Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | CORAZZA BILDT Anna Maria ( PPE) | SCHALDEMOSE Christel ( S&D), DALTON Daniel ( ECR), CHARANZOVÁ Dita ( ALDE), REDA Felix ( Verts/ALE), ZULLO Marco ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław ( ECR) | Kaja KALLAS ( ALDE), Barbara KAPPEL ( ENF), Jeppe KOFOD ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to remove obstacles to the free movement of non-personal data in the EU.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union.
CONTENT: this Regulation aims to ensure the free flow of data other than personal data within the Union by laying down rules relating to data localisation requirements, the availability of data to competent authorities and the porting of data for professional users.
The new Regulation is designed to boost the data economy and the development of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, products and services related to the Internet of Things and autonomous systems and 5G that raise new legal issues regarding access to data and their reuse, liability, ethics and solidarity.
Principle of free movement of data within the Union
The Regulation prohibits restrictions related to the location of data imposed by Member States on the geographical location of the storage or processing of non-personal data, unless justified on grounds of public security.
Member States shall immediately communicate to the Commission any draft act introducing a new data localisation requirement or amending an existing data localisation requirement. By 30 May 2021 at the latest, any existing data localisation requirements shall be repealed.
Data availability for competent authorities
Competent authorities shall retain the power to request access to data for the performance of their official duties, in accordance with Union or national law. Access to data by the competent authorities may not be refused on the grounds that the data are processed in another Member State.
Where, after requesting access to a user's data, a competent authority does not obtain access and if no specific cooperation mechanism exists under Union law or international agreements to exchange data between competent authorities of different Member States, that competent authority may request assistance from a competent authority in another Member State.
Member States may impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions in the event of failure to provide data.
Codes of conduct
The Regulation encourages the development of codes of conduct to facilitate the procedure for users to switch providers and port data back to its own IT systems.
Codes of conduct shall be comprehensive and shall cover at least those aspects that are essential during the data porting process, such as (i) the processes used and location of data backups, (ii) the available data formats and supports, (iii) the required IT configuration and minimum network bandwidth, (iv) the time required prior to initiating the porting process and the length of time during which the data will remain available for porting, and (vi) data access guarantees in the event of the service provider going bankrupt.
The Commission shall encourage service providers to complete the development of codes of conduct by 29 November 2019 and to effectively implement them by 29 May 2020. It shall have to ensure that codes of conduct are developed in close cooperation with all stakeholders, including SME and start-ups and cloud service providers.
Mixed data
In the case of a mixed data set, i.e. a data set composed of both personal and non-personal data, the Regulation shall apply to the non-personal data part of the data set.
Where personal and non-personal data in a data set are inextricably linked, this Regulation shall not prejudice the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Each Member State shall have to designate a single contact point to liaise with the single contact points of the other Member States and the Commission regarding the application of the Regulation.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 18.12.2018.
APPLICATION: from 18.6.2019.
The European Parliament adopted by 520 votes to 81 with 6 abstentions a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose : the proposed Regulation aims to ensure the free flow of data other than personal data within the Union by laying down rules relating to data localisation requirements, the availability of data to competent authorities and the porting of data for professional users.
The expanding Internet of Things, artificial intelligence and machine learning, represent major sources of non-personal data. Specific examples of non-personal data include aggregate and anonymised datasets used for big data analytics, data on precision farming that can help to monitor and optimise the use of pesticides and water, or data on maintenance needs for industrial machines.
Principle of free movement of non-personal data : under the amended text, data localisation requirements shall be prohibited, unless they are justified on grounds of public security in compliance with the principle of proportionality.
The concept of ‘public security’, within the meaning of Article 52 TFEU and as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers both the internal and external security of a Member State, as well as issues of public safety.
No later than 24 months from the date of application of this Regulation, if a Member State considers that an existing measure containing a data localisation requirement can remain in force, it shall communicate that measure to the Commission, together with a justification for maintaining it in force.
Member States shall make the details of any data localisation requirements via a national online single information point which they shall keep up-to-date, or provide up-to-date details of any such localisation requirements to a central information point established under another Union act. The Commission shall publish the link(s) to such point(s) on its website, along with a regularly updated consolidated list of all data localisation requirements.
Data availability for competent authorities : access to data by competent authorities may not be refused on the basis that the data are processed in another Member State.
Where, after requesting access to a user's data, a competent authority does not obtain access and if no specific cooperation mechanism exists under Union law or international agreements to exchange data between competent authorities of different Member States, that competent authority may request assistance from a competent authority in another Member State.
Member States may impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties for failure to provide data, in accordance with Union and national law.
Codes of conduct : the Commission shall encourage and facilitate the development of self-regulatory codes of conduct at Union level in order to contribute to a competitive data economy, based on the principles of transparency and interoperability and taking due account of open standards, covering inter alia the following aspects:
best practices for facilitating the switching of service providers and the porting of data in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format; minimum information requirements to ensure that professional users are provided, before a contract for data processing is concluded, with sufficiently detailed, clear and transparent information; approaches to certification schemes that facilitate the comparison of data processing products and services for professional users.
The Commission shall encourage suppliers to complete the development of codes of conduct no later than one year after the date of publication of the Regulation and to effectively implement them no later than 18 months after the date of publication of the Regulation . It should ensure that codes of conduct are developed in close cooperation with all stakeholders, including SME and start-ups associations, users and cloud service providers.
Mixed data : in the case of a mixed data set, i.e. a data set composed of both personal and non-personal data , the Regulation shall apply to the non-personal data part of the data set. Where personal and non-personal data in a data set are inextricably linked, this Regulation shall not prejudice the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 .
Review : no later than 4 years after the date of publication of the Regulation, the Commission shall submit a report evaluating the implementation of the Regulation, in particular as regards: (i) the application of the Regulation to data sets composed of both personal and non-personal data; (ii) the implementation by Member States of the public security exception; (iii) the development and effective implementation of codes of conduct.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the report by Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT (EPP, SE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union.
As a reminder, the proposed Regulation seeks to ensure the free movement of data other than personal data within the Union by laying down rules relating to data localisation requirements, the availability of data to competent authorities and data porting for professional users.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Principle of free movement of non-personal data : Members specified that data location requirements shall be prohibited unless, on an exceptional basis, and in compliance with the principle of proportionality, they are justified on imperative grounds of public security .
The concept of ‘imperative grounds of public security’ presupposes a threat to public security that is of a particularly high degree of seriousness. The amendment builds on the Treaty and the relevant case law of the Court of Justice to clarify the concept of public security and increase legal certainty.
Members wanted to introduce a clear deadline (no later than one year after the entry into force of the regulation) by which Member States must communicate the location requirements of the data they wish to maintain. The Commission shall examine the draft act within three months and decide whether or not the Member State concerned should amend or repeal the data location requirements. Any remaining data localisation requirements should be published on the Commission’s website to ensure easy accessibility of this information.
Scope : Members specified that public sector authorities and entities shall also benefit from the free movement of data. The Regulation shall apply to all levels of governance, including public procurement.
Mixed data sets : in the case of a mixed data set, namely a data set composed of both personal and non-personal data, the Regulation shall apply to the non-personal data of the data set. Where non-personal and personal data are inextricably linked, this Regulation should apply without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 .
Access to data for public authorities : the Commission's proposal provides that where a competent authority has exhausted all possible means of accessing data, it could request the assistance of an authority in another Member State if no specific cooperation mechanism exists. Members believe that such assistance could be requested where a competent authority does not obtain access to the data after contacting the user of the data processing service and where there is no specific cooperation mechanism under EU law or international agreements for the exchange of data between competent authorities of different Member States.
Members also pointed out that access to the premises where data is stored must be given in accordance with the national law of the Member State where the premises or equipment is located.
Codes of conduct : self-regulatory codes of conduct at EU level shall contribute to a competitive data economy, which are based on the principle of transparency and which establish guidelines on, inter alia , the following issues:
best practices for facilitating the switching of providers and porting data in a structured, commonly used, interoperable and machine-readable format; minimum information requirements to ensure that professional users are provided with sufficiently detailed, clear and transparent information before a contract for data storage and processing is concluded.
The Commission shall encourage providers to effectively implement the codes of conduct by 24 months after the date of publication of this Regulation. It shall ensure that the codes of conduct are developed in close cooperation with all relevant stakeholders , including associations of small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups, users and providers of cloud services.
Single point of contact : Members considered that the know-how of the single points of contact can be used not only as a link between the Member States and the Commission, but also to connect the institutions with users.
Review : no later than 3 years and 6 months after the date of publication of the Regulation, the Commission shall submit a report evaluating the implementation of the Regulation, in particular as regards: (i) the application of the Regulation to mixed data sets; (ii) the implementation by Member States of the public security exception; (iii) the development and effective implementation of codes of conduct.
PURPOSE: to create a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union and the foundation for developing the data economy and enhancing the competitiveness of European industry.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: currently, data localisation restrictions by Member States' public authorities and obstacles to the movement of data across IT systems prevent business and organisations in the EU from capturing economic, social and business opportunities. Legal uncertainty and lack of trust cause additional barriers to the free flow of non-personal data.
In practice, this means a business may not be or feel free to make full use of cloud services, choose the most cost-effective locations for IT resources, switch between service providers or port its data back to their own IT systems.
With the principle of free flow of non-personal data, businesses can avoid duplication of data at several locations, may feel more confident to enter new markets, and scale up their activities more easily.
The Mid-Term Review on the implementation of the Digital Single Market Strategy (DSM Strategy) announced a legislative proposal on an EU free flow of data cooperation framework.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the preferred option chosen allows for the assessment of a combination of legislation establishing the free flow of data framework and the single points of contact and an expert group as well as self-regulatory measures addressing data porting. This option would ensure the effective removal of existing unjustified localisation restrictions and would effectively prevent the future ones, as a result of a clear legal principle combined with the review, notification and transparency, while at the same time enhancing legal certainty and trust in the market. The burden on Member States' public authorities would be modest, leading to approximately EUR 33 000 annually in terms of human resources cost to sustain the single points of contact as well as a yearly cost of between EUR 385 and EUR 1925 for the preparation of notifications
CONTENT: the proposed Regulation seeks to ensure the free movement of data other than personal data within the Union by laying down rules relating to data localisation requirements, the availability of data to competent authorities and data porting for professional users.
It shall apply to the storage or other processing of electronic data other than personal data in the Union, which is (a) provided as a service to users residing or having an establishment in the Union, regardless of whether the provider is established or not in the Union or (b) carried out by a natural or legal person residing or having an establishment in the Union for its own needs.
The proposal:
establishes the principle of free movement of non-personal data in the Union. This principle prohibits any data localisation requirement , unless it is justified on grounds of public security. Furthermore, it provides for the review of existing requirements, notification of remaining or new requirements to the Commission and transparency measures; ensures data availability for regulatory control by competent authorities. To this effect, users may not refuse to provide access to data to competent authorities on the basis that data is stored or otherwise processed in another Member State. Where a competent authority has exhausted all applicable means to obtain access to the data, that competent authority may request the assistance of an authority in another Member State, if no specific cooperation mechanism exists; states that the Commission shall encourage service providers and professional users to develop and implement codes of conduct detailing the information on data porting conditions (including technical and operational requirements) that providers should make available to their professional users in a sufficiently detailed, clear and transparent manner before a contract is concluded. The Commission will review the development and effective implementation of such codes within two years after the start of application of this Regulation; stipulates that each Member State shall designate a single point of contact who shall liaise with the points of contact of other Member States and the Commission regarding the application of this Regulation; provides for procedural conditions applicable to the assistance between competent authorities; states that the Commission shall be assisted by the Free Flow of Data Committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011; calls for a review within five years after the start of application of the Regulation and that the Regulation will start to apply six months after the day of its publication.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: a moderate administrative burden for Member States' public authorities will emerge, caused by the allocation of human resources for the cooperation between Member States through the 'single points of contact', and for complying with the notification, review and transparency provisions.
Documents
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE639.846
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2018/1807
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 303 28.11.2018, p. 0059
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)755
- Draft final act: 00053/2018/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0381/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE639.846
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0201/2018
- Contribution: COM(2017)0495
- Committee opinion: PE613.537
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE619.414
- Committee draft report: PE619.038
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4820/2017
- Contribution: COM(2017)0495
- Contribution: COM(2017)0495
- Debate in Council: 3581
- Contribution: COM(2017)0495
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0304
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2017)0305
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0495
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0304
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0305
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4820/2017
- Committee draft report: PE619.038
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE619.414
- Committee opinion: PE613.537
- Draft final act: 00053/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)755
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE639.846
- Contribution: COM(2017)0495
- Contribution: COM(2017)0495
- Contribution: COM(2017)0495
- Contribution: COM(2017)0495
Activities
- Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel DALTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Inácio FARIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- József NAGY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Momchil NEKOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mirosław PIOTROWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Virginie ROZIÈRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jasenko SELIMOVIC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0201/2018 - Anna Maria Corazza Bildt - Am 47 04/10/2018 12:08:45.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
245 |
2017/0228(COD)
2018/02/27
ITRE
55 amendments...
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) At the same time, data mobility in the Union is also inhibited by private restrictions: legal, contractual and technical
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) In order to create a framework for the free movement of non-personal data in the Union and the foundation for developing the data economy and enhancing the competitiveness of European industry, it is necessary to lay down a clear, comprehensive and predictable legal framework for storage or other processing of data other than personal data in the internal market. A principle-based approach providing for cooperation among Member States as well as self-regulation should ensure that the framework is flexible, also with regard to the organisation of data management and analysis at national and intra-community level, so that it can take into account the evolving needs of users, providers and national authorities in the Union. In order to avoid the risk of overlaps with existing mechanisms and hence to avoid higher burdens both for Member States and businesses, detailed technical rules should not be established.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) In order to create a framework for the free movement of non-personal data in the Union and the foundation for developing the data economy and enhancing the competitiveness of European industry, it is necessary to lay down a clear, comprehensive and predictable legal framework for storage or other processing of data other than personal data in the internal market, taking into account existing cooperation mechanisms between Member States. A principle-based approach providing for cooperation among Member States as well as self-regulation should ensure that the framework is flexible so that it can take into account the evolving needs of users, providers and national authorities in the Union. In order to avoid the risk of overlaps with existing mechanisms and hence to avoid higher burdens both for Member States and businesses, detailed technical rules should not be established.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) Like businesses and consumers, the public authorities and bodies of Member States stand to benefit from increased freedom of choice regarding data-driven service providers, from more competitive prices and more efficient provision of services to citizens. Given the large amounts of data that public authorities and bodies handle, it is of the utmost importance that they lead by example in take-up of data-processing services and refrain from making any unjustified data localisation restrictions when they make use of private-sector data-processing services. Therefore public authorities and bodies should also be covered by this Regulation.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU)
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition would be justified for security reasons. In order to avoid undermining the legal framework for personal data in the Union, in the case of mixed data sets, Regulation (EU)2016/679 should apply to the personal data part.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition would be justified for security reasons. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and this Regulation provide a coherent set of rules that cater for free movement of different types of data. In the case of mixed data sets, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should apply to the personal data part of the set, and this Regulation should apply to the non-personal data part of the set. Where non-personal and personal data are inextricably linked, this Regulation should not prejudice the application of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Furthermore, this Regulation should not impose an obligation to store the different types of data separately.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition would be justified for security reasons. The Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and this Regulation provide a coherent set of rules that cater for free movement of different types of data. However, in practice, most data sets held by companies are ‘mixed’, containing both personal and non- personal data which cannot be easily separated. Therefore the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should be applied to the entire mixed data set, in order to avoid a breach of fundamental rights, namely for workers. Free flow of data should not constitute an obstacle for the development of start-ups and SMEs, but should allow to guarantee a high level of protection for personal data.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) Business and data users will be frequently confronted with mixed data sets and might have difficulties in unbundling personal data from the set. The Commission should provide clear guidance on the legal treatment of mixed data sets and should provide information in a simple manner to business in a website, with tools and guidance on possibilities to unbundled mixed data sets.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In order to ensure the effective application of the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, and to prevent the emergence of new barriers to the smooth functioning of the internal market, Member States
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In order to ensure the effective application of the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, and to prevent the emergence of new barriers to the smooth functioning of the internal market, Member States should without delay notify to the Commission any draft act that contains a new data localisation requirement or modifies an existing data localisation requirement. Those notifications should be submitted and assessed in accordance with the procedure laid down in Directive (EU) 2015/153533 . _________________ 33 Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services (OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1).
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) (19 a) In order to properly enforce this Regulation and to incentivise its compliance, Members States should empower their competent authorities to request users to cease breaches of this regulation. The competent authorities should be able to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties on users not complying with the freedom of free flow and if data localisation requirements persist.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In order to take full advantage of the competitive environment,
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In order to take full advantage of the competitive environment, professional users should be able to make informed choices and easily compare the individual components of various data storage or other processing services offered in the internal market, including as to the contractual conditions of porting data upon the termination of a contract. In order to align with the innovation potential of the market and to take into account the experience and expertise of the providers and professional users of data storage or other processing services, the detailed information and operational requirements for data porting should be defined by market players through self-regulation, encouraged and facilitated by the Commission, in the form of Union codes of conduct which may entail model contract terms. Nonetheless, if such codes of conduct are not put in place and effectively implemented within a reasonable period of time, the Commission should review the situation and asses the need to present legislative proposals to effectively reduce the number of barriers to the porting of data.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21 a) Where storage or other processing of data is carried out, users should also be allowed to receive data in a structured, commonly used, machine-readable and interoperable format, and to transmit it or have it transmitted directly from one data storage to another or to a processing service. Service providers should be encouraged to develop interoperable formats, making use of open standards and open specifications that enable data portability.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) In order to contribute to a smooth cooperation across Member States, each Member State should designate a single point of contact to liaise with the contact points of the other Member States and the Commission regarding the application of this Regulation. Where a competent authority in one Member State requests assistance of another Member State to have access to data pursuant to this Regulation, it should submit a duly motivated request to the latter's designated single point of contact, including a written explanation of
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) In order to ensure the effective implementation of the procedure for assistance between Member State competent authorities, the Commission may adopt implementing acts setting out standard forms, formats and channels of transmission, languages of requests, time limits or other details of the procedures for requests for assistance. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Enhancing trust in the security of cross-border data storage or other processing should reduce the propensity of market players and the public sector to use data localisation as a proxy for data security. It should also improve the legal certainty for companies on applicable security requirements when outsourcing their data storage or other processing activities, including to service providers in other Member States. For that purpose Member States should avoid intrusive legislation that would put into question the security, integrity or authenticity of the data, and the service providers should deploy state of the art available technologies to implement security-by- design and privacy-by-design policies and practices. Ease of switching providers and data portability are also trust increasing factors and should be ensured.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Enhancing trust in the security of cross-border data storage or other processing should reduce the propensity of market players and the public sector to use data localisation as a proxy for data security. It should also improve the legal certainty for companies on applicable security requirements when outsourcing their data storage or other processing activities, including to service providers in other Member States, and take into account the rapid ongoing development of new technologies, so as to adjust to them promptly.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) The Commission should periodically review this Regulation, in particular with a view to determining the need for
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) This Regulation should be without prejudice to other applicable Regulations on treatment of data, respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, including the rights to the protection of personal data (Article 8), the freedom to conduct a business (Article 16), and the freedom of expression and information (Article 11).
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation seeks to ensure the free movement of
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation seeks to ensure the free movement of data other than personal data within the Union by laying down rules relating to data localisation requirements, the availability of data to competent authorities and data porting for
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. This Regulation shall apply to the storage or other processing of electronic
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) provided as a service to both private and public users residing or having an establishment in the Union, regardless of whether the provider is established or not in the Union or
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) carried out by a natural or legal person residing or having an establishment in the Union for its own needs, regardless of whether it is a private person, a public- private entity or a public authority governed by public law.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. In the case of mixed data sets, this Regulation shall apply to the non- personal data part of the set. Where personal and non-personal data are inextricably linked, this Regulation shall apply to the whole set without prejudice to Regulation (EU)2016/679.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. This Regulation shall not apply to mixed data sets that include personal data which cannot be unbundled.In respect to the mixed data sets, Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 shall apply. The Commission shall publish on its website a detailed guidance for businesses, in particular for SMEs, regarding the relevant provisions applicable to mixed data sets as well as a guidance regarding the treatment of such data sets, and in particular as regards the possible unbundling of personal data from them in order to render the data subject to this Regulation.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 a (new) Article 2 a Where non-personal and personal data are inextricably linked, this Regulation should be without prejudice to the application of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 .
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 1. 'data' means
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 3. 'draft act' means a text formulated with the aim of having it enacted as a law, regulation or administrative provision of a general nature including public procurement tenders, the text being at the stage of preparation at which substantive amendments can still be made by the notifying Member State;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 5. 'data localisation requirement' means any obligation, prohibition, condition, limit or other requirement provided for in the laws, regulations or administrative provisions or practices, including in the field of public procurement, of the Member States, which imposes the location of data storage or other processing in the territory of a specific Member State or hinders storage or other processing of data in any other Member State;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 7. 'user' means a natural or legal person, including a public sector entity, using or requesting a data storage or other processing service;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Location of data for storage or other processing within the Union shall not be restricted to the territory of a specific Member State, and storage or other processing in any other Member State shall not be prohibited or restricted, unless it is justified
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall without delay notify to the Commission any draft act which introduces a new data localisation requirement or makes changes to an existing data localisation requirement in accordance with the procedures set out in the national law implementing Directive (EU) 2015/1535.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall inform the Commission of the address of their single information point referred to in paragraph 4. The Commission shall publish the links to such points on its website. The information provided by the Commission shall be available in all of the official languages of the European Union.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. The Commission shall publish on its website a guidance regarding the obligations imposed by this Regulation on providers and users of data processing. This guidance shall be presented in a manner that is easy to understand, using clear and plain language.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 a (new) Article 5 a Compliance and Penalties The competent authorities of the Members States shall have the power to monitor and supervise compliance with the requirement of free movement of data. Competent authorities shall have the power to require undertakings to provide all information necessary to verify the compliance with this Regulation. They shall require that infringements of free movement of data are ended, and shall have the power, where relevant, to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for failure to comply with an obligation to provide data or for unjustified restrictions to free movement of data.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the development of self- regulatory codes of conduct at Union level,
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the development of self- regulatory codes of conduct at Union level, in order to define guidelines on best practices in facilitating the switching of providers, interoperability, and to ensure that they provide professional users with sufficiently detailed, clear and transparent information before a contract for data storage and processing is concluded, as regards the following issues:
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the processes, technical requirements, timeframes and charges that apply in case a
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) best practices facilitating the switching of providers or porting data to a user’s own IT systems, using structured, common and machine-readable formats, including a possibility to fall-back to open standard formats where required or requested by the recipient, and allowing sufficient time for users to switch or port the data; and
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The codes of conduct shall provide for removal of barriers that limit the data mobility, promote the use of open standards and open specifications and provide for trust increasing technologies.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall encourage providers to effectively implement the codes of conduct referred to in paragraph 1 within
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall encourage providers to effectively implement the codes of conduct referred to in paragraph 1 within
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall draw up a report reviewing the development and effective implementation of such codes of conduct and the effective provision of information by providers no later than two years after the start of application of this Regulation. Where the self-regulatory code of conduct has not reduced the number of existing barriers to the porting of data, the report shall, as appropriate, be accompanied by a legislative proposal .
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall review the development and effective implementation of such codes of conduct and the effective provision of information by providers no later than two years after the start of application of this Regulation. If such codes of conduct are not put in place and effectively implemented within the set period of time, or if there are causes for concern after proper review the Commission can intervene and set minimal guidance through implementing act.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall review the development and effective implementation of such codes of conduct and the effective provision of information by providers no later than two years after the start of application of this Regulation and, if desirable, prolong the period of self- regulation.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall review the development and effective implementation of such codes of conduct and the effective provision of information by providers no later than t
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall review the development and effective implementation of such codes of conduct and the effective provision of information by providers no later than
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission may adopt implementing acts setting out standard forms, formats and channels of transmission, languages of requests, time limits or other details of the procedures for requests for assistance. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 8.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. The single contact point shall also provide general information to professional users and the public concerning the obligations provided for in this Directive, as well as concerning any code of conduct developed in accordance with Article 6.
source: 618.302
2018/04/09
IMCO
190 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Moreover, in order to eliminate potential existing barriers, during a transitional period of 12 months, Member States should carry out a review of existing national laws, regulations or administrative provisions of a general nature laying down data localisation requirements and notify to the Commission, together with a justification, any data localisation requirement that they consider being in compliance with this Regulation. These notifications should enable the Commission to assess the compliance of
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Moreover, in order to eliminate potential existing barriers, during a transitional period of 12 months, Member States should carry out a review of existing national legislation, administrative procedures and rules establishing data localisation requirements and
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Moreover, in order to eliminate potential existing barriers, during a transitional period of 12 months, Member
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) In order to ensure the transparency of data localisation requirements in the Member States for natural and legal persons, such as providers and users of data
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) In order to ensure the transparency of data localisation requirements in the Member States for natural and legal persons, such as providers and users of data storage or other processing services, Member States should publish on a single online information point and regularly update the information on such measures. In order to appropriately inform legal and natural persons of data localisation requirements across the Union, Member States should notify to the Commission the addresses of such online points. The Commission should publish this information on its own
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Data localisation requirements are frequently underpinned by a lack of trust in cross-border data storage or other processing, deriving from the presumed unavailability of data for the purposes of the competent authorities of the Member States, such as for inspection and audit for regulatory or supervisory control.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Data localisation requirements are frequently underpinned by a lack of trust in cross-border data storage or other processing, deriving from the fear of different security levels in each Member State and the presumed unavailability of data for the purposes of the competent authorities of the Member States, such as for inspection and audit for regulatory or supervisory control. Therefore, th
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Data localisation requirements are frequently underpinned by a lack of trust in cross-border data
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Natural or legal persons who are subject to obligations to provide data to competent authorities can comply with such obligations by providing and guaranteeing effective and timely
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Where a natural or legal person subject to obligations to provide data fails to comply with them
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Where a request for assistance entails obtaining access to any premises of a natural or legal person including to any data
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) (19a) This regulation should not make it possible for users to evade national laws. The Member States should be free to impose proportionate, effective and deterrent penalties against users who prevent the national authorities from accessing data stored in another Member State. If a physical or moral person does not comply with the obligation to provide these data, the relevant national authorities can require that the data be returned to their national territory.
Amendment 112 #
(20) The ability to port data without hindrance is a key facilitator of user choice and effective competition on markets for data storage or other processing services. The real or perceived difficulties to port data cross-border also undermine the confidence of
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The ability to port data without hindrance is a key facilitator of user choice and effective competition on markets for data
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In order to take full advantage of the competitive environment, professional users should be able to make informed choices and easily compare the individual components of various data storage or other processing services offered in the internal market, including as to the contractual conditions of porting data upon the termination of a contract. In order to align with the innovation potential of the market and to take into account the experience and expertise of the providers and professional users of data storage or other processing services, the detailed information and operational requirements for data porting should be defined by market players
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In order to take full advantage of the competitive environment,
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In order to take full advantage of the competitive environment, professional users should be able to make informed choices and easily compare the individual components of various data storage or other processing services offered in the internal market, including as to the contractual conditions of porting data upon the termination of a contract. In order to align with the innovation potential of the market and to take into account the experience and expertise of the providers and professional users of data storage or other processing services, the detailed information and operational requirements for data porting should be defined by
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In order to take full advantage of the competitive environment, professional users should be able to make informed choices and easily compare the individual components of various data
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In order to take full advantage of the competitive environment, professional users should be able to make informed
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) Where data storage or other processing of data is carried out, users should be allowed to receive data in a structured, commonly used, machine- readable and interoperable format, and to transmit it or have it transmitted directly from one to another data storage or processing service. Service providers should provide the data in interoperable formats, making use of open standards and open specifications that enable data portability.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Enhancing trust in the security of cross-border data storage or other processing should reduce the propensity of market players and the public sector to use data localisation as a proxy for data security. It should also improve the legal certainty for companies on applicable security requirements when outsourcing their data storage or other processing activities, including to service providers in other Member States. For that purpose Member States need to avoid intrusive legislation that would put into question the security, integrity, or authenticity of the data, such as government back-doors, while the service providers should deploy state of the art available technologies to implement security-by-design and privacy- by-design policies and practices. Ease of switching providers and data portability are also trust-increasing factors and need to be ensured.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) Enhancing trust in the security of cross-border data
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Any security requirements related to data
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Security requirements set at national level should be necessary and proportionate to the risks posed to the security of data storage or other processing in the area in scope of the national law in which these requirements are set. In addition, intellectual property rights, trade secrets and the right of companies to protect their knowledge should be fully respected.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Security requirements set at national or federal level should be necessary and proportionate to the risks posed to the security of data storage or other processing in the area in scope of the national law in which these requirements are set.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Security requirements set at national level should be necessary and proportionate to the risks posed to the security of data
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Directive 2016/114841 provides for legal measures to boost the overall level of cybersecurity in the Union. Data
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) The Commission should periodically
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) The Commission should periodically review this Regulation, in particular with a view to determining the need for modifications in the light of technological or market developments, especially with regards to the development of artificial intelligence, machine learning, Internet of Things, big data analysis among others.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) The Commission should
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) The Commission should
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 a (new) (28 a) The legal framework of public procurement, especially with regard to environmental, social and labour aspects of public procurement, in particular Directive (EU) 2014/241a should not be affected by this Regulation. _________________ 1aDirective 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) This Regulation is without prejudice to other applicable EU law regarding treatment of data, respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, including the rights to the protection of personal data (Article 8), the freedom to conduct a business (Article 16), and the freedom of expression and information (Article 11).
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 a (new) (29a) This Regulation is without prejudice to Directive [XX] on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content.
Amendment 134 #
(29b) As public sector entities, such as Union and Member States’ authorities and administrations, are particularly affected by this Regulation, they should take a lead role in the application of the free flow of data in order to encourage the uptake of the free flow of data also among businesses.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation seeks to ensure the free movement of data other than personal data within the Union by laying down rules relating to data localisation requirements, the availability of data to competent authorities and data porting for professional users, hence ensuring the efficient and effective functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation seeks to ensure the free movement of data other than personal data within the Union by laying down rules relating to data localisation requirements, the availability of data to competent authorities and data porting for
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation seeks to ensure the free movement of data other than personal data within the Union by laying down rules relating to data localisation requirements, the availability of data to competent authorities and data porting for
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. This Regulation shall apply to the
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Where there are mixed data sets, this Regulation shall apply to the non- personal data part of the set. If it is not possible to draw a clear distinction between personal data and non-personal data within the data set, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation 2017/0003 (COD) shall apply.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In cases of mixed data sets, where personal and non-data are inextricably linked, this Regulation does not impose an obligation to unbundle the mixed data sets. In such cases, this Regulation shall apply to the mixed data set in its entirety, without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Regulation shall not apply to the storage or other processing of electronic data in the case of any intermixture of non-personal data and personal data, or in the case of any combination of non-personal data that can lead to personal data or to identify a person.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In the case of mixed data sets, this Regulation shall apply to the non- personal data part of the set. Where personal and non-personal data are inextricably linked, this Regulation shall apply without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Regulation shall not apply to all data that falls under Regulation (EU)2016/679; in the case of data sets which contain personal and non-personal data, these data sets shall be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In the case of mixed data sets, where personal and non-personal data are inextricably linked, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 applies to the whole data set.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. This Regulation shall not apply: a) to an activity which falls outside the scope of Union law or b) to an activity which is necessary to the fulfilment of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority and which fall within the scope of public archives activity pursuant to the Union or national law.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The application of this Regulation shall be without prejudice to the protection of business secrets and other sensitive data relating to the know-how of natural and legal persons.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. This regulation shall apply without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) 1a. ‘mixed data set’ means a data set composed of personal and non-personal data which are inextricably linked.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) 1a. ‘mixed data set’ means a set of data which consists of both personal and non-personal data;
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) 1a. ‘mixed data set’ means a data set composed of both personal and non- personal data.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) 1a. ‘mixed data sets’ refers to a data set that is composed of both personal and non-personal data.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) 2a. ‘processing’ means any operation or set of operations which is performed on data or on sets of data in electronic format, whether or not by automated means, such as collection, recording, organisation, structuring, storage, adaptation or alteration, retrieval, consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making available, alignment or combination, restriction, erasure or destruction.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 4. ‘provider’ means a natural or legal person who provides data
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 5. ‘data localisation requirement’ means any obligation, prohibition, condition, limit or other requirement
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6. ‘competent authority’ means an authority of a Member State that has the power to obtain access to data
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 7. ‘user' means a natural or legal person, including a public sector entity, using or requesting a data storage or other processing service
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 7. ‘user’ means a natural or legal person, including a public sector entity, using or requesting a data storage or other processing service;
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 7. ‘user’ means a natural or legal person, including a public authority or body, using or requesting a data
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Amendment 162 #
8. ‘professional user’ means a natural or legal person, including a public sector entity, using or requesting a data
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Location of data for storage or other processing within the Union shall not be restricted to the territory of a specific Member State, and storage or other processing in any other Member State shall
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Location of data for storage or other processing within the Union shall not be restricted to the territory of a specific Member State, and storage or other processing in any other Member State shall not be prohibited or restricted, unless it is justified on grounds of
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Location of data for storage or other processing within the Union shall not be restricted to the territory of a specific Member State, and storage or other processing in any other Member State shall not be prohibited or restricted, unless it is justified on grounds of ensuring the defence and security of a Member State or public security.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Public authorities and bodies governed by public law shall be explicitly encouraged to foster and take advantage of the free flow of data in the Union. In keeping with their sovereign task of providing basic services, in individual cases public authorities may decide that there are good reasons to continue storing and processing data exclusively locally.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall immediately notify to the Commission any draft act which introduces a new data localisation requirement or makes changes to an existing data localisation requirement in accordance with the procedures set out
Amendment 171 #
3.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall make the details of any data localisation requirements applicable in their territory publicly available online via a single information point which they shall keep up-to-date, or via a Union-level information point established under another Union act if and when available.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall inform the Commission of the address of their single information point referred to in paragraph 4. The Commission shall publish the links to such points on its website, along with a consolidated list of all data localisation requirements referred to in paragraph 4, which it shall regularly update.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall inform the Commission of the address of their single information point referred to in paragraph 4. The Commission shall publish the links to such points on its website. The information provided by the Commission shall be available in all of the official languages of the Union.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation shall not affect the powers of competent authorities to request and receive access to data for the performance of their official duties in accordance with Union or national law. Access to data by competent authorities may not be refused on the basis that the data is stored or otherwise processed in another Member State, except when it comes to ensuring the security and defence of a Member State or public security.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation shall not
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Where a competent authority
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Where a competent authority has exhausted all applicable means to obtain
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Where a competent authority
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Member States should be free to impose proportionate, effective and deterrent penalties against users who prevent the national authorities from accessing data stored in another Member State.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. If a physical or moral person does not comply with the obligation to provide these data, the relevant national authorities can require that the data be returned to their national territory.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Where a request for assistance entails obtaining access to any premises of a natural or legal person including to any data
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph -1 (new) -1. Users shall have the right to receive the data they submitted for storage or other processing in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format; and the right to transmit those data to another provider without hindrance from the provider.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the development of self- regulatory codes of conduct at Union level, in order to promote data interoperability through high-quality open standard formats and to define guidelines on best practices in facilitating the switching of providers and to ensure that they provide
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the development of self- regulatory codes of conduct at Union level,
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the development of self- regulatory codes of conduct at Union level, in order to
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the development of self- regulatory codes of conduct at Union level, in order to
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the development of self- regulatory codes of conduct at Union level,
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new) (-a) best practices facilitating the switching of providers or porting data to a user’s own IT systems, using structured, commonly used, machine-readable and interoperable formats, including open standard formats where required or requested by the service provider receiving the data; and allowing sufficient time for users to switch or port the data; and
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the processes, technical requirements, timeframes and charges that apply in case a
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) certification schemes for data processing products and services, facilitating the comparability of quality of these products and services. Such schemes may include inter alia quality management, information security management, business continuity management and, environmental management.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall ensure that the codes of conduct are developed in close cooperation with all relevant stakeholders, including associations of small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups, users and providers of cloud services.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The codes of conduct referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall provide for removal of barriers that limit the data mobility, promote the use of open standards and open specifications and provide for trust-increasing technologies.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall encourage providers to effectively implement the codes of conduct referred to in paragraph 1 within
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Data processing services which conform to the codes of conduct should be given priority, in public procurement processes, over equivalent or similar services or products that do not conform to the provisions of this Regulation, so as to facilitate switching of suppliers.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall review the development and effective implementation of
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission, through an impact assessment, shall review the development and effective implementation of such codes of conduct and the effective provision of information by providers no later than two years after the start of application of this Regulation. On the basis of that assessment, it shall consider the option of making those codes binding.
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall review the development and effective implementation of such codes of conduct and the effective provision of information by providers no later than
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall designate a single point of contact who shall liaise with the single points of contact of other Member States and the Commission regarding the application of this Regulation. Member States shall notify to the Commission the designated single points of contact and any subsequent change thereto at the earliest opportunity.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new) Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The single points of contact shall provide users with general information on the provisions of this Regulation, in particular on the drawing up of codes of conduct as defined in Article 6.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. No later than [
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. No later than
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. No later than [
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. No later than
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. No later than [
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a (new) (a) The application of this Regulation to mixed data sets especially taking into account the development of new technologies such as Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, big data analysis and the process of deanonymising data.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a (new) (a) the effects of this Regulation to public sector entities, and the acceptance and uptake in the private sector;
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (new) (b) the implementation by Member States of Article 4(1), in particular the public security exception;
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (new) (b) The use of the public security exception by Member States as defined in Article 4(1).
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c (new) (c) the effective implementation of the right to data portability referred to in Article 6(-1);
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d (new) (d) the development and effective implementation of the codes of conduct referred to in Article 6(1) and the effective provision of information by providers.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. By 6 months after the date of publication of this Regulation the Commission shall provide guidelines on the legal treatment of mixed data sets and the interaction between this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. By [6 months after the date of publication of this Regulation] the Commission shall publish guidelines on the complementarity of this Regulation and Regulation (EU)2016/679 with regards to mixed data sets.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The digitisation of the economy is accelerating. Information and Communications Technology (ICT) is no longer a specific sector but the foundation of all modern innovative economic systems and societies. Electronic data is at the centre of those systems and can generate great value when analysed or combined with services and products. At the same time, cybersecurity represents one of the major threats to our societies. Securing network and information systems in the European Union is essential for the further development of the online economy, as well as for ensuring that there is trust in the digital economy as a whole. Consequently, this Regulation and the ENISA Regulation [2017/0225(COD)] need to be fully consistent with one another.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The digitisation of the economy is accelerating. Information and Communications Technology (ICT) is no longer a specific sector but the foundation of all modern innovative economic systems
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Data value chains are built on different data activities: data creation and collection; data aggregation and organisation; data storage and processing; data analysis, marketing and distribution; use and re-use of data. The effective and efficient functioning of data storage and other processing is a fundamental building block in any data value chain.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Data value chains are built on different data activities: data creation and collection; data aggregation and
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union apply to data storage or other processing services. However, the provision of those services is hampered or sometimes prevented by certain national, regional and local requirements to locate data in a specific territory.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union apply to data storage or other processing services. However, the provision of those services is hampered or sometimes prevented by certain national or federal requirements to locate data in a specific territory.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union apply to data
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services authorised under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union apply to data storage or other
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Free Flow of Data within Europe will contribute to realizing data-driven growth and innovation. Like businesses and consumers, public administrations will benefit from an increased freedom of choice regarding data-driven service providers. It should be clear that public administrations themselves are not allowed either to make any unjustified data localization restrictions when they make use of the data-services of private parties. In order to stimulate Free Flow of Data public administrations of Member States should lead by example by using data-services all over Europe regarding non-personal data.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Free flow of data within the European Union will play a leading role in realising data-driven growth and innovation. Like businesses and consumers, public administrations will also benefit from an increased freedom of choice regarding data-driven service providers. In order to stimulate the free flow of data, and given the large amount of data they handle, public administrations should lead by example by refraining from making data localisation restrictions and using data services all over Europe.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Such obstacles to the free movement of data storage or other processing services and to the right of establishment of data storage or other processing providers originate from requirements in the national laws of Member States to locate data in a specific geographical area or territory for the purpose of storage or other processing. Other rules or administrative practices have an equivalent effect by imposing specific requirements which make it more difficult to store or otherwise process data outside a specific geographical area or territory
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Such obstacles to the free movement of data
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Such obstacles to the free movement of data storage or other processing services and to the right of establishment of data storage or other processing providers originate from requirements in the national or federal laws of Member States to locate data in a specific geographical area or territory for the purpose of storage or other processing. Other rules or administrative practices have an equivalent effect by imposing specific requirements which make it more difficult to store or otherwise process data outside a specific geographical area or territory within the Union, such as requirements to use technological facilities that are certified or approved within a specific Member State. Legal uncertainty as to the extent of legitimate and illegitimate data localisation requirements further limits the choices available to market players and to the public sector regarding the location of data storage or other processing.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Such
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) At the same time, data mobility in the Union
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) At the same time, data mobility in the Union is also inhibited by private restrictions: legal, contractual and technical issues hindering or preventing users of data
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) For reasons of legal certainty and the need for a level playing field within the Union, a single set of rules for all market participants is a key element for the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) For reasons of legal certainty and the need for a level playing field within the Union, a single set of rules for all market participants is a key element for the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) In order to create a framework for the free movement of non-personal data in the Union and the foundation for developing the data economy and enhancing the competitiveness of European industry in compliance with European data protection rules, it is necessary to lay down a clear, comprehensive and predictable legal framework for storage or other processing of data other than personal data in the internal market. A principle-based approach providing for cooperation among Member States as well as self-regulation should ensure that the framework is flexible so that it can take into account the evolving needs of users, providers and national authorities in the Union. In order to avoid the risk of overlaps with existing mechanisms and hence to avoid higher burdens both for Member States and businesses, detailed technical rules should not be established.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) In order to create a framework for the free movement of non-personal data in the Union and the foundation for developing the data economy and enhancing the competitiveness of European industry, it is necessary to lay down a clear, comprehensive and predictable legal framework for
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) This Regulation should explicitly encourage public authorities and bodies governed by public law to take account of the economic and other advantages of outsourcing and thereby promote the free flow of data in the Union. In keeping with the principle of local self-government and their sovereign task of providing basic services, however, and if they have appropriate grounds for so doing, public authorities should be free to decide to continue storing data, such as sensitive data concerning security of supply, locally and to process that data themselves.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should apply to legal or natural persons who provide data
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) The organisation and preservation of archives is carried out in the public interest and constitute a non-market service. It falls therefore within the scope of Protocol No 26 on services of general interest annexed to the Treaties. This regulation should therefore not apply to the storage or processing of non-personal data which are related to an activity which is necessary to the fulfilment of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority and which fall within the scope of public archives activity pursuant to the Union or national law.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) This Regulation lays down high- level rules relating to the development of self-regulatory model of the porting of data which are interoperability, open standards and mutual recognition of certification schemes based on European Standards improving their comparability, and is without prejudice to REGULATION (EC) No 765/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The legal framework on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/67930
Amendment 66 #
(9) The legal framework on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/67930
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The legal framework on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679,30 Directive (EU) 2016/68031 and Directive 2002/58/EC32
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) This Regulation should not apply to the storage or other processing of electronic data in the case of any intermixture of non-personal data and personal data, or in the case of any combination of non-personal data that could lead to personal data or to identify a person.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10)
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition would be justified for security reasons.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition would be justified for security reasons. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and this Regulation provide a coherent set of rules that cater for free movement of different types of data. In the case of mixed data sets, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should apply to the personal data part of the set, and this Regulation should apply to the non-personal data part of the set. Where non-personal and personal data are inextricably linked, this Regulation should not prejudice the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The protection of the privacy of natural and legal persons as well as the protection of the processing of personal data, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Directive (EU) 2016/680 and Directive 2002/58/EC shall not be affected by this. Furthermore, this Regulation does not impose an obligation to store the different types of data separately.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Article 16 of the Services Directive the prohibition of the free flow of services including data processing prevent data being localised for reasons other than public security. Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition would be justified for security reasons. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and this Regulation provide a coherent set of rules that cater for the free movement of different types of data. In the case of mixed data sets, this Regulation should apply to the non- personal data part of the set. Where non- personal and personal data in a mixed data set are inextricably linked, this Regulation should, without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679, apply to the whole set, in regard to localisation practices. Furthermore, this Regulation imposes neither an obligation to store the different types of data separately nor an obligation to unbundle mixed data sets.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition would be justified for security reasons. Regulation 2016/679 and this Regulation regulate respectively personal and non- personal data. In the case of closely linked mixed data, which cannot be separated either technically or economically, this Regulation should as a whole, without prejudice to Regulation 2016/679. In those cases where a set of mixed data includes personal data that may directly affect the protection of physical persons, and put at stake the fundamental rights and freedoms thereof, Regulation 2016/679 will apply.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Under Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Member States may neither restrict nor prohibit the free movement of personal data within the Union for reasons connected with the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. This Regulation establishes the same principle of free movement within the Union for non-personal data except when a restriction or a prohibition would be justified for public security reasons as defined by Union law, in particular Article 52 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Whereas data that is neither personal nor non-personal does not exist by definition, new technological advancements in big data analytics have opened up for the possibility to turn anonymised non-personal data into personal data by comparing and aggregating large quantities of non- personal data. In this case, the line between personal data and non-personal data is not fixed but rather depends upon technological developments and new uses of technologies. In these instances, where non-personal data has become personalised, the data should be treated as such and the provisions laid down in Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should apply accordingly.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) This Regulation should apply to non-personal data. Where a natural person is directly or indirectly identifiable following the Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR), a data set cannot be considered non-personal. Furthermore, mixed data sets should be considered mixed where personal and non-personal data are inextricably linked. Therefore such data sets should be considered as personal data and only the GDPR applies. This Regulation should neither impose an obligation to store personal and non- personal data separately nor an obligation to unbundle mixed data sets.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Where personal and non-personal data are inextricably linked, this Regulation should be applied to the whole data set. This Regulation should not create preconditions for mixed data sets to be broken down into their constituent parts or stored separately, nor make this an obligation.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) In cases where personal and non- personal data are inextricably linked, this Regulation does not impose an obligation to unbundle the mixed data sets. In such cases, this Regulation shall apply to the mixed data set in its entirety, without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 b (new) (10b) The growing availability of Internet of Things (IoT) and the development of machine learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI) goes hand in hand with the proliferation of devices that collect non-personal data. These new technologies are already used in farm productivity, translation, manufacturing robots and navigation systems among others. However, data collected within certain industries could contain both personal and non-personal data and should be treated under the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and this regulation respectively.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 c (new) (10c) The Commission should provide clear and easily accessible guidelines on the legal treatment of mixed data sets in order for especially SMEs to handle the interaction between this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) This Regulation should apply to data
Amendment 85 #
(11) This Regulation should apply to electronic data storage or other processing
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Data localisation requirements represent a clear barrier to the free provision of data storage or other processing services across the Union and to the internal market. As such, they should be banned unless they relate to the public archives or are justified based on the grounds of public security, public order or public health, as defined by Union law, in particular Article 52 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and satisfy the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In order to give effect to the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, to ensure the swift removal of existing data localisation requirements and to enable for operational reasons storage or other processing of data in multiple locations across the EU, and since this Regulation provides for measures to ensure data availability for regulatory control purposes, Member States sh
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Data localisation requirements represent a clear barrier to the free provision of data storage or other processing services across the Union and to the internal market. As such, they should be banned unless they are justified based on the grounds of public security, as defined by Union law, in particular Article 52 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and satisfy the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. Regardless of this data storage or other processing of authorities and political bodies of national or federal governments and parliaments should be always considered to be justified for grounds of public security. In order to give effect to the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, to ensure the swift removal of existing data localisation requirements and to enable for operational reasons storage or other processing of data in multiple locations across the EU, and since this Regulation provides for measures to ensure data availability for regulatory control purposes, Member States should not be able to invoke justifications other than public security.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Data localisation requirements represent a clear barrier to the free provision of data storage or other processing services across the Union and to the internal market. As such, they should be banned unless they are justified based on the grounds of
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Data localisation requirements represent a clear barrier to the free provision of data storage or other processing services across the Union and to the internal market. As such, they should be banned unless they are justified based on the grounds of a high threat to public security, as defined by Union law, in particular Article 52 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and satisfy the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In order to give effect to the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, to ensure the swift removal of existing data localisation requirements and to enable for operational reasons storage or other processing of data in multiple locations across the EU, and since this Regulation provides for measures to ensure data availability for regulatory control purposes, Member States should not be able to invoke justifications other than public security.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Data localisation requirements represent a clear barrier to the free provision of data storage or other processing services across the Union and to the internal market. As such, they should
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Data localisation requirements represent a clear barrier to the free provision of data
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The concept of ‘public security’, is understood within the meaning of Article 52 of the TFEU and as interpreted by the European Court of Justice. The concept of ‘public security’ covers both the internal and external security of a Member State. Public security presupposes the existence of a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society, such as a threat to the functioning of institutions and essential public services and the survival of the population, as well as by risk of a serious disturbance to foreign relations or the peaceful coexistence of nations, or a risk of military interest.
Amendment 94 #
(12a) The concept of “public security” within the meaning of Article 52 of the TFEU, encompasses the internal and external security of Member States. As established by the case law of the CJEU, the concept of imperative grounds of public security involves not only the existence of impairment of public safety, but also that such impairment presents a particularly high level of seriousness.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The only justification to for data localisation requirements is public security. In compliance with the principle of proportionality, data localisation requirements that are justified for public security reasons should be suitable for attaining the objective pursued, and should not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In order to ensure the effective application of the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, and to prevent the emergence of new barriers to the smooth functioning of the internal market, Member States should immediately notify to the Commission any draft act that contains a new data localisation requirement or modifies an existing data localisation requirement. Those notifications should be submitted and assessed in accordance with
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In order to ensure the effective application of the principle of free flow of non-personal data across borders, and to prevent the emergence of new barriers to the smooth functioning of the internal market, Member States should
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 source: 619.414
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/8/date |
Old
2018-07-12T00:00:00New
2018-07-11T00:00:00 |
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2017)614628New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2017)614628 |
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4820)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:4820)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE619.038New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-619038_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE619.414New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-619414_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE613.537&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-613537_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31247&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181003&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-10-03-TOC_EN.html |
events/11 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/8/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0201&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0201_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0381New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0381_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/6/docs |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/8/11036New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
KING JulianNew
GABRIEL Mariya |
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/committees |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2017-10-23T00:00:00New
2018-10-01T00:00:00 |
activities/6/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
links/Research document |
|
other/0/commissioner |
Old
KING JulianNew
GABRIEL Mariya |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
procedure/subject/3 |
Old
3.30.06 Information and communication technologiesNew
3.30.06 Information and communication technologies, digital technologies |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2017-11-09T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-11-09T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2017-10-25T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-10-25T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
IMCO/8/11036
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
committees/0/responsible |
Old
New
True |
committees/1/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|