BETA


2018/2115(INI) Taking stock of the follow-up taken by the EEAS two years after the EP Report on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties. Recommendation to the Vice President/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and to the Council

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET FOTYGA Anna (icon: ECR ECR) MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole (icon: PPE PPE), FREUND Eugen (icon: S&D S&D), AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras (icon: ALDE ALDE), HARMS Rebecca (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 118

Events

2019/03/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/03/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 148 with 30 abstentions a resolution containing a recommendation to the Council and the Vice President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning taking stock of the follow-up taken by the EEAS two years after the EP report on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties.

State of play 2018 - Tackling hybrid warfare

Parliament underlined that freedom of speech and expression as well as media pluralism are at the heart of resilient democratic societies, and provide the best safeguards against disinformation campaigns and hostile propaganda. It proposed to the European Council that counteracting disinformation and hostile propaganda should be given priority with sufficient resources and instruments to safeguard objective reporting and dissemination of information.

It suggested developing a legal framework both at EU and international level for tackling hybrid threats, including cyber and information warfare, that would allow for a robust response by the Union, covering targeted sanctions against those responsible for orchestrating these campaigns.

The VP/HR and the Commission were called on to become more closely involved in this area by preparing a thorough assessment of the new regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the upcoming e-Privacy Regulation, as a safeguard against malicious use of social platforms.

Member States were called on to:

- invest proactively in educational measures that explain the different ways of producing and disseminating disinformation in order to improve citizens’ ability to detect and respond to disinformation;

- ensure an effective exchange of information between all of their relevant authorities for tackling propaganda, manipulation and disinformation, including the cyber and information warfare.

Misinformation, disinformation and propaganda targeting the EU and its neighbours

Members recommend adapting the EU’s and Member States’ response to the continuously growing sophistication of the tools used to create and to spread disinformation, including the new ways of spreading propaganda by using multiple low-level websites, private messaging apps, search engine optimisation, online news portals and TV stations to disseminate the main narratives.

They strongly condemned the increasingly aggressive actions of Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and others in this context, which seek to undermine or suspend the normative foundations and principles of European democracies and the sovereignty of all Eastern Partnership countries, as well as influence elections and support extremist movements, taking into account that the scale of cyber attacks is constantly growing.

Industry and social media

While acknowledging a new investment of effort by social media companies to tackle disinformation, Members stressed that special attention should be paid to the effective implementation of the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation. They recommended regulating the actions of social media companies, messenger services and search engine providers and making it possible to uncover the identity and location not only of the authors, but also of the sponsors of the submitted political content. Parliament wanted to ensure that companies are held to account for the social impact of automated recommendation systems that promote disinformation, stressing that companies have a responsibility to speedily take down systemic fake news. Technology companies were called upon to invest more in tools identifying propaganda, in improving online accountability and in ensuring better identity checks of users before joining the respective platforms in order to eliminate botnets, as well in reducing financial incentives for those who profit from disinformation. Social media companies must react urgently when suspicious content of a political nature is disseminated, particularly if it incites to hate or crime.

Safeguarding elections from hostile propaganda

Members strongly condemned the interference of third parties of any kind, including private companies, in elections and referenda, and the malicious use of bots, algorithms, artificial intelligence, trolls, deep fakes and fake accounts in political campaigns and called on the Member States affected to urgently conduct, with the support of Eurojust if necessary, thorough investigations into these hostile campaigns.

They were concerned about recent developments in the algorithms of large social networks and their potentially harmful role in highlighting content containing false information or hate speech. They invited Member States to ensure that electoral laws take into account possible threats stemming from disinformation campaigns, cyber attacks, cybercrimes and violations of freedom of expression when voting. These laws should be adequately amended to enable Member States to effectively and proactively counteract such threats. Member States were asked to adapt their electoral rules on online campaigning, and to monitor the transparency features in relation to political advertising introduced by the online platforms.

Parliament called for legislation to address data use in election campaigning, following the exposure of data misuse by Cambridge Analytica in the 2016 UK referendum campaign, in order to further safeguard future election campaigns from undue influence.

Best practices

Parliament stressed the need to develop greater resilience based on all-government and all-society approaches, and the ability to respond to threats in real time, develop pre-emptive and proactive measures and think one step ahead, rather than merely reacting to and analysing attacks that have already taken place in the cyber and information domains. It recommended drawing attention to the technical progress in this field and sharing examples of best practice in the form of measures already taken by individual Member States, while developing ways of fostering close cooperation with the United Kingdom after Brexit, and working in cooperation with the intelligence community and allies such as the US and Canada, NATO and the EU Intelligence and Situation Centre.

Documents
2019/03/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/03/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/01/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Anna Elżbieta FOTYGA (ECR, PL) on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council and the Vice President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning taking stock of the follow-up taken by the EEAS two years after the EP report on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties.

State of play 2018 - Tackling hybrid warfare

Members stressed that freedom of speech and expression as well as media pluralism are at the heart of resilient democratic societies, and provide the best safeguards against disinformation campaigns and hostile propaganda.

They considered developing a legal framework both at EU and international level for tackling hybrid threats, including cyber and information warfare, that would allow for a robust response by the Union, also covering targeted sanctions against those responsible for orchestrating and implementing these campaigns, the need for which was demonstrated in particular by the hostile actions of state and non-state actors in these areas.

The VP/HR and the Commission are called on to become more closely involved in this area by preparing a thorough assessment of the new regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the upcoming e-Privacy Regulation, as a safeguard against malicious use of social platforms.

Member States are called on to:

- invest proactively in educational measures that explain the different ways of producing and disseminating disinformation in order to improve citizens’ ability to detect and respond to disinformation;

- ensure an effective exchange of information between all of their relevant authorities for tackling propaganda, manipulation and disinformation, including the cyber and information warfare.

Misinformation, disinformation and propaganda targeting the EU and its neighbours

Members recommend adapting the EU’s and Member States’ response to the continuously growing sophistication of the tools used to create and to spread disinformation, including the new ways of spreading propaganda by using multiple low-level websites, private messaging apps, search engine optimisation, online news portals and TV stations to disseminate the main narratives.

They strongly condemned the increasingly aggressive actions of Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and others in this context, which seek to undermine or suspend the normative foundations and principles of European democracies and the sovereignty of all Eastern Partnership countries, as well as influence elections and support extremist movements, taking into account that the scale of cyberattacks is constantly growing.

Industry and social media

While acknowledging a new investment of effort by social media companies to tackle disinformation, Members stressed that special attention should be paid to the effective implementation of the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation, while also inviting EU neighbour and partner countries to sign up to the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation. They recommended regulating the actions of social media companies, messenger services and search engine providers and ensure their full transparency and, in particular, accountability, adopting an EU-wide approach, and making it possible to uncover the identity and location not only of the authors, but also of the sponsors of the submitted political content.

Member States, candidate countries and associated countries are urged to adopt effective and clear legislation that ensures the transparency of media ownership.

Safeguarding elections from hostile propaganda

Members strongly condemned the interference of third parties of any kind, including private companies, in elections and referenda, and the malicious use of bots, algorithms, artificial intelligence, trolls, deep fakes and fake accounts in political campaigns and to call on the affected Member States to urgently conduct, with the support of Eurojust if necessary, thorough investigations into these hostile campaigns.

They are concerned about recent developments in the algorithms of large social networks and their potentially harmful role in highlighting content containing false information or hate speech. They invited Member States to ensure that electoral laws take into account possible threats stemming from disinformation campaigns, cyber attacks, cybercrimes and violations of freedom of expression when voting. These laws should be adequately amended to enable Member States to effectively and proactively counteract such threats.

The report called for legislation to address data use in election campaigning, following the exposure of data misuse by Cambridge Analytica in the 2016 UK referendum campaign, in order to further safeguard future election campaigns from undue influence.

Documents
2019/01/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/12/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/11/07
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/06/14
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2018/02/22
   EP - FOTYGA Anna (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0031/2019 - Anna Elżbieta Fotyga - Am 1 13/03/2019 13:03:12.000 #

2019/03/13 Outcome: -: 583, +: 60, 0: 25
EE LU EL CY MT LT LV SI SK IE DK AT HU HR FI NL CZ BE BG PT SE FR RO GB IT PL ES DE
Total
3
4
11
6
6
10
8
8
12
10
13
15
19
11
12
26
19
19
17
18
19
69
27
61
61
47
50
86
icon: ENF ENF
31

Austria ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
67

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Bulgaria ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: S&D S&D
175

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
188

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0031/2019 - Anna Elżbieta Fotyga - Recommandation commission AFET 13/03/2019 13:05:29.000 #

2019/03/13 Outcome: +: 489, -: 148, 0: 30
DE PL RO IT GB ES BG CZ BE SK HU HR NL PT SE FR LT FI AT MT DK SI LV LU EE IE CY EL
Total
87
47
26
60
62
48
17
20
19
12
17
11
26
18
19
69
10
11
15
6
12
8
8
4
5
10
6
13
icon: PPE PPE
187

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Greece PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
175
3

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
31

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

France Verts/ALE

6

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
AmendmentsDossier
262 2018/2115(INI)
2018/12/05 AFET 262 amendments...
source: 631.900

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-623704_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-631900_EN.html
events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2019-03-12-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: FOTYGA Anna date: 2018-02-22T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: FOTYGA Anna date: 2018-02-22T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.704
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.900
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2019-01-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0031_EN.html title: A8-0031/2019
summary
events/2
date
2019-01-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0031_EN.html title: A8-0031/2019
summary
events/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190312&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/4
date
2019-03-13T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32101&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2019-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0187_EN.html title: T8-0187/2019
summary
events/5
date
2019-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0187_EN.html title: T8-0187/2019
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0031&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0031_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0187
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0187_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: FOTYGA Anna date: 2018-02-22T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-02-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FOTYGA Anna group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
activities
  • date: 2018-06-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole group: S&D name: FREUND Eugen group: ALDE name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-02-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta
  • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-02-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FOTYGA Anna group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2018-02-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta
docs
  • date: 2018-11-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE623.704 title: PE623.704 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-12-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.900 title: PE631.900 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2018-06-14T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2019-01-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2019-01-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0031&language=EN title: A8-0031/2019 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Anna Elżbieta FOTYGA (ECR, PL) on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council and the Vice President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning taking stock of the follow-up taken by the EEAS two years after the EP report on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties. State of play 2018 - Tackling hybrid warfare Members stressed that freedom of speech and expression as well as media pluralism are at the heart of resilient democratic societies, and provide the best safeguards against disinformation campaigns and hostile propaganda. They considered developing a legal framework both at EU and international level for tackling hybrid threats, including cyber and information warfare, that would allow for a robust response by the Union, also covering targeted sanctions against those responsible for orchestrating and implementing these campaigns, the need for which was demonstrated in particular by the hostile actions of state and non-state actors in these areas. The VP/HR and the Commission are called on to become more closely involved in this area by preparing a thorough assessment of the new regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the upcoming e-Privacy Regulation, as a safeguard against malicious use of social platforms. Member States are called on to: - invest proactively in educational measures that explain the different ways of producing and disseminating disinformation in order to improve citizens’ ability to detect and respond to disinformation; - ensure an effective exchange of information between all of their relevant authorities for tackling propaganda, manipulation and disinformation, including the cyber and information warfare. Misinformation, disinformation and propaganda targeting the EU and its neighbours Members recommend adapting the EU’s and Member States’ response to the continuously growing sophistication of the tools used to create and to spread disinformation, including the new ways of spreading propaganda by using multiple low-level websites, private messaging apps, search engine optimisation, online news portals and TV stations to disseminate the main narratives. They strongly condemned the increasingly aggressive actions of Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and others in this context, which seek to undermine or suspend the normative foundations and principles of European democracies and the sovereignty of all Eastern Partnership countries, as well as influence elections and support extremist movements, taking into account that the scale of cyberattacks is constantly growing. Industry and social media While acknowledging a new investment of effort by social media companies to tackle disinformation, Members stressed that special attention should be paid to the effective implementation of the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation, while also inviting EU neighbour and partner countries to sign up to the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation. They recommended regulating the actions of social media companies, messenger services and search engine providers and ensure their full transparency and, in particular, accountability, adopting an EU-wide approach, and making it possible to uncover the identity and location not only of the authors, but also of the sponsors of the submitted political content. Member States, candidate countries and associated countries are urged to adopt effective and clear legislation that ensures the transparency of media ownership. Safeguarding elections from hostile propaganda Members strongly condemned the interference of third parties of any kind, including private companies, in elections and referenda, and the malicious use of bots, algorithms, artificial intelligence, trolls, deep fakes and fake accounts in political campaigns and to call on the affected Member States to urgently conduct, with the support of Eurojust if necessary, thorough investigations into these hostile campaigns. They are concerned about recent developments in the algorithms of large social networks and their potentially harmful role in highlighting content containing false information or hate speech. They invited Member States to ensure that electoral laws take into account possible threats stemming from disinformation campaigns, cyber attacks, cybercrimes and violations of freedom of expression when voting. These laws should be adequately amended to enable Member States to effectively and proactively counteract such threats. The report called for legislation to address data use in election campaigning, following the exposure of data misuse by Cambridge Analytica in the 2016 UK referendum campaign, in order to further safeguard future election campaigns from undue influence.
  • date: 2019-03-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190312&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2019-03-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0187 title: T8-0187/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 148 with 30 abstentions a resolution containing a recommendation to the Council and the Vice President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning taking stock of the follow-up taken by the EEAS two years after the EP report on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties. State of play 2018 - Tackling hybrid warfare Parliament underlined that freedom of speech and expression as well as media pluralism are at the heart of resilient democratic societies, and provide the best safeguards against disinformation campaigns and hostile propaganda. It proposed to the European Council that counteracting disinformation and hostile propaganda should be given priority with sufficient resources and instruments to safeguard objective reporting and dissemination of information. It suggested developing a legal framework both at EU and international level for tackling hybrid threats, including cyber and information warfare, that would allow for a robust response by the Union, covering targeted sanctions against those responsible for orchestrating these campaigns. The VP/HR and the Commission were called on to become more closely involved in this area by preparing a thorough assessment of the new regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the upcoming e-Privacy Regulation, as a safeguard against malicious use of social platforms. Member States were called on to: - invest proactively in educational measures that explain the different ways of producing and disseminating disinformation in order to improve citizens’ ability to detect and respond to disinformation; - ensure an effective exchange of information between all of their relevant authorities for tackling propaganda, manipulation and disinformation, including the cyber and information warfare. Misinformation, disinformation and propaganda targeting the EU and its neighbours Members recommend adapting the EU’s and Member States’ response to the continuously growing sophistication of the tools used to create and to spread disinformation, including the new ways of spreading propaganda by using multiple low-level websites, private messaging apps, search engine optimisation, online news portals and TV stations to disseminate the main narratives. They strongly condemned the increasingly aggressive actions of Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and others in this context, which seek to undermine or suspend the normative foundations and principles of European democracies and the sovereignty of all Eastern Partnership countries, as well as influence elections and support extremist movements, taking into account that the scale of cyber attacks is constantly growing. Industry and social media While acknowledging a new investment of effort by social media companies to tackle disinformation, Members stressed that special attention should be paid to the effective implementation of the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation. They recommended regulating the actions of social media companies, messenger services and search engine providers and making it possible to uncover the identity and location not only of the authors, but also of the sponsors of the submitted political content. Parliament wanted to ensure that companies are held to account for the social impact of automated recommendation systems that promote disinformation, stressing that companies have a responsibility to speedily take down systemic fake news. Technology companies were called upon to invest more in tools identifying propaganda, in improving online accountability and in ensuring better identity checks of users before joining the respective platforms in order to eliminate botnets, as well in reducing financial incentives for those who profit from disinformation. Social media companies must react urgently when suspicious content of a political nature is disseminated, particularly if it incites to hate or crime. Safeguarding elections from hostile propaganda Members strongly condemned the interference of third parties of any kind, including private companies, in elections and referenda, and the malicious use of bots, algorithms, artificial intelligence, trolls, deep fakes and fake accounts in political campaigns and called on the Member States affected to urgently conduct, with the support of Eurojust if necessary, thorough investigations into these hostile campaigns. They were concerned about recent developments in the algorithms of large social networks and their potentially harmful role in highlighting content containing false information or hate speech. They invited Member States to ensure that electoral laws take into account possible threats stemming from disinformation campaigns, cyber attacks, cybercrimes and violations of freedom of expression when voting. These laws should be adequately amended to enable Member States to effectively and proactively counteract such threats. Member States were asked to adapt their electoral rules on online campaigning, and to monitor the transparency features in relation to political advertising introduced by the online platforms. Parliament called for legislation to address data use in election campaigning, following the exposure of data misuse by Cambridge Analytica in the 2016 UK referendum campaign, in order to further safeguard future election campaigns from undue influence. Best practices Parliament stressed the need to develop greater resilience based on all-government and all-society approaches, and the ability to respond to threats in real time, develop pre-emptive and proactive measures and think one step ahead, rather than merely reacting to and analysing attacks that have already taken place in the cyber and information domains. It recommended drawing attention to the technical progress in this field and sharing examples of best practice in the form of measures already taken by individual Member States, while developing ways of fostering close cooperation with the United Kingdom after Brexit, and working in cooperation with the intelligence community and allies such as the US and Canada, NATO and the EU Intelligence and Situation Centre.
  • date: 2019-03-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Rules of Procedure EP 159
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/13396
    New
    • AFET/8/13396
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 118
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 0113
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Procedure completed
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.30.08 Press, media freedom and pluralism
    • 3.30.16 Ethical information policy
    • 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet
    • 6.40 Relations with third countries
    New
    3.30.08
    Press, media freedom and pluralism
    3.30.16
    Ethical information policy
    3.30.25
    International information networks and society, internet
    6.40
    Relations with third countries
    procedure/summary
    • See also
    procedure/type
    Old
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    New
    • INI - Own-initiative procedure
    • See also 2016/2030(INI)
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows/5
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    HARMS Rebecca
    committees/0/shadows/5
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    HARMS Rebecca
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Old
    Rules of Procedure EP 011
    New
    Rules of Procedure EP 0113
    activities
    • date: 2018-06-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole group: S&D name: FREUND Eugen group: ALDE name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-02-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta
    • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole group: S&D name: FREUND Eugen group: ALDE name: AUŠTREVIČIUS Petras group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: GUE/NGL name: VERGIAT Marie-Christine responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-02-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/13396
      reference
      2018/2115(INI)
      title
      Taking stock of the follow-up taken by the EEAS two years after the EP Report on EU strategic communication to counteract propaganda against it by third parties. Recommendation to the Vice President/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and to the Council
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure EP 011
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      summary
      See also
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject