Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian ( S&D) | ZOVKO Željana ( PPE), TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton ( ECR), VEHKAPERÄ Mirja ( ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard ( Verts/ALE), CHAUPRADE Aymeric ( EFDD) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | SCHWAB Andreas ( PPE) | Jiří MAŠTÁLKA ( GUE/NGL), Richard SULÍK ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | BEGHIN Tiziana ( EFDD) | Marietje SCHAAKE ( ALDE), Joachim STARBATTY ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 114
Legal Basis:
RoP 114Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 132, with 81 abstentions, a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation.
Background
According to Eurostat data, in 2017 Switzerland was the EU’s third-biggest partner in terms of export of goods and its fourth biggest in terms of import of goods. Switzerland is part of the Schengen area. It is a member of the European Environment Agency; it participates in the EU's Horizon 2020 Research Framework Programme and has ratified its participation in the European satellite navigation programmes Galileo and EGNOS.
On 28 September 2018, the Federal Council approved Switzerland's second contribution to a number of EU Member States, amounting to CHF 1.3 billion over ten years, and is now awaiting a positive decision from the Federal Assembly.
Switzerland’s current relationship with the EU is based on a complex set of some 20 main sectoral bilateral agreements and around 100 other agreements; whereas Switzerland only partially participates in all four freedoms. The Council stated that an overarching institutional agreement with Switzerland should aim to protect the homogeneity of the internal market and ensure legal certainty for authorities, citizens and economic operators.
For its part, the Swiss Federal Council wishes to conclude an institutional agreement with the EU that guarantees legal certainty in terms of market access and preserves Switzerland's prosperity, independence and legal system.
A close partnership
Parliament stressed that Switzerland and the EU enjoy a close partnership, that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU and that both sides share the same values and face the same regional and global challenges. Switzerland's integration into the EU's internal market is a fundamental factor for economic growth, making the European Union Switzerland's main economic and trade partner.
Members called for the conclusion of the institutional framework agreement as soon as possible, in order to bring coherence to the complex system of 120 existing bilateral agreements, including the establishment of a dispute settlement mechanism.
Securing an Interinstitutional Framework Agreement (IFA) with Switzerland is of great importance, since it would guarantee legal certainty for both Switzerland and the EU, dynamic incorporation of the EU acquis, enhanced access to the internal market for Switzerland to the benefit of both sides, and the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the event of unresolved disputes relating to the application or interpretation of the IFA.
Parliament welcomed the fact that the negotiators had agreed on the final text of the agreement and invited the Swiss Federal Council to take the decision to conclude the agreement as soon as the stakeholder consultation had produced a positive outcome in this respect. It asked the parties to organise an interparliamentary meeting of the legislators of the Union and Switzerland as soon as possible, so that they could discuss all aspects of this agreement.
Free movement of persons
Stressing that the free movement of persons is a fundamental and non-negotiable pillar of EU policy, Members took note of the implementation of the ‘domestic preference light’ initiative, and the fact that, according to the Council, the resultant text can be implemented in a manner compatible with the rights of EU citizens under the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons provided that the necessary implementing order resolves outstanding issues, such as the right to information on job offers and respect for the rights of frontier workers.
However, Members pointed out that the question of migration of citizens from third countries should not be confused with the free movement of persons as enshrined in the Treaties; underlines the need to monitor the implementation of the ordinance closely with a view to assessing its compliance with the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons.
Switzerland's contribution to European programmes
Members considered that Switzerland's financial contributions to programmes such as the Cohesion Fund are in its own interest and should be continued, welcoming the positive effects of Switzerland's contribution on the beneficiary Member States. They recalled that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the single market and stressed that the future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably, in line with the example set by the EEA/Norway.
Public procurement and services
Members expressed their support for a revised trade partnership covering areas such as services, including digital services, intellectual property rights, trade facilitation, mutual recognition in conformity assessment and public procurement, and including a chapter on trade and sustainable development. They called for deeper cooperation to better protect geographical indications and for an expansion of the bilateral dispute settlement mechanism.
Switzerland is invited to continue its efforts to align its ‘Digital Switzerland’ strategy with the European digital single market. It is also invited to apply the relevant EU directives in order to maintain its current level of social protection and wages in the context of cross-border service provision.
Members stressed the need to continue to deepen cooperation in order to combat tax evasion and enhance tax justice.
The Parliament welcomed Switzerland's contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration in the Schengen area and the implementation of the European agenda on migration. It welcomed Switzerland's association with the entire Horizon 2020 programme and invited Switzerland to start negotiations on its association with the Erasmus programmes.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted a report by Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ (S&D, RO) on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning the Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation.
The Committee on International Trade, exercising its prerogative as an associated committee, also expressed its opinion.
The Council stated that the objective of a comprehensive institutional agreement with Switzerland should be to protect the homogeneity of the internal market and ensure legal certainty for authorities, citizens and economic operators. For its part, the Swiss Federal Council wishes to conclude an institutional agreement with the Union that guarantees legal certainty in terms of market access and preserves Switzerland's prosperity, independence and legal system.
A close partnership
Members stressed that Switzerland and the EU enjoy a close partnership, that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU and that both sides share the same values and face the same regional and global challenges. Switzerland's integration into the EU's internal market is a fundamental factor for economic growth, making the European Union Switzerland's main economic and trade partner.
Members called for the conclusion of the institutional framework agreement as soon as possible, in order to bring coherence to the complex system of 120 existing bilateral agreements, including the establishment of a dispute settlement mechanism. They welcomed the fact that the negotiators had agreed on the final text of the agreement and invited the Swiss Federal Council to take the decision to conclude the agreement as soon as the stakeholder consultation had produced a positive outcome in this respect. They asked the parties to organise an interparliamentary meeting of the legislators of the Union and Switzerland as soon as possible, so that they could discuss all aspects of this agreement.
Free movement of persons
Stressing that the free movement of persons is a fundamental and non-negotiable pillar of EU policy, Members took note of the implementation of the ‘domestic preference light’ initiative, and the fact that, according to the Council, the resultant text can be implemented in a manner compatible with the rights of EU citizens under the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons provided that the necessary implementing order resolves outstanding issues, such as the right to information on job offers and respect for the rights of frontier workers.
However, Members pointed out that the question of migration of citizens from third countries should not be confused with the free movement of persons as enshrined in the Treaties; underlines the need to monitor the implementation of the ordinance closely with a view to assessing its compliance with the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons.
Switzerland's contribution to European programmes
Members considered that Switzerland's financial contributions to programmes such as the Cohesion Fund are in its own interest and should be continued, welcoming the positive effects of Switzerland's contribution on the beneficiary Member States. They recalled that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the single market and stressed that the future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably, in line with the example set by the EEA/Norway.
Public procurement and services
Members expressed their support for a revised trade partnership covering areas such as services, including digital services, intellectual property rights, trade facilitation, mutual recognition in conformity assessment and public procurement, and including a chapter on trade and sustainable development. They called for deeper cooperation to better protect geographical indications and for an expansion of the bilateral dispute settlement mechanism.
Switzerland is invited to continue its efforts to align its ‘Digital Switzerland’ strategy with the European digital single market. It is also invited to apply the relevant EU directives in order to maintain its current level of social protection and wages in the context of cross-border service provision.
Members stressed the need to continue to deepen cooperation in order to combat tax evasion and enhance tax justice.
The report also welcomed:
- Switzerland's role as a facilitator in implementing complex federal structures and peace-brokered, constitutional arrangements, in order to ease the coexistence of different ethnic backgrounds;
- Switzerland's participation in and support for EU security and defence missions, such as EUFOR, ALTHEA, EULEX Kosovo, EUTM Mali and EUBAM Libya, and the work of the European Defence Agency;
- Switzerland's contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration in the Schengen area and the implementation of the European Agenda on Migration.
Members welcomed Switzerland's association with the entire Horizon 2020 programme and called for continued cooperation in future research programmes. They invited Switzerland to start negotiations on its association with the Erasmus programmes.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0241/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0147/2019
- Committee opinion: PE630.624
- Committee opinion: PE632.768
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.825
- Committee draft report: PE630.430
- Committee draft report: PE630.430
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE632.825
- Committee opinion: PE632.768
- Committee opinion: PE630.624
Votes
A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Am 1 26/03/2019 13:27:16.000 #
A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Am 3 26/03/2019 13:27:31.000 #
A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Recommandation 26/03/2019 13:28:22.000 #
A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Am 1 #
A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Am 3 #
A8-0147/2019 - Doru-Claudian Frunzulică - Recommandation #
Amendments | Dossier |
114 |
2018/2262(INI)
2019/01/10
AFET
76 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Swiss Federal Council
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas Switzerland has expressed its wish to leave binding material provisions on State aid for a future market access agreement and have access to the single market for electricity; whereas the Swiss Federal Council has announced a stakeholder consultation on the basis of the text agreed between the negotiators;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas on 28 September 2018 the Federal Council approved the second Swiss contribution to a number of EU member states of CHF 1.3 billion over ten years and is now awaiting a positive decision of the Federal Assembly;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas Switzerland is member of the European Environment Agency;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D c (new) Dc. whereas Switzerland ratified participation in the European satellite navigation programmes Galileo and EGNOS;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D d (new) Dd. whereas Switzerland participates in the EU MEDIA programme, which encourages the development of European film industry, vocational training and distribution of European films;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D e (new) De. whereas Switzerland’s participation in the EU’s Horizon 2020 research framework programme and its predecessor Framework Programme 7 (FP7) has been valuable to all parties involved due to the high quality of proposals;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas Switzerland and the EU signed a
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas Switzerland cooperates in the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and has participated in the civil and military peace missions of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), notably in Ukraine and Mali; whereas the EDA-Switzerland Framework for Cooperation signed in March 2012 enables exchange of information and foresees joint activities in research and technology and armament projects and programmes;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas Switzerland cooperates in the selected parts of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and has participated in the civil and military peace missions of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), notably in Ukraine and Mali;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas based on the Dublin association agreement, Switzerland is associated to parts of the EU asylum acquis; whereas Switzerland has contributed financially and operationally to Frontex since 2010
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas in 2017, the Swiss population of 8.48 million included 2.13 million foreign nationals, 1.4 million of whom came from Member States of the EU and European Free Trade Association (EFTA); whereas 320 000 EU citizens commute to Switzerland every day
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas in 2009, Switzerland agreed to continue the 1999 bilateral EU- Switzerland Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP),which confers upon the Swiss and the EU member states’ citizens alike the right to freely choose their place of employment and residence within the national territories of the contracting parties;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas Switzerland introduced ‘flanking measures’ in 2002 with the stated aim of protecting Swiss wages, working conditions and social standards, which the EU considers to be disproportionate and discriminating against EU operators;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas Switzerland introduced
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas Switzerland has been a member of EFTA since 1960 and of the United Nations since 2002;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas the ‘Swiss law, not foreign judges" (Self-Determination Initiative)’ was rejected by popular vote by 66 % and by all cantons on 25 November 2018;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas Switzerland is committed to political neutrality and as such has been the host to a number of international negotiations aiming to reach peaceful solutions to armed conflicts around the world;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 14 — having regard to the 1972 EU- Switzerland Free Trade Agreement, which has been
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O b (new) Ob. whereas the European Commission in late 2018 extended for six months its decision to recognise trading venues in Switzerland as eligible for compliance with the trading obligation for shares set out in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and Regulation (equivalence);
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) is based in Geneva;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O b (new) Ob. whereas Switzerland hosts 25 major international organizations and conferences as their worldwide headquarters, most of them in Geneva;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O c (new) Oc. whereas hundreds of international non-governmental organizations are based in Switzerland providing advice to the UN and other non-governmental organizations;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O d (new) Od. whereas Switzerland plans to hold Federal elections on 20 October 2019;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point a a) highlights that Switzerland and the EU enjoy close, broad and comprehensive relations, and that economic, political, social, environmental, scientific and people-to-people ties and links are strong, recalling the unique cultural and geographical proximity between the two;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point a a) highlights that Switzerland and the EU enjoy close, broad and comprehensive relations, and that economic, political, social, scientific and people-to-people ties and links are
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point b b) stresses that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU, is a close-minded partner and shares European regional and global challenges with the EU; welcomes the Swiss statement that it is in its interest
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point b b) welcomes the Swiss statement that it is in
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point b a (new) ba) highlights that the EU has shown great flexibility in the negotiations for the IFA and that this has to be recognised by all parties concerned;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 — having regard to the negotiations on an EU-Swiss Confederation electricity agreement,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c c) urges th
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c c) urges that the EU
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c c) urges that the EU’s relations with its close partner, Switzerland, be elevated through the timely conclusion of the negotiations on the bilateral institutional framework agreement aimed at bringing coherence to the existing situation including a dispute settlement mechanism and highlights the potential to further intensify the relations that are already in place;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d (d) stresses that the free movement of persons is a fundamental pillar of EU policy and the internal market, and that its four freedoms are indivisible;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d d) stresses, alongside the Council, that the free movement of persons is a fundamental pillar of EU policy and the internal market, and that its four freedoms are indivisible; expresses regret at the disproportionate one-sided ‘flanking measures’ of Switzerland that have been in force since 200
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d d) stresses that the free movement of persons is a fundamental pillar of EU policy and the internal market, and that its four freedoms are indivisible; expresses regret at the one-sided ‘flanking measures’ of Switzerland that have been in force since 2002; and invites Switzerland and the EU to come to a mutually acceptable agreement on the issue; expresses regret that Switzerland decided on 7 December 2018 to extend the transitional measures for Croatian workers beyond the initial period of two years, and accordingly invites Switzerland to consider shortening the period of application of these transitional measures bearing in mind benefits of the free movement of persons between the EU and Switzerland;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d d) stresses that the free movement of persons is a fundamental, and non- negotiable, pillar of EU policy and the internal market, and that its four freedoms are indivisible; expresses regret at the one- sided, disproportionate and discriminatory ‘flanking measures’ of Switzerland that have been in force since 2002; and invites Switzerland and the EU to come to a mutually acceptable agreement on the issue;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d d) stresses that the free movement of persons is a fundamental pillar of EU policy and the internal market, and that its four freedoms are indivisible; expresses regret at the one-sided
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point e e) underlines
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point e e) underlines the fact that Switzerland should continue making a significant financial contribution in an effort to reduce economic and social disparities in the EU and welcomes the positive results of the contribution in the receiving Member States; recalls that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the Single Market; stresses that future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably along the practice set by EEA/Norway grants;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 19 — having regard to its resolutions on Switzerland, in particular of
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point e (e) underlines the fact that Switzerland should continue making a
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point e a (new) ea) regrets, that despite no rapid growth in the numbers of Croatians working in Switzerland, Switzerland extended the transitional measures for Croatian workers and self-employed beyond the initial period of two years; calls on the Swiss authorities to consider shortening the period of application of the transitional measures, particularly in view of the undoubted economic benefits of free movement of labour between the EU and Switzerland;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f f) suggests that
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f f)
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f f) suggests that Switzerland better explain to its citizens the need for a very close partnership with the EU as well as the many tangible benefits they reap on a daily basis from having access to the internal market and a closer cooperation with the EU;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point g g) urges that once concluded, the institutional agreement be submitted without delay to the European Parliament, the Member States, and the Swiss Parliament for approval, and a referendum by the Swiss electorate, in accordance with the Swiss constitution;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point g g) urges that once concluded, the institutional agreement should be submitted without any delay to the European Parliament, the Member States, and the Swiss Parliament for approval;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point h h) notes that
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point h h) notes that
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point h h)
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Switzerland’s current relationship with the EU is based on a complex set of some 20 main sectoral bilateral agreements and around 100 other agreements; whereas thanks to these agreements EU and Switzerland could cooperate in the fields of internal market, internal security and asylum, transport and tax matters, even if Switzerland only partially participates in all four freedoms;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point j j) acknowledges the contribution t
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point j j) acknowledges the contribution that the close EU-Swiss partnership brings to the bilateral sectoral agreements; urges, however, that it is high time to elevate the partnership and take a much more comprehensive and substantial step in bilateral relations by concluding the framework agreement as early as possible;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point k k) welcomes the fact that
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point k k) welcomes the fact that, for a very long time, the promotion of peace, mediation and peaceful conflict resolution ha
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point k a (new) ka) welcomes the Swiss role as a facilitator in implementing complex federal structures, peace-brokered, constitutional arrangements in order to help coexistence of different ethnics backgrounds such as in Nepal and Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point l l) welcomes the participation and support of Switzerland in EU security and defence missions, such as in EUFOR ALTHEA, EULEX Kosovo, EUTM Mali and EUBAM Libya, and in the work of the European Defence Agency; welcomes close cooperation with Switzerland on humanitarian aid, civil protection, counter- terrorism and climate change;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point m m) acknowledges the Swiss contribution and cooperation in the context of
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point m m) acknowledges the Swiss contribution and cooperation in the context
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point m (m) acknowledges the Swiss contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration flows to the Schengen area and in the implementation of the European Agenda on Migration;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point m a (new) ma) welcomes the Alp Transit project, also known as The New Railway Link through the Alps (NRLA), as a good example of Swiss funded investment which is also beneficial for the EU internal market trade;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas Switzerland’s current relationship with the EU is based on a complex set of some 20 main sectoral bilateral agreements and around 100 other agreements; whereas Switzerland only partially participates in all four freedoms; whereas the future implementation of this complex set of agreements cannot be guaranteed unless an overarching framework is agreed upon;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point n n)
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point n a (new) na) ensure that the Institutional Framework agreement between the EU and Switzerland contains a tax good governance clause including specific rules on State aid under the form of a tax advantage, transparency requirements regarding the automatic exchange of information on taxation and beneficial ownership as well as anti-money laundering provisions;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point n a (new) na) welcomes Switzerland joining the Europol joint cybercrime action taskforce (J-CAT) in April 2018, in the fight against international cybercrime threats in a proactive manner;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point o o) welcomes Switzerland’s association to the entire Horizon 2020 programme and hopes for further cooperation in the future research programmes;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point p p) urges
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point p p)
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point p a (new) pa) welcomes progress in the construction of the transalpine rail link (NEAT);
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the EU has a very close, and mutually beneficial, partnership with Switzerland, based on a joint cultural history and shared values such as democracy, the rule of law, freedom, market economy and international cooperation;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas according to Eurostat data, in 2107 Switzerland was the third biggest EU partner in terms of export of goods and the fourth biggest in terms of import of goods;
source: 632.825
2019/01/28
INTA
38 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the EU is Switzerland’s main trading partner, accounting for 52 % of its exports
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 g (new) 1 g. considers that the EU should not request the application of the rule of free and undistorted competency and the prohibition of necessary subsidies;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges the need for an Institutional Framework Agreement, as the EU-Switzerland relationship is based on a complex system of 120 sector-specific agreements, but that this agreement should not include the dismantling of the necessary social protections for Swiss and foreign workers, among others regarding the postponement of the age of retirement, the wages, or the reduction of the social security;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges the need for an Institutional Framework Agreement, as the EU-Switzerland relationship is based on a complex system of 120 sector-specific agreements, and additional coherence and legal certainty would benefit all parties;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Asks the Commission to immediately grant access to the negotiated text of the EU-Switzerland Framework Agreement, as finalized in December 2018, so that INTA and AFET can produce an informed opinion and report on the basis of facts;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Asks the Commission and the Council to withhold the ratification procedure of the EU-Switzerland Framework Agreement, until the consultation of the Swiss population is concluded.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the trading relationship to be modernised and for it to include areas such as services, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and trade facilitation, as well as to continue cooperating to improve the protection of Geographical Indications;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Welcomes the inclusion of a modern Dispute Settlement system in the draft IFA, which could apply to the future updated trade relationship;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Takes note that a EU-Switzerland agreement has been initialled on 7 December 2018. Calls on the Commission to send the document agreed to Parliament without delay. Notes that the EU is Switzerland’s main trading partner, accounting for 52 % of its exports, and Switzerland is the EU’s third-largest trading partner, accounting for 7 % of its trade;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is aware that there is no comprehensive services agreement in place between the EU and Switzerland and that services are only partially covered through the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP)
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that Switzerland takes in the highest percentage of cross-border workers from the EU and calls on the EU and the Swiss Government to improve measures under the AFMP by including a ‘charter for cross-border workers’ that sets out binding provisions covering, inter alia, basic employment rights, working and commuting conditions, transfer of unemployment benefits and double taxation issues; deplores that according to the leaks documents the new agreement would reduce from 8 to 4 the delay for the announcement of posted workers, what is making impossible the surveillance of their working conditions, and would have a negative impact on the structure of the job market, and on salaries;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. calls on the parties to organize as soon as possible an interparliamentary meeting of legislators of both the EU and Switzerland parties in order to discuss all matters related to this agreement;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the new tax legislation
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Welcomes the conclusion of the negotiations on the Institutional Framework Agreement (IFA) between the EU and the Swiss Confederation in December 2018 and calls for a swift stakeholder consultation, as called for by the Federal Council on 7 December 2018, and to proceed without delay with the ratification to urgently modernize and further expand the EU-Switzerland relationship, to increase legal certainty and guarantee continued access for Swiss companies to the Single Market as well as to permit the continuation and facilitation of ongoing sectoral negotiations;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Recalls that the bilateral trade relationship lacks a reliable State-to-State dispute-settlement mechanism, that would efficiently resolve trade irritants between the parties.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. . Understands that the new set of rules known as « dynamic update », which do not comply Switzerland to an « automatic update » of its legislation on matters adressed by the agreement, are nevertheless a serious move towards a jurisdictionnal integration of Swiss law into European law »
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Strongly welcomes the political declaration of intent issued by the two parties, expressing the willingness to enter into negotiations to bring the Agreement on Government Procurement and the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) of 1972 up to date.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Takes note of the revised law on public procurement adopted in 2017 in the canton of Ticino, which shall be compliant with the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement and the relevant EU-Switzerland sectoral agreement, in force since 2002; strongly encourages contracting authorities to treat EU suppliers and service providers in a non-discriminatory way, even in cases of procurement contracts below the threshold;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Acknowledges the right included in the agreement for Switzerland to participate to the « decision shaping », without the right to participate to the « decision making », only granted to EU members.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 c (new) 9 c. Expects that Switzerland, in case of a ratification of this agreement, will have to take tough and painful measures in order to deeply reform its State subsidies system »
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 d (new) 9 d. Hopes that Switzerland is fully aware that by accepting such an important reform of its State subsidies for matters adressed by the agreement, it won’t have no other choice than progressively give them all up (except those allowed by European law) in the next moves made under the institutionnal framework »
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 e (new) 9 e. Calls the European Council and the Commission to keep Switzerland part of the2021-2027 Program for Research and Innovation, even in the case of a refusal to approve the agreement within the end of spring »
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses the need for European negociators to understand and to firmly take into account, while negociating and even after any agreement has been struked, that arrogance, threats and ultimatums will always lead to the opposite of the goals initially looked for »
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Notices that the Swiss Federal Council did not officially approve the so- called« Institutionnal Framework Agreement » and that it has decided, before any approval by the Swiss Parliament or the Swiss people themselves, to submit the draft agreement to national stakeholders, consistent with Swiss democratic traditions and constitionnal principles
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Protests vigorously against the lack of respect normally due to Members of the European Parliament by the Commission, which has not transmitted the draft agreement to the Committee for Foreign Affairs and to the Committee for International Trade, even though the document is finalized for more than two months
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1 d. Understands completly Swiss preventions against any attempt to undermine its social legislation, particularly Swiss laws known as « flanking measures », and calls for a very cautious examination on this issue from both parties, in order to reach a real « win-win » agreement,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1 e. Notes that Switzerland is among the oldest European nations, known for long for its constant wish to preserve its independence, freedom and sovereignty, which has never prevented its people to trade with other countries and to share common values, especially with its neighbours;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 f (new) 1 f. considers that no ratification of a framework agreement is possible only if Switzerland takes tough measures to be removed from the list of "non cooperative countries on fiscal issues";
source: 634.550
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-630430_EN.html
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-632825_EN.html
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-632768_EN.html
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-630624_EN.html
|
committees/0/shadows/1/name |
Old
TANNOCK CharlesNew
TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.430
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.825
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE632.768&secondRef=02
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.624&secondRef=03
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0147&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0147_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0241New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0241_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/8/14791New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 114
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 108
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation. RecommendationNew
Institutional Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation. Recommendation |
activities/0/committees/1/date |
2018-11-19T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2018-11-19T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|