BETA


2023/0167(COD) Retail investor protection rules

Progress: Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON YON-COURTIN Stéphanie (icon: Renew Renew) SEEKATZ Ralf (icon: EPP EPP), HEINÄLUOMA Eero (icon: S&D S&D), KOVAŘÍK Ondřej (icon: PfE PfE), NESCI Denis (icon: ECR ECR), PREBILIČ Vladimir (icon: Greens/EFA Greens/EFA), SARAMO Jussi (icon: The Left The Left)
Former Responsible Committee ECON
Former Committee Opinion BUDG
Former Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 062, TFEU 053-p1

Events

2024/11/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2024/09/12
   EP - YON-COURTIN Stéphanie (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2024/04/23
   EP - Vote scheduled
2024/04/23
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2024/04/23
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71 - vote)
2024/04/10
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
2024/04/02
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.

The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:

Better frame the current advice environment

Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.

Best interest of customers

Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.

Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.

If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.

Assessment of the effectiveness of measures

The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.

In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.

In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.

Common European benchmarks

Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.

If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.

Finfluencers

Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.

Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.

Financial culture

Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.

Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading

Documents
2024/03/20
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2023/09/25
   CZ_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2023/07/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2023/05/25
   European Commission - Document attached to the procedure
2023/05/25
   European Commission - Document attached to the procedure
2023/05/25
   European Commission - Document attached to the procedure
2023/05/24
   European Commission - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to amend certain Directives as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.

PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: investor protection rules are currently set out across sector specific legislative instruments, including the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD), the Undertaking for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), and the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance Directive (Solvency II), as well as an amending Regulation, which revises the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Regulation. The rules can differ from one financial instrument to another and may sometimes be inconsistent, making the cumulative requirements confusing for retail investors. At the same time, digitalisation has led to changes in distribution models and to new forms of marketing for financial instruments towards retail clients.

The legal framework governing retail investor protection is extensive and largely harmonised at EU level. Notwithstanding this extensive body of legislation at EU level, the evidence gathering exercises have identified a number of significant shortcomings , in particular with respect to the way retail investment products are distributed and the way information is provided to retail investors.

The Commission has identified a number of problems along the retail investor's journey that hinder their ability to take full advantage of capital markets:

- retail investors have difficulties accessing relevant, comparable and easily understandable investment product information to help them make informed investment choices;

- retail investors are exposed to a growing risk of being inappropriately influenced by unrealistic marketing information through digital channels and misleading marketing practices;

- there are shortcomings in the way products are manufactured and distributed, linked to conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of the payment of inducements between product manufacturers and distributors;

- some investment products incorporate unjustifiably high levels of costs and consequently do not always offer Value for Money to the retail investor.

To address the problems on the retail investments market, further efforts are required at EU level.

On 8 October 2020, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the future development of the capital markets union, which broadly supports measures to increase retail investor participation in capital markets.

CONTENT: therefore, the proposed Omnibus amending Directive sets out the amendments to be made to the different abovementioned Directives. Overall, it aims to update the retail investor protection rules to bring greater coherence to the legislative framework whilst reinforcing investor protection rules.

Its general objectives are to strengthen the protection framework for retail investors to empower them when taking investment decisions and to ensure their fair treatment when using investment services in order to achieve better investment performance. The retail investment strategy also aims to improve the efficiency and integration of the internal market across all retail financial services.

The specific objectives of this proposal are as follows:

- improving information provided to investors and their ability to take well-informed investment decisions. The proposal aims to improve the legal framework by adapting disclosures to the digital environment, making disclosures more relevant for retail investors and ensuring retail investors receive marketing communications, also through online channels, that are relevant and not misleading. Moreover, the existing record keeping obligation to all marketing communications which are directly or indirectly made by the investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries should be extended;

- better aligning interests between intermediaries and investors . The improvements to the framework would ensure that the advice given to retail investors is not biased by monetary or non-monetary incentives provided by product manufacturers to intermediaries, is of good quality and adapted to their needs, preferences and objectives;

- ensuring that retail investors are offered cost-effective products . A strengthened approach in the legislative framework based around the value offered aims to help retail investors achieve better returns and easier access to more cost-efficient retail investment products. The proposal gives a mandate to ESMA and EIOPA to develop, make publicly available, and regularly update cost and performance benchmarks against which the manufacturers and distributors must compare their products prior to offering them on the market.

Budgetary implications

The proposal is expected to have budgetary implications as a consequence of a number of new tasks conferred to ESMA and EIOPA.

ESMA will require additional budget for operational expenditure of EUR 1.5 million for the first three years of implementation to cover IT costs and costs related to externally contracted consumer testing of new consumer-facing disclosure tools, as well as the setting up and administering of collaboration platforms and a budget of EUR 1.26 million will be required for EIOPA.

Legislative proposal

2023/05/24
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to amend certain Directives as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.

PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: investor protection rules are currently set out across sector specific legislative instruments, including the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD), the Undertaking for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), and the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance Directive (Solvency II), as well as an amending Regulation, which revises the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Regulation. The rules can differ from one financial instrument to another and may sometimes be inconsistent, making the cumulative requirements confusing for retail investors. At the same time, digitalisation has led to changes in distribution models and to new forms of marketing for financial instruments towards retail clients.

The legal framework governing retail investor protection is extensive and largely harmonised at EU level. Notwithstanding this extensive body of legislation at EU level, the evidence gathering exercises have identified a number of significant shortcomings , in particular with respect to the way retail investment products are distributed and the way information is provided to retail investors.

The Commission has identified a number of problems along the retail investor's journey that hinder their ability to take full advantage of capital markets:

- retail investors have difficulties accessing relevant, comparable and easily understandable investment product information to help them make informed investment choices;

- retail investors are exposed to a growing risk of being inappropriately influenced by unrealistic marketing information through digital channels and misleading marketing practices;

- there are shortcomings in the way products are manufactured and distributed, linked to conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of the payment of inducements between product manufacturers and distributors;

- some investment products incorporate unjustifiably high levels of costs and consequently do not always offer Value for Money to the retail investor.

To address the problems on the retail investments market, further efforts are required at EU level.

On 8 October 2020, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the future development of the capital markets union, which broadly supports measures to increase retail investor participation in capital markets.

CONTENT: therefore, the proposed Omnibus amending Directive sets out the amendments to be made to the different abovementioned Directives. Overall, it aims to update the retail investor protection rules to bring greater coherence to the legislative framework whilst reinforcing investor protection rules.

Its general objectives are to strengthen the protection framework for retail investors to empower them when taking investment decisions and to ensure their fair treatment when using investment services in order to achieve better investment performance. The retail investment strategy also aims to improve the efficiency and integration of the internal market across all retail financial services.

The specific objectives of this proposal are as follows:

- improving information provided to investors and their ability to take well-informed investment decisions. The proposal aims to improve the legal framework by adapting disclosures to the digital environment, making disclosures more relevant for retail investors and ensuring retail investors receive marketing communications, also through online channels, that are relevant and not misleading. Moreover, the existing record keeping obligation to all marketing communications which are directly or indirectly made by the investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries should be extended;

- better aligning interests between intermediaries and investors . The improvements to the framework would ensure that the advice given to retail investors is not biased by monetary or non-monetary incentives provided by product manufacturers to intermediaries, is of good quality and adapted to their needs, preferences and objectives;

- ensuring that retail investors are offered cost-effective products . A strengthened approach in the legislative framework based around the value offered aims to help retail investors achieve better returns and easier access to more cost-efficient retail investment products. The proposal gives a mandate to ESMA and EIOPA to develop, make publicly available, and regularly update cost and performance benchmarks against which the manufacturers and distributors must compare their products prior to offering them on the market.

Budgetary implications

The proposal is expected to have budgetary implications as a consequence of a number of new tasks conferred to ESMA and EIOPA.

ESMA will require additional budget for operational expenditure of EUR 1.5 million for the first three years of implementation to cover IT costs and costs related to externally contracted consumer testing of new consumer-facing disclosure tools, as well as the setting up and administering of collaboration platforms and a budget of EUR 1.26 million will be required for EIOPA.

Legislative proposal

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
1074 2023/0167(COD)
2023/11/09 ECON 1074 amendments...
source: 754.651

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: RE abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/1/rapporteur
  • name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
docs/0
date
2023-05-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
European Commission
docs/0
date
2023-05-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1
date
2023-05-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
European Commission
docs/1
date
2023-05-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2
date
2023-05-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
European Commission
docs/2
date
2023-05-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/3
date
2023-05-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
European Commission
events/0
date
2023-05-24T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2023-05-24T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/2
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
summary
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
summary
events/3/summary/20
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/5/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
New
Vote scheduled
events/6
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en
New
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=61616
events/8
date
2024-11-13T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/url
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=41380&l=en
New
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-priorities/thematic-note?id=41380
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
  • ECON/10/00224
New
ECON/10/00224
procedure/instrument/1
Amending Directive 2009/138
procedure/instrument/1
Amending Directive 2009/138 2007/0143(COD) Amending Directive 2009/65 2008/0153(COD) Amending Directive 2011/61 2009/0064(COD) Amending Directive 2014/65 2011/0298(COD) Amending Directive 2016/97 2012/0175(COD)
procedure/instrument/2
2007/0143(COD)
procedure/instrument/3
Amending Directive 2009/65
procedure/instrument/4
2008/0153(COD)
procedure/instrument/5
Amending Directive 2011/61
procedure/instrument/6
2009/0064(COD)
procedure/instrument/7
Amending Directive 2014/65
procedure/instrument/8
2011/0298(COD)
procedure/instrument/9
Amending Directive 2016/97
procedure/instrument/10
2012/0175(COD)
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2024-09-12T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe Group abbr: RE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=61616&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
opinion
False
docs/3
date
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/10/00224
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0
ECON/9/12124
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
New
Awaiting committee decision
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew, FR) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives (EU) 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2014/65/EU and (EU) 2016/97 as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Better frame the current advice environment
  • Members underlined the need to introduce rules that better frame the current advice environment by ensuring that financial intermediaries provide more transparent, understandable and tailored advice to clients and consumers. This should ensure that clients and consumers are being offered products suitable to their needs and that they better understand the advice they receive.
  • Best interest of customers
  • Member States should require that, when providing investment services or, where appropriate, ancillary services to consumers, an insurance undertaking or an insurance intermediary acts honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its consumers.
  • Financial advisors should base their advice on an appropriate range of financial products suited to the client’s or customer’s needs. The range of financial products offered should take into account the business model of the firm and the investment objectives of the client or customer. The best interest of clients and customers is broader than costs. Therefore, financial advisors should, after having identified instruments suited to their clients’ or customers’ needs , recommend the most efficient product among products offering similar features to their clients and customers, taking into consideration its performance, level of risk, qualitative elements, costs and charges reported.
  • If advisors choose to recommend an equivalent product with higher costs to the client or customer, they should provide an objective justification for such recommendation and keep the record of that justification. Financial advisors should not place the interest of their firm ahead of the interest of their clients and customers . In the case of insurance-based investment products, advisors should also ensure that the insurance cover included in the product is consistent with the client’s or customer’s insurance demands and needs. In case that none of the products is in the best interest of the client or customer, financial advisors should refrain from giving advice or making a recommendation.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of measures
  • The new rules strengthen the existing requirements on disclosure of inducements to ensure that retail investors understand the general concept of inducements, the potential for conflict of interest, as well as the impact of inducements on the overall costs and expected returns.
  • In order to assess the effectiveness of these measures, five years after the adoption of the regulatory technical standards and after having consulted the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’), the Commission should prepare a report assessing strengthened product governance requirements, the potential conflict of interests associated with inducements, the evolution of costs, the overall level of retail investment in capital markets, consumer protection, the relevance of distribution rules and the implementation of financial literacy measures. If the Commission’s assessment does not show that the new provisions have led to positive change for consumers, the Commission may propose amendments to this Directive, if necessary.
  • In addition, the Commission should be mandated to prepare a report five years after the entry into force of this Directive, after consulting ESMA and national competent authorities, to assess whether providers of financial and non-financial market data should be included in the scope of this Directive.
  • Common European benchmarks
  • Both ESMA and EIOPA should, after consulting the national competent authorities and on the basis of industry testing, develop common European benchmarks for products manufactured and distributed in more than one Member State. The benchmarks should be used solely by national competent authorities as a supervisory tool to perform the assessment of the qualitative and quantitative features of the products and to identify potential outliers on the market. As a supervisory tool, those benchmarks should not be disclosed publicly and should take into account the qualitative and quantitative features of financial instruments and insurance-based investment products.
  • If the product deviates from a relevant benchmark, national competent authorities should have the power to take the necessary corrective actions, including requiring the firm to provide a justification for such deviation, requiring the firm to correct its approach to comply with the product governance requirements and, as a last resort measure, requiring that the product be removed from the market, if necessary.
  • Finfluencers
  • Members introduced the term ‘finfluencer’ which means a natural or legal person carrying out a commercial influence activity by mobilising their popularity to communicate to the public, by electronic means and for any sort of remuneration, content aimed at promoting, directly or indirectly, financial products or contracts.
  • Investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries which make use of finfluencers to carry out their marketing communication should establish a written agreement with the finfluencers laying out the content of their contractual relationship, namely the scope and nature of the activities carried out. They should also provide the competent authority upon request with the identity and contact details of the finfluencers whose services they rely on, and should regularly operate controls over the activities carried out by the finfluencers to ensure the finfluencers’ compliance with this Directive.
  • Financial culture
  • Trust in Union financial markets is intrinsically linked to the level of participation in those markets by retail clients. Education and knowledge are tools to empower each citizen to make informed investment decisions. However, the level of financial literacy differs significantly across Member States. According to Members, the proposed Directive should lay the ground for increasing the level of financial education in each Member State. In view of the limited competences conferred upon the Union in that area, it is the responsibility of each Member State to ensure that proper adjustments are made, particularly in their education systems, to comply with this Directive.
events/6
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
events/6
date
2024-04-11T00:00:00
type
Request for a plenary vote on the Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations (Rule 71)
events/7
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71 - vote)
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-22T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
links
Research document
events/6
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
events/6
date
2024-04-11T00:00:00
type
Request for a plenary vote on the Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations (Rule 71)
events/7
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71 - vote)
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-22T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
links
Research document
events/6
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
events/6
date
2024-04-11T00:00:00
type
Request for a plenary vote on the Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations (Rule 71)
events/7
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71 - vote)
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-22T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
links
Research document
events/6
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71 - vote)
body
EP
events/6
date
2024-04-11T00:00:00
type
Request for a plenary vote on the Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations (Rule 71)
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
links
Research document
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
links
Research document
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
events/6
date
2024-04-11T00:00:00
type
Request for a plenary vote on the Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations (Rule 71)
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
events/5
date
2024-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
events/5
date
2024-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
events/5
date
2024-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
events/5
date
2024-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
events/5
date
2024-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
events/5
date
2024-04-10T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/7
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2024-0162_EN.html title: A9-0162/2024
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
events/2
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
forecasts/0
date
2024-03-20T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
forecasts/1
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/5
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755007_EN.html title: PE755.007
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-755009_EN.html title: PE755.009
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754651_EN.html title: PE754.651
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0/date
Old
2024-01-23T00:00:00
New
2024-03-20T00:00:00
docs/4/date
Old
2023-09-24T00:00:00
New
2023-09-25T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2023&nu_doc=0330
title
EUR-Lex
docs/3/date
Old
2023-10-02T00:00:00
New
2023-10-09T00:00:00
docs/4
date
2023-09-24T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0279 title: COM(2023)0279
type
Contribution
body
CZ_CHAMBER
docs/3
date
2023-10-02T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-753711_EN.html title: PE753.711
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2024-01-23T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
procedure/Legislative priorities
  • title: Joint Declaration 2023-24 url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=41380&l=en
events/1
date
2023-07-10T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • ECON/9/12124
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/0/shadows/2
name
GRUFFAT Claude
group
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
abbr
Verts/ALE
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
docs/0
date
2023-05-24T00:00:00
docs
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
events/0/summary
  • PURPOSE: to amend certain Directives as regards the Union retail investor protection rules.
  • PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
  • BACKGROUND: investor protection rules are currently set out across sector specific legislative instruments, including the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD), the Undertaking for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), and the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance Directive (Solvency II), as well as an amending Regulation, which revises the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Regulation. The rules can differ from one financial instrument to another and may sometimes be inconsistent, making the cumulative requirements confusing for retail investors. At the same time, digitalisation has led to changes in distribution models and to new forms of marketing for financial instruments towards retail clients.
  • The legal framework governing retail investor protection is extensive and largely harmonised at EU level. Notwithstanding this extensive body of legislation at EU level, the evidence gathering exercises have identified a number of significant shortcomings , in particular with respect to the way retail investment products are distributed and the way information is provided to retail investors.
  • The Commission has identified a number of problems along the retail investor's journey that hinder their ability to take full advantage of capital markets:
  • - retail investors have difficulties accessing relevant, comparable and easily understandable investment product information to help them make informed investment choices;
  • - retail investors are exposed to a growing risk of being inappropriately influenced by unrealistic marketing information through digital channels and misleading marketing practices;
  • - there are shortcomings in the way products are manufactured and distributed, linked to conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of the payment of inducements between product manufacturers and distributors;
  • - some investment products incorporate unjustifiably high levels of costs and consequently do not always offer Value for Money to the retail investor.
  • To address the problems on the retail investments market, further efforts are required at EU level.
  • On 8 October 2020, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the future development of the capital markets union, which broadly supports measures to increase retail investor participation in capital markets.
  • CONTENT: therefore, the proposed Omnibus amending Directive sets out the amendments to be made to the different abovementioned Directives. Overall, it aims to update the retail investor protection rules to bring greater coherence to the legislative framework whilst reinforcing investor protection rules.
  • Its general objectives are to strengthen the protection framework for retail investors to empower them when taking investment decisions and to ensure their fair treatment when using investment services in order to achieve better investment performance. The retail investment strategy also aims to improve the efficiency and integration of the internal market across all retail financial services.
  • The specific objectives of this proposal are as follows:
  • - improving information provided to investors and their ability to take well-informed investment decisions. The proposal aims to improve the legal framework by adapting disclosures to the digital environment, making disclosures more relevant for retail investors and ensuring retail investors receive marketing communications, also through online channels, that are relevant and not misleading. Moreover, the existing record keeping obligation to all marketing communications which are directly or indirectly made by the investment firms, insurance undertakings and insurance intermediaries should be extended;
  • - better aligning interests between intermediaries and investors . The improvements to the framework would ensure that the advice given to retail investors is not biased by monetary or non-monetary incentives provided by product manufacturers to intermediaries, is of good quality and adapted to their needs, preferences and objectives;
  • - ensuring that retail investors are offered cost-effective products . A strengthened approach in the legislative framework based around the value offered aims to help retail investors achieve better returns and easier access to more cost-efficient retail investment products. The proposal gives a mandate to ESMA and EIOPA to develop, make publicly available, and regularly update cost and performance benchmarks against which the manufacturers and distributors must compare their products prior to offering them on the market.
  • Budgetary implications
  • The proposal is expected to have budgetary implications as a consequence of a number of new tasks conferred to ESMA and EIOPA.
  • ESMA will require additional budget for operational expenditure of EUR 1.5 million for the first three years of implementation to cover IT costs and costs related to externally contracted consumer testing of new consumer-facing disclosure tools, as well as the setting up and administering of collaboration platforms and a budget of EUR 1.26 million will be required for EIOPA.
committees/0/shadows/1
name
NESCI Denis
group
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
abbr
ECR
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: YON-COURTIN Stéphanie date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/0/shadows
  • name: SEEKATZ Ralf group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP