges.

    CONTENT: the Communication aims at improving the complementarity between the Member States and the Union policies in the area of cinema heritage and its promotion. In particular, it promotes common directions to better embrace the opportunities and address the challenges related to the digital shift while taking account of cultural and linguistic diversity and the varieties of the national audiovisual landscapes.

    It stresses the need for a joint effort to strengthen the global efficiency of existing funding tools for the competitiveness and diversity of the European film sector.

    The main trends: in the EU, European films represent on average 62.52% of releases and account for 32.9% of admissions. Box office receipts and admissions of European films fall far behind those of US productions. The Communication underlines that only a small minority of European films are released in cinemas outside of Europe (8% in 2010).

    At the same time, television is still the most widely used platform for watching films. In 2011, 41 % of the almost 122 000 feature films shown on TV in Europe were of European origin.

    While DVD is declining, Video on Demand (VoD) is a relatively new form of distribution expected to grow significantly in the coming years. In 2012, the VoD market recorded a growth rate of 59% in

    Germany and 14.7% in France.

    The Communication indicates that while cinema attendance has remained stable in recent years, that the Europeans go to the cinema less than once a month (39% never go to the cinema). Apart from in cinemas, Europeans watch films on free TV (79% of the population), on DVD (67 %). Mobile viewing therefore represents an important market especially as viewers increasingly expect to watch content anytime, anywhere and on every device. Average video online viewing per viewer, while still relatively low in the main EU markets, increased between 155% and 200% over the period 2008 to 2011

    ·        structural weaknesses of the European film sector: the Communication highlights the structural weaknesses of the sector which prevent it reaching larger audiences:

    ·        fragmentation of production and financing: the European film sector is composed mostly of small and micro enterprises relying on limited intangible assets. A large majority of European films are not profitable and do not recoup their investments. It is therefore difficult for European companies to become more stable. In addition, the complex film production financing system is being challenged by changes in distribution and consumption, triggered by digital technologies;

    ·        limited incentives to internationalise projects : more generally, the film sector does not mobilise appropriate finance for projects with an international focus. Projects therefore tend to target domestic audiences. The potential of co-production to increase the outreach of a given film could be better exploited; too many co-productions still lack a clear strategy for distribution in the countries concerned and beyond;

    ·        more funds for distribution and promotion: the focus of film policies on support to production overshadows the potential of distribution across all possible platforms. The rigid system of release windows (passage to other media of viewing cinema films) prevents the development and use of new, innovative release strategies and business models:

    ·        too slow to digitise: Europe is lagging behind in terms of digitisation: only 1.5% of film heritage has been digitised. This is explained by a lack of funding and high costs — both in money and time — for clearing rights;

    ·        shortcomings in entrepreneurial skills: initial training for cinema professionals often fails to deliver the necessary entrepreneurial and business skills. Relations between film schools and business are weak and training is still not offering sufficient opportunities to gain an international perspective and contacts.

    Commissionproposals: a concerted effort at all levels would be needed in order to overcome these structural weaknesses. A series of measures are proposed which can be summarised as follows:

    1) Reviewing the financing environment: a successful European film industry needs a rebalancing of spending between production, distribution and promotion of films, including progress via: i) strengthening public funding schemes by optimising its overall added value of funds granted, for example, ensuring that the project is developed in such a way as to reach its targeted audience or ensuring that publicly funded projects are accompanied by a well-designed distribution and marketing strategy. In this regard, the new MEDIA programme may make a useful contribution; ii) to better involve new actors in the value chain such as, for example, Netflix which may invest primarily in series but also increasingly in other genres like documentaries and comic monologues (stand-up comedies); iii) to allow access to private financing through EU financial instruments, such as, for example, guarantee funds opening up access to private funding, as provided by the programme COSME;

    2) Designing an innovative business environment: rapid developments in the sector call for sufficient flexibility to allow operators to experiment and to test new approaches and business models. Flexibility is particularly needed on release windows (for example, after cinema release, for VoDs and on-line broadcast) to enable the testing, developing and use of alternative release strategies adapted to different types of films and maximising complementarities of different platforms to reach out to audiences. This could secure additional audience share for those European films and maximise the effect of marketing efforts. Simultaneous or more coordinated release in cinemas across borders or more rapid access for online services could also be explored;

    3) Strengthening the creative environment: cooperation among European film schools (on curricula or mobility) and creative partnerships between schools and businesses are to be encouraged. The objective should be to promote a better match of training and skills with the needs of industry (including entrepreneurial, ICT, advertising and marketing skills). It should also aim to bring a more international and global audience perspective to the creative part of the industry. Creative cooperation should also be encouraged between the film sector and other sectors.(TV fiction, video games and cross media).

    Finally, measures are planned to enlarge the target audience. Information on audience preferences and consumer behaviour could help to better identify and target factors that can contribute to the success of a film.

    There is also a need to promote the visibility and discoverability of European films, and to engage with audiences. Film education also constitutes a major investment for tomorrow’s audiences. Here, the "Creative Europe" programme may contribute to improve approaches in this field.

    Next steps: in the face of rapid evolution in the sector, there is a need to promote a European debate and open a dialogue with all stakeholders — public authorities and private sector — about film policy in Europe. The debate should focus on the shared objectives of making the rich diversity of European films more accessible.

    To this end, the Commission intends to launch a European Film Forum, a process building on existing instruments, aiming at promoting the exchange of experience and practices, and the studying and sharing of knowledge on issues of common interest. The main focus of the Forum should be to debate public policies for the film sector and to involve — on a voluntary basis — interested parties.
2014-12-17Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1/committees/2/date
2014-11-05T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
committees/2/date
2014-11-05T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
2014-12-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
NAVRACSICS Tibor
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
NAVRACSICS Tibor
2014-11-28Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1
date
2014-11-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CULT/8/01727
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
2014-11-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/shadows/4
group
Verts/ALE
name
TRÜPEL Helga
2014-11-26Show (5) Changes
activities
  • date: 2014-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0272 celexid: CELEX:52014DC0272:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2014)0272 body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2015-03-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2015-04-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea group: GUE/NGL name: MICHELS Martina group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2014-09-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: EPP name: WENTA Bogdan Brunon
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2014-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CHARANZOVÁ Dita
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2014/2148(INI)
    title
    European film in the digital era
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject
    @parltrack
    @parltrack@eupolicy.social
    [javascript protected email address]
    code AGPLv3.0+
    data ODBLv1.0
    site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

    ParlTrack - 2011-2024

    © European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
    Hosted by AS250.net Foundation