Progress: Awaiting final decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando ( S&D) | MELO Nuno ( EPP), KÖRNER Moritz ( Renew), LAGODINSKY Sergey ( Greens/EFA), KANKO Assita ( ECR), TARDINO Annalisa ( ID) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted, by 436 votes to 168, with 35 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision authorising Member States to ratify, in the interest of the European Union, the second additional protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced cooperation and disclosure of electronic evidence.
Following the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Parliament gave its consent to the Council's draft decision.
The draft Council decision aims to authorise Member States to ratify, in the interest of the EU, the second additional protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced cooperation and disclosure of electronic evidence.
The objective of the protocol is to strengthen cooperation on cybercrime and the collection of electronic evidence of a criminal offense for the purpose of specific investigations or criminal proceedings. The protocol recognises the need for increased and more efficient cooperation between States and the private sector, and greater clarity or legal certainty for service providers and other entities regarding the circumstances under which they may respond to requests from criminal justice authorities in other Parties for the disclosure of electronic evidence.
The protocol also recognises that effective conditions and guarantees in terms of protecting fundamental rights are essential for effective cross-border cooperation for criminal justice, including between the public and private sectors. To this end, the protocol follows a rights-based approach and provides for conditions and guarantees that conform to international human rights instruments, including the 1950 Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
The protocol also provides for strong safeguards for the protection of privacy and personal data.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to authorise Member States to ratify, in the interest of the European Union, the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.
BACKGROUND: cybercrime continues to represent a considerable challenge to our society. The borderless nature of the internet makes cybercrime investigations almost always cross-border in nature, thus requiring close cooperation between authorities in different countries.
As evidence of criminal offences is increasingly held in electronic form by service providers in the territory of foreign jurisdictions, and to enable an effective criminal justice response, it is necessary to obtain such evidence by appropriate measures in order to uphold the rule of law.
On 6 June 2019, the Council authorised the Commission to participate, on behalf of the Union, in the negotiations on a Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (CETS No. 185) (the Convention on Cybercrime).
The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime aims to facilitate the fight against criminal offences committed through computer networks. The Convention:
- contains provisions harmonising domestic criminal substantive law elements of offences and connected provisions in the area of cybercrime;
- provides for domestic criminal procedural law powers necessary for the investigation and prosecution of such offences as well as other offences committed by means of a computer system or where the evidence is in electronic form;
- aims to set up a fast and effective regime of international cooperation.
The Commission is committed to ensuring a swift conclusion of the negotiations on the Protocol. In participating in the negotiations on the Protocol, the Commission has ensured its compatibility with the relevant common rules of the Union. The European Parliament also recognised the need to conclude work on the Protocol in its 2021 resolution on the EU cybersecurity strategy for the digital decade.
The Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 November 2021 and is envisaged to be opened for signature on 12 May 2022.
The provisions of the Protocol fall within an area covered to a large extent by common rules within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), including instruments facilitating judicial cooperation in criminal matters, ensuring minimum standards of procedural rights as well as data protection and privacy safeguards.
CONTENT: the purpose of the draft Council Decision is to authorise Member States to ratify, in the interest of the European Union, the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime , on enhancing cooperation and the provision of electronic evidence.
The aim of the Protocol is to enhance co-operation on cybercrime and the collection of evidence in electronic form of a criminal offence for the purpose of specific criminal investigations or proceedings.
The Protocol recognises the need for increased and more efficient co-operation between States and with the private sector, and for greater clarity and legal certainty for service providers and other entities regarding the circumstances in which they may respond to requests from criminal justice authorities in other Parties for the disclosure of electronic evidence .
The Protocol also recognises that effective cross-border cooperation for criminal justice purposes, including between public sector authorities and private sector entities, requires effective conditions and strong safeguards for the protection of fundamental rights.
The Protocol:
- applies to specific criminal investigations or proceedings concerning criminal offences related to computer data and systems and to the collection of evidence in electronic form of a criminal offence;
- determines the languages in which the parties must submit orders, requests or notifications under the Protocol;
- provides for the widest possible mutual cooperation between the parties and provides for swift procedures that improve cross-border access to electronic evidence and a high level of safeguards. Its entry into force will contribute to the fight against cybercrime by facilitating cooperation between Member States party to the Protocol and third countries party to the Protocol, ensure a high level of protection for individuals and resolve conflicts of law.
The Protocol provides a basis for:
- direct co-operation between the competent authorities in the territory of one Party and entities providing domain name registration services in the territory of another Party, for the disclosure of domain name registration data;
- direct cooperation between the competent authorities in the territory of a Party and service providers in the territory of another Party, for the disclosure of subscriber data;
- enhanced cooperation between authorities for the disclosure of computer data;
- cooperation between authorities for the disclosure of computer data in emergency situations;
- mutual legal assistance in emergency cases;
- cooperation by videoconference;
- joint investigations and joint investigation teams.
The entry into force of the Protocol will help promote EU data protection standards at global level, facilitate data flows between Member State Parties and third-country Parties, and ensure compliance of Member State Parties with their obligations under Union data protection rules.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to authorise Member States to ratify, in the interest of the European Union, the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced cooperation and disclosure of electronic evidence.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.
BACKGROUND: cybercrime continues to represent a considerable challenge to society. Notwithstanding the efforts of law enforcement and judicial authorities, cyberattacks, including ransomware attacks, are increasing and are becoming more complex. The borderless nature of the internet makes cybercrime investigations almost always cross-border in nature, thus requiring close cooperation between authorities in different countries.
The Commission estimates that law enforcement and judicial authorities currently need access to electronic evidence in 85% of criminal investigations , including cybercrime. As evidence of criminal offences is increasingly held in electronic form by service providers on the territory of foreign jurisdictions, the Commission considers it necessary to obtain such evidence by appropriate measures to uphold the rule of law.
The Council of Europe's Budapest Convention on Cybercrime aims to facilitate the fight against criminal offences committed through computer networks. 66 countries are currently party to the Convention, including 26 EU Member States. The Convention does not provide for the European Union to accede to the Convention. However, the EU supports the Budapest Convention, which remains the main multilateral convention for combating cybercrime.
On 9 June 2019, the Council authorised the Commission to participate, on behalf of the Union, in the negotiations for the Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. The text of the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence was adopted by the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers on 17 November 2021 and is envisaged to be opened for signature in March 2022.
It is important that EU Member States take the necessary steps to implement and ratify rapidly the Protocol , as the Protocol:
- will ensure that law enforcement and judicial authorities are better equipped to obtain electronic evidence necessary for criminal investigations;
- will ensure that such measures to obtain access to electronic evidence will be used in a manner that allow Member States to respect fundamental rights, including criminal procedural rights, the right to privacy and the right to the protection of personal data;
- will resolve and prevent conflicts of law, affecting both authorities and private sector service providers and other entities, by providing compatible rules at international level for cross-border access to electronic evidence.
CONTENT: this proposal concerns the Decision authorising Member States to ratify, in the interest of the European Union, the Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe's Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence.
The purpose of the Protocol is to establish common rules at international level to enhance cooperation in relation to cybercrime and the gathering of evidence in electronic form for criminal investigations or proceedings.
The Protocol recognises the need for greater cooperation between States and the private sector and for greater legal certainty for service providers and other entities regarding the circumstances in which they may respond to requests for disclosure of electronic evidence from criminal justice authorities in other parties.
The Protocol provides a basis:
- for the direct cooperation between competent authorities in one Party and entities providing domain name registration services in another Party, for the disclosure of domain name registration data;
- for the direct cooperation between competent authorities in one Party and service providers in another Party for the disclosure of subscriber data;
- for enhanced cooperation between authorities for the disclosure of computer data and cooperation between authorities for the disclosure of computer data in emergency situations;
- for mutual legal assistance in emergency situations, cooperation by videoconference and for joint investigations and joint investigation teams.
The Protocol requires the parties to ensure that powers and procedures are subject to an adequate level of protection of fundamental rights.
Preparatory document
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0002/2023
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0002/2023
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0002/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE740.618
- Committee draft report: PE740.540
- Legislative proposal published: 06438/2022
- EDPS: OJ C 182 04.05.2022, p. 0015
- EDPS: N9-0021/2022
- Preparatory document: COM(2021)0719
- Preparatory document: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2021)0718
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Preparatory document: COM(2021)0719
- Preparatory document: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE740.540
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE740.618
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0002/2023
- Preparatory document: COM(2021)0719 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2021)0718 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- EDPS: OJ C 182 04.05.2022, p. 0015 N9-0021/2022
Votes
Convention sur la cybercriminalité relatif au renforcement de la coopération et de la divulgation de preuves électroniques: deuxième protocole additionnel - A9-0002/2023 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar - Projet de décision du Conseil #
Amendments | Dossier |
3 |
2021/0383(NLE)
2023/01/10
LIBE
3 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
source: 740.618
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/0/docs/1/title |
Old
EUR-LexNew
Go to the page Eur-Lex |
events/1/summary/30 |
Legislative proposal
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/summary/6 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=59298&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=59298 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
LIBE/9/07837 |
procedure/subtype |
Old
New
Consent by Parliament |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=04050202 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:182:TOC |
events/5 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Awaiting final decision |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0002_EN.html
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0002_EN.html
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-740618_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-740540_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Consent by ParliamentNew
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/summary |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
events/1/summary |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Consultation of ParliamentNew
Consent by Parliament |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
commission |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|