Activities of Chris MACMANUS
Plenary speeches (82)
State of the Union (topical debate) (debate)
Conclusions of the Special European Council meeting of 1 and 2 October 2020 - Preparation of the European Council meeting of 15 and 16 October 2020 (continuation of debate)
The impact of Covid-19 outbreak on long-term care facilities (debate)
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD - Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring - Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other Regulations (debate)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 15 and 16 October 2020, in particular the negotiations of the future relations with the UK (debate)
The state of play of the EU’s COVID-19 Vaccination Strategy (debate)
Respecting the partnership principle in the preparation and implementation of national recovery and resilience plans, and ensuring good governance of the spending (debate)
Long-term vision for rural areas (debate)
General framework for securitisation and specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation to help the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis – Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards adjustments to the securitisation framework to support the economic recovery in response to the COVID-19 crisis (debate)
The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement - The outcome of EU-UK negotiations (debate)
EU strategy towards Israel-Palestine (debate)
European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (debate)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 24-25 June 2021 (debate)
Pandora Papers: implications on the efforts to combat money laundering, tax evasion and avoidance (debate)
Preparation of the European Council meeting of 21-22 October 2021 (debate)
Insurance of motor vehicles (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches (A9-0305/2021 - Evelyn Regner, Ibán García Del Blanco)
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD - Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring - Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other regulations (debate)
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference in Geneva, 30 November to 3 December 2021 (debate)
International ports’ congestions and increased transport costs affecting the EU (debate)
European framework for employees' participation rights and the revision of the European Works Council Directive (debate)
Empowering European Youth: post-pandemic employment and social recovery (debate)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: annual sustainable growth survey 2022 – European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the annual sustainable growth strategy survey 2022 (debate)
Pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology (debate)
Future of fisheries in the Channel, North Sea, Irish Sea and Atlantic Ocean (A9-0042/2022 - Manuel Pizarro)
Guidelines for the 2023 budget – Section III (A9-0062/2022 - Nicolae Ştefănuță)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Minimum level of taxation for multinational groups (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
This is Europe - Debate with the Taoiseach of Ireland, Micheál Martin (debate)
CO2 emission standards for cars and vans (A9-0150/2022 - Jan Huitema)
National vetoes to undermine the global tax deal (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
The UK government’s unilateral introduction of the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill and respect for international law (debate)
Developing an EU Cycling Strategy (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report - EU border regions: living labs of European integration (debate)
Radio Equipment Directive: common charger for electronic devices (debate)
Access to water as a human right – the external dimension (A9-0231/2022 - Miguel Urbán Crespo)
The EU’s response to the increase in energy prices in Europe (RC-B9-0416/2022, B9-0416/2022, B9-0417/2022, B9-0418/2022, B9-0419/2022, B9-0420/2022, B9-0421/2022, B9-0422/2022)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 15 December 2022 (continuation of debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
European Central Bank - annual report 2022 (debate)
Availability of fertilisers in the EU (debate)
Implementation report on the Agreement on the withdrawal of the UK from the EU - The Windsor Framework (debate)
Formal sitting - Ceremony on the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement
Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa) - Information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast) (debate)
Digital euro (debate)
Guidelines for the 2024 budget - Section III (A9-0124/2023 - Janusz Lewandowski)
EU Rapid Deployment Capacity, EU Battlegroups and Article 44 TEU: the way forward (A9-0077/2023 - Javi López)
Fighting cyberbullying of young people across the EU (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (A9-0184/2023 - Lara Wolters)
Strengthening social dialogue (B9-0259/2023)
Negotiations on the European Electoral Law (debate)
Large transport infrastructure projects in the EU (A9-0181/2023 - Andrey Novakov)
Relations with the Palestinian Authority (debate)
Nature restoration (A9-0220/2023 - César Luena)
Relations with the Palestinian Authority (A9-0226/2023 - Evin Incir)
Amending the proposed mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context (debate)
The despicable terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel, Israel’s right to defend itself in line with humanitarian and international law and the humanitarian situation in Gaza (debate)
Mental health at work (debate)
Generational renewal in the EU farms of the future (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Proposals of the European Parliament for the amendment of the Treaties (debate)
Need to release all hostages, to achieve a humanitarian ceasefire and prospect of the two-state solution (debate)
EU strategy to assist young people facing the housing and cost of living crisis (topical debate)
Gender aspects of the rising cost of living and the impact of the energy crisis (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Calling on the Council to take all necessary steps to reach an agreement on the European cross-border mechanism file and open negotiations with Parliament (debate)
Empowering farmers and rural communities - a dialogue towards sustainable and fairly rewarded EU agriculture (debate)
Commemoration of the 70th anniversary of Abbé Pierre's appeal on addressing homelessness in the context of persisting poverty and social exclusion (debate)
Instant payments in euro (A9-0230/2023 - Michiel Hoogeveen)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2023 (A9-0389/2023 - David McAllister)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Council and Commission statements - Preparation of the European Council meeting of 21 and 22 March 2024 (debate)
The immediate risk of mass starvation in Gaza and the attacks on humanitarian aid deliveries
Discharge 2022 (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Effective coordination of economic policies and multilateral budgetary surveillance - Speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure – amending Regulation - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States – amending Directive (joint debate – Economic governance)
Shadow reports (24)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the identification of taxable persons in Northern Ireland
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 laying down a general framework for securitisation and creating a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation to help the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards adjustments to the securitisation framework to support the economic recovery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
REPORT on strengthening the international role of the euro
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 as regards the Union contribution for the integrated farm statistics under the 2021-2027 financial framework
REPORT on the draft Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards rates of value added tax
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on markets in crypto-assets and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937
REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2003/17/EC as regards its period of application and as regards the equivalence of field inspections carried out in Bolivia on cereal seed-producing crops and oil and fibre plant seed-producing crops and on the equivalence of cereal seed and oil and fibre plant seed produced in Bolivia
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the adoption by Croatia of the euro on 1 January 2023
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as regards settlement discipline, cross-border provision of services, supervisory cooperation, provision of banking-type ancillary services and requirements for third-country central securities depositories
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific rules relating to the entry into Northern Ireland from other parts of the United Kingdom of certain consignments of retail goods, plants for planting, seed potatoes, machinery and certain vehicles operated for agricultural or forestry purposes, as well as non-commercial movements of certain pet animals into Northern Ireland
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of insurance and reinsurance undertakings and amending Directives 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2009/138/EC, (EU) 2017/1132 and Regulations (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/138/EC as regards proportionality, quality of supervision, reporting, long-term guarantee measures, macro-prudential tools, sustainability risks, group and cross-border supervision
REPORT on generational renewal in the EU farms of the future
REPORT European protein strategy
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules for the digital age
REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards the VAT administrative cooperation arrangements needed for the digital age
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules relating to taxable persons who facilitate distance sales of imported goods and the application of the special scheme for distance sales of goods imported from third territories or third countries and special arrangements for declaration and payment of import VAT
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1092/2010, (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010, (EU) No 1095/2010 and (EU) 2021/523 as regards certain reporting requirements in the fields of financial services and investment support
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on payment services and electronic money services in the Internal Market amending Directive 98/26/EC and repealing Directives 2015/2366/EU and 2009/110/EC
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on payment services in the internal market and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the Union, of the amendment of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of value added tax
Shadow opinions (16)
OPINION on recommendations on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
OPINION on the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan - how to finance the Green Deal
OPINION on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021
OPINION on trade-related aspects and implications of COVID-19
OPINION on tackling non-tariff and non-tax barriers in the single market
OPINION on the impact of organised crime on own resources of the EU and on the misuse of EU funds with a particular focus on shared management from an auditing and control perspective
OPINION on MFF 2021-2027: fight against oligarch structures, protection of EU funds from fraud and conflict of interest
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer credits
OPINION on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010
OPINION on economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2011/83/EU concerning financial services contracts concluded at a distance and repealing Directive 2002/65/EC
OPINION on the implementation report on the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
OPINION on harnessing talent in Europe’s regions
OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law
Institutional motions (5)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on meeting the global COVID-19 challenge: effects of the waiver of the WTO TRIPS Agreement on COVID-19 vaccines, treatment, equipment and increasing production and manufacturing capacity in developing countries
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Cuba, namely the cases of José Daniel Ferrer, Lady in White Aymara Nieto, Maykel Castillo, Luis Robles, Félix Navarro, Luis Manuel Otero, Reverend Lorenzo Fajardo, Andy Dunier García and Yunior García Aguilera
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 19 November 2021 amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union list of projects of common interest
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 9 March 2022 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 as regards economic activities in certain energy sectors and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards specific public disclosures for those economic activities
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the prospects for the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine
Oral questions (5)
The backlash against children’s rights due to COVID-19 containment measures
Breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the adopted legal changes in the Hungarian Parliament
Legal protection for rainbow families exercising free movement, in particular the Baby Sara case
How to tackle the biggest cause of death in the EU? Towards an EU Cardiovascular Health Plan
Making the fundamental right to a healthy and safe working environment a reality
Written explanations (1576)
Allocation of slots at Community airports: common rules
. – I voted in favour of this report to prevent airlines flying ‘ghost flights’ throughout the coronavirus pandemic. This report amends EU Regulation 95/931 to allows airlines to maintain their previous flight slots until October 2020 so airlines do not run ‘ghost flights’ to keep their coveted ‘use it or lose it’ slots. Flying passenger-less flights contributes unnecessary pollution to the environment. I welcome that this report now frees up the resources of Irish airlines to assist with the repatriation of Irish citizens across the world, particularly in Australia.
Specific measures to mobilise investments in the health care systems of the Member States and in other sectors of their economies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak (Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative)
. – I voted in favour of this report as the need to deliver front line resources in the battle against the pandemic outweigh other considerations. I have publicly expressed concern at how little Ireland will benefit from this funding and firmly believe that the funding available should have been distributed on the basis of need and solidarity on not simply returned to States who failed to spend cohesion funding allocations.Nevertheless. the need to deliver resources without delay and protect human life and health trumps all other considerations. For this reason I chose not to support or table any amendments as doing so would create the potential for a delay in the release of the funding.I wish to commend and thank health workers and others such as retail workers on the front line in Ireland and across the world. Solidarity and directing our resources to where the greatest need exists must underpin any other EU or domestic initiatives.Sinn Féin has proposed details measures at home and to be taken at EU level to tackle this crisis. The EU must suspend its fiscal and State Aid rules and let countries take whatever actions they see fit to protect human life and health.
Financial assistance to Member States and countries negotiating their accession to the Union that are seriously affected by a major public health emergency
. – I voted in favour of amending the rules governing access to the Solidarity Fund at it is a welcome step in fighting this pandemic. It is however a drop in the ocean compared to other measures that have been or could be taken. This is a time for radical action and simply tinkering with rules that are not fit for purpose is not enough. I rejected an amendment to end accession negotiations with Turkey as this was a purely opportunistic amendment from the far-right and had no place in this report.
Regulation amending the Multiannual financial framework 2014-2020
. – I voted in favour of this file in order to remove the limitations on the MFF global margins. Currently global margins are only allowed to be reallocated across headings for youth employment, migration and security hindering the EU’s ability to respond to the Covid-19 outbreak. This will apply for 2020 only as it is the last year of the 2014-2020 MFF. Once lifted, global margins can be reallocated to fund covid-19 response through the Emergency Support Instrument and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism.
Draft amending budget No 1/2020: Assistance to Greece in response to increased migration pressure - Immediate measures in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak - Support to post-earthquake reconstruction in Albania - Other adjustments
. – I voted in favour of this file in order to support all funding to COVID-19, post-earthquake support for Albania, and improving the living conditions of refugees in Greece.However, I oppose the Commission’s inclusion of security funding in the same file that deals with emergency response and humanitarian aid. It is a cynical use of an emergency to push through a security agenda that will not benefit EU citizens or those seeking refuge in EU countries. It is particularly disappointing to see that the 350 million earmarked for migration will not be used to protect refugees from any potential outbreak of COVID-19 in refugee camps.Despite these significant concerns I felt compelled to support the file due to the positive elements and the need for urgent funding the COVID-19 response and humanitarian aid.
Draft amending budget No 2/2020: Providing emergency support to Member States and further reinforcement of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism/rescEU to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak
. – I voted in favour of this file in order to allow the use of the flexibility instrument to finance the provision of emergency support within through the Emergency Support Instrument, which is proposed to be re-activated to help tackle the consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak and to further reinforce the Union Civil Protection Mechanism/rescEU to enable wider stockpiling and coordination of essential resource distribution across Europe.
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for 2020: migration, refugee inflows and security threats; immediate measures in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak; reinforcement of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (C9-0092/2020)
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument for 2020: migration, refugee inflows and security threats; immediate measures in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak; reinforcement of the European Public Prosecutor's Office (C9-0096/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this file in order to allow the use of the flexibility instrument to mobilise emergency financial support through the Emergency Support Instrument, which is proposed to be re-activated to help tackle the consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak and to further reinforce the Union Civil Protection Mechanism/rescEU to allow wider stock-piling and coordination of essential resource distribution across Europe.
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2020: providing emergency assistance to Member States and further reinforcing the Union Civil Protection Mechanism/rescEU in response to the COVID-19 outbreak
Specific measures to provide exceptional flexibility for the use of the European Structural and Investments Funds in response to the COVID-19 outbreak
. – I voted in favour of this report. I was happy to support this initiative to allow greater flexibility for Member States in the use of their Structural Fund allocations.Although the effect of this legislation is unlikely to be of great significance to Ireland it may be useful for other countries facing this pandemic. Solidarity will be key to saving lives.The legislation allows greater flexibility for countries to use the Structural Funds, by moving it between funds or between regions and allows the EU to pay 100% of funds instead of the usual situation where the State has to pay half of the funding.This initiative is welcome but does not provide any new money for the front-line battle against COVID-19. The EU response must be sharper and built on solidarity which goes beyond outdated rules and failed ideological positions.
Introduction of specific measures for addressing the COVID-19 crisis
. – I voted in favour of this proposal. The Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) supports EU countries’ actions to provide food and/or basic material assistance to the most deprived, which are distributed by partner organisations.The amending Regulation proposes a number of measures that make the FEAD operate more flexibly during the current crisis. These measures include extending the deadline for reporting for the year 2020, greater flexibility with regards to eligible costs, and allowing 100 % co-financing from the EU Budget. For those reasons, I voted in favour.
Specific measures to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in the fishery and aquaculture sector
. – I voted in favour of this file in order to support fishermen and aquaculture farmers for the temporary cessation of fishing and farming activities caused by the COVID-19 outbreak. Furthermore, the file aims to support producer organisations and associations of producer organisations for the storage of fishery and aquaculture products, in accordance with the Common Market Organisation. I believe it is vitally important that all measures are taken to support fishermen and coastal communities through the COVID-19 outbreak.
Medical devices (C9-0098/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this report to postpone the date for application of EU Regulation (EU) 2017/745 covering medical devices. It amends the report to allow the legislation to come into force next year, in May 2021. Due to the pressure on the medical industry at this time, it would be unwise for the legislation, introducing new requirements, to begin in May 2020 and I therefore welcome the postponement. It is important to ensure that there is no slow-down on the production of life-saving equipment caused by Regulation 2017/745.
EU coordinated action to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences
. – I abstained on this resolution. The common resolution by the major political groups was disappointing, although I recognise it was a genuine attempt to make an effort to help fight the pandemic.I am in full agreement with its message of solidarity towards all front line workers and with its contents regarding common sense cooperation among States to tackle this crisis.There are many things missing from it, including a commitment to end sanctions on affected third countries.The last thing these essential public services need is more interference from this right-wing Commission.Sinn Féin does not agree with the use of the so-called ‘Passarelle’ clause, which would allow the EU to increase its powers, possibly bypassing the usual democratic safeguard in Ireland of a referendum.The economic plans on the document contain some positives but fall far short on the need for coronabonds and for debt cancellation and management. The people were forced to pay for the banking crisis this resolution gives no comfort that they won't end up having to pay for this one as well. That can’t be allowed to happen.
EU-Montenegro status agreement on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Montenegro (A9-0018/2020 - Bettina Vollath)
. – I voted against giving consent to this Status Agreement between the EU and Montenegro.The European Border and Coast Guard Agency foresees a number of possibilities for co-operation with third countries. The concept of a status agreement is to provide a legally binding framework for the operations of the Agency where team members with executive powers would be deployed to the territory of the third country. Sinn Féin oppose the restrictive border controls, as it is part of the instruments for imposing the policies of Fortress-Europe and impedes vulnerable people safely reaching the EU.
EU-Serbia status agreement on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Serbia (A9-0019/2020 - Bettina Vollath)
. – I voted against the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Status Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Serbia on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia.The European Border and Coast Guard Agency foresees a number of possibilities for co-operation with third countries. The concept of a status agreement is to provide a legally binding framework for the operations of the Agency where team members with executive powers would be deployed to the territory of the third country. Sinn Féin oppose the restrictive border controls, as it is part of the instruments for imposing the policies of Fortress-Europe and impedes vulnerable people safely reaching the EU.
Renewal of the EU-India Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation (A9-0096/2020 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
. – I voted in favour of the renewal of the Agreement between the EU and India for scientific and technological cooperation. The Agreement entered into force in 2002. It comes up for renewal every five years, and expired in May 2020. The renewal of the agreement does not change any content of the agreement.
Renewal of the EU-Ukraine Agreement on cooperation in science and technology (A9-0095/2020 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
. – This file deals with the renewal of the Agreement between the EU and Ukraine for scientific and technological cooperation. The Agreement entered into force in 2002. It comes up for renewal every five years and expired in November 2019. The renewal of the agreement does not change any content of the agreement.
EU-Belarus Agreement on readmission of persons residing without authorisation (A9-0097/2020 - Petar Vitanov)
. – This agreement allows Belarus to readmit their own nationals who are staying irregularly in the EU as well as third country nationals who have stayed on, or transited through, the territory of Belarus. However, I voted against the agreement as it states that citizens of third countries who travelled through Belarus into the EU can be deported back to Belarus. We oppose agreements that would see persons deported to countries they are not citizens of.
EU-Belarus Agreement on facilitation of issuance of visas (A9-0090/2020 - Ondřej Kovařík)
. – I voted in favour of this agreement.The agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus on the facilitation of the issuance of visas aims to facilitate, on the basis of reciprocity, the issuance of visas to citizens of the European Union and Belarus for an intended stay of no more than 90 days in any 180-day period. The provisions constitute a development of the Schengen acquis and do not apply to Great Britain, Ireland and Denmark.The visa facilitation agreement tends to facilitate getting a Schengen visa to Europe for Belarussians, and reduces the fee to obtain one to EUR 35. ‘Reciprocal’ procedures had already been put in place in Belarus for Europeans.Moreover, the service fee will be limited in scope, and the Schengen consulates will be obliged to take a decision on visa applicants within shorter periods. Several categories of travellers from Belarus, in particular journalists, students and members of official delegations will be able to receive multiple-entry visas with increasingly longer validity, while having to submit fewer supporting documents to prove their purpose of travel.
Amending the International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) - Protocol (A9-0089/2020 - Rosanna Conte)
EC-Mauritania Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution. Extension of the Protocol (A9-0088/2020 - Clara Aguilera)
. – I voted against the extension of the protocol for a Fisheries Partnership Agreement with the Islamic Republic of Mauritania because the money allocated under the agreement to the local fisheries sector is the bare minimum, showing that the main aim in this agreement is to grant access to large external fisheries operators at the expense of the developing country in question.The EU’s fisheries agreements with West African states have long been criticised by NGOs for exporting the EU’s problem of over-exploiting its own fish stocks to African waters. Fish stocks in the African states’ waters are still being over-fished to serve the needs of the EU, not the African states.
A safety net to protect the beneficiaries of EU programmes: setting up an MFF contingency plan (A9-0099/2020 - Jan Olbrycht, Margarida Marques)
. – I voted in favour of this file which calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for reoriented, emergency-MFF contingency plan. Sinn Fein opposed the original proposal from the Commission for the 2021-2027 and welcome the opportunity to change the existing proposal. The outbreak of Covid-19 makes it even more necessary that we protect socially beneficial programmes from any proposed cuts.
International road passenger transport services by coach and bus in the border regions: cabotage operations between Germany and Switzerland (A9-0006/2020 - Markus Ferber)
International road passenger transport services by coach and bus in the border regions: cabotage operations between Italy and Switzerland (A9-0007/2020 - Markus Ferber)
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in the United Kingdom (A9-0100/2020 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
. – I voted against allowing the British government full access to fingerprint databases of other EU Member States while not providing full access to their own database. The British government haven’t followed EU protection rules while being an EU member, and cannot expect special treatment as a departing member.
Genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547-127 (B9-0121/2020)
. – I voted in favour of the objection as this authorisation represents yet another variety of GM soybeans potentially being imported into the EU market. These soybeans are resistant to three herbicides: glyphosate, dicamba and glufosinate. Glufosinate is classified as toxic to reproduction. It has not been authorised for use in the EU since 1 August 2018. This gives imports an unfair competitive advantage against soybeans produced in the EU. Furthermore, GM soybeans, when cultivated in countries such as Brazil and Argentina, are a key driver of large-scale deforestation.
Discharge 2018: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (A9-0042/2020 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
. – I voted in favour of the discharge and resolution. The EIOPA is the one of the three main supervisors of the European System of Financial Supervision, along with the EBA and ESMA. There are some deficiencies with the agency’s work in financial supervision but this is often due to a lack of resources and a failure by Member States to cooperate with it. There have been no irregularities reported therefore I voted in favour.
Discharge 2018: European Asylum Support Office (A9-0077/2020 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
. – I voted in favour of this discharge and resolution despite Sinn Féin having in the past voted to refuse to grant this discharge. This was due to irregularities discovered by OLAF regarding breach of procurement procedures, misappropriation of EU funds, mismanagement, abuse of position in human resources issues, and breaches of data protection rules. However, since then, corrective measures have been put in place to improve governance, restore transparency and rebuild trust. 2018 represents the first year since improvements were made, and therefore I voted in favour.
Discharge 2018: EU general budget - European Parliament (A9-0021/2020 - Maria Grapini)
. – I voted in favour of this discharge as there were no irregularities or issues with reporting that would warrant blocking discharge for 2018. I abstained on the resolution, though I support its criticism of current levels of transparency, lack of protection for whistle-blowers, and top—heavy management structures.
Discharge 2018: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A9-0038/2020 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
. – I voted in favour of the postponement of the discharge because the European Council continues to refuse to engage with Parliament in the discharge procedure. This procedure is essential in order to maintain transparency and democratic accountability. I voted in favour of the resolution as it accurately reported the ongoing situation.
Discharge 2018: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (A9-0040/2020 - Joachim Stanisław Brudziński)
. – CEDEFOP supports development of European vocational education and training (VET) policies and contributes to their implementation.I voted in favour of the discharge as there were no special irregularities which would justify a postponement.I voted against the resolution. The resolution calls on the Commission to evaluate the possible merger of EUROFOUND with CEDEFOP and the potential transfer of the Centre to the Eurofound Headquarters in Loughlinstown, Ireland to the CEDEFOP Thessaloniki Headquarters; this would result in the sharing of corporate and support services and the common management of premises.I oppose any possible removal of Eurofound HQ from Ireland and therefore I voted against the resolution.
Discharge 2018: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A9-0043/2020 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
. – I voted in favour of the discharge as there was no irregularities. I voted against the accompanying resolution as it goes beyond commenting on the organisation performance of the EEAS and makes the political claims there is a need for the EU to play a leading role in international relations. Sinn Fein oppose the ever-increasing role of the external action because it undermines Member States’ ability to maintain sovereignty over foreign affairs. Furthermore, the resolution explicitly supports the militarisation of the EU by stating ‘to provide necessary resources for a successful implementation of an efficient EU Common Security and Defence Policy’.
Discharge 2018: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (A9-0049/2020 - Ryszard Antoni Legutko)
Discharge 2018: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (A9-0051/2020 - Joachim Stanisław Brudziński)
. – EUROFOUND or the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions is an agency of the European Union which focuses on managing research, gathering information, and communicating its findings.I voted in favour of the discharge as there were no special irregularities which would justify a postponement.I voted against the resolution calls on the Commission to evaluate the possible merger of EUROFOUND with CEDEFOP and the potential transfer of the Centre to the Eurofound Headquarters in Loughlinstown, Ireland to the CEDEFOP Thessaloniki Headquarters; this would result in the sharing of corporate and support services and the common management of premises.I oppose any possible removal of Eurofound HQ from Ireland and therefore I voted against the resolution.
Discharge 2018: European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) (A9-0053/2020 - Ryszard Antoni Legutko)
Discharge 2018: Euratom Supply Agency (A9-0056/2020 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
Discharge 2018: eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds (A9-0057/2020 - Michèle Rivasi)
Discharge 2018: European Securities and Markets Authority (A9-0059/2020 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
. – I voted in favour of the discharge and resolution. The ESMA is the one of the three main supervisors of the European System of Financial Supervision, along with the EBA and EIOPA. There are some deficiencies with the agency’s work in financial supervision but this is often due to a lack of resources and a failure by Member States to cooperate with it. There have been no irregularities reported
Discharge 2018: European Banking Authority (A9-0060/2020 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
. – The EBA is the one of the three main supervisors of the European System of Financial Supervision, along with the EIOPA and ESMA. There are some deficiencies with the agency’s work in financial supervision but this is often due to a lack of resources and a failure by Member States to cooperate with it. There have been no irregularities reported.However, I voted against the discharge due to on the ongoing problem of ‘revolving doors/Conflict of interest’ in the agency as highlighted by the appointment of the EBA Executive Director as AFME (Banking lobby) Chief Executive as from 1 February. I voted in favour of the accompanying resolution as it rightly raises these issues.
Discharge 2018: EU general budget – Commission and executive agencies (A9-0069/2020 - Monika Hohlmeier)
. – The error-rate as audited and reported on by the ECA is declining year-on-year, a welcome development. However, I voted against the discharge as the problem of the dual audit report still exists, as does the problem of an overly-high error-rate, and the problem of the incorrect application of the error-rate correction.I voted against the accompanying resolution as it contains thinly vailed attacks on the work of UNWRA and endangers future funding for the organisation. Despite a number of amendments being tabled to remove these harmful sections they were not successful in plenary. Therefore in solidarity with the Palestinian people and the in support of the work of UNWRA I voted against the resolution.
Discharge 2018: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (A9-0072/2020 - Joachim Stanisław Brudziński)
. – I voted against the discharge and the accompanying resolution. In 2018, FRONTEX managed financing agreements with cooperating countries for operational activities representing 59% of the Agency’s budget. The Court has consistently reported since 2014 that proof of equipment-related cost claimed by cooperating countries is often insufficient, which was again confirmed by this year’s audit results. FRONTEX’s ex ante verifications of these costs are ineffective as long as reimbursements of costs which are not substantiated by supporting documents are continued. In addition, as in the previous years, FRONTEX did not carry out any ex post verifications, further increasing the risk of unjustified cost reimbursements. For these reasons I voted against the discharge. I voted against the resolution as it was not sufficiently critical of Frontex operations.
Discharge 2018: General budget of the EU – European Economic and Social Committee (A9-0078/2020 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
. – I voted in favour of not granting the discharge as the despite the administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error, on the grounds that an OLAF report on harassment cases involving the president of the Employer’s Group (Group I) who, in line with the rotation system, is to become the next President of the EESC.
Temporary measures concerning the general meetings of European companies (SE) and of European Cooperative Societies (SCE)
. – I voted against this proposal as the technology exists for to allow European companies to hold general shareholding meetings before 30 June, and we shouldn’t allow companies that might be so inclined to escape public scrutiny. A delay in holding shareholders meetings may be used by some to escape their responsibilities to workers during the Covid crisis in order to ensure the payment of dividends to shareholders later in the year.
Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2021 (A9-0102/2020 - Olivier Chastel)
. – I voted against the report on Parliament’s budget for 2020 because it is not sufficiently critical of overall increase in the proposed budget. There is progress in terms of reducing the budget as a percentage of Heading V, but the overall expenditure continues to raise. The main cause of the expenditure increase is the result of two thirds of the expenditures in the budget estimates being index-bound and therefore adjusted according to staff regulations, statue for members, sector specific indexation or inflation. Report fails to criticize the role high wages in driving up costs and highlight the burden they place on the budget of the parliament.
New MFF, own resources and Recovery plan
. – I voted against this resolution for a number of reasons. While I acknowledge the positive points around protecting CAP I believe this won’t be possible if the resolution’s approach of combining the recovery fund and the MFF is followed. The EU governments and Parliament have failed the peoples of Europe by delegating responsibility to the Commission.The resolution failed to challenge a plan which is a bureaucrat-led muddle with the EU’s seven-year budget now inseparable from the Recovery Fund. This means CAP and other social spending is now in the same pot as the Recovery Fund. It is hard to imagine a worse outcome for workers, farmers and small businesses in Ireland and across Europe. The EU Parliament, which is supposed to represent the people, today passed a motion that mainly focused on increasing EU taxes as an ideological fixation. This hijacking of the momentum towards solidarity to simply play out old EU internal battles does not serve people across Europe well.I reject the resolution’s call for more EU taxes to fund the EU.
Macro-financial assistance to enlargement and neighbourhood partners in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic crisis
. – I am in favour of providing financial support to neighbourhood countries that are in extreme financial stress and in urgent need of financial support to deal with the economic consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the assistance comes with conditions which are at best not helpful and often damaging to the countries concerned. Therefore I abstained on this vote.
Temporary measures concerning the operation of air services
. – I voted in favour of this proposal to bring in relief measures for the aviation sector, for air-carriers and ground-handling services which are suffering financially. The amendments of a temporary nature would allow Member States to have more flexibility in granting, revoking or extending licences for air carriers and ground-handling services. As many air operators’ liquidity is diminishing, resulting in a potential loss of their licence, this report gives airlines continued validity of their operating licence and gives additional time for their finances to recover. However, I was disappointed that the rights of workers were not strongly included in the text, and voted in favour of amendments to prioritise this.
Temporary measures concerning the validity of certificates and licences (omnibus)
. – I voted in favour of this report to extend the validity of licences and certifications in the transport sector, such as driving licences, NCTs, CPC licences and certificates for haulage companies. It extends all these licences and certifications for a period of seven months, if they expire between 1 February 2020 and 31 August 2020. I welcome this legislation and urge the Irish Government to implement in order to give road users a necessary break.
Port infrastructure charges
. – I voted against this legislation. This report allows port authorities to waive, suspend, reduce or defer the payment of port charges for shipping operators between March 2020 and December 2020. This proposal will create the expectation that ports will reduce or waive charges, which may not be possible for smaller ports. Ireland’s ports are small in comparison to European ports and are often much smaller companies than the shipping companies utilising the ports. This could jeopardise the level playing field of the European port system and lead to a race to the bottom. Ports which have been badly hit by the COVID-19 crisis should not be sacrificed in order to solve the liquidity issue of shipping companies, as both are important in maritime transport.
4th railway package: extension of the transposition periods
. – I voted in favour of this proposal to postpone the application of the 4th Railway Package for another three months. Due to COVID-19 Member States have not been able to take the necessary legislative changes needed to adhere to the demands of the 4th Railway Package. The 4th Railway Package is also an instrument to liberalise the railway sector and I oppose the package as a whole.
Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Cape Verde (2019-2024) (A9-0024/2020 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
. – I voted in favour of the new protocol as a tool for development for the country, with compensation for the exploitation of its resources. It will also help to create opportunities for the country to become more self-sufficient, to sustain its development strategy and to guarantee its sovereignty.
Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Cape Verde (2019-2024) (Resolution) (A9-0023/2020 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
. – I voted in favour of the new protocol as a tool for development for the country, with compensation for the exploitation of its resources. It will also help to create opportunities for the country to become more self-sufficient, to sustain its development strategy and to guarantee its sovereignty.
Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and Guinea-Bissau (2019-2024) (A9-0012/2020 - João Ferreira)
. – I voted in favour of the renewal of the proposal. The proposal is to vote in favour of the agreement, as a tool for development for the country with compensation for the exploitation of its resources. It will also help to create opportunities for the country to become more self-sufficient, to sustain its development strategy and to guarantee its sovereignty. Contacts were held with the Guinea-Bissau authorities, which confirmed the ambition to proceed with this protocol in the interest of the country’s development policies.
Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and Guinea-Bissau (2019-2024) (Resolution) (A9-0013/2020 - João Ferreira)
. – I voted in favour of the renewal of the proposal. The proposal is to vote in favour of the agreement, as a tool for development for the country with compensation for the exploitation of its resources. It will also help to create opportunities for the country to become more self-sufficient, to sustain its development strategy and to guarantee its sovereignty. Contacts were held with the Guiné-Bissau authorities, which confirmed the ambition to proceed with this protocol in the interest of the country’s development policies.
Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between São Tomé and Príncipe and the European Community (A9-0001/2020 - Nuno Melo)
. – I voted in favour of the renewal of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe and the European Community. While these protocols can be exploitative in some instances, in this case, São Tomé and Príncipe depends on external aid in order to develop its fisheries. A partnership with the EU is important for the country to improve its fisheries management and the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
EU-Swiss Confederation Agreement on the modification of Switzerland’s WTO concessions (Article XXVIII of the GATT 1994) with regard to seasoned meat (A9-0092/2020 - Jörgen Warborn)
Request for funding for biomedical research on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (B9-0186/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution, which came after several petitions lodged to the PETI Committee concerning Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome where petitioners complained about lack of EU financing for biomedical research into these kinds of rare diseases and the lack of social recognition (including stigmatisation).The report called for more sharing of best practices and the need for an increased awareness in order to tackle any stigmatisation of ME/CFS.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A9-0109/2020 - Victor Negrescu)
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Portugal, Spain, Italy and Austria (A9-0105/2020 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Draft amending budget No 3/2020: Entering the surplus of the financial year 2019 (A9-0104/2020 - Monika Hohlmeier)
. – I voted in favour of the Draft amending budget No 3/2020 which allows for the surplus from the 2019 financial year, amounting to EUR 3 218.4 million to be entered into the 2020 budget to be used to deploy financial assistance to the regions and businesses most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the inclusion of the 2019 surplus in the 2020 budget implies reductions in the Member States GNI contributions.
Draft amending budget No 4/2020: proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Portugal, Spain, Italy and Austria (A9-0106/2020 - Monika Hohlmeier)
Amendment of the EU-Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (accession of Bulgaria and Romania) (A9-0005/2020 - Sven Schulze)
. – I voted against this report to allow Bulgaria and Romania to accede to the EU-Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement. I oppose the EU-Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement as the agreement places the air space of the Western Sahara, a disputed territory, within the air space of the Kingdom of Morocco. This contradicts the EU Court of Justice ruling that states that the Western Sahara must be considered a territory separate from the Kingdom of Morocco in all EU law.
Conclusion of the EU-Israel Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (A9-0085/2020 - Andor Deli)
Recommendations on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (A9-0117/2020 - Kati Piri, Christophe Hansen)
. – I voted in favour of this report. With the British government acting in bad faith with regard to negotiations on the future relationship as well as on the implementation of the Irish Protocol in the Withdrawal Agreement, it is more important than ever for the EU to be very firm. The Irish Protocol is legally binding. The British government cannot be allowed to backslide on its implementation.Any future agreement also needs to be binding and enforceable, and needs to cover those issues that are not dealt with in the Irish protocol, such as free movement of services and of EU nationals on the island of Ireland.Despite voting in favour of the report, I showed my opposition the militarisation of the EU in separate votes and amendments on security and defence issues.
EU disability strategy post 2020 (B9-0123/2020)
. – The Commission’s European Disability Strategy 2010-2020 will run out this year and needs to be updated. I voted in favour of the European Disability Strategy, which mainly deals with the implementation of the UN Convention for persons with disabilities within the EU and highlights the Optional Protocol. As Sinn Féin believes the Irish Government should ratify the Optional Protocol, I voted in favour.
Amending Regulations (EU) No 575/2013 and (EU) 2019/876 as regards adjustments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (A9-0113/2020 - Jonás Fernández)
. – I voted against this report.This vote was to allow banks across the EU a break from strict regulations. It is a blank cheque because of rejected amendments around issues of bonuses and dividends. COVID-19 crisis cannot allow regression of hard won regulation of the financial sector.This was a missed opportunity to impose conditionality on banks benefiting on a loosening of the regulatory environment. Sinn Féin backed amendments sought to impose a ban in bonuses and dividends on banks as workers and businesses struggle through the COVID crisis. Instead, the Parliament has written them a blank cheque.The proposals allow for the waiving and loosening of technical rules that were designed to regulate banks and keep them from destroying the economy again. In short, they will now be allowed be less prudent in their actions and accounts.There is of course some logic in some easing of regulation as banks must play a role in forbearance and lending to help society weather this storm but to simply allow them additional scope without conditions shows many in Europe have not learned the lessons of the past.
Competition policy - annual report 2019 (A9-0022/2020 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin)
. – I abstained on this report.This is an annual report the EP does each year looking at Competition Policy.The report is very broad ranging so there are many good points and bad points.In terms of a general overview the biggest problem is that the Report doesn’t challenge the EU Framework of ‘competition good, State investment bad’ and that it is strongly calling for anybody trading with the EU to adopt EU rules ( i.e. open up their markets) to ensure ‘fairness’.The strongest part of the report is the focus on the likes of Facebook and Google and how they dominate data so much.Then there are issues around tax sovereignty being attacked as unfair which in principle we don’t accept but we can’t stand over unfair tax practices either.The Report recognisees the suspension of certain State Aid rules because of COVID as a necessary course of action. I contend that Ireland could and should be making far greater use of this flexibility.
Setting up a subcommittee on tax matters (B9-0187/2020)
. – I was happy to support the setting up of a subcommittee on tax matters. My predecessor Matt Carthy sat on this Committee in the previous term making a valuable contribution.I defend Ireland’s right to manage its own tax affairs but as a small country in a global economy we must cooperate to ensure fairness not least to the developing world.
Setting up a special committee on beating cancer, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B9-0188/2020)
Setting up a special committee on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B9-0190/2020)
. – I abstained on this report. The proposal is to give the special committee a broad mandate to analyse and identify action (legislative and otherwise) related to foreign interferences on democratic processes.Whilst we recognise the risks of disinformation and ‘fake news’, I believe this is a multi-faceted issue that would deserve serious critical reflection and debate. I believe there were some positive aspects in this report, including the potential to request social media platforms label content shared by ‘bots’, reviewing algorithms in order to make them as transparent as possible.
Setting up a special committee on artificial intelligence in a digital age, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B9-0189/2020)
The reopening of the investigation against the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic on the misuse of EU funds and potential conflicts of interest (B9-0192/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution welcoming the reopening of investigations against the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic on the misuse of EU funds and potential conflicts of interest. It is crucial that we have more stringent controls on conflicts of interest and greater budgetary transparency. For these reasons I voted in favour.
Banking Union - annual report 2019 (A9-0026/2020 - Pedro Marques)
. – I abstained on this vote.This year’s report on Banking Union is a relatively good report so I abstained on final vote given my concerns about how Banking Union has failed to separate banking and sovereign debt.The biggest problem is the call for completion of the Capital Markets Union which Sinn Féin is opposed to. There is also a new theme emerging backed by the Commission of talking about the "international role" of the Euro as they try to rival the dollar. I was uncomfortable with some of the language on this issue.On the plus side there is a recognition that the "too big to fail" problem still remains. This is an important thing to have included having been ignored in previous Banking Union reports. The report is weakened though by the contradictory position of seeking more, larger cross-border banks.
Guidelines for the 2021 Budget - Section III (A9-0110/2020 - Pierre Larrouturou)
. – I voted against the guidelines for the 2021 budget because it made a call for increased military spending at a time when we can least afford it.A positive part is the document's emphasis on the need for next year's EU budget to primarily focus on mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and supporting Member States' recovery. However, the sincerity of this was undercut by calling for more funding for military spending which would mean less resources for COVID-19 response and recovery.Under current plans a European Defence Fund will be introduced in the 2021 budget for the first time. This will mean billions being spent as subsidies to the arms industry.
Eastern Partnership in the run-up to the June 2020 Summit (A9-0112/2020 - Petras Auštrevičius)
Western Balkans, following the 2020 summit (A9-0091/2020 - Tonino Picula)
. – I voted in favour of this report which was related to the 2020 EU-Western Balkans summit.Sinn Féin supports the accession of the Western Balkans as long as this is the will of the people and as long as Convention obligations have been met including the reform of electoral laws and adherence to democratic principles and human rights.
Tourism and transport in 2020 and beyond (RC-B9-0166/2020, B9-0166/2020, B9-0175/2020, B9-0177/2020, B9-0178/2020, B9-0180/2020, B9-0182/2020, B9-0184/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution. The resolution highlights the need for a coordinated EU approach for opening up transport and tourism as we ease out of confinement measures. The resolution calls for the establishment of mechanisms of scientific criteria for lifting or introducing travel restrictions. I support this report, which also calls for support for the tourism sector.
Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation: deferring certain time limits due to the COVID-19 pandemic (C9-0134/2020)
. – I voted against this proposal. It allows companies to relax their tax reporting obligations owing to COVID-19. I believe this is a move in response to corporate lobbying and not in the public interest. The Commission has brought forward many relaxations of regulations due to COVID-19 which are not in the public interest and open to exploitation.
Exceptional temporary support under EAFRD in response to the COVID-19 outbreak (amendment of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013) (C9-0128/2020 - Norbert Lins)
European citizens’ initiative: temporary measures concerning the time limits for the collection, verification and examination stages in view of the COVID-19 outbreak (C9-0142/2020 - Loránt Vincze)
The Anti-racism protests following the death of George Floyd (B9-0194/2020, B9-0195/2020, B9-0196/2020, B9-0197/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution. The resolution condemns the killing of George Floyd and condemns all forms of racism, hate and violence. The resolution supports the anti-racism protests that have occurred across Europe. I believe that the fight against racism should be taken into account in all EU policies. There is a need for EU frameworks and taskforces to tackle racism, and to ensure collection of data on racism in the EU. I also welcome that this resolution recognises the EU’s role in the transatlantic slave trade and calls for education on colonialism.
The PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy (RC-B9-0169/2020, B9-0169/2020, B9-0171/2020, B9-0173/2020, B9-0174/2020, B9-0176/2020, B9-0181/2020, B9-0193/2020)
. – I abstained on this resolution, as the resolution did not manage to strike a balance between recognising China’s sovereignty and raising valid concerns. As a club with many former colonial powers as members, the EU should not feel it has any greater moral authority than anybody else when discussing colonial legacy issues.
Situation in the Schengen area following the Covid-19 outbreak (B9-0165/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this report, which points to the bad management of border closures by different Member States (including lack of notice, poor information and lack of hygiene facilities at border posts), while recognising the right of Member States to close their borders on public health grounds.
European protection of cross-border and seasonal workers in the context of the COVID-19 crisis (B9-0172/2020)
. – I voted in favour because the document calls for greater protection for cross-border workers. This includes decent housing, working conditions, health and safety, social distancing, social security protection and coordination, access to healthcare, and the provision of information in a language they can understand. It highlights poor working conditions in the agricultural sector as one of the reasons for labour shortages. For these reasons, I voted in favour.
Amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards the resources for the specific allocation for the Youth Employment Initiative (A9-0111/2020 - Younous Omarjee)
. – I voted in favour of this report to give additional funding to the Youth Unemployment Initiative. The Youth Employment Initiative provides support to young people living in regions where youth unemployment was higher than 25 %. It funds the provision of apprenticeships, traineeships, job placements and further education courses leading to a qualification.
Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2454 as regards the dates of application due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis (A9-0123/2020 - Luděk Niedermayer)
. – I voted against this report as although many businesses are under pressure due to COVID-19 regulations and rules to prevent fraud and to ensure fairness must not be thrown out.VAT fraud and inefficiencies cost billions each year that could be paying for our public services including our health services. On balance I do not believe a six-month delay is justified.
International and domestic parental abduction of EU children in Japan (B9-0205/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this motion for resolution which highlights the issue of when Japanese partners return to their country with their children, not allowing the European former partner to see them. The motion recognizes that the number of cases is important, and that both EU and Japan have signed international conventions on children rights, that must be respected. The motion invites Japanese and EU authorities to collaborate in order to solve situations such as this.
The rights of persons with intellectual disabilities in the COVID-19 crisis (B9-0204/2020)
. – The motion comes from a petition dealt with urgently in the frame of the COVID—19 crisis. The motion underlines how persons with intellectual disabilities and mental illnesses are affected in the COVID—19 crisis and reminds us that this is just one facet of the unfair treatment faced by these communities as a whole.I voted in favour of this resolution which highlighted that everyone has the right to independent living and to be informed immediately and correctly, in an accessible format, about the pandemic and the measures affecting them and their family; demands that all public health communications be accessible to persons with disabilities and be provided in plain language, in a variety of traditional and digital formats, and in their national sign-languages.
Ειδικοί κανόνες για την απόσπαση οδηγών στον τομέα των οδικών μεταφορών και απαιτήσεις επιβολής (A9-0114/2020 - Kateřina Konečná) (A9-0114/2020 - Kateřina Konečná)
. – I supported the agreement reached at Council level. The file deals with rules for the posting of drivers in international road haulage. I welcome that the current deal allows for some exemptions, such as posting not applying to transit and bilateral operations, which will ease the administrative burden on Irish hauliers who have the second highest minimum wage in the EU.
Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs (A9-0115/2020 - Henna Virkkunen)
. – I supported the agreement reached at Council level. This file deals with driving and rest times, and where drivers can take their rest. I welcome the drivers’ ability to choose where to take their rest, and the flexibility to take rest in the cabin, provided it is in a safe and secure parking area.
Adapting to development in the road transport sector (A9-0116/2020 - Ismail Ertug)
. – I supported the agreement reached at Council level. This file deals with cabotage operations. I welcome that the Council agreement maintains the current provision of three cabotage operations within seven days within a host Member State. However, I am disappointed at the inclusion of a four-day cooling off period in the report. This is unfair on peripheral hauliers who drive for longer periods of time and are more likely to carry out cabotage operations on their journeys.
European citizens’ initiative: temporary measures concerning the time limits for the collection, verification and examination stages in view of the COVID-19 outbreak (C9-0142/2020 - Loránt Vincze)
Amending Directives (EU) 2017/2455 and (EU) 2019/1995 as regards the dates of transposition and application due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis (A9-0122/2020 - Ondřej Kovařík)
Financial activities of the European Investment Bank - annual report 2019 (A9-0081/2020 - David Cormand)
. – I was happy to support this report, which looked at the financial activities of the EIB in 2019. The EIB is a positive force allowing investment in Ireland and across Europe. I strongly believe there is greater potential for its use in delivering infrastructure in Ireland, especially in the West. In particular, I support the report’s focus on SME funding, climate goals and gender equality in the organisation.
Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank - annual report 2018 (A9-0118/2020 - Bas Eickhout)
. – I supported this report on the financial activities of the EIB in 2018. I welcome in particular the focus on transparency and climate lending policy. Other strong points included the need to constantly keep a cognisance of the EIB’s external operations with the objective of the EU’s external policy, adopting a comprehensive Human Right strategy; the request for the EIB to review the Code of Conduct of the Management Committee and the Board of Directors and the need to step up the fight against fraud and corruption, through among others the need for an adequate eternal scrutiny on its activities, including by OLAF.
Protection of the European Union's financial interests - combating fraud - annual report 2018 (A9-0103/2020 - Joachim Kuhs)
. – I supported this report with major reservations.Sinn Féin is opposed to the European Public Prosecutor as it is a step towards full harmonisation of legal systems. Ireland’s common law system is vet different to most mainland systems and harmonisation is not desirable.Overall the fight against fraud and the need to protect taxpayers’ money justified my voting in favour. Among the strong points were the fight against organised crime, transparency in the EU’s expenditure, the importance of the Anti-Fraud Strategy in the Member States (NAFSs) and the need for an EU strategy on the ‘revolving doors’ problem.
Humanitarian situation in Venezuela and migration and refugee crisis (RC-B9-0211/2020, B9-0211/2020, B9-0212/2020, B9-0213/2020, B9-0214/2020, B9-0215/2020)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A9-0124/2020 -José Gusmão)
. – I voted in favour of this report which aims to increase workers’ rights and protections. The report as adopted in the EMPL Committee contains strong text on collective bargaining, combats abuse of atypical contracts and platform workers, strong on the issue of gender equality. It calls on the Council and Member States to revise the guidelines for the Member States’ employment policies in line with the objective of recovering from the social and economic impacts of the COVID-19 crisis.
Draft amending budget no 5 to the general budget 2020 Continuation of the support to refugees and host communities in response to the Syria crisis in Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey (A9-0127/2020 - Monika Hohlmeier)
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2020: continuation of humanitarian support to refugees in Turkey (A9-0125/2020 - Monika Hohlmeier)
. – I was happy to support use of the contingency margin to allow contained provision of humanitarian assistance to those affected by conflict in Syria and neighbouring countries.It is important to note the funding will go to humanitarian assistance directly and not to Turkey or the Turkish Government.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Certain uses of chromium trioxide (B9-0202/2020)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Active substances, including flumioxazine (B9-0203/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this objection, because I do not agree this chemical should be automatically renewed for another year. The initial period of approval for this chemical expired a number of years ago, but its use licence was extended while the full renewal process was ongoing. Since its initial approval, concerns have been raised as to its safety. It has been identified as a probable endocrine disruptor. Considering this, I believe we must await the results of more comprehensive testing, which forms part of the full approval process. Until this process is complete and the results indicate the chemical is safe for usage, no further approvals should be permitted.
A comprehensive European approach to energy storage (A9-0130/2020 - Claudia Gamon)
. – I abstained on this report. The file deals with energy storage. It contains good points such as calling for transition to a highly energy-efficient and renewables-based economy, the contribution of energy storage technologies to fighting energy poverty, and underlines the role of storage especially for energy isolated or island Member States.However, the report focuses on opening up the energy market to big business and a level playing field to aid competition. The aim of the European strategy on energy storage is to lift the barriers of the energy market for the benefit of big companies, instead of enhancing energy storage in order to ensure equal access to energy as a public good for all (at prices that are socioeconomically affordable for the consumers).
Revision of the guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure (B9-0122/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution calling for the revision of the TEN-E guidelines. It is counter-productive that the EU is funding fossil fuel projects – this contradicts the EU’s climate commitments and the Paris Agreement. EU energy funding should be used for sustainable projects. I also oppose the inclusion of Shannon LNG in the EU’s Projects of Common Interest (PCI) list.
Conclusion of an EU - New Zealand agreement, under negotiation, on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A9-0131/2020 - Annalisa Tardino)
Chemicals strategy for sustainability (B9-0222/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this ENVI-adopted resolution aiming to influence the announced Chemical Strategy for Sustainability, which is part of the Green Deal and will be published in September or October. The resolution provides a strong basis for a health-first approach in Parliament’s position towards the future European chemicals strategy.
Transitional provisions in order to address the impact of COVID-19 crisis (amendment of Regulation (EU) 2016/1628) (C9-0161/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this regulation, whose objective is to give producers of non-road mobile machinery (NRMM) – tractors, garden machines, forestry machines, etc. – 12 extra months of lead time to comply with the emission limits decided by the EU in 2016, on top of the transition period they have already had, between 1 January 2017 and now. The reason for the proposed extension is that the COVID-19 crisis has led to interruptions in the supply of parts and components to the industry, leaving manufacturers with stocks of engines and unfinished products.
Conduct of clinical trials with and supply of medicinal products for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms intended to treat or prevent coronavirus disease (C9-0185/2020)
. – As part of its new vaccine strategy, the Commission has proposed temporarily relaxing strict rules on genetically modified organisms in order to speed up the search for a COVID-19 vaccine and cure. Current GMO legislation does not have any procedure in place for a crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. That is why the Commission has proposed adapting the GMO regulatory framework in order to allow clinical trials of vaccines against COVID-19 to be conducted within the shortest possible time. This derogation would apply as long as COVID-19 is regarded as a pandemic by the World Health Organization or as long as the Commission recognises COVID-19 as a public health emergency. Whilst we in Sinn Féin oppose any loosening of the regulations on GMOs, we recognise that every effort must be made to develop a vaccine and save lives and I therefore voted in favour.
A comprehensive Union policy on preventing money laundering and terrorist financing – Commission's Action plan and other recent developments (B9-0207/2020)
. – I supported this resolution as it contains many important positive points, including the return of confiscated assets to third countries and their use, as well as the confirmation that some of the financial secrecy jurisdictions are in the EU and that the fight against money laundering and corruption has to start within the EU.I am uncomfortable or outright opposed to some of the report’s issues, such as sanctions on third countries and the use of public-private partnerships, but ultimately money laundering, including tax evasion, hurts ordinary workers and must be challenged.
Proposal for a Council decision authorising Portugal to apply a reduced rate of excise duty on certain alcoholic products produced in the autonomous regions of Madeira and the Azores (A9-0140/2020 - Younous Omarjee)
Effective measures to “green” Erasmus+, Creative Europe and the European Solidarity Corps (A9-0141/2020 - Laurence Farreng)
. – I voted in favour of this own-initiative report, which deals with the role of culture and education in the fight against climate change and in sustainable development while putting forward specific proposals to reduce the environmental impact of the three flagship programmes for education (Erasmus+), culture (Creative Europe) and volunteering (European Solidarity Corps) and to fully integrate the programmes into the Green Deal by fostering their incalculable potential.The report encourages green mobility, but also highlights that this should not result in the exclusions of any participants of the above programmes, because green mobility is not always possible.
The EU’s role in protecting and restoring the world’s forests (A9-0143/2020 - Stanislav Polčák)
. – I voted in favour of this own-initiative report. On 23 July 2019, the Commission adopted a communication setting out a new framework of actions to protect and restore the world’s forests, which host 80% of biodiversity on land and are vital to our efforts to fight climate change.The communication came in response to repeated requests from the Council and European Parliament, calling for more coordinated action in particular via the elimination of deforestation from agricultural commodity chains.The report calls for strengthened support for protection, restoration and sustainable management of forests, the protection of biodiversity and carbon sinks, as well as to recognise forests’ productivity and ecosystem services. The report also states that all future trade and investment agreements should contain binding provisions to prevent deforestation and forest degradation.
EU-African security cooperation in the Sahel region, West Africa and the Horn of Africa (A9-0129/2020 - Javier Nart)
Amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A9-0148/2020 - Nikos Androulakis)
. – I voted in favour of this file, which is to do with RescEU and the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) which was established to improve the EU response to natural and man-made disasters inside and outside Europe. The purpose is to assist in emergencies such as wildfires, floods, marine pollution, earthquakes, hurricane, and industrial accidents.The proposal in this file is to broaden the scope of the UCPM to health. This would mean funds could be drawn down to purchase products such as PPE or ventilators etc.
Global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data (A9-0144/2020 - Jutta Paulus)
. – I voted in favour of this report to create a reduction of carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions from the shipping sector. Shipping accounts for 3% of global emissions. This report broadens the scope of existing legislation to align it with the global data collection system of the International Maritime Organization.
Draft Council decision on the system of own resources of the European Union (A9-0146/2020 - José Manuel Fernandes, Valerie Hayer)
. – I opposed this report.The report is a list of amendments to a Commission/Council proposal on own resources (EU taxes) which aim to add new EU taxes on financial transactions, corporations, emissions, plastics, a digital tax and a carbon levy. While some of these taxes may have social merits, this report sees them as mere budgetary tools for a centralised EU budget.Sinn Féin is opposed to EU taxes, especially when the aim is to fund the EU directly.
Implementation of the EU Association Agreement with Georgia (A9-0136/2020 - Sven Mikser)
. – I abstained on this vote. Although I agree with the language in the areas Georgia must approve, such as LGBT rights, respect for human rights, judicial reform and freedom of the press, I disagree with the economic demands mentioned. Parliament’s text sets the price of greater cooperation as public administration reform, decentralisation and structural reforms to make the climate more attractive for foreign investors.We know that this language is a thinly veiled reference to extensive privatisation of the public sector. Sinn Féin believes this would have a negative impact on workers, and importantly should be a decision taken by the Georgian people, free from international pressure. This practice by the EU of using trade deals to spread neoliberal policies must be halted. Finally, the report references the European and Euro-Atlantic integration deal. This is designed to facilitate Georgia’s joining of NATO. We oppose the EU advocating NATO’s expansion.
Type approval of motor vehicles (Real Driving Emissions) (A9-0139/2020 - Esther de Lange)
Just Transition Fund (A9-0135/2020 - Manolis Kefalogiannis)
. – I supported this report as a properly resourced Just Transition Fund could be crucial in aiding the transition of the Midlands region in my constituency where many people are linked to industries reliant on peat extraction. I am disappointed the fund has been savagely cut in the latest deal on the budget and the recovery fund. The Irish Government must step up and make sure a sufficient transition fund is in place. I rejected the amendments which sought to allow natural gas to be considered a transition fuel. This will only delay the real transition away from all fossil fuels that is required.
Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A9-0137/2020 - Hannah Neumann)
. – I voted in favour of this report. The report deals with transparency of arms exports from EU countries. It calls for greater reporting obligations for EU countries, an end to the arms race and condemns the export of weapons to active war zones like Yemen and the oppression of the civilian population.
Determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law
. – I voted in favour of this resolution which details democratic deficiencies related to elections, media freedom, freedom of assembly, sex education, LGBTI rights, sexual and reproductive health and rights. It is rightly critical of Commission and Council for their lack of action and calls on both institutions to make full use of all the tools at their disposal, including budgetary tools.
Strategic approach to pharmaceuticals in the environment
. – I voted in favour of this Joint Motion for Resolution on pharmaceuticals, which relates to the wide use of pharmaceuticals in human and veterinary medicines and how they have increased their concentrations in the environment in the past 20 years.Pharmaceuticals reach the environment through the discharge of effluent from urban wastewater treatment plants, the spreading of animal manure and aquaculture, discharge of effluent from plants, the spreading of sewage sludge, grazing livestock, the treatment of pets, improper disposal into landfill of unused pharmaceuticals and contaminated waste.Pharmaceuticals discarded in the environment have been shown to pose a risk to fish or other wildlife, for example by affecting their ability to reproduce, by altering their behaviour in ways jeopardising their survival, or through direct toxic effects. In addition, incorrectly disposed medicines may contribute to the serious problem of antimicrobial resistance.The resolution makes a number of proposals to help mitigate the issue, such as: calling on the Member States and the Commission to promote training for healthcare professionals, including veterinarians, physicians and pharmacists, and awareness-raising campaigns for patients, on the prudent use of pharmaceuticals.
Maximising the energy efficiency potential of the EU building stock
. – I voted in favour of this own-initiative report regarding increasing the energy efficiency of EU building stock. The report references the impact of gentrification, renoviction and energy poverty. Homeowners, in particular low-income and energy-poor homeowners must be supported in making their building stock climate resilient. Member States should allocate funding to tackle energy poverty and the energy efficiency of buildings.
Shortage of medicines - how to address an emerging problem
. – I voted in favour of this Own Initiative Report on addressing the shortage of medicines.The report calls for a strategy for Europe to regain its independence with regard to healthcare, to secure its supply of affordable medicines prioritising the interest and safety of patients; it stresses the importance of ensuring that all Member States have fair access to the supply chain and the need for the Union’s pharmaceutical industry to have a diversified supply chain and a medicine shortage risk mitigation plan to cope with any vulnerabilities and risks to their supply chain. It contains good elements on patients participation, transparency of public funding etc.
Implementation of National Roma Integration Strategies: combating negative attitudes towards people with Romani background in Europe
. – I voted in favour of this resolution, which is based on an assessment of the implementation of National Strategies on Roma inclusion. The report aims to contribute to the post-2020 EU Framework for National Strategies.It addresses some good recommendations to the European Commission and Member States and calls for a legislative proposal for the ‘Equality, Inclusion Participation of Romani people and Combating Antigypsyism’, which would include discrimination against Irish Travellers.
Preparation of the Special European Council, focusing on the dangerous escalation and the role of Turkey in the Eastern-Mediterranean
. – I voted in favour of this resolution. The resolution condemns the provocative actions of Turkey in the eastern Mediterranean and expresses solidarity with Greece and Cyprus. Territorial waters must be respected. Sinn Féin urges the parties to return to negotiations and for a deescalating of the situation.
Situation in Belarus
. – I abstained on this vote. Firstly, I support new free and fair elections in Belarus. I also condemn the police repression of the public and opposition that has taken place in recent weeks. Unfortunately, the text goes much beyond these issues. It promises money to Belarus only on stipulation that it reforms and restructures its economy, it calls for the EU to fund the opposition, it recognises the opposition coordination council as the representation of the people, and it calls for sanctions on non-governmental business people who are deemed to be supporting the government.I believe the EU’s desire to interject itself on the side of the opposition is unhelpful when tensions are already high. I am against any interference, whether it be from Russia or the EU. The EU must limit itself to encouraging dialogue and respect for human rights; in particular, I oppose it calling for an exchange of money for restructuring of the economy. This in reality means privatisation of the public sector. A decision, which should only be assessed by the Belarusian people, free from external pressure.
Situation in Russia, the poisoning of Alexei Navalny
. – I abstained on this vote. Firstly, I am very concerned by the poisoning of a member of the Russian opposition. There must be an independent international investigation to determine who is responsible, in particular to determine if it was carried out on behalf of the Russian Government. I did not support the resolution because it proposed to isolate Russia internationally, support all opponents of the Russian Government and increase sanctions. I don’t believe this is the role the EU should play on an international stage, in the current climate.I would welcome UN initiatives to manage the situation. The EU prides itself on being an agent of peace and dialogue, but taking such a stance would only cause a severe deterioration of relations with Russia. Sinn Féin believes the EU should challenge Russia on breaches of human rights through constructive engagement, and consider stronger measures only in situations where no other option is available.Finally, I did not support adding a reference to Nord stream 2, although Sinn Féin is against any new investments in gas infrastructure, it felt the proposed mention here was an attempt to push a view that any EU dependence on Russia is a security risk.
Draft amending budget no 8: Increase of payment appropriations for the Emergency Support Instrument to finance the COVID-19 vaccines strategy and for the impact of the Corona Response Investment Initiative Plus (C9-0290/2020 - Monika Hohlmeier)
. – I was happy to support this amending budget measure as it ensures an adequate resourcing of emergency COVID-related payments and the COVID Vaccine Strategy.It is important that policy remains ready to deliver emergency support as long as COVID-19 and its impact is being felt by people in Ireland and across Europe.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3) and (4)(c): Maximum residue levels for several substances including flonicamid, haloxyfop and mandestrobin (B9-0245/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this objection, which related to raising the maximum residue limits (MRLs) of several chemical pesticides, which are used on crops. The objection text requests the Commission to come up with a new proposal, having addressed the recent concerns raised about flonicamid.Flonicamid is under scrutiny in the United States for potentially posing a higher risk to pollinators than previously understood. The producer, ISK Biosciences, has submitted research, which shows flonicamid exposes bees to up to 51 times the amount of flonicamid that would cause them substantial harm. I would urge the Commission to work with EFSA to address these concerns as soon as possible to ensure the appropriate residue level is identified. Farms need access to plant protection chemicals but also need to be assured their impact will not result in environmental harm.
Cultural recovery of Europe
. – This Joint Motion for Resolution is on the recovery in the cultural sector in the context of COVID-19.The resolution expresses its sincere solidarity with performers, artists, creators, authors, publishers, their companies and all other cultural creators and workers, including amateur creators, who all have been severely affected by the global COVID-19 pandemic, and pays tribute to their actions and solidarity during the difficult times.The resolution is critical of the fact that Creative Europe has not been allocated additional funding from the Next Generation EU Fund and asks the Member States to ensure that specific domestic social, fiscal and economic rules usually applied to cultural and creative players can be extended during and after the crisis.
Covid-19: EU coordination of health assessments and risk classification and the consequences on Schengen and the single market (RC-B9-0257/2020)
. – I was happy to support this resolution. Close and sensible cooperation in fighting COVID-19 makes sense and the resolution struck the right balance between cooperation and attempting to justify a centralised EU health system.Much of the resolution discussed the impact on the Schengen borders. As Ireland is not part of Schengen, I abstained on some of these points.
The importance of urban and green infrastructure - European Year of Greener Cities 2022 (B9-0243/2020)
Amending Regulation (EU) No 514/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards the decommitment procedure
. – This file provides flexibility to Member States in relation to their spending of the AMIF (Migration and Asylum) and ISF (Internal Security) funds by extending the deadline for their use. While not endorsing all aspects of EU policy in these areas, I support the additional flexibility it provides to Member States.
Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion: indirect taxes on 'traditional' rum
Draft amending budget No 7/2020: Update of revenue (own resources)
. – I supported this technical budget report which updated figures based on latest forecasts. I have grave concerns about the EU budget proposal but this report should not be seen as an endorsement of the budget proposal before Parliament. This is a technical adjustment that is supported in the name of accuracy and good governance.
Implementation of the common commercial policy – annual report 2018 (A9-0160/2020 - Jörgen Warborn)
. – The report provided a review of the EU’s current deals. I voted against the report because it failed to call for a reform of EU trade policy, which is long overdue. EU trade policy overly focuses on liberalising trade at all costs. The elements of the agreement, which deal with respect for human rights, environmental protection and not damaging local production, are often weak. This allows infringement to go unaddressed.An example of this is the recent Mercosur agreement; the whole world watched the Amazon burn to facilitate an increase in beef supply for the EU market. Instead of the European Commission immediately calling for a halt to any kind of implantation of the agreement, EU citizens were forced to lobby their national governments to act. This demonstrates how the weak nature of the guarantees in trade agreements means a blind eye can be turned if it is politically beneficial, in this case for German car manufacturers who want access to the Brazilian market.
European Climate Law (A9-0162/2020 - Jytte Guteland)
. – The European Climate Law is a cornerstone legislation of the European Green Deal. This proposal for this regulation aims at providing direction by enshrining the EU 2050 climate-neutrality objective in legislation. It sets the goal of climate neutrality by 2050, as well as the design of the trajectory to get there, and updates the 2030 emissions reduction target, which is now set at 60%. Therefore, I voted in favour.
Equivalence of field inspections carried out on cereal seed-producing crops and equivalence of cereal seed produced in Ukraine (A9-0164/2020 - Veronika Vrecionová)
. – I voted against the proposal because the text failed to consider the relevant ramifications of the proposal’s approval. This proposal has been portrayed as purely technical and therefore not worth much examination. However, it would have a large impact on EU seed producers. Large corporations, like Bayer, have been waiting for this approval as an avenue to get more seeds into the EU market. It is in light of this that an impact assessment must be carried out to identify how this would affect EU SME seed producers. During the current pandemic, we must be careful not to destabilise struggling EU enterprises further. Until the impact assessment has been completed, I will not support the proposal.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3) and (4)(c): Specifications for titanium dioxide (E 171) (B9-0308/2020)
. – The resolution objects to the continued approval of titanium dioxide (E171) in food.Titanium dioxide is a food additive partly made of nanoparticles and mainly found in food such as confectionery, cakes, desserts, ice cream, biscuits, chocolate bars, bakery and pastry products. Its main function is to impart the white colour or opacity of products. It is mainly used in food products which are particularly popular with children, such as chewing gum, candies, chocolate and ice cream, which raises concerns about the potential high exposure of this vulnerable section of the population.Authorising the continued use of this additive could expose consumers to a possible carcinogen. Therefore, I supported this objection to the continued approval of titanium dioxide.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3) and (4)(c) : Maximum levels of acrylamide in certain foodstuffs for infants and young children (B9-0311/2020)
. – Acrylamide is present in many foods that are baked, fried or roasted. Lab tests have shown that the presence of acrylamide in the diet has caused cancer in animals; scientists have therefore concluded that it poses a risk to people as well. In 2015, the ESFA called acrylamide in food a public health concern.This objection is raised because the maximum limits of acrylamide in foodstuffs that the Commission proposes are not deemed low enough to protect consumers against hazardous substances. Therefore, I voted in favour of the objection.
The European Forest Strategy - The Way Forward (A9-0154/2020 - Petri Sarvamaa)
. – I voted against the EU forestry strategy for a number of reasons. Among those:• The report overly focussed on management and production of forests as opposed to protection and afforestation.• The reports ambition does not link in sufficiently with the biodiversity strategy.• It is heavily in favour of biomass despite us knowing this approach is not ideal.Parliament’s Committee on the Environment tabled a stronger text, which I supported, addressing many of the concerns raised. Unfortunately, this was rejected in the plenary vote.
Decision empowering France to conclude an international agreement concerning the Channel tunnel (C9-0211/2020)
Organic production: date of application and certain other dates (C9-0286/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this proposal as it aimed to delay the implementation of changes to the legislation regulating organics, in light of the current pandemic. Organics producers are facing an incredibly difficult time and the implementation of the changes may have increased the burden significantly. I believe the 12-month delay in implementation is a reasonable solution.
The rule of law and fundamental rights in Bulgaria (B9-0309/2020)
. – I support this resolution calling on the Commission to address the reform of the judicial system and the fight against corruption, and to tackle deficiencies in relation to the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. The resolution rightly identifies instances of misuse of EU funds, high-level corruption, police violence against protesters, smear campaigns against journalists and discrimination against minorities.
Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee (B9-0310/2020)
. – I supported this resolution.The Youth Guarantee is a commitment by all Member States to ensure that all young people under the age of 25 years receive quality offers of employment, continued education, apprenticeships, and traineeships.In this proposal, Parliament called on the Council to enhance the efficiency of the Youth Guarantee, to reverse the reduction in the allocation for targeted actions for young people not in employment in the ESF+ (from 15% to 10%) and to tackle low-quality offers to young people by adopting a Quality Framework for Traineeships, as well as a binding principle of remuneration.The resolution also welcomed the wider age gap in this reinforced Youth Guarantee (15 to 29) and the efforts to make the Youth Guarantee more inclusive to persons from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Amending Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 as regards specific measures on L-category end-of-series vehicles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (A9-0190/2020 - Maria Grapini)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2020/001 ES/Galicia shipbuilding ancillary sectors (A9-0192/2020 - Valerie Hayer)
Discharge 2018: General budget of the EU - European Economic and Social Committee (A9-0188/2020 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
Discharge 2018: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council (A9-0189/2020 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
Digital Services Act: Improving the functioning of the Single Market (A9-0181/2020 - Alex Agius Saliba)
. – I abstained on this report. The principal reason for this abstention was the unfortunate inclusion of the so-called ‘Good Samaritan’ clause. This is a major mistake and will allow Big Tech companies to evade responsibility by claiming they did their best to stop illegal activity.There were some positives, such as stricter regulation of online market places, transparency requirements on commercial communications, and the demand for a clear distinction between illegal content and harmful content.On balance, the Good Samaritan issue compelled me to abstain.
Digital Services Act: adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online (A9-0177/2020 - Tiemo Wölken)
. – I supported this report. This is an EP report setting out their demands to the Commission before the upcoming revision of the Digital Services Act. This one looks at the legal side. It is generally progressive and calls for greater transparency, interoperability and a crackdown on targeted advertising.I am ambivalent regarding whether there is a need for an EU-level monitoring agency and will examine this issue further.
Digital Services Act and fundamental rights issues posed (A9-0172/2020 - Kris Peeters)
. – Among other things this report calls for stronger obligations of transparency for online services (including algorithms), criticises the business model based on collection of personal data and sensational attention-seeking content, and calls for keeping some liability exemptions for platforms not having actual knowledge of illegal content, which is important to avoid censorship of legal content.For these reasons I voted in favour.
Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies (A9-0186/2020 - Ibán García Del Blanco)
Civil liability regime for artificial intelligence (A9-0178/2020 - Axel Voss)
Recommendation to the Council and the VPC/HR concerning the Implementation and governance of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) (A9-0165/2020 - Radosław Sikorski)
. – The Permanent Structured Cooperation is the part of the European Union’s security and defence policy.This report is calling for increased cooperation between Member States in the sector of defence and for an increase defence investment expenditure, with the obligation of the establishment of a regular review of these commitments.Sinn Féin is opposed to the militarisation of the EU and therefore I voted against this report.
Report on the implementation of the EU Association Agreement with the Republic of Moldova (A9-0166/2020 - Dragoş Tudorache)
. – I voted in favour of this report.In 2014 Moldova and the EU signed an association agreement (AA), encompassing the Deep and Comprehensive Free-Trade Area (DCFTA). Assuming its responsibility for parliamentary scrutiny of EU policies, the EP report intends to analyse the implementation of the agreements and the use of funds.Much of the report deals with Moldovaʼs efforts to combat corruption. It insists on the respect of ‘common values’, such as democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and demands necessary reforms, in particular in the areas of rule of law, fight against organised crime, money laundering, etc.The report also supports the 5+2 negotiation process to reach a peaceful of the Transnistrian conflict.
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the VPC/HR on relations with Belarus (A9-0167/2020 - Petras Auštrevičius)
. – I abstained on this vote. Firstly, I support new free and fair elections in Belarus. I also condemn the police repression of the public and opposition.Unfortunately, the text goes much beyond these issues. It calls Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya the President-elect in the ‘eyes of the people’ and calls for sanctions against family members of persons deemed to be involved with the government crackdown. Whilst we support targeted sanctions in certain instances, we are not in favour of placing sanctions and/or visa bans on persons whose only connection to the crackdown is through family.The EU must limit itself to encouraging dialogue and respect for human rights.
Recommendation to the VPC/HR and to the Council in preparation of the 10th Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT) review process, nuclear arms control and nuclear disarmament options (A9-0020/2020 - Sven Mikser)
The future of European education in the context of Covid-19 (B9-0338/2020)
. – I supported this resolution on the Education Sector during the COVID pandemic.The resolution stressed that access to quality and inclusive education and lifelong learning is a basic human right. It also makes clear that education policy is the exclusive competence of the Member States, with the Union playing a supporting and coordinating role.The resolution highlights that digital education gaps have exacerbated existing inequalities - both among and within the Member States - and has had a disproportionate impact on those already suffering social, economic or other disadvantages, those with learning difficulties and disabilities and those from other vulnerable or minority groups.
Obligations of the Commission in the field of visa reciprocity in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 (B9-0339/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this motion which insists that the Commission takes action to ensure that the US provide visa-free access to citizens of all EU Member States, as US citizens enjoy visa-free access throughout the EU. It is not acceptable that citizens of 5 EU member states are discriminated against in this way.
Economic policies of the euro area 2020 (A9-0193/2020 - Joachim Schuster)
. – I rejected this report. Despite some nice rhetoric the logic of the report is rooted in the austerity rules including accepting the EU Semester being at the core of the recovery fund. This is unacceptable.Now is the time for the Eurozone to remove the fiscal rules and instead build a framework for a socially and environmentally just recovery. This is not possible within the current economic rule set.
Employment and social policies of the euro area 2020 (A9-0183/2020 - Klára Dobrev)
. – I voted in favour of this own initiative report on the employment and social policies in the euro area 2020 as part of the European Semester cycle.The report criticises the European Semester for not having an agenda to monitor and address the increase of inequalities in the EU. The report asks the Commission and Member States to support the capacity building of the social partners, including through the European Social Fund+, in order to strengthen trade union density, social dialogue, collective bargaining, and the involvement of workers in company matters. Moreover, public procurement is suggested as a means to strengthen collective bargaining.
Deforestation (A9-0179/2020 - Delara Burkhardt)
. – I voted in favour of this report, which called on the Commission to put forward rules to stop EU-driven global deforestation through mandatory due diligence for companies placing products on the EU market, highlights that the EU needs to ensure that it only promotes global supply chains and financial flows which are sustainable and deforestation-free and which do not result in human rights violations.This report also:• Called for binding definitions of what constitutes deforestation and forest degradation.• The report has a strong and inclusive focus on human rights and indigenous people to be included in the required due diligence legislation.• States that European financial institutions would also have to show their investments are not linked to deforestation, ecosystem destruction or human rights abuses, while traceability obligations for traders on the EU market should also be established.• Underlines how EU trade and investment policy should include binding and enforceable sustainable development chapters that fully respect international commitments.
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD (A8-0200/2019 - Peter Jahr)
. – I am hugely disappointed this opportunity for a real reform of the CAP has been wasted. It is on that basis I voted against the proposals.The loopholes that allowed enterprises to receive CAP support running to hundreds of thousands of euros would not be closed, while the majority of farmers fight to survive on meagre payments.Sinn Féin supported a ring—fencing of 30% of Pillar 1 to increase support for farmers on the first thirty hectares they declare, labelled the redistributive payment. The position adopted today at plenary has reduced that to a mere 6%.Combining the redistributive payment with 100% convergence would have been the best way to balance support among farmers. Although it is positive that 100% convergence was carried in the vote, the failure to sufficiently fund the redistributive payment means some small to medium farmers, who had entitlements over the national average, may actually lose through full convergence.Supporting 100% convergence but decapitating the redistributive payment is a perfect example of how the political will simply did not exist to make the CAP about securing the future of our family farmers, as opposed to subsidising already large and profitable businesses.
Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring (A8-0199/2019 - Ulrike Müller)
. – The financing and monitoring vote on the CAP presented an opportunity to formalise the transition from a performance to a compliance model. Finally, Member States would be judged on what progress they have made towards the objectives of the CAP, such as ensuring a fair standard of living for our farming communities and implementing the green deal. I am committed to a CAP which works for farmers and our planet. However, the changes to the text put forward by the EPP and S&D were a deliberate attempt to undermine this transition. As they were carried in the final vote, I voted against the text.
Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other Regulations (A8-0198/2019 - Eric Andrieu)
Introducing exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the European Union's Stabilisation and Association process (A9-0175/2020 - Emmanuel Maurel)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events MON 87427, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603 (B9-0346/2020)
. – I supported this objection as a qualified majority of Member States does not support the authorisations, in the comitology process. In addition, they exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. I believe we must apply the precautionary principle, which would entail EFSA not green lighting any sub-combinations of stacked events unless they have been thoroughly evaluated thoroughly.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified soybean SYHT0H2 (SYN-ØØØH2-5) (B9-0349/2020)
. – I supported this objection as a qualified majority of Member States does not support the authorisations, in the comitology process. In addition, they exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. I believe we must apply the precautionary principle, which would entail EFSA not green lighting any sub-combinations of stacked events unless they have been thoroughly evaluated thoroughly.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and genetically modified maize combining two, three or four of the single events MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603 (B9-0347/2020)
. – I supported this objection as, in the comitology process, a qualified majority of Member States does not support the authorisations. In addition, they exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. I believe we must apply the precautionary principle, which would entail the European Food Safety Authority not green-lighting any sub-combinations of stacked events unless they have been thoroughly evaluated.
EU/Senegal Fisheries Partnership Agreement: implementation of the Agreement. Protocol (A9-0180/2020 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
. – I voted against this report.The European Union has signed a series of fisheries partnership agreements with non-EU countries, which provide for EU financial and technical support in exchange for fishing rights for surplus stocks in the country’s exclusive economic zone. These agreements also govern resource conservation and environmental sustainability, ensuring that all EU vessels are subject to the same rules of control and transparency, and supporting the partner country’s own sustainable fisheries policy.This renewal of the EU-Senegal agreement covers a period of five years and provides fishing opportunities for 45 boats (28 tuna freezer seiners, 10 pole-and-line vessels, five longliners and two trawlers) for a reference tonnage of 10 000 tonnes per year for tuna and an authorised volume of catches of black hake of 1 750 tonnes per year.Foreign boats have increased the pressure on local fish populations in the exclusive waters of Senegal.Whilst EU boats and EU funding have been playing a role in improving the monitoring of fishery activities, this agreement is not robust enough to protect coastal communities in Senegal, nor is it robust enough to protect the biodiversity and sustainability of its fisheries.
EU/Senegal Fisheries Partnership Agreement: implementation of the Agreement. Protocol (Resolution) (A9-0182/2020 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
. – This resolution was based on the implementation of the fisheries partnership agreement between the Republic of Senegal and the European Union, which I voted against due to the agreement not being robust enough to protect coastal communities in Senegal, nor robust enough to protect the biodiversity and sustainability of its fisheries.
EU/Seychelles Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Implementation. Protocol (2020-2026) (A9-0185/2020 - Caroline Roose)
. – The agreement grants fishing rights to EU vessels fishing mainly for the different tuna species in Seychelles waters. The new protocol provides for fishing opportunities for 40 tuna purse-seine vessels (the same number as under the previous protocol), 8 surface longliners (2 more than under the previous protocol) and support vessels, in line with the relevant Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) resolutions. (The number of vessels with fishing opportunities in the region under the new protocol is higher than under the previous protocol).Due to the deplorable state of the yellowfin tuna stock, targeted by most of these vessels, scientists as well as local fishing organisations recommend a cap and then a reduction of fishing capacity in the region.This agreement is not robust enough to protect fish stocks and biodiversity, therefore I voted against.
Common system of value added tax: identification of taxable persons in Northern Ireland (A9-0200/2020 - Irene Tinagli)
. – I strongly support this report which shows the EU is serious about the Irish Protocol. This report (the Tinagli report) is implementing the Irish protocol. It is protecting access for the north of Ireland to the single market for goods through changes to VAT law. While Britain reneges from its commitments the EU is following through and we are overseeing that process. It is another important step in securing an all-island approach to life after Brexit. These measures ensure that businesses in the six counties are not burdened with endless red tape and it allows a seamless transition so in essence they can continue selling products to the 26 counties and the rest of the EU uninterrupted.
Introduction of capacity limits for Eastern Baltic cod, data collection and control measures in the Baltic Sea and permanent cessation for fleets fishing for Eastern Baltic cod (A9-0093/2020 - Niclas Herbst)
. – I supported this file which concerns vessels impacted by severe reductions in available quotas. The Baltic Sea ecosystem has been in a fragile condition for decades due to overfishing, and environmental factors, such as oxygen depletion, pollution levels, global warming, lack of food, the prevalence of parasites, etc. The reduction for Eastern Baltic cod in 2020 was particularly severe. The Council effectively banned fishing; only by-catches of cod are still allowed. This proposal assists fishers negatively impacted through funding that would be matched by the Member State.
Enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (A9-0128/2020 - Manuel Pizarro)
. – I voted in favour of this report. On 11 September 2019, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 573/2014/EU on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES). This would extend the public employment services network which has been operating successfully since June 2014 for an additional five years.The original aim was to promote cooperation, exchange and mutual learning between the member organisations and to receive feedback on employment policy initiatives. This cooperation was formalised in 2013 to support innovation, benchmarking and mutual learning at a European level.
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 - all sections (A9-0206/2020 - Pierre Larrouturou, Olivier Chastel)
. – I rejected this report as it, once again, supports an EU Budget which includes support for the arms industry. This spending limits the positive aspects of the Budget such as research and cultural initiatives. The EU must break from this spending of taxpayers’ money on security and defence which are national competencies, and stop funding the arms industry.
EU/Seychelles Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Implementation. Protocol (2020-2026) (resolution) (A9-0184/2020 - Caroline Roose)
. – This resolution was based on the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Seychelles and its implementing protocol.I supported this resolution, which takes a critical stance towards the implementation report. It calls for a detailed evaluation of the effects of the SFPA on local economies in terms of employment, infrastructure development and social and labour conditions; requests transparency from the institutions in relation to meetings etc.; and highlights how the agreement will have a negative impact on the yellowfin tuna stock, which is already overfished.
Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (“EU4Health Programme”) (A9-0196/2020 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
. – On 28 May 2020, the European Commission published the legislative proposal for the next European health programme, to be called ‘EU4Health’, as part of its overall proposal for the EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for the period 2021-2027. In the context of COVID-19, a stand-alone programme for health (previously, a health strand within the European Social Fund Plus had been proposed) and a significantly increased budget were proposed. The budget forms part of the horizontal MFF negotiations. The EU4Health Programme will come into effect on 1 January 2021 as part of the overall MFF timeline.This was a positive report that highlights: (i) the inequalities in health status among population groups, countries and regions; (ii) access to affordable, preventive and curative health care of good quality; and (iii) the burden from non-communicable diseases, including cancer, mental health, rare diseases and risks from health determinants, etc. Therefore I voted in favour.
Sustainable Europe Investment Plan - How to finance the Green Deal (A9-0198/2020 -Siegfried Mureşan, Paul Tang)
. – I abstained on the final vote due to the report’s insistence on supporting EU taxes and additional own resources.I fully support green investment and this must be a priority for the EU and Member States. The procedure used by Parliament for this report made it very difficult for groups to have separate and split votes where I could have shown a more detailed position.Therefore, despite my support for green investment, I felt it necessary to abstain.
InvestEU Programme (A9-203/2020 - José Manuel Fernandes, Irene Tinagli)
. – I supported this report as investment is essential to economic recovery and the creation of a balanced and prosperous economy. The firepower of the EIB needs to be harnessed to make huge investment in public infrastructure and the green economy.The report could and should have been more ambitious in its climate aims and, I reject completely the idea that the arms industry (so called Defence industry) should benefit from public investment.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Croatia and Poland in relation to a natural disaster and advances to Croatia, Germany, Greece,Hungary, Ireland, Portugal and Spain in relation to a public health emergency (A9-0221/2020 - Olivier Chastel)
Draft amending budget No 9/2020: assistance to Croatia, Poland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Portugal and Spain (A9-0223/2020 - Monika Hohlmeier)
Tackling homelessness rates in the European Union (B9-0363/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution as it highlights the problem of homelessness in the EU. The Committee on Petitions has received several petitions raising concerns over the situation of more than 4 million homeless European citizens, and the number of homeless people in the EU has allegedly increased by over 70 % in the last 10 years.The resolution highlights the increase in the number of those that are homeless, and calls on the EU to tackle social exclusion and discrimination, and promote social justice and protection, equality between women and men, solidarity between generations, and protection of the rights of the child.
The Schengen system and measures taken during the COVID-19 crisis (B9-0362/2020)
. – I abstained on this resolution since it doesn’t impact Ireland as we are outside Schengen.The human considerations of keeping borders open are very important (people working, living or having family on the other side of the border). In the case of COVID-19, this requires close cooperation between administrations sharing a land border.
Markets in financial instruments: amending information requirements, product governance requirements and position limits to help the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic (A9-0208/2020 - Markus Ferber)
. – I rejected this report.This is part of a Commission initiative to unwind financial regulation using Covid as the excuse. This one focusses on MIFID which is the regulation for financial instruments (stock exchanges, investment instruments)It is particularly sensitive because it touches on gains made by the left in limiting speculation on food. The Commission say this is very limited but it is reopening an area that should be closed off. Creating financial instability and a return to laissez faire regulation is not a fit response to the Covid human and economic catastrophe. Investment funds, bankers and vulture funds should not be let off the leash and are not the solution to the Covid recession.
Towards a more sustainable single market for business and consumers (A9-0209/2020 - David Cormand)
. – I voted in favour of this report. This is a positive report which proposes to reduce waste by promoting sustainable consumption patterns and repair-reuse of used products. Our economic model is based on a system of overconsumption in which producers hasten the replacement of products by precipitating their obsolescence. I co-signed amendments that ensured that premature obsolescence would be tackled and introduced mandatory labelling on expected lifetime and reparability.
A New Industrial Strategy for Europe (A9-0197/2020 - Carlo Calenda)
Foreign policy consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak (A9-0204/2020 - Hilde Vautmans)
. – I abstained on this text. Although it contained some positive points like lifting sanctions and creating humanitarian corridors, it also called for removing unanimity in the European Council and boosting spending for EU militarisation. I do not believe we should be trying to reduce the say of individual states and spending EU taxpayer’s money on militarisation.I voted in favour of this proposal, as it may be an unavoidable consequence of the new relationship between the EU and the north of Ireland, due to Brexit. However, I have written to the Irish Government to voice the problems this may create for industry in the north of Ireland. I expect the Irish Government to begin immediately the work of identifying how these difficulties could be mitigated.
The application of Union tariff rate quotas and other import quotas (A9-0216/2020 - Christophe Hansen)
. – I voted in favour of this report.It points to one of the many problems Brexit causes to Ireland that has not been solved by the Withdrawal Agreement.The proposal is to prevent goods from third countries from circumventing EU quotas by entering the EU through the north of Ireland.A trade agreement between Britain and the EU would go a long way to solving the problem, but if there is no agreement the EU should look at alternative ways of solving the issues, possibly by including the 6 Counties in the EU quota in future EU trade agreements.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Lead in gunshot in or around wetlands (B9-0365/2020)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Active substances, including chlorotoluron (B9-0367/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this objection.Chlorotoluron is an active substance that has been on the market since March 2006. It is widely used for weed control in cereals crops and authorised in 20 Member States.The effects Choroturon has on the environment and on human health has never been properly reassessed since it is approval in 2006. Instead of a proper reassessment, as is prescribed in the legislation, the original authorisation has been extended a number of times. AS no comprehensive testing was carried out on chlorotoluron by the relevant authorities to ensure that it is safe, I supported the objection.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112: Carbendazim for use in certain biocidal products (B9-0366/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this objection.Both carbendazim in product-types 7 and 10 can be used in the treatment of outdoor paints for facades to avoid fungal and algal growth poses a high risk of water pollution due to the run-off of those biocides from the facades of buildings each time it rains. This could lead to unacceptable risks to the environment and human health. I support the objection until more comprehensive testing is carried down by the relevant authorities to ensure that it is safe.
Stocktaking of European elections (A9-0211/2020 - Pascal Durand)
. – Although the report is an implementation report and as such should evaluate the outcome of the 2019 EP elections, it mainly focuses on reform proposals for future elections, including the introduction of transnational lists, strengthening the Spitzenkandidat process and the role of European political parties in election and referendum campaigns, as well as the harmonisation of the electoral rules across the member states.There are some positive aspects in the report, in particular with regard to lowering the voting age.While the gender equality emphasis is welcome, it is based on the harmonisation of electoral systems.Despite the positives, I would recommend voting against, as its main focus is a federalist push with regard to the elections, including transnational lists and the harmonisation of electoral rules across the EU.
Situation of Fundamental Rights in the European Union - Annual Report for the years 2018-2019 (A9-0226/2020 - Clare Daly)
. – I commend the work done by Clare Daly on this report, and voted against it as it was considerably weakened. The refusal of the EP to refer to specific cases of breaches of human rights inside the EU, while presenting itself as a beacon of human rights across the world, is hypocritical. For this reason I voted against the report.
Escalating tensions in Varosha following the illegal actions by Turkey and the urgent need for the resumption of talks (B9-0355/2020)
. – I supported this condemnation of Turkey’s actions. The town should be handed over to UN control, and a plan created to allow its former residents to return to their homes. Turkey’s actions are a deliberate attempt to raise tensions in the region, and must be viewed alongside its actions in the Mediterranean. Additionally, the prohibition on deporting or transferring parts of a State’s own civilian population into the territory it occupies is set forth in the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Elimination of customs duties on certain products (A9-0217/2020 - Bernd Lange)
. – I voted against the deal because I am concerned that the elimination of tariffs would lead to low-priced American lobster flooding the EU market, which could have a detrimental effect on our fishing, coastal and island communities. This is already a hugely damaging time for Ireland’s fishing communities. COVID-19 and an impending Brexit has left the sector struggling. Tariff-free imports of US lobster would only add to that.
Union General Export Authorisation for the export of certain dual-use items from the Union to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C9-0345/2020 - Bernd Lange)
Temporary measures in relation to value added tax for COVID-19 vaccines and in vitro diagnostic medical devices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (C9-0352/2020)
. – I supported this report. This allows Member States to reduce VAT on COVID vaccines and testing kits. This will hopefully decrease the burden on bodies purchasing these essential items.I believe a similar approach should be taken to allow employers to purchase personal protective equipment for their employees at a zero or reduced rate of VAT.
Abortion rights in Poland (B9-0373/2020)
EU Trade Policy Review (B9-0370/2020)
. – I abstained on this text. To me, it represented a missed opportunity. What is required is a radical transformation of EU trade policy to one based on labour rights, environmental renewal and protection of local economies. This is not what we have seen up to this point. The Mercosur trade deal is a perfect example. It not only undermined struggling EU beef farmers but also resulted in increased deforestation of the Amazon. These considerations must be at the centre of such deals, not a drive to lower tariffs at all costs. This text unfortunately failed to address that challenge.
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Convention area (A9-0231/2020 - João Ferreira)
. – The purpose of this proposal it to transpose into EU law the control, conservation and management measures adopted by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC). The proposal sets out measures designed to protect certain marine species present in the area covered by the IATTC Convention, such as oceanic white-tip, silky, and hammerhead sharks and mobulid rays. Therefore I voted in favour.
EC/Mauritania Fisheries Partnership Agreement: extension of the Protocol (A9-0244/2020 - Annie Schreijer-Pierik)
. – I voted against the agreement because the money allocated to the local fisheries sector is the bare minimum, showing that the main aim in this agreement is to grant access to large external fisheries operators at the expense of the developing country in question.The EU’s fisheries agreements with West African states have long been criticised by NGOs for exporting the EU’s problem of over-exploiting its own fish stocks to African waters. Fish stocks in the African states’ waters are still being over-fished to serve the needs of the EU, not the African states.
EU/Cook Islands Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: extension of the implementation Protocol (A9-0243/2020 - François-Xavier Bellamy)
. – The Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Cook Islands entered into force on 10 May 2017. The Agreement’s four-year implementing protocol has applied since 14 October 2016 and expired on 13 October 2020. I voted against this proposal as it did not go far enough to mitigate the issue of overfishing and also because the money allocated under the agreement was the bare minimum.
Transitional provisions for support from the EAFRD and EAGF in the years 2021 and 2022 (A9-0101/2020 - Elsi Katainen)
European Year of Rail (2021) (A9-0191/2020 - Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg)
. – I voted in favour of this report to designate 2021 as the European Year of Rail. I welcome this designation as rail is a sustainable transport solution and should be promoted further by the EU. I hope that this focus on rail will encourage the Irish government to invest EU transport funding on rail for the West of Ireland.
Authorising the Commission to vote in favour of the capital increase of the European Investment Fund (A9-0253/2020 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
. – I abstained on this report, as I am cautious about facilitating a large increase in the EIF Capital given this will cost the Irish taxpayer.The Investment Fund can be useful especially in protecting SMEs during this Covid crisis although the primary work must be done by Member States. In reality the actual decision to increase capital subscriptions will take place when the Invest EU programme, which I am favourably disposed to, is formalised.
Additional resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: REACT-EU (A9-0150/2020 - Andrey Novakov, Constanze Krehl)
. – I abstained on this report.I am fully in favour of solidarity with other States and regions. I am careful though in simply allowing a very large increase in EU spending while the EU wastes so many resources on military and other projects that could be used on solidarity.I abstained because the immediate concern of us all must be tackling Covid-19 and I do not wish to prevent measures that aid that task. Questions must be asked too as to how Ireland stands to receive only EUR 89 million out of a EUR 40 billion increase in 2021.
Council regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 (A9-0260/2020 - Jan Olbrycht, Margarida Marques)
. – I voted against the report and MFF because I believe as a Budget it will not allow the type of EU Sinn Féin stand for.The priorities and the type of Europe envisaged in the Budget do not match Sinn Féin’s vision of the EU. The underpinning logic of the EU creating its own taxes to fund the budget is another major issue for Sinn Féin.Supporting this Budget would mean supporting EUR 7 billion for the arms industry and EUR 5.5 billion on the EU’s disgraceful border policies while Pillar II support (CAP) will be cut in real terms.Unfortunately, the priorities simply don’t match Sinn Féin’s progressive policies.By signing up to this MFF Irish parties are signing up to a roadmap that includes a Digital Tax and Financial Transition Tax as well as a ‘basket’ of other own resources.We do recognise the many positive things in the MFF including the solidarity aspect of the Budget, the climate goals, scientific research and the Just Transition Fund. We will continue to support these policies but cannot support a Budget whose priorities, direction and funding are not compatible with our goals.
Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction of new own resources (A9-0261/2020 - Esteban González Pons)
. – Although largely technical in nature, I voted against the Interinstitutional Agreement as it is predicated on the roadmap towards own resources. I do not agree with the moves to make the EU capable of raising its own revenue independent of the Member States.I do not subscribe to the principle that empowering the EU Parliament equates to greater democratic control as some supporters of the agreement do.
MFF, Rule of Law Conditionality and Own Resources (B9-0428/2020, B9-0429/2020)
Implementation of the Dublin III Regulation (A9-0245/2020 - Fabienne Keller)
Implementation of the Return Directive (A9-0238/2020 - Tineke Strik)
. – I abstained on this report about the return of asylum seekers. There are some positive points to the report (eg. regarding the protection of children) but it places too much of an emphasis on getting as many asylum seekers as possible out of the EU, regardless of international law and their rights as asylum seekers.
Rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (A9-0187/2020 - József Szájer)
. – The proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powersI supported this text as it improves the transparency of the comitology procedure. It will also require Member States take a position on the authorisation of new products or substances. This ends the situation where the Commission was making the final decision, which was a democratic deficit.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 (B9-0411/2020)
. – I supported this objection as a qualified majority of Member States do not support the authorisation, in the comitology process. In addition, it exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. I believe we must apply the precautionary principle, which would entail EFSA not green lighting any sub-combinations of stacked events unless they have been evaluated thoroughly.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × MON 87411 and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events MON 87427, MON 89034, MIR162 and MON 87411 (B9-0413/2020)
. – I supported this objection as a qualified majority of Member States do not support the authorisation, in the comitology process. In addition, it exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. I believe we must apply the precautionary principle, which would entail EFSA not green lighting any sub-combinations of stacked events unless they have been evaluated thoroughly.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MIR604 (SYN-IR6Ø4-5) (B9-0414/2020)
. – I supported this objection as a qualified majority of Member States do not support the authorisation, in the comitology process. In addition, it exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. I believe we must apply the precautionary principle, which would entail EFSA not green lighting any sub-combinations of stacked events unless they have been evaluated thoroughly.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 88017 (MON-88Ø17-3) (B9-0415/2020)
. – I supported this objection as a qualified majority of Member States do not support the authorisation, in the comitology process. In addition, it exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. I believe we must apply the precautionary principle, which would entail EFSA not green lighting any sub-combinations of stacked events unless they have been evaluated thoroughly.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 89034 (MON-89Ø34-3) (B9-0416/2020)
. – I supported this objection as a qualified majority of Member States do not support the authorisation, in the comitology process. In addition, it exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. I believe we must apply the precautionary principle, which would entail EFSA not green lighting any sub-combinations of stacked events unless they have been evaluated thoroughly.
European Citizens' Initiative - Minority Safepack (B9-0403/2020, B9-0405/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution, which was a response to a European Citizens Initiative (ECI) that secured over the required 1 million signatures. The aim of the ECI is for the EU to legislate for better protections for traditional minorities and languages.The resolution highlighted the growing racism, xenophobia or intolerance, directed at persons belonging to national and linguistic minorities and calls for the Commission and Member States to combat this. The resolution also called on the EU and its Member States to take account of the needs of national and linguistic minorities when designing its funding programmes.
A strong social Europe for Just Transitions (A9-0233/2020 - Dennis Radtke, Agnes Jongerius)
. – I voted in favour of this report. The purpose of this own initiative report is to make recommendations to the Commission and the Member States on how to progress on the Strong Social Europe for Just Transitions communication.The report is strong on homelessness and calls on the Commission to propose an EU framework for national homelessness strategies. In terms of workers’ rights, the report calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure fair and decent working conditions for mobile, cross-border and seasonal workers.
Sustainable corporate governance (A9-0240/2020 - Pascal Durand)
. – I voted in favour of the text. It proposed to raise the bar for non-financial disclosures. This would mean companies would be obligated to publish a sustainability strategy. This strategy would examine its performance in the areas of the environment, workers’ participation in decision-making and consideration of stakeholders.
Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience (B9-0400/2020)
. – In July 2020, the Commission published a proposal for a Council Recommendation on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience.This resolution itself focuses on how to make VETs more attractive, as currently many may view them as a less preferred option. It also highlights that COVID-19 could negatively impact places available for VETs, as many of them are practical courses that cannot be done remotely. Therefore I voted in favour of the resolution.
Union action for the European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 (A9-0201/2020 - Željana Zovko)
. – The two European Capitals of Culture 2020, Galway (Ireland) and Rijeka (Croatia) had to postpone or cancel several events since March 2020 without any clarity as to when or whether the situation will come back to normality, while still incurring costs for those events.In practice, they are prevented from implementing their year as a European Capital of Culture and capitalising on the huge human and financial investment made. I voted in favour of this proposal to continue implementing their cultural programmes until 30 April 2021.
New general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 (A9-0267/2020 - Pierre Larrouturou, Olivier Chastel)
. – I abstained on this report. I am generally not in favour of EU budgets that , like the MFF, spend far too much of taxpayers’ money on military and other wasteful or harmful projects.In 2021, the Covid tragedy will continue to impact our societies, so many of the emergency measures contained in this budget are necessary and I do not wish to block them. I particularly wish to welcome the addition resources to UNRWA budget that will aid the Palestinian people.The EU has now begun borrowing in its own name to fund its programmes. This is an unprecedented step and although tolerable in the context of the Covid emergency is not a direction Sinn Féin supports. The question of how this money is repaid is an open one but many in the EU want the EU’s so-called ‘own resources’, EU taxes, to be introduced to fund interest payments.
Basic road freight and road passenger connectivity at the end of the transition period with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union (C9-0399/2020 - Johan Danielsson)
Fishing authorisations for Union fishing vessels in United Kingdom waters and fishing operations of United Kingdom fishing vessels in Union waters (C9-0396/2020)
. – I voted in favour of these contingency measures to continue authorisation of fishing vessels in the case of a no-deal Brexit scenario. The is an extension of a vote from October 2019.In the absence of a withdrawal agreement, fishing activities by Member State vessels in waters under British jurisdiction and by British registered vessels in EU waters would no longer be governed by the Common Fisheries Policy and in the case of a no-deal Brexit, EU and British registered vessels risk suddenly not having the possibility to utilise fully the fishing opportunities.This is a proposal to extend the contingency measure adopted in October 2019, to 31 December 2021 or until the entry into force of an agreement.
Agreement for co-operation in dealing with pollution of the North Sea by oil and other harmful substances (Bonn Agreement): extension of its material and geographical scope of application (A9-0268/2020 - Pascal Canfin)
. – The Agreement for co-operation in dealing with pollution of the North Sea by oil and other harmful substances (Bonn Agreement) is a regional accord to protect the marine environment and the interests of the coastal states that are contracting parties. It focuses on combating pollution in the North Sea as well as on safeguarding coastal areas from maritime disasters and long-lasting pollution caused by ships and offshore installations.Through active co-operation and providing mutual assistance, the contracting parties to the Agreement carry out surveillance as an aid to detecting and combating pollution and to preventing violations of anti-pollution regulations.I supported this vote, which was on extending the scope of the agreement to the monitoring air pollution and combating unlawful air emissions caused by shipping and also on the entry of Spain into the agreement.
Exemption of certain third country spot foreign exchange benchmarks and the designation of replacements for certain benchmarks in cessation (A9-0227/2020 - Caroline Nagtegaal)
. – I supported this report.The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark is going to expire at the end of 2021. This rate underpins a lot of transactions and even legal contracts. This is an EU attempt to replace it.On balance, I think it is better to have at least some level of transparency in this very murky field and so supported the report.
Technical Support Instrument (A9-0173/2020 - Alexandra Geese, Othmar Karas, Dragoș Pîslaru)
. – I voted against this report. It is the mechanism to provide ‘technical assistance’ to countries in the spending of their recovery fund money.I see how some countries would accept such technical assistance, but the instrument is unfortunately to be used by the Commission to mainstream into recovery fund spending the aims of the EU Semester process.This agenda is in my view the wrong approach as it champions right-wing economic dogma over the necessary social focus for this fund.
Exercise of the Union's rights for the application and enforcement of international trade rules (A9-0133/2020 - Marie-Pierre Vedrenne)
. – I supported this report.The Unites States government are refusing to appoint a replacement to the WTO’s appeals panel. This means any decision can be appealed and any consequences avoided because there will be no appeal.The EU is trying to find a way around this. The EP have added social and environmental deals and not just goods to the regulation.This includes some Intellectual Property Rights, about which I am cautious given this is a national imperative.In light of Brexit it is in Ireland’s best interests to have a fully functioning WTO, notwithstanding the democratic issues with that body.
European Arrest Warrant and surrender procedures between Member States (A9-0248/2020 - Javier Zarzalejos)
. – I voted against this report as it should be primarily for national judicial systems to determine extradition cases. The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is too often used to detain people for frivolous purposes and runs the risk of sending people to countries with questionable safeguards. I particularly object to the way in which the report is used against the Catalan independence movement.
Strengthening the single market: the future of free movement of services (A9-0250/2020 - Morten Løkkegaard)
. – I voted against this report, as it focused on further opening of the market, for the benefit of big business. The report wants to open up further areas in Member States’ competencies to the EU free market, and criticises Member States for not doing so. The report also pushes to use the European Semester, which Sinn Féin opposes, to strengthen the internal market.
Achieving an effective policy legacy for the European Year of Cultural Heritage (A9-0210/2020 - Dace Melbārde)
. – 2018 was designated to be the European Year of Cultural Heritage by the Commission. Announced in 2017, it was officially launched on 31 January 2018. The report is strong on linguistic diversity and language rights. It highlights the importance of promoting sustainability and warns about the impact of pollution, vandalism, theft, poorly managed mass tourism, etc. The report also highlights how technology can be used to facilitate the preservation of culture and access to it, whilst also recognising the importance of protecting jobs. For these reasons I voted in favour.
Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law (A9-0001/2021 - Gilles Lebreton)
. – I voted against this report due to its heavy focus on using artificial intelligence for weaponry. Although it attempted to add some caveats to the utilisation, it failed to strongly condemn developments in the sector. Sinn Féin is very concerned about the development of autonomous weapons and increase in military drone use. On these issues, the role of the EU should be providing a critique of the arms race.
Revision of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) guidelines (A9-0251/2020 - Jens Gieseke)
. – I voted in favour of this own-initiative report ahead of the revision of the TEN-T network. I welcome that this report highlights the need for investments in sustainable transport, due to the severity of the climate crisis. I further welcome the emphasis of rail in the report and hope that EU transport will now go to the Western Arc and towards the re-instalment of the Western Rail Corridor.
Monitoring the application of EU law 2017, 2018 and 2019 (A9-0270/2020 -Sabrina Pignedoli)
. – I supported this report because it positively dealt with the implementation of money laundering legislation, non-implementation of agreements on refugees, media freedom, importance of EU petitions from citizens and the need to better tackle human trafficking. It is important to note, I do not support the Commission being involved in an EU tax system, and this should only happen based on a unanimous agreement between Member States.
Implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy - annual report 2020 (A9-0266/2020 -David McAllister)
. – I voted against this report. I disagree with the EU’s security and defence policy. This report contained such problematic positions as EU building strategic autonomy, military capacity building and increasing contributions of forces and assets. It also spoke positively of PESCO and a need to increase defence spending.
Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - annual report 2020 (A9-0265/2020 - Sven Mikser)
Human Rights and Democracy in the World and the EU policy on the matter - annual report 2019 (A9-0259/2020 - Isabel Santos)
FEAD: specific measures to address the COVID-19 crisis (A9-0174/2020 - Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová)
. – The Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) is the instrument that helps those who have fallen into poverty to take their first steps out of poverty and social exclusion. About 13 million people receive FEAD support annually, including approximately 4 million children under 15 years of age.The direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to increase in all Member States. This regulation is a response to the latest situation.As part of the coronavirus response investment initiative (CRII), which mobilises investment measures as an initial response to the pandemic, additional flexibility and liquidity has been made available under the European structural and investment funds, including FEAD. The trilogue agreement amends the current regulation in order to make this possible and thus mitigate the socioeconomic impact of the crisis on the most deprived. I therefore voted in favour.
Connectivity and EU-Asia relations (A9-0269/2020 - Reinhard Bütikofer)
. – I supported this report. It calls for greater connectivity with Asia on a sustainable basis. This means all cooperation must be built on respect for human rights, the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, the Green Deal and respect for citizen’s data. This connectivity will encompass not only infrastructure like roads, but also the movement of people like students.
Measures to promote the recovery of fish stock above MSY (A9-0264/2020 - Caroline Roose)
. – I voted in favour of this own initiative report, which aims to restore and maintain fish stocks above biomass levels capable of producing the maximum sustainable yield, i.e., theoretically, the maximum catch of a given species’ stock over an indefinite period. Among several recommendations, it builds on the idea of the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
The arrest of Aleksei Navalny (B9-0090/2021, B9-0091/2021, B9-0092/2021, B9-0093/2021, B9-0094/2021, B9-0095/2021)
. – I abstained on this report. I supported many aspects of this report, such as the condemnation of the poisoning of Mr Navalny, his recent arrest and the shrinking space for freedom of expression in Russia. However, I did not support this resolution because I have concerns about the EU’s response. The list of people to be sanctioned extends far beyond anyone directly involved the arrest of Mr Navalny. This includes the media and the family members of people linked to the Russian Government. The EU also wishes to increase support to Russian government dissidents and anti-government NGOs.Finally, it mentions building ties with the US against authoritarian regimes. I believe the combination of these measures will raise tensions considerably between Europe and Russia, with the final outcome being a stalemate which lasts for years to come. Russia must be held to account but this approach is unlikely to produce any kind of positive results for either side.
The latest developments in the National Assembly of Venezuela (RC-B9-0056/2021, B9-0056/2021, B9-0060/2021, B9-0062/2021, B9-0064/2021, B9-0065/2021)
. – I voted against this resolution. It proposed the EU should continue to recognise Juan Guaidó as the President of Venezuela. Mr Guaidó does not hold any parliamentary office in the country; he is a leader of an opposition party. Recognising him means not engaging with the present Government of Venezuela, without whom, no improvement in the country is possible.It is important to note that Josep Borrell, the EU foreign policy chief, said in an interview that the bloc still considered Guaidó to be an opposition leader and a critical figure in the effort to bring about new presidential elections in Venezuela. This statement illustrates Mr Borrell’s understanding of the need to deal with the reality of the situation in Venezuela, and political point scoring will not lead to any improvement of the situation.
Decent and affordable housing for all (A9-0247/2020 - Kim Van Sparrentak)
. – I voted in favour of this Own Initiative Report on the right to affordable housing for all.It is clear that there is a clear lack of adequate and affordable housing in Europe. Many Europeans are living in unhealthy, low quality, energy-poor or overcrowded spaces; or worse, facing eviction or homelessness. According to this report, there are 80 million people in the EU overburdened by housing costs. The report also calls for the decriminalisation of homelessness.
The right to disconnect (A9-0246/2020 - Alex Agius Saliba)
. – In the COVID-19 era, working from home is becoming more prominent. Flexible and remote working arrangements using digital tools, including ICT, have proved to be effective for business continuity in some industries and there has been a spike in the number of teleworkers and teleworkable solutions, which are expected to become increasingly common in the aftermath of the crisis.I voted in favour of this proposal which sets out to introduce minimum requirements on the use of digital tools for professional purposes outside working time, which over time aims at creating a culture that avoids out-of-hours contact.I was disappointed that an amendment which called for a three-year delay before the Commission takes any legislative action was carried, as I feel this is an unnecessary delay.
Reforming the EU list of tax havens (B9-0052/2021)
. – The use of tax havens, wherever they are, can mean multinationals and others avoid paying tax to countries anywhere in the world. These billions of euro could be used for public services and investments. We have seen profits at corporations and the individual wealth of the very wealthiest rise even as workers struggle in the COVID recession.We cannot have different rules for deciding on what constitutes a tax haven based on whether it is or outside the EU.I did not support explicitly or implicitly naming Ireland as a tax haven because I believe due process should be followed. This means holding Ireland and every country in the EU to the same standards we hold countries outside the EU. If this process determines Ireland is a tax haven, Sinn Féin will fully accept that determination.The time has come for Ireland to protect its reputation, stop enabling multinationals to avoid tax around the world, and to get our house in order.However, this resolution is problematic in calling for an EU-level corporate tax rate and using the EU’s country-specific recommendations as the basis of determining tax haven status so I abstained.
Mitigating the consequences of earthquakes in Croatia (RC-B9-0057/2021, B9-0057/2021, B9-0058/2021, B9-0059/2021, B9-0061/2021, B9-0063/2021)
The gender perspective in the COVID-19 crisis and post-crisis period (A9-0229/2020 - Frances Fitzgerald)
. – I voted in favour of this report, which highlights that the COVID-19 crisis and its consequences have gendered perspectives, with different outcomes for women than for men. The COVID-19 crisis has a harsher impact on women — the ramifications of teleworking need to be researched and evaluated, including the additional burden on women owing to the non-balance between teleworking, private life and caregiving responsibilities. The report emphasises the necessity of equal representation of women and men in leadership and the decision-making process, especially as we deal with the consequences of the COVID-19 crisis.
The EU Strategy for Gender Equality (A9-0234/2020 - Maria Noichl)
. – I voted in favour of the EU Strategy for Gender Equality. The EU gender equality strategy presents policy objectives and actions to make significant progress by 2025 towards a gender-equal Europe. The report highlights the need to end gender-based violence, challenge gender stereotypes, close gender gaps in the labour market, achieve equal participation across different sectors of the economy, address the gender pay and pension gaps, close the gender care gap and achieve gender balance in decision-making and in politics.
Closing the digital gender gap: women’s participation in the digital economy (A9-0232/2020 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
. – I voted in favour of this report, which addresses women’s participation in the digital economy. There is still a widespread gender gap in the STEM, digital and ITS fields. This includes the gender pay gap: women in the information and communications sector earn 19% less than men. The lack of women in the digital economy has widespread knock-on effects, with gender-discriminatory biases in algorithms, AI applications, videogames and toys, and other digital applications.
Establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (A9-0214/2020 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoș Pîslaru)
. – I abstained on the final vote as I have deep concerns about the RRF.I am disappointed at the poor return for Ireland from the fund and I dislike the conditionality attached that will further empower the EU Commission to direct the economic and budgetary choices of a country. I do appreciate that for many countries the RRF will bring a good level of very necessary investment at a very difficult time.Finally, I have great reservations about how this fund will be repaid. I am opposed to the proposed Own Resources that have been mooted as a means of repayment.
European Central Bank – annual report 2020 (A9-0002/2021 - Sven Simon)
. – I abstained on this report.This year’s report was very disappointing in many ways and failed to show how radical action by the ECB could help citizens’ lives.My amendment however on transparency in the ECB specifically regarding private meetings held by the Chief Economic passed with majority support. I hope the ECB takes heed of this demand for an end to these meetings.
New Circular Economy Action Plan: see Minutes (A9-0008/2021 - Jan Huitema)
. – I voted in favour of this own initiative report, which follows the New Circular Economy Action Plan that the Commission adopted in March 2020.The New Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP 2.0) is rooted in the climate goals agreed upon in the Green Deal and the Paris Agreement. While the first Circular Economy Action Plan of 2015 focused on the recyclability of products, this second one emphasises the preventive actions to undertake, specifically in waste prevention and management.
Implementation of the Anti-Trafficking Directive (A9-0011/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos)
. – I voted in favour of this own-initiative report, which assesses the implementation of the Anti-Trafficking Directive. I welcome that this report takes into account the gendered-dimension of human trafficking, which includes sexual exploitation, domestic servitude and forced marriage, and that the report calls for concrete action by the European Commission and Member States to combat the trafficking in human beings.
Implementation of Article 43 of the Asylum Procedures Directive (A9-0005/2021 - Erik Marquardt)
Public access to documents for the years 2016-2018 (A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan)
Reducing inequalities with a special focus on in-work poverty (A9-0006/2021 - Özlem Demirel)
. – I supported this own-initiative report which highlights that salaries are often insufficient to protect workers from poverty.This report highlights that the Commission's EU 2020 target of reducing the number of people at risk of poverty by 20 million has not been achieved and instead, inequality in the EU has increased both within and between Member States. The impending economic and social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic are stoking fears that these inequalities will become more acute.
The impact of Covid-19 on youth and on sport (B9-0115/2021)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution from the Committee on Culture and Education (CULT), which focuses on how the COVID-19 pandemic affects young people and sports. Specifically in terms of unemployment, low pay, working students and all the challenges and negative trends that they are facing because of the pandemic and with regard to sport. The resolution also highlighted the importance of supporting grassroots and amateur sports.
Markets in financial instruments (A9-0208/2020 - Markus Ferber)
. – I voted against this report as it forms part of a very reckless Commission agenda of deregulating the financial sector.I have grave concerns about this report’s impact on rules designed to prevent speculation on certain commodities, including foods. Oxfam have voiced concerns that these changes would remove important safeguards in EU financial regulation limiting financial speculation on essential commodities. These safeguards were introduced following the financial crisis of 2008 and the global food price crises of 2009-2011, which drove millions into poverty and hunger.
EU Recovery prospectus and targeted adjustments for financial intermediaries to help the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic (A9-0228/2020 - Ondřej Kovařík)
. – I rejected this report as it reduces investor protection and will add to financial instability. It is another part of the Commission’s deregulation agenda, stripping back financial regulation while using Covid as the excuse.We reject this agenda and have called it out.In this case the report allows for a roll-back on the regulation regarding prospectuses. A prospectus is a document that is prepared in advance of a major trade of securities giving all investors information in a transparent way. The report increases the threshold necessary to have a prospectus, the result will be less investor protection and potentially greater instability.
Slot utilisation rules at Union airports: temporary relief (C9-0420/2020)
. – I voted in favour of this report, which gives temporary relief to the slot utilisation rules at EU airports. Normally, airlines must use their airport slots at 80% capacity in order to avoid losing those slots. This legislation temporarily reduces the threshold to 40%. This is beneficial for the environment, as it prevents airlines from operating ‘ghost flights’ during the COVID—19 pandemic.
Temporary measures concerning the validity of certificates and licences (Omnibus II) (C9-0004/2021)
EU Association Agreement with Ukraine (A9-0219/2020 - Michael Gahler)
. – I voted against this text. It made very clear the EU has two aims for Ukraine: to bring it militarily closer to the EU and for it to deepen economic reforms, in favour of privatisation of the public sector. The text is very clear when it says, ‘regrets, furthermore, the increase in state-owned enterprises’, and ‘calls for the EU and Ukraine to boost cooperation in security and defence’. I strongly disagree with the EU’s agenda in this regard.
European Skills Agenda for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience (B9-0108/2021)
. – I supported this resolution which focused a lot on the green and digital transformation. The resolution highlighted the importance of providing active support to teachers and trainers by adopting an effective policy package to ensure that they are well prepared and upskilled for the digital and green transformation of schools and education institutions.
Challenges ahead for women’s rights: more than 25 years after the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (B9-0114/2021)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution, which marks 25 years since the Beijing Declaration. I welcome that this report stresses the importance of access to sexual and reproductive healthcare. I agree with the report’s calls for greater data collection by the EU regarding gender, racial and ethnic differences, in order to ensure the creation of intersectional policy-making. Gender-mainstreaming must take place in all EU legislation. I welcome the report’s calls for gender sensitive goals, target and indicators by the European Commission and Member States.
InvestEU Programme (A9-0203/2020 - José Manuel Fernandes, Irene Tinagli)
. – I supported this proposal, as I believe that investment is needed now more than ever in Europe. SMEs in particular stand to benefit from Invest EU. I also welcome the focus on social inclusion.The climate focus is not sufficient and I would have preferred to see more emphasis on the green revolution, although I note that at least 30% of investments will contribute to the EU objectives on climate action. I am disappointed too that the defence industry may benefit from this programme.
Programme for the Union's action in the field of health for the period 2021-2027 (“EU4Health Programme”) (A9-0196/2020 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
A WTO-compatible EU carbon border adjustment mechanism (A9-0019/2021 - Yannick Jadot)
. – I voted against this report primarily because it supports the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as an EU tax or ‘own resource’. Sinn Féin believe the revenue from any such taxes should be returned to the Member States. I await to see a formal proposal for a CBAM.The model suggested here of using the Emissions Trading Scheme is problematic as it relies on a market—based mechanism. I also regret the weakening of the link to the Paris Agreement target of 1.5c and the Parliament position of seeking ongoing exemptions.
Corporate due diligence and corporate accountability (A9-0018/2021 - Lara Wolters)
. – I am pleased to have had the opportunity to support this report. Essentially, the report is focussed on due diligence, this means that before companies engage in new practices, they must examine whether they would have negative impacts. Doing the analyses beforehand would result in averting harmful activities, rather than waiting for the negative impacts to mount before considering remedial action.All over the world, we see economic activity result in negative impacts for social rights, labour rights, the environment and good governance of states. It is time multinational companies took responsibility for these impacts, as many of these violations have become an essential part of their supply chain.
Implementation of the Construction Products Regulation (A9-0012/2021 - Christian Doleschal)
Equal treatment in employment and occupation in light of the UNCRPD (A9-0014/2021 - Katrin Langensiepen)
. – I voted in favour of this report on the implementation of Council Directive 2000/78/EC on establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation in light of the UNCRPD.The report highlights the difficulties that persons with disabilities face when accessing employment, and requests that Member States ensure the provision of reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities in the workplace.
Fisheries control (A9-0016/2021 - Clara Aguilera)
. – The proposed regulation amends five legislative files to revise the fisheries control system, focusing mainly in the Fisheries Control Regulation, with the supposed objective of updating measures and to adjust the control system to the revised Common Fisheries Policy.Proposals being made are to increase the scope of control measures (Such as via introduction of CCTV) and the range of the fleet, to which the measures are applied.Regarding the issue of CCTV on vessels, I support CCTV surveillance being introduced to super and factory trawlers in order to monitor them to ensure they comply with the rules imposed on them and do not engage in underreporting of catches. This needs to happen as an absolute priority, preceding an outright ban on these types of vessels.I abstained on the final vote because the sector has not been sufficiently kept informed and engaged with throughout the process and because Ireland currently does not have a penalty point system, as the system has been the subject of a number of court challenges.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Active substances, including dimoxystrobin (B9-0162/2021)
. – I supported this objection.Dimoxystrobin is an active substance that has been on the market since October 2006. It is widely used as fungicide in cereals, vegetables and turf crops and authorised in 15 Member States. However, since its approval in 2006, its effects on the environment and on human health have never been properly reassessed.Dimoxystrobin is considered to have endocrine-disrupting properties that may cause adverse effects in humans. Therefore, I supported this objection until a comprehensive study is done on the effects this substance can have on human and environmental health.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × T304-40 × GHB119 (B9-0160/2021)
. – I voted in favour of this file, which objected to the authorisation of Genetically Modified cotton. The authorisation of GM Cotton would allow it to be imported to the EU market. The authorisations are not supported by a qualified majority of Member States in the comitology process.The draft resolutions calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft implementing decisions, and not to authorise the import of any GM plants for food or feed uses, which have been made tolerant to a herbicide active substance that is not authorised for use in the Union, as they could pose a risk human and animal health and the environment.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MZIR098 (SYN-ØØØ98-3) (B9-0161/2021)
. – GM maize has been modified to confer tolerance to herbicides containing glufosinate. Studies show that glufosinate can severely impact the microbiome.Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 states that genetically modified (‘GM’) food or feed must not have adverse effects on human health, animal health or the environment. As there are concerns over the safety GM Maize, I supported this objection.
Activities of the European Ombudsman - annual report 2019 (A9-0013/2021 - Sylvie Guillaume)
. – I voted in favour of the annual report on the activities of the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is tasked with investigating maladministration in the EU institutions. The report highlights that the lack of transparency of the EU legislative process increases citizens’ distrust and weakens the legitimacy of the decision-making process as a whole.The report stresses the need for the EU institutions to maintain the maximum level of transparency and objectivity, so that citizens can follow and take an active part in the decision-making process in order to strengthen their trust in and feeling of proximity to the institutions.
European Semester: Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy 2021 (A9-0036/2021 - Markus Ferber)
. – I rejected this report as it seeks a return to the failed policies of the past, once the COVID crisis has ended. What is required is a radical reform of the fiscal rules and related processes, such as the EU Semester. Part of this reform should be restoring some budgetary decisions to Member State level.While the report does recognise the need for expansionary policies and suspension of the fiscal rules during the crisis, it fails to see any need for deeper reform. It fails to tackle the fundamental problems with the EU Semester process.
European Semester: employment and social aspects in the Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy 2021 (A9-0026/2021 - Lina Gálvez Muñoz)
. – I was pleased to support this positive report. It seeks a social realignment for the EU Semester process. I am doubtful that it can be achieved but many of the aims in the report are laudable. The emphasis on wages, childcare and fighting poverty would be welcome ways to improve the EU Semester process and Country Specific Recommendations. It also lays down some social conditions that would be needed before the fiscal rules re-enter into operation.
System of own resources of the European Union (A9-0047/2021 - José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer)
. – I voted in favour of this report as it should be seen as a technical exercise guaranteeing revenue for EU programmes like CAP. Sinn Féin is opposed to new own resources, so we were glad to see CCCTB and ETS these removed from this report. On the issue of plastic waste, I stated my position on that report (0048/2021) separately.
Shaping digital education policy (A9-0042/2021 - Victor Negrescu)
. – I voted in favour of this own initiative report, which highlighted a number of issues, such as 42 per cent of Europeans lack basic digital skills. It exposed significant disparities within and between Member States and based on socioeconomic status, age, gender, income, level of education and employment.For example, 35 per cent of people aged 55-74 possess basic digital skills, compared to 82 per cent of 16- to 24-year-olds, making older people more vulnerable to digital exclusion. The report recognises the role of parents in distance learning and emphasises the need to support parents and children with regard to distance learning, by providing them with the necessary digital infrastructure as well as technical and digital skills.
Impact on fisheries of marine litter (A9-0030/2021 - Catherine Chabaud)
. – I supported this own initiative report, which addresses the issue of marine litter. The report stressed the need to share best practices among all stakeholders, including citizens affected by the problem of marine waste. The report also called for support for the collection, by fishers, of lost fishing gear and other marine waste.
Cohesion Policy and regional environment strategies in the fight against climate change (A9-0034/2021 - Tonino Picula)
. – I voted in favour of this own-initiative report, which aims to give a regional perspective to the fight against climate change.The report highlights the need for local and regional authorities to make clear political commitments to achieving climate targets. It also stresses the need to step up multi-level dialogue among national, regional and local authorities on the planning and implementation of national measures on climate, direct access to funding for local authorities and monitoring the progress of the measures adopted.The report also calls for further investment in sustainable mobility, such as railways and sustainable urban mobility.For these reasons, I voted in favour.
General framework for securitisation and specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation to help the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis (A9-0215/2020 - Paul Tang)
. – I voted against this report as it a part of an agenda to empower vulture funds at the expense of workers, farmers and small businesses. This was a crucial vote on loosening regulation on securitisation. The Commission was clear that the aim was to encourage banks to sell non-performing loans to vulture funds and yet Fine Gael MEPs were alone among Ireland’s MEPs to back the proposals.It is widely predicted that the COVID-19 recession could bring about a new wave of mortgage arrears, especially because the Irish government has decided not extend moratoriums. Now we see Fine Gael and Commissioner McGuinness make it clear that if this happens their plan is simply to rely on vulture funds, regardless of the social cost.
Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards adjustments to the securitisation framework to support the economic recovery in response to the COVID-19 crisis (A9-0213/2020 - Othmar Karas)
. – I voted against this report as it a part of an agenda to empower vulture funds at the expense of workers, farmers and small businesses. This is a cold-hearted and cynical move designed to protect the capital of banks above the interest of society and working families, farmers and small businesses.
Control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use (A9-0390/2017 - Markéta Gregorová)
. – I voted in favour of this recast of the legislation governing dual use items. The amendments will improve the text in the areas of controlling cyber technology, the quantity of data and transparency required during export, linking items to possible human rights abuses, and allowing for further restriction of unlisted items.
Procurement in the fields of defence and security and transfer of defence-related products: implementation of relevant Directives (A9-0025/2021 - Andreas Schwab)
. – I rejected this own-initiative report on the internal market in ‘defence’. It was basically calling for more cooperation in buying weapons and a greater role for SMEs in the arms industry. You could argue it is calling for more transparency but overall it is about making the EU a bigger player in the weapons market, which is something that should be rejected out of hand.
Application of Regulation (EC) 2020/2092, the Rule of Law conditionality mechanism (B9-0206/2021, B9-0207/2021, B9-0208/2021)
Own resource based on non-recycled plastic packaging waste and certain aspects of the GNI-based own resource (A9-0048/2021 - José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer)
. – I abstained on the vote. I recognise that plastic waste is a major issue and that strong international measures are required to end this scourge. I disagree with the EU using revenue generated through this to fund itself. I believe the Member States should fund the EU along with traditional own resources. We should bear in mind that environmental taxes could be a victim of their own success. Were this tax to work as intended, it would be not a sustainable long-term source of revenue.
Guidelines for the 2022 Budget - Section III (A9-0046/2021 - Karlo Ressler)
Implementation of the Ambient Air Quality Directives (A9-0037/2021 - Javi López)
. – This implementation report analyses the shortcomings in the application of the EU air quality framework and gives recommendations to Member States and the Commission to improve air quality across Europe and globally.The report highlights that the COVID-19 pandemic is an example of the inextricable links between human health and ecosystem health. Among some of the recommendations is a call for Member States to improve their monitoring networks in order to reinforce the knowledge of the levels of pollutants existing in its territory. For those reasons, I voted in favour of this report.
New EU-Africa Strategy (A9-0017/2021 - Chrysoula Zacharopoulou)
. – Whilst I supported much of the content within this Own Initiative Report, such as parts highlighting the intolerable situation that some African countries are spending more money on debt repayments than on health services and a call to explore measures of repatriation and restitution of cultural artefacts of African origin, I was unable to support the calls for more cooperation with NATO and it’s positive sentiment towards the CSDP. For these reasons I voted to abstain on this report.
EU Strategy for Sustainable Tourism (A9-0033/2021 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
. – This Own Initiative Report deals with the crippling effect the COVID-19 pandemic has had on tourism.It makes a number of positive recommendations, including urging the Commission to introduce an EU hygiene certification seal. The report is critical that Next Generation EU does not include direct financing to the tourism industry and calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to include the tourism and travel sectors in their recovery plans and the REACT-EU initiative. The report also calls for a European framework for the protection of workers in the sector, in line with the action plan for the European Pillar of Social Rights, and therefore I voted in favour.However, I do not agree with its call for the Commission to set up a European Agency for Tourism in the next MFF. I believe tourism is a Member State competency, and should remain as such.
Strengthening the international role of the euro (A9-0043/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
. – I abstained on this report.Unfortunately, the final report saw the issue as only one to do with the Capital Markets Union and the euro as a geopolitical instrument. The potential downsides for workers and others ere downplayed, while the possible advantages were seized upon for other agendas I do not agree with.I am pleased the report recognised the potential role of the euro in the Six Counties post-Brexit. For this reason, I abstained.
Commission evaluation report on the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation two years after its application (B9-0211/2021)
. – I voted in favour of this report as it strongly upholds the GDPR, insists on strict enforcement, and seeks Commission action against those who are not doing so.While the procedure used for dealing with the Irish Data Protection Commission was not ideal, it should not be used as an excuse to evade criticism.
2019-2020 Reports on Albania (A9-0041/2021 - Isabel Santos)
. – I voted in favour of this report as it rightly highlights a number of areas Albania should improve on. These include, fighting corruption, LGBT rights, the protection of minorities and freedom of the press. It is important to highlight I disagree with requests in the text for Albania to mirror EU foreign affairs policy or move closer to NATO. I also disagree with references to a need to privatise public services. These decisions must not be undertaken under duress, imposed by the EU.
2019-2020 Reports on Kosovo (A9-0031/2021 - Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel)
. – I voted in favour of this report as it rightly highlights a number of areas Kosovo should improve on. These include, fighting corruption, LGBT rights, the protection of minorities and freedom of the press. It is important to highlight I disagree with requests in the text for Kosovo to mirror EU foreign affairs policy. I also disagree with references to a need to privatise public services. These decisions must not be undertaken under duress, imposed by the EU.
2019-2020 Reports on North Macedonia (A9-0040/2021 - Ilhan Kyuchyuk)
. – I voted in favour of this report as it rightly highlights a number of areas North Macedonia should improve on. These include, fighting corruption, LGBT rights, the protection of minorities and freedom of the press. It is important to highlight I disagree with requests in the text for North Macedonia to mirror EU foreign affairs policy or move closer to NATO. I also disagree with references to a need to privatise public services. These decisions must not be undertaken under duress, imposed by the EU.
2019-2020 Reports on Serbia (A9-0032/2021 - Vladimír Bilčík)
. – I voted in favour of this report as it rightly highlights a number of areas Serbia should improve on. These include, fighting corruption, LGBT rights, the protection of minorities and freedom of the press. It is important to highlight I disagree with requests in the text for Serbia to mirror EU foreign affairs policy or move closer to NATO. I also disagree with references for a need to privatise public services. These decisions must not be undertaken under duress, imposed by the EU.
EU/Norway Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0035/2021 - Jörgen Warborn)
EU/Honduras Voluntary Partnership Agreement (A9-0053/2021 - Karin Karlsbro)
. – I voted in favour of this agreement. It will allow Honduras sell the EU more timber, as long as it can be proved it is not linked to illegal logging. This is an important step in promoting sustainable forestry around the world, and is in line with the EU Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Action Plan.
Implementation report on the road safety aspects of the Roadworthiness Package (A9-0028/2021 - Benoît Lutgen)
. – I voted in favour of this Own Initiative Report, that is based on the implementation of the first EU Roadworthiness Package, which is to be revised in 2023.This Report contains several proposals to improve the current framework. The report called for the package to develop a system of obligatory requirements to increase the co-ordination at EU level of aspects such as cargo securing, information exchange and cooperation between the Member States.
Chemical residues in the Baltic Sea based on petitions 1328/2019 and 0406/2020 under Rule 227(2) (B9-0224/2021)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution, which concerns the at least 50 000 tonnes of conventional and chemical weapons containing hazardous substances (such as mustard gas, tear gas, and nerve and choking chemical agents) that have been dumped into the Baltic Sea since the end of the Second World War.The resolution emphasises that the chemical residue in the Baltic Sea is not only a regional or European issue, but a global one. It urges the international community to embrace the spirit of cooperation and solidarity and step up monitoring of dumped munitions and the risk they may pose to the marine environment.
Establishing Horizon Europe – laying down its rules for participation and dissemination (A9-0122/2021 - Dan Nica)
Specific Programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (A9-0118/2021 - Christian Ehle)
. – I was happy to support the EUR 100 billion Horizon Europe programme, which will help fund research and innovation in the coming years. I am particularly pleased that the programme will have a focus on the SME sector. I think this will be hugely beneficial to many Irish businesses. In the last term of this programme, Ireland received EUR 1.1 billion. With the increased budget for this term, I hope that this amount can be increased, and that SMEs across Ireland will benefit.I am glad the military agenda has been more or less removed from the programme. I would like to see it removed completely.
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (A9-0120/2020 - Marisa Matias)
. – I supported this report and commend the work of The Left MEP Marisa Matias. The European Institute of Innovation and Technology is a largely abstract body coordinating research projects across Europe.It is part of Horizon Europe and therefore needed to be reapproved by Parliament. The Left rapporteur Marisa Matias secured Parliament support for a position for triologues, and the proposal is to accept the triologue outcome, which I agree with.
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A9-0148/2020 - Nikos Androulakis)
. – I voted in favour of The Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), which is the EU programme that coordinates and supplements the actions of Member States, in the field of civil protection. Specifically, to prevent and prepare for and respond to natural and man-made disasters, within and outside the EU.The vote was on the result of the inter-institutional negotiations. The agreed UCPM proposal is that in order to deploy crisis relief more swiftly, the Commission will be able to directly acquire, under specific conditions, the necessary resources under rescEU.
EU/Honduras Voluntary Partnership Agreement (Resolution) (A9-0054/2021 - Karin Karlsbro)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution. It provides important messages to the Honduras Government, such as the need to fight corruption, consult indigenous communities, protect the environment and importantly protect the lives of environmental defenders, human rights workers and whistle-blowers.These areas must be improved, to provide a possible climate for further cooperation.
More efficient and cleaner maritime transport (A9-0029/2021 - Karima Delli)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Maximum residue levels for certain substances, including lufenuron (B9-0223/2021)
. – Lufenuron is a benzoylurea pesticide that inhibits the production of chitin in insects, and is used as a pesticide and fungicide.The objections notes that a recent scientific report concluded that lufenuron can induce teratogenic effects and histopathologic changes to the liver and kidney in rats, which suggests that pregnant women and their unborn children could be at risk. Therefore, I supported this objection.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Maximum residue levels for certain substances, including flonicamid (B9-0222/2021)
. – I supported this objection. Flonicamid is a selective, systemic insecticide that acts by disrupting insect feeding, movement, and other behaviours, resulting in starvation and dehydration followed by death.A doubt has been raised in relation to its safety for bees and other pollinators. Further research must therefore be provided before any authorisation of an increase to maximum residue levels. I will be contacting EFSA to get clarification of its intention to carry out this further testing.
The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (A9-0128/2021 - Andreas Schieder, Christophe Hansen)
. – I voted in favour of the agreement, as it avoids a cliff-edge, puts the relationship between Britain and the EU into a clear legal framework and protects Ireland from unfair competition by British companies.The Tory party choice of a hard Brexit is unfortunate ˗ a closer relationship would have been better for Ireland ˗ north and south. I hope that the TCA can be improved upon over the years, for the benefit of the people of Britain and Ireland.
The outcome of EU-UK negotiations (B9-0225/2021)
. – The resolution is very clear in its defence of the Good Friday Agreement and the peace process. It points to many of the weaknesses of the TCA – including the problems caused to fishing communities – and makes clear that this was the choice of the British Government. I am particularly pleased with its call for direct dialogue between the EU and political representatives of and civil society in the North, bypassing the often negative involvement of London.
Soil protection (B9-0221/2021)
. – I supported this resolution on soil protection. Soil, unlike water, air and nature, is not protected at EU level. This resolution supports a legal framework, at EU level, for soil protection and calls on the Commission to design an EU-wide common legal framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil. The resolution recognises that soil is estimated to remove up to 80 million tonnes of carbon per year in the EU, also playing a vital role for water management.
Digital Green Certificate - Union citizens (C9-0104/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
. – I voted in favour of the cautious opening up of travel by voluntary use of the Digital Green Certificate.The certificate should not be used for purposes other than travel and should not restrict Member States’ ability to take whatever public health measures necessary in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Personal data needs to be strictly limited and properly protected in line with the GDPR.I regret the failure of the European Parliament to broaden the certificate to include all WHO authorised vaccines and would urge Member States to do so.
Digital taxation: OECD negotiations, tax residency of digital companies and a possible European Digital Tax (A9-0103/2021 - Andreas Schwab, Martin Hlaváček)
. – I did not support this report as Sinn Féin do not agree with EU taxes as own resources, i.e., to directly fund the EU. Unlike others, we welcome the moves towards a global solution, including the work of the new US Administration. A global solution can help create a fairer tax system and help end the exploitation of the developing world, if done correctly.
European Defence Fund (A9-0120/2021 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
. – I voted against diverting billions of euros to the European arms industry through the European Defence Fund. Money that could have been used to help Member States deal with the consequences of Brexit or dealing with economic fall-out of the COVID pandemic are instead being used to support the increasing militarisation of the EU.
Parliament’s estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2022 (A9-0145/2021 - Damian Boeselager)
. – I supported this report and in particular welcome its focus on tackling the wasteful habit of moving the EP to Strasbourg. Before COVID-19, Parliament travelled to Strasbourg each month in a costly exercise, in terms of both money and carbon footprint. Having become an MEP only since the pandemic began, I’ve never been to Strasbourg and see no reason to go. MEPs have made it clear that staying in Brussels is the majority view of Parliament. Unfortunately, it would take action at government level to change the situation but it should happen.
European Child Guarantee (B9-0220/2021)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution on the European Child Guarantee, which highlighted the need to prevent and combat poverty and social exclusion. It aimed to do this by guaranteeing free and effective access for children in need, to key services such as early childhood education and care, educational and school—based activities and adequate housing.
EU-India relations (A9-0124/2021 - Alviina Alametsä)
. – I voted against this text. It promoted much deeper security and military cooperation between the EU and India. It also speaks about the EU having a strategic emphasis. This can only be interpreted as the EU attempting to increase its alliances with countries close to China. I believe EU foreign policy should be based on cooperation, peace promotion and mediation, not building up a network of military allies against its perceived enemies.I am also concerned by the mention of a standalone investor protection agreement. If it is anything like what we seen in the CETA Agreement, this is antidemocratic and will not protect EU or Indian citizens, but rather big business.
Just Transition Fund (A9-0135/2020 - Manolis Kefalogiannis)
Review of the European Union Solidarity Fund (A9-0052/2021 - Younous Omarjee)
Exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (Pericles IV programme): extension to the non-participating Member States (A9-0165/2021 - Clare Daly)
EU/Cuba Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0129/2021 - Gabriel Mato)
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement EU/Tunisia (accession of Croatia) (A9-0150/2021 - Michael Gahler)
Protocol to the EU/Central America Association Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A9-0148/2021 - Karol Karski)
Agreement EU/USA/Iceland/Norway: Time Limitations on Arrangements for the Provision of Aircraft with Crew (A9-0125/2021 - Maria Grapini)
Securing the objectives of the landing obligation under Article 15 of the Common Fisheries Policy (A9-0147/2021 - Søren Gade)
. – I voted in favour of this own initiative implementation report. The report calls for better use to be made of new technologies and digital solutions developed in cooperation with the fishing sector and Member States’ authorities to improve monitoring. The report places an emphasis on stakeholder engagement and therefore I voted in favour.
Common system of value added tax: exemptions on importations and on certain supplies, in respect of Union measures in the public interest (A9-0155/2021 - Irene Tinagli)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2020/002 EE/Tourism - Estonia (A9-0158/2021 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece and France in relation to natural disasters and to Albania, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain in relation to a public health emergency (A9-0157/2021 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Draft amending budget No 2/2021: financing the COVID-19 response and including refinements and updates related to the final adoption of the Multiannual Financial Framework (A9-0160/2021 - Pierre Larrouturou)
Challenges of sports events organisers in the digital environment (A9-0139/2021 - Angel Dzhambazki)
. – This resolution calls for a new law to facilitate the blocking of illegal streaming of sports events at EU level. I voted against this resolution because it is primarily about protecting business interests rather than the interests of citizens, presenting sport as an economic rather than a social activity and not addressing issues such as geoblocking and the high prices of legal streaming alternatives.
The impacts of climate change on vulnerable populations in developing countries (A9-0115/2021 - Mónica Silvana González)
. – This Own Initiative Report deals with the effects of climate change on developing countries. The text as it stands highlighted the forced displacement and violation of indigenous peoples’ rights. The report also calls for the reduction of general vulnerability through eradicating poverty and fighting inequality. The EPP Group submitted a number of successful amendments which weakened the overall text of the report and, therefore, I abstained.
Artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector (A9-0127/2021 - Sabine Verheyen)
. – I voted in favour of this own initiative report which examined the potential impact of AI on education, culture and the audio-visual sector. The report recognised that AI algorithms on streaming services could have a negative impact on linguistic and cultural diversity and therefore highlighted the need to ensure streaming platforms give a certain amount of prominence to European content.
A European Strategy for Energy System Integration (A9-0062/2021 - Christophe Grudler)
. – I voted in favour of this report, which aims to ensure a more efficient use of energy sources and reduce the amount of energy needed. It should help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in sectors that are more difficult to decarbonise for instance by using renewable electricity in buildings and road transport, or renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime, aviation, or certain industrial processes.
A European Strategy for Hydrogen (A9-0116/2021 - Jens Geier)
. – I abstained on this own initiative report on the future role of hydrogen in Europe’s energy system. The report had positive points on the need to increase renewable energy generation capacity, citizen engagement and worker retraining schemes. However, it also recognised a transition role for hydrogen made from fossil fuels (low-carbon hydrogen) and said that these types of hydrogen could be eligible for public funding. As continued fossil fuel dependence is not compatible with the goals of the Paris Agreement, I did not support the report.
Human rights protection and the EU external migration policy (A9-0060/2021 - Tineke Strik)
. – I voted in favour of this report. The report aimed to strengthen the link between human rights and how we manage migration. Human rights must be at the centre of this policy. The report was critical of the unlawful return of migrants to third countries, and it also cited the need for further supervision of Frontex. I am very concerned about the reported abuses by Frontex.
2019-2020 Reports on Turkey (A9-0153/2021 - Nacho Sánchez Amor)
. – I abstained on this report. Although it contained accurate criticism of Turkey, in relation to its actions in the Eastern Mediterranean, it makes very clear that it wants to urgently advance military cooperation with Turkey.I do not believe it should be an EU priority for Turkey to align itself to the Common Security and Defence Policy, and move closer to EU countries through NATO. This gathering of regional allies appears to be an attempt by the EU to strengthen itself, to face off against its perceived enemies. I believe the EU should be focused on promoting peace.
The effects of climate change on human rights and the role of environmental defenders on this matter (A9-0039/2021 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos)
. – I voted in favour of this report. It called on the Commission, Member States and EEAS to mitigate climate change and to integrate human rights into environmental policies. As for the latter, the report calls for increased efforts to protect environmental and human rights defenders, with a particular focus on Indigenous peoples, as well as to ensure accountability. This report is particularly important, given the continuous murder of community leaders in Colombia.
Impacts of EU rules on the free movements of workers and services: intra-EU labour mobility as a tool to match labour market needs and skills (A9-0066/2021 - Radan Kanev)
Accelerating progress and tackling inequalities towards ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 (B9-0263/2021)
. – I supported this resolution, which highlighted that health is a prerequisite for human development and calls on the Commission to prioritise health as part of the EU-Africa strategy. I was also pleased to see the passing of an amendment, co-signed by Sinn Féin, which called on the EU to support the Indian and South African World Trade Organization initiative for a temporary waiver on intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines, equipment and treatments.
Environment: The Aarhus Regulation (A9-0152/2021 - Christian Doleschal)
. – The Aarhus Convention establishes a number of rights of the public with regard to the environment so that they can contribute to environmental decision-making – access to environmental information etc. I voted in favour of this amending regulation, which aims to bring the European legislation in line with the requirements of the international convention, of which both the EU and Member States are signatories.
Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (RC-B9-0269/2021, B9-0269/2021, B9-0270/2021, B9-0271/2021, B9-0273/2021, B9-0274/2021, B9-0275/2021)
. – I abstained on this resolution. I am deeply opposed to the Chinese countersanctions on MEPs and others and of course to the shocking treatment of the Uyghur population by China.I abstained because the resolution was bellicose, and will only ratchet up tensions with China, at a time when dialogue must be the way forward. An endless spiral of sanctions and countersanctions will not help solve the very serious issues.
Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”) - Case C-311/18 (B9-0267/2021)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution, which concerned the ruling of the European Court of Justice of 16 July 2020 – Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems (‘Schrems II’). In 2013, Max Schrems filed a complaint to the Irish DPC about the data transfers by Facebook to the US. The resolution highlighted the importance of data protection and called on the Commission to proactively monitor the use of mass surveillance technologies in the United States, as well as in other third countries.
The right of information of the Parliament regarding the ongoing assessment of the national recovery and resilience plans (B9-0276/2021)
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights: interim report (A9-0058/2021 - Lukas Mandl)
. – I voted in favour of this interim report, which should influence the Council in its proposal to amend the Foundation Regulation of the FRA. The FRA should be able to produce opinions on legislative proposals at its own initiative. EU institutions should use the data produced by the FRA systematically in policy-making, and its budget should be increased.
Liability of companies for environmental damage (A9-0112/2021 - Antonius Manders)
New Avenues for Legal Labour Migration (A9-0143/2021 - Sylvie Guillaume)
Digital future of Europe: digital single market and use of AI for European consumers (A9-0149/2021 - Deirdre Clune)
The adequate protection of personal data by the United Kingdom (B9-0272/2021)
. – I would prefer to keep British laws broadly aligned with EU law, which they are at present. Denying equivalence would act as an incentive for them to diverge wildly, creating bigger problems in the future, particularly with regard to north-south data exchange in Ireland. Therefore, I voted in favour of the EPP/ECR motion to support the granting of equivalence and abstained on the joint motion, which contains important and fully-justified criticisms of the British government’s treatment of personal data but opposes granting equivalence.
ETIAS consequential amendments: police and judicial cooperation (A9-0254/2020 - Jeroen Lenaers)
ETIAS consequential amendments: borders and visa (A9-0255/2020 - Jeroen Lenaers)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2020/005 BE/Swissport – Belgium (A9-0188/2021 - Olivier Chastel)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2020/004 NL/KLM - Netherlands (A9-0187/2021 - Monika Vana)
. ‒ I supported this report as it allowed for the activation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for workers at KLM. I urge the Irish Government to monitor these requests to see if Irish workers who have been laid off could benefit from re-training through the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2020/007 FI/Finnair - Finland (A9-0186/2021 - Eero Heinäluoma)
. ‒ I supported this report as it allowed for the activation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for workers at FinnAir. I do not agree with corporate welfare of subsidising the sacking of workers but as the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund ultimately goes to the benefit of workers, I can support these requests.
ETIAS consequential amendments: ECRIS-TCN (A9-0083/2021 - Jeroen Lenaers)
EU Digital COVID Certificate - Union citizens (C9-0104/2021 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
This report eases travel without exceeding EU competence. It recognises that public health measures remain the responsibility of Member States.I would have liked to have seen the inclusion of vaccines not included by the EMA, but at least Member States are free to do so themselves.And I am pleased to see a sunset clause of 12 months.For these reasons I voted in favour.
Competition policy – annual report 2020 (A9-0168/2021 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
. ‒ I voted against this report, as it doesn’t envisage the type of changes to state aid/competition rules the Left stands for. It makes it clear the current exceptions allowing State investments should be limited in time and scope. The economy is still reeling from the hit of Covid19 and simply seeking a return to tight competition rules as soon as possible is the wrong approach.There are some good points like calling out multinationals for anti-consumer actions. It also calls for compatibility between competition rules and climate goals, although whether that is desirable or possible is a political decision. It is also good on the waivers issue.
EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives (A9-0179/2021 - César Luena)
. ‒ Commission’s Biodiversity Strategy. It highlights the urgency of the biodiversity crisis we are experiencing and outlines how it can be tackled, for example through protected areas, nature restoration, soil protection and proforestation. Despite some amendments on forestry that weakened the final text, it remains a strong report, reflecting the urgency and ambition needed to tackle biodiversity loss.
75th and the 76th sessions of the United Nations General Assembly (A9-0173/2021 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos)
I abstained on this resolution because it overly focussed on the EU acting as a block at UN level, diminishing the voice of individual Member States. Sinn Féin does not agree with the EU’s approach to foreign affairs, for example on militarisation. The UN offers Ireland an international forum to clearly set out its foreign affairs agenda, which is grounded in neutrality. We therefore do not agree with reducing Ireland’s voice here, in the interests of empowering an EU seat, which would likely not match our agenda.
Regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (A9-0174/2021 - Paulo Rangel)
The report strengthens the role of the Ombudsman, including more rights to initiate enquiries herself, to undertake enquiries based on whistleblowers (as well as maladministration with regard to the treatment of whistleblowers), and to deal with harassment cases. For these reasons I voted in favour.
Transitional provisions in order to address the impact of COVID-19 crisis (amendment of Regulation (EU) 2016/1628) (C9-0185/2021)
I voted in favour of this short-term extension of a deadline for the phase-out of certain engines in non-road vehicles. The COVID-19 pandemic has meant that engines which have already been built could not be placed on the market in time to meet the deadline. To mitigate the economic impact on producers and consumers, and to avoid waste, I supported this extension.
The conflict of interest of the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic (B9-0303/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which criticised the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic for failing to address his conflict of interest. Mr Babiš is the owner of Agrofert, an enterprise that has received large sums of money from the European Rural Development Fund, and the European Social Fund. It is not appropriate for a politician to be involved in the delivery of funds of which they are personally a recipient.
Meeting the Global Covid-19 challenge: effects of waiver of the WTO TRIPS agreement on Covid-19 vaccines, treatment, equipment and increasing production and manufacturing capacity in developing countries (RC-B9-0306/2021, B9-0306/2021, B9-0307/2021, B9-0308/2021, B9-0309/2021, B9-0310/2021, B9-0311/2021)
I was happy to vote in favour of this resolution, once the final text was amended to call for a TRIPS waiver that will allow countries around the world to ramp up vaccine production and ensure that there is global access to COVID vaccines and treatments as soon as possible. Corporate-led voluntary efforts have not enabled this so far. It is a positive step that the European Parliament, as the representative body of EU citizens, has joined over 100 countries in calling for a TRIPS waiver. The European Commission and governments like Ireland must now step up and ensure that vulnerable people are not left behind in this pandemic.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Maximum residue limit for imidacloprid (B9-0313/2021)
I supported this objection.Imidacloprid is an insecticide that acts as an insect neurotoxin and belongs to a class of chemicals called the neonicotinoids which act on the central nervous system of insects.A Commission Regulation bans the use of imidacloprid on all crops grown outdoors, because of its adverse effects on pollinators such as bees.The resolution is objecting to the establishment of an MRL for the insecticide in finned fish, such as salmon. The resolution highlights that the insecticide could have negative impact on our rivers and waterways and notes that the use of imidacloprid in Japan has led to a dramatic collapse of fish stocks, which have not yet recovered.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Active substances, including flumioxazine (B9-0312/2021)
I supported this objection.Flumioxazine is a light-dependent peroxidising herbicide. It is known to have a high risk of bio-concentration, and therefore can be toxic to algae and aquatic plants, earthworms, honeybees, fish and aquatic invertebrates.Flumioxazine was extended for five years by a Commission Directive 2010 and been subsequently approved by one year every year since 2015 by Commission Implementing Regulations. We believe that flumioxazine should not be automatically approved without comprehensive studies to identify any and all risks to human, animal and plant life.
The EU's Cybersecurity Strategy for the Digital Decade (B9-0305/2021)
Rule of Law situation in the European Union and the application of the conditionality regulation 2020/2092 (B9-0317/2021, B9-0319/2021, B9-0320/2021)
I supported this resolution as membership of the EU must entail protecting women’s rights, LGBT rights and the rights of minorities as well as sound and transparent financial governance.The Rule of Law mechanism cannot be ignored for political reasons where there are breaches of human rights in Member States.
European Parliament’s Scrutiny on the ongoing assessment by the Commission and the Council of the national recovery and resilience plans (RC-B9-0331/2021, B9-0331/2021, B9-0333/2021, B9-0334/2021, B9-0335/2021, B9-0337/2021, B9-0338/2021)
I supported this resolution as I am deeply concerned at measures to allow secrecy and privacy in the adoption of the National Recovery and Resilience Plans. The National Plans involve the spending of hundreds of millions of public money. This money must be spent transparently. There is no excuse for any secrecy or privacy clauses.I do not however support the link between the EU Semester process and the national plans.
Human rights and political situation in Cuba (B9-0341/2021, B9-0342/2021, B9-0343/2021, B9-0345/2021, B9-0346/2021)
I voted against this resolution on Cuba. The resolution was terribly unbalanced. It failed to mention the crippling impact of the blockade imposed by the United States, the tremendous role played by Cuban doctors in Europe during the pandemic, and Cuba’s impressive response to protect its citizens during the pandemic. It also included false claims of slavery.I believe this resolution was an attempt to damage relations between the EU and Cuba. I would like to see more engagement between the EU and Cuba. I fully support conversations on human rights and freedom of expression with any country, robust debate is healthy, but that was not the genuine agenda of this resolution.
Systematic repression in Belarus and its consequences for European security following abductions from an EU civilian plane intercepted by Belarusian authorities (B9-0328/2021, B9-0330/2021, B9-0332/2021, B9-0339/2021, B9-0340/2021, B9-0344/2021)
The situation in Afghanistan (B9-0321/2021, B9-0324/2021, B9-0325/2021, B9-0326/2021, B9-0327/2021, B9-0329/2021)
European Citizens' Initiative "End the cage age" (B9-0296/2021, B9-0302/2021)
I supported this resolution. I believe we should be transitioning away from caging animals for their whole lives. This transition must include final support for farmers to move to barn or free-range models. 1.4 million EU citizens signed a petition to begin this initiative. The resulting progress should be viewed as democracy in action.
Promoting gender equality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education and careers (A9-0163/2021 - Susana Solís Pérez)
I voted in favour of this report which outlines the challenges faced by women and girls studying and working in STEM fields, and calls on EU Member States and the European Commission to adopt policies and programmes that support women and girls to study and take up careers in STEM areas. Special attention is given to marginalised groups and those living and working in rural areas. The report underlines the hugely important role that women have to play in the STEM fields and the multiple benefits of their engagement with STEM subjects, both for their own well—being and for wider society.
Future EU financing of the radio network Euranet Plus (B9-0316/2021)
I supported this resolution.Euranet Plus is composed of 13 leading public and private broadcasters within the European Union reaching more than 15 million listeners in a daily cumulated reach.In January, the Internal Market Commissioner informed the EP that the grant agreement with Euranet Plus would not be renewed and would be replaced by a competitive annual call for proposals.The resolution calls for the current core funding to be renewed in the form of a transitional grant agreement for at least two years to enable Euronet Plus to develop a long—term strategic plan to develop the network further, with a view to expanding its membership and geographic and linguistic coverage.
Conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO) (Isabel Carvalhais - A9-0220/2020)
Regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (A9-0174/2021 - Paulo Rangel)
EU/Thailand Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0180/2021 - Heidi Hautala)
EU/Indonesia Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0182/2021 - Heidi Hautala)
EU/Argentina Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0175/2021 - Jordi Cañas)
Challenges and opportunities for the fishing sector in the Black Sea (A9-0170/2021 - Ivo Hristov)
. ‒ I supported this own initiative report, which deals with the fishing sector in the Black Sea. The report mainly focused on the two EU Member States in the area, Bulgaria and Romania, and called for further measures to support the collection and processing of scientific data and stressed the need for local and regional communication cooperation within the different Black Sea littoral states in order for there to be a common and coherent approach to the management of the fish stock.
The role of the EU's development cooperation and humanitarian assistance in addressing the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (A9-0151/2021 - Hildegard Bentele, Norbert Neuser)
. ‒ This own initiative report focused on the EU’s response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Among other things, the report highlighted that the pandemic risks triggering a humanitarian crisis and therefore emphasised the need to provide humanitarian assistance.Whilst I supported much of the content in the report, I was unable to vote in favour of it as a whole as it omitted any call for the TRIPS Waiver, which has already been endorsed by the parliament on two separate occasions. I therefore abstained.
European Climate Law (Jytte Guteland - A9-0162/2020)
. ‒ The EU urgently needs to increase its 2030 targets and increase the ambition of its climate policies accordingly. However, the final agreement reached on the Climate Law is not adequate. The compromise target of net 55% emissions reduction is far below what is required if the EU is to meet its commitments under the Paris Agreement, and below the 60% target which Parliament had called for. Furthermore, the target only applies at EU level, whereas obligations at Member State level are also needed to keep Member States accountable for acting on climate change. For these reasons I voted against the Climate Law, and will work to ensure that the Fit for 55% package reflects the level of ambition required by climate science and our international commitments.
European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (A9-0177/2021 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
. ‒ The High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking is an EU-wide public-private partnership founded in 2018, establishing a legal and financial framework for research, development, use of and access to supercomputers. The proposed regulation seeks to extend this undertaking and allow it to avail of funding under the new EU budget. The report made some good additions on gender equality, energy efficiency, supporting SMEs and civil society involvement in governance. However, while the Undertaking should primarily be used for civilian uses, it can be used for defence and security purposes as Member States deem necessary. For this reason, I abstained on this vote.
Commission’s 2020 Rule of law report (A9-0199/2021 - Domènec Ruiz Devesa)
I supported the report on the Commission’s 2020 Rule of Law report (RUIZ DEVESA report).It is essential that Member States uphold the highest standards in human rights and democratic standards. Unfortunately, some Member States are consistently failing to adhere to these standards. Such failings should not be tolerated. A free press and thriving civil society are important parts of a democratic life and should be monitored and reported upon.
Sexual and reproductive health and rights in the EU, in the frame of women’s health (A9-0169/2021 - Predrag Fred Matić)
This report calls for the EU to promote, raise awareness and safeguard Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR), including access and information on contraception, abortion, family planning and fertility treatment. I voted in favour of this report, which has many positive points, e.g. highlighting period poverty, calling for comprehensive and inclusive sex ed., highlighting obstetric violence and calling for better maternity care. It outlines the barriers LGBTI+ people face when accessing SRHR and what structures need to be adapted to make sure they have access to these rights. There were a small number of paragraphs in the report on the conscience clause for medical practitioners. Sinn Féin supports the conscience clause for individual practitioners, as it currently exists in Ireland, whereby doctors exercising conscientious objection are required to refer patients on to another practitioner who will provide abortion services.Our policy reasserts that abortion should be available where a woman’s life, health or mental health is at risk and in cases of fatal foetal abnormality, and accepts that abortion without specific indication should be available through a GP-led service in a clinical context as determined by law and licensing practice for a limited gestational period.
25th anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD25) (Nairobi Summit) (B9-0365/2021, B9-0366/2021)
Regulatory fitness, subsidiarity and proportionality - report on Better Law Making 2017, 2018 and 2019 (A9-0191/2021 - Mislav Kolakušić)
I supported this report. The report stressed that the Commission must do more to apply subsidiary and proportionality. In particular, it speaks about ensuring that citizens and regional and national parliaments are consulted from the start. It also reminds the Commission of its commitment to apply the ‘one in, one out’ rule. This means that every time a new burden is placed on SMEs, a different burden must be removed one way or another. This report calls for more impact assessments, more consultation and more restraint in action when it could be taken at national level. Sinn Féin believes as many decisions as possible should be made as close as possible to the citizens affected.
2019-2020 Reports on Bosnia and Herzegovina (A9-0185/2021 - Paulo Rangel)
I voted in favour of this report. It dealt with the areas Bosnia and Herzegovina must improve on before advancing further in the accession process; these include judicial reform and tackling corruption. It is important to note that I do not agree with the commentary on NATO and the Common Security and Defence Policy. The EU should not be about building military alliances.
Use of technologies for the processing of data for the purpose of combating online child sexual abuse (temporary derogation from Directive 2002/58/EC) (A9-0258/2020 - Birgit Sippel)
Indiscriminate scanning of private communications constitutes mass surveillance. It effectively ends encryption for legitimate purposes without any guarantee as to its effectiveness. The scanning of all communications is legally dubious (as pointed out by the European Data Protection Supervisor) and almost certainly breaches the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. For these reasons I voted against the proposal.
Recognition of third countries certificates in inland navigation (A9-0210/2021 - Andris Ameriks)
I voted in favour of this legislation. It is a transition provision allowing Member States to accept documents from third countries until 18 January 2023, even though the date of transposition of the Directive is 17 January 2022. The documents covered are certificates of qualification, service record books and logbooks issued by third countries. This will ensure there will be no disruption to workers.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (A9-0227/2021 - Lukas Mandl)
I hoped for a more comprehensive and ambitious revision of the FRA Regulation in line with Parliament’s interim report. However, the text agreed by the Council will enable the agency to become active on its own initiative in important fundamental rights areas such as internal security and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. It will also add to the agency’s independence and agility through the abolition of the Multiannual Framework. For these reasons I voted in favour.
Interbus agreement: Protocol on international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (A9-0176/2021 - Maria Grapini)
I voted in favour of this proposed Protocol, which extends the Interbus Agreement to international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus, without amending or repeating the common rules of the main Agreement. In order to conclude the Protocol to the Agreement the Council needs the consent of the Parliament.
Internal Security Fund (A9-0221/2021 - Monika Hohlmeier)
European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (A9-0222/2021 - Gabriel Mato)
I supported the rejection amendment to this file as the agreement did not include Parliament’s position in relation to support for the Irish islands. In 2019, Parliament supported an amendment for the Irish islands, which was not included in the final text. I also supported the rejection of this file as the overall budget had been cut.
Railway safety and signalling: Assessing the state of play of the ERTMS deployment (A9-0181/2021 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
Trade related aspects and implications of COVID-19 (A9-0190/2021 - Kathleen Van Brempt)
I voted in favour of this report, which takes stock of EU trade during the COVID-19 pandemic. The report contains many positive suggestions, inspired by lessons learned from the pandemic. These include a focus on more mandatory diligence, a call for the Commission to come up with concrete ways to tackle child labour, and a shortening of supply chains, making them more sustainable, inclusive and green.
Common system of value added tax: conferral of implementing powers to the Commission to determine the meaning of the terms used in certain provisions (A9-0201/2021 - Irene Tinagli)
Financial activities of the European Investment Bank - annual report 2020 (A9-0200/2021 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank - annual report 2019 (A9-0215/2021 - Bas Eickhout)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): genetically modified soybean DAS-81419-2 (B9-0372/2021)
I voted in favour of this objection against the authorisation of the sale of GMO soybeans on the EU market. These soybeans are resistant to herbicides shown to be harmful to humans; their cultivation can lead to an increased use of these herbicides and therefore greater exposure of farmers around the world to these substances. These soybeans also have insecticidal properties, which can lead to increased insect resistance. Neither of these aspects were considered by the European Food Safety Authority when they assessed these soybeans. What is more, increased yields from GMO crops cause increased deforestation, e.g. in South America. There are also major social concerns over the increased dependence of farmers in the Global South on patented GMO seeds.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean DAS-81419-2 × DAS-44406–6 (B9-0373/2021)
I voted in favour of this objection against the authorisation of the sale of GMO soybeans on the EU market. These soybeans are resistant to herbicides shown to be harmful to humans; their cultivation can lead to an increased use of these herbicides and therefore greater exposure of farmers around the world to these substances. These soybeans also have insecticidal properties, which can lead to increased insect resistance. Neither of these aspects were considered by the European Food Safety Authority when they assessed these soybeans. What is more, increased yields from GMO crops cause increased deforestation, e.g. in South America. There are also major social concerns over the increased dependence of farmers in the Global South on patented GMO seeds.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize 1507 × MIR162 × MON810 × NK603 and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events 1507, MIR162, MON810 and NK603 (B9-0374/2021)
I voted in favour of this objection against the authorisation of the sale of GMO maize on the EU market. This maize are resistant to herbicides shown to be harmful to humans; its cultivation can lead to an increased use of these herbicides and therefore greater exposure of farmers around the world to these substances. This maize also has insecticidal properties, which can lead to increased insect resistance. Neither of these aspects were considered by the European Food Safety Authority when they assessed this maize. What is more, increased yields from GMO crops cause increased deforestation, e.g. in South America. There are also major social concerns over the increased dependence of farmers in the Global South on patented GMO seeds.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize Bt 11 (SYN-BTØ11-1) (B9-0375/2021)
I voted in favour of this objection against the authorisation of the sale of GMO maize on the EU market. This maize are resistant to herbicides shown to be harmful to humans; its cultivation can lead to an increased use of these herbicides and therefore greater exposure of farmers around the world to these substances. This maize also has insecticidal properties, which can lead to increased insect resistance. Neither of these aspects were considered by the European Food Safety Authority when they assessed this maize. What is more, increased yields from GMO crops cause increased deforestation, e.g. in South America. There are also major social concerns over the increased dependence of farmers in the Global South on patented GMO seeds.
Protection of the EU’s financial interests - combatting fraud - annual report 2019 (A9-0209/2021 - Caterina Chinnici)
The impact on the fishing sector of offshore windfarms and other renewable energy systems (A9-0184/2021 - Peter van Dalen)
. ‒ I supported this own initiative report which addresses the impact on fisheries of the installation of offshore renewable energy infrastructures, namely within the framework of the targets for offshore wind energy capacity set by the Commission in the European Green Deal. The report emphasises that offshore renewable energy should be deployed in such a way as to create opportunities for other activities, through an environmental, social and economic co-benefits approach, ensuring benefits for fishers and local communities. The report also calls on Member States to designate specific historical and traditional fishing grounds of local fishers as areas that are to remain free of offshore renewables.
Connecting Europe Facility (A9-0219/2021 - Henna Virkkunen, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Dominique Riquet)
. ‒ I voted to support the agreement on the Connecting Europe Facility agreed between the European Parliament and the Council. There are issues with the agreement, notably the eligibility of ‘dual use’ transport projects for EU funding; projects designed to serve military and border security purposes. I also deeply regret that the West Coast Rail Link is no longer included as a priority corridor eligible for funding. However, as it is not possible to get the West Coast Rail Link re-inserted at this stage, and as the Connecting Europe Facility is an important potential funding source for other Irish projects, I voted against the rejection of the agreement.
Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (A9-0229/2021 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
Visa Information System (VIS): visa processing (A9-0207/2021 - Paulo Rangel)
I voted against this report which extends the Visa Information System (VIS) to include the data of all third country nationals (TCN) who have long-stay visas or residence permits in the EU. It becomes a sort of ‘central registry for foreigners’. The report creates additional risks in the reinforcement of the provisions for the use of the VIS for law-enforcement purposes and its interoperability with all the large-scale databases relating to border management and home affairs issues for various purposes, which can directly harm TCNs’ rights.
Visa Information System (VIS): conditions for accessing other EU information systems for VIS (A9-0208/2021 - Paulo Rangel)
I voted against this report, which extends the Visa Information System (VIS) to include the data of all third country nationals (TCN) who have long-stay visas or residence permits in the EU. It becomes a sort of ‘central registry for foreigners’. The report creates additional risks in the reinforcement of the provisions for the use of the VIS for law enforcement purposes and its interoperability with all the large-scale databases relating to border management and Home Affairs issues for various purposes, which can directly harm TCNs’ rights.
Citizens’ dialogues and citizens’ participation in EU decision-making (A9-0213/2021 - Helmut Scholz)
EU-NATO cooperation in the context of transatlantic relations (A9-0192/2021 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
I voted against this report. This report was about promoting the strengthening of NATO, for example in EU candidate countries. As a neutral country, Ireland should not be supporting any report that calls for the strengthening of military alliances, in particular when small countries may then feel pressured to join these alliances, as a way of pleasing the EU.
Old continent growing older - possibilities and challenges related to ageing policy post 2020 (A9-0194/2021 - Beata Szydło)
This Own Initiative Report on Europe's aging population had many positive aspects, however it contained some contradictory language on the subject of the retirement age.Sinn Féin supports the right to retire at the age of 65, and as this report was not robust enough on that topic, I voted against this report.
The creation of guidelines for the application of the general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (A9-0226/2021 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Petri Sarvamaa)
EU global human rights sanctions regime (EU Magnitsky Act) (B9-0371/2021)
I abstained on this resolution. I understand the need to take action against human rights offenders. However, I am concerned by references to the sanction regime mirroring EU foreign affairs policy. This mechanism should not just be deployed against the EU’s perceived enemies. If it is genuinely about human rights, it must be applied uniformly to human rights offenders, regardless of whether they are EU allies or enemies. This is why the recommendation board needs to be independent and working closely with civil society, otherwise it will descend into political point scoring.
Annual Report on the functioning of the Schengen area (A9-0183/2021 - Tanja Fajon)
I voted in favour of this annual report on the state of play of the functioning of the Schengen area. Due to the pandemic, the functioning of this area has been put under great pressure. The report covers the already existing shortcoming and flaws of the Schengen area, the extra tensions due to the pandemic and it makes policy recommendations for the future.
European Medicines Agency (A9-0216/2021 - Nicolás González Casares)
I voted in favour of this proposal to strengthen the role of the European Medicines Agency in contributing to managing health crises, specifically on the supply of medicines and medical devices. While the field of health is primarily a Member State competence, the Covid-19 pandemic has shown us how the coordination of medical supplies at EU level can be the best use of resources for guaranteeing access to medicines and treatments. The overall tone of the proposal suggests a need for more control of pharmaceutical supply chains, to ensure that people’s health does not take second priority to business decisions. The ENVI Committee of the European Parliament added several good elements to the text which seek to better hold pharmaceutical companies responsible for ensuring medicine supplies.
General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030 (A9-0203/2021 - Grace O'Sullivan)
The Environment Action programme is a framework to coordinate and set direction for the EU’s environmental policy. I was happy to vote in favour of this report, which made many positive improvements to the Commission’s original proposal, putting the ‘action’ back into the Action Programme. The report also had some very good language on moving away from GDP and growth-oriented approaches.
A new ERA for Research and Innovation (B9-0370/2021)
This report welcomed the Commission’s communication about the creation of a new European Research Area for Research and Innovation, which aims to prioritise R&I investments, improve access to research facilities, better link economy and research for market uptake of ideas, and increase the mobility of researchers. It had many positive points on not linking fundamental research to profitability, open science practices and results sharing, academic freedom, collaboration with low- and middle-income countries, women in STEM, civil society involvement and work-life balance for researchers. However, I abstained on this report as it did not include guarantees ensuring that the public fully benefits from publicly funded research. In the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, with the ongoing debate about fair, global access to treatments and vaccines, any discussion of research and innovation which does not cover these topics is incomplete.
Review of the macroeconomic legislative framework (A9-0212/2021 - Margarida Marques)
I voted against this report as, unfortunately, it is unambitious in terms of the kind of reform needed for fiscal rules. It is widely recognised, in the new reality of increased debt, that restoring the rules would be a disaster. There is an opportunity for radical reform that this report wishes to skip over.
Situation in Nicaragua (RC-B9-0400/2021, B9-0400/2021, B9-0401/2021, B9-0402/2021, B9-0403/2021, B9-0404/2021, B9-0405/2021)
I abstained on this resolution. I am concerned by the series of arrests in recent weeks. I call on the Nicaraguan government to ensure each person detained receives due process and the process is free from political interference.I abstained because the text clearly had the intention of creating an atmosphere where it will not recognise the November election. I think this is an unfair interference, at this stage, given it may affect how people vote. I also have my doubts about the impartial nature of the cooperation, called for in the resolution, with the United States. This will likely end in the freezing of assets of many Nicaraguan companies, vaguely deemed ‘collaborators’, by the EU and US. This is an overly arbitrary legal test.
The repression of the opposition in Turkey, specifically HDP (RC-B9-0406/2021, B9-0406/2021, B9-0407/2021, B9-0408/2021, B9-0409/2021, B9-0410/2021, B9-0411/2021)
Establishment of Antarctic Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and the conservation of Southern Ocean biodiversity (B9-0369/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution on the establishment of Marine Protected Areas in the Antarctic and the conservation of Southern Ocean biodiversity. The resolution highlighted how illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing can have a devastating effect on the environment and the fishing sector, and it also highlighted that tourism in the Antarctic must be conducted in a sustainable way.
Breaches of EU law and of the rights of LGBTIQ citizens in Hungary as a result of the adopted legal changes in the Hungarian Parliament (B9-0412/2021, B9-0413/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which calls on the European Commission and Member States to take relevant legal action against Hungary’s new discriminatory law, which aims to stigmatise and sideline LGBTIQ+ people. As an EU Member State, Hungary has a duty to respect the fundamental values of the EU, which include equal treatment and protection from discrimination for all people, regardless of their sexual orientation, gender identity or sex characteristics. The discriminatory texts were included in a law for the protection of children, but criminalising the depiction of LGBTI+ people, and depriving LGBTI+ young people of comprehensive sex education relevant to their needs will in fact be hugely damaging for the mental and sexual well—being of these children and young people.This is not an isolated incident but rather is part of a pattern of discrimination against LBGTI+ people by the Hungarian Government. The EU must take a stand in defence of the rights of LGBTI+ people, through full use of the legal means available.
Community plant variety rights: extension of the term for certain varieties (A9-0171/2021 - Bert-Jan Ruissen)
Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union (A9-0244/2021 - Tomas Tobé)
This vote is on the Commission submission to the Council for a Council Decision on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other.The Council Decision establish the rules and procedures governing the EU’s association with the OCTs, including Greenland, for the period 2021-2027. Much of what is in this agreement is quite positive, including increases for climate targets from 20% to 25% and includes strengthened language on the protection of nature and the environment. I therefore voted in favour.
LGBTIQ rights in the EU (B9-0431/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution which calls for legal coherence in EU Member States to ensure that there is no discrimination against rainbow families (families with LGBTIQ parents) in terms of their rights to freedom of movement. It calls on Member States to recognise same-sex marriages and family arrangements which are legal in other MSs, including the legal gender of transgender parents. This resolution came off the back of several petitions to the European Parliament, where families described the barriers they face in exercising their rights to freedom of movement. This is one of the basic rights of EU citizens and their families, and should not be denied to families based on sexual orientation, gender identity or sex characteristics. All families are entitled to equal levels of legal protection when travelling, living and working in the EU.
Towards future-proof inland waterway transport in Europe (A9-0231/2021 - Caroline Nagtegaal)
Towards a stronger partnership with the EU outermost regions (A9-0241/2021 - Stéphane Bijoux)
I voted in favour of this own-initiative report which focused on the outermost regions (ORs). The report highlighted the importance of the blue economy, and the need to protect ORs when concluding fisheries agreements with third countries. The report also stressed the need to focus on sustainable tourism by supporting innovative pilot projects to promote greener and digital solutions.
A new approach to the Atlantic maritime strategy (A9-0243/2021 - Younous Omarjee)
I supported this own-initiative report on the Atlantic strategy. One of the most positive aspects of the report was the strong emphasis placed on sustainable fisheries, warning against the harmful impacts of overfishing. This highlights how marine protected areas protect marine ecosystems and play a role in climate mitigation.
Extension of validity of safety certificates and licences of railway undertakings operating in the Channel tunnel (C9-0314/2021)
I voted in favour of this text. It extends the recognition of British train drivers’ licences and train safety certificates when they arrive in France, until a final agreement is reached. The new deadline for an agreement is 31 March 2022, up to which date no complications will occur, as a result of the agreement.
Official controls on animals and products of animal origin in order to ensure compliance with the prohibition of certain uses of antimicrobials (A9-0195/2021 - Pascal Canfin)
I voted in favour of this technical correction to allow the rules on the use of antimicrobials contained in the Veterinary Medicinal Products Regulation to be applied to imports of animals or products of animal origin to the EU. These rules are important in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, which is a major public health concern. The EU is a forerunner in setting strict standards for antimicrobial use, and particularly in applying them to imports. This could then drive action on antimicrobial overuse around the world.
Brexit Adjustment Reserve (A9-0178/2021 - Pascal Arimont)
I welcome today’s passing of the EUR 5 billion Brexit Adjustment Reserve by the European Parliament. Ireland’s share of approximately EUR 1 billion must be focused on where Brexit has had and will have the biggest impact – the border regions.Although the deal is not as good for Ireland as the original proposal, it still represents a symbolic act of solidarity.I will be working to ensure that the State’s share of the fund is spent where Brexit has hit hardest – in the border regions. The lion’s share must be directed to helping workers and businesses walloped by Brexit along the border. I have argued that this fund – along with the PEACE programme, structural funds, the EU’s Recovery Fund of almost EUR 1 billion and regional aid changes – could form an important investment package for the border and North West if heads are banged together.
EU Blue Card Directive (A8-0240/2017 - Javier Moreno Sánchez)
I voted in favour of this revision as it includes some useful improvements, including more flexible admission criteria and a lower qualifying salary for applicants. It also expands the rights of beneficiaries with simplified intra-EU mobility and faster family reunification procedures.This is of particular importance now that British citizens are third-country nationals.
Instrument for pre-accession assistance (IPA III) 2021–2027 (A9-0266/2021 - Tonino Picula, Željana Zovko)
. ‒ I voted against the proposal to reject the Council’s position on the Pre-Accession Assistance instrument. The Council’s position is far from perfect (it allows for funds to go towards ‘migration management’ and security cooperation, which are not the core EU values such funds should be supporting). However, the proposal to reject the Council’s position came from an anti-immigration and potentially Islamophobic standpoint, as it called for an irrevocable end to all accession negotiations with Turkey. However, the Council position already makes room for changes in pre-accession funding in case an accession country displays a significant lack of progress towards EU values, which would allow for an adequate response to the actions of the current regime without permanently dismissing Turkey’s potential to one day become an EU Member State if its people so desire. Rejecting the Council’s position would also have had negative impacts for the other countries that benefit from pre-accession assistance. For these reasons I opposed this rejection.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (A9-0253/2021 - Joanna Kopcińska)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this proposal for the revision of the ECDC Regulation, to strengthen the role of the ECDC in monitoring, assessing, communicating on, providing warnings of and improving awareness for cross-border threats to health. While health is primarily a Member State competence, some cross-border issues are best dealt with at EU level. The proposal aims to give the ECDC more of a role in maintaining databases, response planning, inspecting Member State preparedness and responding to research requests, which will help all Member States better prepare and respond to future health threats. As it makes sense to have this level of coordination at EU level when responding to cross-border threats to health, I voted in favour.Parliament’s additions to this proposal include increasing the funding allocated to the ECDC, on top of that which has already been allocated in the multiannual financial framework. I disagree with its inclusion here, as discussions around budget increases should be kept within the confines of budget negotiations. However, this element does not negate the positive aspects of the proposal.
Serious cross-border threats to health (A9-0247/2021 - Véronique Trillet-Lenoir)
. ‒ This regulation proposes a framework to govern EU-level action on preparedness, surveillance, risk assessment, early warning of and response to serious cross-border threats to health. It is essentially a response to everything that was not done well during the COVID-19 pandemic, so seeks to give a lot more guidance and structure to the adoption of common EU measures against cross-border health threats. While the proposal grants a lot of new responsibilities to EU-level agencies / task-forces, it does stay within the existing health competences of the EU and deals with cross-border threats, i.e. issues that by their very nature are better dealt with at EU level. The proposal seeks to respond to the shortcomings that were widely identified in the EU’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and so is a practical effort to improve EU-level coordination in an area where experience has shown that EU-wide cooperation and adequate communication is necessary. For this reason, I voted in favour.
Amending Council Framework Decision 2002/465/JHA, as regards its alignment with EU rules on the protection of personal data (A9-0236/2021 - Jeroen Lenaers)
European Investigation Order in criminal matters: alignment with EU rules on the protection of personal data (A9-0237/2021 - Marina Kaljurand)
. ‒ Even though it does not apply to Ireland, I voted in favour of this technical amendment to the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (EIO) that replaces its rudimentary provisions on data protection with a reference to Regulation 2018/1725 on data protection by the EU institutions. It brings enhanced rights for individuals as well as legal clarity for authorities.
EU-Korea agreement: certain aspects of air services (A9-0251/2021 - Dominique Riquet)
I voted in favour of this report, which was a procedural vote on the agreement between the EU and Korea on certain aspects of air services. This is a Horizontal Aviation Agreement negotiated by the European Commission on behalf of EU Member States. The agreement allows any EU airline to fly to Korea from any of the EU Member States which currently have a bilateral air services agreement with Korea.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Criteria for the designation of antimicrobials to be reserved for the treatment of certain infections in humans (B9-0424/2021)
I voted against this objection, in order to support the original Delegated Act which was based on robust scientific advice. I welcome the debate which the objection created, as the questions raised by colleagues on the ENVI Committee were indeed valid and needed to be examined more closely. However, following exchanges with the European Commission and the EMA in which they responded to the objection, I was satisfied that the intention of the Delegated Act is to ensure effective action against anti-microbial resistance. The Delegated Act was developed with inputs from the EMA, the ECDC, the WHO, OIE and professional organisations from both animal and human medicine. On such a complex topic, I felt it responsible to follow the scientific advice, which in this case fell squarely on the side of the Delegated Act. For this reason I voted against the objection, but I nevertheless agree with its overall aim of tackling antimicrobial resistance in an ambitious and rigorous way. I look forward to future exchanges on the topic between the Parliament and the European Commission, a commitment which came about as a result of this objection being tabled.
A new EU-China strategy (A9-0252/2021 - Hilde Vautmans)
I abstained on this vote. The text contained good language around the appalling treatment of the Uyghur people, the lack of freedom of expression, the need to stop North Korea’s nuclear programme, ensure that the situation in Afghanistan does not get worse and respect for the Paris Agreement. However, I abstained because I disagree with the narrative that we need more NATO cooperation, that the EU should become a military geopolitical player and that using Chinese 5G automatically is a threat to democracy.
Direction of EU-Russia political relations (A9-0259/2021 - Andrius Kubilius)
I voted against this resolution. The text contained some good language around the lack of LGBTI+ rights, the prevalence of corruption, the attacking of political opponents and the lack of freedom of expression in general. However, the report called for a more hard-line militaristic approach when dealing with Russia. I think the language around NATO, EU defence capabilities and stepping up military exercises will only lead us back to Cold War politics. As a neutral country, Ireland should not be involved in such an escalation.
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A9-0262/2021 - Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová)
I voted in favour of this report which was linked to the European Semester as the Employment Guidelines set the scope and direction for Member States’ policy coordination and provide the basis for Country Specific Recommendations.The committee proposals contain strong language on specific vulnerable groups, gender equality, the fight against poverty (especially child poverty), social exclusion and homelessness, etc. Indeed, it highlights that homelessness is one of the most extreme forms of social exclusion, which negatively affects people’s physical and mental health, wellbeing, and quality of life, as well as their access to employment and other economic and social services.
Fair working conditions, rights and social protection for platform workers - New forms of employment linked to digital development (A9-0257/2021 - Sylvie Brunet)
I supported this very important report on the rights of platform workers. New technologies and innovations which have created digital platform workers and the use of FinTech (financial technology) cannot be allowed to erode the basis of workers’ rights.I am especially glad that the Parliament rejected calls by the right inspired by tech companies and FinTech companies to create a third category of worker, neither employed nor self-employed. This blurring of the lines would have served only to weaken fundamental worker’s rights in the name of innovation and disruption. These buzz-words cannot be used as an excuse for regression when it comes to workers’ rights.
Fishers for the future (A9-0230/2021 - Manuel Pizarro)
Plans and actions to accelerate a transition to innovation without the use of animals in research, regulatory testing and education (RC-B9-0425/2021, B9-0425/2021, B9-0426/2021, B9-0427/2021, B9-0428/2021, B9-0429/2021, B9-0432/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution to accelerate the phase-out of animal testing in research, regulatory testing and education. Despite existing EU commitments to end animal testing, progress has been too slow. Over 9 million animals are subject to testing each year, and 12 million are bred for testing but slaughtered without even being used for experimentation. At the same time, alternatives to animal testing are increasingly available. In order to speed up the phase-out of animal testing, the resolution calls for the Commission to establish a taskforce to work with Member States and stakeholders to draw up an EU-wide Action Plan. I support this approach and would emphasise the importance of including stakeholders from all sides - animal welfare, farming, veterinary medicine, academic research, health and safety monitoring etc. - in order to develop an Action Plan that is thorough and practicable.
Identifying gender-based violence as a new area of crime listed in Article 83(1) TFEU (A9-0249/2021 - Malin Björk, Diana Riba i Giner)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which would require all Member States to put an end to this systemic form of violence. While I am reluctant to extend the areas of competence of the EU, recommendations in the resolution would represent an expansion and extension of rights and protections of victims of gender-based violence and provide for common minimum definitions and common minimum standards.
Implementation of EU requirements for exchange of tax information (A9-0193/2021 - Sven Giegold)
Situation in Afghanistan (RC-B9-0455/2021, B9-0433/2021, B9-0453/2021, B9-0455/2021, B9-0458/2021, B9-0459/2021, B9-0460/2021, B9-0462/2021)
I voted against this text. It contained good language around the protection of women and minorities, calls for EU Member States to help refugees, condemning damage to cultural sites and for aid of EUR 200 million to be set aside. However, the text was not sufficiently critical of the illegal war, called for an EU defence union, more cooperation with NATO and more ‘military awareness’. As a neutral country, Ireland cannot consent to this change in direction for the EU.
Situation in Lebanon (RC-B9-0465/2021, B9-0464/2021, B9-0465/2021, B9-0466/2021, B9-0467/2021, B9-0468/2021, B9-0469/2021, B9-0470/2021)
I abstained on this text. The text contained good wording on the need to fight corruption, solidarity with protestors, the need for the election to take place and fighting forced labour. However, it pushed for International Monetary Fund control, the continued funding of the security forces that are responsible for human rights breaches and called for neoliberal reform of the public sector.
Media freedom and further deterioration of the Rule of law in Poland (B9-0461/2021, B9-0463/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which maintains pressure on Poland by demanding that the Commission take action on freedom of speech, judicial independence, LGBTQI rights, reproductive rights and the criminalisation of sexual education in schools.While I don’t support the ‘primacy of EU law’ in all circumstances, in the context described it is useful to recall.
Strengthening transparency and integrity in the EU institutions by setting up an independent EU ethics body (A9-0260/2021 - Daniel Freund)
In recent years, multiple cases of unethical behaviour in the EU institutions have revealed systemic shortcomings. The current EU ethics oversight system falls seriously short of reducing the risk of unethical behaviour.I voted in favour of the report because the creation of an ethics body sends a positive signal in the fight against unethical behaviour in the institutions. I was hoping for a more ambitious report, but the powers of enforcement can be extended in future.
Environment: The Aarhus Regulation (A9-0152/2021 - Christian Doleschal)
I voted in favour of this amendment to the Aarhus Regulation on access to justice and information on environmental issues. While the outcome of the trilogue negotiations was much less ambitious than the Parliament’s original report, the amending regulation contains some important steps forward compared to the status quo. It extends access to environmental justice to acts of general rather than just individual scope (meaning that a case can be taken based on general damage to the environment, without the plaintiff needing to show how they are directly affected). It also places limits on court fees NGOs can face if they take environmental cases to court. Access to information and justice on environmental issues is a fundamental civil right and our environmental laws will be more robust and effective if individuals and civil society have full access to this right.
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement EU/Greenland and Denmark (A9-0233/2021 - Pierre Karleskind)
The European Union and Greenland have very close ties in both fisheries and development matters. Greenland’s links with Denmark make it one of the EU’s longest-standing partners.I supported this agreement, which was concluded on 11 January 2021 and is in the process of being ratified. An important part of EU-Greenland fisheries relations is Protocol 34 to the TFEU, which provides for imports of Greenland fishery products to the EU as long as opportunities for access to Greenland fishing zones are satisfactory to the EU.
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement EU/Greenland and Denmark (resolution) (A9-0235/2021 - Pierre Karleskind)
The European Union and Greenland have very close ties in both fisheries and development matters. Greenland’s links with Denmark make it one of the EU’s longest-standing partners.I voted in favour of this resolution, which noted that Brexit has destabilised relations among North Atlantic countries with regard to fisheries. Sinn Féin agrees that Brexit has had a negative effect on fishing and coastal communities across Ireland and believes there should be burden-sharing in relation to any quota cuts as a result of Brexit.
The role of development policy in the response to biodiversity loss in developing countries, in the context of the achievement of the 2030 Agenda (A9-0258/2021 - Michèle Rivasi)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this own-initiative Report on biodiversity loss. The report highlighted that nearly half of the human population is directly dependent on natural resources for their livelihood, and many of the most vulnerable and poorest people depend directly on biodiversity to fulfil their daily subsistence needs.The report called for the EU to comprehensively address the root causes of biodiversity loss and to mainstream obligations on conservation, the sustainable use of resources and the restoration of ecosystems into its external development cooperation policy and partnerships.
Artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters (A9-0232/2021 - Petar Vitanov)
The impact of intimate partner violence and custody rights on women and children (A9-0254/2021 - Elena Kountoura, Luisa Regimenti)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this report in order to set a framework to ensure that, when establishing the arrangements for custody allocation, access and visitation rights, the effective protection of women and children from violence and the best interests of the child are paramount, and that intimate partner violence is clearly incompatible with the best interests of the child.
EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021-2030 – Recommendations on next steps towards "Vision Zero" (A9-0211/2021 - Elena Kountoura)
I voted in favour of this report on EU Road Safety Policy Framework. The report highlights a Commission study, which states only 8% of fatalities occur on motorways, while 37% occur in urban areas and 54% on rural roads. Among other things, the report called on the Commission and Member States to devise quality requirements for walking and cycling infrastructure in order to address the insufficient level of safety for active road users.
Rebuilding fish stocks in the Mediterranean (A9-0225/2021 - Raffaele Stancanelli)
. ‒ I supported this own-initiative report, which looked at the consequences of fish consumption reaching a new high in terms of kilograms per capita per year. The report not only highlighted the importance of a sustainable sector, but also highlighted that fishing is a strategically important economic and commercial sector whose survival must be guaranteed and protected at all costs so that it can meet the needs of an ever-growing population.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Active substances, including chlorotoluron and difenoconazole (B9-0481/2021)
I voted in favour of this objection, which opposed the extension of authorisation for two chemical substances, chlorotoluron and difenoconazole. The European Commission has the power to extend authorisation for chemical substances through implementing acts. However, this is only allowed for chemicals that are proven to present to unacceptable risk to people’s health. Since these two substances were last assessed and approved for sale and use in the EU, evidence of their impacts on human health has come to light. Chlorotoluron has been found to have endocrine-disrupting properties and difenoconazole severely contributes to resistance against medicines used to treat fungal infections in humans. In line with the precautionary principle, the Commission should undertake a proper reassessment of these substances before extending their authorisation.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives (B9-0476/2021, B9-0477/2021)
The Sustainable Finance Taxonomy lays down, by means of Delegated Acts, whether a type of activity can be considered to contribute towards climate change mitigation or adaptation, and whether it can be deemed to ‘do no significant harm’ to environmental and climate objectives. The Taxonomy is to be used in conjunction with funding programmes to determine what counts as ‘green spending’, and can be used by private finance to guide sustainable investments. While the Taxonomy still has flaws (e.g. around biomass and the yet-to-be-decided criteria for gas and nuclear activities), I voted against the two objections tabled against the Taxonomy Delegated Act. The language in the objections sought to promote nuclear energy and fossil gas as activities that can be deemed environmentally sustainable for the purposes of public funding.
The future of EU-US relations (A9-0250/2021 - Tonino Picula)
I voted against this report. Unfortunately, it created a narrative that the EU needs to adopt further strategic military autonomy, team up with the US against China and Russia, and create synergies between the EU and NATO. Sinn Féin is against any attempts by the EU to become a military world power, rather than its originally stated goal of fair trade and peace promotion. This military advancement aspect to the report overshadowed the good language around tackling climate change, eradicating the death penalty and dealing with systemic racism and police brutality.
Implementation report on the EU Trust Funds and the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (A9-0255/2021 - Öilan Zver, György Hölvényi, Janusz Lewandowski)
I abstained on this report. These funds have been very problematic, not only did they lack sufficient democratic oversight from the European Parliament, but also a high proportion of the money went on border management rather than helping refugees. Additionally, it was also uncovered that a funded project used slave labour. The report does cite the major issues with the funds, but fails to be strong enough in demanding a radical reform takes place or they are immediately terminated, to be replaced with a fit for purpose alternative, enjoying significant oversight from the European Parliament.
State of EU cyber defence capabilities (A9-0234/2021 - Urmas Paet)
I voted against this report. Cyber security is very important for Member States. This year the HSE was attacked, by a criminal gang, and it caused huge disruption for patients. I fully support more effort being spent to protect Ireland from criminal cyber-attacks. However, this report was primarily concerned with military cyber threats. Any spending on military equipment to deal with cyber warfare is effectively defence spending. Sinn Féin is against EU funding being directed towards cyber military technology. Ireland, as a neutral country, should not be contributing to a cyber-arms race. The EU budget should only be spent on programmes that have a positive impact for citizens, like the CAP or the ESI.
The Arctic: opportunities, concerns and security challenges (A9-0239/2021 - Anna Fotyga)
I abstained on this report. Although this report contained positive language on fighting climate change impacts, engaging in peaceful regional cooperation and respecting Arctic communities, it overly focused on the militarisation of the Arctic. The report was heavily focused on Russia and China, seeing their activity in the Arctic as a major threat to security. Worryingly, the EU proposed increasing its activity in the area, with ships under an EU flag. Such a move would only escalate tensions. The correct approach is to lobby at UN level for an agreement on the demilitarisation of the area.
The protection of persons with disabilities through petitions: lessons learnt (A9-0261/2021 - Alex Agius Saliba)
I voted in favour of this report on the protection of persons with disabilities.The report highlights that up to one quarter of the European electorate declare some degree of impairment or disability. Among other things, the report highlighted the need to raise awareness at all levels of the rights of persons with disabilities enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in order to protect their rights and dignity.
Banking Union - annual report 2020 (A9-0256/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
I opposed this report.The report includes some good parts about the need for a better regulation of the shadow-banking sector, fighting money laundering and improving consumer protection. However, the report does not appropriately address the ‘too-big-too-fail’ banks and the fact that as currently designed the Banking Union could still lead to taxpayers bailing out banks.I do support the call for the completion of the European Deposit Insurance Scheme.
Reforming the EU policy on harmful tax practices (including the reform of the Code of Conduct Group) (A9-0245/2021 - Aurore Lalucq)
I abstained on this report. This report on harmful tax practices comes at an important time as the OECD was finalising its agreement. Sinn Féin are clear that Ireland should be part of this agreement, despite its flaws.This report however goes much further and proposes the redesign of the Code of Conduct group to give it far-reaching powers to intervene in Member State tax policies. My party has always called for global action on tax avoidance not EU-led political plans with total harmonisation as a goal.
The situation in Belarus after one year of protests and their violent repression (RC-B9-0482/2021, B9-0482/2021, B9-0483/2021, B9-0485/2021, B9-0488/2021, B9-0494/2021, B9-0496/2021)
Sinn Féin supports the people of Belarus in their struggle for democracy. We believe the situation in Belarus has reached a point where the international community must act in order to pressure the government of Belarus to comply with international law.We maintain our firm view that the EU should promote dialogue and the peaceful resolution of conflict. However, we understand that where there is an unwillingness to engage in meaningful dialogue, sanctions may be necessary.We are concerned that the Common Foreign and Security Policy and Common Security and Defence Policy of the EU are more concerned with pursuing geo-strategic dominance than about supporting a rules-based international order. The tendency of many in the EU is to reach for wide-ranging sanctions without fully considering the impact they have on the people they purport to help and to use crises in the near-neighbourhood of the EU to promote a further militarisation of the EU. As a neutral country, Ireland must reject this approach.We insist that asylum seekers are given the full protection due to them under international law, regardless of attempts by the Government of Belarus to use them as a weapon in a fight against the EU.
Humanitarian situation in Tigray (RC-B9-0484/2021, B9-0484/2021, B9-0486/2021, B9-0487/2021, B9-0489/2021, B9-0492/2021, B9-0493/2021, B9-0495/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution. It called for an immediate ceasefire, the withdrawal of troops from captured territory, by both sides, the investigation of human rights abuses, adherence to international law and EUR 30 million in EU aid. Sinn Féin is very concerned about reports of massacres by both sides. It is important that the world media is given full access in order to record events.
Draft amending budget 4/2021: Update of revenue, revised forecast of own resources and other revenue (A9-0268/2021 - Pierre Larrouturou)
2019 Discharge: EU general budget - Council and European Council (A9-0276/2021 - Pascal Durand)
Credit servicers and credit purchasers (A9-0003/2021 - Esther de Lange, Irene Tinagli)
. ‒ I rejected this directive which will only empower vulture funds at the expense of workers, families and small businesses.I tabled a rejection amendment to throw this proposal out. Sinn Féin, through me and my predecessor Matt Carthy, have tried to reject this directive and at least dilute its negative impact on consumers. Unfortunately, the ideological approach of the EU on this issue is simply not compatible with protecting families and businesses from the claws of the vultures.There are no special protections for the family home in this directive and critically it seeks to regulate only credit servicers and not the owners of credit. This would be a massive weakness compared even to existing Irish legislation and open the door for vultures to challenge existing Irish rules
Farm to Fork Strategy (A9-0271/2021 - Anja Hazekamp, Herbert Dorfmann)
I voted in favour. I fully appreciate these ambitious targets are needed to deliver a sustainable transformation of our food production sector. If we get this right, the benefits include less biodiversity loss, more carbon efficient production, preserved water quality and higher animal welfare. From a food consumer’s point of view, who would be against fresh, less processed and sustainably sourced produce? I believe the societal importance of the Farm to Fork is unquestionable but its success will depend on whether policymakers can develop a toolbox, alongside farmers, to help them achieve the targets while remaining competitive. Farmers must be brought along at every stage, rather than be dictated to from on high.
Employment and social policies of the euro area 2021 (A9-0274/2021 - Lina Gálvez Muñoz)
I voted in favour of this report which highlighted that the COVID-19 crisis has exposed gaps in access to social protection and the importance of fostering greater resilience by improving the adequacy and coverage of minimum income schemes and pensions. The report also highlighted that certain political choices and fiscal policies made in the wake of the 2008 financial and economic crisis may have led to health and social systems in some Member States not being adequately prepared to face the pandemic.
Protecting workers from asbestos (A9-0275/2021 - Nikolaj Villumsen)
I voted in favour of this report, which highlights the dangers of asbestos, and proposed a European framework directive for national asbestos removal strategies. The report proposed that such a strategy would include the assessment of existing asbestos in the built environment, along with a clear timelines for its safe removal.
Europe’s Media in the Digital Decade (A9-0278/2021 - Dace Melbārde)
I voted in favour of this report, which highlighted the many of the issues being faced by the sector, such as the emergence of online platforms that have changed the way audiences consume content. It highlights that AV sectors urgently need support via the various EU funding programmes, such as Horizon Europe, the Creative Europe MEDIA strand and the Cohesion Funds.The report also highlighted the importance of availability of information and access to news media for every EU citizen in their respective language.
The effectiveness of Member States' use of EU Solidarity Fund money in cases of natural disasters (A9-0273/2021 - Corina Crețu)
The situation of artists and the cultural recovery in the EU (A9-0283/2021 - Monica Semedo)
Insurance of motor vehicles (A9-0035/2019 - Dita Charanzová)
I supported this directive as it will improve the rights of consumers, namely drivers, across the EU. Among other things, it allows drivers with a no-claims record in one country to transfer it to another.I took the opportunity to assert the right of Irish drivers to see reductions in their premiums now that pay-outs have dropped by 40%. There are tens of thousands of drivers in rural Ireland who don’t have the ability to access public transport and rely solely on privately owned vehicles. This also affects many young people who were being priced out of any ability to insure a vehicle for work or education needs.
Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe (A9-0246/2021 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
Joint Undertakings are partnerships between industry and the EU. This legislation gives all Joint Undertakings some common provisions, on membership, financial operations, liability, monitoring and evaluation, for example. While the report had some good content, I voted against it, in opposition to the overall idea of Joint Undertakings, which give public money to big industry actors and often create spaces for conflicts of interest. Some of the proposed Joint Undertakings are specifically problematic. For example, the Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking gives a leading role to a prominent fossil fuel lobby group.
EU transparency in the development, purchase and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines (B9-0519/2021, B9-0520/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which calls on the Commission to make global vaccine distribution a priority and to consider clauses around intellectual property rights in future vaccine contracts. The resolution recognises the particular responsibility of the EU in ensuring equitable and universal access to COVID—19 vaccines. It calls on the Commission to ensure that companies share knowledge and data through C—TAP and use all available options for increasing global production and distribution.
An EU strategy to reduce methane emissions (A9-0277/2021 - Maria Spyraki)
I voted in favour of this report on the methane strategy. The report responds to the methane strategy released by the Commission last year, dealing with measures to assess and reduce methane emissions in the energy, waste and agriculture sectors. It is quite a strong report that raises the level of ambition compared to the Commission’s strategy. It calls for binding requirements and reduction targets for all sectors. It highlights that assessing levels of methane emissions can go hand—in—hand with taking measures that are already known to reduce methane emissions, often at very low cost. It stresses that voluntary methane reduction efforts are important but that these need to be backed up with regulation. It calls for the EU to show leadership on global methane mitigation measures and support the establishment of an international methane emissions observatory. The section on the energy and petrochemicals sector was particularly strong, emphasising the ‘low-hanging fruit’ for methane emission reductions in these sectors.
UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, the UK (COP26) (B9-0521/2021)
I was happy to vote in favour of this strong resolution in advance of the COP26 conference. The resolution is clear that current emission reduction efforts are not sufficient and are being undermined by counterproductive policies. It contains good language on biodiversity protection, forests, oceans, human cost of climate change, human rights, system and behaviour change, historical responsibility, just transition, gender, and the rights of indigenous peoples. It underlines the urgency of making sure that the Covid-19 recovery is directed towards climate action, and calls for all MSs to develop fossil fuel phase-out plans. It calls on all Parties to increase their NDCs to levels that can achieve the Paris Agreement goals (current NDCs being far from adequate). It emphasises the importance of guaranteeing inclusive participation at COP26 and features good points on increasing attention, support and funding for climate adaptation.
Pandora Papers: implications on the efforts to combat money laundering, tax evasion and avoidance (B9-0527/2021, RC B9-0530/2021, B9-0530/2021, B9-0531/202)
I supported this resolution as the shocking Pandora Papers exposed massive hiding of wealth by the super-rich. The resolution contained many practical and common-sense measures that could be taken to crack down on this behaviour.There were other elements of the resolution that I did not support, including questioning unanimity on tax matters and other moves on tax harmonisation. If nothing else, some of these issues were unrelated to the content of the Pandora Papers.
The Rule of law crisis in Poland and the primacy of EU law (B9-0532/2021, B9-0533/2021, B9-0539/2021)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this resolution as it addresses the misuse of the judicial system by the Polish government to achieve its political agenda and calls on the Commission and the Council to act. The supremacy of the constitutions of Member States remains crucial, but using it to try to justify the abuse of human rights is legally, politically and constitutionally wrong.
Situation in Tunisia (RC-B9-0523/2021, B9-0523/2021, B9-0524/2021, B9-0525/2021, B9-0526/2021, B9-0528/2021, B9-0529/2021)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this resolution. I am very concerned by recent events in Tunisia. The president should immediately restore all democratic institutions and powers. His actions represent a grave breach of the constitutional order. I wish to highlight I am not in favour the EU telling any country it should accept an IMF loan; this is a decision solely for the people of Tunisia.
Climate, Energy and Environmental State aid guidelines (CEEAG) (B9-0534/2021, RC-B9-0535/2021, B9-0535/2021, B9-0536/2021, B9-0537/2021, B9-0538/2021)
This resolution dealt with guidelines on what sectors can receive State aid, and under what circumstances, when justified on climate and environmental grounds. The language around the fossil fuel phase-out and support for transition technologies was not strong enough, as it did not set time limits or safeguards to ensure that states are not subsidising polluting industries long after they cease to be economically tenable. The resolution also said that funding for fossil gas projects should be permitted as long as the projects were ‘future-proofed’ – an argument that will lead to fossil fuel lock-in as the renewable gases of the future will be used in very different ways and places compared with fossil gas today. For these reasons, I voted against this resolution.
2019 Discharge: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (A9-0270/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki)
I rejected granting discharge to the European Border and Coast Guard Agency as I am deeply concerned at the many allegations of human rights and financial abuses in the organisation. Moreover, I reject the militarisation of immigration responses that it embodies.I therefore supported the resolution, which made these points, although it could have been stronger.
European Partnership on Metrology (A9-0242/2021 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
I voted in favour of this file. The European Partnership on Metrology is a public-private partnership to bring national metrology research programmes together and develop measurement infrastructure for Europe. This is important for many different areas such as energy (e.g. measuring the efficiency of solar cells), health (e.g. improved MRI imaging), industry (e.g. measurements for innovative materials), and environment (e.g. monitoring harmful pollutants). Parliament’s additions to the proposal on transparency, gender balance and conflicts of interest were generally accepted by the Council, and improved the overall proposal.
European Union Agency for Asylum (A8-0392/2016 - Elena Yoncheva)
Serious cross-border threats to health (A9-0247/2021 - Véronique Trillet-Lenoir)
I supported this proposal when the Parliament voted on its main substance in September, as it does not overstep on EU health competences and covers specific trans-national factors that have proved sub-standard during the pandemic. These new amendments discussed the newly announced European Health Emergency preparedness and Response Authority (HERA), generally in reference to positive elements such as transparency, review processes and stakeholder participation. As I agree with the substance of these amendments, I voted in favour. However, I wish to state my disagreement with the way in which the Commission presents the HERA as the ‘next step towards completing the European Health Union’. Health is and should remain a Member State competence, except where Europe-wide cooperation is necessary to better protect people’s health, such as serious cross-border threats to health.
EU/Australia Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV (A9-0306/2021 - Daniel Caspary)
Strengthening democracy, media freedom and pluralism in the EU (A9-0292/2021 - Tiemo Wölken, Roberta Metsola)
I voted in favour of this report. The purpose of strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) legislation is to protect NGOs and journalists from lawsuits aimed at draining them financially, to back down from their investigations. This is a form of intimidation by powerful interests or companies.Sinn Féin will review any such legislative proposal very carefully to make sure the correct balance is struck between a requirement for new EU laws vs ensuring Ireland makes its own laws as far as practicable. We believe subsidiary is extremely important when speaking about the justice system.
The European Education Area: a shared holistic approach (A9-0291/2021 - Michaela Šojdrová)
The report on the European Education Area: a shared holistic approach is the European Parliament´s response to the Commission communication on achieving the European Education Area by 2025 and to the Council Resolution on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training towards the European Education Area and beyond (2021-2030).Although the report had many positive aspects, education is a Member State competence and therefore I abstained.
An intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience (A9-0284/2021 - Marion Walsmann)
I abstained on this report. Although I support the mentions of helping small and medium businesses, less counterfeited products for customers and strengthening Protected Geographical Indications (PGIs), I do not believe it is appropriate to pledge Sinn Féin’s support for the Unified Patent Court (UPC), before further discussions have taken place in Ireland.The UPC would be a new court and therefore require a change to the Irish constitution, through a referendum. The implications of such need greater debate at national level. Sinn Féin looks forward to engaging with stakeholders to discuss this proposal.
Statute and funding of European political parties and foundations (A9-0294/2021 - Charles Goerens, Rainer Wieland)
Democracy is best served by political parties operating – and being accountable - at the national rather than EU level. There is a role for EU cooperation between parties, which can be facilitated by European organisations, but I don’t agree with the attempt to extend their role at the expense of national parties (e.g. by pushing towards transnational lists). I voted against the report in particular due to the proposal to give European parties a role in deciding on constitutional issues in Ireland by their involvement in referendum campaigns.
The first anniversary of the de facto abortion ban in Poland (B9-0543/2021, B9-0544/2021)
I voted in favour of this motion, which marked one year since Poland’s de facto abortion ban. It highlights how the ban infringes on women’s rights to health and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), and how it is threatening their gynaecological care and safety. It calls on the Polish Government to make abortion services, contraception and comprehensive sex education available, and calls on the Commission and other states to support civil society organisations in Poland working on SRHR, and on the Council to ratify the Istanbul Convention.
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD (A8-0200/2019 - Peter Jahr)
Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring (A8-0199/2019 - Ulrike Müller)
Sinn Fein supports this new legislation, which should make the common agricultural policy (CAP) less about compliance and more about results, delivering for small and medium farmers and the environment. It will also help us identify those large enterprises who hoover up too much of the CAP envelope.
Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs): key information documents. Extension of the transitional arrangement (A9-0297/2021 - Jonás Fernández)
Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS): the use of key information documents (A9-0301/2021 - Jonás Fernández)
EU sports policy: assessment and possible ways forward (A9-0318/2021 - Tomasz Frankowski)
. ‒ I supported this own initiative report, which highlighted the importance of sports, especially grassroots sports. The report also highlighted the need for a new appreciation of good governance combining traditional commitments to integrity with progressive actions on gender equality and inclusiveness, bringing people together and serve as a vector for integration.
Digitalisation of the European reporting, monitoring and audit (A9-0311/2021 - Maria Grapini)
Draft amending budget No 6/2021: Additional vaccines doses to low and lower-middle income countries, UCPM reinforcement and other adjustments to expenditure and revenue (A9-0329/2021 - Pierre Larrouturou)
A European strategy for critical raw materials (A9-0280/2021 - Hildegard Bentele)
I voted against this report. It largely echoed and did nothing to majorly improve on the Commission’s strategy for critical raw materials, which prioritises industrial competitiveness over human rights and environmental protection. The report did not adequately focus on demand reduction for these critical raw materials, which should be the foundation of any such strategy. The EU’s need for these critical raw materials must not come at the expense of the rights and safe environment of communities who live where these minerals are extracted, particularly those living outside Europe. It was therefore disappointing that the amendment calling for binding corporate due diligence legislation was not included in the final text, as binding regulations on company obligations towards sustainability and human rights are crucial for ensuring that the renewable transition does not replicate the mistakes and abuses of the fossil fuel age.
The revision of the Financial Regulation in view of the entry into force of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (A9-0295/2021 - Nils Ušakovs, Monika Hohlmeier)
I supported this report as a new Financial Regulation is needed and this input from the EP is a positive one focussing as it does on transparency. It also makes the case for a link between respect of the Rule of Law and EU funding, something I support as the protection of Human Rights must be a non-negotiable issue in the EU.
A Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe (A9-0317/2021 - Dolors Montserrat)
Access to medicines is a hugely important issue that faces many challenges in the EU today. This report outlines many of these challenges, but often fails to identify their cause. The profit-driven, corporate model of the pharmaceutical industry contributes to many of the problems facing people’s access to affordable medicines. The sector needs to see a transformation, with greater public control over medicine supply and the results of pharmaceutical research, much of which is funded by public money. Considerations of profit should not be placed above people’s health, and this report does not highlight this adequately. Due to the overwhelmingly pro-industry tone of this report, at a time when we see pharmaceutical companies making billions in profits off publicly-funded vaccine research which they refuse to share, I voted against.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2021/001 ES/País Vasco metal – Spain (A9-0319/2021 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
In June 2021, an application for a financial contribution from the EGF was submitted, following 491 displacements in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 division 25 (Manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment) in the NUTS 2 region of País Vasco (ES21) in the Basque Country. Following its assessment of this application, the Commission has concluded, in accordance with all applicable provisions of the EGF Regulation, that the conditions for awarding a financial contribution from the EGF have been met, and therefore I voted in favour of this report.
Legal migration policy and law (A9-0314/2021 - Abir Al-Sahlani)
I voted in favour of this forward looking report that calls for legislation for (among other things): the creation of admission schemes for all skilled third—country workers, regardless of their skills; the establishment of an EU talent pool for legally migrating third—country nationals; the establishment of an EU—wide transnational advisory service network for legally migrating workers; and an admittance scheme for entrepreneurs and self—employed persons. I particularly welcome the calls for close cooperation with various actors, including civil society and social partners.
Introduction of a European Social Security pass for improving the digital enforcement of social security rights and fair mobility (B9-0551/2021)
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference in Geneva, 30 November to 3 December 2021 (B9-0550/2021)
This report has many shortcomings, particularly the language criticising the principle of Special and Differential Treatment for lower-income countries. However, as an amendment clearly calling for the EU to support a TRIPS waiver for Covid-19 vaccines and treatments was included in the final text, I voted in favour.As a result, this resolution contains a definite democratic mandate for the EU to stop blocking the sharing of intellectual property rights that could give millions more people worldwide access to vaccination and treatment against the corona virus.It is a disgrace that EU Member States are refusing to stand on the right side of history and support the TRIPS waiver. They must now respect the Parliament’s democratic mandate, as well as the call of the 242 000 people who have signed the No Profit on Pandemic European Citizens’ Initiative.
Hague Convention (1980) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: accession of Philippines (A9-0300/2021 - Gilles Lebreton)
I supported this proposed accession. I am pleased more countries are adding their names to the Convention. International child abduction is a complicated issue, especially when it occurs because of disputes between the parents. We need maximum cooperation among countries, in order to ensure the children are promptly returned to their rightful homes.
Hague Convention (1980) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: accession of Jamaica (A9-0299/2021 - Heidi Hautala)
I supported this proposed accession. I am pleased more countries are adding their names to the Convention. International child abduction is a complicated issue, especially when it occurs because of disputes between the parents. We need maximum cooperation among countries, in order to ensure the children are promptly returned to their rightful homes.
Hague Convention (1980) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: accession of Bolivia (A9-0307/2021 - Heidi Hautala)
I supported this proposed accession. I am pleased more countries are adding their names to the Convention. International child abduction is a complicated issue, especially when it occurs because of disputes between the parents. We need maximum cooperation among countries, in order to ensure the children are promptly returned to their rightful homes.
Hague Convention (1980) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: accession of Pakistan (A9-0308/2021 - Heidi Hautala)
I supported this proposed accession. I am pleased more countries are adding their names to the Convention. International child abduction is a complicated issue, especially when it occurs because of disputes between the parents. We need maximum cooperation among countries, in order to ensure the children are promptly returned to their rightful homes.
Hague Convention (1980) on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction: accession of Tunisia (A9-0309/2021 - Heidi Hautala)
I supported this proposed accession. I am pleased more countries are adding their names to the Convention. International child abduction is a complicated issue, especially when it occurs because of disputes between the parents. We need maximum cooperation among countries, in order to ensure the children are promptly returned to their rightful homes.
The safety of truck parking lots in the EU (B9-0552/2021)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this motion for a resolution, which is based on a petition signed by 22 735 people, which raises concerns about truck parking areas on the EU road network and calls for preventive measures to reduce the risk and magnitude of the safety problems in truck parking areas. As many of these trucks are transporting high value goods, they can often be targeted for robberies in rest stops and the drivers can often be hurt. The resolution highlights how this makes the profession of driving even less attractive to people.
European Year of Youth 2022 (A9-0322/2021 - Sabine Verheyen)
Joint investigation teams: alignment with Union rules on the protection of personal data (A9-0236/2021 - Jeroen Lenaers)
European Investigation Order in criminal matters: alignment with Union rules on the protection of personal data (A9-0237/2021 - Marina Kaljurand)
Predictability for Member States and procedures for dispute resolution when making available the traditional, VAT and GNI based own resources (A9-0347/2021 - José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer)
EU-US air transport agreement (A9-0335/2021 - Maria Grapini)
I voted in favour of this report is on the EU-US ATA agreement which allows airlines from the EU and airlines from the US to fly between any point in the European Union and any point in the United States. The Protocol expands the scope and depth of the ATA adding provisions to establish a comprehensive aviation partnership. Among the elements introduced by the Protocol are the importance of protecting the environment when developing and implementing international aviation policy; the attention of the social dimension of the Agreement; advances in the areas of security and competition.
EC/Gabon Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol (A9-0316/2021 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
I voted in favour of this report on the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the European Union which entered into force on 11 June 2007 for a period of six years. This agreement is renewable by tacit agreement and is still in force. This vote would cover the years 2021 to 2026. Among other things, the agreement aims to increase control and monitoring of catches to tackle IUU fishing.
International procurement instrument (A9-0337/2021 - Daniel Caspary)
I voted in favour of this proposal. It aims to ensure public procurement contracts reciprocity. In short, countries outside the EU can participate in EU public tendering process if they allow EU companies to participate in their tendering processes. If they do not allow this, the European Commission will tax their participation in EU tendering processes. This is about creating a level playing field for EU companies.
Transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices and deferred application of requirements for in-house devices (C9-0381/2021)
In-vitro diagnostic medical devices include HIV tests, pregnancy tests or SARS-CoV-2 tests. Around 70% of clinical decisions rely on in-vitro diagnostic devices. I voted in favour of this delay of the requirement of a new assessment process for in-vitro diagnostic devices. Due to delays brought about by the pandemic, independent assessors experienced backlogs and will not be able to assess all devices by the original deadline of May 2022. Delaying this deadline will allow for enough time for this assessment process. Until the new deadlines, all existing products will continue to be regulated under the older EU law on in-vitro diagnostic devices, so there will not be a gap with no legal oversight of these devices.
Digital Markets Act (A9-0332/2021 - Andreas Schwab)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this regulation, which seeks to improve competition and consumer protection in the digital marketplace. The Digital Markets Act lays down a series of obligations and prohibitions for very large ‘gatekeeper’ platforms, which provide services that link customers to smaller business users (e.g. social media, advertising services, search engines). The measures proposed in the Digital Markets Act will improve customers’ autonomy and choice over how their data is used, and limit the huge advantage that big platforms have over small and medium enterprises.
Equality between women and men in the European Union in 2018-2020 (A9-0315/2021 - Sandra Pereira)
The impact of organised crime on own resources of the EU and on the misuse of EU funds (A9-0330/2021 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
I supported this report as tackling organised crime abuse of the EU’s funds is an important topic. I do not however support the EPPO and reject the call in the report for Member States (like Ireland) who haven’t joined to do so. Sinn Féin is opposed to the concept of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office as it would constitute a greater centralisation of judicial autonomy in the EU at the expense of Member States’ judicial structures.
Avoiding corruption, irregular spending and misuse of EU and national funds in case of emergency funds and crisis related spending areas (A9-0320/2021 - Michèle Rivasi)
Implementation of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (A9-0321/2021 - Seán Kelly)
Energy efficiency in buildings is clearly a very important topic in terms of the energy transition and reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. While the report covered several relevant points, I did not vote in favour because I do not feel that it adequately addressed energy poverty and the fact that providing warm, comfortable homes for all should be the central goal of measures to improve and renovate our building stock. This report mentioned energy poverty a few times in a very general way, but didn’t come up with detailed constructive suggestions for tackling energy poverty. However, it did have very concrete suggestions for other topics, like charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Particularly given the rise in energy prices that households are facing, and the fact that 34 million Europeans live in energy poverty, I really feel that this report should have emphasised this more. To remedy this, my political group tabled three amendments saying that ‘comfort for people living and working in buildings, especially the most vulnerable’, should be prioritised over returns on investment, promoting smart technologies and value for money. Unfortunately, these amendments were rejected by the majority of MEPs, meaning that there was a deliberate omission of the importance of putting people, rather than financial gain, at the centre of our energy efficiency policies. I do not find this omission acceptable and therefore I voted against the report.
Challenges and prospects for multilateral weapons of mass destruction arms control and disarmament regimes (A9-0324/2021 - Sven Mikser)
I voted in favour of this text. It called for all countries to sign the new Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The MAD doctrine never guaranteed a safer world. Irish foreign policy must be based on the pillars of active neutrality and advocacy of weapons disarmament.It is important to point out the text was not perfect; it was weak on being critical of EU countries or EU allies who hold nuclear weapons. The text was heavy on China, Iran and Russia, but weak on the US, Britain and France. It also failed to highlight Israel’s complete lack of engagement, due to its denial of having nuclear weapons. I want to see all countries pressed to disarm now, regardless of whether they are EU countries or allies. This is the only way we can ensure our safety.
New orientations for the EU’s humanitarian action (A9-0328/2021 - Norbert Neuser)
I voted in favour of this report, which comes after the Commission published a Communication on ‘The EU’s humanitarian action: new challenges, same principles’ earlier this year. This report aims to be the EP’s response to the Communication, and sets out the Parliament’s priorities and policy recommendations regarding the EU’s humanitarian aid ahead of the first EU Humanitarian Forum to be organised in January 2022.Among other things, this report supports the provision of unhindered access to free public health services and efforts to reduce mortality and morbidity, and highlights the need to strengthen preparedness for pandemics and epidemics. Therefore, I voted in favour.
Cooperation on the fight against organised crime in the Western Balkans (A9-0298/2021 - Lukas Mandl)
I voted in favour of this report. The report dealt with the challenge that organised crime in the Western Balkans poses. Corruption is a major issue, along with human trafficking. The report makes it clear that progress must be made in regard to the judiciary, establishing special police units, forensic accounting and breaking criminal networks.
European framework for employees' participation rights and the revision of the European Works Council Directive (A9-0331/2021 - Gabriele Bischoff)
The situation in Nicaragua (RC-B9-0581/2021, B9-0581/2021, B9-0582/2021, B9-0583/2021, B9-0584/2021, B9-0585/2021, B9-0586/2021)
I voted against this resolution as it refused to recognise the election that took place in Nicaragua this November. I believe this is the first step in the EU’s strategy to impose heavy trade sanctions on Nicaragua. Regardless of what the EU will claim, those that will suffer most from such a measure are the civilian population. I believe the EU should engage in dialogue with the government of Nicaragua, instead of trying to ratchet up the tension. Sinn Féin firmly believes that political diplomacy must have primacy.
MeToo and harassment – the consequences for the EU institutions (B9-0587/2021)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which calls for improved governance within the European Parliament around preventing and tackling sexual harassment. Notably, the resolution calls for anti—harassment training to be mandatory for all MEPs. As a public representative I take my responsibility for tackling workplace harassment very seriously, and it is right that MEPs are held to a strict standard.
Situation at the Ukrainian border and in Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine (B9-0593/2021, B9-0594/2021, B9-0595/2021, B9-0596/2021, B9-0597/2021, B9-0598/2021)
While being critical of Russian government actions in the region, I voted against this resolution which seeks to escalate conflict. It does not help the people of Ukraine, nor peace in the region.I firmly believe in diplomatic, political measures to resolve conflict. This situation requires a process of dialogue, building on previous agreements in the framework of multilateral institutions.
Implementation of the Kimberley Process Certification scheme (B9-0591/2021)
European Medicines Agency (A9-0216/2021 - Nicolás González Casares)
I voted in favour of this regulation for the reinforced role of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in crisis preparedness and management for medicinal products and devices. It aims to strengthen the role of the EMA in contributing to managing health crises, specifically on the supply of medicines and medical devices. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown us how the coordination of medical supplies at EU level can be the best use of resources for guaranteeing access to medicines and treatments. Other than such instances where cross-border cooperation can help improve the safety of patients and the resourcing of our healthcare workers, health policy remains a Member State competency. The final agreed text of this regulation reflected this balance well; therefore I was happy to support it.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Determining cases where identity data may be considered as same or similar for the purpose of the multiple identity detection pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/817 (B9-0061/2022)
I voted in favour in order to object to the delegation to the Commission of powers with regard to multiple identity detection. The idea of detecting multiple identities is a good one. However, on the advice of the legal services of the Parliament, we should not give the Commission the power to determine the thresholds for checks and the algorithms without democratic scrutiny. I also object to the outsourcing of the task to an agency that has no mandate.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Determining cases where identity data may be considered as same or similar for the purpose of the multiple identity detection pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/818 (B9-0062/2022)
I voted in favour in order to object to the delegation to the Commission of powers with regard to multiple identity detection. The idea of detecting multiple identities is a good one. However, on the advice of the legal services of the Parliament, we should not give the Commission the power to determine the thresholds for checks and the algorithms without democratic scrutiny. I also object to the outsourcing of the task to an agency that has no mandate.
Digital Services Act (A9-0356/2021 - Christel Schaldemose)
The Digital Services Act attempts to regulate illegal content and disinformation online. It gives internet service providers a series of responsibilities, but larger providers and platforms have more responsibilities than smaller ones. These measures are intended to counter illegal activities, improve traceability and transparency, tackle disinformation and increase oversight of digital markets.This is a complex piece of legislation and there are a range of views as to how best make this legislation robust and effective. I am aware that many were unsatisfied with the final text, which is unfortunately lacking in some respects. I would have preferred to see better language on interoperability and the possibility for more enforcement options for the countries where consumers are based. The final text also prioritises trade secrets over transparency when it comes to recommender systems. Nevertheless, positive elements include stricter rules on targeted advertising, meaning that internet users must be able to easily opt out of receiving targeted ads without experiencing a lower-quality service. The Digital Services Act is an important milestone towards better regulation of big tech companies and illegal online content in the EU. I believe that it is important to take a stand for the better regulation of tech companies, and for this reason I voted in favour.
Protection of animals during transport (Recommendation) (B9-0057/2022)
I supported the Animal Transport Committee’s report. This report contained a number of important messages for the European Commission.These included a call for updated rules and for the appointment of a Commissioner with responsibility for animal welfare, and that we need to invest in more and better solutions to reduce the need to transport live animals.The report condemned cases of a lack of headroom, water or food supply for transported animals, animals being shipped when they are unfit for transport, and overcrowding. Finally, it suggested such helpful measures as CCTV on transport vehicles, particularly for loading and unloading, and not to approve travel plans when the temperature is forecast to be between 5ºC and 30ºC.
Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fisheries Resources in the North Pacific Ocean: accession of the European Union (A9-0008/2022 - Bert-Jan Ruissen)
I supported this report which aims to give the consent of the European Parliament to the accession of the EU to the Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in the North Pacific Ocean. The objective of this Convention is to ensure the long-term conservation and sustainable use of the fisheries resources in the Convention area while protecting the marine ecosystems of the North Pacific Ocean in which these resources occur.
Challenges for urban areas in the post-COVID-19 era (A9-0352/2021 - Katalin Cseh)
I supported this excellent report. I was very glad to see the EP support a call on countries and the EU to take action against the financialisation of housing. Corporate landlords are pricing working families and single people out of owning a home. The report was also very progressive in its statements on youth, LGBTI, platform workers and climate issues.
Impact of national tax reforms on the EU economy (A9-0348/2021 - Markus Ferber)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean GMB151 (BCS-GM151-6) (B9-0095/2022)
I voted in favour of this objection against an implementing act that authorises the placement on the market of a GMO soybean that is resistant to a group of very hazardous herbicides, such as isoxaflutole, mesotrione and tembotrionine, and produces an insecticidal protein (a Bt toxin), which is toxic to roundworms. Herbicide-resistant GMOs are problematic because they lead to higher levels of herbicide-spraying, and the herbicides in question are endocrine disruptors.In addition, this authorisation exceeds implementing powers provided for in the basic act and will lead to unacceptable risks to food safety, human and animal health and the environment. The authorisation is also not supported by a qualified majority of Member States in the comitology process, so the Commission is overstepping its mandate.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5) (B9-0094/2022)
I voted in favour of this objection against an implementing act that re-authorises the placement on the market of genetically modified cotton that is resistant to glyphosate. Herbicide-resistant genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are problematic because they lead to higher levels of herbicide-spraying, which has negative health impacts for farmers in the EU and in other countries. This undermines the EU’s commitments under the Sustainable Development Goals.In addition, this authorisation exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act, as it will lead to unacceptable risks to food safety, human and animal health, and the environment. The authorisation was not supported by a qualified majority of Member States in the comitology process, so the Commission is overstepping its mandate.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Acceptance period of vaccination certificates issued in the EU Digital COVID Certificate format indicating the completion of the primary vaccination series (B9-0092/2022)
I supported the objection to the delegated act on the grounds that it provides too much power to the Commission on a major matter of public health. If there are good public health reasons for extending the certificate, the Commission should come back to Parliament in order to ensure a proper evaluation of the effectiveness and use of the certificate (including its extensive use for purposes that were not originally foreseen).
Catch documentation programme for bluefin tuna (A9-0172/2021- Gabriel Mato)
I supported this report concerning the transposition of international measures proposed by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). These measures concern the documentation of bluefin tuna catches. The EU is legally obliged to transpose ICCAT measures into EU legislation and does so with this Commission proposal.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund – application EGF/2021/005 FR/AIRBUS – France (A9-0013/2022 - Valérie Hayer)
European Central Bank – annual report 2021 (A9-0351/2021 - Dimitrios Papadimoulis)
. ‒ I supported this report and commend the work of MEP Papadimulous in delivering a progressive report. Critically, it rejects using inflation as an excuse to return to austerity policies.Sinn Féin remains critical of the ECB’s lack of transparency and many of its disgraceful actions including towards Ireland. This report though shows a progressive way forward for the ECB.
Implementation report on on-farm animal welfare (A9-0296/2021 - Jérémy Decerle)
Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2020 (A9-0342/2021 - Eleonora Evi)
I voted in favour of this the annual Own Initiative Report, which details the work of European Ombudsman, Emily O’Reilly, in the year 2020. In 2020, 20 302 citizens called on the Ombudsman’s services for help, of whom 16 892 were given advice through the Interactive Guide on the Ombudsman’s website, while 1 262 remaining requests for information were replied to by the Ombudsman’s services and 2 148 were handled by the Ombudsman as complaints. Out of the total number of 2 148 complaints processed by the Ombudsman in 2020, 728 fell within the Ombudsman’s mandate and 1 420 fell outside the scope of the Ombudsman’s mandate.
A European strategy for offshore renewable energy (A9-0339/2021 - Morten Petersen)
Offshore renewable energy will play a crucial role in the energy transition and there is a real need to improve permitting processes, impact assessments and cross-border cooperation in order to facilitate the uptake of offshore wind and other renewable energies, such as wave energy, that are in earlier stages of development. The report outlines the need for funding, streamlined permitting procedures, port and grid infrastructure improvements, coordinated cross-border marine spatial planning and appropriate regulatory frameworks. It also touches on biodiversity protection, circular economy approaches and the importance of including female workers in the offshore renewable energy sector. While I support the broad strokes of the report, I nevertheless abstained on the final vote as the report was hugely focused on the private sector as the main actors in the development of offshore renewables. Member States and local authorities were presented as facilitators but nothing more. There was no element of publicly-owned renewable energy infrastructure or direct community benefit from offshore renewables. All the language was based on the existing energy market framework, which rings hollow at a time when this market model is being put into question by rising energy prices.
Assessment of the implementation of Article 50 TEU (A9-0357/2021 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
I voted in favour of this report, which is a very helpful outline of how Article 50 worked. The report is rightly critical of the uncertainty caused by the British government approach, but recognises that Article 50 strikes a good balance between ensuring a legally sound withdrawal process and safeguarding the political flexibility necessary for adaptation to the specific circumstances.I particularly welcome the report’s appreciation of the prioritisation at an early stage of the border in Ireland and citizens’ rights.
Implementation of the Sixth VAT Directive (A9-0355/2021 - Olivier Chastel)
I rejected this report for a number of reasons.It covers the social issues of VAT policy only rhetorically while the main emphasis is on VAT as a problem for SMEs. It also tends towards supporting more harmonisation of VAT and less exceptions. Sinn Féin is in favour of maximum flexibility.The report was also unambitious in its plan for VAT reform. For context, in 2018, the Commission proposed a serious overhaul allowing huge flexibility which has now been watered down hugely. This report seeks further dilution.
Rail: prolongation of temporary levying of charges - COVID-19 (C9-0001/2022)
I voted in favour of this regulation (EU) 2020/1429, which aimed to enable rail stakeholders to cope better with the financial consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and to respond to their urgent liquidity need, through the reduction, waiver or deferral of charges for the minimum access package and for access to infrastructure connecting service facilities. The proposal aims at ensuring the extension and continuity of these extraordinary measures. It was proposed to extend the reference period until 30 June 2022, and to empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts to further extend such period until 31 December 2023. It is also proposed that the delegation of power should end on the same date, that is, 31 December 2023.
Macro-financial assistance to Ukraine(C9-0028/2022)
I approved providing this loan to Ukraine. Due to the ongoing tensions, and what has now become a war, Ukraine’s economy has almost collapsed. This money will hopefully play an important role in minimising the human suffering as a result, for example by keeping public services like hospitals operating.
Implementation of the Toy Safety Directive (A9-0349/2021 - Brando Benifei)
I voted in favour of this INI report on the implementation of the Toy Safety Directive. The 2009 Toy Safety Directive sets harmonised EU standards for toy safety, including obligations for manufacturers, importers and distributors, and enforcement by market surveillance authorities. The report highlights a series of flaws in its implementation, including enforcement difficulties (especially in online toy sales), outdated limits on chemicals in toys, lack of rules on endocrine disruptors in toys, ‘grey areas’ of products not marketed as toys but which are used by children, and data protection concerns over toys with internet connection. The report calls for a review of the Toy Safety Directive to address these issues, which I support.
Strengthening Europe in the fight against cancer (A9-0001/2022 - Véronique Trillet-Lenoir)
I voted in favour of this report, which is focused on cancer prevention, equal access to cancer care, cancers among young people and rare cancers. It looks at the role of the EU in supporting Member State work in the areas of cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis and treatment, and quality of life of cancer patients and survivors.While health is a Member State competence, which the report acknowledges, there are relevant areas of EU action such as funding, research, cross-border healthcare and communication campaigns. Particularly as regards the prevention of cancer, the EU already plays a role, as a lot of carcinogenic substances (alcohol, tobacco, chemicals) are already regulated at EU level. For this reason, having a coordinated EU policy approach is relevant. For issues that are Member State competences, the report respects subsidiarity. The fight against cancer is of constantly growing importance and impacts all EU citizens in one way or another. It is a positive step to see a strong European Parliament report addressing this issue and as a result I was happy to vote in favour.
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2021 (A9-0354/2021 - David McAllister)
I voted against this report. I believe the tone of the report was about turning the EU into a military block, rather than a trading one. It contained more ambition on the EU as a sanctioning body, which is a role I prefer the UN to mostly be in charge of. It also spoke about military strategic autonomy, the pooling of military resources, military exercises and more cooperation with NATO. This is not what Ireland signed up to. Ireland is a neutral country and I am very proud of this. We need to focus on peace and diplomacy not armament.
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2021 (A9-0358/2021 - Nathalie Loiseau)
Human rights and democracy in the world – annual report 2021 (A9-0353/2021 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos)
I abstained on this report. It contained a lot of very positive aspects, such as on refugees, human rights defenders, women’s rights, ecocide and LGBT rights. However, it sought a move to qualified majority voting in the Council. Sinn Féin believes unanimity should be required. This is the only way Ireland can ensure it does not end up being part of EU actions that go against its foreign affairs policy. I defend the right of Ireland to be solely responsible for its foreign affairs policy.
Corruption and human rights (A9-0012/2022 - Katalin Cseh)
I abstained on this report. I agree with nearly all of the text in this report. It contains important language on the freedom of information, further monitoring of EU fund beneficiaries and how corruption undermines public services. However, the report sought to see corruption as equal to human rights abuses, therefore adding them to the human rights sanction mechanism. The human rights sanction mechanism is to sanction people for crimes like the arrest of protestors, murder of civilians or serious suppression of the media. I do not think it is appropriate to lump corruption into this category solely to make it easier to sanction people.
Tackling non-tariff and non-tax barriers in the single market (A9-0336/2021 - Kosma Złotowski)
I voted against this report, which focuses on prioritising the Single Market above worker rights and takes a negative view of Member States having their own specific requirements, systems and standards in the fields of employment law and environmental protection. The use of the term ‘gold-plating’ seeks to stigmatise Member State regulations, particularly in the area of labour rights, that go beyond the EU minimum standard. This is a regularly recurring report and the language in this report is a clear regression on its predecessors. For this reason, I voted against.
A statute for European cross-border associations and non-profit organisations (A9-0007/2022 - Sergey Lagodinsky)
Empowering European youth: post-pandemic employment and social recovery (B9-0091/2022)
. ‒ This resolution is based on 2022, the European Year of Youth. The resolution considers that 2022 should provide an additional impetus for the proper and full implementation of the European youth (EYY) strategy through ambitious actions to address challenges faced by young people. Therefore I voted in favour.
The EU priorities for the 66th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (B9-0099/2022)
. ‒ The UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) is the UN organ promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women. This resolution is the European Parliament’s stance in advance of this year’s meeting. It is a solid resolution that calls on the Council to acknowledge the impacts of climate change on women and the role of women in tackling climate change, to take concrete measures and provide funding for protection of women impacted by climate change, to empower women’s involvement in decision-making and to protect women environmental defenders. It calls for a greater commitment against gender-based violence and emphasises the need to protect and promote the rights of all marginalised groups. I was happy to vote in favour.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers - application EGF/2022/000 TA 2022 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A9-0037/2022 - José Manuel Fernandes)
Shrinking space for civil society in Europe (A9-0032/2022 - Anna Júlia Donáth)
I supported this report which condemns threats and attacks on civil society organisations and human rights defenders, and expresses deep concern about the increased violence and hatred targeting organisations and activists working on anti-racism, religious minorities, feminism and LGBTIQ+ rights. I urge the Commission to use its enforcement powers against Member States which unduly restrict civic space in violation of EU laws, while properly safeguarding the legitimate interests of final recipients and beneficiaries.
Cohesion policy: reducing healthcare disparities and enhancing cross-border health cooperation (A9-0026/202 - Tomislav Sokol)
I supported this report as, coming from a cross-border region, I see how these areas suffer in health terms. The EU should work on all cross-border health areas – not just those internal to the EU.I do have major reservations about the report’s calls for a European Health Union. Countries should cooperate on health issues, but it should remain a national competency.
Cohesion policy: promoting innovative and smart transformation and regional ICT connectivity (A9-0010/2022 - Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro)
I supported this important report. Among the issues it tackled was the digital divide between urban and rural areas. I also support its focus on smart villages. The development of smart villages will be key to achieving Europe’s digital and green transition. The EU will be assisting with funding through a number of routes, including cohesion funding, the common agricultural policy and Next Generation EU funds.
Rates of value added tax (A9-0036/2022 - Marek Belka)
. ‒ I supported this report. These new EU rules allow greater flexibility for Member States like Ireland. This new flexibility must be used fully to tackle the cost of living crisis.For example, up to now, only medicine taken orally was allowed to avail of the zero rate of VAT. This can now be changed as soon as the new rules come into play. Internet access as part of a digitalisation policy can now be moved from the standard rate of 23%. Certain period products which were not exempt can now be made exempt from VAT. The government must examine all the possibilities with an eye on tackling the cost of living above all else.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Union list of projects of common interest for the trans-European energy infrastructure (B9-0137/2022)
. ‒ Every 2 years the Commission issues a delegated act saying which energy projects will receive special priority status and become eligible for CEF funding. This 5th PCI list still contains fossil gas projects and contradicts the ongoing revision of the underlying TEN-E legislation, which will exclude most fossil fuel projects. The objection motion makes it clear that the objection is based on the climate impact of gas (not opposition to the renewable energy projects also on the list) and the links to corruption and human rights abuses. It calls on the Commission to present a new, fossil-free list by June so as not to delay the renewable/ smart grid projects on the list. I co-signed this objection and was happy to vote in favour.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB811 (BCS-GH811-4) (B9-0126/2022)
. ‒ This objection was to an implementation act for authorising the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB811. GM cotton was developed to confer tolerance to glyphosate and HPPD inhibitor herbicides. The objection was put forward on the grounds that the authorisation exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act and that the authorisation will lead to unacceptable risks to food safety, human and animal health and the environment. The objectors also believe that the authorisation could undermine the EU’s commitments under the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Therefore I voted in favour.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified oilseed rape 73496 (DP-Ø73496-4) (B9-0127/2022)
. ‒ This objection is to the authorising of the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified oilseed rape 73496. GM oilseed rape is tolerant to glyphosate through expression of the glyphosate acetyltransferase protein GAT4621. This objection was put forward on the grounds that the authorisation exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act and that the authorisation will lead to unacceptable risks to food safety, human and animal health and the environment. The objectors also believe that this authorisation could undermine the EU’s commitments under the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Therefore, I voted in favour.
Foreign interference in all democratic processes in the EU (A9-0022/2022 - Sandra Kalniete)
. ‒ I voted in favour. In the past, we have seen companies like Cambridge Analytica be linked to the Leave Campaign’s success during the Brexit debate. With big tech using algorithms to decide what people see, it is becoming harder to avoid such targeting when online.Parliament proposes a number of measures to tackle the issue, for example further regulating social media companies and improving digital literacy. It is important to note we must test everything against the requirement to respect fundamental rights. High quality, transparently financed and independent news media and professional journalism are essential for media freedom, pluralism and the rule of law, and are therefore a pillar of democracy and the best antidote to disinformation.Sinn Féin is concerned about calls to bind the EU closer to NATO, whether it be in the field of cyberwarfare or traditional military cooperation. Sinn Féin uses its voice to promote conflict resolution, disarmament and respect for neutrality. Fully appreciating the crisis we are in, due to Putin’s disregard for international law and the lives of civilians, we must not lose sight of the fact that a lasting peace will be the fruit of dialogue, rather than an escalation.
Citizenship and residence by investment schemes (A9-0028/2022 - Sophia in 't Veld)
I supported this report. It is important to clamp down on the sale of EU passports for sale to money-launderers and other criminals. It is particularly important at this time to ensure that oligarchs don't avoid the sanctions that are targeting them. I welcome the fact that in some of the worst offenders are changing their laws to prevent the practice.
Engaging with citizens: the right to petition and refer to the European Ombudsman, the European Citizens’ Initiative (A9-0018/2022 - Marie-Pierre Vedrenne)
I supported this report which looks at the functions of the European Ombudsman, the EP’s Petition Committee and European Citizen Initiatives (ECI). The report highlights some of the issues citizens can encounter when engaged in the processes and contain suggestions for improvements, such as the need to ensure an adequate follow-up to petitions in parliamentary and legislative work.
General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030 (A9-0203/2021 - Grace O'Sullivan)
I voted in favour of this final compromise agreement on the 8th Environmental Action Programme. The EAP is a multi-annual framework to coordinate and set direction for the EU’s environmental policy. The parliament’s position for this proposal was very ambitious. In the final agreement, many of the European Parliament’s proposed additions have been removed, particularly those related to new legislative initiatives. For example, the 2025 deadline for the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies was replaced by a commitment to set a deadline for phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. However, the overall ambition is still higher than the original proposal. The shift from a silo-based approach to one of systemic change is emphasised, and improved language was added on the just transition and the gendered aspect of environmental problems.
A new EU strategic framework on health and safety at work post 2020 (A9-0023/2022 - Marianne Vind)
I voted in favour of this report from the EMPL committee which focuses on a new EU strategic framework on health and safety at work post 2020. It is the European Parliament’s reaction to the European Commission’s EU strategic framework on health and safety at work 2021-2027 (Occupational safety and health in a changing world of work) published in June 2021. The report aims to raise the Commission’s strategic framework ambition to take into account the profound changes in the labour market that occurred during the pandemic, such as teleworking.
Setting up a special committee on COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and recommendations for the future (B9-0139/2022)
I supported the establishment of this committee. The mandate is good, broad and inclusive, not only dealing with health but also fundamental rights, the impacts on vulnerable groups, the response mechanisms and their impact. I voted in favour of all amendments reaffirming that that public health is a Member State competence.
Setting up a special committee on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation (B9-0140/2022)
Setting up a committee of inquiry to investigate the use of the Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware (B9-0138/2022)
I supported the establishment of this committee. Pegasus is considered to be the most advanced spyware tool that has been deployed to date.The establishment of the committee relates mainly to the uncovered cases where the spying software was used in Hungary to target journalists, and in Poland, where it was used against high-ranking politicians from the opposition party and members of the judiciary who have spoken out against the dismantling of the independence of the judiciary.It has already been purchased by about 15 Member States, ostensibly not for internal use. I would not be surprised if the Committee discovers that its use is more widespread than governments are admitting.
Gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament – annual report 2020 (A9-0021/2022 - Irène Tolleret, Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield)
I voted in favour of this report on the state of gender mainstreaming in the European Parliament. It remarks on some positive elements and outlines work that remains to be done, including: gender action plans with clear targets rather than vague principles; an investigation of the impact of menopause on working life of staff; gender balance in committee leadership; 6 months fully-remunerated maternity and paternity leave for staff; the possibility for MEPs to take maternity and paternity leave while still being able to represent their constituents; and gender balance of speaker appearing before parliamentary committee hearings.
EU Gender Action Plan III (A9-0025/2022 - Chrysoula Zacharopoulou)
The EU’s Gender Action Plan (GAP) addresses gender issues in the EU’s external actions. This report is an endorsement by the parliament of the 3rd GAP, for 2021-25. The report denounces backsliding on women’s rights around the EU, calls for increased cooperation with civil society and local groups, highlights the need for regular independent assessment of progress under the GAP, and increases the percentages of overseas development aid that should go to programmes where gender equality is a main objective. It supports a binding Business and Human Rights treaty at UN level and calls for gender equality aspects to be included in the EU’s trade agreements. I was happy to vote in favour.
Rule of law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling (B9-0134/2022, B9-0135/2022, B9-0136/2022)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which puts more pressure on the Commission to act in case of rule of law breaches.The ECJ ruling on February 16 rejected the annulment actions brought by Hungary and Poland against the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation, which provides for the blocking of European funds to a country whose breaches in terms of the rule of law threaten the proper use of the European budget.The ECJ found that the conditionality mechanism is compatible with the Treaties.
European Withholding Tax framework (A9-0011/2022 - Pedro Marques)
I abstained in this report.I see the merit in such an approach but as this touched on the rights of Member States to set their own tax policy and rates we must tread carefully. I am opposed to moving away from unanimity on tax issues. Sinn Féin will examine any formal proposal from the Commission, if and when it is produced.
European Semester for economic policy coordination: annual sustainable growth survey 2022 (A9-0034/2022 - Irene Tinagli)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the annual sustainable growth strategy survey 2022 (A9-0040/2022 - Helmut Geuking)
Batteries and waste batteries (A9-0031/2022 - Simona Bonafè)
This proposed revision of the Batteries Directive is part of the Circular Economy Action Plan and aims to better include circularity, sustainability concerns and the latest technological developments. It establishes mandatory requirements for all batteries placed on the EU market, relating to sustainability, hazardous substances, carbon footprint, mandatory recycled content targets, durability and replaceability. It contains due diligence requirements for economic operators. This is an important file and the report of the ENVI Committee improves the original proposal from an environmental and safety point of view. For this reason I voted in favour.
EU Citizenship Report 2020 (A9-0019/2022 - Yana Toom)
Fair and simple taxation supporting the recovery strategy (A9-0024/2022 - Luděk Niedermayer)
More flexible use of funds under the AMIF Regulations in light of the war in Ukraine (C9-0056/2022)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this report despite reservations about certain aspects of it, such as:– potential diversion of resources away from integration of refugees towards a security approach;– possible diversion of resources away from some refugees towards ‘favoured’ refugees;– private donors allowed, which raises a lot of questions.However, the need for support for the huge numbers of Ukrainian refugees outweighs these reservations.
Status Agreement between the EU and Moldova on Frontex operational activities (C9-0120/2022)
. ‒ I voted against this resolution which is very much in the logic of ‘fortress Europe’. The Ukrainian refugee crisis is being used to embed an agency that has nothing to do with supporting refugees. There has been no proper scrutiny of the proposal (which already applied provisionally, so there was no need for the urgent procedure). Among the specific difficulties is that the agreement allows any FRONTEX activity, which can include the prevention of unauthorised entry, such as Ukrainian men who are conscientious objectors.
Pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology (A9-0240/2021 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
I voted against this report. Distributed ledger technology (DLT) is as yet unproven technology at this scale. The final report fails to heed the concerns of the ECB and others that strict thresholds should be put in place to ensure that this is a pilot project and not an exercise in deregulation. This is not an opposition to innovation or technological advances; it is an opposition to recklessness.
Roaming Regulation (recast) (A9-0286/2021 - Angelika Winzig)
I voted in favour of this prolongation of the Roaming Regulation, which prohibits mobile phone network providers from charging customers more for their mobile data when they are travelling in the EU. This Regulation has brought large benefits to EU citizens and will now be extended for another 10 years. However, those living in the north of Ireland can no longer benefit from free data roaming; the Roaming Regulation should be extended to the whole island.
Macro-financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova (A9-0043/2022 - Markéta Gregorová)
I supported providing macro-financial aid to Moldova. Due to the ongoing war in Ukraine, Moldova is receiving high numbers of refugees and every effort must be made to help them cope with the added financial pressures. It is important to note that I disagree with linking this money to IMF conditionality.
Computerised system for the cross-border electronic exchange of data in the area of judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters (e-CODEX system) (A9-0288/2021 - Emil Radev, Nuno Melo)
Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Italy (A9-0046/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I voted against this technical file concerning data exchange with regard to cross-border crime. The data that can be exchanged includes fingerprints and DNA. It is doubtful whether this automated exchange of highly personal data is actually in line with the EU’s rules on the protection of personal data. It is a decentralised system, with far too few safeguards, and its implementation varies widely between different Member States. A lot of the requests made under the system are not related to forensic investigations, suggesting that they are made because the option exists, and not because it is really necessary.
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Italy (A9-0050/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I voted against this technical file concerning data exchange with regard to cross-border crime. The data that can be exchanged includes fingerprints and DNA. It is doubtful whether this automated exchange of highly personal data is actually in line with the EU’s rules on the protection of personal data. It is a decentralised system, with far too few safeguards, and its implementation varies widely between different Member States. A lot of the requests made under the system are not related to forensic investigations, suggesting that they are made because the option exists, and not because it is really necessary.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Italy (A9-0047/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I voted against this technical file concerning data exchange with regard to cross-border crime. The data that can be exchanged includes fingerprints and DNA. It is doubtful whether this automated exchange of highly personal data is actually in line with the EU’s rules on the protection of personal data. It is a decentralised system, with far too few safeguards, and its implementation varies widely between different Member States. A lot of the requests made under the system are not related to forensic investigations, suggesting that they are made because the option exists, and not because it is really necessary.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Greece (A9-0049/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I voted against this technical file concerning data exchange with regard to cross-border crime. The data that can be exchanged includes fingerprints and DNA. It is doubtful whether this automated exchange of highly personal data is actually in line with the EU’s rules on the protection of personal data. It is a decentralised system, with far too few safeguards, and its implementation varies widely between different Member States. A lot of the requests made under the system are not related to forensic investigations, suggesting that they are made because the option exists, and not because it is really necessary.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Maximum residue levels for flutianil (B9-0168/2022)
I supported this objection against increasing the maximum residue levels for flutianil in imported foods. While scientific assessments of flutianil are conflicting, the European Food Safety Authority considers that it is both a carcinogen and an endocrine disruptor. The Commission must undertake a full, up-to-date assessment before taking any steps to increase the maximum residue levels. In addition, we should not diminish the EU’s environmental standards in order to permit the import of foodstuffs that do not meet this requirement.
Need for an urgent EU action plan to ensure food security inside and outside the EU in light of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (RC-B9-0160/2022, B9-0160/2022, B9-0162/2022, B9-0163/2022, B9-0164/2022, B9-0165/2022, B9-0166/2022, B9-0167/2022)
I voted in support of this resolution. Sinn Féin believes farmers need a swift response to the emerging crises in agri-markets. The Commission’s communication is a start, but we will likely need to go further. This resolution contained important proposals on protecting the livelihoods of our primary producers. It is important to note that I think we can protect the agri-sector and guarantee food security without compromising on our climate ambition.
MFF 2021-2027: fight against oligarch structures, protection of EU funds from fraud and conflict of interest (A9-0039/2022 - Petri Sarvamaa)
Strengthening the application of the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women (A9-0056/2022 - Samira Rafaela, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen)
Revision of the Market Stability Reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (A9-0045/2022 - Cyrus Engerer)
I voted in favour of this file to retain the 24% MSR withdrawal rate after 2023. The key political debate on the EU ETS and the role of market mechanisms in climate action is yet to be held, when the revision of the wider ETS comes before the parliament. The retention of the higher withdrawal rate will keep the current level of ETS ambition from backsliding while the broader reform is being negotiated, but does not preclude greater ambition for the MSR in the overall ETS revision.
Protection of the rights of the child in civil, administrative and family law proceedings (A9-0033/2022 - Adrián Vázquez Lázara)
Trans-European energy infrastructure (A9-0269/2021 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
. ‒ I voted against this regulation. The TEN-E Regulation sets out a framework for the planning, prioritisation and funding of cross-border energy projects in the EU. The original regulation was out of sync with the goals of the Paris Agreement, as it allowed continued EU support for fossil fuel projects. This was supported by a hugely problematic governance structure which placed gas and electricity transmission system operators (TSOs) at the centre of the planning process for determining how much new energy infrastructure was needed.The TSOs were major beneficiaries of EU funding allocated to energy projects that filled an apparent gap that they themselves had identified. The revision of the TEN-E has failed to remove the TSOs from their central role, and leaves the door open for the funding of fossil fuel projects in the form of low-carbon hydrogen. The revision falls short of what it needed to do and so I voted against it.
Equivalence of field inspections and of certain seed produced in Bolivia (A9-0053/2022 - Veronika Vrecionová)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this legislation. The procedure will allow the recognition of farm field inspections taking place in Bolivia. The granting of equivalence of field inspections carried out in third countries on seed-producing crops and of equivalence of seed produced in third countries is based on the OECD Seed Schemes for the Varietal Certification of Seed moving in International Trade and the methods of the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). I am satisfied Bolivia meets the relevant standards.
Measures against water pollution caused by nitrates, including improvements in the different nitrate measuring systems in member states (B9-0176/2022)
. ‒ I supported this resolution, which was based on petitions raising concerns over the pollution of bodies of water as a result of nitrate, and denouncing breaches of relevant EU environmental legislation. The resolution highlighted how 30 years on from the Nitrate Directive there are still issues with water quality due to run off from waste water treatment, etc.
Data Governance Act (A9-0248/2021 - Angelika Niebler)
. ‒ I abstained on this legislation which seeks to provide a not-for-profit framework for the sharing of data in the EU. It aims to facilitate a culture of data sharing and reuse that will benefit industry and research. While this is an interesting initiative, posing an alternative to the data ownership hegemony of Big Tech, I abstained due to concerns over data protection when EU data is transferred to third countries.
Global approach to research and innovation: Europe’s strategy for international cooperation in a changing world (B9-0174/2022)
I abstained on this resolution. The resolution contained many good points about the promotion of gender equality in research, support for open science and reciprocal access to research programmes (at least in principle). However, a large emphasis is placed on intellectual property rights, including in paragraphs referring to health research. Concerns about intellectual property should not come before the provision of affordable healthcare to all. For this reason I abstained.I also note the resolution’s call that agreements with third countries under Horizon Europe should only be made with countries that respect human rights. This is why I have called for Israel’s participation in Horizon Europe to be frozen until Israel guarantees its compliance with its obligations under international law towards the Palestinian people.
Implementation of citizenship education actions (A9-0060/2022 - Domènec Ruiz Devesa)
This own initiative report looked at the role education has in fostering common European ideals/citizenship/identity, etc.. Among other things, the report considers education as a fundamental right and a public good and stressed the need to include the reality of those with migratory background, migrants and refugees. I was unable to support the final text of the report, however, as it exceeded the remit of the EU’s competence in education. As education is a Member State competence I voted to abstain.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified soybean MON 87769 X MON 89788 (B9-0178/2022)
I abstained on this objection. This particular objection focused on the resistance of this soybean to glyphosate, which is currently authorised in the EU, so the situation is more nuanced then for authorisation requests for GMOs resistant to substances that are not permitted in the EU. In addition, in the face of food security risks due to the war in Ukraine, care must be taken to not unduly restrict access of farmers to soy feeds. However, the process by which the Commission issues these GMO authorisations is, by the Commission’s own admission, a major democratic deficit. The Commission must change its authorisation process and undertake up-to-date scientific assessments when approving the placement of GMOs on the market.
Medicinal products made available in the UK with respect to Northern Ireland, Cyprus, Ireland and Malta (C9-0475/2021 - Pascal Canfin) (vote)
. ‒ I supported these mitigation measures for the Protocol proposed by the Commission concerning the supply of British-produced generic medicine. Despite the fact that the British government have not actually engaged with the substance of the proposal, the importance of human health makes it necessary for the EU to adopt it unilaterally. This demonstrates the EU’s willingness to solve problems that arise with the implementation of the protocol.
Investigational medicinal products made available in the UK with respect to Northern Ireland, Cyprus, Ireland and Malta (C9-0476/2021 - Pascal Canfin) (vote)
. ‒ I supported these mitigation measures for the Protocol proposed by the Commission concerning the supply of British-produced generic medicine. Despite the fact that the British government have not actually engaged with the substance of the proposal, the importance of human health makes it necessary for the EU to adopt unilaterally. This demonstrates the EU’s willingness to solve problems that arise with the implementation of the protocol.
Gas storage (C9-0126/2022 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi) (vote)
. ‒ I abstained on this file. As Ireland does not have gas storage, nor a gas interconnection with another EU Member State, I understand that the storage requirements in this Regulation cannot directly apply to Ireland. I therefore abstained so as to not be in a position of imposing requirements on other Member States that are not relevant for Ireland.
The Schengen evaluation mechanism (A9-0054/2022 - Sara Skyttedal)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this report, which amends the SEM regulation in order to: increase the strategic focus of the SEM, increase efficiency, effectiveness and peer-pressure; optimise the participation of Member State experts and the cooperation with EU bodies, offices and agencies; and – very importantly – strengthen the evaluation of the respect for fundamental rights under the Schengen acquis.
Right to repair (B9-0175/2022)
I voted in favour of this resolution which expressed the Parliament’s view on the upcoming Commission proposal on the right to repair. The resolution calls on the Commission to require manufacturers to design their products so that they last longer, can be safely repaired and their parts easily removed. This should be done by including product-specific durability and repair requirements in the revised Ecodesign Directive. The Right to Repair should also extend to independent repairers having access to parts and information in order to repair products. The Right to Repair is an important feature of the circular economy, and can also improve consumer rights and be a driver for job creation.
Parliament’s estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2023 (A9-0087/2022 - Niclas Herbst)
Situation in Afghanistan, in particular the situation of women’s rights (RC-B9-0198/2022, B9-0198/2022, B9-0199/2022, B9-0202/2022, B9-0204/2022, B9-0205/2022, B9-0206/2022)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which highlighted the Taliban’s actions against the rights of women and girls, as well as the increase in child marriages, infant mortality, poverty, media repression, sex trafficking, and killings of minority groups since the Taliban takeover. It says that access to education for women and girls must be a condition of any future EU commitments with the Taliban authorities, and says that for the moment, there is no justification for recognition of a Taliban government, based on the EU’s own benchmarks for the respect of human rights. Any further talks with the Taliban must include Afghan women representatives. The resolution also calls on the EU to protect and support those fleeing Afghanistan and to provide adequate humanitarian aid funding.
EU Protection of children and young people fleeing the war against Ukraine (B9-0207/2022, B9-0212/2022, B9-0213/2022)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 24-25 March 2022: including the latest developments of the war against Ukraine and the EU sanctions against Russia and their implementation (RC-B9-0197/2022, B9-0197/2022, B9-0200/2022, B9-0201/2022, B9-0203/2022, B9-0210/2022, B9-0211/2022)
Election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (A9-0083/2022 - Domènec Ruiz Devesa)
Amending Annexes IV and V to Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 on persistent organic pollutants (A9-0092/2022 - Martin Hojsík)
I voted in favour of this report. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are toxic organic substances that take a long time to break down, meaning that they can remain present in the environment, food chain and even in our bodies. Some examples of POPs are certain pesticides and industrial chemicals. Health impacts of POPs include cancer, reproductive disorders, damage to the nervous system and immune system disruption. The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (which Ireland has ratified) establishes control measures to address POPs. The ‘POP Regulation’ implements the EU’s commitments under the Stockholm Convention.This amending regulation concerns POPs and waste disposal. POPs pose a large problem for the disposal of electronic waste, construction waste and packaging waste. These waste products should all be recyclable, but the long-term presence of POPs in these products makes this more difficult. This amending regulation changes some of the thresholds for how certain waste pollutants should be treated, to bring them in line with the latest scientific evidence under the Stockholm Convention.
Common system of value added tax (VAT): extension of the application period of the optional reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud (A9-0128/2022 - Markus Ferber)
Application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the area of Schengen Information System in Cyprus (A9-0082/2022 - Peter Kofod)
A sustainable blue economy in the EU: the role of fisheries and aquaculture (A9-0089/2022 - Isabel Carvalhais)
Whilst I welcome much of what’s contained within this report, I could not support it due to the lack of engagement with the Irish fishing sector, who are already under severe pressure. The report also failed to address important issues such as the ownership and control by big corporations of fish quotas in several Member States and the use of transferable quotas to avoid prosecution for overfishing by state fisheries regulators, such as the SFPA.
EU action plan for organic agriculture (A9-0126/2022 - Simone Schmiedtbauer)
Persecution of minorities on the grounds of belief or religion (A9-0071/2022 - Karol Karski)
Reaching women's economic independence through entrepreneurship and self-employment (A9-0096/2022 - Pernille Weiss)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this report about the need to promote female entrepreneurship and self-employment, as a path to women’s greater economic independence. While it comes from a quite neoliberal standpoint (focusing on individual solutions rather than system-wide reform), it contained many good points, for example references to intersectional discrimination and the need to promote entrepreneurship of women with disabilities, migrant women and older women. It highlighted that a lack of social protections and unbalanced distribution of care work can disadvantage female entrepreneurs, and called on Member States to ensure access to social welfare systems and entitlements for self-employed workers and entrepreneurs.
The follow up of the Conference on the Future of Europe (B9-0228/2022, B9-0229/2022, B9-0235/2022)
. ‒ There are some fairly positive aspects to this resolution (social, climate, rights), but there are also some fundamental difficulties that it is not possible for me to support (e.g. the end to unanimity in Council, particularly on issues related to foreign policy, security and defence). While I agree that the EU Treaties should be fundamentally changed, I am not convinced that a convention to change the Treaties on the basis of this resolution would be a good thing. Therefore I abstained.
Strengthening Europol’s mandate: cooperation with private parties, processing of personal data, and support for research and innovation (A9-0290/2021 - Javier Zarzalejos)
. ‒ I am concerned about the extension of the powers and competences of Europol. It will become easier for Europol to process and analyse ‘large datasets’ provided by national police authorities (usually copies of the entire memory of phones and computers). Europol will get broader competences to receive data from private parties and third countries and a new competence to develop AI tools. A lot of it is problematic, but as there are some positives (such as data protection rules and the appointment of a Fundamental Rights Officer), and due to the importance of crime prevention and detection, I abstained on this vote.
Distortive foreign subsidies (A9-0135/2022 - Christophe Hansen)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the text. The new legislation proposes that the Commission would investigate non-EU companies, operating in the EU, who buy EU companies or receive money from their governments to participate in EU tendering contracts. This legislation is important to ensure fair competition in the EU.
Transitional rules for the packaging and labelling of veterinary medicinal products (C9-0054/2022)
Competition policy – annual report 2021 (A9-0064/2022 - Andreas Schwab)
I voted against this report. This is ECON’s annual competition report. The report is quite right-wing and seeks a return to a general ban on state aid, albeit on a phased-out basis. It does have some decent elements around the need for state aid for the green and digital transition but even this is quite weak. This type of conservative thinking is not what we need.
Threats to stability, security and democracy in Western and Sahelian Africa (B9-0255/2022, B9-0256/2022, RC-B9-0257/2022, B9-0257/2022, B9-0258/2022, B9-0259/2022, B9-0260/2022)
I abstained on this report. Although I understand a desire to support countries who ask for assistance, when fighting armed groups who commit acts of violence against civilians, I have concerns about the presence of EU troops or guns in Africa. In the past we have seen EU money be used to fund government forces that later used these new weapons to kill civilian protestors. Sinn Féin was opposed to Irish troop’s presence in Mali and believes our international role should always be directed through the UN.
Ongoing hearings under Article 7(1) TEU regarding Poland and Hungary (B9-0262/2022, B9-0263/2022, B9-0264/2022)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which puts pressure on the Council regarding its role in the Article 7(1) TEU procedures, denounces its lack of action in the past years and calls on it to show genuine commitment. Urges the forthcoming Presidencies to organise - at a minimum - one hearing per Presidency, to publish comprehensive minutes after each hearing and to provide a proper debriefing to the Parliament.The resolution reiterates the call on the Commission and the Council to refrain from approving the national plans of Poland and Hungary under the Recovery Resilience Fund until all criteria are fulfilled and calls for further action from the Commission under the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation as regards Poland.
State of play of the EU-Moldova cooperation (RC-B9-0240/2022, B9-0240/2022, B9-0241/2022, B9-0242/2022, B9-0243/2022, B9-0244/2022, B9-0245/2022)
The impact of the war against Ukraine on women (B9-0219/2022)
I voted in favour of this resolution which highlights the specific impacts of the war in Ukraine on women. It outlines the dangers and discriminations faced by women, third country nationals and trans women. It calls on all Member States to guarantee access to sexual health and reproductive rights for those fleeing the invasion. It encourages the EU to support anti—trafficking measures such as accompanied transport for refugees.
Impact of Russian illegal war of aggression against Ukraine on the EU transport and tourism sectors (B9-0223/2022)
Temporary trade liberalisation supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products under EU/Ukraine Association Agreement (A9-0146/2022 - Sandra Kalniete)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this proposal. Ukraine’s economy is in ruins due to the war Russia has cruelly unleashed against it. The EU must facilitate Ukraine’s economic recovery in every way possible. I hope this trade liberalisation will resulting in much needed money flowing into the Ukrainian economy.
Preservation, analysis and storage at Eurojust of evidence relating to genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and related criminal offence (C9-0155/2022)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this proposal as it will allow Eurojust to collect, preserve and analyse evidence in relation to genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and related criminal offences and, when necessary and appropriate, enable its exchange or otherwise make it available to the competent judicial authorities, national or international. We must do all we can to ensure this evidence is preserved.
Regulation (EU) 2016/1628: Extension of the empowerment to adopt delegated acts (C9-0119/2022)
I voted in favour of the extension of the Commission’s power to adopt delegated acts related to emissions limits for non-road vehicles. The Commission can now continue to adopt delegated acts updating the emission limits to the latest technological developments. In this case, as the delegation relates to a science-based adjustment and not political decisions, there is no issue with extending the power to adopt delegated acts in this case.
EU Association Agreement with the Republic of Moldova (A9-0143/2022 - Dragoş Tudorache)
I voted in favour of this report. The report highlights Moldova’s need to improve in a number of areas, such as judicial independence, free media, gender equality and stamping out corruption. I hope Moldova can make progress in these areas.It is important to note that I disagree with the language in the report around Moldova needing to align itself with the CFSP, make reforms that could mean privatisation of public services. The actions of Frontex in Moldova should also be closely monitored, to ensure they comply with human rights principles and laws.
Commission’s 2021 Rule of Law Report (A9-0139/2022 - Terry Reintke)
I voted in favour of this report. While welcoming the Commission’s 2021 Rule of Law Report which scrutinises all Member States, this report finds the Commission report too descriptive, limited in scope and considers that it could have provided clearer assessments. It stresses that the Commission’s main priority should be to enforce EU law when breaches of Article 2 TEU occur and it calls on the Commission to adopt clear country-specific recommendations on how to address concerns. It also calls on the Commission to consider including within the scope of future reports the application of all rights guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights and a link with all the tools available to address rule of law deficiencies.
2021 Report on North Macedonia (A9-0133/2022 - Ilhan Kyuchyuk)
I voted in favour of this report, which notes the many improvements that North Macedonia has made in the fields of tackling corruption and organised crime, ensuring inter-ethnic harmony, media freedom, gender equality, LGBTIQ rights, broadening social security coverage, climate legislation, proper implementation of new electoral laws, rule of law and judicial independence.I disagree with the parts of the report that praises North Macedonia’s alignment with the EU’s foreign and security policy and membership of NATO. Questions of military alignment cannot be forced upon countries that wish to become EU Member States.
2021 Report on Albania (A9-0131/2022 - Isabel Santos)
I voted in favour of this report, which notes the progress that Albania has made in issues like media freedom, Roma rights and judicial reform, and calls for better accountability of public institutions, electoral reform and an end to political polarisation.I disagree with the parts of the report that praises Albania’s alignment with the EU’s foreign and security policy and membership of NATO. Questions of military alignment cannot be forced up countries that wish to become EU Member States. This report also welcomed Albania’s involvement in Frontex’s border control operations. The actions of Frontex in Albania should be closely monitored to ensure they respect human rights.
Prosecution of the opposition and the detention of trade union leaders in Belarus (B9-0269/2022, RC-B9-0270/2022, B9-0270/2022, B9-0274/2022, B9-0275/2022, B9-0276/2022, B9-0277/2022)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which focused on the intensification of attacks on trade union activists and leaders in the last two months, primarily in relation to many of them having stood up against Belarus’s support for Russia’s war in Ukraine. Among other things, the resolution highlighted that at least 18 trade union leaders and representatives of Belarus’s independent trade union movement were arrested on 19 April 2022 and that Belarusian authorities have closed down at least 275 civil society and human rights organisations and blocked several independent media outlets over war reporting, citing the spread of ‘extremist materials’ and ‘false information’.
Minimum level of taxation for multinational groups (A9-0140/2022 - Aurore Lalucq)
I supported this report as it sticks closely to what was agreed at the OECD. Sinn Féin have always argued for a global solution, not an EU one. The OECD is not global and is not representative of the developing world yet it is a step forward.That agreement should be implemented. It is not a perfect deal but it is an agreement among sovereign countries to make sure hugely wealthy and profitable multinationals start paying a fair share or at least a share. That is long overdue.In Ireland, 53% of the corporation tax total – EUR 8.2 billion – was paid by only ten companies. This model is fraught with risks and now is the time to invest in a more balanced economy while protecting Foreign Direct Investment and the jobs it creates.
Establishing the European Education Area by 2025 – micro credentials, individual learning accounts and learning for a sustainable environment (B9-0266/2022)
I supported this resolution on micro-credentials, individual learning accounts and learning for a sustainable environment. Among other things, the resolution emphasised the importance of adult learning, upskilling etc. and called for a common definition of micro-credentials, which would form the basis for quality assurance, recognition, transparency and portability. Whilst we believe education should remain a Member State competence, we supported this resolution as the proposals would benefit workers and learners across the EU.
The fight against impunity for war crimes in Ukraine (B9-0272/2022, RC-B9-0281/2022, B9-0281/2022, B9-0282/2022, B9-0283/2022, B9-0284/2022, B9-0285/2022)
I supported this resolution. I am very concerned by the frequent reports of war crimes being committed in Ukraine by Russian soldiers. These crimes must be documented with a view to those responsible being prosecuted in the ICC or by other methods, such as universal jurisdiction. I am in full agreement that a tribunal should be established in collaboration with the UN and Council of Europe. Additionally, it is appropriate that Eurojust help with the evidence gathering where possible.
Social and economic consequences for the EU of the Russian war in Ukraine – reinforcing the EU’s capacity to act (RC-B9-0267/2022, B9-0267/2022, B9-0271/2022, B9-0273/2022, B9-0278/2022, B9-0279/2022, B9-0280/2022)
I supported this resolution, even if it was quite weak in some areas, such as the need to protect working families from the cost of living crisis that has been exacerbated by the brutal Russian invasion of Ukraine.The single market as a concept must not trump the immediate and urgent need to take action to protect working people in this time of crisis.The resolution also supports own resources which my party does not and calls for some Budget reforms that are aspirational and require a lot of scrutiny.
Extension of the Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of Galileo and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications (A9-0153/2022 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
Galileo is the EU’s global navigation satellite system and this vote concerned the consent procedure of the agreement between the EU and US on the use of Galileo and GPS satellite-based navigation systems. I supported this vote as I believe there is value in having a navigation satellite system, but for purely civilian use only.
2021 Report on Turkey (A9-0149/2022 - Nacho Sánchez Amor)
I abstained on this report. Although Sinn Féin welcomes open and respectful relations with all countries, further concessions, in the form of an enhanced customs union, should not be granted unless Turkey is complying with its obligations deriving from the current customs union. Additionally, I disagree with the language around Turkey needing to align itself with the European Union’s CFSP. This is an attempt to create a united military block. Sinn Féin believes this language does not belong within an EU text. Sinn Féin is against the EU’s militarisation.
The EEAS’s Climate Change and Defence Roadmap (A9-0084/2022 - Thomas Waitz)
. ‒ I voted against this report. The report was focused on making weapons more ‘green’. A green weapons arms race is still an arms race. Sinn Féin believes a report on reducing emissions from the arms industry should be focussed on coming to agreements with other countries to stop the arms race. The main beneficiaries from this text are the arms makers. Sinn Féin strongly opposes any of the EU budget being channelled into the weapons industry.
The EU and the security challenges in the Indo-Pacific (A9-0085/2022 - David McAllister)
. ‒ I voted against this text. The text aimed to develop a security and foreign affairs policy for the region. It discussed French territories being used for potential European deployments, unity against China, deepening cooperation on defence and the EU developing strategic autonomy. Sinn Féin believes any foreign affairs policy that Ireland implements should be designed in Dublin and supported by the Irish people.
EU islands and cohesion policy (A9-0144/2022 - Younous Omarjee)
. ‒ I was very happy to support this report, which made some important points about the needs of our island communities.One proposal in the report was to make 2024 the Year of Islands in the EU. I strongly believe in this proposal and I am of the opinion that it will give the opportunity to have a real discussion on the future of our coastal and island communities.I will be following up with the Commission to ensure that this proposal is given real thought.
Article 17 of the Common Fisheries Policy Regulation (A9-0152/2022 - Caroline Roose)
. ‒ This own-initiative report mainly looks at how Member States are distributing fishing opportunities that are allocated to them at the EU level to see if this is in line with their obligations under Article 17 of the CFP and in coherence with the wider objectives of the CFP. Whilst I agreed with much of what was contained within this report, I abstained on the final vote as it did not address the move towards the industrialisation of the fishing industry in Europe and how the CFP is allowing this.
Strengthening Europol’s mandate: entry of alerts in SIS (A9-0287/2021 - Javier Zarzalejos)
I abstained on this report. Its provision of Europol with broader competence to receive data from private parties and third countries and to add a new competence to develop AI tools are potentially problematic. However I recognise that there are some positives such as data protection rules and the appointment of a Fundamental Rights Officer.
EU/Mauritania Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Implementing Protocol (A9-0148/2022 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
The FPA with Mauritania is part of a network of bilateral agreements that the EU has put in place in Northwest Africa, namely with Morocco, Senegal, The Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia and Ivory Coast.I voted against this report as the money allocated under the agreement to the local fisheries sector is the bare minimum showing that the main aim in this agreement is to grant access to large external fisheries operators at the expense of the developing country in question. The money allocated to the local sector under this agreement is 3.3 million EUR, lower than the 4.13 million a year under the previous Protocol.
EU-Mauritania Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Implementing Protocol (Resolution) (A9-0154/2022 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
Whilst I agree with much of what is in the resolution, particularly around its recognition of the importance of small-scale fisheries, ultimately I could not support as it welcomes the FPA with Mauritania, which I opposed on the basis that the money allocated under the agreement to the local fisheries sector is the bare minimum showing that the main aim in this agreement is to grant access to large external fisheries operators at the expense of the developing country in question.
Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System for aviation (A9-0155/2022 - Sunčana Glavak)
I voted in favour of this file, which represented a significant increase in the climate ambition demanded from the aviation sector. The European Parliament adapted the Commission’s proposal to take a better approach to the relationship between the EU ETS and CORSIA, applying the EU ETS to more international flights in recognition that it is a more demanding climate instrument than the international offsetting system agreed by ICAO.
Notification under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) (A9-0145/2022 - Sunčana Glavak)
I voted in favour of this report which implements a technical change to EU legislation regarding the emission offsetting requirements under CORSIA. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the ICAO Council decided that 2019 emissions should be used as baseline for offsetting in the CORSIA scheme in 2021-2023 instead of the average of 2019-2020 emissions. This change has to be implemented in law, or else the airline operators will face an unclear regulatory environment.
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States (Effort Sharing Regulation) (A9-0163/2022 - Jessica Polfjärd)
I voted in favour of this revision of the Effort Sharing Regulation, which increases Member State’s national emission reduction targets in the sectors of buildings, road transport, agriculture and waste. I support this increase in line with the EU’s new climate neutrality goal, and with Ireland’s own new national targets for 2030 and 2050. The Effort Sharing Regulation is an important instrument as, apart from setting the emissions targets, it leaves flexibility for Member States to reduce emissions in a way that makes most sense for the particular circumstances of their economies. The proposed introduction of an ETS for buildings and road transport hints at a move away from national responsibility for emission reductions. I think this would be a bad move as it would remove decision-making about climate action further away from the people it impacts.
Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) (A9-0161/2022 - Ville Niinistö)
I voted in favour of this revision to the LULUCF Regulation, which brings it in line with the EU’s new 2030 climate targets. The main change the European Parliament made to the Commission’s proposal was to remove the articles relating to the combining of the LULUCF and agriculture sectors for accounting purposes from 2030. The latter raises concerns about that non-CO2 emissions from agriculture would not be adequately tackled under this accounting structure. Land use removals are different to GHG emissions and should not be used in a 1-for-1 offsetting arrangement.
The EU’s Foreign, Security and Defence Policy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine (A9-0164/2022 - David McAllister, Nathalie Loiseau)
This report was a proposal to deepen EU defence integration. The report was very clear in spelling out the aim of the European Union becoming a geopolitical military bloc, referred to as ‘strategic autonomy’.In a time when people are struggling due to the cost of living crisis, it called for billions of euros to be redirected from the EU budget to militarisation, increased funding for military mobility, weapons being funded from the EU peace facility and using the European Investment Bank to pay for military equipment. It also called for all Member States to spend more on militarisation and cited the 2% NATO commitment.The text compromises Irish neutrality by calling for an EU defence union, removing the requirement for unanimity on foreign affairs issues in the European Council, developing PESCO and more co-operation with NATO. We believe that Ireland’s policy of neutrality should be enshrined in our Constitution, and we have twice introduced legislation in the Oireachtas to this effect.It is important to note that Sinn Féin voted in favour of the text’s reference to granting Ukraine EU candidate status. Sinn Féin fully supports Ukraine’s aspiration to join the EU. We have consistently made this clear.
Security in the Eastern Partnership area and the role of the common security and defence policy (A9-0168/2022 - Witold Jan Waszczykowski)
I reiterate again my solidarity for Ukraine and its people. This report was about increasing military tensions well beyond the current borders of the EU.I voted against this policy and in particular the call on PESCO countries to integrate more policies in line with the EU’s CSDP. Irish neutrality must be defended.
The rule of law and the potential approval of the Polish national Recovery Plan (RRF) (B9-0316/2022, RC-B9-0317/2022, B9-0317/2022, B9-0320/2022, B9-0321/2022, B9-0322/2022, B9-0323/2022)
International procurement instrument (A9-0337/2021 - Daniel Caspary)
. ‒ I supported this text. It deals with reciprocity in public tendering procedures. This will mean third countries can participate in EU tendering processes only if they let EU companies do the same in their national processes. The text contained progressive language around provision for social and environmental standards, including international agreements such as the Paris Agreement and ILO Conventions. It allows the inclusion of key stakeholders in the process, such as trade unions, NGOs and civil society organisations.
Parliament’s right of initiative (A9-0142/2022 - Paulo Rangel)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this report, which calls for a genuine right to initiative for the European Parliament through a revision of the Treaties – and in the meanwhile a revision of the interinstitutional agreement. It is common sense not to allow the Commission to have the exclusive power to propose legislation.
Global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturn of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court (B9-0289/2022, B9-0292/2022, B9-0299/2022)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this resolution which condemns the backsliding on women’s rights taking place in the US and around the world. The potential reversal of the Roe v. Wade ruling, and the series of ‘trigger laws’ restricting abortion that would follow, would negatively affect women’s health, particularly that of marginalised and vulnerable women and girls. In this vein, the resolution also called for the provision of universal healthcare in the US.
The call for a Convention for the revision of the Treaties (B9-0305/2022, B9-0307/2022)
While I would support Treaty Change in certain areas, I voted against this resolution as it seeks to further centralise decision-making in areas that should remain Member State competence and seeks to undermine the position of smaller Member States, including by the removal of unanimity in certain areas.
A new trade instrument to ban products made by forced labour (B9-0291/2022)
I voted in favour of this text. It called for a strong import and export ban on products manufactured or transported by forced labour, with no exception for any company or sector and is applicable to the whole supply chain. It means customs authorities could launch the process based on information provided by civil society, trade unions, or other sources. Importantly, companies found liable must provide compensation to affected workers.
Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System (A9-0162/2022 - Peter Liese)
I abstained on this file. The need to bring the EU’s climate legislation up to date with its new climate targets is clear. However, Sinn Féin is sceptical about the EU’s over-reliance on market mechanisms to generate emission reductions. Furthermore, the proposal to create a new ETS covering road transport and buildings is a regressive move that would have the greatest impact on the most vulnerable with an unclear climate benefit.The original compromise reached by the ENVI Committee did contain positive improvements on the Commission’s proposal. However, during the first June plenary, this compromise was completely watered down, leaving a shell of an agreement that could not be supported. At the time, I voted against the overall file, as I felt it was not the best of what the Parliament could contribute to the legislative process. However, when the ETS file came back before the plenary, it had received some minor cosmetic improvements, but nothing like what is demanded by the climate science. I could not support this file, but abstained in recognition of the fact that the legislative process needs to keep moving in light of the limited time left to prevent run-away climate change.
Social Climate Fund (A9-0157/2022 - David Casa, Esther de Lange)
I voted in favour of this file which establishes an EU fund to address the negative social impacts of the energy transition. While a much larger envelope would be needed to properly support the renovation wave and eliminate energy poverty, this is an important instrument, particularly if the new ETS on buildings and road transport is implemented, placing the largest burden on the most vulnerable. I believe that support from the Social Climate Fund should begin before the new ETS is implemented, to allow low-income households to benefit from energy-saving measures in preparation for the extended ETS.
Carbon border adjustment mechanism (A9-0160/2022 - Mohammed Chahim)
I voted in favour of this file. Parliament’s position contained serious flaws, particularly the prolongation of free pollution permits until 2032, and potentially longer for exported products. Nevertheless, it was a small improvement on the Commission proposal, and the CBAM instrument is necessary to allow for a gradual end to the free allocation of pollution permits.I do not support the creation of a new EU own resource from CBAM revenues. These revenues should go to Member States and facilitate increased climate finance to low-income countries, whose industries may be negatively impacted by the CBAM.
Candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia (RC-B9-0331/2022, B9-0331/2022, B9-0332/2022, B9-0333/2022, B9-0334/2022, B9-0335/2022, B9-0336/2022)
I supported this resolution. In response to the brutal war Russia has unleashed against Ukraine, the EU has a role to play in reaching out and expressing solidarity. If these countries decide they would achieve more prosperity within the Union, then we should welcome them with open arms.The next step will be for the European Commission to work with these countries to ready them for entry. Entry to the EU is based on the Copenhagen criteria and requires the adoption and implementation of relevant reforms, notably in the areas of democracy, the rule of law and human rights.The EU should do its utmost to support these countries on their journey, in particular Ukraine, given the heavy toll Russia’s assault has inflicted on its people and economy.
Exceptional temporary support under EAFRD in response to the impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (C9-0185/2022)
Gas storage (C9-0126/2022 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
I abstained on this file. As Ireland does not have gas storage, or gas interconnectors with Member States that have gas storage, this Regulation does not apply to Ireland. In these cases, it is my practice to abstain and leave the deciding vote to the MEPs of countries that will be directly impacted by the legislation.
EU Digital COVID Certificate - Union citizens (A9-0138/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I voted in favour of this proposal to extend the application of the regulation by one year until June 2023 and to include the possibility for Member States to issue certificates on the basis of clinical trials.I welcome the criticisms the report makes of the domestic misuse of the certificate by Member States.
EU Digital COVID Certificate - third-country nationals (A9-0137/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
Draft amending budget No 3/2022: financing reception costs of people fleeing Ukraine (A9-0181/2022 - Karlo Ressler)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2022/001 FR/Air France - France (A9-0183/2022 - Fabienne Keller)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Antimicrobials or groups of antimicrobials reserved for treatment of certain infections in humans (B9-0327/2022)
I voted against this objection. While the motivation behind the objection came from a good place, the scientific consensus does not support this view. When this issue was first raised in 2021, the scientific advice from the EMA, the ECDC, the WHO and the WOAH came down firmly on the side of the Commission’s proposal. Completely reserving all important antimicrobials for human use would negatively impact animal care, and the exception for individual use proposed in the objection would create too much of a loophole and risk undermining the whole list of reserved antimicrobials.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize DP4114 × MON 810 × MIR604 × NK603 and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events DP4114, MON 810, MIR604 and NK603 (B9-0328/2022)
This vote objected to GM maize varieties being imported to the EU market. These GM maize varieties have been manipulated to be tolerant to glufosinate and glyphosate herbicides and produce insecticidal proteins (‘B toxins’). I supported this objection, which calls on the Commission to not authorise the import of herbicide-tolerant GM crops, due to the associated increased use of complementary herbicides.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combination T25 × DAS-40278-9 (B9-0326/2022)
This vote objected to GM maize varieties being imported to the EU market. These GM maize varieties have been manipulated to be tolerant to glufosinate and glyphosate herbicides and produce insecticidal proteins (‘B toxins’). I supported this objection, which calls on the Commission to not authorise the import of herbicide-tolerant GM crops, due to the associated increased use of complementary herbicides.
Renewal of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Federative Republic of Brazil (A9-0176/2022 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
I voted in favour of this file which proposes to renew for another five years the scientific and technological cooperation agreement between the EU and Brazil. This agreement allows for better scientific exchange, joint research projects and the creation of stronger ties between researchers and academics from both parties.
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: accession by the European Union (A9-0177/2022 - Sabrina Pignedoli)
I supported this recommendation that the EU sign up to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters. This convention will facilitate the recognition and enforcement of judgments among the EU Member States and other contracting states of the Convention. I believe this will provide legal certainty for companies in cross-border contracts.
Illegal logging in the EU (B9-0329/2022)
I voted in favour of this Resolution, which is based on a number of petitions about illegal logging in some EU countries – affecting some of the best-preserved (and last) primary forests in Europe. In addition. The resolution highlights how illegal trade of wood inside and outside EU is part of organised crime and affects the environment and local communities.
Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals (A9-0174/2022 - Barry Andrews, Petros Kokkalis)
I voted in favour of this report. The main goal of this report is to push the Agenda 2030 forward and to set out Parliament’s position in time before the next High Level Political Forum (HLPF), scheduled for July 2022. Among other things, the report stressed the need to implement the Council conclusions of 24 October 2019 on the economy of wellbeing.
Implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (A9-0171/2022 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, Siegfried Mureşan, Dragoş Pîslaru)
I abstained on this report. It is far too early to assess the impact of the RRF. The report failed to challenge the conditionality, often neo-liberal, in the programme. Member States should draw down their allocations and put them to maximum use in aiding the recovery and increasing the welfare of their people.
Inclusion measures within Erasmus+ 2014-2020 (A9-0158/2022 - Laurence Farreng)
2021 Report on Montenegro (A9-0151/2022 - Tonino Picula)
. ‒ I supported this text. I am in favour of Montenegro’s journey to join the EU. The report rightly highlights where more work is needed, in particular the independence of the judiciary and law enforcement, media freedom, advances in LGBTIQ rights, implementation of the Istanbul Convention, respect for minorities and civil society. It is important to note that I am not in agreement that Montenegro is required to align to the EU’s foreign affairs policy if it is to be admitted. Ireland should be a strong voice for those countries who wish to control their own foreign affairs policy.
Future of EU-Africa trade relations (A9-0169/2022 - Helmut Scholz)
. ‒ I supported this report. The report contained many important messages regarding our trading relationship with the continent of Africa. These included the right of African countries to food sovereignty, the development of the African economy away from the export of raw materials, achievement of the SDGs and the Paris Agreement, and the need to insert binding chapters on sustainable development in agreements.
Future of EU international investment policy (A9-0166/2022 - Anna Cavazzini)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this report. The report provided a comprehensive criticism of EU trade policy. It noted the failure of the ISDS system and that the new ICS system is not the reform that is required. The report asked the Commission to exclude fossil fuel investors, speculators and financial instruments. Finally, the report gave support to the UN binding treaty on business and human rights and called for an exit from the Energy Charter Treaty.
Digital Services Act (A9-0356/2021 - Christel Schaldemose)
. – I voted in favour of the Digital Services Act, which lays down rules for online intermediary services (particularly platforms), intended to counter illegal activities, improve traceability and transparency, and increase oversight of digital markets. This new step in the legislation of online services includes a ban on targeted advertising for minors, a horizontal framework for dealing with illegal content online, fewer loopholes for medium-sized enterprises and an obligation for transparency around platforms’ algorithmic systems.
Digital Markets Act (A9-0332/2021 - Andreas Schwab)
. – I voted in favour of the Digital Services Act, which lays down obligations and prohibitions for the largest ‘gatekeeper’ platforms, e.g. around inter-operability, use of data by business users, portability of data, and a ban on self-preferencing methods. While the trilogue result is not as ambitious as the parliament’s original position, it is still much better than the status quo and will limit the power of big tech companies. Important elements include restrictions on dark patterns (tricking users into unintended choices), interoperability requirements, the possibility for Commission to temporarily block takeovers and improved protection of whistle-blowers.
Adoption by Croatia of the euro on 1 January 2023 (A9-0187/2022 - Siegfried Mureşan)
. – I support the approval to Croatia joining the euro that this report gives. My support is based on the fact that Croatia as a sovereign country meets the relevant criteria and has decided through its own constitutional method that it wishes to join the euro. That is enough for me.I do hope that the euro they are joining will not bring with it the misguided and dangerous rules that went with it before the current suspension of the fiscal rules. There is now a window open for the Commission to propose and Member States to support a radical redesign of the fiscal rules so that membership of the euro doesn’t mean being legally obliged to follow pro-cyclical policies that make recessions deeper and longer.
EU/Cook Islands Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: implementation protocol (A9-0197/2022 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
Temporary trade liberalisation measures for Moldova (A9-0201/2022 - Markéta Gregorová)
Women’s poverty in Europe (A9-0194/2022 - Lina Gálvez Muñoz)
. – I voted in favour of this report, which highlights that the risk of poverty and social exclusion is higher for women than for men, and that this gap has increased in most Member States since 2017. It also introduces the concept of ‘time poverty’, referring to women’s lack of free time after employment, care work and studies are taken into account. It underlines the poverty faced by (mostly female-headed) single-parent households and the resulting impact on children, and highlights the intersecting factors influencing the poverty faced by Roma women, older women, disabled women and other marginalised groups. The report calls on Member States to ensure adequate financial protection, including access to pension schemes, for those in irregular employment or care work. It calls on Member States to tackle precarious work, often performed by women, e.g. by restricting precarious contracts, and says that the Commission should refrain from adopting any policies that would lead to an increase in precarious work conditions.
Negotiations for a cooperation agreement between the EU and Interpol (A9-0200/2022 - Jadwiga Wiśniewska)
. – I supported this mandate for a cooperation agreement between the EU and Interpol. This is a proportionate approach to cooperation, allowing for the consultation of Interpol databases on, for example, stolen and lost travel documents. I welcome the requirements and safeguards to ensure that the EU data acquis and all data-related rights of individuals are upheld by the Commission in the negotiation.
Indo-Pacific strategy in the area of trade and investment (A9-0170/2022 - Jan Zahradil)
EU-India future trade and investment cooperation (A9-0193/2022 - Geert Bourgeois)
. – I abstained on this vote, as I am concerned that the model used is about dismantling national economic protections to the greatest extent. I am concerned this will not benefit small to medium producers in India. Sinn Féin believes we need a new model of trade agreements that are built on protections for small to medium businesses, workers and the environment, rather than investment courts and neo-liberalisation.
Common European action on care (A9-0189/2022 - Milan Brglez, Sirpa Pietikäinen)
Mental health in the digital world of work (A9-0184/2022 - Maria Walsh)
. – I supported this report on mental health in the digital world of work, which looked into the consequences of the increasing shift toward digital workplaces, including teleworking (exacerbated by the COVID—19 pandemic) and the introduction of new technologies such as artificial intelligence, on workers and their mental health.
Banking Union – annual report 2021 (A9-0186/2022 - Bogdan Rzońca)
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Amending the Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act and the Taxonomy Disclosures Delegated Act (B9-0338/2022)
. – I voted in favour of this objection, as the decision to include certain gas and nuclear activities in the sustainable finance taxonomy was a political choice and not based on scientific fact. The purpose of the taxonomy was to redirect investment towards sustainable activities, not keep it within fossil fuel sectors that are currently very well resourced. The Commission and certain Member States then hijacked the Taxonomy, ascribing it with a transition management role that it was never intended to have, and which is not in the underlying legislation. This move was a mistake and risks undermining the validity of the entire Taxonomy.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Technical standards for the application of position limits to commodity derivatives and procedures for applying for exemption from position limits (B9-0345/2022)
. – I supported this objection. The Commission adopted the delegated regulation on 20 April 2022 that sets out the methodology for calculating position limits without taking into consideration the current market developments, nor assessing the potential impact of the changes of the position limit regime on financial market activities.The impact of this regulation will be to encourage more speculation on food commodities.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Crisis measures in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors (A9-0182/2022 - Nuno Melo)
. – I voted in favour of this proposal, which aims to amend some provisions in the EMFF to allow Member States to adopt measures to alleviate the consequences of the war, which has led to a direct interruption of fishing activities in the Black Sea. The war has compounded the problems already experienced by the sector for a long time, in particular the increase in production costs, in particular fuel costs.
2021 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (A9-0188/2022 - Paulo Rangel)
. – I voted in favour of this report. The report supports Bosnia and Herzegovina’s journey to join the European Union, while pointing out areas where improvements are needed, such as human rights, the judicial system and tackling corruption. The report also contained important language on the need to maintain peace in the country.
2021 Report on Serbia (A9-0178/2022 - Vladimír Bilčík)
. – I voted in favour of this report. The report supports Serbia’s journey to join the European Union, while pointing out areas where improvements are needed, such as human rights, the judicial system and tackling corruption. It is important to note that I do not agree with the notion that all countries who wish to join the European Union must strictly adopt its foreign affairs policy. Ireland is an EU Member State who strongly defends its right to be a member of the EU but be militarily neutral. This type of conditionality should not be imposed on Serbia.
The EU and the defence of multilateralism (A9-0172/2022 - Javi López)
. – I abstained on this report. I agreed with the general theme of the report, which is the promotion of multilateralism. However, I could not support the report because it spoke about setting up multinational military units, focusing cooperation mostly on countries who we see as like-minded instead of trying to build a truly broad alliance, and it called on the EU to be a more assertive global actor. Sinn Féin believes the Irish Government, not the EU, should decide on this level of foreign policy.
Addressing food security in developing countries (A9-0195/2022 - Beata Kempa)
. – I supported this own initiative report, which called on the EU to implement policies that guarantee the right to food security and sovereignty in developing countries. An objective of the SDGs, which is far from being achieved due to the ongoing war and its consequences on the food supply chain and the financial speculation on food prices.
EU action plan for the social economy (A9-0192/2022 - Jordi Cañas)
. – I supported this report, which is the Parliament's response to the Commission's action plan for the social economy. Among other things, the report highlighted the importance of the social economy and called on the Member States to set up local social economy contact points with a view to raising awareness of and facilitating access to support and funding.
Intersectional discrimination in the EU: socio-economic situation of women of African, Middle-Eastern, Latin-American and Asian descent (A9-0190/2022 - Alice Kuhnke)
. – I voted in favour of this report. It was a solid report, covering not just racial and gender discrimination but also the many other intersections of discrimination. It gives a comprehensive definition of an intersectional approach and says that it has been missing from EU policies to date, but that eliminating all forms of discrimination is a precondition to achieving gender equality.
National vetoes to undermine the global tax deal (RC-B9-0339/2022, B9-0339/2022, B9-0340/2022, B9-0341/2022, B9-0342/2022, B9-0343/2022, B9-0344/2022)
. – I defend totally the maintaining of unanimity at EU level on matters relating to tax.I also want to state my support for the OECD deal and the EU Directive implementing it.There is no doubt that Hungary is being cynical in opposing the deal. It is reneging on its word. All those that signed up to the OECD deal in the EU and across the world, including the United States should implement this deal as soon as possible.However, the Hungarian Government is not the only one being cynical. Those who seek to end tax sovereignty are using one Member State’s cynicism to cynically advance their own agenda.We should not throw away the rulebook, just because there is a temporary political problem. There is no need to take out a sledge hammer when faced with a nut.Unanimity is not a block to progress. It is a safeguard of democratic decision-making. Sinn Féin rejects centralisation of tax powers and defends unanimity on such crucial matters.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: Temporary measures concerning driver documents issued by Ukraine (C9-0201/2022)
. – I voted in favour of this proposal, which would allow Ukrainian citizens who are currently residing in EU Member States under the temporary protection regime, to continue to use their Ukrainian driving license without the need to exchange it for an EU driving license or to sit a new driving test.
Identification of the violation of Union restrictive measures as crimes under Article 83(1) of the TFEU (C9-0219/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar) (vote)
. – I voted against including sanctions in the list of serious crimes covered. Breach of sanctions cannot be compared to trafficking in human beings, illicit drugs and arms trafficking, organised crime, and other serious crimes already covered. I object to the fact that there was no Parliamentary scrutiny, no impact assessment, no opinion from the Fundamental Rights Agency. In addition to which there are increasing numbers of sanctions, some of which Ireland may not agree with, but the breach of which would oblige us to deal with as serious crime.
Sustainable aviation fuels (ReFuelEU Aviation Initiative) (A9-0199/2022 - Søren Gade)
. – As part of the ‘Fit for 55’ package of proposals, the ReFuel EU Aviation initiative aims to boost the supply and demand for sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) in the EU, in line with the goal of reducing aviation’s environmental footprint to achieve the EU’s climate targets. Whilst I agreed with much of what was in the report, I abstained on the final vote due to the reports definition of sustainable aviation fuels being too broad.
Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2021 (A9-0165/2022 - David Cormand)
Protection of the EU’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2020 (A9-0175/2022 - Katalin Cseh)
US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the United States and the need to safeguard abortion rights and Women’s health in the EU (B9-0365/2022, B9-0366/2022, B9-0367/2022)
. – I voted in favour of the resolution on the US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the United States. The resolution highlighted that the US Supreme Court’s decision will most negatively impact disadvantaged and marginalised women, and that it will increase the risk of women undergoing dangerous, and even deadly, illegal abortions.
Conclusion of the amendments to the International Sugar Agreement, 1992 (A9-0229/2022 - Bernd Lange)
. ‒ While I support addressing the imbalance between the number of votes and financial contributions of members and their position on the world sugar market, there were legitimate concerns on the issue of replacing food crops with sugar crops in promoting other sugar-related products, notably bioethanol. Any drive to replace biodiversity and food production with such sugar products, could put both food availability and affordability at risk. That is why I voted against.
EU/Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution 2017-2021. Extension of the Protocol (A9-0211/2022 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
Draft amending budget No 2/2022: entering the surplus of the financial year 2021 (A9-0226/2022 - Karlo Ressler)
Amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation in the area of resolution (“daisy chain” proposal) (A9-0020/2022 - Jonás Fernández)
I opposed this report as I see it as part of a deregulation agenda being pursued. It weakens the capital requirements of some banks by allowing them to deduct capital held in subsidiary banks. This, in theory under certain circumstances, could lead to not enough capital being available in the event of a crisis.
Responsible private funding of litigation (A9-0218/2022 - Axel Voss)
I voted in favour of this report on Commercial third party litigation funding (TPLF). The report proposed to introduce regulations on the practice of the TPLF, in accordance with the legal traditions and autonomy of the Member States. The report noted that it is for each Member State to determine whether, and to what extent, the provision of litigation funding should be permitted within its own legal system.
Interim report on the 2021 proposal for a revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (A9-0227/2022 - Jan Olbrycht, Margarida Marques)
New EU Forest Strategy for 2030 – Sustainable Forest Management in Europe (A9-0225/2022 - Ulrike Müller)
The report recognises the benefits of an EU forestry strategy for promoting conservation, sustainable forestry management and tackling illegal logging, which I support in addition to better incentives being made available to Irish farmers seeking to diversify into forestry. However, the report promotes woody biomass as a bioenergy and as a better alternative to fossil fuel which is inaccurate and does not paint the full picture. Cutting down large swathes of forests, especially old-growth forests, which are habitats with large carbon sequestration ability, for bioenergy in order to reduce the use of fossil fuels and emissions, is counter-productive, which is why I abstained.
Deforestation Regulation (A9-0219/2022 - Christophe Hansen)
Thacaigh mé leis an Rialacháin maidir le Dífhoraoisiú an tseachtain seo chaite. Bhí mé sásta le toradh an vóta; is téacs láidir atá ann agus tá súil agam go gcoimeádfar na pointí dearfacha le linn na hidirbheartaíochta leis na Ballstáit. Tá roinnt pointí an-tábhachtach ann, mar shampla cosaint cearta daonna agus chearta na bpobal dúchais, agus go mbeidh ar na bainc agus sealbhóirí a chinntiú nach bhfuil siad ag tabhairt amach aon mhaoiniú atá dul i dtreo an dífhoraoisithe freisin. Mhol mé na pointí sin nuair a rinne an Coiste Talmhaíocht plé ar an rialacháin seo le linn an earraigh, agus táim an-sásta go gcoimeádtar iad sa téacs.
Conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO) (A9-0198/2022 - Isabel Carvalhais)
The impact of COVID-19 closures of educational, cultural, youth and sports activities on children and young people in the EU (A9-0216/2022 - Hannes Heide)
I voted in favour of this Own Initiative Report, which looks at the mental health crisis that young people across Europe are currently facing as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic.The report explores how young people were affected by the closure of facilities in education, sports, cultural, etc., and draws attention to the role played by formal and non-formal learning institutions in providing young people and their families with the necessary material and psychological support.
Energy efficiency (recast) (A9-0221/2022 - Niels Fuglsang)
I voted in favour of this recast of the energy efficiency directive, which seeks to increase the efforts of Member States to reduce energy consumption. Energy efficiency is crucial for reaching the EU’s climate goals, and can also contribute to important social goals such as the eradication of energy poverty and the provision of accessible, widely available public transport.
Adequate minimum wages in the European Union (A9-0325/2021 - Dennis Radtke, Agnes Jongerius)
Renewable Energy Directive (A9-0208/2022 - Markus Pieper)
I abstained on the final vote of this file. While I fully support increased renewable energy ambition, the loopholes around biomass and biofuels introduced by the Parliament compromised the text too much. Under the RED, woody biomass has so far been considered a renewable form of energy, meaning that it can access RE subsidies and that Member States can count energy from woody biomass towards their renewable energy targets. However, increasing scientific evidence is showing that the burning of primary woody biomass (full logs and stumps rather than residues) emits more CO2 per unit of energy than most other fuels. Cutting down forests for energy also damages biodiversity and reduces the carbon sink. To date, the RED has encouraged the production of crop-based biofuels that compete with food crops and contribute to land use change that is destructive to biodiversity. While biofuels are pertinent to the energy transition in small quantities (when produced from waste and residues), this use needs to be capped to avoid negative unintended impacts.The increased 2030 target of 45% is welcome, but is not a major victory seeing as this will become the target anyway, based on the recent RePower EU proposal.
Renewed partnership with the Southern Neighbourhood – a new agenda for the Mediterranean (A9-0220/2022 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
I voted in favour of this report. There are some very good aspects to this report, such as the pursuit of migration policies that fully respect the human rights of migrants and refugees as enshrined in international, regional and national laws. Other positive aspects include multilateral cooperation to tackle and fight climate change, alleviating poverty, combatting violence against women, freedom of expression, and last but not least, solidarity with the people of Palestine.
The new European Bauhaus (A9-0213/2022 - Christian Ehler, Marcos Ros Sempere)
Macro-financial assistance to Ukraine (C9-0303/2022)
I voted in favour of this proposal. Ukraine’s economy is in ruins due to the war Russia has cruelly unleashed against it. The EU must facilitate Ukraine’s economic recovery in every way possible. I hope this assistance will result in much-needed money flowing into the Ukrainian economy to keep people paid and essential services going.
Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (A9-0217/2022 - Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield)
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2020 and 2021 (A9-0224/2022 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
This is a good report, which I voted in favour of.It denounces the backtracking on the rights of women and LGBTIQ persons, the violation of fundamental rights of refugees, migrants and asylum seekers, Romani people, detainees and prisoners, and journalists. It also states that as a consequence of the pandemic, poverty and social exclusion, as well as hate speech and hate crime, have increased.
Economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report (A9-0210/2022 - Constanze Krehl)
I welcomed this report.The 8th Cohesion Report showed that the North & West region has slipped in relative terms from being a ‘developed region’ to a region ‘in transition’. It begs the question, in transition to what? The government must tackle this crisis with an investment package to address this trap. I have consistently made the case that this investment package could be at least part-funded through use of various EU tools.
EU border regions: living labs of European integration (A9-0222/2022 - Younous Omarjee)
I supported this report. It quite correctly points out the major disadvantages that border regions face – something I am more than familiar with.The Irish border situation is a case in point. The report makes positive suggestions as to how address some of these issues that might be useful. The ending of partition, however, will be the solution and all who wish to end problems associated with the border should concentrate on ending the existence of the border through political means.
Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (A9-0223/2022 - Rainer Wieland, Charles Goerens)
Implementation of the Updated New Industrial Strategy for Europe: aligning spending to policy (A9-0214/2022 - Tom Berendsen)
I voted against this Own Initiative Report in response to the updated New Industrial Strategy. I do not feel that it added anything of great value to the Commission’s Strategy, as it maintained a very market-centric approach and only presented the public sector as a source of funds rather than a serious actor in industrial activities and relations. It did not reflect the huge transformation needed to decarbonise our industries. Furthermore, it stressed the importance of the autonomy of the EU’s arms industry and encouraged more public funding of the defence industry.
Consequences of drought, fire, and other extreme weather phenomena: increasing EU's efforts to fight climate change (RC-B9-0384/2022, B9-0384/2022, B9-0391/2022, B9-0393/2022, B9-0403/2022, B9-0404/2022, B9-0405/2022)
This resolution outlines the climate change impacts which Europe faced this summer, which are leading to water shortages, pressure on agriculture and soil quality, and health impacts. In response to these new realities, the resolution proposed a series of adaption measures to be implemented alongside ambitious climate change mitigation actions.These adaptation measures cover water management, urban greening policies, nature restoration and the better coordination of crisis response mechanisms. There are also important references for the need for the EU to support climate adaptation around the world through international climate financing. I was happy to support this resolution.
The situation in the Strait of Taiwan (RC-B9-0389/2022, B9-0389/2022, B9-0392/2022, B9-0394/2022, B9-0396/2022, B9-0398/2022, B9-0400/2022)
This resolution, whilst expressing support for the ‘One China’ policy, the position of Ireland and the EU, still advocates actions that are contradictory to this position and peaceful cooperation and diplomacy in addressing tensions in the Taiwan Strait, such as specifically aiming to strengthening an EU ‘Bilateral Investment Agreement’ (BIA) with Taiwan that raises issue on grounds of subsidiarity. For this reason, I abstained.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (A9-0253/2021 - Joanna Kopcińska)
Serious cross-border threats to health (A9-0247/2021 - Véronique Trillet-Lenoir)
I voted in favour of this report, which is for a framework to govern EU-level action on preparedness, surveillance, risk assessment, early warning of and response to serious cross-border threats to health. Among some of the proposals are that the Commission should facilitate the stress tests, exercises and in-action and after-action reviews with Member States.
Striving for a sustainable and competitive EU aquaculture: the way forward (A9-0215/2022 - Clara Aguilera)
I voted in favour of this report. I believe that sustainable aquaculture, with the consent and support of local stakeholders and communities, is a fantastic way of encouraging inward investment, socio—economic development, economic diversification and job creation for rural communities throughout Ireland, especially coastal fishing communities that have had fishing access cut and have been negatively impacted by Brexit. I also emphasise that aquaculture sites, whether they are salmon, mussel farms, etc., that are planned and established in open water do not conflict with fishing zones or the conservation objectives of protected areas. On this basis, aquaculture should not also jeopardise wild fish stocks and species.
Impact of new technologies on taxation: crypto and blockchain (A9-0204/2022 - Lídia Pereira)
I abstained on this report.The use of crypto— and blockchain—based assets creates new challenges for tax authorities. While the report did advance some modest suggestions around how to co-operate it fundamentally failed to identify the huge issues crypto-assets – some of which define themselves by their privacy – create for tax collection.The report took too much influence from the industry and not enough from the point of view of society’s needs.
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) Area of Competence (A9-0312/2021 - Gabriel Mato)
The Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) is the regional fisheries management organisation (RFMO) responsible for the management of tuna and tuna-like resources in the Indian Ocean.This proposal aims to include measures for the management and conservation of tuna in the Indian Ocean, and mitigation measures for marine turtles caught by certain fishing gears. There are also requirements for information on vessels fishing for tuna and swordfish, etc..I voted in favour.
Flexible Assistance to Territories (FAST-CARE) (A9-0232/2022 - Niklas Nienaß)
Radio Equipment Directive: common charger for electronic devices (A9-0129/2022 - Alex Agius Saliba)
I was happy to support the introduction of a common charger for electronic devices. This is an important step for consumers and for the planet. It will give consumers more choice and allow them to reduce their electronic waste. The European Parliament drew attention to the fact that this legislation must be flexible enough to allow for the development of new technologies, and to take further steps towards charger unbundling to reduce electronic waste. These are important aspects to keep an eye on in the future, to ensure that this progressive new law continues to work for consumers.
AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market (A9-0209/2022 - Katrin Langensiepen)
I voted in favour of this report on the establishment of the AccessibleEU Centre. The centre will be a cooperation framework bringing together national authorities to better harmonise accessibility practices and share knowledge. The report stressed the need for broad stakeholder involvement in the work of the centre, including from academics and civil society organisations. I hope that the work of the centre will improve the mainstreaming of accessibility in goods and services offered in the EU, and help work toward the goals of the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities.
EU Customs Single Window (A9-0279/2021 - Ivan Štefanec)
I voted in favour of this new law, which will allow traders in the EU to submit one set of documents online to comply with a variety of reporting obligations to different customs authorities. It will also link systems operated at national level (e.g. customs) with those operated at EU level (e.g. licensing schemes). It will make it easier for traders to fulfil their customs obligations but also for national authorities to have oversight of the information submitted. It may also facilitate access of businesses in the six counties of Northern Ireland to the EU Single Market, by reducing the amount of paperwork they must produce.
Amending Annexes IV and V to Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 on persistent organic pollutants (A9-0092/2022 - Martin Hojsík)
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are toxic organic substances that take a long time to break down, meaning that they can remain present in the environment, food chain and even in our bodies. Some examples of POPs are certain pesticides and industrial chemicals. Health impacts of POPs include cancer, reproductive disorders, damage to the nervous system and immune system disruption. The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (which Ireland has ratified) establishes control measures to address POPs. The ‘POPs Regulation’ implements the EU’s commitments under the Stockholm Convention.This amending regulation concerns POPs and waste disposal, changing some of the thresholds for how certain waste pollutants should be treated, to bring them in line with the latest scientific evidence under the Stockholm Convention. While the final text agreed by the co-legislators is not as ambitious as the Parliament’s original stance, I voted in favour as it is nevertheless an improvement on the current situation.
Situation of Roma people living in settlements in the EU (B9-0413/2022)
I supported this resolution which comes on the back of two oral questions on the situation of marginalised Roma communities living in settlements in the EU. It also comes as a follow-up to an EMPL Committee mission to Slovakia, where MEPs raised concerns about the extremely precarious conditions of Roma communities there.Among other things, the resolution urges the Member States to support wage transparency and ethnic- and gender-neutral job evaluations, calls for concrete measures to end school segregation and to combat anti-gypsyism and promote diversity in the workplace.
Key objectives for the CITES CoP19 meeting in Panama (B9-0414/2022)
I voted in favour of this resolution. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) aims to ensure that the trade of animals and plants does not threaten the survival of that species in the wild. The 19th Conference of Parties to CITES will take place in Panama in November. This resolution sets a strong mandate for the EU’s participation in the COP19, placing the convention in the context of rapid biodiversity loss, and also the risk of zoonotic diseases posed by unregulated transport of animals. It also calls for an EU-wide ban on the import of hunting trophies of CITES-listed species and gives species-specific recommendations on sharks, rays, big cats, elephants, hippos, turtles, glass frogs, rhinos, pangolins and totoaba fish.
The EU’s strategic relationship and partnership with the Horn of Africa (A9-0207/2022 - Fabio Massimo Castaldo)
I voted in favour of this report as I strongly support building and continuing peace and reconciliation efforts in the region, promoting conditions suitable for sustainable socio-economic development to reduce disparity between the Global South and Global North. I also support the report’s call for support strategies to foster inclusive reconciliation processes with the aim of establishing credible and representative institutions that provide for the participation of the various communities, something that we in Sinn Féin wholeheartedly pursue and support in the north of Ireland, and abroad.
Slot utilisation rules at Union airports: temporary relief (C9-0225/2022 - Dominique Riquet) (vote)
Due to COVID-19 airline operators were given derogation to ‘use-it-or-lose-it’ rule to airport slot allocation in order to prevent flights without passengers taking off just for the sake of maintaining airport slots for post-pandemic era. This newest derogation will allow the airline slot regime to respond more flexibly to unexpected developments in the near future. This proposal is to return to the standard slot use rate of 75% (from currently 64% for the summer 2022 scheduling season) as of 30 October 2022, but at the same time, to prolong the possibility to make use of the justified non-use of slots (JNUS) tool created during the COVID-19 pandemic. I supported this proposal.
The death of Mahsa Amini and the repression of women's rights protesters in Iran (B9-0425/2022, RC-B9-0434/2022, B9-0434/2022, B9-0435/2022, B9-0436/2022, B9-0439/2022, B9-0442/2022, B9-0455/2022)
Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression against Ukraine (RC-B9-0430/2022/REV, B9-0430/2022, B9-0432/2022, B9-0433/2022, B9-0438/2022, B9-0446/2022) (vote)
I voted in favour of this resolution to express Sinn Féin’s full solidarity with the people of Ukraine, and condemn the brutal escalation of violence by Putin's regime. We in Sinn Féin also unequivocally condemn the illegal and illegitimate sham referendums conducted that were forced upon people of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia which were conducted in violation of the UN Charter and international law. Sinn Féin rejects and does not recognise the fabricated results of the referendums and the illegitimate annexations. Russia's actions constitutes a dangerous and irresponsible escalation and a blatant violation of international law and the UN Charter guaranteeing international peace, security, territorial integrity and the sovereignty of all states. It is also important to emphasise that Ireland's long-standing tradition of neutrality, and the EU, international community and the Irish government respect providing humanitarian and non-lethal assistance to those suffering invasion and foreign occupation such as the people of Ukraine. I once again reiterate the support of my party in the strongest possible terms to the Ukrainian people.
Outcome of the Commission’s review of the 15-point action plan on trade and sustainable development (B9-0415/2022)
The Commission issued its 15-point action plan on trade and sustainable development in 2018, requiring the inclusion of Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) chapters of the EU’s free trade agreements. To date, these chapters were quite tokenistic as they were not enforceable. In June 2022, the Commission presented a communication to strengthen the TSD chapters. The new communication proposes enforcement mechanisms for commitments on labour rights and environmental issues in FTAs, as well as monitoring roles for civil society.The new proposal is that both parties to a FTA will be obliged to implement the ILO conventions, Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the Paris Agreement. Serious non-compliance can be faced with trade sanctions. It is missing a requirement for roadmaps and verifiable objectives in FTAs, and does not have concrete commitments on human rights other than labour rights. This resolution largely endorses the Commission’s proposal, without particularly seeking to address its shortcomings. Nevertheless, it is a step in the right direction, and so I voted in favour.
An EU approach for Space Traffic management - an EU contribution addressing a global challenge (B9-0423/2022)
This resolution explores the issue of the need for a European and International Space Traffic Management framework.Among other things, the resolution stresses the need to promote an internationally recognised definition of STM in order to ensure a common understanding of all parameters and thereby contribute to the safety of space operations in increasingly congested outer space.The resolution also calls on the Commission to take both civilian and defence/security needs into consideration, to evaluate the impact of STM development on European public and private stakeholders, and to consult interested stakeholders from outside the EU.Whilst I agree there needs to be an internationally agreed Space Traffic Management framework, this resolution offers private and military interests too much influence over the designing of any such proposal. Therefore, I voted against.
Momentum for the Ocean: strengthening Ocean Governance and Biodiversity (B9-0426/2022)
I supported this resolution. A healthy marine environment is critical for coastal tourism in rural Ireland, and the long-term sustainability of fish stocks, and I recognise that MPAs can play a role in this. In this context, it is important to give due regard to a healthy marine environment and healthy coastal communities. However, it is critical that Irish coastal communities and stakeholders, such as fishers, are properly compensated and consulted on proposed conservation measures that may have a negative socio-economic impact. Sinn Féin supports such compensation, yet the Irish Government and European Commission neglect to do so.
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A9-0243/2022 - Alicia Homs Ginel)
In 2022, the guidelines for employment policies were amended to align them to the post-COVID 19 environment, green transition, etc.I voted in favour of this proposal, as it aims to give further attention to disadvantaged groups, gender equality, the fight against poverty (especially child poverty), social exclusion and homelessness, etc. The proposals also highlight the need to respect and strengthen the role of the social partners, promote the extension of the collective bargaining coverage, and support a high trade union density in order to ensure an inclusive and socially just recovery.
Discharge 2020: EU general budget - Council and European Council (A9-0236/2022 - Isabel García Muñoz)
I rejected the discharge for the Council for the same reasons my colleagues have done so for years including earlier this year.The Council refuses to accept that it should answer questions about its finances. This is an intolerable situation and they should change their position in the interest of transparency.
Discharge 2020: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A9-0238/2022 - Isabel García Muñoz)
I voted against the discharge of the European Economic and Social Committee, due to the continued lack of satisfactory action on harassment and bullying incidents. The administration’s response to past harassment cases has been inefficient: some of these are yet to be resolved and that the secretary general is still yet to admit to internal shortcomings and a breach in the administration’s duty of care. EESC staff still complain that there has not been a real change to improve working conditions in this regard.
Discharge 2020: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (A9-0235/2022 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112 (2) and (3): Active substances, including 8-hydroxyquinoline, chlorotoluron and difenoconazole (B9-0460/2022)
I supported this objection, which opposes the procedural extension of authorisation for a range of chemicals without going through the necessary scientific checks. The Commission has taken to regularly extending authorisation periods for chemicals by implementing act with no assessment: this process is supposed to be the exception, not the rule. For some of the chemicals up for extension, new scientific evidence has come to light which demands an updated assessment. Since it was first authorised, chlorotoluron has been identified as an endocrine disrupter and toxic to aquatic life. Difenoconazole has been found to severely contribute to the development of resistance to medicines, and 8-hydroxyquinoline has been classified as a reproductive toxin by the ECHA. The Commission must perform all appropriate assessments before considering an extended authorisation for these chemicals.
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023 - all sections (A9-0241/2022 - Nicolae Ştefănuță, Niclas Herbst)
I supported the EP position on the budget this year because the massive cost of living crisis and the war in Ukraine merit additional spending.In general, Sinn Féin do not support larger budgets for the sake of an expanded EU but targeted additional spending to ease the cost of living crisis, aid the Ukrainian people fleeing an unprovoked and brutal war, and the ongoing impact of COVID-19 requires investment and spending.
Sustainable maritime fuels (FuelEU Maritime Initiative) (A9-0233/2022 - Jörgen Warborn)
This proposal for a regulation is part of the Commission’s ‘Fit for 55’ climate package. The aim is to introduce a harmonised regulatory framework in the EU to increase the share of renewable and low-carbon fuels in the fuel mix of international maritime transport. I voted against this report as it presented far less ambition than what was proposed by the associated committees. I also voted against these proposals as they were not in line with previous more progressive positions the parliament has taken, most notably on the RED and ETS.
Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (A9-0234/2022 - Ismail Ertug)
The proposed Regulation on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and repealing Directive 2014/94/EU (AFIR) is a Fit for 55 file, which seeks to provide for the timely installation of (mostly) electric recharging facilities in Member States to serve roads (for LDVs and HDVs), TEN-T ports and TEN-T airports.I voted in favour the proposal, which also includes articles regarding the provision of hydrogen refuelling facilities. The road charging and refuelling facilities must be publicly accessible, and AFIR also aims to ensure the interoperability of such infrastructure across the EU and provide greater transparency for consumers.
Specific provisions for the 2014-2020 cooperation programmes, following programme implementation disruption (C9-0289/2022 - Michael Gahler)
The Rule of Law in Malta, five years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia (B9-0470/2022, B9-0471/2022)
Five years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia, I voted in favour of this resolution, which pays tribute to Daphne and her essential work in exposing corruption and holding those involved in illegal activities to account. While acknowledging the progress made by the Maltese Government lately in relation to the rule of law, the motion calls on the Maltese authorities to implement all the recommendations of the public inquiry into Daphne’s murder.
Growing hate crimes against LGBTIQ people across Europe in light of the recent homophobic murder in Slovakia (B9-0476/2022, B9-0477/2022)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which came in the wake of the murder of two young people outside an LGBT+ bar in Bratislava. Their killer was specifically targeting the LGBT+ community and Slovak police are classing the murders as a terrorist attack. The resolution calls on the Slovak Government to take meaningful action to protect the LGBT+ community from hate crimes, and to fight against disinformation about sexual and gender identity. It calls out the sense of impunity that enables anti-LGBT+ hate speech and hate crimes in many Member States, and stresses the need for Member States to proactively address and prosecute hate crimes. LGBTIQ+ people, and all minority groups, must be able to live their lives free from persecution and hate crimes.
UN Climate Change Conference 2022 in Sharm-el-Sheikh, Egypt (COP27) (B9-0461/2022)
. ‒ The 27th meeting of the Parties to the UNFCCC will take place in Egypt from 6 to 18 November. This resolution sets out the Parliament’s stance on the COP27 negotiations. It is a strong text that touches on a range of issues like biodiversity protection, reducing methane emissions, climate adaptation, ending deforestation, the rights of indigenous peoples, ending fossil fuel subsidies, and gender equality. For the first time, Parliament has supported a loss-and-damage financing facility. The resolution also insists on the responsibility the EU bears for ensuring that targets for international climate finance are met. I was happy to vote in favour of this resolution.
Cultural solidarity with Ukraine and a joint emergency response mechanism for cultural recovery in Europe (B9-0473/2022)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this resolution, which assessed the impact the Russian invasion of Ukraine has had on the cultural sector. It considers the risks and safety of and to artists and cultural workers, journalists and academics and as a consequence, spreading a climate of fear and disbelief to the detriment of freedom of the arts, quality news, media independence and access to information, academic freedom and freedom of expression in the wider sense.
The situation in Burkina Faso following the coup d’état (RC-B9-0464/2022, B9-0464/2022, B9-0465/2022, B9-0466/2022, B9-0467/2022, B9-0468/2022, B9-0469/2022)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution on the situation in Burkina Faso following the coup d’état as it calls for more financial support and humanitarian aid, condemns the military coup of 30 September 2022 in Burkina Faso and also condemns the use of sexual violence, particularly against women and children.
Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence: Second Additional Protocol (A9-0002/2023 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I voted in favour of this report.The Budapest Convention is one of the most important international instruments for law enforcement.I support the accession of the EU to the Second Additional Protocol to the Budapest Convention – the Cybercrime Convention.From a data protection point of view Member States should make every effort to ensure that the Convention is implemented in a way that ensures it is used for legitimate crime detection and prevention and is not open to abuse by authoritarian regimes around the world.
Shipments of waste (A9-0290/2022 - Pernille Weiss)
I voted in favour of this report, which aims to tackle the problem of waste exports to other countries that may not be able to manage that waste. When this happens, it has hugely negative impacts for the environment and people’s health in these countries. This new law prohibits the export of waste outside of the EU for dumping and landfilling. It also sets stricter rules for waste that is exported to be reused, recycled or incinerated, which can only be sent to countries with a verified capacity to deal with the waste in a sustainable and healthy way. Parliament’s position adds a further ban on the export of plastic waste to all countries by 2023–2024, which will provide an incentive for EU countries to tackle our plastic addiction at source, rather than dumping it on other countries.
Rules to prevent the misuse of shell entities for tax purposes (A9-0293/2022 - Lídia Pereira)
I was happy to support this report as it signalled the EP’s political support for action to crack down on the use of shell companies to avoid tax. It is important that Member States work together to prevent tax avoidance. The new rules when adopted will, among other things, allow governments to define and sanction some of the shell entities and improve exchange of information between Member States concerning those shell entities.
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure concerning Rule 7 on defence of privileges and immunity and Rule 9 on procedures on immunity (A9-0001/2023 - Gabriele Bischoff)
The creation of a European Capital of Local Trade (B9-0003/2023)
I supported this resolution which called on the Commission to develop the proposal to create a European Capital of Local Trade and Retail. The resolution also recognises that retail SMEs are crucial for urban and rural local communities and that they form part of the social fabric, along with contributing directly to maintaining town and city centres as vibrant areas.
30th Anniversary of the Single Market (B9-0004/2023)
I voted in favour of this resolution. While EU law often prioritises the single market over the rights of ordinary people, in the aftermath of Brexit the single market plays an important role in the Irish Protocol and the defence of the Good Friday Agreement.Nevertheless, the single market must be reformed for the future, and this resolution presented a good manifesto of how to do just that. It recognises the value of public services and the need to protect and guarantee them, and says that the goals of sustainable development and a social market economy must not be subordinated to the functioning of the single market. It contains strong language on consumer protection, particularly in the digital world, and insists on the need for legislation on sustainable products and the right to repair.
Consumer protection in online video games: a European Single Market approach (A9-0300/2022 - Adriana Maldonado López)
I voted in favour of this report, which deals with potential dangers posed by online video games, particularly for children. The European video game sector, mostly made up of SMEs, is rapidly growing and had a market size of EUR 23 billion in 2020. However, legislation has not really kept up with this growth.This report highlights the potential negative sides of video games while also insisting on positive aspects such as digital culture, educational games, job creation and social connections. The report calls on the Commission to consider whether additional rules for video games are needed with the European consumer protection framework, for example rules around loot boxes. It also calls on Member States to ensure that existing legislation is properly applied to the video game sector, including GDPR and the Digital Services Act.
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy - annual report 2022 (A9-0292/2022 - David McAllister)
I abstained on this report as it recommended replacing unanimity in the Council with qualified majority voting. This scenario would deprive Ireland of its veto on sensitive matters, including foreign policy, which would also further undermine Irish neutrality. Sinn Féin is completely opposed to larger EU powers having the ability to impose their authority on Ireland, which is why we also voted in favour of amendment 35. However, I supported other aspects of the report, including the condemnation of Russia’s illegal invasion and occupation of Ukraine, and condemnation of Iran’s oppressive regime and draconian executions of protesters following the death of Mahsa Amini. I also welcomed the call for the full implementation of the Protocol with peace and stability being maintained in Ireland, as assured through the Good Friday Agreement.
Implementation of the common security and defence policy - annual report 2022 (A9-0296/2022 - Tom Vandenkendelaere)
I abstained on this report as it recommended replacing unanimity in the Council with qualified majority voting, this scenario would deprive Ireland of its veto on sensitive matters, including foreign policy, which would also further undermine Irish neutrality. In addition it sought to use Irish taxpayers’ money to fund the expansion of a military industrial complex on the continent, which is unacceptable. Sinn Féin is completely opposed to larger EU powers having the ability to impose their authority on Ireland. The position of Ireland as a military neutral state must be fundamentally protected, but aspects within these reports seek the opposite, including developing a ‘genuine European Defence Union’ transforming the EU into a de facto military alliance according to paragraphs 9, 10 and 35.
Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter - annual report 2022 (A9-0298/2022 - Isabel Wiseler-Lima)
There were a number of positive elements in this report, such as the reaffirmation of human rights, protecting the vulnerable, and condemnation of Russia’s illegal, unjustified and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine. Sinn Féin unequivocally condemns all atrocities, war crimes and serious violations of international humanitarian law, including by Israel in Palestine. However, there were recommendations in the report that would have dire consequences for Irish sovereignty and neutrality. The position of Ireland as a military neutral state must be fundamentally protected, but aspects within this report sought the opposite. In this sense, the report recommended replacing unanimity in the Council removing Ireland's veto under Paragraph 6. The report was also in favour of qualified majority voting as an alternative to unanimity under Paragraph 29. This scenario would deprive Ireland of its veto on sensitive matters, including matters relating to foreign policy, which would also further undermine Irish neutrality. Sinn Féin is completely opposed to larger EU powers having the ability to impose their authority on Ireland.
Conservation of the Southern Bluefin Tuna: conservation and management measures (A9-0134/2022 - Grace O'Sullivan)
I voted in favour of this report as it simply implements into EU law the relevant control, conservation and management measures adopted and agreed by parties to the Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna. Ireland has no involvement in southern bluefin tuna fisheries and it does not have a long-distance tuna fleet that fishes in the southern hemisphere. However, Sinn Féin calls for a bluefin tuna quota for Ireland in line with zonal attachment.
Transparency and targeting of political advertising (A9-0009/2023 - Sandro Gozi)
I voted in favour of this new legislation on political advertising, which mainly addresses online advertising. It sets new rules for transparency about the sponsors and funders of political advertisements, and requirements for online platforms and search engines to ensure that these transparency measures are respected.There are also new rules limiting the use of sensitive personal data for the targeting of political advertisements, and requiring greater transparency about the targeting algorithms used.This is a generally positive piece of legislation that will help people engage more critically with political advertisements. EU-level action is justified here, as the cross-border nature of large online platforms requires one clear set of rules.
Revision of the European Works Councils Directive (A9-0295/2022 - Dennis Radtke)
I was happy to support this excellent report.While this report mapped out a future ambitious plan for European Works Councils, I am aware that the EU Commission is investigating Ireland’s implementation of the current Directive. The government should stop prevaricating and make sure that Ireland is not a soft spot for workers’ rights and protections.
Preparation of the EU-Ukraine Summit (RC-B9-0092/2023, B9-0092/2023, B9-0093/2023, B9-0094/2023, B9-0095/2023, B9-0096/2023)
I voted in favour of this report as it is important that the EU stands in solidarity with Ukraine and support its progress towards EU membership status in line with the Copenhagen Criteria. However I was concerned with aspects of the resolution that suggests closing off diplomatic channels which could inhibit a peaceful resolution and Russian de-escalation of the war. I am also concerned about rising rhetoric in this resolution, and others to follow, that puts pressure on Ireland to send military aid, as such rhetoric and calls do not respect or acknowledge Ireland’s neutral status and policy of sending non-military and non-lethal aid. It is also important that the UN investigates allegations of war crimes, genocide and human rights violations and that Russia is held accountable for UN-confirmed cases. We also support the EU’s current list of sanctions regarding those guilty of aiding and abetting human rights violations in Ukraine and that it be enlarged if the EU and UN deems it fit.
CO2 emission standards for cars and vans (A9-0150/2022 - Jan Huitema)
I voted in favour of this updated law on the greenhouse gas emissions of cars and vans. It sets an evolving CO2 emissions limit that will require the phase-out of the production of new internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035. This is a necessary step for the decarbonisation of our transport system. Ireland is a frontrunner in this domain, with a national target of phasing out new internal combustion engine vehicles by 2030.
Amendments to the European Long-Term Investment Funds (ELTIFs) Regulation (A9-0196/2022 - Michiel Hoogeveen)
I voted against this report.The report deals with European Long-Term Investment Funds (ELTIFs) which were meant to act as a means of encouraging long-term investments in the economy. They have had little take-up though, so the Commission, as part of the Capital Markets Union agenda, has proposed loosening the rules to encourage take-up.Unfortunately the result amounts to deregulation and will add increased volatility to the financial system.
EU/North Macedonia Agreement: operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of North Macedonia (A9-0027/2023 - Lena Düpont)
I voted against this report because it is a further extension of Fortress Europe, shifting responsibility for border and migration management to third countries and further limiting access to asylum in the EU. I am particularly concerns about the reported human rights abuses on the border between Greece and North Macedonia
Authorising Poland to ratify the amendment to the Convention on the Conservation and Management of Pollock Resources in the Central Bering Sea (A9-0007/2023 - Elżbieta Rafalska)
Protocol to the EC/Korea Cooperation Agreement on a Civil Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS): accession of Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania (A9-0006/2023 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
I voted in favour of this file allowing for the accession of Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania to a pre-existing agreement. The EC/ Korea Cooperation Agreement on a Civil Global Navigation Satellite System provides for cooperation between the two parties in the use of the Galileo satellites, covering scientific research, standards, certification, joint ventures, the protection of intellectual property market development and liability. Sinn Féin did not support this agreement in 2016, given the potential use of the satellites for non-civilian purposes, e.g. law enforcement. However, as this vote was not on the content of the agreement, but merely the right of certain Member States to join an agreement in which the other Member States already participate, I treated it as a procedural measure and voted in favour.
Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe: Chips Joint Undertaking (A9-0012/2023 - Eva Maydell)
Chips or semiconductors are materials that can be adapted at an atomic level to be able to conduct electrical currents. Semiconductors are an integral part of most electronic devices and so are crucial components for many economic sectors. In February 2022, the Commission presented the Chips Act, laying out a plan to develop a strong semiconductor supply chain in the EU and reduce dependence on external semiconductor production. The Chips Act represents a large amount of public subsidies going to private companies, with limited social and environmental conditionality. One proposal under the Chips Act is the Chips Joint Undertaking (JU), adapting what was formerly the Key Digital Technologies JU to become the Chips JU. It aims to support and scale-up the development and production of advanced semiconductors in the EU. Better EU coordination on semiconductor production is warranted, as industries are hugely dependent on external supply chains. However, at its core, a JU is a Public Private Partnership where the agenda is strongly set by corporate interests, while making use of public funds. Other JUs have produced a litany of financial irregularities and undue industry influence. For this reason, I abstained on this vote.
Consultation on European Ombudsman Implementing Provisions (A9-0010/2023 - Paulo Rangel)
Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence: EU accession (A9-0021/2023 - Łukasz Kohut, Arba Kokalari)
I voted in favour of this report on the Istanbul Convention of the Council of Europe. This convention is an international treaty on combatting violence against women and domestic violence. It recognises violence against women as a human rights violation, and addresses it through measures aimed at preventing violence, protecting victims, and prosecuting the perpetrators.Among other things, the report condemns all forms of gender-based violence against women and girls and against LGBTIQ+ persons and calls on all Member States to ensure full implementation of measures stemming from the Convention in their national laws and policies.
The EU priorities for the 67th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (B9-0100/2023, B9-0103/2023)
I supported this resolution, which focused on the priories of the EP Delegation to the 67th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women, which takes place in March.Among other things, the resolution recognised that economic independence and empowerment is central to achieving gender equality. It also highlighted that gender-based violence is not limited to physical violence, but also includes gender-based cyber violence.
An EU strategy to boost industrial competitiveness, trade and quality jobs (B9-0085/2023, B9-0086/2023, B9-0087/2023, B9-0088/2023, B9-0089/2023, B9-0090/2023, B9-0091/2023, B9-0104/2023, B9-0105/2023, RC-B9-0107/2023, B9-0107/2023, B9-0108/2023, B9-0110/2023, B9-0111/2023, B9-0115/2023)
I abstained on this resolution.Quality jobs and the transition to a green industry are huge challenges. Like all big challenges, the powers of States is needed to power this change. The resolution fails to recognise this and instead sees private-only investment as the solution.I am glad the resolution was serious about the ecological transition and did not contain pro-fossil fuel ideology as some groups attempted to insert.
Following up on measures requested by Parliament to strengthen the integrity of European institutions (RC-B9-0147/2023, B9-0147/2023, B9-0150/2023, B9-0152/2023, B9-0153/2023, B9-0154/2023)
Establishment of an independent EU Ethics Body (B9-0151/2023, RC-B9-0144/2023, B9-0144/2023, B9-0145/2023, B9-0146/2023, B9-0148/2023, B9-0149/2023)
This short resolution proposed and negotiated by The Left reiterates the Parliament’s call from a 2021 report for the establishment of an Independent Ethics Body (IEB) for the EU institutions. The resolution highlights that, despite its promises and the support of the EP, the Commission is yet to make a proposal for an interinstitutional ethics body. It urges the Commission to come forward with a proposal for an IEB by March and for negotiations to be finalised by September. The EP’s Conference of Presidents is to send a letter to the Commission to this effect. In the interim, the EP’s existing sanction procedures should be strengthened and enforced. In light of the recent corruption scandals, the EU must take a harder line on ethics and transparency across its institutions. I was happy to vote in favour of this resolution.
One year of Russia’s invasion and war of aggression against Ukraine (RC-B9-0123/2023, B9-0123/2023, B9-0126/2023, B9-0131/2023, B9-0132/2023, B9-0134/2023, B9-0139/2023)
I voted in favour of this report as its important to stand in solidarity with Ukraine against Russia’s illegal invasions. However, calling for severe reparations on Russia following the war’s end will not guarantee a peaceful and democratic Russia as history has shown repeatedly, with severe reparations on Germany following WW1 causing the rise of Nazism and leading to WW2. We also support the Irish Government’s position of not sending military aid, and we criticise any erosion of Ireland’s neutrality.
Developing an EU cycling strategy (B9-0102/2023)
I voted in favour of this resolution because it promotes an environmentally friendly form of transport throughout EU Member States. This resolution looks for safer cycling infrastructure, which would unlock the full potential of cycling to really benefit the environment and cyclists. Even though this resolution looks for 2024 to be the year of cycling, I am backing 2024 to be the year of the islands. Overall, the resolution is very positive towards cycling.
Availability of fertilisers in the EU (B9-0101/2023)
I voted in favour of the resolution for which I was a shadow. The ongoing crisis concerning the rising costs of fertilisers facing farmers, who are also experiencing other rising input costs in their operations, has been detrimental to their well-being. Supports for farmers are needed, and organic fertiliser supply and collective use must be strengthened to reduce dependency on fertiliser corporations who are price-gouging farmers in Ireland. I also believe that the full involvement and consultation of local communities should be mandatory concerning the deployment of biogas and anaerobic digester facilities in Member States like Ireland.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified oilseed rape MON 94100 (MON-941ØØ-2) (B9-0162/2023)
I voted in favour of this objection to the Commission’s continued approval of GMO products without a robust and proper scientific assessment of their real world impact. It is the view of the majority of Member States and MEPs that the precautionary principle requires a new approval process that really takes into account the risks associated with GMO crops. Yet the Commission continues to authorise them – a move that even the Commission has called undemocratic.
Ro-ro passenger ships: stability requirements (A9-0255/2022 - Roberts Zīle)
I voted in favour of this technical proposal, which updates an existing EU Directive (2003/25/EC) which sets damage stability requirements for ferries (roll-on roll-off passenger ships). The aim of the proposal is to improve maritime safety. There is a need to update EU law to take into account global developments in this area at the IMO, particularly the 2020 amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS Convention).
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States (Effort Sharing Regulation) (A9-0163/2022 - Jessica Polfjärd)
I voted in favour of this revision of the Effort Sharing Regulation, which sets targets for emission reductions in sectors not covered by the EU ETS (road transport, buildings, agriculture waste). This revision updates the EU—wide target to bring it in line with the new 2030 climate targets, and sets national targets towards achieving the overall goal. The trilogue agreement has shortcomings but is an improvement on the Commission’s proposal. I support the maintenance of a strong Effort Sharing Regulation that gives Member States clear ownership of climate action, rather than relying increasingly on market mechanisms.
Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) (A9-0161/2022 - Ville Niinistö)
I voted in favour of this revision of the LULUCF Regulation. The LULUCF Regulation governs the EU’s approach to emission reduction and carbon removal from land and forests. The EU’s carbon sink is currently declining; this revision sets targets to reverse that trend. It is up to Member States to decide how they achieve those targets in a way that is compatible with their different natural landscapes.
Revision of the Market Stability Reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (A9-0045/2022 - Cyrus Engerer)
I voted in favour of this technical revision of the market stability reserve, which is part of the EU ETS. If this revision is not implemented, the level of climate ambition generated by the ETS will decrease. While there are many criticisms to be made of the EU ETS, this technical change makes sense from an environmental protection standpoint.
Energy performance of buildings (recast) (A9-0033/2023 - Ciarán Cuffe)
I was happy to vote in favour of this progressive position on the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. As the EU’s building stock accounts for up to 40% of energy consumption, an ambitious renovation strategy is crucial for achieving the 2030 and 2050 climate targets. On top of that, building renovations can help lift people out of energy poverty and improve their physical and mental health by improving the state of their homes. Parliament’s position contained many positive points on renovation schemes that benefit low-income households and an emphasis on district-level approaches to sustainable housing, with strong roles for local councils.
Data Act (A9-0031/2023 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)
The Data Act deals with non-personal data that is generated by a product during its use, i.e. data generated through our use of devices (smart appliances, smart car systems, internet of things). While the Commission’s proposal is an interesting one to create more open data that is not held by just a few giant corporations, Parliament’s position was a step back from the original proposal in several respects. It strengthens protections around trade secrets for big corporations and places barriers to public authorities accessing data which they could use to provide better public services. For this reason, I abstained on the final text.
Policy Coherence for Development (A9-0019/2023 - Janina Ochojska)
I supported this own initiative report on policy coherence for development (PCD). Among other things, the report calls for a high-level EU strategy for the implementation of the UN’s 2030 Agenda and the SDGs, which should be ambitious, integrated and grounded in human rights frameworks and should respect inter-generational equity.
EU/United States Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV (A9-0042/2023 - Bernd Lange)
Law enforcement information exchange (A9-0247/2022 - Lena Düpont)
I voted in favour of this as it is an Update to an existing Directive on the mandatory and pro-active exchange of information by police authorities. While there are some limitations to the information exchanged, this instrument foresee a limitation of exchange of information to what would be strictly necessary to investigate a given criminal case.
The further repressions against the people of Belarus, in particular the cases of Andrzej Poczobut and Ales Bialiatski (B9-0163/2023, RC-B9-0164/2023, B9-0164/2023, B9-0165/2023, B9-0166/2023, B9-0167/2023, B9-0168/2023)
I voted in favour of this report. It is important to stand with Ukraine against hostility by the Belarusian authorities. The actions of the Belarusian Government is also unjustified in its repression of opposition activists and targeting of human rights defenders and journalists. However, I disagree with the condemnation of the International Olympic Committee and its decision to allow members of the Belarussian population compete under a neutral flag.
The functioning of the EEAS and a stronger EU in the world (A9-0045/2023 - Urmas Paet)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Employment and social priorities for 2023 (A9-0051/2023 - Estrella Durá Ferrandis)
Implementation report on the Agreement on the withdrawal of the UK from the EU (A9-0052/2023 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
EU-Armenia relations (A9-0036/2023 - Andrey Kovatchev)
The EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders (A9-0034/2023 - Hannah Neumann)
I voted in favour of this report, as it seeks better protections, safeguards for human rights defenders and civil society organisations, including in third countries where they are under threat. I also support integrating them more efficiently in decision-making bodies and committees.However, Sinn Féin does not support any suggestions, no matter how implicit, that may recommend qualified majority voting in areas that traditionally require unanimity in the Council. Unanimity is extremely important in protecting the interests of smaller states like Ireland against larger states, such as on issues like neutrality, and so Ireland’s veto must be maintained.
Joint Investigation Teams collaboration platform (A9-0245/2022 - Malik Azmani)
General Product Safety Regulation (A9-0191/2022 - Dita Charanzová)
Strengthening the application of the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women (A9-0056/2022 - Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Samira Rafaela)
I voted in favour of this proposal as the aim is to narrow the gender pay gap through the method of assigning pay transparency obligations to employers, reinforcing workers’ access to pay information, and better protections for victims of pay discrimination.The proposal focuses on two core elements of equal pay: measures to ensure pay transparency for workers as well as better access to justice for victims of pay discrimination.This directive will offer a series of new rights to all European workers, notably on access to information and justice, and will allow for the implementation of plans to reduce the gender pay gap within the largest workplaces. Overall, the passing of this proposal in the parliament is a win for all those who are facing discrimination in the workplace and a step in the right direction to tackling inequalities in wages.
Fluorinated Gases Regulation (A9-0048/2023 - Bas Eickhout)
I voted in favour of this technical file that proposes controls on fluorinated gases which are powerful greenhouse gases. These gases have a powerful and dangerous global warming effect up to 25 000 times greater than CO2. The proposal includes some technical consideration to control these gases such as prevention of emissions, leakage checks and detection, license to import, export and as a condition to trade, and brings in reporting obligations for producers and those involved in the supply chain. It also recommends the establishment of a consultation forum to advise and provide expert knowledge to the Commission in the implementation of the regulation, represented by Member States and representatives of civil society, including environmental organisations, representatives of manufacturers, operators and certified persons. In this context, it is important to support a just transition for society and stakeholders.
Ozone-depleting substances (A9-0050/2023 - Jessica Polfjärd)
I voted in favour of this file as it targets products in which ozone depleting substances (ODS) were legally used in the past. The aim is to prevent the equivalent of 180 million tonnes of CO2 and 32 000 tonnes of ozone depleting potential (ODP) emissions by 2050. It is important to support more controls given that emissions from ozone-depleting substances (ODS) have resulted both in the formation of the ‘hole’ in the ozone layer as well as contributing to global warming and serious human health issues. Controlling these emissions is key to preventing health effects resulting from a damaged ozone layer and to reach climate targets in line with a just transition for society and stakeholders.
2022 Rule of Law Report - The rule of law situation in the European Union (B9-0189/2023, B9-0190/2023, B9-0191/2023)
I voted in favour this resolution. It is important that the values of human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, rule of law and respect for human rights and minorities, are safeguarded across the EU. Some Member States like Poland and Hungary have regressed on a number of aspects, such as political interference in the independence of the judiciary, the freedom of the press, intentional targeting and vilification of minorities, in addition to the legal repression of women and access to abortion. In this context, the resolution called for the Commission to expand the scope of is reporting of the rule of law to cover all the values of Article 2 of the TEU. It also deplored the fact that the Commission did not address in full the proposals made by the Parliament in previous resolutions and stressed the need to cover democracy and fundamental rights, as fundamental rights violations happening in the Member States deserve recommendations. I did not support a number of amendments tabled by the Polish right and others calling for respect for sovereignty and the constitutional order as it was a cynical attempt to deflect from their governing party’s poor current track record on women’s rights and interference with the independence of the judiciary.
Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System (A9-0162/2022 - Peter Liese)
I abstained on the final vote on the EU ETS regulation. The changes made to the existing ETS, which covers electricity generation, industry and aviation, were positive from a climate action standpoint, and will help to reach the EU’s 2030 climate goals. While I do not believe that market-based instruments are the best basis for EU climate policy, the reality is that the ETS is the main emissions reduction tool for these sectors, and this revision provides for definite improvements in the existing ETS. However, it also proposes a new ETS to cover emissions from fuels used in buildings and road transport. This means that a charge very similar to Ireland’s carbon tax will be applied to all households in the EU. However, households are not like businesses and cannot change their energy consumption quickly as carbon prices rise. This is a regressive measure that will have the greatest impact on low-income households. I believe that it is a mistake to subject these sectors to a market mechanism and for this reason I could not vote in favour of the EU ETS revision. I abstained to indicate support for the improved climate ambition in the existing ETS sectors.
Monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport (A9-0134/2023 - Peter Liese)
I voted in favour of this file, which is a technical adaptation of existing legislation to allow for the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport under the EU ETS. The inclusion of maritime emissions (from cargo transport and large passenger ships) makes sense from a climate action standpoint, as these emissions have been largely unregulated to date.
Carbon border adjustment mechanism (A9-0160/2022 - Mohammed Chahim)
I voted in favour of this new law setting up a carbon border adjustment mechanism. This will apply to the imports of emissions-intensive raw materials like steel, hydrogen and cement, which are not subject to a carbon price in the country where they are produced. This will remove the risk of carbon leakage and allow for the phase-out of free allocation under the EU ETS. Free allocation is the process whereby most European industrial emitters get the majority of their carbon allowances for free, for fear of carbon leakage. Free allocation is a major disincentive to decarbonisation and the CBAM will allow us to move away from this counterproductive measure.
Social Climate Fund (A9-0157/2022 - David Casa, Esther de Lange)
I was happy to support this new EU fund, which is dedicated to supporting vulnerable households in the green transition. This is the first time that major EU legislation has recognised that low-income households need to be protected from the mid-term financial costs of climate action, and given the means to benefit from renewable energy and energy efficiency measures. Ireland will receive EUR 663 million from the fund over 6 years, with an additional 25 % coming from the national budget. This fund provides Ireland with a big opportunity to take on and eliminate energy poverty.
Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System for aviation (A9-0155/2022 - Sunčana Glavak)
I voted in favour of this revision, which improved the climate ambition of the existing EU ETS for aviation. The inclusion of provisions around non-CO2 emissions is an important step forward in EU legislation, as these emissions can account for up to 50 % of the sector’s greenhouse gas impact. The EU could act as a global leader in addressing non-CO2 emissions from aviation.
Sustainable carbon cycles (A9-0066/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber)
I voted against this report. At the outset, the report was a rather vague compromise between different political groups, and as a result it did not say much that was new or concrete on the issue of carbon sequestration and removals. During the votes on amendments, a number of amendments were passed that significantly weakened the text, introducing provisions that would lead to the double-counting of emissions and removals. The measurement of carbon removals is a difficult and inexact science, and every precaution must be made to ensure that when we account for carbon removals, that this accurately reflects the removal of a certain amount of CO2 from the atmosphere. Farmers should be financially supported to take steps that help them reduce their on-farm emissions, such as the generation of solar energy, but these measures should not be mixed in and conflated with carbon removals.
eGovernment accelerating digital public services that support the functioning of the single market (A9-0065/2023 - Tomislav Sokol)
The implementation of civilian CSDP and other EU civilian security assistance (A9-0091/2023 - Alviina Alametsä)
I voted against the report as it called for the modification of decision-making procedures, including examining a shift towards qualified majority voting, which would remove Ireland’s veto. It also calls for a substantive increase in the CFSP budget during a time when people and families are dealing with a cost-of-living crisis.
Deforestation Regulation (A9-0219/2022 - Christophe Hansen)
I was happy to support this important new law, which aims to reduce the EU’s impact on deforestation around the world. Companies which import certain raw materials to the EU, including cattle, cocoa, palm oil, coffee and wood, must ensure that these products have not been produced on land that has been deforested. This will be done using satellite data to link products to the land where they were produced. Member States will perform random checks on companies to ensure that they are complying with the regulation. Where they are found to be in violation of the new rules, they can face fines and be denied access to the EU’s market. As the EU is responsible for driving up to 16% of global deforestation, this new law is hugely important for protecting the world’s forests and biodiversity.
Methods and procedure for making available own resources based on the Emissions Trading System, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and reallocated profits and on the measures to meet cash requirements (A9-0046/2023 - José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer)
Challenges facing the Republic of Moldova (B9-0197/2023, RC-B9-0198/2023, B9-0198/2023, B9-0199/2023, B9-0200/2023, B9-0203/2023, B9-0204/2023)
I voted in favour of this report as Moldova is in a precarious situation due to the combination of the war in Ukraine, national impoverishment, soaring costs, socio-economic pressures due to the influx of refugees fleeing the war, and alleged attempts by certain internal and external actors to destabilise Moldova.
Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa) (A9-0052/2022 - Stefan Berger)
I was happy to support this trilogue outcome.My support for these rules is based on the fact that this legislation brings transparency, protects consumers and aids financial stability. I have zero interest in creating a market or in fostering the use of crypto-assets as the Commission has stated it wishes to do.These rules must be implemented without any backsliding on the deadlines which means most of the rules must be in place within 18 months.
Universal decriminalization of homosexuality, in light of recent developments in Uganda (RC-B9-0219/2023, B9-0219/2023, B9-0220/2023, B9-0221/2023, B9-0222/2023, B9-0223/2023, B9-0224/2023)
I was happy to support this resolution. The resolution comes in the wake of Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill, which criminalises homosexuality and makes it punishable by the death penalty in certain circumstances. The resolution strongly condemns this new law and calls for a strong EU response. The resolution also calls for the universal decriminalisation of homosexuality and transgender identity and the abolition of the death penalty, and for an EU strategy to promote the decriminalisation of homosexuality, making it a key condition of trade agreements and international partnerships.
Specific rules relating to medicinal products for human use intended to be placed on the market of Northern Ireland (A9-0167/2023 - Pascal Canfin)
Specific rules relating to the entry into Northern Ireland from other parts of the United Kingdom of certain consignments of retail goods, plants for planting, seed potatoes, machinery and certain vehicles operated for agricultural or forestry purposes, as well as non-commercial movements of certain pet animals into Northern Ireland (A9-0168/2023 - Pascal Canfin, Martin Hlaváček)
EU/Euratom/Ukraine Association Agreement: temporary trade liberalisation supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products (A9-0165/2023 - Sandra Kalniete)
. – I voted in favour. This measure is due to the significant increase over the last year in imports into the EU of Ukrainian agricultural products, an increase that has led neighbouring countries like Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and Bulgaria to unilaterally introduce import bans on some products from Ukraine. Romania signed a letter jointly with those countries to the Commission. In addition to the safeguard mechanism introduced in the regulation, additional compensatory financial support has been proposed for the impacted farmers.
EU/Brazil Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom`s withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0171/2023 - Jordi Cañas)
Methane emissions reduction in the energy sector (A9-0162/2023 - Pascal Canfin, Jutta Paulus)
I voted in favour of the Parliament’s position on the methane regulation, which contains many improvements on the Commission’s proposal for managing methane emissions from the energy sector. Importantly, the Parliament’s position requires the petrochemical sector and importers of fossil fuels to meet the requirements for monitoring and repairing methane leakage.
Accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications (A9-0157/2023 - Marion Walsmann)
New EU Urban Mobility Framework (A9-0108/2023 - Andrey Novakov)
I voted in favour of this report, as it: stresses the need to address the problems of transport poverty and inequalities in access to transport networks; proposes that revenues from mobility related carbon taxes should be used to fund sustainable transport solutions for the transport poor; encourages the Commission to establish a harmonised yearly ‘EU car—free day’; calls for better accessibility, reliability and connectivity between urban, peri—urban and rural areas; and stresses the importance of trains for travelling to and from urban areas.
Critical technologies for security and defence (A9-0120/2023 - Riho Terras)
I voted against this report which calls for greater EU coordination and financial support for the development of the defence industry in Europe. The report contains repeated calls for increased state spending on defence and security, and for EU spending on defence to be increased as well. I find this trend towards militarisation in the EU very worrying, moving away from the peace project at its origins and putting neutral states like Ireland in a very challenging position.
Implementation of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (A9-0139/2023 - Petra Kammerevert)
Schools scheme for fruit, vegetables, milk and dairy products (A9-0096/2023 - Carmen Avram)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution as it calls for more funds for the EU school scheme for fruit, vegetables and milk and for the distribution of unprocessed, organic and local products. It also urges for less bureaucracy, longer contracts for schools and easier procurement procedures as well as for Member States to invest at least 10 % of their yearly budget allocated to the school scheme in nutrition education.
Standardisation strategy for the single market (A9-0136/2023 - Adam Bielan)
I abstained on this report as the standardisation system in the EU is very market-driven, and this report insisted that it remain so, rather than considering a greater role for standards and requirements adopted by the legislature. In addition, I disagree with this report’s call for greater EU-NATO cooperation on standards in the defence industry.
2022 Report on Serbia (A9-0172/2023 - Vladimír Bilčík)
. – I voted in favour of this report as it calls for Serbian compliance with regards to obligations on human rights, fighting corruption, media freedom, strengthening the rule of law, electoral reforms, concerns around media capture and biased reporting promoting the lines of the authorities, particularly in the targeting of politicians and the investigation of notable scandals that have occurred in Serbia. It also calls for a political solution with Kosovo, supports de-escalating tensions and furthering the normalisation of relations between Serbia and Kosovo.
2022 Report on Kosovo (A9-0174/2023 - Viola von Cramon-Taubadel)
. – The report contains all the necessary language on the need for Kosovo to comply with human rights, fight corruption, media freedom, strengthen the rule of law, and promote democratic electoral reforms. However , I do not agree with the rapporteur calling for the EU to adopt a position in favour of all EU countries recognising Kosovo. Currently Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Slovakia and Spain do not recognise Kosovo. Foreign affairs is a Member State competence. We want a peaceful solution and favour normalisation of relations between the EU, Serbia and Kosovo. I also supported the positive wording on minority rights or the need to ensure climate targets, fight against gender based-violence, and on the rights of minorities and LGBTI people.
Impact on the 2024 EU budget of increasing European Union Recovery Instrument borrowing costs (A9-0163/2023 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
The EURI was set up to let the EU borrow to fund the RRF. Now with interest rate raising the BUDG committee is warning that this will cost more than expected.The report’s solution is to seek additional Own Resources and the re-opening of the MFF. It is a complex issue but this is simply a federalist response that I do not support.
Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence – EU accession: institutions and public administration of the Union (A9-0169/2023 - Łukasz Kohut, Arba Kokalari)
Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence - EU accession: judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement (A9-0170/2023 - Łukasz Kohut, Arba Kokalari)
Own resources: a new start for EU finances, a new start for Europe (A9-0155/2023 - José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer)
I opposed this report as it not only supports the implementation of new Own Resources as mapped out but still subject to political considerations but goes even further and propose further additional Own Resources.While some proposals for Own Resources may be progressive in nature the idea of further EU level tax-raising powers is not one I agree with.
Empowering consumers for the green transition (A9-0099/2023 - Biljana Borzan)
I voted in favour of this report, containing amendments to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and Consumer Rights Directive to improve consumer rights around sustainability. This is done by setting stricter rules about environmental claims which companies can make about their products, and requirements for better reparability of goods. The report made many good additions to the Commission’s original proposal that will help consumers be more confident in their sustainable shopping choices, and reduce overconsumption.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112 (2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton 281-24-236 x 3006-210-23 (B9-0232/2023)
I voted in favour of this objection. There is a recurrent problem whereby the Commission uses Implementing Decisions to re-authorise GMO products without adequate scientific oversight and without securing the support of a majority of Member States. The Commission has acknowledged a problem of democratic deficit with this process, yet continues to re-authorise products in this way. For this GMO cotton variety, the EFSA did not assess the real-world impacts of its use, which leads to increased spraying of the herbicides and insecticides to which it is resistant. This has negative impacts on the health of farmers and potentially of consumers. Better scientific scrutiny is needed.
Roadmap on a Social Europe: two years after Porto (B9-0235/2023, B9-0236/2023)
Adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (B9-0234/2023)
. – I voted in favour of the resolution as it criticises the draft adequacy decision under GDPR for the US (the Data Privacy Framework, DPF). Some improvements have been made compared to previous proposed adequacy decisions, there are a number of remaining shortcomings, in particular with regard to mass-surveillance activities (including of EU citizens) by US intelligence services. This leads to the conclusion that this draft adequacy decision would not stand before the Court of Justice of the European Union, culminating in the call in the Commission not to adopt the decision unless at least certain improvements have been made.
Towards a strong and sustainable EU algae sector (B9-0233/2023)
Act in Support of Ammunition Production (C9-0161/2023)
I abstained on this file as it is Ireland’s position that the focus should be on sending non-lethal aid only, a position that Sinn Féin shares. This policy aligns with Irish neutrality. I do recognise, and it is the position of Sinn Féin, that Ukraine must be assisted in the face of Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. There were, however, some very concerning parts of this regulation that I do not support, particularly the new planning and permit-granting process that would give priority over the construction of munitions factories that would override public health and environmental legislation and safeguards, the deepening militarisation of the EU, and a derogation from the Working Time Directive that would be detrimental for workers.
Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (A9-0173/2023 - Paolo De Castro)
I voted in favour of this file as it strengthens the role of producer groups, adds more robust protection of GIs, and adds the need for sustainability undertakings. On the amendment regarding the addition to the annexes of cigar products I abstained, whilst I recognise that in some Member States tobacco is domestically important and produced locally, I would however be concerned about multinational tobacco companies exploiting such an addition to the annex which would be detrimental to public health and undermine the principles of this regulation.
Arrangements between the European Parliament and the ECB on structuring their interaction practices in the area of central banking (A9-0158/2023 - Salvatore De Meo)
EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles (A9-0176/2023 - Delara Burkhardt)
Global textile production is growing rapidly, alongside unsustainable clothing consumption patterns driven by fast fashion. The clothing sector is a major polluter, consumer of water and source of waste. The sector is also beset by poor working conditions and exploitation, against a mostly female workforce. I voted in favour of this own initiative report, which calls for a common EU approach to making textiles and clothing more sustainable, not only in terms of environmental impact, but also in terms of the labour rights of those making our clothes. The report advocates binding EU requirements for sustainable textiles, through laws such as the Ecodesign Directive, the REACH Regulation and the Waste Framework Directive. It calls for the EU to promote the ratification of ILO conventions by third countries and to mainstream a gender perspective into its strategy for sustainable and circular textiles.
Breaches of the Rule of law and fundamental rights in Hungary and frozen EU funds (B9-0257/2023)
Sexual harassment in the EU and MeToo evaluation (A9-0178/2023 - Michal Šimečka)
I supported this own initiative report evaluating the Me Too movement. The report took a critical look at Member States’ and EU Institutions’ efforts to tackle harassment. Among other things, the report condemned all forms of harassment, especially sexual harassment and stated that gender-based violence is both a cause and a consequence of gender inequality.
Foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation (A9-0187/2023 - Sandra Kalniete)
I abstained on this non-legislative report on the basis that it linked pro-independence movements, such as the movement in Catalonia, to Russia. This in itself is disinformation, and as a representative that believes in the right to self-determination, I could not stand over such obvious attempts to undermine the legitimate and democratic rights of people to determine their own futures. I agree we need to take action to tackle foreign interference and disinformation in our democratic processes, but this report’s attempt to link pro-independence movements, such as those in Catalonia, to Russia is a transparent tactic to undermine peaceful and democratic efforts towards independence.
Coordinated action to address antimicrobial resistance (B9-0258/2023)
I voted in favour of this resolution, which provided suggestions to Member States for tackling anti-microbial resistance. Anti-microbial resistance is already a significant health problem, which will become significantly worse if measures are not taken to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, improve infection prevention measures, and support research into new antibiotics and alternative therapies. The resolution also advocated that Member States take a One Health approach to anti-microbial resistance, meaning that they take a holistic approach to protect the health of people, animals and the environment. The One Health approach is becoming increasingly important given the risk of zoonotic diseases and high pressure on ecosystems.
Draft amending budget No 1/2023: Technical adjustments stemming from the political agreements reached on several legislative proposals, including with respect to REPowerEU, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the Union Secure Connectivity programme (A9-0209/2023 - Fabienne Keller)
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure concerning the referral of proposals for legally binding acts to committees and the procedure for solving conflicts of competence (A9-0198/2023 - Gabriele Bischoff)
Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: legal representatives directive (A9-0257/2020 - Birgit Sippel)
Electronic evidence regulation: European production and preservation orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters (A9-0256/2020 - Birgit Sippel)
European Union Drugs Agency (A9-0289/2022 - Isabel Santos)
. – I voted in favour of this report this legislative proposal which will expand the role of the EU Drugs Agency into a full EU agency to ensure that the agency is prepared to meet future challenges of the drug phenomenon. Specifically, the revision of the mandate seeks to strengthen the agency’s capacity to monitor poly-substance use, build its threat assessment capabilities and reinforce the position of national focal points.
Competition policy - annual report 2022 (A9-0183/2023 - René Repasi)
Implementation of the Regulations on the European citizens' initiative (A9-0182/2023 - Loránt Vincze)
EU/Thailand Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (A9-0193/2023 - Andrey Kovatchev)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution as it calls on the Thai Government to respect the role of civil society, journalists and others to ensure freedom of expression and assembly. Additionally the resolution encourages the EU and Thailand to step up efforts to tackle the effects of climate change by adopting and implementing more effective climate policies towards energy transition and decarbonisation, commit to sustainable fishing in the Indo-Pacific and strengthen EU cooperation with Thailand to combat overfishing. I also strongly welcome the resolution’s call for human rights issues to be considered during any negotiations with Thailand.
EU/Malaysia Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (A9-0190/2023 - Gheorghe-Vlad Nistor)
. – I voted in favour as the text seeks to enhance political dialogue on issues of global concern and give more scope for mutually beneficial cooperation in a wide number of policy areas, including on the environment, climate change, employment and social affairs, human rights and non-proliferation.
EU/Malaysia Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (A9-0194/2023 - Gheorghe-Vlad Nistor)
. – I voted in favour of the resolution as it seeks to enhance political dialogue on issues of global concern and give more scope for mutually beneficial cooperation in a wide number of policy areas, including on the environment, climate change, employment and social affairs, human rights and non-proliferation. I also welcome the calls in the text for the Malaysian authorities to repeal the discriminatory nationality and citizenship laws that undermine women’s basic human rights, promote more corporate accountability, enhance cooperation to address climate change, promote freedom of expression and assembly, and the protection of human rights. I also support the resolution’s condemnation of the widespread discrimination against the LGBTIQ+ community.
EU/Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement: implementing the Agreement (2022-2026). Protocol (A9-0196/2023 - François-Xavier Bellamy)
Artificial Intelligence Act (A9-0188/2023 - Brando Benifei, Dragoş Tudorache)
. – I abstained in the European Parliament’s vote on the AI Act. I support the general thrust of this new regulation and the Commission’s proposal to impose requirements for transparency, data governance and human oversight on high-risk AI applications.However, the position adopted by Parliament included a major loophole, which compromised the original proposal made by the Commission. Parliament’s position adds extra conditions that need to be met for an AI system dealing with public infrastructure, education, employment or public services to be considered ‘high risk’ and therefore subject to stricter regulatory requirements. This essentially creates an additional barrier to protections for citizens.For this reason, I abstained on the final vote, as I believe that the Commission’s proposal provides better protection for citizens’ fundamental rights than Parliament’s position. I support the ban on real-time biometric identification in public spaces, as introduced in Parliament’s position.
Batteries and waste batteries (A9-0031/2022 - Achille Variati)
. – I voted in favour of this new regulation, which is part of the Circular Economy Action Plan. It aims to better include circularity, sustainability concerns and the latest technological developments in the use and disposal of batteries within the EU.It establishes mandatory requirements for all batteries placed on the EU market, relating to sustainability, hazardous substances, carbon footprint, mandatory recycled content targets, durability and replaceability. It contains due diligence requirements for economic operators to address the ecological and social risks associated with the supply chains of batteries. It sets collection targets for waste batteries and for the recovery of materials like lithium and cadmium from used batteries. These measures will help address the problems associated with the supply chains of batteries and facilitate their use in the energy transition.
Ensuring food security and the long-term resilience of EU agriculture (A9-0185/2023 - Marlene Mortler)
. – I voted in favour of this report as it recommends temporary measures to support EU farmers, which should be maintained if the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues, support for family farms who in Ireland face high costs and other challenges, ensures farmers receive better pay while enabling the agricultural sector to play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, deplores and seeks to prevent land grabbing, supports and encourages women to enter the sector, and calls for a strategy to promote generational renewal.
Investigation of the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware (Recommendation) (B9-0664/2022, B9-0260/2023)
. – I supported this resolution on the Special Committee on PEGA, which was set up on March 2022. Among other things, the committee was mandated to investigate the scope of alleged contraventions, or maladministration in the implementation, of Union law regarding the use of the Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware. The alleged breaches took place in Poland, Hungary, Greece, Spain and Cyprus.
EU Day for the victims of the global climate crisis (B9-0296/2023)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution, which calls for the EU to observe an EU day for victims of the global climate crisis every year on 15 July. The aim of the day is to commemorate victims, to raise awareness about the impacts of climate change, and to support those providing assistance in disasters. It is appropriate to commemorate and honour victims, but MEPs must not forget that their real role in the climate crisis is to legislate for ambitious climate action, and to insist on adequate climate financing to support climate mitigation and adaptation in the Global South.
Ukraine’s accession to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (B9-0267/2023)
. – I voted in favour to give consent to the EU and the Council position to ratify Ukraine‘s accession to this convention. The convention provides a minimum standard for the circulation of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters among the countries that are party to the convention. It mostly relates to cross-border transactions and clarity as to whether and to what extent a judgment will be recognised and enforced in another jurisdiction.
Sustainable reconstruction and integration of Ukraine into the Euro-Atlantic community (RC-B9-0270/2023, B9-0270/2023, B9-0274/2023, B9-0275/2023, B9-0277/2023, B9-0278/2023, B9-0281/2023)
. – I voted in favour of this resolution as Sinn Féin strongly supports Ukraine in its resistance against Russia’s illegal invasion, and Ukraine’s sustainable reconstruction. I welcome the resolution’s calls for increased support and assistance to Ukraine on its path to EU accession, and that Ukraine respect its obligations for EU accession in the areas of anti-corruption, judicial reform, the rule of law and human rights, as these are vital criteria for accession – criteria that should be respected without exception. I did not support the ECR’s amendments, as they brought no real added value to the agreed text.
Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals (A9-0213/2023 - Udo Bullmann, Petros Kokkalis)
. – I voted in favour of this report, which assesses the state of implementation of the SDGs in advance of the High Level Political Forum on the SDGs.Implementation of the SDGs is far off track for the 2030 goals, and this was exacerbated by the pandemic. The report highlights this and calls for greater leadership and action from the EU. It highlights that the EU not only has responsibility for meeting its own goals, but also for reducing its spill-over effect that impedes the delivery of the SDGs in other countries.As it stands, the SDGs are not well-integrated into policy-making at EU level or within Member States. I support the calls in this report for a Commissioner responsible for the SDGs, concrete measures for achieving the EU’s goals and a financial plan to accompany these measures.We also need greater policy coherence for development in the EU’s trade policies and within the EU budget, and for new EU laws to be screened for their impact on the SDGs in other countries. The global financial system must better cater to achieving the SDGs, including through debt relief.
Temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Moldovan products under the EU/Euratom/Moldova Association Agreement (A9-0219/2023 - Markéta Gregorová)
I voted in favour of this report. The proposal would renew the current suspension of import duties on Moldovan exports to the EU for another year and extend this suspension to all remaining tariffs and tariff rate quotas on Moldovan imports under the EU-Moldova Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade agreement.This means in practice that exports of seven agricultural products from Moldova that are subject to tariff-rate quotas will now be fully liberalised: tomatoes, garlic, table grapes, apples, cherries, plums and grape juice. Moldova’s exports to the rest of the world have suffered from the war in Ukraine because they often relied on transit through Ukrainian territory and Ukrainian infrastructure.
New Regulation on Construction Products (A9-0207/2023 - Christian Doleschal)
I voted against the Parliament’s position on the Construction Products Regulation, as it was a significant step down from what the Commission had originally proposed. The Construction Products Regulation is an existing regulation that sets a framework for setting EU-wide standards for construction products. The main aim of the current revision was to also include environmental aspects in these EU-wide standards for construction products. The Parliament’s position waters down most of the sustainability aspects. It also gives the CPR precedence over other legislation on product safety and environmental performance. It does nothing to address the climate impact of building materials.
EU/Japan Agreement: air services (A9-0221/2023 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
I voted in favour. The Commission has negotiated an agreement with Japan to replace certain provisions in the already existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Japan in order to bring the bilateral air services agreements in line with EU law, as requested by the Court of Justice in the so-called ‘Open Skies’ cases of 2002.On this basis, the Agreement will bring the bilateral air services agreements between 13 Member States and Japan in line with the EU law, also allowing any EU carrier to fly from any Member State that has a bilateral agreement with Japan where unused traffic rights are available.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112 (4): The food additives nitrites (E 249-250) and nitrates (E 251-252) (B9-0307/2023)
I voted in favour of this objection, as I believe that the EU should have more stringent restrictions on the use of nitrites and nitrates as food additives. Nitrates and nitrites are added to a lot of hams, sausages and cured meats to preserve them. However, for decades, there have been concerns about the cancer risk associated with nitrates and nitrites as food additives, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified them as carcinogenic.The Commission has proposed to reduce the maximum amounts of nitrites and nitrates allowed on food products. The Parliament tabled this objection on the grounds that they should be banned entirely as food additives, now that there are several nitrate-free alternatives to meat preservation.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111 (3): Detailed production rules for organic sea salt and other organic salts for food and feed (B9-0308/2023)
Industrial Emissions Directive (A9-0216/2023 - Radan Kanev)
I voted in favour of this file. The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) is an existing piece of EU legislation that seeks to control air and water pollution from agriculture and industrial activities by means of a permit-granting procedure. The IED is currently being revised under the European Green Deal. I support the increased requirements for industrial polluters within the revision. For the inclusion of certain medium-sized farms under the scope of the Directive, I would support the thresholds of the Council’s general approach, which strike a balance between covering a large proportion of agricultural emissions without placing an undue burden on medium-sized pig and poultry farms.
Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (A9-0234/2022 - Petar Vitanov)
I supported this proposal, which makes of part of the Fit for 55 target and aims to put forward a wide range of legislative and regulatory measures to align the EU with its long-term climate goals and the objectives of the Paris Agreement. From a TRAN perspective, the package focuses on Sustainable Mobility: The package includes measures to promote cleaner and more sustainable transportation, including the revision of CO2 standards for vehicles and the promotion of electric vehicles.
Sustainable maritime fuels (FuelEU Maritime Initiative) (A9-0233/2022 - Jörgen Warborn)
I voted in favour of this is report on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport (FuelEU Maritime). It is part of the Fit for 55 package. The proposal by the Commission establishes a common EU framework to increase the development, production and use of low-carbon fuels in shipping.
Energy efficiency (recast) (A9-0221/2022 - Niels Fuglsang)
I voted in favour of the outcome of interinstitutional negotiations on the Energy Efficiency Directive. The greenest, most affordable energy is that which we do not use, and for this reason improving energy efficiency is a key pillar of the European Green Deal. The final agreement on this law was not as ambitious as the Commission’s proposal or the Parliament’s position. However, given the importance of energy efficiency and the need to set targets at EU level, I voted in favour.I note with interest the article addressing data centres and acknowledging the problems they pose for energy efficiency - this is a challenge that Ireland is facing as data centres will eat up the bulk of our new energy supply in the coming years.
Protection of journalists and human rights defenders from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings (A9-0223/2023 - Tiemo Wölken)
Management, conservation and control measures in the area covered under the Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA) (A9-0192/2023 - João Pimenta Lopes)
European Chips Act (A9-0014/2023 - Dan Nica)
I abstained on the outcome of interinstitutional negotiations on the Chips Act. Semiconductors are used in electronic components of a wide variety of devices, from computers to solar panels to medical equipment. They are an integral part of most electronic devices and so are crucial components for many economic sectors. I agree with the general aim of the EU to develop the European semiconductor sector to improve supply and create new job opportunities. However, the approach proposed in the Chips Act would give huge subsidies to private companies without adequate social or environmental conditions attached. It also considers semiconductor foundries to be of overriding public interest, which would justify their construction in protected areas.
Banking Union – annual report 2022 (A9-0177/2023 - Kira Marie Peter-Hansen)
I voted against this report mainly because it gives support the EU position of not implementing Basel III rules in a timely and full manner. Fifteen years after the banking crash, the EU runs the risk of falling back into a mode of deregulation.I do welcome the full support for a European Deposit Insurance Scheme, which should be finalised as soon as possible.
Fostering and adapting vocational training as a tool for employees' success and a building block for the EU economy in the new industry 4.0 (A9-0232/2023 - Anna Zalewska)
Ecodesign Regulation (A9-0218/2023 - Alessandra Moretti)
I voted in favour of this proposal, which aims to expand the existing Ecodesign Directive into a broader regulation. The Ecodesign Directive sets out environmental and energy efficiency requirements for energy appliances. The expanded Ecodesign Regulation would cover a much wider range of products. The legislative text does not set requirements for individual products, but sets a framework for the kind of environmental requirements needed for each product. The Commission then works with expert groups to prepare technical documents, giving the detail of how these general requirements apply to specific products. The general environmental requirements under the proposal for the Ecodesign Regulation include durability, reusability, reparability, recycled content, resource efficiency, the presence of dangerous chemicals and the generation of waste materials. This regulation is a good deal for consumers and the environment, and so I voted in favour.
Digital information exchange in terrorism cases (A9-0261/2022 - Patryk Jaki)
I supported this report, which aims to enable Eurojust to fulfil its role better and in a more proactive manner when supporting and strengthening the coordination and the cooperation between the national investigating and prosecuting authorities in relation to serious crime, in particular terrorist offences.
Exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences: alignment with Union rules on the protection of personal data (A9-0041/2023 - Patryk Jaki)
Situation in Lebanon (RC-B9-0323/2023, B9-0323/2023, B9-0324/2023, B9-0325/2023, B9-0326/2023, B9-0327/2023, B9-0328/2023)
State of the EU-Cuba PDCA in the light of the recent visit of the High Representative to the island (RC-B9-0311/2023, B9-0311/2023, B9-0313/2023, B9-0320/2023, B9-0321/2023, B9-0322/2023)
I voted against the resolution as the text needed be seen in the context that the Spanish Popular Party and the far-right Vox, who drafted this regressive resolution which does not address the realities of living under a blockade.The resolution was boycotted by the S&D, Greens and The Left. The far-right and conservatives even used the text of the resolution to attack Josep Borrell, the VP/HR of the EU, just because he is from the Spanish Socialist Workers Party.The language used in the report was needlessly regressive and would not serve in any way as the basis for any constructive engagements between the European Union or its Member States with Cuba. In particular, the resolution engages with the ongoing blockade of Cuba in a glib manner that was disparaging to the point of almost denying the impact of the blockade on Cuba’s economy or the very real impact it continues to inflict on the Cuban people.In light of this Sinn Féin abstained on a series of amendments on the basis that they intended to simply further impugn Cuba arising from the amendments’ apparent connotations, while supporting an amendment calling for an end to the blockade in line with successive resolutions of United Nations General Assembly.
COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and recommendations for the future (A9-0217/2023 - Dolors Montserrat)
This report from the special COVI committee looked at the lessons learned from the pandemic across 4 pillars: health, fundamental rights, societal and economic impact, and the EU’s global relationships. While it had many good points, it had a gaping hole in terms of acknowledging the negative role the EU played in obstructing vaccine access for lower-income countries. I campaigned on this issue and saw the extent to which the EU was one of the main blockers of the TRIPS Waiver, which would have temporarily waived intellectual property rights and allowed for a cost-effective production of vaccines and treatments in lower-income countries. The report did not acknowledge this failing by the EU, and did not call for a different approach in the ongoing preparations for future pandemics. For this reason I voted against the report.
2022 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (A9-0229/2023 - Paulo Rangel)
2022 Report on Albania (A9-0204/2023 - Isabel Santos)
I supported this annual report on Albania. In 2009, Albania submitted its formal application for EU membership and this is the annual report on its progress.Among other things, the report welcomes advances in ensuring equal opportunities, and calls for further improvements in the enforcement of gender equality, property rights, data protection, rights of people with disabilities and minority rights.
Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2022 (A9-0210/2023 - Stefan Berger)
I supported this report despite some misgivings. The EIB plays a crucial role in investing in the real economy, especially in the climate transition. Unfortunately, this report supports refocusing some of this spending on militarisation and security. It is also unhelpfully weak on criticisms of greenwashing. Nevertheless, the EIB still had a huge role to play in investing and could be of use, for example, to help tackle Ireland’s housing crisis.
Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank - annual report 2022 (A9-0212/2023 - Viola von Cramon-Taubadel)
Act in Support of Ammunition Production (C9-0161/2023)
Recommendations for reform of the European Parliament’s rules on transparency, integrity, accountability and anti-corruption (A9-0215/2023 - Vladimír Bilčík, Nathalie Loiseau)
Despite reservations about certain aspects of the report, which may be misused in order to restrict the activities of MEPs, I voted in favour of the report.If the recommendations are implemented in a balanced manner then everything will be fine, but I am concerned that some in the EP may try to abuse the rules in order to score political points.I will be keeping a close eye on the recommendations as they are put into practice.
State of the SME Union (RC-B9-0346/2023, B9-0346/2023, B9-0347/2023, B9-0348/2023, B9-0349/2023)
I supported this resolution as SMEs play and must continue to play a critical role in our economy. Sensible rules for SMEs are welcome, however I do not support a call for a bonfire of regulation or other irresponsible calls.SMEs are best paced to thrive in a well-regulated economy with both private and public investment flowing.
Labelling of organic pet food (A9-0159/2023 - Martin Häusling)
I voted in favour of this legislation establishing specific labelling rules for pet food. These rules will allow pet food, in particular for cats and dogs, to bear the organic production logo of the European Union. Moreover, the organic production logo of the European Union will be mandatory for prepacked pet food labelled as organic. The rules were proposed as a result of a new legislative framework for organic products which do not allow anymore for national rules for the minimum percentage of organic ingredients in organic pet food. The draft rules clarify that pet food can be labelled as organic if at least 95% in terms of weight of its agricultural ingredients are organic.
Standards of quality and safety for substances of human origin intended for human application (A9-0250/2023 - Nathalie Colin-Oesterlé)
I voted in favour of this regulation, which will consolidate existing EU legislation on substances of human origin. This covers, for example, blood donations, tissues for transplants and donations of reproductive material. This consolidation will allow for better quality control and transport of these substances across borders, helping to ensure better care for patients across the EU. It also contains provisions for the protection of donors, including their mental health, and insists that donations of human substances should not be monetised, as this risks the exploitation of people on lower incomes.
Accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications (A9-0237/2023 - Marion Walsmann)
I supported this report on the accession of the European Union to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications.The proposal aims to designate the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) as the competent authority referred to in the Geneva Act as regards geographical indications for craft and industrial products, and to make it responsible for the administration of the Geneva Act in the EU and for notifications and communications with the International Bureau of the WIPO under the Geneva Act and the Common Regulations.
European Defence Industry Reinforcement through common Procurement Act (EDIRPA) (A9-0161/2023 - Michael Gahler, Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
I abstained on this report. Sinn Féin has always been clear that we are opposed to the militarisation of the EU. We understand that it is not the position of the Irish government or any Irish party to get involved in discussions or decisions on military aid or defence procurement as Ireland is militarily neutral. This kind of regulation flies in the face of Irish military neutrality and the position of the Irish government of remaining neutral in such matters.Sinn Féin understands that in light of the reality of Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine there is a need to supply Ukraine with the means to defend itself, and for vulnerable states across the Baltic to have the capability to deter any threat of invasion and incursions. However, Ireland is neutral and should not play any role in the deepening militarisation and expansion of a European defence industry and military-industrial complex. We do not support the militarisation of the EU’s budget especially at the cost of the Irish taxpayer and Irish neutrality.
Surface water and groundwater pollutants (A9-0238/2023 - Milan Brglez)
I voted in favour of this legislation that reduced the limits for certain polluting substances in the EU’s surface and underground water sources. This update to existing EU legislation brings the maximum pollution levels in line with the latest scientific knowledge about safe exposure levels, and adds new limits for a range of dangerous substances, including Bisphenol A and 24 PFAS or ‘forever’ chemicals, which are proven endocrine disruptors.
Renewable Energy Directive (A9-0208/2022 - Markus Pieper)
I voted in favour of the trilogue outcome on the update of the Renewable Energy Directive. The RED was updated to align with the EU’s new 2030 climate targets and to respond to the invasion of Ukraine. The EU’s binding 2030 target for the renewable energy share of energy generation will be set at 42.5%, with an aim to reach 45%. While this is a significant increase on the previous target, it is still not adequate to be in line with the aims of the Paris Agreement.Aside from the positive increases in the renewable energy targets, the RED update features some problematic aspects. The rules on forest biomass are still far too lax. Burning woody biomass can still be counted as renewable energy, even though research shows that it has a major climate and environmental impact. Biomass can be considered eligible for support within new priority zones for the acceleration of renewable energies, which introduces worrying exceptions around environmental impact assessments. Nevertheless, the overall movement of this RED update is positive, and so I supported it in view of the critical need to scale up and support renewable energy generation.
Consumer credits (A9-0212/2022 - Kateřina Konečná)
I am delighted to see the Consumer Credits rules passed thanks to The Left Group. Among its provisions is a ‘right to be forgotten’ – a measure that protects cancer survivors applying for a loan for which insurance is required, whereby they have the ‘right to be forgotten’, meaning their former illness cannot affect the insurance rates after a relevant period of time. It also implements a call I have made for social media data to be ineligible as a way of deciding whether somebody gets a loan or not.
Geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products (A9-0049/2023 - Marion Walsmann)
Geographical indications (GIs) establish intellectual property rights for products whose qualities are specially linked to a certain area of production and the producers’ ‘know-how’.I supported this proposal, which aims to establish directly applicable GI protection for products such as jewellery, textiles, porcelain etc. at an EU level, which would benefit the artisanal, crafts and rural communities in the EU, as well as consumers.
System of European Schools – state of play, challenges and perspectives (A9-0205/2023 - Ilana Cicurel)
I supported this own initiative report on the European Schools System (ESS).The own initiative report called for the board of governors to update their mission and for the Commission to perform a review, by the end of 2024, of the governance and management structures across the ESS, to assess the independence of functions and potential conflicts of interest, and to identify regulatory issues that are a hindrance to the ESS.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize MON 87419 (B9-0362/2023)
I supported the objection against the authorisation of this GMO crop for sale on the EU’s market. The GMO crop is resistant to pesticides that are no longer authorised in the EU for health reasons, exposing EU consumers to unsafe pesticide levels in imported crops. While the EFSA has given a positive opinion on this GMO, its controls do not consider real world exposure to pesticides in such crops, or the cocktail effect of exposure to multiple hazardous substances. In addition, the Commission keeps re-approving these GMO crops despite no Member State majority support, a democratic deficit which even the Commission itself has recognised.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 (B9-0363/2023)
I supported this objection. A vote on 1 June 2023 of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed delivered no opinion, meaning that the authorisation was not supported by a qualified majority of Member States, and a vote in July 2023 of the Appeal Committee again delivered no opinion. Given that it does not have qualified majority support, I supported this objection. This is a democratic deficit that the European Commission continues to perpetuate by approving GMO crops for the EU market without the consent of the required number of Member States.
EU/USA agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: extension (A9-0242/2023 - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi)
I abstained on this vote, which consented to the extension of the scientific and technological agreement between the EU and the US. In general, this agreement covers many positive areas, including cooperation in fields like environment, medicine, engineering, ICT, social sciences and space research. However, it also covers research into security and defence. Out of the EU’s 20 such agreements, the agreement with the US seems to be the only agreement covering security research. I do not believe that military research should be an area which the EU encourages through its scientific cooperation with third countries.
Single market emergency instrument (A9-0246/2023 - Andreas Schwab)
I abstained on this report as I have doubts about the need for such an instrument. The proposal empowers the EU Commission to a huge extent in times of crisis. I am unconvinced that such powers are necessary or wise and that in a real emergency they won’t simply be ignored.I keenly await the trilogue outcome.
Composition of the European Parliament (A9-0265/2023 - Loránt Vincze, Sandro Gozi)
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure with a view to strengthening integrity, independence and accountability (A9-0262/2023 - Gabriele Bischoff)
Ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (A9-0233/2023 - Javi López)
I voted in favour of this update to the EU’s air quality rules.I believe that the close interlinkages between human health and the environment are not yet fully recognised by policymakers, leading to a reluctance to adequately tackle air pollution despite the huge savings that this can bring for our health system, to say nothing of improvements to people’s overall well-being.This is also a social justice issue, as often those most affected by air pollution come from low-income and marginalised communities.The position adopted by the ENVI Committee was a good improvement on the Commission’s original proposal, insisting on alignment with the WHO’s Air Quality Guidelines. I was happy to support the position put forward by the committee.Unfortunately, there was large-scale opposition to this law from the far-right and EPP groups within Parliament. In order to ensure that the law passed, some compromises needed to be made on the final text.Nevertheless, the final compromise reached still aligns the law fully with the WHO’s guidelines. On balance, it is still a strong text and this increases the chances that the final agreement will have an ambitious approach to tackling air pollution.
Sustainable aviation fuels (ReFuelEU Aviation Initiative) (A9-0199/2022 - José Ramón Bauzá Díaz)
As part of the ‘Fit for 55’ package of proposals, the ReFuel EU Aviation initiative aims to boost the supply and demand for sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) in the EU, in line with the goal of reducing aviation’s environmental footprint to achieve the EU’s climate targets. I abstained on this proposal, as definition of SAF is still quite broad, meaning it could encompass supposedly ‘sustainable’ fuels that would not actually contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the sector. On the whole, I recognise the importance of having more sustainable fuel options for the aviation sector, but there is no point is naming certain fuels as ‘sustainable’ when they in fact cause harm to the climate or environment.
2022 Report on Türkiye (A9-0247/2023 - Nacho Sánchez Amor)
I voted in favour of this report as I agree on the strong criticism regarding the internal situation in Turkey. I agree with the analysis in the report that the Turkish legal framework for the presidential and parliamentary elections does not fully provide a basis for holding democratic elections, and of the restrictions on fundamental freedoms of minorities, women and LGBTQI people. I also deplore the continued crackdown on opposition parties, Kurdish politicians, journalists, lawyers and artists, including mass detentions prior to the elections, as well as the ongoing closure case against the People’s Democratic Party, and use of the judiciary to influence political decisions of opposition parties. I also strongly condemn Turkey’s unacceptable proposal for a two-state solution in Cyprus instead of moving towards unifying the island under the Cypriot government, and deplore any movement by the EU to disregard Turkey’s role in the partition of Cyprus to enable the EU to pursue its own selfish and ‘strategic’ bilateral interests with Turkey.
Relations with Belarus (A9-0258/2023 - Petras Auštrevičius)
I voted in favour of this report as it strongly criticises the human rights violations and violence perpetrated by the Belarusian authorities against protestors, the use of torture against political prisoners, and repression of trade unions. The report strongly condemns the acts of Lukashenko and his role in Russia's invasion of Ukraine regarding the illegal transfer of children from Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine to Belarus. I support the report's calls for Belarus to immediately commute all death sentences and establish an immediate moratorium on the use of the death penalty.I also agree with the sentiments of the report calling for support for democratic activists in Belarus in light of the, internationally deemed, illegitimate Belarussian presidential election result from 2020. However, I am concerned with the emphasis in parallel of designating non-state entities as the sole and true representatives of Belarus without exhausting all diplomatic options first.
Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (A9-0260/2023 - Nicola Beer)
While we need a lot of critical raw materials (CRMs) for the energy transition, the EU has not taken the best approach to improving supplies of CRM. The EU’s approach has been to prioritise the EU’s autonomy in this area above all else. Blanket statements that consider a particular type of industrial activity to be in the public interest are worrying as this allows for the activity to be pursued in protected areas, even if this would be against the best interest of the protected site and the local community.In addition, there needs to be much more of a focus on recycling of CRMs, and on reducing demand for CRMs. When mining takes place within the EU, this should be both environmentally and socially sustainable, ensuring the informed consent of local communities. We also need to work in partnership with third countries to ensure better environmental protection and respect for human rights.I voted for the amendments that would prevent CRM projects overriding nature protection laws, and seek to preserve the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. Unfortunately, most of these did not receive majority support. I therefore abstained on the final vote.
Opening of negotiations of an agreement with the United States of America on strengthening international supply chains of critical minerals (B9-0366/2023)
I voted in favour of this resolution as it calls for the Commission to address outstanding trade frictions in EU-US relations, assess the potential impact of the US Inflation Reduction Act on the EU, ambition with regard to sustainability and labour provisions and the reference to International Labour Organization fundamental principles and rights at work, and the need to prohibit products made with forced labour, support for transatlantic cooperation, including through international forums, on fair and inclusive standardisation for the lifecycle assessment and the extraction, labelling and recycling of critical minerals.
Amending the proposed mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context (A9-0252/2023 - Sandro Gozi)
I supported this report from the REGI Committee. The proposal for such a mechanism is interesting and worth progressing. Among other things, this mechanism could be an interesting model for a better working cross-border cooperation pending reunification of Ireland.I urge the Council to look again at its potential.
Regulation of prostitution in the EU: its cross-border implications and impact on gender equality and women’s rights (A9-0240/2023 - Maria Noichl)
I voted in favour of this report, following Sinn Féin’s established policy, which supports the Nordic/Equality model. Countries with full legalisation on all aspects of prostitution have much higher human trafficking rates and much larger proportions of men purchasing sex. The Nordic model aims to decrease demand for the purchase of sex and so reduce the exploitation of those working in prostitution.However, Sinn Féin recognises that the proper implementation of the Nordic model requires the introduction of wrap-around supports, resources and pathways out of prostitution. These were not adequately delivered on when legislation implementing the Nordic model in Ireland was put forward.A full implementation of the Nordic model also requires that those in prostitution are not criminalised, either directly or indirectly (e.g. police raids, increased monitoring, threats of deportation). The Gardaí need adequate training to ensure that they know how to support women and girls working in prostitution, not indirectly criminalise them. Currently, NGOs provide this training but it needs to become a centralised part of the Gardaí’s formation.
The future of the European book sector (A9-0257/2023 - Tomasz Frankowski)
Farm Sustainability Data Network (A9-0075/2023 - Jérémy Decerle)
I voted in favour of this update of the farm accountancy data network to allow it to collect social and environmental as well as economic data.This change will bring a wealth of new information about social and ecological conditions of farms in Europe, which will help guide evidence-based policies that take care of farmers, rural communities and the environment.
Establishing the Ukraine Facility (A9-0286/2023 - Michael Gahler, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (‘STEP’) (A9-0290/2023 - José Manuel Fernandes, Christian Ehler)
The Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP) is a funding instrument intended as a response to the US Inflation Reduction Act. It aims to support the development of ‘critical technologies’ that contribute to the EU’s goals while reducing dependency on external suppliers.Critical technologies can be digital technologies, ‘clean’ technologies and biotechnology. However, this includes security and defence technologies, and STEP allocates an additional EUR 1.5bn to the European Defence Fund. Its definition of clean technologies include nuclear energy and CCS/U. It also moves funds that were initially dedicated to public authorities and redirects them towards private enterprises with little social conditionality, and little requirements to respect the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle.Sinn Féin is opposed to the use of EU funding for military purposes, and for the unfettered diversion of public monies to private companies without adequate conditions attached. For this reason, I voted against the proposal.
Fisheries control (A9-0016/2021 - Clara Aguilera)
The 2009 control regulation established a control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy and establishing a level playing field across the EU on fisheries control.Whilst I agree that fishers must adhere to the highest standards in order to protect fish stocks and prevent IUU fishing, the industry in Ireland is predominantly small scale and already hard pressed as a result of the COVID pandemic and Brexit.It has been well documented that there is significant tension between the regulatory body for fisheries control and the fishing industry in Ireland, and one of the main concerns is that there are no additional means for appeal or recourse, for example a fisheries ombudsman.Therefore I believe a balanced approach is required which acknowledges that small-scale fishing is not the main threat to sustainable fish stocks. The option to amend the proposal to better protect small-scale fisheries was voted down, therefore I voted against the overall proposal.
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2024 - all sections (A9-0288/2023 - Siegfried Mureşan, Nils Ušakovs)
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Additional technical screening criteria (B9-0431/2023)
I voted against this objection. The objecting MEPs were opposed to a delegated act under the Taxonomy Regulation, which sets standards as to what type of vehicles and transport infrastructure should be considered as contributing significantly to climate change mitigation/adaption without causing harm to other environmental objectives, allowing them to be considered ‘green’ investments for the purposes of the Sustainable Finance Taxonomy. The Commission proposed that only zero-emission vehicles (i.e. electric vehicles), electric charging infrastructure and zero-emission aircrafts can be considered to meet these criteria. The objecting MEPs considered that low-emission vehicles running on hydrogen, gas and biofuels should also be considered green investments. As this is not scientifically sound, or on line with the strict legal rules of the Taxonomy, I voted against this objection.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): European Sustainability Reporting Standards (B9-0426/2023)
This objection related to a delegated act under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. It requires large companies and listed SMEs to report on their sustainability impacts in their annual reporting. The delegated act establishes reporting standards that provide a template for companies doing this reporting. Once companies start reporting this information, it will be possible to monitor and improve their sustainability performance. The objecting MEPs considered that the new rules would be too burdensome for companies. I disagree, and instead I view these new rules as being crucial for putting into practice the requirements for businesses to improve their environmental and human rights impacts. This is something I have long been pushing for in the European Parliament, and it is a demand strongly supported by the Irish people. For this reason, I voted against the objection.
Schengen area: digitalisation of the visa procedure (A9-0025/2023 - Matjaž Nemec)
I voted in favour of digitalising the process of requesting and issuing short-stay visas in the EU (Schengen visas) via a common online platform, ensuring fewer security risks. Importantly, this includes data protection safeguards and safeguards to ensure that persons with disadvantages (including of digital illiteracy) are not excluded.
Schengen area: amending the Visa Sticker Regulation (A9-0268/2023 - Matjaž Nemec)
I voted in favour of digitalising the process of requesting and issuing short-stay visas in the EU (Schengen visas) via a common online platform, ensuring less security risks. Importantly this includes data protection safeguards and safeguards to ensure that persons with disadvantages (including of digital illiteracy) are not excluded.
Recent developments in the Serbia-Kosovo dialogue, including the situation in the northern municipalities in Kosovo (RC-B9-0437/2023, B9-0437/2023, B9-0439/2023, B9-0440/2023, B9-0441/2023, B9-0446/2023)
In recognising Kosovar independence I voted in favour of de-escalating situation in the northern municipalities of Kosovo. It is important that there is full respect for the Serbian minority in Kosovo. I do not agree that increased troop deployment and armament by EU Member States and NATO will help this de-escalation.
The despicable terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel, Israel’s right to defend itself in line with humanitarian and international law and the humanitarian situation in Gaza (RC-B9-0436/2023, B9-0436/2023, B9-0438/2023, B9-0442/2023, B9-0444/2023, B9-0445/2023, B9-0447/2023, B9-0448/2023)
While I fully condemn the Hamas attack on Israeli civilians, and voted to do so in the separate votes on the relevant points, the resolution as a whole was very one-sided. It did not support a ceasefire and did not did not insist that the Israeli right to self-defence comply with international law. Nor did it condemn ongoing breaches of international law by Israel. For this reason, I voted against the resolution.
European protein strategy (A9-0281/2023 - Emma Wiesner)
I voted in favour of this report, on which I was the lead negotiator for the Left group. The report anticipates the Protein Strategy that the Commission intends to launch in 2024, and makes a number of calls as to what this strategy should contain. The crux of this report is the need to increase the production of protein crops for food and animal feed within the EU. This should decrease the EU’s dependence on imported proteins which are often linked to deforestation, while bringing advantages to EU farming in terms of soil quality and new possibilities for the circular economy. I am pleased that the report includes particularly positive language about the benefits of grass-based extensive animal agriculture compared to intensive farming, and the references about the need to maintain the viability of the European fisheries sector. While I disagree with some aspects of the report, such as references to New Genomic Techniques and carbon removal certifications, overall I feel the compromise reached was a positive one.
Generational renewal in the EU farms of the future (A9-0283/2023 - Isabel Carvalhais)
Data Act (A9-0031/2023 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)
I voted in favour of this trilogue outcome, as it provides a secure framework for the sharing of data between businesses, consumers and governments for research purposes, and for the furthering of innovation and public services. In particular, I supported the inclusion of stricter rules around the sharing of data in emergency situations.
Amending certain Regulations as regards the establishment and functioning of the European single access point (ESAP) (A9-0024/2023 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
European single access point (ESAP): access to information in relation to financial services, capital markets and sustainability (A9-0026/2023 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
Amending certain Directives as regards the establishment and functioning of the European single access point (ESAP) (A9-0023/2023 - Pedro Silva Pereira)
Settlement discipline, cross-border provision of services, supervisory cooperation, provision of banking-type ancillary services and requirements for third-country central securities depositories (A9-0047/2023 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
European environmental economic accounts: new modules (A9-0296/2023 - Pascal Canfin)
Conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO) (A9-0279/2023 - Grace O'Sullivan)
I supported this report, which proposes to bring conservation and enforcement measures that were adopted by the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation at its annual meeting in September 2022 into EU law.The North Atlantic Fisheries Organisation is the regional fisheries management organisation responsible for managing fishery resources in my own constituency, and across the Northwest Atlantic. It is important that its duties are enumerated and implemented, particularly those relating to conservation.
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (A9-0311/2023 - Anna Zalewska)
This report’s intention was to address a legal shortcoming that was identified by the Court of Justice of the European Union, regarding legislation on the waste management of solar PV panels that was enacted after the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive had to be adapted to acknowledge this new solar panel legislation. I supported this report, recognising the need to provide legal certainty.
EU/Madagascar Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Implementing Protocol (2023-2027) (A9-0299/2023 - Clara Aguilera)
I abstained on this vote as, whilst it is important that we engage with the Madagascan authorities on their fishing practices, I remain concerned that the European Union is not doing enough to prevent harmful and illegal fishing practices and the widespread destruction of the marine habitat in Madagascar, directly impacting over one million ordinary people from coastal fishing communities.
Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) (A9-0298/2023 - Alexandr Vondra)
This regulation is part of the zero-pollution ambition from the European Green Deal and aims to reduce air pollution. It does this by setting new standards for emission limits and methods to measure these for new cars, vans, buses and trucks. Road transport is the biggest source of air pollution in cities and it is estimated that pollution from road transport causes 70 000 premature deaths every year in the EU.I did not support the committee or Commission proposals, as I felt there was a lack of ambition in both. I did support referral for interinstitutional negotiations.
System of own resources of the European Union (A9-0295/2023 - José Manuel Fernandes, Valérie Hayer)
I voted against this report as I am opposed to the EU introducing new so-called ‘own resources.’In particular this report supports the addition of a new own resource based on corporate tax revenue. I strongly oppose this new tax, not only on the grounds that it is unfair to Ireland in its design, but on the principle that there should be no new own resources.
Strengthening the right to participate: legitimacy and resilience of electoral processes in illiberal political systems and authoritarian regimes (A9-0323/2023 - Nacho Sánchez Amor)
I voted in favour of this report as it includes some important democratic standards that should be upheld.However, I have some concerns about the way in which it conflates democracy and legitimacy with the geo-strategic interests of the EU, as well as the tendency of the EU to turn a blind eye to governments in allied countries breaching these standards.
Effectiveness of the EU sanctions on Russia (RC-B9-0453/2023, B9-0453/2023, B9-0454/2023, B9-0455/2023, B9-0456/2023, B9-0457/2023)
I voted in favour of these resolutions which dealt with the efficacy of current EU sanctions on Russia as a result of its ongoing illegal invasion of Ukraine.In particular, I supported measures to set deadlines for the remaining foreign bank to exit the Russian market and to compel Member States to cease deliveries of military supplies, such as computer components, to Russia.Whilst I supported measures to investigate and punish companies who violate these sanctions, I have some concerns about the proposal that these companies would receive a blanket cut-off from all EU funds.
High common level of cybersecurity at the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union (A9-0064/2023 - Henna Virkkunen)
Catch documentation programme for bluefin tuna (A9-0172/2021 - Gabriel Mato)
I voted in favour of this proposal, which sets out the rules for a Union bluefin tuna catch documentation programme in order to implement conservation and management measures adopted by ICCAT, under its bluefin tuna catch documentation scheme. The latter’s purpose is to identify the origin of all bluefin tuna.Whilst I voted in favour of this report, I believe it is important for Irish fishers to be allocated a quota for bluefin tuna that is in Irish oceans.
Common rules promoting the repair of goods (A9-0316/2023 - René Repasi)
I supported this text, the intention of which is to encourage the public to repair, rather than replace, defective goods. I would rather that more categories of items were encompassed in this text, but overall I believe this text makes a positive environmental contribution, and I was happy to support it.
Framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology products manufacturing ecosystem (Net Zero Industry Act) (A9-0343/2023 - Christian Ehler)
I opposed this text, as I believe whilst innovation is crucial, here the objective of innovation was given priority at the expense of other social and environmental objectives. I regret that amendments tabled by my grouping to set strong social and environmental criteria for the allocation of these public subsidies were rejected. For me, the amendments passed during the vote watered down the environmental spirit of the legislation to such an extent that I could no longer support it.
Union certification framework for carbon removals (A9-0329/2023 - Lídia Pereira)
I abstained on this measure, as I have concerns at how the carbon removal certificate will be used. I regret that there is no pro-active application of these certifications, so farmers in Midlands-North-West who have already been engaged in carbon farming would not be able to reap the certification of their work to date. I also have serious concerns that companies could engage in greenwashing through using carbon certs purchased from others to offset their own carbon emissions. For me, whilst it is positive that a framework would be put in place to quantify the levels of carbon being removed, the weak regulation of the use of these certificates opens the door too widely to potential human rights abuses and greenwashing from private companies.
Strengthening the CO2 emission performance targets for new heavy-duty vehicles (A9-0313/2023 - Bas Eickhout)
I supported this proposal, which aims to contribute to the target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to at least 55 % below 1990 levels by 2030, and to climate neutrality by 2050. In order to remain the lead in this sector and retain production jobs, the EU requires fast and sweeping transition. It is positive that almost all manufacturers and fleet operators have already signed pledges to be zero-emission or fossil free by 2040.
EU framework for the social and professional situation of artists and workers in the cultural and creative sectors (A9-0304/2023 - Antonius Manders, Domènec Ruiz Devesa)
I voted in favour of this legislative initiative procedure on the rights of artists and workers in the cultural and creative sectors. The report focuses on fair wages and labour practices, addressing gender inequality, mobility for workers etc. This is a positive and progressive report that I was happy to support.
UN Climate Change Conference 2023 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (COP28) (B9-0458/2023)
Reducing inequalities and promoting social inclusion in times of crisis for children and their families (A9-0360/2023 - Sandra Pereira)
Implementation of the European Solidarity Corps programme 2021-2027 (A9-0308/2023 - Michaela Šojdrová)
Implementation of the Regulation establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel (A9-0353/2023 - Bert-Jan Ruissen)
I supported this implementation report on a Council Regulation that was adopted in 2007, establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel.Among other things, the report was strong on tackling IUU fishing, and calls on the Member States to remove obsolete dams and other barriers to enable migration and prevent deaths.
EU/Montenegro Agreement: operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Montenegro (A9-0369/2023 - Lena Düpont)
VAT: rules for the digital age (A9-0327/2023 - Olivier Chastel)
VAT: taxable persons, special scheme and special arrangements for declaration and payment relating to distance sales of imported goods (A9-0320/2023 - Olivier Chastel)
Sustainable use of plant protection products (A9-0339/2023 - Sarah Wiener)
Packaging and packaging waste (A9-0319/2023 - Frédérique Ries)
Digitalisation and Administrative Law (A9-0309/2023 - Karen Melchior)
I supported this report on improving administration in an increasingly digitalised world. Among other things, the report highlights that citizens are increasingly being burdened by the EU administration and they are entitled to expect a high level of transparency, efficiency, swift execution and responsiveness from it.
Proposals of the European Parliament for the amendment of the Treaties (A9-0337/2023 - Guy Verhofstadt, Sven Simon, Gabriele Bischoff, Daniel Freund, Helmut Scholz)
Negotiations on a status agreement on operational activities carried out by Frontex in Mauritania (A9-0358/2023 - Tineke Strik)
I voted in favour of this position of the EP on negotiations between the Commission and Mauritania, as it is sound on fundamental rights and on Frontex staff being held accountable under EU or Member State laws.I look forward to an eventual agreement coming back to the European Parliament for consent with these principles intact.
Digitalisation of cross-border judicial cooperation (A9-0062/2023 - Emil Radev, Marina Kaljurand)
Digitalisation of cross-border judicial cooperation (amendment of certain directives and framework decisions) (A9-0063/2023 - Emil Radev, Marina Kaljurand)
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2022 (A9-0333/2023 - Alex Agius Saliba)
Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (A9-0331/2023 - Seán Kelly, Andreas Schieder)
I voted in favour of this comprehensive implementation report, which reminds the British Government of its commitments under the TCA (and Withdrawal Agreement).It stresses that the British still have to do a lot to implement the Protocol/Windsor Framework. It also expresses concern on certain issues that may cause future problems.
Innovative humanitarian aid strategy: spotlight on current and forgotten crises (A9-0321/2023 - Carlos Zorrinho)
Job creation – the just transition and impact investments (A9-0342/2023 - Sara Matthieu)
I supported this own-initiative report, which, among other things, emphasised that a transition towards sustainable, renewable and circular economies and societies generates the potential both to create significant numbers of new jobs and to transform existing employment into green and sustainable jobs in most sectors.
European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law Making covering 2020, 2021 and 2022 (A9-0310/2023 - Catharina Rinzema)
Setting up the delegations to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly, to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary Assembly, and to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary Assembly, and defining their numerical strength (B9-0497/2023)
Foodstuffs for human consumption: amending certain 'Breakfast' Directives (A9-0385/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber)
Recognition of professional qualifications: nurses responsible for general care trained in Romania (A9-0381/2023 - Adam Bielan)
Authorisation empowering France to negotiate a bilateral agreement with Algeria concerning judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters (A9-0356/2023 - Ilana Cicurel)
Authorisation empowering France to negotiate a bilateral agreement with Algeria concerning judicial cooperation in civil matters related to family law (A9-0355/2023 - Ilana Cicurel)
Minimum requirements on minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods in the occasional passenger transport sector (A9-0370/2023 - Henna Virkkunen)
Framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (A9-0260/2023 - Nicola Beer)
I abstained on this report. Whilst I recognise the need for critical raw materials (CRMs) for the energy transition, the EU has not taken the best approach to improving supplies of CRM. The EU’s approach has been to prioritise the EU’s autonomy in this area above all else. Blanket statements that consider a particular type of industrial activity to be in the public interest are worrying as this allows for the activity to be pursued in protected areas, even if this would be against the best interest of the protected site and the local community.
The European Elections 2024 (A9-0332/2023 - Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Sven Simon)
Implementation of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe (A9-0374/2023 - Tomas Tobé, Pedro Marques, Charles Goerens, Michael Gahler)
Addictive design of online services and consumer protection in the EU single market (A9-0340/2023 - Kim Van Sparrentak)
I voted in favour of this action to tackle the addictive design features used by technology companies. The increased use of these features goes hand in hand with a rise in psychological problems stemming from the excessive use of online services.I am particularly concerned about the vulnerability of young people in this regard. Unfortunately, Parliament rejected proposals to strengthen the measures taken, but at least this is an important start.
Role of tax policy in times of crisis (A9-0336/2023 - Kira Marie Peter-Hansen)
Further reform of corporate taxation rules (A9-0359/2023 - Isabel Benjumea Benjumea)
Reshaping the future framework of EU structural funds to support regions particularly affected by challenges related to the automotive, green and digital transitions (A9-0326/2023 - Susana Solís Pérez)
European Health Data Space (A9-0395/2023 - Tomislav Sokol, Annalisa Tardino)
Role of EU development policy in transforming the extractive industries for sustainable development in developing countries (A9-0322/2023 - Barry Andrews)
EU development cooperation to enhance access to education and training in developing countries (A9-0338/2023 - György Hölvényi)
Non-communicable diseases (A9-0366/2023 - Erik Poulsen)
Non-communicable diseases account for 80% of diseases in the EU. I supported this report, which proposes positive steps that can be taken to address this number, including a focus on early diagnosis, and increased investment in innovation to address this rise in NCD diagnoses. In particularly, I appreciate that the report acknowledges the link between social inequality and increased risk of NCDs.
EU-US relations (A9-0372/2023 - Tonino Picula)
I abstained on this report. It includes some positive elements around multilateralism, climate change, peaceful resolution of conflicts, arms control, disarmament, the fight against racism, the fight against inequalities and ecological transformation. However, the report is very problematic in relation to NATO, military expenditure and closer EU/US military cooperation.
EU-China relations (A9-0375/2023 - Hilde Vautmans)
Implementation of the Treaty provisions on special legislative procedures (A9-0384/2023 - Victor Negrescu)
I abstained on this report. I agree that the Council shouldn’t abuse its powers by excluding or marginalising the EP with regard to special legislative procedures. However, the assumption of the report is that the Parliament is always right, taking as one of its examples transnational lists – something that is not in the interest of Member States.
30 years of Copenhagen criteria - giving further impetus to EU enlargement policy (RC-B9-0500/2023, B9-0500/2023, B9-0501/2023, B9-0502/2023, B9-0504/2023, B9-0505/2023, B9-0506/2023)
Implementation of the 2018 Geo-blocking Regulation in the digital single market (A9-0335/2023 - Beata Mazurek)
I supported this proposal, as well as the inclusion of audio-visual services within its remit, as we have seen first-hand the negative impacts of geo-blocking on our own island.I also supported an amendment that would bind the Commission to propose solutions that would guarantee the sustainability of business models in the cultural and creative industries – particularly for self-employed people and SMEs – if audio-visual services were no longer subject to geo-blocking.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Maximum residue levels for fipronil (B9-0488/2023)
Increasing innovation, industrial and technological competitiveness (A9-0383/2023 - Tsvetelina Penkova)
I abstained on this report. I acknowledge the report had positive elements, in particular the call to address regional disparities and encouraging underrepresented groups to get involved in the sector, as well as a recognition of the needs of the cultural and creative sector. However, there were a number of areas I had concerns with: namely, the extent of the deregulation contained within the report, the call for softer environmental controls, and the absence of recognition of the conditions of workers in the industry.
Jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition of decisions and acceptance of authentic instruments in matters of parenthood and creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood (A9-0368/2023 - Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques)
Young researchers (B9-0491/2023)
I was happy to support this report, which acknowledges the many challenges facing young researchers and puts forward progressive solutions to address these. The precariousness of this profession cannot continue; this is leading to brain drain and many talented Irish researchers leaving the field, which is a loss to us all. I also appreciated that the report recognised the gender imbalance within the profession, as well as broadening the definition of ‘young researcher’ to include those who are starting out in the field, regardless of age.
European Hydrogen Bank (A9-0379/2023 - Robert Hajšel)
I voted against this report. I support the switch to hydrogen where it relates to renewable energies. However, currently only 5% of hydrogen is produced through renewable energy; the remaining 95% is produced by fossil fuels. I am extremely concerned about public money being used to provide subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. I am also concerned about the high risk of neo-colonialism, land grabbing and other human rights abuses as a result.
Ozone depleting substances (A9-0050/2023 - Jessica Polfjärd)
I supported this regulation, which will limit and eventually phase out ozone depleting substances (ODSs). These are strong greenhouse gases that damage the ozone layer and increase the risk of global warming, and I am glad that Parliament is taking a proactive role in the phase-out and finding of suitable alternatives.
Fluorinated gases regulation (A9-0048/2023 - Bas Eickhout)
Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association process (codification) (A9-0001/2024 - Magdalena Adamowicz)
Debt-equity bias reduction allowance and limiting the deductibility of interest for corporate income tax purposes (A9-0387/2023 - Luděk Niedermayer)
Implementation of the Erasmus+ programme 2021-2027 (A9-0413/2023 - Milan Zver)
Implementation of the Creative Europe programme 2021-2027 (A9-0425/2023 - Massimiliano Smeriglio)
I supported this own initiative implementation report for the Creative Europe programme 2021-2027. Among other things, the report welcomes the programme’s response in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and highlights that the programme continues to generate significant interest within the cultural, creative and audio-visual sectors.
Implementation of the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values programme 2021-2027 – citizens' engagement and participation (A9-0392/2023 - Łukasz Kohut)
I supported this own initiative implementation report for the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values (CERV) programme 2021-2027. The report noted that the implementation of the CERV programme is still in its early stages. The report calls on the Commission to establish the Civil Dialogue Group to ensure regular, open, and transparent dialogue to strengthen civil dialogue throughout the programme in such a way as to support a two-way process between institutions at all levels and all relevant stakeholders.
Implementation of territorial development (CPR, Title III, Chapter II) and its application in the European Territorial agenda 2030 (A9-0420/2023 - Marcos Ros Sempere)
Competition policy – annual report 2023 (A9-0427/2023 - Stéphanie Yon-Courtin)
Role of the European Parliament and its parliamentary diplomacy in the EU’s foreign and security policy (A9-0405/2023 - Jordi Solé)
I voted in favour of this report, which focuses on diplomacy as the main way to solve international conflicts and global challenges, including the climate crisis, gender equality and LGBTI rights. It highlights the potential positive role that the European Parliament could play in promoting dialogue on an international level.I welcome the call for the involvement of civil society and non-state institutions in monitoring the EU’s foreign policy. However, I would not agree with an increased role for the EEAS at the expense of the foreign policy of Member States.
Electric aviation – a solution for short- and mid-range flights (A9-0438/2023 - Erik Bergkvist)
Current and future challenges regarding cross-border cooperation with neighbouring countries (A9-0415/2023 - Daniel Buda)
I supported this report, which encourages greater cross-border cooperation and recognises that stronger investment is required to support this. As a Midlands-North-West MEP, I have taken an active role in the campaign for the reopening of the Western Rail Corridor. I am glad that this report acknowledges the need for EU infrastructure strategies that acknowledge the importance of road and rail infrastructure in cross-border regions such as those in my constituency. The report also acknowledges the need for greater cross-border cooperation on tackling climate change.
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Maximum residue levels for thiacloprid (B9-0057/2024)
I supported this measure, which opposes the Commission’s proposal to maintain import tolerances for residues of thiacloprid (an insecticide) in food. This insecticide was banned in the EU in 2020. It is unfair that a double standard has been created between EU and non-EU farmers in terms of thiacloprid use, and I voted in favour of this measure, to ensure EU farmers are not at a disadvantage.
Empowering consumers for the green transition (A9-0099/2023 - Biljana Borzan)
I supported this measure, as it is important to me that we continue to take action against greenwashing, and protect people from misleading environmental claims. Companies should not be able to buy their way into ‘carbon neutral’ claims on their products; this measure will restrict company’s ability to pay to ‘offset’ their emissions. Crucially, it will also prevent the misleading use of claims such as ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘natural’ and ‘biodegradable’ without clear proof being shown of this.
Mercury: dental amalgam and other mercury-added products subject to manufacturing, import and export restrictions (A9-0002/2024 - Marlene Mortler)
It is accepted that mercury is dangerous to human health and the environment. This proposal will ban the use and export of dental amalgam, which is the last remaining substantive use of mercury. I was glad to support this proposal, which improves upon the Irish Government’s ambitions of a phase out of the use of dental amalgam by 2030.
Cultural diversity and the conditions for authors in the European music streaming market (A9-0388/2023 - Ibán García Del Blanco)
Promotion of the freedom of scientific research in the EU (A9-0393/2023 - Christian Ehler)
I voted in favour of this report, which reaffirmed the European Parliament’s commitment to the protection of academic freedom, and specifically in the context of scientific research. I am glad that the report, whilst promoting the freedom of scientific research, acknowledges the issues facing those working in the field, namely job insecurity and preciousness of funding, as well as the gender imbalance in scientific academia and research.
Implementation of the Treaty provisions on national parliaments (A9-0429/2023 - Paulo Rangel)
I abstained on this report. It includes some positive elements such as advocating a stronger role for national parliaments, particularly on their right to information and scrutiny of their governments with regard to EU affairs. However, I am concerned about how it uses increased involvement of national parliaments as a means of reinforcing CSDP, and undermining national security and defence policy.
Building a comprehensive European port strategy (A9-0443/2023 - Tom Berendsen)
This own-initiative report calls on the Commission to present an EU strategic policy framework to reduce and limit the influence and financial and operational control by non-EU countries, with a large focus on China. Whilst I agree that the EU should develop a port strategy, such a strategy should be more focused on sustainability and advancement of port workers’ rights, rather than on the geopolitical credentials/ambitions of the EU. Therefore, I abstained.
Implementation of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (A9-0400/2023 - Javier Moreno Sánchez)
I voted against this report which is pushing for the ratification of CETA by Member States that have not yet done so (including Ireland). Using the pretext of ‘Europe’s need to diversify their supply chains amidst geopolitical uncertainties’, the report doesn’t recognise the flaws of the agreement nor does it respect the constitutional provisions of certain Member States.
Security and defence implications of China's influence on critical infrastructure in the European Union (A9-0401/2023 - Klemen Grošelj)
I rejected this report. It scandalously characterises all Chinese involvement in the world economy as aggressive and militaristic. We must hold all countries including in the EU to the highest human rights standards, but this approach of scaremongering does not serve investment or good relations in any way.
Policy implications of the development of virtual worlds – civil, company, commercial and intellectual property law issues (A9-0442/2023 - Axel Voss, Ibán García Del Blanco)
I supported this report, which focuses on the concepts of ‘metaverse’ and ‘virtual world’ and their lack of consolidated definitions. Among other things, this report stresses that virtual worlds accessible in the EU should respect ethical values, principles and fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
European historical consciousness (A9-0402/2023 - Sabine Verheyen)
The report acknowledges that the diverse and often conflicting histories of European nations and states make any effort to deal with history at a political level a difficult and potentially dangerous endeavour, and that attempts to steer how to commemorate and interpret the past always prove to be challenging. The report also stresses the role of education and calls on the Member States to update current curricula and teaching methodologies with a view to shifting focus from national towards European and global history and in order to allow for more emphasis on a supranational historical understanding. Education is a competence of the Member States; I therefore abstained on this report as it stretches beyond the competencies of the EU where it calls for our education curriculum to amended.
EU development cooperation in support of access to energy in developing countries (A9-0441/2023 - Caroline Roose)
I supported this own initiative report which addresses the issue of access to energy in developing countries. Among other things, the report recalls that access to universal, affordable and sustainable energy is a basic human right and a precondition for achieving the SDGs and attaining the objective of leaving no one behind.
Virtual worlds – opportunities, risks and policy implications for the single market (A9-0397/2023 - Pablo Arias Echeverría)
I supported this own initiative report, which provides feedback on the regulatory gaps that need to be filled as the presence of ‘virtual worlds’ greatens. Whilst there is great potential in virtual worlds, there are also gaps in protection that must be filled: namely, consumer protection from misleading advertising, child safety, and the prevention of virtual crime.
Role of preventive diplomacy in tackling frozen conflicts around the world – missed opportunity or change for the future? (A9-0404/2023 - Željana Zovko)
Implementation report on Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (A9-0416/2023 - Tilly Metz)
I supported this own initiative report, which highlights the delay in counteracting misleading claims in the labelling and advertising of foods. Brands should not be allowed to label products as ‘low fat’ or ‘high fibre’ without providing clear evidence of the same. I am conscious of the need to ensure there is also not a divergence in product labelling on the island of Ireland.
Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - combating fraud - annual report 2022 (A9-0434/2023 - Maria Grapini)
Shaping the EU’s position on the UN binding instrument on business and human rights, in particular on access to remedy and the protection of victims (A9-0421/2023 - Heidi Hautala)
I supported this report, which gives support for a broad reaching international legally binding instrument to regulate corporations and businesses who commit human rights abuses. Companies who commit human rights abuses must be held to account, and this report is a positive step forward in that regard.
Extending the list of EU crimes to hate speech and hate crime (A9-0377/2023 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa)
Implementation of the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation in fisheries and aquaculture - Regulation (EU) 1379/2013 (A9-0406/2023 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
Gender aspects of the rising cost of living and the impact of the energy crisis (A9-0430/2023 - Alice Kuhnke)
I supported this report, which acknowledges the disproportionate impact of the cost of living crisis on women.Women in Ireland often act as the ‘shock absorbers’ of the cost of living crisis ‒ going without food, clothing or heating to protect and provide for their families.Parliament must be conscious of the gendered impact of its policy decisions.
Geothermal energy (A9-0432/2023 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
I supported this report, which calls on the Commission to present an EU geothermal strategy.Geothermal energy as a renewable electricity resource is underutilised in the EU at present; we as a Parliament must examine and address the obstacles facing Member States in developing geothermal energy as a viable resource.
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2022 and 2023 (A9-0376/2023 - Katarina Barley)
Humanitarian situation in Gaza, the need to reach a ceasefire and the risks of regional escalation (RC-B9-0068/2024, B9-0068/2024, B9-0069/2024, B9-0071/2024, B9-0073/2024, B9-0075/2024, B9-0077/2024)
I voted against this resolution, which fails to call for a meaningful ceasefire, effectively endorses the extreme policies of the current Israeli Government and leaves Palestinian civilians (including women and children) exposed to death on a mass scale due to Israeli bombs as well as the Israeli-created conditions of famine.
Amending Council Decision 2009/917/JHA, as regards its alignment with Union rules on the protection of personal data (A9-0361/2023 - Cornelia Ernst)
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (A9-0311/2023 - Anna Zalewska)
This file addresses a lacuna identified by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Waste Electrical Equipment Directive. The directive needed to be adapted to acknowledge new solar panel legislation enacted after the original directive. I supported this, recognising the need for legal certainty.
Measures for a high level of public sector interoperability across the Union (Interoperable Europe Act) (A9-0254/2023 - Ivars Ijabs)
I supported this regulation, which lays down measures to promote the cross-border interoperability of network and information systems used to manage public services. I have seen the benefits that cross-border provision of healthcare has brought to my constituents in Midlands North West, and I support continuing and increased cooperation between EU Member States in these realms.
Amendments to the regulation on management, conservation and control measures applicable in the ICCAT Convention Area and the regulation on a multiannual management plan for bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean (A9-0301/2023 - Clara Aguilera)
Empowering the French Republic to negotiate, sign and conclude an international agreement on the safety and interoperability requirements within the Channel Fixed Link (A9-0018/2024 - Petar Vitanov)
Conclusion of the Sustainable Investment Facilitation Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Angola (A9-0005/2024 - Joachim Schuster)
This Agreement gives corporate lobbies the right to examine social and environmental laws before they are implemented in Angola, with Angola being liable to arbitration processes upon non-compliance.I could not support this measure, as I am concerned that the agreement would allow European oil giants to increase their influence in fossil fuels abroad. If we truly want to work alongside Angola to support their development, this should be on a voluntary rather than mandatory basis.
Amendments to the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) and to the Directive relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITSD) (A9-0020/2023 - Isabel Benjumea Benjumea)
Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed (A9-0014/2024 - Jessica Polfjärd)
I recognise that there is great potential to be explored with the emergence of new genomic techniques, but this cannot happen in a regulatory vacuum. NGTS are new and emerging, and we need to see some regulation retained, particularly surrounding transparency for consumers: Irish people should be fully informed on the food they and their families are consuming. For this reason, I abstained.
Norway's recent decision to advance seabed mining in the Arctic (B9-0095/2024)
Automated data exchange for police cooperation (“Prüm II”) (A9-0200/2023 - Paulo Rangel)
I voted to replace and upgrade the existing Prüm decisions, to provide for an upgraded technical solution for data exchange.I welcome that Prüm II can be used to search for missing persons for humanitarian reasons, as well as the search of unidentified human remains.The new categories of data exchange need to be subject to proper oversight.
The EU priorities for the 68th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (B9-0091/2024)
I was happy to support this measure, which provides a mandate for the European Parliament at the UN Commission on the Status of Women session in March 2024. The report covered a wide range of important topics, including tackling gender-based violence, female poverty, and sexual and reproductive health and rights.
Implementation report on the EU LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025 (A9-0030/2024 - José Gusmão)
Association agreements for the participation of third countries in Union programmes (B9-0096/2024)
I abstained on this resolution. There are positive elements around asserting the role of Parliament with regard to the participation of third countries.However, the intention of the resolution has unfortunately been undermined by the inclusion of a whole uncritical chapter on the New Zealand Free Trade Agreement.
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 13th WTO Ministerial Conference in Abu Dhabi, 26-29 February 2024 (B9-0090/2024)
Russiagate: allegations of Russian interference in the democratic processes of the European Union (RC-B9-0124/2024)
I have consistently voted in favour of sanctions on Russia and supported the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine. I take the issue of Russian interference in democratic processes very seriously, as well as interference by other countries and companies.I am particularly concerned by clear Russian links to right-wing parties and movements. This resolution was a shameless attempt to bypass due process, settle political scores on a range of unrelated issues, and cast innuendo on political opponents. Unfortunately, there are many opportunists in the EP who use the unjustifiable Russian invasion of Ukraine to push other agendas, quite often to promote militarisation of the EU, align the EU with NATO, and undermine the neutrality of countries such as Ireland.Equally unfortunately, some Irish MEPs seem to support such agendas. In this case the resolution blatantly links the legitimate demand for Catalan independence with Russian interference. The EP needs to strengthen its procedures for dealing with interference by non-EU countries, as well as major companies. Some countries and companies have excessive influence over the EP. Unfortunately, this resolution does a disservice to democracy in the EU. It became a cynical exercise in attacking the Catalan independence movement, making it impossible to support. For these reasons, I abstained.
Further repression against the democratic forces in Venezuela: attacks on presidential candidate Maria Corina Machado (RC-B9-0097/2024)
Establishing the Ukraine Facility (A9-0286/2023 - Michael Gahler, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
Establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (‘STEP’) (A9-0290/2023 - José Manuel Fernandes, Christian Ehler)
I voted against the trilogue outcome on the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP).It is a funding instrument intended as a response to the US Inflation Reduction Act. It aims to support the development of ‘critical technologies’ that contribute to the EU’s goals while reducing dependency on external suppliers. Critical technologies can be digital technologies, ‘clean’ technologies and biotechnology. However, this includes security and defence technologies, and, and little requirements to respect the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle.Sinn Féin is opposed to the use of EU funding for military purposes, and for the unfettered diversion of public monies to private companies without adequate conditions attached.
Protection of journalists and human rights defenders from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings (A9-0223/2023 - Tiemo Wölken)
I voted in favour of this report, the main objective of which is to provide protection for victims of cross-border SLAPPs (i.e. against the same person or entity in various Member States and jurisdictions).The main improvement is the possibility for the defendant to request the early dismissal of a case.Importantly it doesn’t prevent public figures from protecting their reputation against abusive attacks by hostile media.
Certain aspects of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (A9-0344/2023 - Jonás Fernández)
Nature restoration (A9-0220/2023 - César Luena)
I opposed the provisional agreement due to insufficient commitments for genuine nature restoration, vital for addressing global biodiversity and climate crises. Sinn Féin’s concerns, raised last year, remain unaddressed, particularly the lack of concrete, long-term funding for nature restoration. The agreement merely references a future Commission report on funding gaps and possible future budget considerations, falling short of expectations.Additionally, it unfairly burdens small, non-intensive farmers in Ireland’s west and northwest, who already adhere to the Habitats Directive in Natura 2000 areas, with the primary responsibility for restoration measures through 2030. These farmers, already compliant with existing nature legislation, are thus expected to contribute more, while those most responsible for biodiversity and climate degradation are not adequately targeted. This approach is fundamentally flawed, letting major culprits off the hook and placing undue pressure on farmers actively contributing to environmental conservation.
Transparency and targeting of political advertising (A9-0009/2023 - Sandro Gozi)
Amending Decision (EU) 2017/1324: continuation of the Union’s participation in PRIMA under Horizon Europe (A9-0378/2023 - Paolo Borchia)
I voted against this report. The main aim of the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) is to build research and innovation capacities and to develop knowledge and common innovative solutions for agri-food systems, to make them sustainable, and for integrated water provision and management in the Mediterranean area.Unfortunately, this revision to the programme is very focused on public-private partnerships and introduces migration issues to the programme. I also believe that Israel should be excluded from the programme until it complies with international law.
Protection of the environment through criminal law (A9-0087/2023 - Antonius Manders)
I supported this proposed directive, which establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions to protect the environment more effectively. The new rules provide an updated list of acts related to the environment that qualify as criminal offences at EU level and of the related sanctions, to ensure a more effective enforcement of EU environmental legislation.
European Central Bank – annual report 2023 (A9-0412/2023 - Johan Van Overtveldt)
Standard essential patents (A9-0016/2024 - Marion Walsmann)
The Commission published its proposal for a regulation on standard essential patents (SEPs). SEPs are patents that protect technology that has been declared essential to the realisation of a technical standard or specification developed by a standard development organisation (SDO).I supported this proposal which, among other things, calls for cooperation with national and international patent officers and authorities of third countries dealing with SEPs to get information about the SEP-related rules outside the EU.
Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products (A9-0173/2023 - Paolo De Castro)
I voted in favour of this file, which is the outcome of trilogue negotiations on geographical indications (GIs) for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products.It is an update of the current regulation on geographical indications. The most important gains are following: it simplifies registration procedures for GIs and strengthens the role of producer groups and recognised producer groups.Overall, GI schemes are very important for the rural communities, with the objective of supporting small farmers and specific supply chains.
Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding Taxes (A9-0007/2024 - Herbert Dorfmann)
Reporting requirements (A9-0009/2024 - Anna Cavazzini)
I supported this technical report concerning reporting requirements. The proposal aims to update reporting requirements in the following areas.Common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products: a reporting obligation introduced to prevent marketing of fish under a certain degree of freshness and size grades will be deleted, as food safety is now covered by general food law. Therefore, these reporting requirements are no longer needed.Approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles: Member States at the moment have to inform the Commission of type approval procedures and individual vehicle approvals. The Commission then has to share this information with the European Parliament and the Council. A study showed that procedures in Member States are satisfactory and sufficient, and the collection and sharing of all this data is unnecessary.
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2023 (A9-0403/2023 - Sven Mikser)
Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2023 (A9-0424/2023 - Nacho Sánchez Amor)
I abstained on this resolution. Whilst I support the promotion of human rights and democracy in the world and the positive elements in the report on migrants and refugees, women and LGBTQI rights and tackling the climate crisis, there were red lines in this report that entailed getting rid of Ireland’s veto in the Council on certain decision-making areas by replacing unanimity in Council with qualified majority voting, which Sinn Féin does not support in any context as the veto is an important tool for Ireland to protect itself against the interests of larger Member States that may be detrimental for the Irish public.
Financial activities of the European Investment Bank - annual report 2023 (A9-0031/2024 - David Cormand)
Report on the Commission’s 2023 Rule of Law report (A9-0025/2024 - Sophia in 't Veld)
I voted in favour of this report emphasising the enforcement of EU law, the fight against corruption and the need for independent authorities to have sufficiently broad mandates, independence, integrity and adequate funding. It also urges the Commission to establish a strategy providing for minimum standards for the protection of civil society organisations in order to provide them with sustainable and non-discriminatory access to resources. Importantly, it urges the Commission to meet its responsibility for the enforcement of EU human rights law and not to rely only on citizens going to court themselves. I particularly welcome the strong chapter on equality, non-discrimination and pluralism, and a strong criticism of the use of excessive force by law enforcement authorities.
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the EEAS on the situation in Syria (A9-0041/2024 - Nathalie Loiseau)
I voted in favour of this resolution. Whilst it is western-centric in its perspective, it is nonetheless important to challenge the human rights abuses committed by the Assad regime, but it is also important to note that Syria is also a geopolitical theatre with competing interests from states at play.Nevertheless, the report makes good recommendations on the need for humanitarian aid and the refugee issue, and in denouncing Turkey’s military actions, establishing a European fund for victims of serious violations of international law in Syria and increasing humanitarian assistance to the 15.3 million Syrians.
Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union of the one part, and Republic of Kenya, Member of the East African Community of the other Part (A9-0012/2024 - Alessandra Mussolini)
The EU-Kenya EPA contains provisions on trade in goods, customs and trade facilitation, technical barriers to trade, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, agriculture and fisheries, development cooperation, dispute avoidance and settlement, and a trade and sustainable development (TSD) annex.I voted against this consent procedure given that it has been fast tracked and did not have an accompanying resolution.
Conclusion of an Agreement between the European union and the Republic of Seychelles on access for Seychelles fishing vessels to the waters of Mayotte (A9-0043/2024 - Gabriel Mato)
Data collection and sharing relating to short-term accommodation rental services (A9-0270/2023 - Kim Van Sparrentak)
I supported these technical proposals as they support at a high level the collection of data to empower local and national actors to make better policy regarding the regulation of short-term lets.Housing remains a national competency, and it is there that better policy-making and action is required.
Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Chile (A9-0011/2024 - Samira Rafaela)
I opposed the updated agreement finalised before President Boric’s term, originally negotiated under President Piñera’s right-wing neoliberal administration, aiming to cut tariffs and expand liberalisation in trade between the EU and Chile. Despite Boric’s renegotiation attempts, the European Commission kept the deal aligned with priorities of securing EU’s supply of critical raw materials like lithium, essential for its green and digital transition, with Chile being a major supplier. While the agreement includes provisions for sustainable development, gender equality, and sustainable food systems, it restricts Chile’s control over its critical resources and could undermine democratically elected governments through its investment protection clause. It favours large agribusiness, potentially harming small-scale farmers, and raises concerns over environmental protection, indigenous rights, access to medicines and digital rights, highlighting significant drawbacks in its current form.
EU/Chile Advanced Framework Agreement (A9-0010/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela)
I opposed the updated agreement finalised before President Boric’s term, originally negotiated under President Piñera’s right-wing neoliberal administration, aiming to cut tariffs and expand liberalisation in trade between the EU and Chile. Despite Boric’s renegotiation attempts, the European Commission kept the deal aligned with priorities of securing EU’s supply of critical raw materials like lithium, essential for its green and digital transition, with Chile being a major supplier. While the agreement includes provisions for sustainable development, gender equality and sustainable food systems, it restricts Chile’s control over its critical resources and could undermine democratically elected governments through its investment protection clause. It favours large agribusiness, potentially harming small-scale farmers, and raises concerns over environmental protection, indigenous rights, access to medicines and digital rights, highlighting significant drawbacks in its current form.
EU/Chile Advanced Framework Agreement (Resolution) (A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela)
I opposed the updated agreement finalised before President Boric’s term, originally negotiated under President Piñera’s right-wing neoliberal administration, aiming to cut tariffs and expand liberalisation in trade between the EU and Chile. Despite Boric’s renegotiation attempts, the European Commission kept the deal aligned with priorities of securing EU’s supply of critical raw materials like lithium, essential for its green and digital transition, with Chile being a major supplier. While the agreement includes provisions for sustainable development, gender equality and sustainable food systems, it restricts Chile’s control over its critical resources and could undermine democratically elected governments through its investment protection clause. It favours large agribusiness, potentially harming small-scale farmers, and raises concerns over environmental protection, indigenous rights, access to medicines and digital rights, highlighting significant drawbacks in its current form.
Improving the Union’s protection against market manipulation on the wholesale energy market (A9-0261/2023 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
European Digital Identity framework (A9-0038/2023 - Romana Jerković)
I supported this framework for a European digital identity available to all EU citizens, residents, and businesses in the EU. It will facilitate access to online services, recognised throughout the EU, including by large online platforms, at the request of the user.Importantly, people are not obliged to sign up to the digital identity.
The murder of Alexei Navalny and the need for EU action in support of political prisoners and oppressed civil society in Russia (RC-B9-0147/2024)
I voted in favour of this resolution in solidarity with Navalny, his family and all human rights defenders, anti-war and democratic activists being oppressed by the Russian Government. However, I do not agree with any language that implies the creation of a military alliance under the false pretence of defence that involves Ireland and breaching our military neutrality, or Irish taxpayers’ money being used to subsidise an EU military-industrial complex.
The need for unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after two years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine (RC-B9-0143/2024)
I voted in favour of this resolution in solidarity with the Ukrainian people resisting Russia’s illegal invasion and occupation of Ukraine. However, I do not agree with any language that implies the creation of a military alliance under the false pretence of defence that involves Ireland and breaches our military neutrality, or with Irish taxpayers’ money being used to subsidise an EU military-industrial complex.
Implementation of the EU-Southern African Development Community (SADC) Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) (A9-0024/2024 - Joachim Schuster)
I voted in favour of this file. The report emphasises the importance of the involvement of civil society in the implementation and monitoring of the EPA, regrets the current absence of involvement and calls for the establishment of formal Domestic Advisory Groups to involve civil society. It also makes recommendations for an improved cooperation for the benefit of the SADC region, and calls for increased European investment, including through Global Gateway, in the region to support the green transition and the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.The text also underlines the importance of involving local companies wherever possible in the implementation process to keep invested funds in the region, boost employment and facilitate the transfer of skills. It also stresses the urgent need to undertake far-reaching joint efforts towards decarbonisation and to support this with substantial funding, as well as to carry out far-reaching technology transfers.Finally, it emphasises the significance of joint collaboration in promoting sustainable development and combating climate change.
Critical situation in Cuba (RC-B9-0144/2024, B9-0144/2024, B9-0145/2024, B9-0148/2024, B9-0151/2024)
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Union list of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest (B9-0161/2024)
Industrial Emissions Directive (A9-0216/2023 - Radan Kanev)
I voted in favour of this file, which seeks to control air and water pollution by means of a permit-granting procedure for industrial and agricultural activities. I welcome the additions that will reduce the administrative burden on farmers who will register under the IED process. The directive both acknowledges the need to monitor pollution from the biggest farms, without placing undue burden on smaller and medium-sized farms.
Industrial Emissions Portal (A9-0211/2023 - Radan Kanev)
I supported this file, which establishes a reporting database for information produced in relation to the Industrial Emissions Directive. I am glad that this database will be available free of charge to all users. It is important that the public have access to data reporting on environmental issues; this portal is an important method of measuring the efficacy of the IED.
Definition of criminal offences and penalties for the violation of Union restrictive measures (A9-0235/2023 - Sophia in 't Veld)
I voted against this poorly drafted directive, which:– risks the issuance of excessive fines against humanitarian operators with limited resources leading to an adverse impact on the lives of those they support; and– may have the effect of criminalising public servants/workers across a range of sectors.I would welcome better enforcement of sanctions on Russia, but do not agree that this should become a generalised system relating to the enforcement of geo-strategic EU/NATO priorities.
Weights and dimensions of certain road vehicles (A9-0047/2024 - Isabel García Muñoz)
This proposal’s main objectives are to remove barriers and provide stronger incentives for the uptake of zero-emission technologies and energy-saving devices in the HDV sector.Whilst I recognise the importance of the proposal, the practical ramifications for Ireland are still somewhat unknown. Therefore, I abstained.
Use of railway infrastructure capacity in the single European railway area, amending Directive 2012/34/EU and repealing Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 (A9-0069/2024 - Tilly Metz)
Energy performance of buildings (recast) (A9-0033/2023 - Ciarán Cuffe)
I was happy to support this directive, which aims to accelerate the decarbonisation of the EU. This will benefit people living in poor energy performing buildings due to the old age of the building or disrepair, who are more likely to experience energy poverty as a result.Renovating poor energy performing buildings can improve the physical and mental health of those living in them. Renovation of buildings also provides an opportunity for employment and reskilling. Retention post-trilogue of district renovation programmes will mean that the most vulnerable people can be reached.
Horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 (A9-0253/2023 - Nicola Danti)
Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive) (A9-0056/2024 - Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip)
I supported this directive, which aims to protect consumers from greenwashing. Irish consumers want to spend their money on products that are good for the environment. Unfortunately, many companies are taking advantage of that, making false environmental claims in order to boost their sales. Companies will no longer be able to get away with greenwashing; instead, clear criteria have been established for proving environmental claims and labels. It is important that Irish consumers can be assured that they are not being misled when buying a product. Companies must live up to their green credentials, or cease claim to them.
Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 as regards the digital labelling of EU fertilising products (A9-0330/2023 - Maria Grapini)
European Maritime Safety Agency and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 (A9-0423/2023 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
I voted in favour. EMSA’s remit is mostly to provide Member States and the Commission with the technical and scientific assistance needed in the field of maritime safety, prevention of pollution by ships, search and rescue, maritime accident investigation, and to assess if seafarers’ rights and working and living conditions on board ships are respected.
Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention, 2019 (No. 190) of the International Labour Organization (A9-0040/2024 - Cindy Franssen, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen)
Extending Rule 168 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure until the end of the 10th parliamentary term (B9-0159/2024)
I voted against the reintroduction of the derogation on the use of Irish in the EU. The reason for the lack of sufficient translators and interpreters is shared by the EU and the Irish Government. I would encourage the EU and the Irish Government to take a more strategic approach to ensuring that this derogation can be removed again in the near future.
Artificial Intelligence Act (A9-0188/2023 - Brando Benifei, Dragoş Tudorache)
Amending the Directive on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes (A9-0060/2024 - Laura Ballarín Cereza)
I supported this file, which updates the existing alternative dispute resolution legislation to create better protection for consumers who have a complaint after a purchase. It is important that consumers are better informed of their rights to access dispute resolution processes. This file is a step in the right direction to improving accessibility and effectiveness.
Discontinuation of the European ODR Platform (A9-0058/2024 - Laura Ballarín Cereza)
Asset recovery and confiscation (A9-0199/2023 - Loránt Vincze)
I supported this Directive creating an EU framework for the freezing and confiscation of assets that have been obtained illegally through criminal acts.I support the decision of the Dublin government not to opt in and am comfortable that the EU system will not undermine the current system in Ireland.
Use of the Internal Market Information System and the Single Digital Gateway for the purposes of certain requirements laid down by the Directive on European cross-border associations (A9-0006/2024 - Anne-Sophie Pelletier)
Compulsory licensing for crisis management and amending Regulation (EC) 816/2006 (A9-0042/2024 - Adrián Vázquez Lázara)
I voted in favour of this proposal, which aims to create a regulatory framework for the compulsory licensing of patented crisis-relevant products with EU-wide territorial scope. The proposal would waive patents for crisis-relevant products, something I advocated for with a TRIPS Waiver for COVID-19 vaccines.
Safety of toys and repealing Directive 2009/48/EC (A9-0044/2024 - Marion Walsmann)
Amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (A9-0055/2024 - Anna Zalewska)
Whilst I supported this file, which sets out targets for the reduction in food waste, I do not think the proposal laid out before Parliament was ambitious enough. Nearly 59 million tonnes of food are wasted in the EU each year. We need to be more ambitious when it comes to preventing food waste in processing and manufacturing, at retail and consumption.
A single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State (recast) (A9-0140/2023 - Javier Moreno Sánchez)
I voted in favour of this procedure, which will contribute to ensuring equal treatment between third-country workers and nationals of the permit-issuing Member State.This contributes to a sustainable EU legal migration policy, attracting talent to our labour markets and creating safe channels to reach Europe.
European cross-border associations (A9-0062/2024 - Sergey Lagodinsky)
I supported this proposal, which seeks to introduce an additional legal form of a European cross-border association (ECBA) in Member States’ national legal systems that is specifically designed for cross-border purposes and will reduce legal and administrative burdens when it comes to the recognition and establishment of non-profit associations engaging in activities in another Member State.
Minimum requirements on minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods in the occasional passenger transport sector (A9-0370/2023 - Henna Virkkunen)
I supported this report on the minimum breaks for coach drivers. Among other things, the report called for the EU and Member States to promote cooperation with and between social partners and enforcement authorities, with the objective to contribute to the proper implementation of the provisions of this regulation, including developing guidelines and issuing recommendations.
Establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (A9-0065/2024 - Deirdre Clune)
I supported this proposal, which aims to centralise the customs process in the EU and make it more efficient, through creating an EU Customs Authority and EU Customs Data Hub. More inter-institutional dialogue will be required, however, to ensure that this can be implemented smoothly across the island of Ireland.
Type-approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) (A9-0298/2023 - Alexandr Vondra)
The stated aim of Euro 7 was to reduce emissions from motor vehicles and engines. I could not support this proposal, as I felt it was significantly lacking ambition. There has not been sufficient progress made since Euro 6 was agreed 15 years ago. If we are going to tackle the climate crisis, we need to be as ambitious as possible.
Temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Moldovan products under the EU/Euratom/Moldova Association Agreement (A9-0079/2024 - Markéta Gregorová)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2024 (A9-0050/2024 - Dragoş Pîslaru)
Guidelines for the 2025 Budget - Section III (A9-0068/2024 - Victor Negrescu)
Closer ties between the EU and Armenia and the need for a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia (RC-B9-0163/2024)
I voted in favour, as it is important to build a lasting peace, diplomacy and dialogue between Armenia and Azerbaijan. However, as Ireland is a militarily neutral state, I did not support the following elements in the resolution that referred to military cooperation, particularly in the context of wider geopolitical issues.
Subscription by the Union to additional shares in the capital of the EBRD and amendment of the Agreement establishing the EBRD (C9-0009/2024) (vote)
Financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (recast) (A9-0180/2023 - Monika Hohlmeier, Nils Ušakovs)
Protocol amending the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership (A9-0081/2024 - Danilo Oscar Lancini)
Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Albania on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Albania (A9-0036/2024 - Lena Düpont)
Cohesion policy 2014-2020 – implementation and outcomes in the Member States (A9-0049/2024 - Andrey Novakov)
The adoption of the Special Measure in favour of Tunisia for 2023 (B9-0173/2024)
I supported this resolution as it raises serious question marks over the manner that the Commission disbursed millions to the Tunisian government. The granting of such funding urgently without any oversight or scrutiny from Parliament, given the significant and worsening situation in Tunisia, authoritarian reversal and an alarming backslide on democracy, human rights and the rule of law, raises should be criticised.
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure implementing the parliamentary reform “Parliament 2024” (A9-0158/2024 - Salvatore De Meo)
Addressing situations of crisis and force majeure (A9-0127/2023 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I opposed this file as Ireland should not opt in. The provisions and rules contained within it are best set at national level.It should be for an Irish government to decide if we are facing an emergency situation in our asylum system that requires us to change our procedures and the EU should not be allowed to block such a declaration and associated actions.
Establishment of 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, for identifying an illegally staying third-country national or stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States' law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes (recast) (A8-0212/2017 - Jorge Buxadé Villalba)
Union Resettlement Framework (A8-0316/2017 - Malin Björk)
I opposed this file as Ireland should not opt in. The provisions and rules contained within it are best set at national level. I recognise the progressive work carried out by the rapporteur and that Ireland should, in consideration of our capacities, continue to engage in resettlement work as decided at national level.
Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast) (A8-0186/2017 - Sophia in 't Veld)
New Regulation on Construction Products (A9-0207/2023 - Christian Doleschal)
Amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards the time limits for the adoption of sustainability reporting standards for certain sectors and for certain third-country undertakings (A9-0013/2024 - Axel Voss)
Methane emissions reduction in the energy sector (A9-0162/2023 - Pascal Canfin, Jutta Paulus)
I supported this proposal, which is a part of the Green Deal and attempts to manage methane emissions from the energy sector. This is an important piece of legislation to tackle the fossil fuel industry head on, stopping them from leaking methane emissions through monitoring and repairing. It is significant that importers of fossil fuels are subject to the same requirements as EU producers, given 80 % of fossil fuels used in the EU are imported.
Mercury: dental amalgam and other mercury-added products subject to manufacturing, import and export restrictions (A9-0002/2024 - Marlene Mortler)
It has been accepted that mercury is dangerous to human health and the environment. This proposal will ban the use and export of dental amalgam, which is the last remaining substantive use of mercury, by 2025. This proposal improves on the Irish Government’s ambition of a phase-out of the use of dental amalgam by 2030. I will follow how this is implemented in Ireland closely, to ensure that patients receiving free dental care are not adversely impacted by this ban.
Strengthening the CO2 emission performance targets for new heavy-duty vehicles (A9-0313/2023 - Bas Eickhout)
I supported this proposal, which aims to contribute to the target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from 2030-2034 by 45 %, from 2035-2039 by 65 % and from 2040 onwards by 90 %. This is important: greenhouse gas emissions from the road transport sector are on the rise, despite an overall downward trend in EU emissions.
Foodstuffs for human consumption: amending certain 'Breakfast' Directives (A9-0385/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber)
I supported this directive, which will implement new requirements and product definitions to reduce the frequency of honey fraud. We have a wealth of high-quality, local Irish produce including honeys and jams. This measure will ensure that Irish consumers can be assured that the products they are buying, when listed as Irish, have indeed been produced in Ireland.
European environmental economic accounts: new modules (A9-0296/2023 - Pascal Canfin)
I supported this proposal, which attempts to provide better statistical information relating to the Green Deal by adding new statistical areas under the remit of reporting requirements, including forest accounts, ecosystem accounts, and environmental subsidies. The more environmental statistics in areas like forestry and ecosystems that are collected in a uniform way across the EU, the better informed EU environmental policy decisions will be.
Union certification framework for carbon removals (A9-0329/2023 - Lídia Pereira)
I abstained on this measure. Whilst it is positive that a pathway has been provided through which farmers can earn additional income, the lack of retroactive application means that farmers who have already been engaged in this work will miss out and, ultimately, the weak regulation of the use of the certificates opens the door too broadly for private companies to pursue greenwashing practices.
Standards for equality bodies in the field of equal treatment and equal opportunities between women and men in matters of employment and occupation (A9-0354/2023 - Sirpa Pietikäinen, Marc Angel)
I voted in favour of this proposal to set binding standards for equality bodies in Member States to improve their respective equality bodies’ independence and effectiveness, in particular in terms of their capacity to ensure that any individuals and groups that are discriminated against can fully enjoy their rights.
Council Directive on standards for equality bodies in the field of equal treatment between persons irrespective of their racial or ethnic origin, equal treatment in matters of employment and occupation between persons irrespective of their religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, equal treatment between women and men in matters of social security and in the access to and supply of goods and services, and amending Directives 2000/43/EC and 2004/113/EC (A9-0128/2024 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
I voted in favour of this proposal to set binding standards for equality bodies in Member States to improve their respective equality bodies’ independence and effectiveness, in particular in terms of their capacity to ensure that any individuals and groups that are discriminated against can fully enjoy their rights.
Conservation, management and control measures applicable in the area covered by the NEAFC Convention (A9-0004/2024 - Francisco Guerreiro)
Amending Directive 2009/18/EC establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector (A9-0422/2023 - Caroline Nagtegaal)
I supported this proposal on the Marine Accident Investigation Directive, which sets out the principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector. The proposed amending directive looks at identifying means to support Member States by making use of the European Maritime Safety Agency.
Amending Directive 2005/35/EC on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of penalties for infringements (A9-0365/2023 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
Amending Directive 2009/21/EC on compliance with flag State requirements (A9-0418/2023 - Vera Tax)
Soil Monitoring and Resilience (Soil Monitoring Directive) (A9-0138/2024 - Martin Hojsík)
Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Members of the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (A9-0147/2024 - Tomas Tobé)
Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Members of the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (Resolution) (A9-0159/2024 - Tomas Tobé)
EU/Côte d’Ivoire Voluntary Partnership Agreement: forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and timber products to the EU (A9-0136/2024 - Karin Karlsbro)
I voted in favour of this file as the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the EU and Côte d’Ivoire combats illegal logging and promotes sustainable forest management by establishing a framework that includes a licensing scheme for timber, transparent and inclusive forest governance, and international cooperation in environmental conservation.
EU/Côte d’Ivoire Voluntary Partnership Agreement: forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and timber products to the EU (Resolution) (A9-0137/2024 - Karin Karlsbro)
I voted in favour of this file as the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the EU and Côte d’Ivoire combats illegal logging and promotes sustainable forest management by establishing a framework that includes a licensing scheme for timber, transparent and inclusive forest governance, and international cooperation in environmental conservation.
Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0078/2024 - Marco Campomenosi)
Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Argentine Republic amending the Agreement of the European Union and the Argentine Republic pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (A9-0083/2024 - Jordi Cañas)
Agreement between the European Union and Iceland on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for border management and visa policy, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund (A9-0146/2024 - Malik Azmani)
Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for border management and visa policy, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund (A9-0143/2024 - Charlie Weimers)
Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for border management and visa policy, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund (A9-0145/2024 - Jadwiga Wiśniewska)
Conclusion of an Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, on cooperation between the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and the competent authorities for judicial cooperation in criminal matters of the Republic of Armenia (A9-0165/2024 - Thijs Reuten)
Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for border management and visa policy, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund (A9-0144/2024 - Paulo Rangel)
Establishing a Head Office Tax system for micro, small and medium sized enterprises, and amending Directive 2011/16/EU (A9-0064/2024 - Lídia Pereira)
Union code relating to medicinal products for human use (A9-0140/2024 - Pernille Weiss)
Union procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human use and rules governing the European Medicines Agency (A9-0141/2024 - Tiemo Wölken)
Urban wastewater treatment (A9-0276/2023 - Nils Torvalds)
I supported this revision of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive, which sets out requirements for Member States to ensure better collection and treatment of urban wastewater according to minimum standards. The approach taken in this proposal is novel and welcomed; it places an onus on those who pollute to fit the bill for their polluting contributions. I welcome this, and hope that the outcome will lead to significant improvements in water quality.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Specific hygiene requirements for certain meat, fishery products, dairy products and eggs (B9-0211/2024)
Discharge 2022: EU general budget - Commission (A9-0139/2024 - Isabel García Muñoz)
Discharge 2022: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (A9-0113/2024 - Petri Sarvamaa)
I voted against the discharge, as FRONTEX is the agency with the highest number of observations from the Court on different issues such as procurement, HR issues, management and control systems, budget management and reliability of accounts. Additionally, due to OLAF investigations closed in February 2022 that revealed serious misconduct and mismanagement.I supported the resolution itself that highlights the issues with the OLAF investigations into FRONTEX and human rights violations by the agency.
Discharge 2022: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy) (A9-0090/2024 - Michal Wiezik)
Discharge 2022: Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking (A9-0093/2024 - Michal Wiezik)
Union’s electricity market design: Regulation (A9-0255/2023 - Nicolás González Casares)
This proposal attempts to change the current design of the electricity market. Unfortunately, the market-based approach taken to this proposal meant that I could not support it. Instead of benefiting ordinary households vulnerable to energy poverty, the changes introduced will primarily benefit large energy producers and large consumers.It is wrong to view energy solely as a commodity, and not as a public good. I welcome that the proposal introduces measures around preventing disconnection of vulnerable people, however I believe this was a missed opportunity. The language remains weak and connections remain possible.
Union’s electricity market design: Directive (A9-0151/2024 - Nicolás González Casares)
This proposal attempts to change the current design of the electricity market. Unfortunately, the market-based approach taken to this proposal meant that I could not support it. Instead of benefiting ordinary households vulnerable to energy poverty, the changes introduced will primarily benefit large energy producers and large consumers.It is wrong to view energy solely as a commodity, and not as a public good. I welcome that the proposal introduces measures around preventing disconnection of vulnerable people, however I believe this was a missed opportunity. The language remains weak and connections remain possible.
Inclusion of the right to abortion in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (B9-0205/2024, B9-0207/2024, B9-0208/2024)
Recommendation for a decision not to oppose a delegated act: rules on the ratio for GAEC Standard 1 (B9-0199/2024, B9-0220/2024)
I supported the non-objection to add limited flexibilities for Member States for GAEC 1 in order to support small farmers facing structural changes in agriculture. The flexibilities provided in GAEC 1 through the delegated act amendment are reasonable because this amendment to the delegated act provides options for Ireland to better target reconversion obligations.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Deleting Gibraltar from the table in Point I of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 (B9-0210/2024, B9-0222/2024)
I supported this objection on the Commission’s ‘grey list’ of non-EU countries whose legal framework is considered to present a high risk in terms of money laundering and terrorist financing (in principle, financial secrecy jurisdictions). Notably, the update removes the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Panama and Gibraltar from the high-risk third country list. The objection noted important and recent evidence suggesting that the UAE, Gibraltar and Panama lack efforts in addressing, or even facilitate the evasion of, sanctions imposed on Russia. Therefore I supported the objection to remove them from the list.
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Commission delegated regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 as regards the amount of the visa fees (B9-0216/2024)
I abstained on this objection regarding visa fees. The objection concerns the increase of visa fees. A single applicant will now have to pay a visa fee of EUR 90. Children from the age of six years and below the age of 12 years shall pay a visa fee of EUR 45 (Presently the cost is EUR 80 and EUR 40).
Objection pursuant to Rule 111(3): Feedstock for the production of biofuels and biogas (B9-0218/2024)
I supported this file to support circularity. The act’s provisions to include crops like catch crops and those from severely damaged land into the feedstock list aim to optimise underutilised resources that could otherwise be discarded. Initiatives like this could help farmers play a role in decarbonising the EU, additionally this could also help sectors transition from carbon fuels to biofuel and biogas with increased availability of feedstock. The environmental concerns should be addressed by the directive’s sustainability protocols.
Measures to reduce the cost of deploying gigabit electronic communications networks (Gigabit Infrastructure Act) (A9-0275/2023 - Alin Mituța)
The transfer of proceedings in criminal matters (A9-0008/2024 - Assita Kanko)
I voted in favour of this report on rules to regulate the conditions under which criminal proceedings initiated in one member state may be transferred to another, ensuring that the best-placed country investigates or prosecutes a criminal offence and preventing unnecessary parallel proceedings (of the same suspect) in different Member States. This will contribute to the fight against cross-border crime.
Establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of insurance and reinsurance undertakings (A9-0251/2023 - Markus Ferber)
Amendments to the Solvency II Directive (A9-0256/2023 - Markus Ferber)
I rejected this review of the insurance regulation Solvency II. Sensible proposals from EIOPA were hijacked by the CMU agenda and the Commission and in turn the rapporteur really took advantage proposing massive capital relief for insurers.Despite some improvements on sustainability the overall agreement is not one I can support.
Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (A9-0271/2023 - Maria Spyraki)
I supported this measure, which will ensure that hazardous chemicals are classified adequately and uniformly across the EU. I hope this will lead to a reduction in the exposure of both citizens and the environment to harmful chemical substances, and that consumers will be better informed of the hazards of chemicals in products. It is also important that we place restrictions on chemical companies who are engaging in greenwashing practices.
Payment services in the internal market and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (A9-0052/2024 - Marek Belka)
Combating late payment in commercial transactions (A9-0156/2024 - Róża Thun und Hohenstein)
I abstained on this report. Whilst we fully recognise the importance of prompt payments for business, we fear the negative impact this could have on Irish businesses, given that the majority of enterprises in Ireland are small or micro-sized.There is a fear that implementing a blunt 30-day payment requirement for them is likely to impact badly on their liquidity and could require them to seek additional debt funding in order to meet the deadline. The cost of that could be passed on to consumers, who often include other small and micro-enterprises.Regarding public bodies, Ireland already imposes a 15-calendar day payment period on government ministries and other public bodies.
Regulation on import, export and transit measures for firearms, their essential components and ammunition(recast) (A9-0312/2023 - Bernd Lange)
I supported this file, as it aims to tackle the illicit production, import, export and transit of firearms and their components through an effective export authorisation and licensing system. It also aims to improve cooperation between law enforcement authorities (including customs) and licensing authorities, both for imports and exports, in order to improve the traceability of firearms, their parts and ammunition.Rural traditions were also protected, as hunters, exhibitors or people using firearms for sporting purposes or historical re-enactments in the EU will not need an import or export authorisation if they hold a European Firearms Pass.
Ecodesign Regulation (A9-0218/2023 - Alessandra Moretti)
I supported this regulation, which sets certain eco-requirements for new products and goods, including requirements surrounding durability, reusability, upgradability, energy efficiency and increased recycled content.Consumers across the EU want good-quality products that will last the test of time and that will not decrease their environmental footprint as compared to existing products.I was particularly happy to see a new requirement for companies to cease destruction of unsold textiles and footwear. We must do more to reduce waste.
Temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products under the EU/Euratom/Ukraine Association Agreement (A9-0077/2024 - Sandra Kalniete)
Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement: participation of Egypt in Union programmes (A9-0175/2024 - Michael Gahler)
Preventing plastic pellet losses to reduce microplastic pollution (A9-0148/2024 - João Albuquerque)
I was happy to support this measure, which will place much-needed requirements on operators to prevent plastic pellets being released into the environment during the production, processing, transport and waste management of plastic products. Microplastics are having a devastating impact on our oceans and sea life; it is crucial that we properly regulate their use and target funding into projects to clean up areas impacted by pellet losses.
Prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market (A9-0306/2023 - Samira Rafaela, Maria-Manuel Leitão-Marques)
I strongly supported this as it provides a more comprehensive legal framework to limiting the entry of forced labour products into the EU market. Although it falls short in some areas, such as full remediation for victims, its adoption is a step in the right direction towards ethical trade practices that respect human rights and eradicating forced labour. The finalised agreement improves upon the original by lowering the threshold for initiating investigations, involving civil society and trade unions in the investigation process, and providing whistle-blower protection.
Amending Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims (A9-0285/2023 - Malin Björk, Eugenia Rodríguez Palop)
Effective coordination of economic policies and multilateral budgetary surveillance (A9-0439/2023 - Markus Ferber, Margarida Marques)
Speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure – amending Regulation (A9-0444/2023 - Markus Ferber, Margarida Marques)
Requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States – amending Directive (A9-0440/2023 - Markus Ferber, Margarida Marques)
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure concerning the training on preventing conflict and harassment in the workplace and on good office management (A9-0163/2024 - Gabriele Bischoff)
Objections pursuant to Rule 111(3): Novel foods - the definition of ‘engineered nanomaterials’ (B9-0225/2024) (vote)
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Calculation, verification and reporting of data on recycled plastic content in single-use plastic beverage bottles (B9-0226/2024)
Trans-European transport network (A9-0147/2023 - Barbara Thaler, Dominique Riquet)
I supported this revised regulation, which sets the technical standards and future development requirements for specific EU transport corridors (road, rail, sea, and inland waterway) and specific categories of transport facilities (airports, ports, freight terminals, and multimodal transport hubs) out to 2050. Whilst I welcome the additions for Ireland, including the addition of Galway and Limerick to the network of urban nodes, I am disappointed that the Claremorris-Collooney section of the Western Rail Corridor has not been added to the TEN-T Network.
Packaging and packaging waste (A9-0319/2023 - Frédérique Ries)
Cross-border exchange of information on road-safety related traffic offences (A9-0396/2023 - Kosma Złotowski)
Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed (A9-0014/2024 - Jessica Polfjärd)
Early intervention measures, conditions for resolution and funding of resolution action (SRMR3) (A9-0155/2024 - Pedro Marques)
I voted against this package which is aimed at extending the current rules around banking resolutions to smaller and medium size banks. These rules were brought in after the banking crash and were aimed at preventing bank bailouts.This is badly-thought-out legislation with some major issues like the DGS scheme would be open to ‘bailing-in’ and, as we see in Germany, this would cause huge problems for already existing schemes.
Early intervention measures, conditions for resolution and financing of resolution action (BRRD3) (A9-0153/2024 - Luděk Niedermayer)
I voted against this package which is aimed at extending the current rules around banking resolution to smaller and medium size banks. These rules were brought in after the banking crash and were aimed at preventing bank bailouts.This is badly-thought-out legislation with some major issues like the DGS scheme would be open to ‘bailing-in’ and, as we see in Germany, this would cause huge problems for already existing schemes.
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (A9-0184/2023 - Lara Wolters)
I supported this important milestone towards improving the global landscape on business and human rights. Whilst the final text is not as strong as we would have liked, I believe that it still constitutes a general improvement compared to the current situation, as all Member States will now have due diligence obligations in their national legislations.
Improving working conditions in platform work (A9-0301/2022 - Elisabetta Gualmini)
European Health Data Space (A9-0395/2023 - Tomislav Sokol, Annalisa Tardino)
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Application EGF/2023/004 DK/Danish Crown - Denmark (A9-0171/2024 - Janusz Lewandowski)
I voted in favour of the EGF Mobilisation. Denmark submitted an application EGF/2023/004 DK/Danish Crown for a financial contribution from the EGF, following displacements in Danish Crown and two suppliers and downstream producers in Denmark. The application relates to 692 workers who have lost their jobs. The Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 1 882 212, representing 60 % of the total costs of the proposed measures, in order to provide a financial contribution for the application.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Application EGF/2023/003 DE/Vallourec - Germany (A9-0166/2024 - Jens Geier)
I supported this EGF Mobilisation. The purpose is to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to support Germany in the face of redundancies in the metal manufacturing sector. The application relates to 1518 laid off workers from Vallourec (Vallourec Deutschland GmbH (VAD)). The Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the amount of EUR 2 984 627, representing 60 % of the total costs of the proposed measures, in order to provide a financial contribution for the application.
Withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty (A9-0176/2024 - Anna Cavazzini, Marc Botenga)
I supported this proposal. It is long-standing Sinn Féin policy to advocate for a withdrawal from the Energy Charter. The Charter is a major barrier to net zero. We must leave this treaty, so that government policy can align its energy policy with the Paris Agreement and our climate targets, without the threat of legal action for compensation from fossil fuel companies.
Measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens of the Union in third countries (A9-0178/2024 - Loránt Vincze)
Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (A9-0177/2024 - Silvia Modig)
I supported this new treaty, which represents a global effort to tangibly promote and implement marine conservation in the high seas and deep seabed in areas beyond national jurisdiction. In addition to its provisions on marine protected areas, the agreement strengthens processes for environmental impact assessments for activities that may impact the marine environment. Further, it sets out arrangements for capacity building measures to assist developing countries in achieving the aims of the agreement. The treaty also contains provisions addressing benefit-sharing relating to marine genetic resources.
European Disability Card and European Parking Card for persons with disabilities (A9-0003/2024 - Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová)
I supported this proposal, which provides for a European Disability Card and updates the rules on the European Parking Card, building on the pilot project for a European Disability Card. The European Disability card will complement national disability cards, which will continue to be awarded by national authorities, based on their own criteria.
European Disability Card and European Parking Card for persons with disabilities for third country nationals legally residing in a Member State (A9-0059/2024 - Antonius Manders, Alice Kuhnke)
I supported this proposal, which provides for a European Disability Card and updates the rules on the European Parking Card, building on the pilot project for a European Disability Card. The European Disability card will complement national disability cards, which will continue to be awarded by national authorities, based on their own criteria.
Production and marketing of plant reproductive material (A9-0149/2024 - Herbert Dorfmann)
I supported this new regulation to streamline laws for plant reproductive material, which includes seeds, cuttings, trees, roots, and tubers used to grow other plants. The new regulation emphasises the importance of registering plant varieties in a national catalogue after verifying their unique characteristics and stability. It also intends to boost the diversity of plant materials available to farmers, including amateurs, by simplifying rules around conservation varieties and allowing more flexibility in seed conservation and exchange, ultimately enhancing agricultural biodiversity.
Production and marketing of forest reproductive material (A9-0142/2024 - Herbert Dorfmann)
I abstained on this new regulation, although I did support the need to track the origins of these materials by requiring that they come from registered ‘parent trees’ and certification to verify and guarantee quality. For me, the addition of eucalyptus to this regulation was a step too far, given that eucalyptus plantations threaten native biodiversity, as they require significant quantities of water ‒ particularly in areas prone to water scarcity, drought and forest fire conditions, whilst degrading land. The flammability of eucalyptus oils and bark also pose a deadly fire risk to other forest material.
Establishing the Reform and Growth Facility for the Western Balkans (A9-0085/2024 - Tonino Picula, Karlo Ressler)
I supported this fund as it is designed to boost the region’s economic development. The positives also include the strengthening of the social dimension by including conditions of fundamental rights, access to healthcare, gender mainstreaming, empowerment of women and girls and respect for the rights of persons belonging to all minorities.
Simplification of certain CAP rules (C9-0120/2024)
I opposed the objection and supported the proposal, as the adjustments focus on changes that are beneficial for farmers in reducing their administrative burden, and flexibilities that allow national administrations to adapt implementation to address farmers’ situations.However, any discussion on payments was not appropriate here given the urgency for council adoption, but I did not oppose amendments that referenced the need to preserve biodiversity and a revision of the CAP to improve ordinary farmer incomes, their position in supply chains, UTPs, stopping Mercosur and improving climate adaptability.
Amendment of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 on protective measures against pests of plants (A9-0035/2024 - Clara Aguilera)
Transparency and integrity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities (A9-0417/2023 - Aurore Lalucq)
Measures to mitigate excessive exposures to third-country central counterparties and improve the efficiency of Union clearing markets (A9-0398/2023 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
Treatment of concentration risk arising from exposures towards central counterparties and of counterparty risk in centrally cleared derivative transactions (A9-0399/2023 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
Increasing the attractiveness of public capital markets and facilitating access to capital for SMEs – amending certain Regulations (A9-0302/2023 - Alfred Sant)
I supported the listing package aimed at allowing SMEs to ‘list’ themselves on the stock exchange, thereby raising more capital and competing with bigger companiesAt the moment, this is apparently a very complicated and prohibitively costly process. The proposal reduces obligations around prospectuses and generally simplifies the process. This is balanced with anti-abuse rules.
Increasing the attractiveness of public capital markets and facilitating access to capital for SMEs – amending Directive (A9-0303/2023 - Alfred Sant)
I supported the listing package aimed at allowing SMEs to ‘list’ themselves on the stock exchange, thereby raising more capital and competing with bigger companiesAt the moment, this is apparently a very complicated and prohibitively costly process. The proposal reduces obligations around prospectuses and generally simplifies the process. This is balanced with anti-abuse rules.
Multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on an SME growth market (A9-0300/2023 - Alfred Sant)
I supported the listing package aimed at allowing SMEs to ‘list’ themselves on the stock exchange, thereby raising more capital and competing with bigger companiesAt the moment, this is apparently a very complicated and prohibitively costly process. The proposal reduces obligations around prospectuses and generally simplifies the process. This is balanced with anti-abuse rules.
Standards of quality and safety for substances of human origin intended for human application (A9-0250/2023 - Nathalie Colin-Oesterlé)
I supported this file, which requires a uniform level of safety and quality standards for substances of human origin (substances that can be donated, e.g. blood). These uniform standards have been developed by ECDC and other expert bodies, allowing for seamless cross-border sharing of donations of this kind.
Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements (A9-0076/2024 - Jonás Fernández)
Surface water and groundwater pollutants (A9-0238/2023 - Milan Brglez)
EuroHPC initiative for start-ups to boost European leadership in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (A9-0161/2024 - Maria da Graça Carvalho)
I support the ambition of this measure in terms of investment and job creation; Ireland requires greater investment in RD&I in order to grow the knowledge intensive sectors of the future. I have significant concerns, however, over Israel’s association with the EuroHPC joint undertaking. The EU must suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement while Israel continues to disrespect international law. I therefore abstained.
Company law - Further expanding an upgrading the use of digital tools and processes (A9-0394/2023 - Emil Radev)
I supported this report concerning a Commission proposal for a Directive upgrading the use of digital tools and processes in company law. Given the developments in digitalisation and technology in recent years, the amending directives changes how businesses register, companies and authorities operate and communicate on company-law related issues. Among other things, the new rules will ensure that national registers contain as much and as reliable information about companies to be shared in cross-border situations as possible.
Statistics on population and housing (A9-0284/2023 - Irena Joveva)
I abstained on this proposal, which concerns a regulation on European statistics on population and housing, amending Regulation (EC) No 862/2007. In short, it focuses on how we count people within the European Union, concretely within the European Statistical System (ESS).To be noted that this data influences all per capita indicators – as it is the denominator – and measures the weights for qualified majority voting in the Council. Whilst we recognise the importance of such a proposal, what has been presented was not near enough finalisation for us to support.
Amending Directive 2013/36/EU as regards supervisory powers, sanctions, third-country branches, and environmental, social and governance risks (A9-0029/2023 - Jonás Fernández)
Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor (A9-0030/2023 - Jonás Fernández)
I strongly rejected this part of the banking package.Basel III is the latest agreed set of rules for banking capital reserves to make sure there is never again a banking crash.The Commission proposal, however, completely undermines the rules by allowing deviations, exceptions and delays.There are some technical improvements but the overall political picture is that the EU, under industry pressure, is failing to implement fully the new rules and so is risking financial stability.
The sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (A9-0150/2023 - Luděk Niedermayer, Paul Tang)
Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (A9-0151/2023 - Eero Heinäluoma, Damien Carême)
Establishing the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (A9-0128/2023 - Eva Maria Poptcheva, Emil Radev)
Gradual roll-out of Eudamed, information obligation in case of interruption of supply and the transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices (C9-0010/2024)
I supported this Commission proposal to amend the ‘Medical Devices Regulation’ (MDR) and the ‘In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation’ (IVDR) so that the rollout of the European database on medical devices (EUDAMED) would be extended, after concerns were raised that the database would not be ready on time.
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2025 – Section I – European Parliament (A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou)
Draft amending budget No 3/2024: Reinforcing the European Public Prosecutor's Office following the accession of Poland and the expected participation of Sweden (A9-0179/2024 - Siegfried Mureşan)
Advance passenger information: prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime (A9-0411/2023 - Assita Kanko)
Framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology products manufacturing ecosystem (Net Zero Industry Act) (A9-0343/2023 - Christian Ehler)
Russia's undemocratic presidential elections and their illegitimate extension to the occupied territories (RC-B9-0253/2024, B9-0253/2024, B9-0255/2024, B9-0256/2024, B9-0259/2024, B9-0260/2024)
I supported this resolution as it addresses the unfree presidential elections held in Russia recently. This election was marked by the absence of legitimate political competition and a repressive environment that excluded and clamped down on dissent. The resolution strongly condemns these elements as these elements highlighted that the authorities’ conduct and manipulation of these elections were far from democratic, and created a facade of legitimacy for Putin.
New allegations of Russian interference in the European Parliament, in the upcoming EU elections and the impact on the Union (RC-B9-0262/2024, B9-0261/2024, B9-0262/2024, B9-0263/2024, B9-0264/2024, B9-0265/2024, B9-0266/2024) (vote)
Attempts to reintroduce a foreign agent law in Georgia and its restrictions on civil society (RC-B9-0244/2024, B9-0244/2024, B9-0246/2024, B9-0247/2024, B9-0248/2024, B9-0251/2024)
I supported the resolution condemning the recent passage of the draft law on ‘transparency of foreign influence’, which has been globally criticised for severely restricting the operational freedom of media and civil society organisations, and for violation of the democratic and international commitments of Georgia. It also emphasises the importance of civil society and independent media in democracy and EU accession processes, and it calls for respecting fundamental freedoms like expression and assembly.
Iran’s unprecedented attack against Israel, the need for de-escalation and an EU response (RC-B9-0235/2024, B9-0235/2024, B9-0237/2024, B9-0239/2024, B9-0240/2024, B9-0249/2024, B9-0250/2024, B9-0252/2024)
I voted in favour of this resolution as I support the need for de-escalation and a diplomatic solution in response. However, this resolution does not do enough to emphasise the context of Iran’s retaliation, which was Israel’s targeting of its consulate in the first place, and deflects negative attention away from Israel. I also voted in line with the Council’s position on Hezbollah and so opposed the amendment on labelling Hezbollah in its entirety as a terrorist organisation, as the Council already has labelled Hezbollah’s military wing as a terrorist organisation. Additionally, the resolution was not critical enough of the IDF and its actions, and was severely lacking in balance.
Written questions (227)
Payments for cross-border workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
Irish language derogation
Direct Provision System
Treatment of refugees
Erasmus and the COVID-19 Crisis
Potential annexation of Palestinian land
Suspension of fiscal rules
EU passenger rights
Proposed measures by the Commission to support banks dealing with the impact of COVID-19
Aggressive tax planning
Tourism rescue package for peripheral region
Myalgic encephalomyelitis
Funding for the Gaeltacht (Irish-speaking areas)
Right to disconnect
FinTech
COVID-19 reserve fund
Brexit Fund share by Member State
Licensing of Kaftrio for cystic fibrosis sufferers
Commission guidelines on regional aid
Support for rural areas affected by the increase in land designations
Mass arrest of LGBTI activists in Poland
Estimated treatment cost
Access to COVID-19 treatments
Lobster fisheries
European Court of Auditor’s Special Report of September 2020
A Waste Action Plan for a Circular Economy – Ireland’s National Waste Policy 2020-2025
The dispensing of veterinary medicinal products
European Structural and Investment Funds & Regional Assemblies in Ireland
Israel’s actions in contravention of the Geneva Convention
Zero VAT on personal protective equipment (PPE)
Sign language interpretation in the EU institutions
Compliance with CETA
Public transport
Petrol and diesel cars
Human rights in Bahrain
Absence of a control report in land eligibility inspections on farmers
State aid Temporary Framework
National Broadband Plan in Ireland
COVID-19 and travel agents
PGI application: inclusion of north of Ireland
Wastewater treatment systems
Interpretation of Directive 2003/88/EC
TEN-T Network
LEDs in car lights
Interinstitutional agreement on the Recovery and Resilience Fund
The relevance of voluntary pooling and licensing of intellectual property related to COVID-19 therapeutics and vaccines.
The ECtHR has given another judgment against Spain for failing to investigate a case of torture of a detained person
European Citizens’ Initiatives
European Banking Authority guidelines
Mutton Island Wastewater Treatment Plant
Monitoring of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing
Legal definitions of factory trawler and super trawler
Animal feed imports
Moneylenders
Breaches of EU guidelines – EU funding of Israeli entities in the occupied Palestinian territory
Bee imports
Ireland’s national recovery and resilience plan
Satellite internet
Regional airports
Lough Funshinagh
KBC Bank
Agricultural emissions
Right to prescribe anti-parasitic medicines
Climate change budget
North-South interconnector on the island of Ireland
Animal welfare
Fishing vessels
Open tendering for employment services
The snail’s pace progress of EU justice in ending discrimination against lettori in Italian universities
The EU and the UN Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel
Mica and pyrite
Shipping fees
EU fishing quotas
VAT rules
CAP upper payment limit and ANCs
Subject: Case 13/13 and torture cases
EU web accessibility for persons with disabilities
Water quality in Ireland
Transfer of pilots’ licences
Hemp foods produced using solvents
Broadband
Bahrain
CAP – Eligible hectares affected by wildfires
Brexit and the moving of products of animal origin from October 2021
Forestry as an environmental scheme
Derrybrien wind farm
Member State energy sovereignty and fracked gas imports
Calculation of interest on common agricultural policy penalties
Force majeure and common agricultural policy payments
Mass slaughter of dolphins and whales in the Faroe Islands and the role of Danish authorities
The Mortgage Credit Directive and the cross‑border offer of credit services
Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike
European Works Council Directive (94/45/EC)
Israel’s decision to designate six Palestinian human rights NGOs as terrorist organisations
Former fishing vessel
The consolidation of payment entitlements by Ireland
Regional airports
Commission recommendation on the prevention of harmful practices
Increased grant aid for women farmers
Deaths of prisoners of conscience in Saudi Arabia
Rights in relation to access to digital audio recordings
Public tender for regional employment services
Air passenger rights
Vaccine exports and donations
Access to health records for mother and baby home survivors
General Data Protection Regulation
US authorities’ refusal to grant a visa to an MEP
Britain’s trade deals are impacting EU farmers
EU funding for integration projects
Island Member States’ specificities for new road transport rules
Funding for Palestinian NGOs
TEN-T
Taxonomy assessment of the Platform on Sustainable Finance
Unpaid traineeships in EU institutions
Educational requirements under the common agricultural policy
Amnesty International report on Israeli apartheid against the Palestinian people
Impact of the COVID‑19 outbreak on the aquaculture and fisheries sector
Irish Language Act
Housing report
Eircode investigation
The Trans-European Transport Network
Organic egg production during crises
Facility of obtaining EU visas for family members of EU citizens
Calculation of N – 1 compliance at a regional level
EU action tackling China’s distant‑water fleet, which is involved in human rights abuses, illegal fishing and bottom trawling
Agricultural crisis reserve
Consolidation of payments
Virtual gaming
Brexit and veterinary medicines
Consumer rights when purchasing airline tickets
Brexit Adjustment Reserve funding for ports and harbours in Ireland
VAT on farm machinery
Agricultural appeals
Farmers benefiting from microgeneration using panels funded under the Targeted Agricultural Modernisation Scheme
Increased fodder production
Access to international protection
Frontex and human rights
Proposal to make 2024 the European Year of Islands
Young farmers and the new common agricultural policy
Education
European Health Emergency preparedness and Response Authority support for low‑ and middle‑income countries
Fertiliser production
Decommissioning scheme for fishing vessels
Provision of subsidised childcare
Farm inspections under the basic payments scheme
Disposable electronic cigarettes
Article 1(a) of Annex II to Commission Regulation (EC) No 589/2008
Insurance
The EU response to raids on Palestinian civil society organisations
Online platforms and the Fifth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive
Medical Devices Regulation
Retrofitting
Motor Vehicle Block Exemption Regulation
Human rights abuses in Egypt – the detention of Alaa Abd El Fattah
Compensation in the event of suspected/confirmed tuberculosis in alpaca herds
Crypto-Assets Regulation
Corruption allegations
Beneficial ownership
Vulture funds
Revising public procurement legislation to stop the publicly financed race to the bottom on working conditions
Protection for LGBTIQ+ people in the Kakuma refugee camp
Proposed biogas plant near to Coole Park Special Area of Conservation
Ireland's long-term climate strategy
Crypto-assets legislation
Financial regulations and legislation
Requests for the inclusion of minority languages as official languages of the EU
Crypto-asset exchanges
Next steps for the Energy Charter Treaty
Advertising by electricity suppliers and the Guarantees of Origin scheme
EU readiness for Irish reunification
State aid and forestry in Ireland
Accessibility of multi-factor authentication for better cybersecurity
Push Payment Fraud
Harmonisation of training for the dental hygienist profession
Recognition of surgical oncology as a specialist discipline in the EU
Apple’s circumvention of the common charger directive
Energy performance standards for caravans and mobile homes
Transfer of power advancing annexation of the West Bank by Israel
VAT gaps
The use of cash in Irish society
Reduction of electricity consumption during peak hours
ESRB task force on crypto-assets
UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories
Audiovisual Media Services Directive
LGBT+ rights situation in Uganda
Social progress protocol
Transparency around corporate lobbying
Access to EU funds
Access to water in Cleragh and Lisduff
Evictions in Jerusalem's Old City
List of non-cooperative jurisdictions
The rhododendron
Allergy information
EU aid to support Irish grain sector
Ireland: State aid and the Irish Forestry Programme
Birds Directive
Legal protection of rainbow families in Italy
Pact between the EU and Tunisia
Freedom of movement for students with disabilities
New genomic techniques and traceability requirements
Tynagh mine
Accessibility requirements linked to EU funds used for housing and retrofitting
Irish insurance industry
Insurance costs
Proposed new own resource
Social impact of inflation
The Burren Programme
Brexit Adjustment Reserve regulation
Your Europe Advice
Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Detention of members of the High Follow-Up Committee on the issues of the Arab population of Israel
Forestry Programme 2023-2027
Norwegian herring
Energy Tax Directive’s application to electricity from renewable sources
Genetic Resources Strategy for Europe
Digital Services Act
Public Procurement Directive 2014/24/EU
EU budget
Commission conclusions on the review of EU financial assistance to Palestine – extended screening of PEGASE
Regulation on Deforestation-Free Products
Israel’s disregard for international law and the provisional measures of the International Court of Justice
Wastewater infrastructure
EU law as it applies to electricity companies
Insurance Ireland
Irish Occupied Territories Bill and public policy exemption
Review of the common agricultural policy (CAP)
Certification framework for carbon removals and carbon credits for farmers
Amendments (747)
Amendment 5 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the EU Regional Competitiveness Index measures the major factors of competitiveness for all the NUTS-2 level regions across the European Union which includes rural areas; Notes that the Member States with the highest proportion of the least competitive rural regions in the EU were found to be in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain,1a _________________ 1a European Commission, EU Regional Competitiveness Index 2022
Amendment 25 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights the potential for rural areas, and farms in particular, for the development of renewable energies, such as solar panels on the roofs of farm buildings; underlines the need to ensure that rural areas are well connected to an adequately reinforced electricity grid to allow rural renewable energy producers to fully participate in the energy transition;
Amendment 29 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recognises the importance of infrastructural development in rural regions in order to attract investment and employment opportunities to these areas and halt rural depopulation.
Amendment 31 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Recognises that many rural regions have suffered from long term underinvestment; underlines the need to adopt a policy of ‘positive discrimination’ to ensure that rural areas can thrive and ensure that rural citizens enjoy the same quality of life as those elsewhere.
Amendment 32 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Highlights that many ‘Less Developed’ and ‘In Transition’ regions are predominantly rural, and calls for greater targeted financial supports to enable these regions to grow and develop
Amendment 33 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Calls for a rural-proofing mechanism for European legislation to be introduced, to ensure that rural regions are not unfairly impacted by any new proposals and to ensure that rural concerns are taken on board during the decision making process.
Amendment 34 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 f (new)
Paragraph 1 f (new)
Amendment 35 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 g (new)
Paragraph 1 g (new)
1g. Insists on the importance of ensuring the provision of high quality social infrastructure and services, including in the context of rural development, particularly in the areas of health, housing and childcare.
Amendment 36 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 h (new)
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1h. Insists on the importance of ensuring proper investment into rural regions' airports, ports, high-speed and normal rail and other methods of public transport; Investment support should also include businesses utilising rail freight, with the view of improving connectivity, tourism, efficient mobility of goods, foreign direct investment, accessibility, and access to markets.
Amendment 37 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 i (new)
Paragraph 1 i (new)
1i. Calls for increased support to rural regions' higher education institutes in improving their R&D capabilities to attract greater funding levels, increasing the possibility of innovation.
Amendment 38 #
2023/2044(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 j (new)
Paragraph 1 j (new)
1j. Stresses that in order to effectively harnass talent in EU regions, particularly rural areas, fairer land governance and tackling rural land grabbing at national level is crucial; Notes that land grabbing can be generally considered to be the legal or illegal control of ‘larger than locally- typical’ amounts of land by any persons or entities for purposes of speculation, extraction, resource control or commodification at the expense of local rural communties, affordable land costs, family farmers, generational renewal, agroecology, agroforestry, land stewardship, food sovereignty and human rights.
Amendment 61 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the sustainable production and supply of animal and plant-based proteins are crucial for the transition towards more sustainable food systems with a reduced climate and biodiversity impact;
Amendment 108 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the market for organic and sustainable plant-based, animal and alternative sources of protein is steadily increasing due to consumer demand;
Amendment 126 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas sustainable aquaculture has a crucial role in global food security and nutrition;
Amendment 139 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas cell-based agriculture and seafood farming are novel, promising and innovative solutions;
Amendment 166 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas research and innovation on plant proteins needsfor all types of plant proteins as well as for animal sourced proteins need to be scaled up;.
Amendment 180 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas it is important to adopt a value chain approach in order to create added value for sustainable animal and plant-based protein sources;
Amendment 250 #
2023/2015(INI)
4. A holistic approach that includes the whole food value chain and trade policy approaches;
Amendment 264 #
Amendment 327 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that developing the productionsustainable production and supply of plant and alternative sources of protein in the EU is an effective way of addressing many of the environmental and climate challenges that the EU faces;
Amendment 388 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to propose medium- and long-term policy measures to close the nutrient loop, such as enand assess the environmental and socio- economic feasabilingty of the use of recovered nitrogen from manure (RENURE) products, particularly for small and medium farmers;
Amendment 483 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that innovative cell- based food canis novel but may help increase protein production and support agriculture but continued research is needed;
Amendment 537 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for more research and development into plant-basall types of plant-based, animal sourced and alternative proteins;
Amendment 553 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Subheading 5
A holistic approach that includes the whole food value chain and trade policy approaches
Amendment 558 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Underlines that improved coordination and collaboration between the supply chain’s stakeholders is needed to bridge the current gaps between farmers, processors and retailers; considers, in this sense, that the role of farmers organisations, agri-cooperatives and relevant stakeholders is crucial;
Amendment 563 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Underlines that there are concerns around carbon leakage in the context of dependency on imported protein from third countries; notes that the importation of protein products from third countries in regions such as South Amercia and Oceania often require long-distance transportation, which can contribute to GHG emissions from fossil fuel consumption during transportation; emphasises that this may result in a higher carbon footprint compared to locally produced protein sources;
Amendment 566 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Highlights that, in the context of carbon leakage in trade with third countries, the cultivation and importation of protein crops such as soy from third countries in regions like South America is associated with deforestation and unsustainable land use change as producers are held to lower sustainability, regulatory and ethical standards than EU producers; insists that third country producers and exporters of protein products to the European Union be held to the same standards as EU producers to ensure a level playing field;
Amendment 595 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Stresses that action at all levels is needed in order to increase protein productlocal and sustainable protein production; emphasises that the strategy does not undermine the local and regional production, supply and consumption of sustainable animal-based protein products such as meat and dairy in the European Union;
Amendment 614 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – introductory part
Paragraph 32 – introductory part
32. Calls on the Commission to put forwardassess the following policy actionconcepts:
Amendment 617 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point i
Paragraph 32 – point i
i. A feed additive regulation that promotes sStability and innovation in the production of feed additives;
Amendment 629 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point ii
Paragraph 32 – point ii
ii. Novel food legislation that simplifies and speeds up authorisation processesEfficient authorisation processes for novel foods that also ensure that potential health risks are avoided in line with the precautionary principle;
Amendment 643 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point iv
Paragraph 32 – point iv
iv. A renewable energy directive that allows for the long-termThe long-term, sustainable and stable regulation of biofuel production;
Amendment 648 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point v
Paragraph 32 – point v
v. An energy taxation directive that provides cClear and long-term rules for all bio-based fuels;
Amendment 654 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point vi
Paragraph 32 – point vi
vi. A regulation on new genomic techniques that allows nNew breeding techniques to be adopted;
Amendment 694 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point xiii
Paragraph 32 – point xiii
xiii. A clear research and development funding strategy to promote and stimulate the market uptake of sustainable animal sourced and plant-based proteins for food and feed in the EU, including organic;
Amendment 708 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point xiii a (new)
Paragraph 32 – point xiii a (new)
xiiia. Trade policy approaches to avoid carbon leakage in the agri-food sector;
Amendment 712 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point xiii b (new)
Paragraph 32 – point xiii b (new)
xiiib. Addressing deforestation-linked trade and importation of protein products from third countries;
Amendment 73 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Title 1 a (new)
Title 1 a (new)
The European Parliament rejects the Commission Proposal
Amendment 131 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In a context where cash alone cannot answer the needs of a digitalised economy, it is essential to support financial inclusion by ensuring universal, affordable and easy access to the digital euro to individuals in the euro area, as well as its wide acceptance in payments. In this respect, Member States should ensure sufficient and effective access to public entities, in all their different regions, including urban and non-urban areas. Member States should determine the number and geographical distribution of entities on the basis of common indicators. Financial exclusion in the digitalised economy may increase as private digital means of payments may not specifically cater for vulnerable groups of the society or may not be suitable in some rural or remote areas without a (stable) communication network. According to the World Bank and the Bank for International Settlements, “efficient, accessible and safe retail payment systems and services are critical for greater financial inclusion”.24 That finding was further substantiated by the study on new Digital Payment Methods commissioned by the European Central Bank, which concluded that for the unbanked/underbanked/offline population, the most important features of a new payment method are easiness of use, not requiring technological skills, and to be secure and free of charge.25 A digital euro would offer a public alternative to private digital means of payments and support financial inclusion as it would be designed along these objectives, thus catering for free access, easiness of use and wide accessibility and acceptance. Member States should ensure a high level of quality of the support provided and a service which is targeted to the needs of vulnerable consumers. Member States should assess the quality of advice on the basis of common indicators. __________________ 24 https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/ en/806481470154477031/pdf/Payment- Aspects-of-Financial-Inclusion.pdf 25 Study on New Digital Payment Methods (europa.eu), March 2022. According to the World Bank, financial inclusion means that individuals have access to useful and affordable financial products and services that meet their needs – transactions, payments, savings, credit and insurance”.
Amendment 131 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In a context where cash alone cannot answer the needs of a digitalised economy, it is essential to support financial inclusion by ensuring universal, affordable and easy access to the digital euro to individuals in the euro area, as well as its wide acceptance in payments. In this respect, Member States should ensure sufficient and effective access to public entities, in all their different regions, including urban and non-urban areas. Member States should determine the number and geographical distribution of entities on the basis of common indicators. Financial exclusion in the digitalised economy may increase as private digital means of payments may not specifically cater for vulnerable groups of the society or may not be suitable in some rural or remote areas without a (stable) communication network. According to the World Bank and the Bank for International Settlements, “efficient, accessible and safe retail payment systems and services are critical for greater financial inclusion”.24 That finding was further substantiated by the study on new Digital Payment Methods commissioned by the European Central Bank, which concluded that for the unbanked/underbanked/offline population, the most important features of a new payment method are easiness of use, not requiring technological skills, and to be secure and free of charge.25 A digital euro would offer a public alternative to private digital means of payments and support financial inclusion as it would be designed along these objectives, thus catering for free access, easiness of use and wide accessibility and acceptance. Member States should ensure a high level of quality of the support provided and a service which is targeted to the needs of vulnerable consumers. Member States should assess the quality of advice on the basis of common indicators. __________________ 24 https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/ en/806481470154477031/pdf/Payment- Aspects-of-Financial-Inclusion.pdf 25 Study on New Digital Payment Methods (europa.eu), March 2022. According to the World Bank, financial inclusion means that individuals have access to useful and affordable financial products and services that meet their needs – transactions, payments, savings, credit and insurance”.
Amendment 149 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Like euro banknotes and coins, the digital euro should be a direct liability of the European Central Bank or of the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro towards digital euro users. The digital euro should be issued for an amount equal to the face value of the corresponding liability on the consolidated balance sheet of the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro, in particular by converting payment service providers’ central bank reserves into digital euro holdings, to satisfy demand from digital euro users. To hold and use digital euros, digital euro users should only need to establish a contractual relationship with payment service providers distributing the digital euro to open digital euro payment accounts and should be able to decide not to link their digital euro payment account to a non-digital euro payment account. No account or other contractual relationship would be established between the digital euro user and the European Central Bank or the national central banks, without prejudice to the possibility of appointing the national central bank as the public entity of a Member State distributing the digital euro. Payment service providers should manage the digital euro accounts of digital euro users on their behalf and provide them with digital euro payment services. Since payment service providers are not a party to the direct liability held by digital euro users towards the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro, and are acting on behalf of digital euro users, the insolvency of payment service providers would not affect digital euro users.
Amendment 149 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Like euro banknotes and coins, the digital euro should be a direct liability of the European Central Bank or of the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro towards digital euro users. The digital euro should be issued for an amount equal to the face value of the corresponding liability on the consolidated balance sheet of the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro, in particular by converting payment service providers’ central bank reserves into digital euro holdings, to satisfy demand from digital euro users. To hold and use digital euros, digital euro users should only need to establish a contractual relationship with payment service providers distributing the digital euro to open digital euro payment accounts and should be able to decide not to link their digital euro payment account to a non-digital euro payment account. No account or other contractual relationship would be established between the digital euro user and the European Central Bank or the national central banks, without prejudice to the possibility of appointing the national central bank as the public entity of a Member State distributing the digital euro. Payment service providers should manage the digital euro accounts of digital euro users on their behalf and provide them with digital euro payment services. Since payment service providers are not a party to the direct liability held by digital euro users towards the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro, and are acting on behalf of digital euro users, the insolvency of payment service providers would not affect digital euro users.
Amendment 158 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Since the digital euro requires the capacity to accept digital means of payment, imposing an obligation of mandatory acceptance of payments in digital euro on all payees could be disproportionate. To this end, exceptions to the mandatory acceptance of payments in digital euro should be provided for natural persons acting in the course of a purely personal or household activity. Exceptions to mandatory acceptance should also be provided for microenterprises, which are particularly important in the euro area for the development of entrepreneurship job creation and innovation, playing a vital role in shaping the economy. Union policies and actions should reduce regulatory burdens for enterprises of this size. Exceptions to mandatory acceptance should also be provided for non-profit legal entities which promote the public interest and serve the public good performing a variety of goals of societal interest, including equity, education, health, environmental protection and human rights. For microenterprises and non-profit legal entities, the acquisition of the required infrastructure and the acceptance costs would be disproportionate. They should therefore be exempted from the obligation to accept payments in digital euro. In such cases, other means for the settlement of monetary debts should remain available. Nevertheless, microenterprises and non-profit legal entities that accept comparable digital means of payment from payers should be subject to the mandatory acceptance of payments in digital euro. Comparable dDigital means of payment should include debit card payment or instant payment or other future technological solutions used at the point of interaction, but should exclude credit transfer and direct debit that are not initiated at the point of interaction. Microenterprises and non-profit legal entities that do not accept comparable digital means of payment from their payers in settlement of a debt (e.g. they only accept euro banknotes and coins), but may use digital payments in settlement of a debt to their payees (e.g. they pay with credit transfers), should not be subject to the mandatory acceptance of payments in digital euro. Finally, a payee may also refuse a payment in digital euro if the refusal is made in good faith and if the payee justifies the refusal on legitimate and temporary grounds, proportionate to concrete circumstances beyond its control, leading to an impossibility to accept payments in digital euro at the relevant time of the transaction, such as a power outage in the case of online digital euro payment transactions, or a defective device in the case of offline or online digital euro payment transactions.
Amendment 158 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Since the digital euro requires the capacity to accept digital means of payment, imposing an obligation of mandatory acceptance of payments in digital euro on all payees could be disproportionate. To this end, exceptions to the mandatory acceptance of payments in digital euro should be provided for natural persons acting in the course of a purely personal or household activity. Exceptions to mandatory acceptance should also be provided for microenterprises, which are particularly important in the euro area for the development of entrepreneurship job creation and innovation, playing a vital role in shaping the economy. Union policies and actions should reduce regulatory burdens for enterprises of this size. Exceptions to mandatory acceptance should also be provided for non-profit legal entities which promote the public interest and serve the public good performing a variety of goals of societal interest, including equity, education, health, environmental protection and human rights. For microenterprises and non-profit legal entities, the acquisition of the required infrastructure and the acceptance costs would be disproportionate. They should therefore be exempted from the obligation to accept payments in digital euro. In such cases, other means for the settlement of monetary debts should remain available. Nevertheless, microenterprises and non-profit legal entities that accept comparable digital means of payment from payers should be subject to the mandatory acceptance of payments in digital euro. Comparable dDigital means of payment should include debit card payment or instant payment or other future technological solutions used at the point of interaction, but should exclude credit transfer and direct debit that are not initiated at the point of interaction. Microenterprises and non-profit legal entities that do not accept comparable digital means of payment from their payers in settlement of a debt (e.g. they only accept euro banknotes and coins), but may use digital payments in settlement of a debt to their payees (e.g. they pay with credit transfers), should not be subject to the mandatory acceptance of payments in digital euro. Finally, a payee may also refuse a payment in digital euro if the refusal is made in good faith and if the payee justifies the refusal on legitimate and temporary grounds, proportionate to concrete circumstances beyond its control, leading to an impossibility to accept payments in digital euro at the relevant time of the transaction, such as a power outage in the case of online digital euro payment transactions, or a defective device in the case of offline or online digital euro payment transactions.
Amendment 159 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to ensure that additional exceptions to the mandatory acceptance of the digital euro may be introduced at a later stage if they are required, for example due to technical specificities that may appear in the future, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the introduction of additional exceptions of a monetary law nature to the obligation to accept digital euro payment transactions, which would apply in a harmonised way across the euro area, taking into account any proposals from Member States to this end. The Commission may only adopt such exceptions if they are necessary, justified on grounds of general interest, proportionate, and preserve the effectiveness of the legal tender status of the digital euro, and if other public means of payments are available. The power of the Commission to adopt delegated acts for the introduction of additional exceptions to the obligation to accept digital euro payment transactions should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States, pursuant to their own powers in areas of shared competence, to adopt national legislation introducing exceptions to the mandatory acceptance deriving from the legal tender status in accordance with the conditions laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment in Joined Cases C-422/19 and C- 423/19.
Amendment 159 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to ensure that additional exceptions to the mandatory acceptance of the digital euro may be introduced at a later stage if they are required, for example due to technical specificities that may appear in the future, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the introduction of additional exceptions of a monetary law nature to the obligation to accept digital euro payment transactions, which would apply in a harmonised way across the euro area, taking into account any proposals from Member States to this end. The Commission may only adopt such exceptions if they are necessary, justified on grounds of general interest, proportionate, and preserve the effectiveness of the legal tender status of the digital euro, and if other public means of payments are available. The power of the Commission to adopt delegated acts for the introduction of additional exceptions to the obligation to accept digital euro payment transactions should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States, pursuant to their own powers in areas of shared competence, to adopt national legislation introducing exceptions to the mandatory acceptance deriving from the legal tender status in accordance with the conditions laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment in Joined Cases C-422/19 and C- 423/19.
Amendment 189 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38 a (new)
Recital 38 a (new)
(38a) The unique situation of Northern Ireland requires consideration with a view to enabling citizens living there to use the digital euro on the same basis as citizens in the Eurozone.
Amendment 189 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38 a (new)
Recital 38 a (new)
(38a) The unique situation of Northern Ireland requires consideration with a view to enabling citizens living there to use the digital euro on the same basis as citizens in the Eurozone.
Amendment 267 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
28. ‘user alias’ means a unique pseudonymous identifier, that is different for different transactions in order to prevent the association or tracking of the user across transactions, used to protect user’s identity when processing digital euro payments that can only be attributable to an identifiable natural or legal person by the payment service provider distributing the digital euro or by the digital euro user;.
Amendment 267 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
28. ‘user alias’ means a unique pseudonymous identifier, that is different for different transactions in order to prevent the association or tracking of the user across transactions, used to protect user’s identity when processing digital euro payments that can only be attributable to an identifiable natural or legal person by the payment service provider distributing the digital euro or by the digital euro user;.
Amendment 299 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) where the payee is a an enterprise which employs fewer than 10 persons or whose annual turnover or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million, or is a non-profit legal entity as defined in in Article 2, point (18), of Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council44 , unless it accepts comparable digital means of payment; __________________ 44 Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 1).
Amendment 299 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) where the payee is a an enterprise which employs fewer than 10 persons or whose annual turnover or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million, or is a non-profit legal entity as defined in in Article 2, point (18), of Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council44 , unless it accepts comparable digital means of payment; __________________ 44 Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 (OJ L 170, 12.5.2021, p. 1).
Amendment 307 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 307 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 332 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of points (a) and (b), and upon prior approval byreceiving permission from the digital euro users, payment service providers shall link each digital euro payment account to a single non-digital euro payment account designated by the digital euro users. Digital euro users shall be allowed to have that designated non-digital euro payment account with a different payment service provider than the one where a given digital euro payment account is held or decide not to link a non-digital euro account at all.
Amendment 332 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of points (a) and (b), and upon prior approval byreceiving permission from the digital euro users, payment service providers shall link each digital euro payment account to a single non-digital euro payment account designated by the digital euro users. Digital euro users shall be allowed to have that designated non-digital euro payment account with a different payment service provider than the one where a given digital euro payment account is held or decide not to link a non-digital euro account at all.
Amendment 339 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. For the purpose of digital euro payment services, digital euro users shall only enter into a contractual relationship with PSPs. Digital euro users shall not have any contractual relationship with the European Central Bank or the national central banks. This is without prejudice to the possibility of appointing the national central bank as the public entity of a Member State distributing the digital euro.
Amendment 339 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6
Article 13 – paragraph 6
6. For the purpose of digital euro payment services, digital euro users shall only enter into a contractual relationship with PSPs. Digital euro users shall not have any contractual relationship with the European Central Bank or the national central banks. This is without prejudice to the possibility of appointing the national central bank as the public entity of a Member State distributing the digital euro.
Amendment 344 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. In case a payment service provider providing digital euro payment services enters into insolvency or other similar proceedings, the digital euro holdings of digital euro users would not be affected.
Amendment 344 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. In case a payment service provider providing digital euro payment services enters into insolvency or other similar proceedings, the digital euro holdings of digital euro users would not be affected.
Amendment 356 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States shall designate the authorities, which must be sufficiently resourced and geographically widespread, referred to in Article 1, point (f), of the Directive (EU) 2015/2366, or post office giro institutions referred to in Article 1, point (c), of the Directive (EU) 2015/2366 to:
Amendment 356 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States shall designate the authorities, which must be sufficiently resourced and geographically widespread, referred to in Article 1, point (f), of the Directive (EU) 2015/2366, or post office giro institutions referred to in Article 1, point (c), of the Directive (EU) 2015/2366 to:
Amendment 382 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – title
Article 16 – title
Amendment 382 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – title
Article 16 – title
Amendment 388 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. For the purpose of Article 15(1) shall limits be established, the European Central Bank shall develop instruments to limit the use of the digital euro as a store of value and shall decide on their parameters and use, in accordance with the framework set out in this Article. PSPs providing account servicing payment services within the meaning of Directive 2015/2366 to natural and legal persons referred to in Article 12(1) shall apply these limits to digital euro payment accounts.
Amendment 388 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. For the purpose of Article 15(1) shall limits be established, the European Central Bank shall develop instruments to limit the use of the digital euro as a store of value and shall decide on their parameters and use, in accordance with the framework set out in this Article. PSPs providing account servicing payment services within the meaning of Directive 2015/2366 to natural and legal persons referred to in Article 12(1) shall apply these limits to digital euro payment accounts.
Amendment 401 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) ensure the usability, attractiveness to consumers and acceptance of the digital euro as a legal tender instrument;
Amendment 401 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) ensure the usability, attractiveness to consumers and acceptance of the digital euro as a legal tender instrument;
Amendment 460 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. The European Central Bank shall regularly monitor the information that is relevant for the purposes of the amounts referred to in paragraph 2, and publish periodically the amounts resulting from that monitoring with an explanatory report. Based upon these publications, and notwithstanding paragraph 2, the Commission is empowered to set binding caps on merchant service charges and interchange fees chargeable by PSPs to ensure that the digital euro remains attractive to consumers.
Amendment 460 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. The European Central Bank shall regularly monitor the information that is relevant for the purposes of the amounts referred to in paragraph 2, and publish periodically the amounts resulting from that monitoring with an explanatory report. Based upon these publications, and notwithstanding paragraph 2, the Commission is empowered to set binding caps on merchant service charges and interchange fees chargeable by PSPs to ensure that the digital euro remains attractive to consumers.
Amendment 495 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17 a (new)
Article17a Comparability of fees for optional and value-added services 1. For optional and value-added services Article 3, 4, 5 paragraph 3, 4 and 5, Article 6, 7 and 8 of the Directive 2014/92/EU on the comparability of fees related to payment accounts, payment account switching and access to payment accounts with basic features shall apply to digital euro accounts. Without prejudice to Articles 47 and 48 of Directive 2007/64/EC and Article 12 of Directive 2008/48/EC, Member States shall ensure that payment service providers provide the consumer, at least annually and free of charge, with a statement of all fees incurred for optional and value-added services linked to a digital euro account. Where applicable, payment service providers shall use the standardised terms set out in the final list referred to in Article 3(5) of the Directive 2014/92/EU. The communication channel used to provide the statement of fees shall be agreed with the consumer. The statement of fees shall be provided on paper at least upon the request of the consumer. 2. The statement of fees shall specify at least the following information: (a) the unit fee charged for each service and the number of times the service was used during the relevant period, and where the services are combined in a package, the fee charged for the package as a whole, the number of times the package fee was charged during the relevant period and the additional fee charged for any service exceeding the quantity covered by the package fee; (b) the total amount of fees incurred during the relevant period for each service, each package of services provided and services exceeding the quantity covered by the package fee; (c) the total amount of fees charged for all services provided during the relevant period.
Amendment 495 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17 a (new)
Article17a Comparability of fees for optional and value-added services 1. For optional and value-added services Article 3, 4, 5 paragraph 3, 4 and 5, Article 6, 7 and 8 of the Directive 2014/92/EU on the comparability of fees related to payment accounts, payment account switching and access to payment accounts with basic features shall apply to digital euro accounts. Without prejudice to Articles 47 and 48 of Directive 2007/64/EC and Article 12 of Directive 2008/48/EC, Member States shall ensure that payment service providers provide the consumer, at least annually and free of charge, with a statement of all fees incurred for optional and value-added services linked to a digital euro account. Where applicable, payment service providers shall use the standardised terms set out in the final list referred to in Article 3(5) of the Directive 2014/92/EU. The communication channel used to provide the statement of fees shall be agreed with the consumer. The statement of fees shall be provided on paper at least upon the request of the consumer. 2. The statement of fees shall specify at least the following information: (a) the unit fee charged for each service and the number of times the service was used during the relevant period, and where the services are combined in a package, the fee charged for the package as a whole, the number of times the package fee was charged during the relevant period and the additional fee charged for any service exceeding the quantity covered by the package fee; (b) the total amount of fees incurred during the relevant period for each service, each package of services provided and services exceeding the quantity covered by the package fee; (c) the total amount of fees charged for all services provided during the relevant period.
Amendment 538 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. The European Central Bank and the national central banks mayshall make mechanisms available for payment services providers to facilitate the exchange of messages for the resolution of disputes. For technical errors, fraud related complaints and commercial disputes arising out of the contractual relationship with the Payment Service Provider or other issues like suspected double spending, a dispute resolution mechanism shall be implemented. Those mechanisms may be operated directly by the European Central Bank or by the providers of support services designated by the European Central Bank.
Amendment 538 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. The European Central Bank and the national central banks mayshall make mechanisms available for payment services providers to facilitate the exchange of messages for the resolution of disputes. For technical errors, fraud related complaints and commercial disputes arising out of the contractual relationship with the Payment Service Provider or other issues like suspected double spending, a dispute resolution mechanism shall be implemented. Those mechanisms may be operated directly by the European Central Bank or by the providers of support services designated by the European Central Bank.
Amendment 547 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. This dispute mechanism must be easily available for digital euro users and provide solutions within a reasonable period of time. The PSPs shall adhere to the timelines set out in the Payment Services Regulation COM/2023/367 final2 and the liability regime. The PSPs shall accept the outcome of the dispute mechanism which is monitored by the European Central Bank and national competent authorities
Amendment 547 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. This dispute mechanism must be easily available for digital euro users and provide solutions within a reasonable period of time. The PSPs shall adhere to the timelines set out in the Payment Services Regulation COM/2023/367 final2 and the liability regime. The PSPs shall accept the outcome of the dispute mechanism which is monitored by the European Central Bank and national competent authorities
Amendment 569 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The ECB and Commission shall jointly within six months of the publication of this legislation lay out precisely how the issue of "double spend", meaning where a digital Euro is duplicated and spent several times, shall be dealt with including how the user shall be reimbursed for their lost funds in cases of a technical problem that does not lie in the area of the responsibility of the user. This report shall consider options such as: a) limiting offline digital euro transactions limited to the amount of 250 euro per transaction b) deactivation of the offline digital euro function in cases of known security vulnerabilities, that risk double spending or other attacks on the digital euro. c) a time limit on how long an offline wallet can go unspent
Amendment 569 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The ECB and Commission shall jointly within six months of the publication of this legislation lay out precisely how the issue of "double spend", meaning where a digital Euro is duplicated and spent several times, shall be dealt with including how the user shall be reimbursed for their lost funds in cases of a technical problem that does not lie in the area of the responsibility of the user. This report shall consider options such as: a) limiting offline digital euro transactions limited to the amount of 250 euro per transaction b) deactivation of the offline digital euro function in cases of known security vulnerabilities, that risk double spending or other attacks on the digital euro. c) a time limit on how long an offline wallet can go unspent
Amendment 584 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. The European Central Bank shall consultand the European Data Protection Supervisor prior toshall jointly developing the details on the operational elements of the fraud detection and prevention mechanism.
Amendment 584 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. The European Central Bank shall consultand the European Data Protection Supervisor prior toshall jointly developing the details on the operational elements of the fraud detection and prevention mechanism.
Amendment 588 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 4
Article 32 – paragraph 4
4. For the purpose of this Article, payment service providers shall provide the fraud detection and prevention mechanism with information referred to in Annex 5. Payment service providers shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures including state-of-the-art security and privacy-preserving measures to ensure that the support service shall not be able to directly identify the digital euro users on the basis of the information provided to the fraud detection and prevention mechanism. Payment Service Providers, the European Central Bank and national Central Banks shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure that the processing of personal data is carried out in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to an individual digital euro user without the use of additional information in accordance with Article 4 (5) GDPR.
Amendment 588 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 4
Article 32 – paragraph 4
4. For the purpose of this Article, payment service providers shall provide the fraud detection and prevention mechanism with information referred to in Annex 5. Payment service providers shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures including state-of-the-art security and privacy-preserving measures to ensure that the support service shall not be able to directly identify the digital euro users on the basis of the information provided to the fraud detection and prevention mechanism. Payment Service Providers, the European Central Bank and national Central Banks shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure that the processing of personal data is carried out in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to an individual digital euro user without the use of additional information in accordance with Article 4 (5) GDPR.
Amendment 590 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33 a (new)
Article33a Processing of transaction data 1. Data about payment transactions of the digital euro shall only be processed for purposes contained in an exhaustive list and not for commercial purposes or shared with third parties within the open banking framework. 2. The only purposes for which payment data shall be processed are those described in Articles 34-37. 3. In the case a user of the digital euro is reidentified based on pseudonymous data without their consent by the fraud detection unit, the anti-money laundering unit, the ECB or any other law enforcement or public agency, that user has to be informed about their re- identification and its circumstances at the earliest point in time or at the latest when the investigation is concluded.
Amendment 590 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33 a (new)
Article33a Processing of transaction data 1. Data about payment transactions of the digital euro shall only be processed for purposes contained in an exhaustive list and not for commercial purposes or shared with third parties within the open banking framework. 2. The only purposes for which payment data shall be processed are those described in Articles 34-37. 3. In the case a user of the digital euro is reidentified based on pseudonymous data without their consent by the fraud detection unit, the anti-money laundering unit, the ECB or any other law enforcement or public agency, that user has to be informed about their re- identification and its circumstances at the earliest point in time or at the latest when the investigation is concluded.
Amendment 591 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Payment service providers perform a task ion the public interestbasis of a legal obligation in accordance with Article 6(1)(c) GDPR where they process personal data for the following purposes:
Amendment 591 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Payment service providers perform a task ion the public interestbasis of a legal obligation in accordance with Article 6(1)(c) GDPR where they process personal data for the following purposes:
Amendment 595 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the enforcement of limits, including the verification of whether prospective or existing digital euro users have digital euro accounts with another PSP, as referred to in Article 16;
Amendment 595 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the enforcement of limits, including the verification of whether prospective or existing digital euro users have digital euro accounts with another PSP, as referred to in Article 16;
Amendment 598 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the provision of offline digital euro, including the registration and de- registration of the local storage devices as referred to in letter (b) of Annex I;
Amendment 598 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the provision of offline digital euro, including the registration and de- registration of the local storage devices as referred to in letter (b) of Annex I;
Amendment 630 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36a Safeguards against Observability of User Behaviour The digital euro user shall be in full control of the digital euro wallet and their data. The technical architecture shall make it impossible for the issuer of the digital euro front- and backend or third- party services connected to them or the European Central Bank, National Competent Authorities or Payment Service Providers to collect or obtain information about the usage. The processing of transaction data shall not allow to track, link, correlate or otherwise obtain knowledge of transactions or user behaviour. Personal data relating to the provision of the digital euro shall be kept physically and logically separate from any other data held.
Amendment 630 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36a Safeguards against Observability of User Behaviour The digital euro user shall be in full control of the digital euro wallet and their data. The technical architecture shall make it impossible for the issuer of the digital euro front- and backend or third- party services connected to them or the European Central Bank, National Competent Authorities or Payment Service Providers to collect or obtain information about the usage. The processing of transaction data shall not allow to track, link, correlate or otherwise obtain knowledge of transactions or user behaviour. Personal data relating to the provision of the digital euro shall be kept physically and logically separate from any other data held.
Amendment 689 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) opening, holding and clos, closing and switching of a digital euro payment account;
Amendment 689 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) opening, holding and clos, closing and switching of a digital euro payment account;
Amendment 695 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point c
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) non-automated funding and defunding from a non- digital euro payment account;
Amendment 695 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point c
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) non-automated funding and defunding from a non- digital euro payment account;
Amendment 702 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) access to a dispute mechanism.
Amendment 702 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) access to a dispute mechanism.
Amendment 703 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g b (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g b (new)
(gb) digital inclusion support.
Amendment 703 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g b (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point g b (new)
(gb) digital inclusion support.
Amendment 706 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – point iii
Annex III – point 1 – point iii
(iii) information on digital euro payment accounts; includmeaning information on digital euro holdings of the digital euro user and the unique digital euro payment account number; and
Amendment 706 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – point iii
Annex III – point 1 – point iii
(iii) information on digital euro payment accounts; includmeaning information on digital euro holdings of the digital euro user and the unique digital euro payment account number; and
Amendment 708 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – point iv
Annex III – point 1 – point iv
(iv) information on online digital euro payment transactions, includmeaning the transaction identifier and the transaction amount.
Amendment 708 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – point iv
Annex III – point 1 – point iv
(iv) information on online digital euro payment transactions, includmeaning the transaction identifier and the transaction amount.
Amendment 710 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 – point iii
Annex III – point 2 – point iii
(iii) information on digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the unique digital euro payment account number; and
Amendment 710 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 – point iii
Annex III – point 2 – point iii
(iii) information on digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the unique digital euro payment account number; and
Amendment 712 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 – point iv
Annex III – point 2 – point iv
(iv) information of non-digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the account number of the linked non-digital euro payment account.
Amendment 712 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 – point iv
Annex III – point 2 – point iv
(iv) information of non-digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the account number of the linked non-digital euro payment account.
Amendment 713 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point i
Annex III – point 3 – point i
(i) the user identifier; includingand the name of the local storage device holders; and
Amendment 713 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point i
Annex III – point 3 – point i
(i) the user identifier; includingand the name of the local storage device holders; and
Amendment 714 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point ii
Annex III – point 3 – point ii
(ii) information on the local storage device, includmeaning the identifier of the local storage device.
Amendment 714 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point ii
Annex III – point 3 – point ii
(ii) information on the local storage device, includmeaning the identifier of the local storage device.
Amendment 715 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point i
Annex IV – point 1 – point i
(i) information on digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the unique digital euro payment account number; and
Amendment 715 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point i
Annex IV – point 1 – point i
(i) information on digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the unique digital euro payment account number; and
Amendment 716 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point ii
Annex IV – point 1 – point ii
(ii) information on online digital euro payment transactions. information linked to an unique digital euro payment account number, includingand the transaction amount.
Amendment 716 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 1 – point ii
Annex IV – point 1 – point ii
(ii) information on online digital euro payment transactions. information linked to an unique digital euro payment account number, includingand the transaction amount.
Amendment 717 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 3
Annex IV – point 3
3. For the purpose of point (c) of Article 35(1), processing shall be limited to the data required for counterfeit analysis of offline digital euro payment transactions: information on the local storage device, includmeaning the local storage device number.
Amendment 717 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 3
Annex IV – point 3
3. For the purpose of point (c) of Article 35(1), processing shall be limited to the data required for counterfeit analysis of offline digital euro payment transactions: information on the local storage device, includmeaning the local storage device number.
Amendment 719 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 4 – point iii
Annex IV – point 4 – point iii
(iii) information on digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the unique digital euro payment account number, digital euro holdings of the user, the holding limit selected by the user and the type of digital euro account.
Amendment 719 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – point 4 – point iii
Annex IV – point 4 – point iii
(iii) information on digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the unique digital euro payment account number, digital euro holdings of the user, the holding limit selected by the user and the type of digital euro account.
Amendment 721 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point i
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) information on digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the unique digital euro account identifier;
Amendment 721 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point i
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) information on digital euro payment accounts, includmeaning the unique digital euro account identifier;
Amendment 723 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point ii
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point ii
(ii) information on online digital euro payment transactions, includmeaning the transaction amount; and
Amendment 723 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point ii
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point ii
(ii) information on online digital euro payment transactions, includmeaning the transaction amount; and
Amendment 725 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point iii
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point iii
(iii) information on the transaction session of a digital euro user, includingand the device internet protocol address-range.
Amendment 725 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point iii
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point iii
(iii) information on the transaction session of a digital euro user, includingand the device internet protocol address-range.
Amendment 154 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point j – point iii
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point j – point iii
Amendment 161 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point k – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point k – paragraph 1
Amendment 164 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point k – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point k – paragraph 2
Amendment 173 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 7
Article 2 – paragraph 7
7. By [ OP please insert the date= one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the EBA shall issue Guidelines in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, addressThe EBA shall develop draft Regulatory Technical Standards to specify the conditions of the exclusion for payment transactions from the payer to the payee through a commercial agent referred to in paragraph 2, point (b) of this Article. The EBA shall submit the Regulatory Technical Standards referred to in the competent authorities designated undfirst subparagraph to the Commission by [ OP please insert this Regulation, on the exclusion for payment transactions from the payer to the payee through a commercial agent referred to in paragraph 2, point (b) of this Article. e date= one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. Power is delegated on the Commission to adopt the Regulatory Technical Standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Amendment 184 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 36 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 36 a (new)
(36 a) ‘e-wallet provider’ means a provider which offers consumers an application to manage one or several payment services within one application without entering at any time into the possession of the funds to be transferred;
Amendment 193 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 53
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 53
(53) ‘commercial trade name’ means the name which is commonly used by the payee in the course of their trade and marketing to identify itself to the payer;
Amendment 200 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where a currency conversion service is offered prior to the initiation of the payment transaction and where that currency conversion service is offered at an ATM, at the point of sale or by the payee, the party offering the currency conversion service to the payer shall disclose to the payer all charges and the exchange rate to be used for converting the payment transaction including prominent and transparent disclosure of any mark-up over the latest available applicable foreign exchange reference rate issued by the relevant central bank.
Amendment 206 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Natural or legal persons providing cash withdrawal services as referred to in Article 38 of Directive (EU) [PSD3] shall provide or make availablein a prominent and easily understandable manner to their customers information on any charges directly before the customer carries out the withdrawal as well as upon receipt of the cash when the transaction is completed.
Amendment 214 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Payment service providers shall provide or make availablein a prominent and easily understandable way to payment service users the following information and conditions:
Amendment 219 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) where applicable, the estimated charges for currency conversion in relation to credit transfers and money remittance transactions, expressed as a percentage mark-upin monetary value in the payer's currency over the latest available applicable foreign exchange reference rate issued by the relevant central bank;
Amendment 220 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The payment service provider shall provide in a prominent and easily understandable way the following information and conditions to the payment service user:
Amendment 227 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
(v) where applicable, the estimated charges for currency conversion services in relation to a credit transfers, expressed as a percentage mark-upin monetary value in the payer's currency over the latest available applicable foreign exchange reference rate issued by the relevant central bank;.
Amendment 271 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Payees must offer to payment service users at least one payment method without surcharges which does not rely on the use of a payment initiation service provider.
Amendment 273 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Traders such as creditors and insurance operators must offer to payment service users a way to share their data which does not rely on the use of account information service providers. Without prejudice to Regulation (EU) 2016/679, payment service providers shall inform consumers in a clear and comprehensible manner when they are presented with a personalised offer that is based on automated processing of personal data. Traders such as creditors and insurance operators shall ensure that the conditions to access their services do not discriminate against consumers legally resident in the Union on ground of their nationality or place of residence, the location of the payment account, the place of establishment of the payment service provider or the place of issue of the payment instrument within the Union or on any ground as referred to in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Any undertaking designated as a gatekeeper, pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act), shall not receive access to payment systems as account information service provider. Account information service providers shall not be allowed to combine account information data obtained pursuant to this Regulation with other types of personal data where such combination of data may result in harmful practices such as social scoring. The European Banking Authority shall develop draft Regulatory Technical Standards limiting the combination of data obtained by account information service providers with other types of personal data. The EBA shall submit the Regulatory Technical Standards referred to in the first subparagraph to the Commission by [ OP please insert the date= one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. When preparing the draft Regulatory Technical Standards referred to in subparagraph 6, the European Banking Authority shall closely cooperate with the European Data Protection Board established by Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Power is delegated on the Commission to adopt the Regulatory Technical Standards referred to in subparagraph 6 in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Amendment 287 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the dedicated interface shall apply a re-direction approach to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of the personalised security credentials and of authentication codes transmitted by or through the payment initiation service provider or the account information service provider;
Amendment 296 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – title
Article 37 – title
Data access parity between dedicated access interface and customer interfacefor third parties
Amendment 298 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. AIn line with Regulation 2016/679/EU [GDPR], account servicing payment service providers shall provide account information services providers with at least the samthe information from designated payment accounts and associated payment transactions made available to the payment service user when directly requesting access to the account information,necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is party provided that this information does not include sensitive payment data.
Amendment 300 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3
Article 37 – paragraph 3
3. AIn line with Regulation 2016/679/EU [GDPR], account servicing payment service providers shall provide payment initiation service providers with at least the samthe information onecessary for the initiation and execution of the payment transaction provided or made available to the payment service user when the transaction is initiated directly by the payment service user. That information shall be provided immediately after receipt of the payment order and on an ongoing basis until the payment is final.
Amendment 303 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 37 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The processing of customer data shall be limited to what is necessary in relation to the purpose for which it was processed. In accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, the EBA shall develop guidelines on the implementation of this paragraph for payment initiation services and account information services.
Amendment 305 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Article 37 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. When preparing the guidelines referred to in paragraph 3a of this Article, the EBA shall closely cooperate with the European Data Protection Board established by Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 401 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 1
Article 59 – paragraph 1
1. Where a payment services user who is a consumer was manipulated by a third party pretending to be an employee of the consumer’s payment service provider using the name or e-mail address or telephone number of that payment service provider unlawfully and that manipulation gave rise to subsequent fraudulent authorised payment transactions, the payment service provider shall refund the consumer the full amount of the fraudulent authorised payment transaction under the condition that the consumer has, without any delay, notified its payment service provider. Upon receipt of the notification, payment service providers shall inform consumers if a reported of the fraud case to the police and notified its payment service provideris required to further process their claim.
Amendment 403 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. WThe payer’s payment service provider shall refund the payer the amount of the transaction immediately, and in any event no later than by the end of the following business day, after noting or being notified of the manipulation of the transaction, except where the payer’s payment service provider has reasonable grounds to suspect a fraud or a gross negligence by the consumer and communicates those grounds to the relevant national authority in writing. Where the payer’s payment service provider had reasonable grounds for suspecting fraud or a gross negligence by the consumer, within 10 business days after noting or being notified of the fraudulent authorised payment transaction, the payment service provider shall do either of the following:
Amendment 411 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) where the payment service provider has reasonable grounds to suspect a fraud or a gross negligence by the consumer, provide aproof that the consumer has acted fraudulently or with gross negligence to the relevant national authority and provide to the payer a substantiated justification for refusing the refund and indicate to the consumer the bodies to which the consumer may refer the matter in accordance with Articles 90, 91, 93, 94 and 95 if the consumer does not accept the reasons provided.
Amendment 422 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 59 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Where informed by a payment service provider of the occurrence of the type of fraud as referred to in paragraph 1, online platforms and online search engines as defined in Regulation 2022/2065/EU [Digital Services Act] shall cooperate closely with payment service providers and act swiftly in removing fraudulent content from their websites.
Amendment 425 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 59 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Where the payment service provider is liable to the payment service user pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article resulting from an act or omission by a trader, the supplier shall be entitled to pursue remedies against the trader responsible. The trader against whom the payment service provider may pursue remedies and the relevant actions and conditions of exercise, shall be determined by national law.
Amendment 471 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 3
Article 83 – paragraph 3
3. To the extent necessary to comply with paragraph 1, point (c), payment service providers mayshall exchange the unique identifier of a payee with other payment service providers who are subject to information sharing arrangements as referred to in paragraph 5, when the payment service provider has sufficient evidence to assume that there was a fraudulent payment transaction. Sufficient evidence for sharing unique identifiers shall be assumed when at least two different payment services users who are customers of the same payment service provider or a consumer organisation have informed that a unique identifier of a payee was used to make a fraudulent credit transfer. Payment service providers shall not keep unique identifiers obtained following the information exchange referred to in this paragraph and paragraph 5 for longer than it is necessary for the purposes laid down in paragraph 1, point (c).
Amendment 477 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 4
Article 83 – paragraph 4
4. The information sharing arrangements shall define details for participation and shall set out the details on operational elements, including the use of dedicated IT platforms. Before concluding such arrangements, payment service providers shall conduct jointly a data protection impact assessment as referred to in Article 35 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and, where applicable, carry out prior consultation of the supervisory authority as referred to in Article 36 of that Regulation. The information sharing arrangements shall be concluded by [OP please insert the date = 12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 481 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 83 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. To facilitate the exchange of unique identifiers of payees with other payment service providers, the European Banking Authority shall set up a dedicated IT platform allowing payment service providers to exchange unique identifiers of payees which were used to make a fraudulent credit transfer by [OP please insert the date = 12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 485 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 83 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Where payment fraud originates in the publication of fraudulent content online, payment service providers shall, without undue delay, inform providers of hosting services following the procedure laid down in Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 [Digital Services Act]. Where the payer’s payment service provider fails to block a transaction to an IBAN identified as fraudulent as set out in this Article, the payer shall not bear any financial losses unless the payer has acted fraudulently.
Amendment 488 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 5 b (new)
Article 83 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Where the payer’s payment service provider fails to block a transaction to an IBAN identified as fraudulent as set out in this Article, the payer shall not bear any financial losses unless the payer has acted fraudulently.
Amendment 489 #
2023/0210(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 83 – paragraph 5 c (new)
Article 83 – paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. The payment service providers shall be responsible to provide evidence on whether the IBAN has been identified as fraudulent.
Amendment 29 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In order to ensure that the principle of mandatory acceptance of payments in euro banknotes and coins is not effectively undermined by widespread and structural refusals of cash payments, it is necessary for Member States to monitor the level of ex ante unilateral exclusions of payments in cash when transactions are performed in physical premises. Therefore, Member States should regularly monitor the level of unilateral ex ante exclusions of payments in cash when payments are performed in physical premises throughout their territory, in all their different regions, including urban and non-urban areas, on the basis of common indicators which allow for comparisons between the Member States. If in light of their assessment acceptance of payments in cash is ensured on their territory, Member States would not need to adopt specific measures in relation to their respective obligation. However, they would need to continue monitoring the situation. If a Member State concludes that ex ante unilateral exclusions of cash undermine the mandatory acceptance of payments in euro banknotes and coins in all or part of its territory, that Member State should take effective and proportionate measures to remedy the situation, such as a prohibition or restrictions on ex ante unilateral exclusions of cash in all or parts of its territory, for example in rural areas, or in certain sectors which are deemed essential such as post offices, supermarkets, pharmacies or healthcare, or for a Member State concludes that ex ante unilateral exclusions of cash undermine the mandatory acceptance of payments in euro banknotes and coins in all or part of its territory, that Member State should take effective measures to enforce the prohibition of ex ante unilateral exclusions of cash in all or parts of its territory. To this end, Member States should equip national competent authorities with all the required competencies and resources to ensure the mandatory accerptain types of payments which are deemed essentialnce by payees.
Amendment 34 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) With a view to an effective implementation of their obligation to ensure sufficient and effective access to cash, Member States should regularly monitor the level of access to cash throughout their territory, in all their different regions, including urban and non- urban areas, on the basis of common indicators which allow for comparisons between the Member States. Common indicators could include factors that affect access to cash, such as density of cash access points in relation to population, withdrawal and deposit conditions, including fees, the existence of different networks with different access modalities for customers, urban-rural and socio- economic variations, and access difficulties for certain population groups. If in the light of their assessment access to cash is deemed sufficient and effective on their territory, Member States would not need to adopt specific measures in relation to their respective obligation. However, they would need to continue monitoring the situation. If a Member State concludes that access to cash is not sufficient and effective in all or part of its territory, or is at risk of deteriorating in the absence of action, appropriate remedial measures should be taken to remedy the situation, such as geographic access requirements on payment service providers providing cash withdrawal services to maintain cash services at a sufficient number of their branch offices where they conduct business, or through an appointed agent for online only credit institutions, or maintain a sufficient density of automated teller machines (ATMs) where they conduct business taking into account a good geographic spread in relation to population, also taking into account possible pooling of ATMs. Other remedial measures could include recommendations addressed to non-credit institutions, such as independent ATM operators, retailers or post offices, encouraging to complement the cash services of banks. To facilitate monitoring by Member States, payment services providers and ATM providers should notify the national competent authority in writing of the closure of each ATM or bank branch and share an assessment of whether the sufficient and efficient access to cash is still guaranteed as defined by the common indicators. Where gaps in the access to cash appear, the provider responsible for the closure should take remedial measures to maintain efficient access to cash.
Amendment 37 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Cash has an essential role as a payment system in the event of natural or human-made disasters such as a floods, wild fires, cyberattacks and internet outages as other digital payment methods are likely not working in the event of a disaster. Member States should set up strategies to ensure efficient distribution and cash management processes adapted to different crisis scenarios.
Amendment 46 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) In accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation, the Commission, the European Central Bank and the designated national competent authorities with the required powers as regards acceptance of payments in cash and access to cash, and over the cash-related market activities of the cash industry should closely collaborate on issues related to acceptance of payments in cash and access to cash. A regular dialogue among these institutions and authorities, based notably on the annual reports of Member States to the Commission and the European Central Bank, should aim at identifying cases of widespread ex ante unilateral exclusions of cash and inadequate access to cash in specific national territories or regions. It would also aim at designing and adopting remedial measures that Member States should adopt as a means to comply with their obligations to ensure acceptance of cash and sufficient and effective access to cash.
Amendment 50 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
Amendment 54 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) Unilateral practices as to the non- acceptance of cash payments followed by public entities (e.g. public hospitals and public museums) are not regulated procedures for the settlement of pecuniary obligations provided for in the legislation of a Member State. They are thus ex ante unilateral exclusions of cash.
Amendment 63 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
4. ‘ex ante unilateral exclusions of cash’ means a situation when a retailer or service provider unilaterally excludes cash as a payment method for example by introducing a ‘no cash’ sign or by using a pre-formulated standard form contract. In this case, the payer and payee do not freely agree to a means of payment for a purchase;
Amendment 75 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) where, prior to the payment, the payee has agreed with the payer on a different means of payment in accordance with Article 5a.
Amendment 81 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
For the purposes of point (b), the burden of proof to establish that such an agreement existed in a particular case shall be on the payee.
Amendment 92 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5a Prohibition of ex ante unilateral exclusions of cash Payees subject to the obligation to accept euro banknotes and coins shall not use contractual terms that have not been individually negotiated or commercial practices which have the objective or the effect to exclude the use of cash by the payers of monetary debts denominated in euro. Such contractual terms or commercial practices shall not be binding on the payer. A contractual term shall be regarded as not individually negotiated where it has been drafted in advance and where the payer has therefore not been able to influence the substance of the term, particularly in the context of pre- formulated standard contracts.
Amendment 97 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6
Article 6
Amendment 103 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. If a Member State considers that the level of mandatory acceptance of payments in cash in their territory or parts thereof undermines mandatory acceptance of euro banknotes and coinshas been undermined, it shall set out the remedial measures it commits to take in accordance with Article 9(4).
Amendment 110 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Common indicators shall assess at least the following criteria: (a) The access to ATMs including the geographical distance by road and public transport and the number of ATMs in relation to population density; (b) The availability of ATMs for cash deposits and cash funding of digital euro accounts; (c) The availability of banknotes of different values at ATMs; (d) The availability of cash services over the counter including opening hours of bank branches; (e) The accessibility of ATMs and bank branches in line with the EU Accessibility Act; and Charges for cash services at ATMs and over the counter. (f) the availability of ATMs on a 24 hour basis.
Amendment 113 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. ATM providers and payment service providers who intend to close a bank branch or an ATM shall perform a detailed impact assessment based on the common indicators to ensure that sufficient and effective access to cash is still guaranteed after the closure of the bank branch or ATM. They shall notify their findings to the national competent authority in writing. Where gaps in the access to cash appear, the provider responsible for the closure shall take remedial measures to maintain efficient access to cash.
Amendment 114 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Member States shall set up strategies to guarantee sufficient and effective access to cash in the event of a natural or human-made disaster.
Amendment 122 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of Articles 7 and 8, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts of general application on a set of common indicators and concrete methodologies for the gathering of these indicators Member States shall use to monitor and assess the acceptance of payments in cash and access to cash throughout their territory, in all their different regions, including urban and non- urban areas. Those implementing acts shall be adopted [within X months after the entry into force of this Regulation] in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 11. When preparing those implementing acts, the Commission shall consult the European Central Bank.
Amendment 131 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. If a Member State considers that the level of acceptance of payments in cash undermines mandatory acceptance of euro banknotes and coins or that sufficient and effective access to cash is not ensured, it shall indicate in its annual report the remedial measures it commits to take in order to comply with the obligations set out in Articles 7 and 8 as well as the measures that have been implemented since the last reporting. The remedial measures shall enter into force without undue delay.
Amendment 143 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Member States shall lay down theharmonised rules on penalties [including financial penalties and non-criminal fines] applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States shall, within one year after the entry into force of this Regulation, notify the Commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Amendment 145 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The minimum penalties for infringements of this regulation for enterprises shall be subject to administrative fines up to 2 % of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year.
Amendment 152 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) the methodology according to which this data was gathered, processed and analysed;
Amendment 153 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(cb) statistics about complaints received by the national competent authority as per type of stakeholder, average elapsed time between date of submission and remedies and class of remedies provided;
Amendment 154 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall examine the annual reports in close consultation with the European Central Bank. The Commission shall publish the reports in all languages of the Member State concerned and in English.
Amendment 155 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission shall publish an annual transparency report that includes their analysis of the situation throughout the Union, trends observed, summaries of the discussions between the European Central Bank, the Commission and national competent authorities, as well as explanations for and evaluation of delegated acts adopted by the Commission according to this Regulation.
Amendment 159 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph -1 new
Article 14 – paragraph -1 new
-1. Member States shall lay down the rules on remedies applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The remedies provided for shall be effective and proportionate. Member States shall, within one year after the entry into force of this Regulation, notify the Commission of those rules and of those measures and shall notify it, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Amendment 160 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Member States shall provide natural persons, civil society organisations and enterprises with clear information on the channels and effective remedies they have at their disposal to lodge complaints with competent national authorities about cases of unlawful refusal to accept cash and insufficient and ineffective access to cash.
Amendment 165 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Without prejudice to the disputes concerning the lawfulness of the processing of personal data, the complaint mechanism shall oblige Member States to adhere to procedural guarantees for a reasonable and effective access to remedies within a period of one month. Directive (EU) 2020/1828 shall apply to the representative actions brought against infringements of provisions of this Regulation that harm or may harm the collective interests of consumers.
Amendment 166 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. The complaints may be lodged with the national competent authority in which the concerned party is established. On request of the complainant, the Commission may defer a case to another national competent authority. In case of cross-border complaints, the Commission shall have the right to defer the case to another national competent authority, upon request of the party that lodged the complaint.
Amendment 167 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 c (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Within 6 months of the entering into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall establish minimum requirements on the implementation of Article 14 by Member States.
Amendment 173 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Euro banknotes and coins and the digital euro shall be convertible into each other at parfully fungible.
Amendment 178 #
2023/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
By [date-fivthree years after the entry into force], the Commission shall carry out a review on the operation and effects of this Regulation and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. Member States shall provide the Commission with necessary information for the preparation of that report.
Amendment 34 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53 a (new)
Recital 53 a (new)
(53a) Definitions of what constitutes a vulnerable consumer differs considerably between Member States. In view of the exposure of energy-poor households to the negative impact of rising electricity prices, Member States should ensure that their definition of vulnerable consumer, pursuant to Article 28 of Directive (EU) 2019/944, encompasses energy-poor households, so that these households may benefit from public price interventions and from prohibition of disconnection in times of crisis.
Amendment 38 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 1 – point b
Article 1 – point b
(b) set fundamental principles for well- functioning, integrated electricity markets, which facilitate the achievement of the Union's 2030 reduction target for greenhouse gas emissions and 2050 climate neutrality objective pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, ensure the protection of vulnerable and energy-poor consumers from price shocks, allow for measures to alleviate energy poverty, allow all resource providers and electricity customers non-discriminatory market access, enable the development of forward electricity markets to allow suppliers and consumers to hedge or protect themselves against the risk of future volatility in electricity prices, empower consumers, ensure competitiveness on the global market, enhance flexibility through demand response, energy storage and other non- fossil flexibility solutions, ensure energy efficiency, facilitate aggregation of distributed demand and supply, and enable market and sectoral integration and market- based remuneration of electricity generated from renewable sources, including by small-scale renewable energy communities;
Amendment 80 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EU) 2019/943
Article 19(b) – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 19(b) – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) be designed so that the revenues collected when the market price is above the strike price are distributed to all finalhousehold and SME electricity customers based on their share of consumption (same cost / refund per MWh consumed);
Amendment 98 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive (EU) 2019/944
(c) energy poverty is increasing or the wider economy is being negatively affected by the increases in electricity prices.
Amendment 104 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive (EU) 2019/944
Article 66a – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 66a – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the price set for households only applies to at most 80% of median household consumption, or 100% for vulnerable consumers, and retains an incentive for demand reduction;
Amendment 4 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the TCA does not cover any decisions relating to equivalence in financial services, the adequacy of the UK data protection regime, free movement of people and services, or the UK’s sanitary and phytosanitary regime;
Amendment 6 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the automatic recognition of professional qualifications, such as for lawyers, accountants and actuaries no longer applies; whereas, instead, the agreement sets out a framework for cooperation between the EU and the UK on the recognition of professional qualifications, including the establishment of a dialogue to exchange information on recognition procedures and to develop guidelines for assessing qualifications; notes the particular problems that this creates on the island of Ireland;
Amendment 11 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. Whereas the absence of an agreement on free movement of people creates difficulties for the economy and the labour market on the island of Ireland, particularly in border areas;
Amendment 61 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises that the close economic links between Ireland and Northern Ireland will continue despite the latter being part of a designated third country; supports an acknowledgement of these economic links, including with respect to the supervision of transactions between both jurisdictions; calls for measures to ensure that such links are not disrupted by any changes in regulatory or legal frameworks; emphasises the importance of maintaining and further developing close economic ties and minimising disruption in the aftermath of Brexit, particularly with respect to this relationship;
Amendment 82 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Strongly reiterates the importance of protecting the Good Friday Agreement in its entirety and supporting peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland; recalls the UK Government’s threatened actions, which would be deemed to be in violation of the TCA, particularly with respect to the Northern Ireland Protocol as contained in the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill 2022, in which the UK Government proposed removing the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU over the Protocol, and for which the Commission commenced infringement proceedings against the UK; recognises that an agreement has been reached on the Windsor Framework[10] and that the British Government has announced its intention to suspend work on the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill and to allow it to lapse. _________________ 10 His Majesty’s Government, ‘The Windsor Framework: A new way forward’, February 2023; encourages the British government to take into consideration the specific circumstances of Northern Ireland in any new laws or regulations it proposes to introduce.
Amendment 6 #
2022/2182(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
Citation 21 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Youth Declaration , adopted by the UN DPI/NGO Conference on 22 - 23 August 2018,
Amendment 56 #
2022/2182(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights that the “generational renewal challenge” is particularly acute in those Member States that combine a lower than average share of young farmers with a higher than average share of farmers above retirement age, notably Ireland, Sweden, many countries in Southern Europe, and some in Eastern Europe;1a _________________ 1a European Commission, 'Commission Staff Working Document: Drivers of food security', 2023
Amendment 101 #
2022/2182(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Condemns land-grabs by corporate and muli-national entities in rural areas locking young people out of the agricultural sector and inhibiting generational renewal; Calls for Member States to introduce measures to improve land mobility and access to land for young farmers;
Amendment 125 #
2022/2182(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Regrets that young people in rural areas experience significant daily challenges, particularly as regards education, imposition of quotas on young farmers availing of grant aid support, lack of recognition or engagement by national authorities on farming succession schemes, access to quality jobs, social isolation, lack of public transport, lack of planning for the future of our rural communities informed by rural people, difficulties in accessing affordable housing, healthcare and digital connectivity, especially in remote and less developed rural regions that suffer from regional imbalance;
Amendment 168 #
2022/2182(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to assess facilitating collaborative farming arrangements such as long leases, share farming, and partnerships to provide opportunities for young farmers;
Amendment 179 #
2022/2182(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to provide access, in their advisory services, to a farm succession facilitator that can provide guidance during farm transfers, namely on intergenerational dialogue, legal and taxation frameworks and financial support possibilities; Notes that this is crucial towards the transfer of knowledge, skills, labour, management, control and ownership of the farm business between one generation and the next or successor generation;
Amendment 204 #
2022/2182(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses that taking land out of sustainable agricultural production may significantly worsen an already highly inflated land market which will have major consequences for land mobility and access to land for young farmers;
Amendment 304 #
2022/2182(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that corporate entities such as investment funds do not compete with young farmers for land, as such unfair competition and trading practices has a major impact on the viability of young and new entrant farmers; calls therefore on Member States with a poor track record in this regard to commit to achieving meaningful generational renewal and supporting young farmers to access land;
Amendment 14 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers the fact that recent supply chain disruption, notably caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian war against Ukraine, has highlighted the EU agricultural sector’s reliance on complex import and export chains; calls for a shift to a sustainable, resilient and fair agricultural model anchored in the EU territories and with the wellbeing of our primary producers at its centre;
Amendment 25 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that this moment should be used as an opportunity to reset supply chains, in a way that incorporates due diligence for responsible business conduct;
Amendment 27 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Believes that in situations where trade is taking place with third countries the carbon footprint of the food's journey should be minimised, through the thorough consideration of the mode of transport to be used;
Amendment 36 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that import dependency increases vulnerability to external shocks, as now observed in fuel, fertiliser and feed chains; calls for EU production to be recalibrated towards sustainable practices which reduce the need for inputs, for example by advancing IPM, and to focus primarily on EU demand for healthy food; calls on Member States to ensure greater farmer autonomy via the strategic plans, notably through strong support for organic production and the organic sector as a whole;
Amendment 49 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that localised, short supply chains contribute to the resilience of food supply chains overall, which ensures profitable paths for production and distribution; stresses that actors in such chains face specific challenges, such as weak access to government support; calls on Member States to provide strong support for cooperation measures under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development in order to expand the networks of small producers and increase their individual viability;
Amendment 52 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines the importance of the Directive on Unfair Trading Practices (UTPs) in regulating the relationship between producers and buyers; In this regard, calls for its principles to be built on to further regulate the relationship between third country suppliers and EU business buyers;
Amendment 57 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates that climate change and, biodiversity loss and civil discontent resulting from spiralling food prices pose a high risk of disrupting both primary production and logistics;
Amendment 66 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that the health and labour conditions of agri-food workers affect labour availability in the supply chain, therefore care for the wellbeing of these workers must be mainstreamed into all proposals for a sustainable supply chain;
Amendment 76 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need forto protect farmers through market regulation and appropriate public stocks to tackle market crises and price volatility, to secure supply and to prevent speculation; calls for market transparency and timely information on public and private stocks;
Amendment 85 #
2022/2040(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that EU engagement in global food governance must recognise and promote the right to food, as well as the food sovereignty of its trading partners and their right to regulate their exports and stocks to secure their own needs, as a failure to make this change in current and new trading agreements and relationships will perpetuate a clear imbalance in bargaining power between the EU and developing countries.
Amendment 2 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the key role that farmers and the agri-food sector have played during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite also facing huge hikes in input costs, in ensuring access to quality and affordable food, especially through short supply chains and trade in locally grown food;
Amendment 9 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Applauds the role played by migrant workers during the pandemic, who assisted our farmers in the labour intensive sectors of agriculture.
Amendment 13 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the importance of increasing the resilience of the EU agri- food system and equipping it with the necessary tools to face new crises, such as the war in Ukraine, by investing in research and innovation, digitalisation, marketing campaigns to grow the organics sector and the transition to more sustainable and territorially connected agriculture;
Amendment 28 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. CRecalls the positive impact the CAP has had on European regions over the last 60 years and calls on the Commission to enhance complementarity in the implementation of EU funds, particularly for cohesion and agriculture policy, by ensuring coordination, complementarity and coherence when it comes to rural development;
Amendment 47 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the importance of the agricultural sector for the creation of employment and for livelihoods in rural areas and the need to combat the abandonment of rural areas, which is particularly prominent in remote and mountainous regions owing to the low income and productivity potential of agricultural activities in theses areas, through policies and the allocation of the necessary funds, by creating and facilitating conditions favourable to job creation and attracting young people to rural areas, by reducing wage gaps between agriculture and other sectors, by increasing business competitiveness and improving quality of life by encouraging investments in infrastructure and services;
Amendment 53 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Highlights the important role played by LEADER in rural areas, in engaging local actors in the design and delivery of strategies, decision-making and resource allocation for the development of their rural areas.
Amendment 55 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Notes that less developed regions depend significantly more on agricultural employment and as a result feel a greater negative impact from economic restructuring and agricultural modernisation that requires less labour, therefore new opportunities must be explored to keep people in these areas, such as the development of rural tourism.
Amendment 56 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Notes that land abandonment can have a negative impact on biodiversity, where the practices engaged in by farmers have been maintaining high biodiversity habitats and landscape features.
Amendment 59 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to continue investing in the digital and green transitions, innovation and rural skills training in order to reduce the gaps between rural and urban areas and improve the attractiveness of rural areas overall, through for example the improvement of the provision of broadband connectivity.
Amendment 64 #
2022/2032(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Underlines the need to better study and adapt to the impact climate change is having on European regions, particularly the agricultural sector, as this presents a significant threat to the future of these regions.
Amendment 60 #
2022/0409(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation seeks tohall ensure full respect for the right of protection of personal data laid down in Article 8 of the Charter. In that regard, this Regulation strictly limits the amount of personal data that will be made available to the tax authorities. The processing of intra- Community transaction information pursuant to this Regulation should only occur for the purposes of this Regulation.
Amendment 97 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The difference between the “main VAT gap” and the “policy gap” should be consistently and clearly delineated with efforts focused on tackling the technical issue of the main VAT gap which is potentially caused by fraud or other issues such as bankruptcies.
Amendment 98 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) By its nature and due to technical limitations the calculation of any tax gap relies on a number of assumptions.
Amendment 109 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) For the VAT reporting system to be implemented in an efficient manner, it is necessary that the information reaches the tax administration without delay. Therefore, the deadline for the issuance of an invoice for cross-border transactions should be set at 25 working days after the chargeable event has taken place.
Amendment 193 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 5c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
With regard to instant credit transfers, a payer’s PSP shall verify free of charge to PSUs whether the payment account identifier and the name of the payee provided by the payer match. Where they do not match, that PSP shall notify the payer of any discrepancies detected and the degree of any such discrepancy.
Amendment 150 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 aims to ensure that Europe’s biodiversity will be put on the path to recovery by 2030 for the benefits of people, the planet, the climate, food sovereignty, and our economy. It sets out an ambitious EU nature restoration plan with a number of key commitments, including a commitment to put forward a proposal for legally binding EU nature restoration targets to restore degraded ecosystems, in particular those with the most potential to capture and store carbonacross all land types to achieve the greatest synergistic benefits, and to prevent and reduce the impact of natural disasters.
Amendment 186 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Geo-political developments have further underlined the need to safeguard the resilience of food systems.62 Evidence shows that restoring agro-ecosystems has positive impacts on food productivity in the long-term, and that the restoration of nature acts as an insurance policy to ensure the EU’s long-term sustainability and resilienceIt is important to strongly emphasise the need for actions to promote sustainable farming, hunting and forestry that supports the recovery of species and habitats, including pollinators and their habitats. The importance of supporting positive, resilient and sustainable agricultural production is also critical. In addition it is important that Member States, the Council, and Commission recognise that the viability of rural communities, resilience and productivity of food systems, food availability, healthy market conditions, competitivity, food affordability, and food sovereignty in the long-term is conditional on a healthy and functional biosphere, climate stability and water availability. _________________ 62 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European, Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Safeguarding food security and reinforcing the resilience of food systems, COM (2022) 133 final.
Amendment 215 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Deadlines should therefore be established for putting in place restoration measures within and beyond Natura 2000 sites, in order to gradually improve the condition of protected habitat types across the Union as well as to re-establish them until the favourable reference area needed to achieve favourable conservation status of those habitat types in the Union is reached. In advance of setting deadlines to meet targets and to ensure legal certainty for those affected Member States, the Commission and national governments should conduct an initial comprehensive ecological assessment to establish accurate baselines, propose a suite of measures that have been shown to achieve the desired results. Adequate resources should be mobilised so that sufficient funds are in place to support measures that are proposed to compensate and protect impacted agricultural landowners, hunters, farmers and foresters to both practically achieve nature restoration whilst safeguarding the socio-economic viability of rural communities. Achievable timelines should be set for delivering results and allow sufficient flexibility and adaptability in implementation in order to ensure the greatest environmental benefit. In order to give the necessary flexibility to Member States to put in place large scale restoration efforts, it is appropriate to group habitat types according to the ecosystem to which they belong and set the time-bound and quantified area-based targets for groups of habitat types. This will allow Member States to choose which habitats to restore first within the group.
Amendment 226 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a) It is critical for the success of any restoration program that sufficient funds are mobilised to underpin the economic viability of the landowners and communities affected in advance of any implementation; In light of the Commissions own estimation that for every €1 invested in nature restoration there is an economic return of €8 to €38, there is a legitimate expectation that those delivering the essential public goods will be adequately and fully remunerated for the services that they are providing for the benefit of wider society.
Amendment 227 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 b (new)
Recital 29 b (new)
(29b) Stresses that in order to get public “buy in” to new measures, the food sovereignty of local and regional areas is not undermined by the implementation of this regulation; reaffirms the fundamental human right of people to food, and the right of populations who in the past, provided for themselves and their region to continue to do so into the future.
Amendment 228 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 c (new)
Recital 29 c (new)
(29c) It will be necessary when calculating the remuneration due for the services provided, that the methodology goes beyond the narrow lens of “costs incurred and income forgone” by the farmer, as the socio-economic losses to the wider community can be much greater with the loss of both upstream and downstream economic activity in the local area.
Amendment 275 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
Recital 50
(50) Restoration measures need to be put in place to enhance the biodiversity of agricultural ecosystems across the Union, including in the areas not covered by habitat types that fall within the scope of Directive 92/43/EEC. In the absence of a common method for assessing the condition of agricultural ecosystems that would allow setting specific restoration targets for agricultural ecosystems, it is appropriate to set a general obligation to improve biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems and measure the fulfilment of that obligation on the basis of existing indicators. There is significant concern that landowners of agricultural ecosytems and farmers will be prevented from carrying out specific actions that will inhibit income and food production.
Amendment 300 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
Recital 54
(54) Restoration and rewetting79 of organic soils80 in agricultural use (i.e. under grassland and cropland use) constituting drained peatlands may help achieve significant biodiversity benefits, an important reduction of green-house gas emissions and other environmental benefits, while at the same time contributing to a diverse agricultural landscape if implemented correctly, however it can have a negative effect on biodiversity is not managed correctly through the destruction of existing habitats of ground nesting birds and small mammals. In addition the increased emissions of methane from rewetted peatland may negate partially or totally the reduction of CO2. Member States can choose from a wide range of restoration measures for drained peatlands in agricultural use spanning from converting cropland to permanent grassland and extensification measures accompanied by reduced drainage, to full rewetting with the opportunity of paludicultural use, or the establishment of peat-forming vegetation. In order for these far reaching measures to be accepted by the landowners it is vital that that proposed measures are “stress tested” and evaluated for their applicability and suitability in advance, through EIP pilot projects and impact assessments so the desired outcomes can be assured and to avoid the negative outcomes of the top down implementation of the past. The most significant climate benefits are created by restoring and rewetting cropland followed by the restoration of intensive grassland. To allow for a flexible implementation of the restoration target for drained peatlands under agricultural use Member States may count the restoration measures and rewetting of drained peatlands in areas of peat extraction sites as well as, to a certain extent, the restoration and rewetting of drained peatlands under other land uses (for example forest) as contributing to the achievement of the targets for drained peatlands under agricultural use. _________________ 79 Rewetting is the process of changing a drained soil into a wet soil. Chapter 1 of IPCC 2014, 2013 and Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands, Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Tanabe, K., Srivastava, N., Baasansuren, J., Fukuda, M. and Troxler, T.G. (eds). 80 The term ‘organic soil’ is defined in IPCC 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds).
Amendment 308 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
Recital 55
(55) In order to reap the full biodiversity benefits, restoration and rewetting of areas of drained peatland should extend beyond the areas of wetlands habitat types listed in Annex I of Directive 92/43/EEC that are to be restored and re-established. Data about the extent of organic soils as well as their greenhouse gas emissions and removals are monitored and made available by LULUCF sector reporting in national greenhouse gas inventories by Member States, submitted to the UNFCCC. Restored and rewetted peatlands can continue to be used productively in alternative ways. For example, paludiculture, the practice of farming on wet peatlands, can include cultivation of various types of reeds, certain forms of timber, blueberry and cranberry cultivation, sphagnum farming, and grazing with water buffaloes. Such practices should be based on the principles of sustainable management and aimed at enhancing biodiversity so that they can have a high value both financially and ecologically. Paludiculture can also be beneficial to several species which are endangered in the Union and can also facilitate the connectivity of wetland areas and of associated species populations in the Union. Funding for measures to restore and rewet drained peatlands and to compensate possible losses of income; Definitive clear adequate funding streams must be in place in advance of proposed measures being implemented, this can come from a wide range of sources, including expenditure under the Union budget and Union financing programmes.
Amendment 313 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
Recital 56
(56) The new EU Forest Strategy for 203081 outlined the need to restore forestthe biodiversity of forests, agroforests and urban woodlands. Forests and other wooded land cover over 43,5 % of the EU’s land space. Forests and agroforestry ecosystems that host rich biodiversity are vulnerable to climate change but are also a natural ally in adapting to and fighting climate change and climate-related risks, including through their carbon-stock and carbon-sink functions, and provide many other vital ecosystem services and benefits, such as the provision of timber and wood, food and other non-wood products, climate regulation, soil stabilisation and erosion control and the purification of air and water. _________________ 81 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. New EU Forest Strategy for 2030 (COM/2021/572 final).
Amendment 454 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
(15 a) Agroforestry systems are “land use systems where trees are grown in combination with agriculture on the same land” (Regulation 2022/2472 Article 2.9) and are further clarified in national CAP strategic plans;
Amendment 492 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article shall be based on the best available knowledge and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in Annex I, measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance including their typical species, as referred to in Article 1(e) of Directive 92/43/EEC, and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. A; areas where the habitat types listed in Annex I are in unknown condition shall be considered as not being in good conditiona comprehensive initial ecological assessment shall be carried to establish high resolutions baselines (using IACS/ LPIS) and to ensure the suitability of proposed measures.
Amendment 767 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
For organic soils in agricultural use constituting drained peatlands, Member States shall put in place restoration measures. Those measures shall be in place ; In order for these measures to achieve the desired outcomes they shall be stress tested and evaluated for their applicability and suitability in advance, through EIP pilot projects and impact assessments so as negative outcomes can be avoided; After demonstrating their suitability in advance these measures shall be in place on at least:
Amendment 782 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 30 % of such areas by 2030, of which at least a quarter shall be rewetted; Paludiculture systems;
Amendment 793 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 50 % of such areas by 2040, of which at least half shall be rewettedPaludiculture systems;
Amendment 807 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) 70 % of such areas by 2050, of which at least half shall be rewetted.Paludiculture systems;
Amendment 828 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Where applicable, in advance of imposing measures contained in this article on private property, Member States shall firstly use state owned land constituting of organic soils to contribute to achieving the respective targets referred to in the first subparagraph, points (a), (b) and (c)
Amendment 1130 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – title
Article 16 – title
16 AEnsuring a just transition and access to justice
Amendment 1134 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Member States shall ensure that members of the public, in accordance with national law, that have a sufficient interest or that maintain the impairment of a right, have access to a review procedure before a court of law, or an independent and impartial body established by law, to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of the national restoration plans and any failures to act of the competent authorities, regardless of the role members of the public have played during the process for preparing and establishing the national restoration plan.
Amendment 26 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council18 sets a binding Union target to reach a share of at least 32 % of energy from renewable sources in the Union's gross final consumption of energy by 2030. Under the Climate Target Plan19 , the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption would need to increase to 40% by 2030 in order to achieve the Union’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction target20 . In this context, the Commission proposed in July 2021, as part of the package delivering on the European Green Deal, to double the share of renewable energy in the energy mix in 2030 compared to 2020, to reach at least 40%. The REPowerEU Communication21 outlined a plan to make the EU independent from Russian fossil fuels well before the end of this decade. The Communication foresees front-loading of wind and solar energy, increasing the average deployment rate as well as additional renewable energy capacity by 2030 to accommodate for higher production of renewable hydrogen. It also invited the co-legislators to consider a higher or earlier target for renewable energy. In this context, it is appropriate to increase the Union renewable energy target up to 45to at least 50% in order to significantly accelerate the current pace of deployment of renewable energy, thereby speeding up the phase-out of EU’s dependence by increasing the availability of affordable, secure and sustainable energy in the Union. _________________ 18 Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82). 19 Communication from the Commission COM(2020) 562 final of 17.9.2020, Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition Investing in a climate-neutral future for the benefit of our people. 20 Point 3 of the Communication from the Commission COM(2020) 562 21 REPowerEU: Joint European Action for more affordable, secure and sustainable energy, COM(2022) 108 final (“REPower EU Communication”).
Amendment 38 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The provisions of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters23 (‘the Aarhus Convention’)¨ regarding access to information, public participation in decision-making, and access to justice in environmental matters, in particular the provisions relating to public participation and to access to justice remain applicable, where relevant. It follows that Member State plans on the designation of renewables go-to areas should be subject to public consultation. _________________ 23 Council Decision 2005/370/EC of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters (OJ L 124, 17.5.2005, p. 1).
Amendment 40 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The designation of renewables go- to areas should allow renewable energy plants, their grid connection as well as co- located energy storage facilities located in these areas to benefit from predictability and streamlined administrative procedures. In particular, projects located in renewable go-to areas should benefit from accelerated administrative procedures, including a tacit agreement in case of a lack of response by the competent authority on an administrative step by the established deadline, unless the specific project is subject to an environmental impact assessment. These projects should also benefit from clearly delimited deadlines and legal certainty as regards the expected outcome of the procedure. Following the application for projects in a renewables go- to area, Member States should carry out a fast screening of such applications with the aim to identify if any of such projects is highly likely to give rise to significant unforeseen adverse effects in view of the environmental sensitivity of the geographic area where they are located that were not identified during the environmental assessment of the plan or plans designating renewables go-to areas carried out in accordance with Directive 2001/42/EC. All projects located in renewables go-to areas should be deemed approved at the end of such screening process. Only if Member States have clear evidence to consider that a specific project is highly likely to give rise to such significant unforeseen adverse effects, Member States should, after motivating such decision, subject such project to an environmental assessment in accordance with Directive 2011/92/EC and, where relevant, Directive 92/43/EEC25 . Given the need to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy sources, such assessment should be carried out within six months. _________________ 25 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the convervation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992).
Amendment 46 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In addition to installing new renewable energy plants, repowering existing renewable energy plants has a significant potential to contribute to the achievement of the renewable energy targets. Since, usually, the existing renewable energy plants have been installed in sites with significant renewable energy resource potential, repowering can ensure the continued use of these sites while reducing the need to designate new sites for renewable energy projects. Repowering includes further benefits such as the existing grid connection, a likely higher degree of public acceptance and knowledge of environmental impacts. The repowering of renewable energy projects entails changes to or the extension of existing projects to different degrees. The permit-granting process, including environmental assessments and screening, for the repowering of renewable energy projects should be limited to the potential impacts resulting from the change or extension compared to the original project, including cumulative impacts.
Amendment 61 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall collectively ensure that the share of energy from renewable sources in the Union’s gross final consumption of energy in 2030 is at least 450%.
Amendment 66 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15b – paragraph 3
Article 15b – paragraph 3
(3) Member States shall favour multiple uses of the areas identified as a result of the obligation in paragraph 1. This shall include the use of land for multiple forms of renewable energy generation where geographic specificities permit.
Amendment 69 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 15c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
By [2 years after the entry into force], Member States shall adopt a plan or plans designating, within the areas referred to in Article 15b(1), renewables go-to areas for one or more types of renewable energy sources. The development of the plans shall be open to public consultation. In that plan or plans, Member States shall:
Amendment 81 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 16a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 16a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of such screening, the project developer shall provide information on the characteristics of the project, on its compliance with the rules and measures identified according to Article 15c (1), points (b) and (c), for the specific go-to area, on any additional measures adopted by the project and how these measures address environmental impacts. All such information provided by the project developer shall be made publicly accessible online by the competent authorities. Regional authorities, civil society, researchers and local representative organisations shall be facilitated to raise any concern of significant unforeseen adverse effects which the project could provoke, and those concerns shall be considered by the competent national authorities during the screening. Such screening shall be finalised within 30 days from the date of submission of the applications for new renewable energy plants, with the exception of applications for installations with an electrical capacity of less than 150 kW. For such installations and for new applications for the repowering of plants, the screening phase shall be finalized within 15 days.
Amendment 82 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 16a – paragraph 6
Article 16a – paragraph 6
(6) In the permit-granting process of the applications referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the lack of reply of the relevant administrative bodies within the established deadline shall result in the specific administrative steps to be considered as approved, except in those cases where the specific project is subject to an environmental impact assessment in accordance with paragraph 5. All resulting decisions will be publicly available.
Amendment 83 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 16b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 16b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall facilitate the repowering of projects located outside go- to areas by ensuring that, if an environmental assessment for a project is required under the Union environmental legislation, such assessment shall be limited to the potential impacts stemming from the change or extension compared to the original project, including cumulative impacts.
Amendment 87 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 9a – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 9a – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) by 31 December 2026, on all new public and commercial buildings with useful floor area larger than 250 square meters, including all new public buildings intended for residential use;
Amendment 90 #
2022/0160(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2010/31/EU
Article 9a – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 9a – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) by 31 December 20297, on all new residential buildings.
Amendment 13 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Within the framework of the internal market, in order to safeguard freedom of choice, a high degree of consumer protection in the area of financial services contracts concluded at a distance and off-premises is required in order to enhance consumer confidence in distance selling and off-premises sales.
Amendment 17 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Ensuring the samea high level of consumer protection across the internal market is best achieved through fullminimum harmonisation. Full hHarmonisation is necessary in order to ensure that all consumers in the Union enjoy a high and equivalent level of protection of their interests and to create a well-functioning internal market. Member States should therefore not be allowed to maintain or introduce national provisions other than those laid down in this Directive, with respect to aspects covered by the Directive, unless otherwise provided in this Directive. Where no such harmonised provisions exist, Member States should remain free to maintain or introduce national legislation.
Amendment 44 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Amendment 46 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 a (new)
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
Amendment 65 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 16a – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(g a) where relevant, information on the consequences of non-compliance with the commitments linked to the financial service such as late/missed payments;
Amendment 70 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 16a – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) notice of the possibility that other taxes and/or costs may exist that are not paid via the trader or imposed by him, their amount and the conditions under which they can fall due;
Amendment 77 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 1 – point v a (new)
Article 16a – paragraph 1 – point v a (new)
(v a) where applicable, a description of the comparable most basic product in terms of costs and risks offered by the trader that would appropriately meet the consumer’s needs;
Amendment 81 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 16a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 86 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 16a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where the consumer explicitly agrees to continue the telephone communications, by way of derogation from paragraph 1, only the information referred to in points (a), (f), (g), (ga) (new), (i), (n), and (p) of that paragraph needs to be provided.
Amendment 89 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 16a – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The trader shall provide the information referred to in paragraph 1 at least one day before the consumer is bound by any distance contract. Member States shall require that the trader sends a reminder, on a durable medium, to the consumer of the possibility to withdraw from the distance contract and of the procedure to follow for withdrawing, in accordance with Article 16b. That reminder shall be provided tot he consumer, at the latest, one day after the conclusion of the distance contract. The provision of the pre-contractual information shall oblige the creditor to maintain its terms and conditions for a minimum of 14 days from the date of receipt by the consumer
Amendment 96 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2011/83/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 16a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Except for the information referred to in paragraph 1, points (a), (f), (g), (ga) (new), (i), (n), and (p), the trader shall be permitted to layer the information where it is provided by electronic means.
Amendment 101 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/83/EU
Article 16a a (new)
Article 16a a (new)
Amendment 113 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 16b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, for distance contracts concluded by electronic means, the trader provides a possibility to use a withdrawal button in order to facilitate the consumer’s exercise of the right of withdrawal. Such button shall be clearly labelled with the words ‘Withdraw from Contract’ or a corresponding unambiguous formulation.
Amendment 116 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 16b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The withdrawal button shall be placed in a prominent manner and permanently available during the entire withdrawal period on the same electronic interface as the one used to conclude the distance contract. In addition, the trader may also provide the withdrawal button through another channel and directly and easily accessible on the website of the trader. Where a confirmation e-mail is sent after the conclusion of the contract, it shall also include the withdrawal button. In addition, the trader may also provide the withdrawal button through another channel. The activation of the withdrawal button shall require consumers to identify themselves and the contract they want to withdraw from. The consumer shall be asked subsequently to confirm the withdrawal from the contract with a button labelled “withdraw now”.
Amendment 121 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
Article 16b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
The trader shall ensure that the activation of the withdrawal „withdraw now” button results in an instant confirmation notice to the consumer that the right of withdrawal has been exercised, which shall include the date and time of the exercise of the right of withdrawal. Confirmation of the exercise of the right of withdrawal shall be provided by the trader to the consumer on a durable medium. The trader shall inform the consumer without delay: a) Whether the right of withdrawal is not applicable for the selected contract or; b) On further requirements to complete the withdrawal process such as sending back the purchased item followed by a confirmation once the process is completed
Amendment 131 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16d – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 16d – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the specific effects that the proposed contract may have on the consumer, including on their financial situation and the consequences of payment default or late payment by the consumer.
Amendment 140 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directriove 2011/83/EU
Article 16e a (new)
Article 16e a (new)
Amendment 143 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16e b (new)
Article 16e b (new)
Amendment 146 #
2022/0147(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/83/EU
Article 16e c (new)
Article 16e c (new)
Article 16e c Admission, registration and supervision of traders offering consumer financial services 1. Member States shall ensure that traders offering consumer financial services contracts concluded at a distance are subject to an adequate admission process and to registration and supervision arrangements set up by an independent competent authority. 2. The possibility to offer consumer financial services contracts concluded at a distance shall be restricted to those entities that have obtained the authorization referred to in Article 16h (1). The Commission shall regularly monitor and review the efficiency of the measures taken.
Amendment 223 #
2022/0089(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘producer group’ means any association, irrespective of its legal form, mainly composed of producers or processorsf a geographical indication, processors or operators involved in the production of the same product;
Amendment 296 #
2022/0089(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘recognised producer group’ means a formal association having legal personality and recognised by the competent national authorities as the sole group to act on behalf of all producerswhich represents producers of a geographical indication;
Amendment 582 #
2022/0089(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. With reference to the geographic indications for Irish Whiskey/Uisce Beatha Eireannach/Irish Whisky, Irish Cream and Irish Poitín/Irish Poteen, the provisions of Articles 32 and 33 shall apply to the geographical area referred to in the respective product specifications.
Amendment 32 #
2021/2229(INL)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Considers that, in order to address shortcomings in the Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol and to give effect to Article 2 of that Protocol, and in accordance with the Good Friday Agreement, the proposed allocation should include three observers elected in Northern Ireland by universal suffrage;
Amendment 77 #
2021/2208(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out the need for the European Commission to investigate the impact of EU milk powder sold in Africa, bulked up with vegetable fats including palm oil, is having on nutritional health, local farming incomes and deforestation;
Amendment 4 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
— having regard to the speech of Mr. Fabio Panetta Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at Columbia University. New York, 25 April 2022, “For a few cryptos more: the Wild West of crypto finance”,
Amendment 49 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the European Union and its single market must ensure an innovation- friendly environment for companies (namely small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and start-ups) regarding new technologies in the area of financial services and crypto-assets; whereas this main goal requires a strong commitment from Member States with policies, namely on taxation, that ensure a stable, clear and certain legal framework for businesses to thrive and contribute to economic growth; whereas, finally, this effort requires strong commitment tothat it safeguards citizens’ rights, as taxpayers and consumers of financial services;
Amendment 55 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
J a. Reminds that income paid in crypto-assets and gains made on them are, as a rule, taxable like any other income or gain and that crypto-assets held are liable for inclusion in the calculation of wealth taxes;
Amendment 59 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Recital J b (new)
J b. whereas according to some simulations by the European Commission, the revenue potential of taxing capital gains on bitcoin across the EU in 2020 alone would have amounted to about €900 million, or 0.3% of the total tax revenue from property taxation in the EU;
Amendment 66 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that adapting the IT capacities of tax authorities through new emerging technologies, such as potential distributed ledger technologies like blockchain or artificial intelligence, promises tomay foster intelligent, effective and efficient tax and administrative procedures, facilitate tax compliance by citizens and businesses, and increase the traceability and identification of taxable transactions in a globalised environment where cross- border transactions have increased;
Amendment 70 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the need to identify the best ways to use technology to strengthen the analytical capacity of tax administrations (through better data analysis), to standardise data to reduce administrative burdens on SMEs, to ensure that taxation better reflects the business environment in the digital age and at the same time guarantees high levels of data protection;
Amendment 90 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that crypto-assets must be subject to fair, transparent and effective taxation, in order to guarantee fair competition between businesses in the area of financial services; understands that decisions on the taxation of crypto-assets lie with Member States, according to the Treaties; stands for an innovation- friendly environment in the digital single market, where entrepreneurs, SMEs and start-ups can thrive, generate growth, create jobs and contribute to economic recovery through tax revenueffective taxation taking into account their negative externalities where they exist, in order to guarantee fair competition between businesses in the area of financial services;
Amendment 96 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Calls on Member States and the Commission to assess different types of taxes on crypto-assets as instruments to mitigate the negative externalities arising from the trade with crypto-assets;
Amendment 97 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Notes that some crypto-assets pride themselves on a high level of anonymity and secrecy that are fundamentally at odds with the needs of modern tax authorities to carry out their job; stresses therefore that the legal and political pressure should be placed on the providers of these crypto-assets to change and engage with tax authorities and not the other way around;
Amendment 130 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Points out that the crypto-asset landscape is global and requires an international approach; understands, in this regard, the need to further negotiate international instruments on the matter; calls, in this regard for crypto-assets to be included within the scope of the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) developed by the OECD in 2014;
Amendment 135 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14 b. Is strongly concerned about the extreme levels of energy expenditure and pollution arising from the use of crypto- assets; warns that the network of the market leader Bitcoin “consumes about 0.36 percent of the world’s electricity - comparable to the consumption of Belgium or Chile”2a; calls on Member States to consider the implementation of a “green tax” on crypto-assets to mitigate the ecological impact; calls on the Commission to present a proposal for an EU-wide framework for a “green tax” on crypto-assets; _________________ 2a International Monetary Fund, “Global Financial Stability Report: COVID-19, Crypto, and Climate: Navigating Challenging Transitions”, Oct 2021, p. 53, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/GFS R/Issues/2021/10/12/global-financial- stability-report-october-2021
Amendment 336 #
2021/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. Notes that the ECB is ‘reconsidering’ its policy of allowing the Chief Economist to make private phone calls following meetings where policy decisions are made; reiterates that this practice must end immediately as it lacks transparency and expresses concern more generally at the existence of engagements with private interests where policy is discussed;
Amendment 27 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses the need for the EU and Member States to work together to identify where increased direct shipping routes between island EU Member states, or territories, and Member States on the mainland may be advantageous, in particular in the context of Brexit;
Amendment 29 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Notes that direct shipping routes from the North of Ireland jurisdiction to mainland Europe could be helpful in ensuring the full implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement (Irish Protocol), as trade in this context is equivalent to intra-union trade;
Amendment 30 #
2021/2043(INI)
4 c. Highlights the need to focus investment on infrastructure, which would facilitate greater trade within the union, such as roads or improved lairage facilities, for capacity and animal welfare conditions, at ports that are used to transport live animals between Member States;
Amendment 31 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4 d. Recalls the need to strengthen rail links on the island of Ireland between the two jurisdictions, as the North of Ireland, by applying the Irish protocol, effectively is an end destination of intra EU trade;
Amendment 32 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 e (new)
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4 e. Recalls the importance of ensuring that COVID entry bans imposed on third countries do not affect the flow of goods from one Member State to another, in a situation where a third country is utilised in the transit route;
Amendment 33 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 f (new)
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4 f. Notes the importance of working with third countries that are commonly used as a transit route between Member States, to ensure EU freight passes without hindrance;
Amendment 34 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 g (new)
Paragraph 4 g (new)
4 g. Notes that the pandemic has led to additional trading disruption for EU countries, or territories, not connected to mainland Europe, therefore solutions to avoid this in future must be investigated;
Amendment 35 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 h (new)
Paragraph 4 h (new)
4 h. Recalls that the disjointed process of testing between Member States, for transiting truck drivers, led to significant delays at borders during the pandemic;
Amendment 36 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 i (new)
Paragraph 4 i (new)
4 i. Recalls the important role played by green lanes during the pandemic, in maintaining the smooth transport of food and medical equipment between EU Member States;
Amendment 37 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 j (new)
Paragraph 4 j (new)
4 j. Highlights the post Brexit difficulties faced by hauliers, using the British land-bridge, who are not permitted to complete transit procedures electronically, forcing them, on re-entry to the EU, to attempt to visit an infrequently open transit office, thereby causing significant delay to delivery times;
Amendment 38 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 k (new)
Paragraph 4 k (new)
4 k. Calls for the removal of the requirement by some Member States that EU hauliers using the British land-bridge pre-notify consignments of food, using the TRACES system, the fact other destination Member States do not require TRACES pre-notification illustrates it is not necessary;
Amendment 39 #
2021/2043(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 l (new)
Paragraph 4 l (new)
4 l. Calls on the Commission to ensure the TRACES NT export certification module is ready for use by September 2021, as failure to do this will lead to additional administration, costs and confusion for intra-union trade exporters;
Amendment 403 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
Recital 46
(46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs, for example with regard to the deployment of on-shore and off-shore wind installations.
Amendment 414 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46 a (new)
Recital 46 a (new)
(46a) Maritime seaports are clean energy hubs of the future and important facilitators of the energy transition across Europe. In their role as energy hubs, maritime seaports play a key role in realising the EU’s climate objectives for 2030 and 2050, as well as the ambitions outlined in the REPowerEU plan.
Amendment 415 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46 b (new)
Recital 46 b (new)
(46b) Maritime seaports increasingly take up new responsibilities and are involved in new services, such as sustainable energy production, research on the blue economy, and military mobility. In their role as multi-service actors, maritime seaports can substantially contribute to a sustainable, digital and resilient European economy.
Amendment 1124 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 24 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. A maritime port shallIn order to be part of the comprehensive network where, a maritime port shall meet at least one of the following conditions is met:
Amendment 1141 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. It is considered by its Member State as a critical node for the supply of renewable energy in the EU and is considered to be instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU.
Amendment 1146 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4 b (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. The total annual wind energy volume, derived from both onshore and offshore wind, imported through the maritime port exceeds 0.1% of the total annual wind energy deployed by the Union. The reference amount for this volume is the latest available five-year average, based on the statistics published by Eurostat.
Amendment 1640 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 6/23
Annex 1 – part 6/23
Add the following to the core network: - Limerick – Galway – Sligo - Letterkenny rail freight line (Conventional/New Construction)
Amendment 1641 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 7/23
Annex 1 – part 7/23
Add the following to the core network: - Limerick Junction – Limerick -Galway- Sligo-Letterkenny rail passenger line (Conventional/New Construction railway) - Cork – Limerick – Galway – Sligo- Letterkenny Motorway
Amendment 1734 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Node name: Galway Maritime port: Core
Amendment 1735 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Node name: Killybegs Maritime port: Core
Amendment 1736 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Node name: Sligo Maritime port: Core
Amendment 1737 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Node name: Carraig Fhiáin/Carrickfin Airport: comprehensivre (Dúnnan Gall/ Donegal)
Amendment 1738 #
2021/0420(COD)
Node name: An Cnoc/Knock Airport: comprehensivre (Cúige Chonnacht/Connaught)
Amendment 1739 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Annex 2 - table - section IE
Node name: Luimeneach/Limerick Airport: comprehensivre (Sionainn/Shannon)
Amendment 1791 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 3 - part 3/14
Annex 3 - part 3/14
Add the following to the corridor North Sea – Alpine: - Cork-Limerick-Galway-Sligo- Letterkenny motorway - Limerick – Galway – Sligo - Letterkenny rail freight line - Port of Sligo - Port of Galway - Port of Killybegs
Amendment 1792 #
2021/0420(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 3 - part 4/14
Annex 3 - part 4/14
Add the following to the corridor North Sea – Alpine: - Limerick Junction – Limerick -Galway- -Sligo-Letterkenny rail passengers line - Ireland West Airport Knock - Shannon Airport - Donegal Airport
Amendment 30 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
Amendment 33 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Union imported and consumed one third of the globally traded agricultural products associated with deforestation between 1990 and 2008. Over that period, Union consumption was responsible for 10% of worldwide deforestation associated with the production of goods or services. Even if the relative share of EU consumption is decreasing, EU consumption is a disproportionally large driver of deforestation. The Union's impact on deforestation also comes from financial sector funding. EU- based financial institutions lent $34.7 billion to the world's top deforesting companies between 2016 and 2020, earning over €400 million in proceeds directly from the destruction of forests.2a The Union should therefore take action to minimise global deforestation and forest degradation driven by its consumption of certain commodities and products, and by the lending of EU-based financial institutions, and thereby seek to reduce its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and global biodiversity loss as well as promote sustainable production and consumption patterns in the Union and globally. To have the greatest impact, Union policy should aim at influencing the global market, not only supply chains to the Union. Partnerships and efficient international cooperation with producer and consumer countries are fundamental in that respect. _________________ 2a Global Witness (October 2021) Deforestation Dividends. How global banks profit from rainforest destruction and human rights abuses.
Amendment 37 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation also follows the Commission’s Communication on “An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy”38 which stated that with new internal and external challenges and more particularly a new, more sustainable growth model as defined by the European Green Deal and the European Digital Strategy, the EU needs a new trade policy strategy –one that will support achieving its domestic and external policy objectives and promote greater sustainability and uphold human rights in line with its commitment of fully implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Trade policy must play its full role in the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and in the green and digital transformations of the economy and towards building a more resilient Europe in the world. _________________ 38 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European, Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Trade Policy Review - An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy, COM(2021) 66 final, 18 February 2021.
Amendment 40 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The Commission should continue to work in partnership with producer countries, and more generally in cooperation with international organisations, local civil society and bodies, and should be reinforcing its support and incentives with regard to protecting forests and transition to deforestation-free production, acknowledging the role of indigenous people, improving governance and land tenure, increasing law enforcement and promoting sustainable forest management, climate-resilient agriculture, sustainable intensification and diversification, agro- ecology and agroforestry. In doing so it should acknowledge the role of indigenous people in protecting forests. Building upon the experience and lessons learned in the context of the already existing initiatives, the Union and the Member States should work in partnership with producer countries, upon their request, to exploit the multi-functionalities of forest, support them in the transition to sustainable forest management, and address global challenges while meeting local needs and paying attention to the challenges faced by smallholders in line with the Communication to Stepping up Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests. The partnership approach should help producer countries in protecting, restoring and sustainably using forest, hence contributing to the objective of this Regulation to reduce deforestation and forest degradation.
Amendment 46 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) To strengthen the Union’s contribution to halting deforestation and, forest degradation and human rights abuses, and to ensure that commodities and products from supply chains related to deforestation and, forest degradation and human rights abuses are not placed on the Union market, relevant commodities and products should not be placed or made available on the Union market, nor exported from the Union market unless they are deforestation-free and have been produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of production, international human rights laws and the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples. To confirm that this is the case, they should always be accompanied by a due diligence statement.
Amendment 48 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) On the basis of a systemic approach, operators should take the appropriate steps in order to ascertain that the relevant commodities and products that they intend to place on the Union market comply with the deforestation-free, human rights and legality requirements of this Regulation. To that end, operators should establish and implement due diligence procedures. The due diligence procedure required by this Regulation should include three elements: information requirements, risk assessment and risk mitigation measures. The due diligence procedures should be designed to provide access to information about the sources and suppliers of the commodities and products being placed on the Union market, including information demonstrating that the absence of deforestation and forest degradation and legality requirements are fulfilled, inter alia by identifying the country and area of production, including geo-location coordinates of relevant plots of land. These geo-location coordinates that rely on timing, positioning and/or Earth observation could make use of space data and services delivered under the Union’s Space programme (EGNOS/Galileo and Copernicus). On the basis of this information, operators should carry out a risk assessment. Where a risk is identified, operators should mitigate such risk to achieve no or negligible risk. Only after completing the required steps of the due diligence procedure and concluding that no or negligible risk exists that the relevant commodity or product is not compliant with this Regulation, should the operator be allowed to place the relevant commodity or product on the Union market or to export it.
Amendment 50 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) For this reason, the Commission should assess the deforestation and forest degradation risk, and the risk of violations of human rights, at a level of a country or parts thereof based on a range of criteria that reflect both quantitative, objective and internationally recognised data, and indications that the countries are actively engaged in fighting deforestation and forest degradation. This benchmarking information should make it easier for operators in the Union to exercise due diligence and for competent authorities to monitor and enforce compliance, while also providing an incentive for producer countries to increase the sustainability of their agricultural production systems and reduce their deforestation impact. This should help making supply chains more transparent and sustainable. This benchmarking system should be based on a three-tier classification of countries to be regarded as low, standard or high risk. In order to ensure appropriate transparency and clarity, the Commission should in particular make publicly available the data being used for benchmarking, the reasons for the proposed change of classification and the reply of the country concerned. For relevant commodities and products from low risk countries or parts of countries identified as low-risk, operators should be allowed to apply a simplified due diligence, whilst competent authorities should be required to apply enhanced scrutiny on relevant commodities and products from high risk countries or parts of countries identified as high-risk. The Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing measures to establish the countries or parts thereof that present a low or high risk of producing relevant commodities and products that are not compliant with this Regulation.
Amendment 67 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘deforestation’ means the conversion of forest to agricultural or other use, whether human-induced or not;
Amendment 109 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) they have been produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of production and without any violation of human rights along the supply chain; and
Amendment 121 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6 a Obligations of regulated financial undertakings 1. Regulated financial undertakings that provide financial services to operators who are subject to this Regulation shall be subject to the obligations and provisions in Article 4, 5 and 8 to 12 of this Regulation, with regard to financial services related to the making available of the relevant commodities and relevant products in the Union market. When complying with the information gathering requirement under Article 9, regulated financial undertakings may rely on the information gathered for the same purpose by the operator to whom they are providing the financial service, complemented by other information sources. When completing the risk assessment under Article 10, regulated financial undertakings will perform the risk assessment independently of the operator to whom they are providing a financial service. 2. Paragraph 1 of this article shall also apply to regulated financial undertakings providing financial services to traders that are not SMEs who are subject to this Regulation, with regard to financial services related to the making available of the relevant commodities and relevant products on the EU market.
Amendment 136 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) adequate and verifiable information that the production has been conducted in accordance with relevant legislation of the country of production, including any arrangement conferring the right to use the respective area for the purposes of the production of the relevant commodity, and ensuring that the rights of indigenous peoples to Free, Prior and Informed Consent are respected;
Amendment 152 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) concerns in relation to other actors involved in the supply chain, particularly in relation to legal complaints taken against an actor, substantiated concerns relating to deforestation, forest degradation, human rights abuses or attacks against environmental and land rights defenders committed by an actor, or the inclusion of an actor on any United Nations list of companies and businesses involved in violations of human rights or international law;
Amendment 156 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point i
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) substantiated concerns submitted under Article 29, paying particular attention to reports by civil society;
Amendment 167 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Unless otherwise provided by other EU legislative instruments that lay down requirements regarding sustainability value chain due diligence, operators which are not SMEs shall, on an annual basis, publicly report as widely as possible, including on the internet, on their due diligence system including on the steps taken by them to implement their obligations as set out in Article 8information about the products and commodities placed on the market, the place of production or origin of the commodities, the structure of the supply chain, the potential risks of non-compliance that were detected, and the steps taken to mitigate those risks. Operators falling also within the scope of other EU legislative instruments that lay down requirements regarding value chain due diligence may fulfil their reporting obligations under this paragraph by including the required information when reporting in the context of other EU legislative instruments.
Amendment 170 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. When placing relevant commodities or products on the Union market or exporting them from it, operators are not required to fulfil the obligations under Article 10 where they can ascertain that all relevant commodities and products have been produced in countries or parts thereof that were identified as low risk in accordance with Article 27, except where a risk of mixing with products of unknown origin or substantiated concerns submitted under Article 29 have been identified in accordance with points (g) and (i) respectively of paragraph 2 in Article 10.
Amendment 178 #
2021/0366(COD)
3. To carry out the checks referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authorities shall establish a plan based on a risk-based approach. The plan shall contain at least risk criteria to carry out the risk analysis under paragraph 4 and thereby inform the decisions on checks. In establishing and reviewing the risk criteria, the competent authorities shall take into account in particular the assignment of risk to countries or parts thereof in accordance with Article 27, the history of compliance of an operator or trader with this Regulation and any other relevant information, such as reports by civil society. Based on the results of the checks and the experience on implementation of the plans, the competent authorities shall review those plans and risk criteria on a regular basis in order to improve their effectiveness. When reviewing the plans, the competent authorities shall establish a reduced frequency of checks for those operators and traders who have shown a consistent record of full compliance with the requirements under this Regulation.
Amendment 179 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 7
Article 14 – paragraph 7
7. The suspensions referred to in paragraph 6 shall end within 37 working days unless the competent authorities, based on the result of the checks conducted within that period, conclude that they require additional time to establish whether the relevant commodities and products comply with the requirements of this Regulation. In such case, the competent authorities shall extend the period of suspension by means of additional interim measures taken under Article 21 or, in the case of relevant commodities or products entering or leaving the Union market, by notifying the customs authorities of the need to maintain the suspension under Article 24(6).
Amendment 180 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 8
Article 14 – paragraph 8
8. Competent authorities shall exchange information on and coordinate the development and application of the risk criteria referred to in paragraph 3 with competent authorities of other Member States and with the Commission, in order to improve the effectiveness of the enforcement of this Regulation and highlight situations that may be of a scale to cause an imbalance in EU agricultural markets.
Amendment 183 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 9
Article 14 – paragraph 9
9. Each Member State shall ensure that the annual checks carried out by their competent authorities cover at least 5% of the operators placing, making available on or exporting from the Union market each of the relevant commodities on their market as well as 58% of the quantity of each of the relevant commodities placed or made available on or exported from their market.
Amendment 184 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 11
Article 14 – paragraph 11
11. Without prejudice to the checks under paragraphs 5 and 6, competent authorities shall conduct checks referred to in paragraph 1 when they are in possession of evidence or other relevant information, including based on substantiated concerns provided by third parties, such as civil society, under Article 29, concerning potential non-compliance with this Regulation.
Amendment 189 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) spot checks, including field audits, including where appropriate in third countries through cooperation with the administrative authorities of third countries and civil society.
Amendment 190 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where appropriate, spot checks, including field audits.
Amendment 196 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. 3. In the case of soya, the Commission shall publish a strategy on how to remove soya, when it is produced as a result of deforestation, from the EU market, while guaranteeing little or no disruption to animal feedstocks in the EU; said report may investigate whether a phased removal from the market, rather than immediate ban, is appropriate. This is important because the EU’s self- sufficiency rate for soya is 5 %, and as a consequence, the EU imports annually around 13 million tonnes of soya, mainly from Brazil, Argentina and the USA.
Amendment 199 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Where relevant commodities or products were produced in a country or part thereof listed as high risk in accordance with Article 27, or there is a risk of relevant commodities or products produced in such countries or parts thereof entering the relevant supply chain, each Member State shall ensure that the annual checks carried out by their competent authorities cover at least 1520% of the operators placing, making available on or exporting from the Union market each of the relevant commodities on their market as well as 1520% of the quantity of each of the relevant commodities placed or made available on or exported from their market from high risk countries or parts thereof.
Amendment 210 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) fines proportionate to the environmental damage and the value of the relevant commodities or products concerned, calculating the level of such fines in such way as to make sure that they effectively deprive those responsible of the economic benefits derived from their infringements, and gradually increasing the level of such fines for repeated infringements; the maximum amount of such fines shall be at least 410 % of the operators or trader’s annual turnover in the Member State or Member States concerned;
Amendment 222 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Partnerships and cooperation should allowall be encouraged, to ensure the full participation of all stakeholders, including civil society, indigenous people, local communities and the private sector including, SMEs and smallholders.
Amendment 234 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. Any natural or legal person having sufficient interest, including those having submitted substantiated concern in accordance with Article 29 and in particular civil society working in the area, shall have access to a court or other independent and impartial public body competent to review the procedural and substantive legality of the decisions, acts or failure to act of the competent authority under this Regulation.
Amendment 235 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 237 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. No later than two years after the entry into force, the Commission shall carry out a first review of this Regulation, and shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal. The report shall focus in particular on an evaluation of the need and the feasibility of extending the scope of this Regulation to other ecosystems, including land with high carbon stocks and land with a high biodiversity value such as grasslands, peatlands and wetlands and further commodities, while ensuring a consistency with how such areas are treated within the union.
Amendment 238 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the need for and feasibility of additional trade facilitation tools to support the achievement of the objectives of the Regulation including through recognition of certification schemes;
Amendment 239 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the impact of the Regulation on farmers, in particular smallholders, indigenous peoples and local communities and the possiblelikely need for additional support for the transition to sustainable supply chains.
Amendment 37 #
2021/0296(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2 a) The global financial crisis also showed the need for an EU wide harmonised Insurance Guarantee Scheme to protect consumers and ensure a level playing field. The completion of such a scheme should be considered a priority for the Union.
Amendment 228 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) Member States could make insurance undertakings that are excluded from the scope of Directive 2009/138/EC subject to provisions that are similar or identical to the ones provided for in that Directive.
Amendment 234 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Reporting and disclosure deadlines should be clearly laid down in Directive 2009/138/EC. However, it should be recognised that extraordinary circumstances such as sanitary emergencies, natural catastrophes and other extreme events could make it impossible for insurance and reinsurance undertakings to submit such reports and disclosures, within the established deadlines. To this end, the CommissionEIOPA should be empowered to extend the deadlines under such circumstances.
Amendment 245 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Directive 2009/138/EC requires insurance and reinsurance undertakings to have, as an integrated part of their business strategy, a periodic own-risk and solvency assessment. Some risks, such as climate change risks, are difficult to quantify or they materialise over a period that is longer than the one used for the calibration of the Solvency Capital Requirement. Those risks can be better taken into account in the own-risk and solvency assessment. Where iInsurance and reinsurance undertakings have material exposure to climate risks, they should be required to carry out, within appropriate intervals and as part of the own-risk and solvency assessment, analyses of the impact of long-term climate change risk scenarios on their business, except when the undertaking can prove that it has no material exposure to climate change risks. Such analyses should be proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in the business of the undertakings. In particular, while the assessment of the materiality of exposure to climate risks should be required from all insurance and reinsurance undertakings, long-term climate scenario analyses should not be required for low- risk profile undertakings.
Amendment 252 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) The burden of the auditing requirement does not seem to be justified for low-risk profile undertakings, which are not expected to be relevant for the financial stability of the Union and whose policyholders are not numerous. One of the criteria that low-risk profile undertakings are required to meet is that they be small in size. To alleviate this burden, an exclusion from this requirement should be granted. However, as some Member States have already implemented audit requirements encompassing all undertakings and other parts of the solvency and financial condition report, they should have the possibility to apply auditing to all undertakings and other parts of the solvency and financial condition report.
Amendment 306 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – points a and b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – points a and b
Amendment 315 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(2a) in Article 4(1), the following subparagraph is added: 'Member States may define a threshold different to that laid down in point (a) of the first subparagraph if that different threshold applies to a material number of insurance and reinsurance undertakings with low risk profile and representing a residual market share. Such a threshold shall not exceed EUR 25 000 000.';
Amendment 319 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 10a a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 10a a (new)
(10aa) ‘significant cross-border activities’ means insurance and reinsurance activities carried out by an insurance or reinsurance undertaking under the right of establishment and those carried out under the freedom to provide services in a given host Member State, which has been identified by the relevant supervisory authority of the home Member State and the supervisory authorities of any Member State the undertaking intends to carry-out its business on the basis of its nature, scale and complexity of risk inherent in the business model and pursuant to Article 26(5);
Amendment 324 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 a (new)
(41a) 'science-based target' means a target defined on the basis of conclusive scientific evidence and with independent scientific validation, that when achieved by the undertaking ensures that the undertaking's impacts on sustainability matters, as referred to in Articles 132 and 44(2), will be aligned with the sustainability goals and criteria of the European Union for the specific sustainability matters;
Amendment 330 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 b (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 b (new)
(41b) 'climate neutrality' shall be read in accordance with Article 2(1) of the Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 ("European Climate Law");
Amendment 333 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 c (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 c (new)
Amendment 337 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Directive 2009/128/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 d (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 d (new)
Amendment 340 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 e (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 e (new)
(41e) 'sustainability factors' means sustainability factors as defined in Article 2, point (24) of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a; __________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability- related disclosures in the financial services sector
Amendment 342 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 f (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 f (new)
(41f) 'transition plan' is the plan of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking to ensure that its business model and strategy are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy and with the goals of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot, including plans to address the greenhouse gas emissions associated directly or indirectly with its asset and insurance portfolios;
Amendment 344 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point i
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 g (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point 41 g (new)
(41g) 'stewardship' is the engagement strategy of the insurance or reinsurance undertaking to steer the activities of the assets it holds, as its shareholders' rights allow, and to influence the strategy and business of the firms in which it invests, in order to progress towards sustainable economic activities and towards a more positive impact on sustainability factors;
Amendment 349 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/13/8/EC
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Article 26 – paragraph 4
4. Where several supervisory authorities need to be consulted pursuant to paragraph 1, any supervisory authority concerned may request additional information from the supervisory authority of the home Member State to jointly assess the application for authorisation. The supervisory authority of the home Member State shall consider the conclusions of the joint assessment when taking its final decision and report the outcome and reason for its decision to all supervisory authorities consulted pursuant to paragraph 1 and to EIOPA.;
Amendment 350 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 26 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The supervisory authority of the home Member State shall assess the nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in the business model of the insurance undertaking for any of the markets in which the insurance undertaking seeks authorisation for carrying out its business. The home Member State may consult with the relevant supervisory authority of host Member States and shall inform the relevant supervisory authority and EIOPA about the conclusion of this assessment. Where the relevant supervisory authority disagrees with the assessment, EIOPA may, at the request of any relevant supervisory authority, assist the supervisory authorities in reaching an agreement.
Amendment 383 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
3. The supervisory authority may oppose the classification as low-risk profile undertaking within one month of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article on grounds related exclusively to the non-compliance with the conditions foreseen under Article 29a. A decision of the supervisory authority to oppose to the classification shall be done in writing and state the reasons of the supervisory authority’s disagreement. Absent such decision, the insurance undertaking shall not be classified as low- risk profile undertaking as of the end of the one month opposition period or an earlier date where the supervisory authority has issued a decision earlier confirming compliance with criteria.
Amendment 389 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 29c – paragraph 2
Article 29c – paragraph 2
2. Where the supervisory authority has serious concerns in relation to the risk profile of a low-risk profile undertaking, the supervisory authority may, in exceptional circumstances,shall request the undertaking concerned to refrain from using one or several proportionality measures listed in paragraph 1 provided this is justified in writing on consideration of the impact on the organisation of the undertaking and the specificities or change of its risk profile.
Amendment 405 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
3. For the purpose of this Article, ‘significant cross-border activities’ are insurance and reinsurance activities carried out by an insurance or reinsurance undertaking under the right of establishment and those carried out under the freedom to provide services in a given host Member State, which exceed 5 % of the annual grossere these activities are of relevance written premium of the undertaking, measured with reference to the last available financial statement of the undertaking.;h respect to the host Member State’s market, in particular when the activities are considered as relevant by the supervisory authority of the host Member State.
Amendment 418 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 35a – paragraph 2
Article 35a – paragraph 2
Amendment 423 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 35b – paragraph 4
Article 35b – paragraph 4
4. The Commission may adopt delegated acts Without prejudice to the powers of EIOPA under Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010, EIOPA may, at the request of one or several national supervisory authorities or on its own initiative, declare operations-disrupting events as exceptional. An operations- disrupting event may only be declared as exceptional if it is caused by a sanitary emergency, a natural catastrophe or another extreme event and if it affects materially the operational capabilities of insurance and reinsurance undertakings representing accordance with Article 301a to change significant share of the market or of the affected lines of business in one or several Member States. Where EIOPA has declared an operations-disrupting event as exceptional, the national supervisory authorities concerned may, within 3 months following the declaration, temporarily extend, for affected undertakings, the deadlines laid downreferred to in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 of this Article, provided that the change is necessary due to sanitary emergencies, natural catastrophes or other extreme events.; or 3 by up to 10 weeks. Based on the declaration by EIOPA of an operations-disrupting event as exceptional, the national supervisory authorities concerned may, where necessary, extend those deadlines for reporting obligations which are due within 6 months from the declaration by EIOPA. Where the affected undertakings are part of a group to which group supervision applies in accordance with Article 213(2), national supervisory authorities shall inform without delay the group supervisor of this extension.
Amendment 430 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point a
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall set individual quantitative objectives in view of improving gender-balanced representation of both sexes within their governance structures.
Amendment 431 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point b
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 41 – paragraph 2a – subparagraph 2
Article 41 – paragraph 2a – subparagraph 2
Amendment 435 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 41 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 41 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall have written policies in relation to at least risk management, internal control, internal audit, remuneration and pay transparency, stewardship, and, where relevant, outsourcing. They shall ensure that those policies are implementedhave a written transition plan, as described in Article 44a. They shall ensure that those policies and the transition plan are implemented. Policies shall integrate sustainability risk.
Amendment 448 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point - a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point - a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point a
(-a) paragraph 1, point (a) is replaced by the following: "(a) their professional qualifications, knowledge and experience, including in the field of sustainability risk, are adequate to enable sound and prudent management (fit); and (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02009L0138-20210630)" Or. en
Amendment 449 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point - a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 – point - a a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 42 – paragraph 2
Article 42 – paragraph 2
(-aa) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall notify the supervisory authority of any changes to the identity of the persons who effectively run the undertaking or are responsible for other key functions, along with the reasons for the changes and all information needed to assess whether any new persons appointed to manage the undertaking are fit and proper. (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02009L0138-20210630)" Or. en
Amendment 455 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point b – point i a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point b – point i a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 44 – paragraph 2a – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 44 – paragraph 2a – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(i a) the following subparagraph is inserted after the first subparagraph: "As regards underwriting, reserving and investment, insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall perform a regular assessment and ensure that their business strategy and activities for underwriting and their whole portfolio of assets are aligned with the objective of achieving climate neutrality in the EU by 2050 at the latest, as set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 ("European Climate Law").";
Amendment 468 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point b a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 44 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 44 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(ba) the following paragraph is added: "5a. The written policy on remuneration referred to at Article 41(3) shall promote sound and effective risk management in line with the written policy on risk management referred to in Article 41(3), including in relation to sustainability risks and the adverse impacts of the insurance or reinsurance undertaking on sustainability factors. Where an undertaking's remuneration schemes include both fixed and variable components, the variable remuneration component should be not less than 50 percentage points linked to the achievement of the targets set as part of the transition plan of the undertaking, as referred to in Article 44a."
Amendment 471 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 44 a (new)
Article 44 a (new)
Amendment 480 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point a
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point e
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point e
(e) consideration and analysis of the activities of the undertaking that may affect the macroeconomic and financial markets’ developments, and have the potential to turn into sources of systemic risk. This analysis consider the cumulative effect of its activities when combined with similar actions by other undertakings;
Amendment 483 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point b
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 45 – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 1 – point e
Article 45 – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) climate change, biodiversity loss, pandemics, other mass-scale events and other catastrophes, which may affect insurance and reinsurance undertakings.
Amendment 488 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 24 – point b a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 45 – paragraph 2
Article 45 – paragraph 2
(ba) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a), the undertaking concerned shall have in place processes which are proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in its business and which enable it to properly identify and assess the risks it faces in the short and long term and to which it is or could be exposed. The undertaking shall demonstrate the methods used in that assessment. (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02009L0138-20210630), including sustainability risks, and its own principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors. The undertaking shall demonstrate the methods used in that assessment. " Or. en
Amendment 493 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 45a – paragraph 1
Article 45a – paragraph 1
1. For the purposes of the identification and assessment of risks referred to in Article 45(2), the undertaking concerned shall also assess whether it has anspecify material exposure to climate change risks. The undertaking shall demonstrate the materiality of its exposure to climate change risks in the assessment referred to in Article 45(1) least three long- term climate scenarios.
Amendment 496 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 45a – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 45a – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. WThere the undertaking concerned has material exposure to climate change risks, the undertaking shall specify at least two long-term climate change scenarios, long-term climate change scenarios referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover a modelling period of at least 30 years and shall includinge the following scenarios:
Amendment 497 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 45a – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 45a – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) a long-term 'orderly transition' climate change scenario where the global temperature increase remainsclimate change policies are introduced early and become gradually more stringent, resulting in global greenhouse gas emissions reaching net-zero by 2050 and limiting the global temperature increase to below two degrees Celsius;
Amendment 500 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2009/139/EC
Article 45a – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 45a – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) a long-term 'disorderly transition' climate change scenario where the global temperature increase is equal to or higher thanclimate policies are delayed or divergent, resulting in later and sharper global greenhouse gas emission reductions, with the global temperature increase remaining below two degrees Celsius.;
Amendment 503 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 45a – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 45a – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) a long-term climate change scenario where the global temperature increase is equal to or higher than two degrees Celsius.
Amendment 507 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 45a – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 45a – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4, insurance undertakings that can demonstrate the they do not have any material exposure to climate change risks shall neither be required to specify climate change scenarios nor to assess their impact on the business of the undertaking.
Amendment 509 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25 a (new)
Directive 2009/128/EC
Article 50 – paragraph 1
Article 50 – paragraph 1
(25a) paragraph 1 of Article 50 is replaced by the following: "1. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 301a to further specify the following: (a) the elements of the systems referred to in Articles 41, 44, 46 and 47, and in particular the areas to be covered by the asset–liability management and investment policy, as referred to in Article 44(2), of insurance and reinsurance undertakings; (b) the functions referred to in Articles 44, 46, 47 and 48. (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02009L0138-20210630); (c) minimum standards and reference methodologies for the transition plans referred to in Article 44a; (d) specific, measurable targets based on scientific evidence, referred to in Article 44a and set out in Article 13; (e) minimum standards and reference methodologies on how insurance and reinsurance undertakings should integrate sustainability risks and adverse impacts on sustainability factors into their risk management systems in accordance with Article 44, including in relation to the types of sustainability risks and sustainability factors that should be considered by insurance and reinsurance undertakings and processes for identifying and managing adverse impacts on sustainability factors. The Commission shall, at least every three years after its date of application, review any delegated act adopted pursuant to points (c) and (d) of this paragraph, taking into consideration the technical advice of the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG). Where necessary, the Commission shall amend such delegated acts to take into account relevant developments, including developments with regard to international standards for transition plans and science-based targets. 1a. When adopting delegated acts pursuant to paragraph 1 points (c) and (d), the Commission shall take account of the sustainability reporting standards adopted in accordance with the Directive 2014/95/EU. " Or. en
Amendment 515 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point b
Directive 2009/128/EC
Article 51 – paragraph 1a – point b
Article 51 – paragraph 1a – point b
(b) a brief description of the capital management and the risk profile of the undertaking., including in relation to sustainability risks and the principal adverse impacts of the insurance or reinsurance undertaking on sustainability factors, and with reference to how the undertaking's stewardship policy has contributed to addressing these impacts;
Amendment 520 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point b
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 51 – paragraph 1a – point b a (new)
Article 51 – paragraph 1a – point b a (new)
(b a) where the undertaking conducts a climate change scenario analysis, a description of the results of the latest climate change scenario analysis as described in Article 45a, and a description of how the transition plan of the undertaking described in Article 44a is addressing and reducing the undertaking's exposure to climate change risks;
Amendment 522 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point a
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point a
(a) a description of the system of governance, including a description of the role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies with regard to sustainability risks in line with Article 41;
Amendment 527 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point c – point iii
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point c – point iii
(iii) for insurance and reinsurance undertakings relevant for the financial stability of the financial systems in the Union, information on risk sensitivity, including in relation to sustainability risks;
Amendment 530 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point c – point vi a (new)
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point c – point vi a (new)
(vi a) climate and other sustainability targets and transition plan targets of the undertaking, including absolute carbon emission reduction targets for its underwriting and investment portfolios, submitted in accordance with Articles 44(2a) (new) and 44a (new), and the progress made towards implementing them;
Amendment 534 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point c – point vi b (new)
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point c – point vi b (new)
(vi b) how the undertaking's business model and strategy take account of sustainability risks faced by the undertaking.
Amendment 537 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 26 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point c a (new)
Article 51 – paragraph 1b – point c a (new)
(c a) where the undertaking conducts a climate change scenario analysis, a description of the results of the latest climate change scenario analysis as described in Article 45a, and a description of how the transition plan of the undertaking described in Article 44a (new) is addressing and reducing the undertaking's exposure to climate change risks.
Amendment 544 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
2. Member States may extend the obligation laid down in paragraph 1 to captive insurance undertakings and, captive reinsurance undertakings and low risk profile undertakings.
Amendment 546 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 27
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 51a – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 51a – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States may extend the scope of the audit requirement to other elements of the solvency and financial condition report.
Amendment 547 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 28 – point c a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 28 – point c a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 52 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 52 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph is added: ‘3a. EIOPA shall monitor the appropriateness and soundness of the criteria for identifying low-risk profile undertakings and groups and assess the effects of applying those criteria, at least with respect to the objectives of policyholders’ protection, financial stability and level playing field. EIOPA shall submit a report on its findings to the Commission by [OP please insert date = three years after entry into application].’;
Amendment 552 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 36
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 36
Amendment 559 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 36 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 36 a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 77 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 77 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Cost-of-Capital rate referred to in paragraph 5 shall be assumed to be equal to 6%.
Amendment 564 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 37
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 37
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 77a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 77a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, second subparagraph, any parameters determining the speed of the convergence of the forward rates towards the ultimate forward rate of the extrapolation may be chosen such that on [OP please insert date = application date] the risk-free interest rate term structure is sufficiently similar to the risk-free interest rate term structure on that date determined in line with the rules for the extrapolation applicable on [OP please insert date = one day before date of application]. Those parameters of the extrapolation shall be decreased linearly at the beginning of each calendar year, during a transitional period. The final parameters of the extrapolation shall be applied as of 1 January 2032The extrapolated risk-free rate shall be determined as follows: rFSP+h = FSP+h√((1+rFSP)FSP * exp(h*fh)) - 1 Where: fh = ln(1+UFR) + [(LLFR - ln(1+UFR)] * ((1-exp(-a*h)/(a*h)) (a) UFR is the Ultimate Forward Rate (b) a is the convergence speed parameter (c) LLFR is the Last Liquid Forward Rate (d) FSP is the First Smoothing Point. The convergence speed parameter a shall be set at 10%.
Amendment 572 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 37 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 37 a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 77b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 77b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(37a) in subparagraph 1 of Article 77b(1) point (a) is replaced by the following: ‘the insurance or reinsurance undertaking has assigned a portfolio of assets, consisting of bonds and other assets with similar cash-flow characteristics, and excluding any assets in fossil fuel companies, activities, reserves and fossil fuel power plants, to cover the best estimate of the portfolio of insurance or reinsurance obligations and maintains that assignment over the lifetime of the obligations, except for the purpose of maintaining the replication of expected cash flows between assets and liabilities where the cash flows have materially changed; (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02009L0138-’ Or. en 20210630Directive)
Amendment 584 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 77d – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 77d – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. The amount of the volatility adjustment to risk-free interest rates for a currecny shall be calculated as follows: 𝑉𝐴𝑐𝑢 = 85% ∙ 𝐶𝑆𝑆𝑅𝐶𝑈 ∙ 𝑰𝑳𝑹𝒄𝒖 ∙ ∙ 𝑅𝐶𝑆𝐶𝑈 Where: cu (a) VA is the volatility adjustment for a cu currency cu; cu (b) CSSR is the credit spread sensitivity cu ratio of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking for the currency cu; cu (c) RCS is the risk-corrected spread for cu the currency cu; (d) IL𝑅𝑐𝑢 is the illiquidity ratio of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking for the currency cu; IL𝑅𝑐𝑢 shall measure the degree of illiquidity of the liabilities in a currency.
Amendment 591 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 38 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 77d – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 77d – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
4. For the euro, the volatility adjustment shall be increased by a macro volatility adjustment. The macro volatility adjustment shall be calculated as follows: 𝑉𝐴∙𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜, 𝜔𝑐𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑜 = 85% ∙ 𝐶𝑆𝑆𝑅𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜 ∙ 𝑰𝑳𝑹𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐 ∙ 𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝑅𝐶𝑆𝑐𝑜 ― 1.3 ∙ 𝑅𝐶𝑆𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜;0) Where: (a) VAEuro,macro is the macro volatility adjustment for a country co; (b) CSSREuro is the credit spread sensitivity ratio of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking for the euro; (c) RCSco is the risk-corrected spread for the country co; (d) RCSEuro is the risk-corrected spread for the euro; (e) wco is the country adjustment factor for country co; (f) ILREuro is the illiquidity ratio of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking for the euro; ILREuro is calculated for the euro in accordance with paragraph 3.
Amendment 600 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 39 a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 78 – point 3 a (new)
Article 78 – point 3 a (new)
Amendment 617 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 43 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 43 a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 101 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 101 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 622 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 43 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 43 b (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 105 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 105 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
(43b) in paragraph 5 of Article 105 the following subparagraph is added: ‘Equity and spread risk sub-modules referred to in points (a) and (d) of subparagraph 2 shall consider climate- related financial risks associated with fossil fuel sector exposures.’
Amendment 638 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 46 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 46 – point a
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 111 – paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
Article 111 – paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
(ma) the method and parameters to be used when assessing the capital requirement for climate-related financial risk in the case of exposures to fossil fuel assets referred to in Articles 101(4) and 105(5).
Amendment 660 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 – point - a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 – point - a (new)
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 132 – paragraphs 2 a (new) and 2 b (new)
Article 132 – paragraphs 2 a (new) and 2 b (new)
(-a) the following paragraphs are inserted: ‘2a. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall take into account the potential long-term impact of their investment strategy and decisions on sustainability factors. Where relevant, that strategy and those decisions shall reflect the sustainability preferences of its customers taken into account in the produce approval process as referred to in Article 4 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2358. 2b. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall have and shall publicly disclose a written policy in relation to their approach to stewardship including a summary of how the undertaking has taken steps to achieve the goals of the policy in the preceding year. The stewardship policy must be subject to prior approval by the administrative, management or supervisory body and shall be reviewed at least annually. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall integrate their transition plan within their investment strategy and decisions.’
Amendment 661 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 – point b
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 132 – paragraph 5
Article 132 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that insurance and reinsurance undertakings take account of possible macroeconomic and financial markets’ developments, including developments related to climate change and pandemics, and, at the request of the supervisory authority, macroprudential concerns when they decide on their investment strategy.
Amendment 664 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 – point b
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 132 – paragraph 6
Article 132 – paragraph 6
6. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall assess the extent to which their investment strategy may affect macroeconomic and financial markets’ developments, including developments related to climate change, and have the potential to turn into sources of systemic risk, and incorporate such considerations. Undertakings should also consider the cumulative impact of their own investment strategy and those of other undertakings. These assessments and considerations should be incorporated as part of their investment decisions of the undertaking.
Amendment 777 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 89 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 89 – point c
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 301a – paragraph 5
Article 301a – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 17, 29, 31, 35, 35b, 37, 44, 44a, 50, 56, 75, 86, 92, 97, 99, 109a, 111, 114, 127, 130, 135, 143, 172, 210, 211, 216, 217, 227, 234, 241, 244, 245, 247, 248, 256, 256b, 258, 260 or 308b shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of three months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and to the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by three months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.;
Amendment 785 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 91
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 91
Directive 2009/138/EU
Article 304a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 304a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. EIOPA, after consulting the ESRB, shall assess, on the basis of available data and the findings of the Platform on Sustainable Finance referred to in Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council* and the EBA in the context of its work under the mandate set out in Article 501c, point (c), of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 whether a dedicated prudential treatment of exposures related to assets or activliabilities associated substantially with environmental or social objectives would be justified. In particular, EIOPA shall assess the potential effects of a dedicated prudential treatment of exposures related to assets and activliabilities which are associated substantially with environmental and/or social objectives or which are associated substantially with harm to such objectives on the protection of policy holders and financial stability in the Union.
Amendment 787 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 91
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 91
Directive 2009/138/EC
Paragraph 304a – paragraph 1 – subparagraphs 2 a (new) and 2 b (new)
Paragraph 304a – paragraph 1 – subparagraphs 2 a (new) and 2 b (new)
EIOPA shall review existing evidence and update the report every two years. EIOPA should also assess the impact that the proposed changes to the prudential framework would have on: (a) the underwriting and investment activities of undertaking that may affect the macroeconomic and financial markets' developments (in particular climate change) and have the potential to turn into sources of systemic risk; (b) advancing the objective to achieve climate neutrality in the EU by 2050 at the latest, as set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 ("European Climate Law"). By 31 December 2023, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council specifying how it will take into account EIOPA's report and findings. The Commission's report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal.
Amendment 788 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 91
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 91
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 304a – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 304a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. By 28 June 2023, EIOPA, after consultation with stakeholders, shall publish guidelines for supervisory authorities on how insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall integrate sustainability risks and adverse impacts on sustainability factors into their risk management systems in accordance with Article 44, including in relation to the types of sustainability risks and sustainability factors that shall be considered by insurance and reinsurance undertakings and processes for identifying and managing adverse impacts on sustainability factors.
Amendment 791 #
2021/0295(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 91
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 91
Directive 2009/138/EC
Article 304a – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 304a – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. EIOPA shall evaluate whether and to what extent insurance and reinsurance undertakings assess their material exposure to risks related to biodiversity loss as part of the assessment referred to in Article 45(1). EIOPA shall subsequently assess which actions could be taken in order to ensure that insurance and reinsurance undertakings do so, where necessary, taking into account existing measurement tools. EIOPA shall submit a report on its findings to the Commission by [one year after the entry into force of this amending Directive].
Amendment 15 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Renewable energy plays a fundamental role in delivering the European Green Deal and for achieving climate neutrality by 2050, given that the energy sector contributes over 75% of total greenhouse gas emissions in the Union. By reducing those greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy also contributes to tackling environmental-related challenges such as biodiversity loss. The low operating costs of renewable energy and the reduced exposure to price shocks compared to fossil fuels gives renewable energy a key role in tackling energy poverty.
Amendment 36 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Buildings have a large untapped potential to contribute effectively to the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the Union, while simultaneously contributing towards the elimination of energy poverty. The decarbonisation of heating and cooling in this sector through an increased share in production and use of renewable energy will be needed to meet the ambition set in the Climate Target Plan to achieve the Union objective of climate neutrality. However, progress on the use of renewables for heating and cooling has been stagnant in the last decade, largely relying on increased use of biomass. Without the establishment of targets to increase the production and use of renewable energy in buildings, there will be no ability to track progress and identify bottlenecks in the uptake of renewables. Furthermore, the creation of targets will provide a long-term signal to investors, including for the period immediately after 2030. This will complement obligations related to energy efficiency and the energy performance of buildings. Therefore, indicative targets for the use of renewable energy in buildings should be set to guide and incentivise Member States’ efforts to exploit the potential of using and producing renewable energy in buildings, encourage the development of and integration of technologies which produce renewable energy while providing certainty for investors and local level engagement.
Amendment 142 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15 a
Article 15 a
2. Member States shall introduce measures in their building regulations and codes and, where applicable, in their support schemes, to increase the share of electricity and heating and cooling from renewable sources in the building stock, including national measures relating to substantial increases in renewables self- consumption, renewable energy communities and local energy storage, in combination with energy efficiency improvements relating to cogeneration and passive, nearly zero-energy and zero- energy buildings. Member states shall take steps to ensure that this increased share of electricity, heating and cooling from renewable sources is distributed across publicly-owned housing stock and rental accommodation.
Amendment 144 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 15 a– point 4
Article 15 a– point 4
4. In order to achieve the indicative share of renewable energy set out in paragraph 1, Member States shall promote the use of renewable heating and cooling systems and equipment. To that end, Member States shall use all appropriate measures, tools and incentives, including, among others, energy labels developed under Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 , energy performance certificates pursuant to Directive 2010/31/EU, or other appropriate certificates or standards developed at national or Union level, and shall ensure the provision of adequate information and advice on renewable, highly energy efficient alternatives as well as on financial instruments and incentives available to promote an increased replacement rate of old heating systems and an increased switch to solutions based on renewable energy. Member States shall provide targeted additional support measures and information for those at risk of energy poverty to enable their participation in the energy transition.; __________________ 26 Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2017 setting a framework for energy labelling and repealing Directive 2010/30/EU (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 1).
Amendment 173 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 23 – paragraph 1 a
Article 23 – paragraph 1 a
1a. Member States shall carry out an assessment of their potential of energy from renewable sources and of the use of waste heat and cold in the heating and cooling sector including, where appropriate, an analysis of areas suitable for their deployment at low ecological risk and, of the potential for small-scale household projects and of the potential for projects directed at low-income households and persons at risk of energy poverty. The assessment shall set out milestones and measures to in increase renewables in heating and cooling and, where appropriate, the use of waste heat and cold through district heating and cooling with a view of establishing a long- term national strategy to decarbonise heating and cooling. The assessment shall be part of the integrated national energy and climate plans referred to in Articles 3 and 14 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, and shall accompany the comprehensive heating and cooling assessment required by Article 14(1) of Directive 2012/27/EU.;
Amendment 176 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point d
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 23 – paragraph 4 – point d
Article 23 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) capacity building for national and local authorities to plan and implement renewable projects and infrastructures, particularly projects that have the potential to tackle energy poverty and increase the participation of low-income households in the energy transition;
Amendment 182 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point d
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
When adopting and implementing those measures, Member States shall ensure their accessibility to all consumers, in particular those in low-income or vulnerable households, who would not otherwise possess sufficient up-front capital to benefitwith specific, targeted provisions, supports and programmes to make these measures accessible to those in low-income or vulnerable households, who would not otherwise benefit from such measures, due to a lack of sufficient up-front capital and to non-financial barriers.;
Amendment 76 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7 a) The shortcomings in the implementation of the European Emissions Trading System have been widely recognized, especially the enormous amounts of free allowances allocated in order to prevent carbon leakage. This has been proven to harm the purpose of reducing greenhouse emissions in the sectors where this has been more prominent, while simultaneously allowing for windfall profits to happen, which makes it a socially unfair system. Moreover, it is important to strengthen the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) in order to guarantee price stability and to increase the Linear Reduction Factor (LRF) to speed up the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Amendment 77 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 b (new)
Recital 7 b (new)
(7 b) Due to the shortcomings of the ETS,and overall the social tensions that come with carbon pricing mechanisms, it is important to provide a broader set of solutions in order to reduce greenhousegas emissions in a timely manner. This includes guaranteeing that funds are allocated to public investment to important sectors such as energy production and railways.
Amendment 78 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Those amendments have differing economic and social impacts on the different sectors of the economy, on the citizens, and the Member States. In particular, the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council31 shouldis intended to provide an additional economic incentive to invest into the reduction of fossil fuel consumption and thereby accelerate the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Combined with other measures, this shouldmay, in the medium to long term, reduce the costs for buildings and road transport, and provide new opportunities for job creation and investment. However, the relative inelasticity of the road transport and buildings market to higher carbon prices raises concerns that their inclusion in the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC may be limited in terms of greenhouse gas reductions, particularly among lower- income households. _________________ 31 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
Amendment 79 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Those amendments have differing economic and social impacts on the different sectors of the economy, on the citizens, and the Member States. In particular, the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council31 should provide an additional economic incentive to invest into the reduction of fossil fuel consumption and thereby accelerate the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Combined with other measures, this should,However, this inclusion will increase energy prices and will lead to a disproportional impact on the available income of households, especially low- income earners. To tackle this issue properly public investment and target policies are needed in the medium to long term, to both reduce the costs for buildings and road transport, and provide new opportunities for job creation and investment. _________________ 31 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
Amendment 85 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) However, resources are needed to finance those investments. In addition, before they have taken place, the cost supported by households and transport users for heating, cooling and cooking, as well as for road transport, is likely towill increase as fuel suppliers subject to the obligations under the emission trading for buildings and road transport pass on costs on carbon to the consumers.
Amendment 86 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The increase in the price for fossil fuels maywill disproportionally affect vulnerable households, vulnerable micro- enterprises and vulnerable transport users who spend a larger part of their incomes on energy and transport, who, in certain regions, do not have access to alternative, affordable mobility and transport solutions and who may lack the financial capacity to invest into the reduction of fossil fuel consumption. Varying income levels and costs of living across the EU mean that the impact of a union-wide carbon price on buildings and road transport will have widely varying impacts on households in different regions and Member States.
Amendment 104 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) This is even more relevant in view of the existing levels of energy poverty. Energy poverty is a situation in which households are unable to access essential energy services such as cooling, as temperatures rise, and heating. About 34 million Europeans reported an inability to keep their homes adequately warm in 2018, and 6.98.2% of the Union population have said that they cannot afford to heat their home sufficiently in a 201920 EU-wide survey 32a . Overall, the Energy Poverty Observatory estimates that more than 50 million households in the European Union experience energy poverty. Energy poverty is therefore a major challenge for the Union. While social tariffs or direct income support can provide immediate relief to households facing energy poverty, only targeted structural measures, in particular energy renovations, can provide lasting solutions. _________________ 32a Data from 201820. Eurostat, SILC [ilc_mdes01]).
Amendment 139 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Pending the impact of those investments on reducing costs and emissions, well targeted direct income support for the most vulnerable would help the just transition. Such support should be understood to be a temporcomplementary measure accompanying the decarbonisation of the housing and transport sectors. It wshould not be permanent as, however, be recognized that it does not address the root causes of energy and transport poverty. Such support should only concern direct impacts of the inclusion of building and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC, not electricity or heating costs related to the inclusion of power and heat production in the scope of that Directive. Eligibility for such direct income support should be limited in timemobility poverty.
Amendment 151 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Member States should submit their Plans together with the update of their integrated national energy and climate plans in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council35 . Member States should have the option to submit their Plans and, where relevant, the update of their integrated national energy and climate plans, ahead of the dates foreseen in Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, so that the Plans can be put into action as soon as possible. The Plans should include the measures to be financed, their estimated costs and the national contribution. They should also include key milestones and targets to assess the effective implementation of the measures. _________________ 35 Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 176 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) In order to ensure transparent rules for monitoring and evaluation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of setting the common indicators for reporting on the progress and for the purpose of monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the Plans. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. Specific efforts should be made to consult with groups and individuals most impacted by energy poverty. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Amendment 189 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
The general objective of the Fund is to contribute to thea socially fair transition towards climate neutrality by addressing the social impacts of that transition, including the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport into the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC, and to ensure the ability of vulnerable households to participate in and adapt to the transition at a similar pace as high income households are able to do without financial support. The specific objective of the Fund is to support vulnerable households, and vulnerable micro-enterprises and vulnerablewith low capacity to invest in, or limited access to, alternative heating, cooling and transport usersmodes, through temporary direct income support and through measurestargeted measures, including policy reforms, and investments intended to phase out fossil fuels, increase energy efficiency of buildings, decarbonisation of heating and cooling of buildings, including the integration of energy from renewable sources, and granting improved access to zero- and low-emission mobility and public transport.
Amendment 199 #
2021/0206(COD)
In line with these objectives, the investments and policy reforms contained in the Social Climate Fund should not provide any support which could prolong the use of fossil fuels.
Amendment 201 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘building renovation’ means all kinds of energy-related building renovation, including the insulation of the building envelope, that is to say walls, roof, floor, the replacement of windows, the replacement of heating, cooling and cooking appliances by appliances that do not require fossil fuels, and the installation of on-site production of energy from renewable sources;
Amendment 203 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘energy poverty’ means energy poverty as defined in point [(49)] of Article 2 of Directive (EU) [yyyy/nnn] of the of the European Parliamhouseholds’ lack of access to essential energy services and lack of affordability of those services that underpin a decent standard of the Council50 ; _________________ 50 [Directive (EU) [yyyy/nnn] of the of the European Parliament and of the Counliving and health, including adequate warmth and hot water, cooling, lighting, and energy to power appliances, in the relevant national contact, existing social (OJ C […], […], p. […]).] [Proposal for recast of Directive 2012/27/EU onpolicy and other relevant policies. Energy poverty can be caused by one or the combination of the following factors: low income, high energy expenditures and poor energy efficiency] of homes;
Amendment 205 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘energy poverty’ means energy poverty as defined in point [(49)] of Article 2 of Directive (EU) [yyyy/nnn] of the of the European Parliament and of the Council50 ; _________________ 50 [Directive (EU) [yyyy/nnn] of the of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ C […], […], p. […]).] [Proposal for recast of Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency]a household's lack of access to essential and affordable energy services that underpin a decent standard of living and health, including adequate warmth, cooling, lighting and energy to power appliances, in the relevant national context, existing social policy and other relevant policies;
Amendment 207 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2 a) ‘mobility poverty’ means households that have a high share of mobility expenditure to disposable income or a limited availability of affordable public or alternative modes of transport required to meet essential socio-economic needs in a given context, with a particular focus on households in rural, insular, mountainous, remote and less accessible areas or less developed regions or territories, including less developed (peri- )urban areas, and can be caused by one or a combination of the following factors: low income, high fuel expenditures and/or high costs of public transport, lack of availability of adequate, affordable public or alternative modes of transport and their accessibility and location, travelled distances, transport practices and the poor performance of vehicles.
Amendment 232 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall submit to the Commission a Social Climate Plan (‘the Plan’) together with the update to the integrated national energy and climate plan referred to in Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 in accordance with the procedure and timeline laid down in that Article. Member States should have the option to submit their Plans and, where relevant, the update of their integrated national energy and climate plans, ahead of the dates foreseen in Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, so that the Plans can be put into action as soon as possible. The Plan shall contain a coherent set of measures and investments to address the impact of carbon pricing on vulnerable households, vulnerable micro-enterprises and vulnerable transport users in order to ensure affordable heating, cooling and mobility while accompanying andempowering local communities to take ownership in accelerating necessary measures to meet the climate targets of the Union.
Amendment 247 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The Plan shall include national, regional and local projects to:
Amendment 249 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) finance measures and investments to increase energy efficiency of buildings, to implement energy efficiency improvement measures, to carry out building renovation, and to decarbonise heating and cooling of buildings, including the integration of energy production from renewable energy sources, particularly by tenants, cooperatives and renewable energy communities;
Amendment 252 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) finance measures and investments to increase the uptake of zero- and low- , accessibility, affordability and infrastructure development of zero-emission mobility and public transport.
Amendment 254 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) national policy reforms addressing non-monetary barriers to improvements in transport and buildings efficiency and renewable energy use to facilitate and to accelerate the socially fair decarbonisation of transport and buildings.
Amendment 257 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a (new)
Amendment 258 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point -a (new)
(-a) detailed quantitative information on energy and mobility poverty: the number of vulnerable households and vulnerable micro-enterprises, identified at the start of the Plan, on the basis of the definitions in Article 2;
Amendment 259 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point -a a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point -a a (new)
(-a a) national targets and objectives to reduce the number of vulnerable households and vulnerable micro- enterprises, over the duration of the Plan, including through measures and investments that are financed by other sources of funding beyond the Fund’s financial envelope;
Amendment 260 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point -a b (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point -a b (new)
Amendment 262 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) concrete measures and investments, including policy reforms, in accordance with Article 3 to reduceaddress the effects referred to in point (c) of this paragraph together with an explanation of how they would contribute effectively to the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 1 within the overall setting of a Member State’s relevant policies; and to point -a and -aa of paragraph 1 of this Article;
Amendment 267 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) concrete accompanying measures , including policy reforms, needed to accomplish the measures and investments of the Plan and reduce the effects referred to in point (c) as well as information on existing or planned financing of measures and investments from other Union, international, public or private sources;
Amendment 284 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) an explanation of how the Plan promotes high quality employment and decent working conditions, does not finance projects linked to fossil fuels, and ensures that no investment or measure, included in the Plan does significant harm to environmental objectives within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852; the Commission shall provide technical guidance to the Member States targeted to the scope of the Fund to that effect; no explanation is required for the measures referred to in Article 3(2);
Amendment 286 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(h a) the measures to be taken to prevent bureaucratic burden on household beneficiaries receiving support from the Fund;
Amendment 296 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
Amendment 304 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) reductions in the number of vulnerable households, especiallywith the aim to eradicate within the current decade households in energy and mobility poverty, and of vulnerable micro-enterprises and of vulnerable transport users, including in rural and remote areas.;
Amendment 310 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
(e b) creation of sustainable quality jobs.
Amendment 317 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 324 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may include the costs of measures providing temporary direct income support to vulnerable households and vulnerable households that are transport users to absorb the increase in road transport and heating fuel prices. Such support shall decrease over time with the completion of long-term solutions, such as deep building renovations, and be limited to the direct impact of the emission trading forhigh energy prices in the buildings and road transport sectors. Eligibility for such direct income support shall cease within the time limits identified under Article 4(1) point (d).
Amendment 330 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) support building renovations, especially for those occupying worst- performing buildings, including in the form of specific support for the renovation of social housing and financial support or fiscal incentives such as deductibility of renovation costs from the rent, independently of the ownership of the buildings concerned, provided that acap- on-rent regulation is implemented;
Amendment 332 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) contribute to the decarbonisation, including the electrification, of heating and cooling of, and cooking in, buildings and the integration of energy from renewable sources that contribute to the achievements of energy savings, including support for energy poor and vulnerable households to generate their own on-site renewable energy and to participate in renewable energy cooperatives and energy community projects;
Amendment 333 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) contribute to the decarbonisation, including the electrification, of heating and cooling of, and cooking in, buildings and the integration of energy from renewable sources that contribute to the achievements of energy savings, such as vouchers, subsidies or zero- and low-interest loans to invest in products and services to increase the energy performance of buildings or to integrate renewable energy sources in buildings;
Amendment 335 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) provide targeted, accessible and affordable information, education, awareness and advice on cost-effective measures and investments and available support for building renovations and energy efficiency, including through energy audits of buildings and one-stop- shops;
Amendment 337 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) support public and private entities in developing and providing affordable energy efficiency renovation solutions, prioritizing sufficient performance of the envelope and appropriate funding instruments in line with the social goals of the Fund; including support for the creation and/or management of one-stop- shops or similar bodies, to become dedicated contact points for information and support, specific to regional renovation needs, such as multi-unit buildings, rural homes and social housing;
Amendment 340 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) provide access to zero- and low- emission vehicles and bikes, including financial support or fiscal incentives for their purchase as well as for appropriate public and private infrastructure, including for recharging and refuelling, public transport and active modes of transport; for support concerning low-emission vehicles, a timetable for gradually reducing the support shall be provided;
Amendment 341 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) grant free access to public transport or adapted tariffs for access to public transport, as well as fostering sustainable mobility on demandincluding in rural, insular, mountainous, remote and less accessible areas or for less developed regions or territories, including less developed (peri- )urban areas, for example by incentivising the use of affordable and accessible public transport and shared mobility services;
Amendment 346 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(f a) create discretionary or reserve funds that can be used in the event of rapid increases in energy prices to provide emergency short-term support to energy poor, vulnerable and low-income households, on top of those supports originally provided for in Member States' Social Climate Plans, to shield these households from the impact of these price increases while longer-term amendments to the Social Climate Plans of the Member States concerned are implemented in accordance with Article 17 of this Regulation;
Amendment 390 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Each Member State may submit a request up to its maximum financial allocation to implement its Plan. When providing the technical support and exchange of good practices referred to in Article 4 (3) of this Regulation, the Commission will support Member States to make full use of this maximum financial allocation, according to specific circumstances and the energy poverty challenges faced by each Member State.
Amendment 411 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new)
(ii a) whether the Plan complies with the conditionalities and exclusions set out in article 5 paragraph 4 and 5 of this Regulation, including the exclusion of fossil fuel investments;
Amendment 414 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii a (new)
Amendment 419 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i
(i) whether the Plan is expected to have a lasting impact on the challenges addressed by that Plan, including on the achievement of the EU's 2030 climate and energy targets, and in particular on vulnerable households, vulnerable micro- enterprises and vulnerable transport users, especially households in energy poverty, in the Member State concerned;
Amendment 423 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
(ii) whether the arrangements proposed by the Member State concerned are expected to ensure the effective monitoring and implementation of the Plan, including the involvement of all relevant stakeholders, envisaged timetable, milestones and targets, and the related indicators;
Amendment 425 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iii a) where a Member State does not avail of the maximum financial allocation available in accordance with Article 13 of this Regulation, whether the measures contained in that Member State's Social Climate Plan are adequate to meet the energy poverty challenges facing energy poor, vulnerable and low-income houses in that Member State, also taking into account the impact of other programmes in that Member State not encompassed by this Regulation.
Amendment 427 #
2021/0206(COD)
(iii a) whether the measures and investments included in the plan deliver adequately on the potential synergies between climate,environment and social targets to meet the EU's 2030 targets and commitments to achieve the sustainable development goals.
Amendment 432 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission gives a negative assessment to a Plan, the decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall include the reasons for that negative assessment. The Member State concerned shall resubmit the Plan, after taking into account the assessment of the Commission. Following a resubmission of a Plan by a Member State, the Commission shall decide on the re-submitted Plan, by means of an implementing act, within three months from the date of resubmission.
Amendment 433 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission gives a negative assessment to a Plan, the decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall include the reasons for that negative assessment. The Member State concerned shall resubmit the Plan, after taking into account the assessment of the Commission and making public the changes made to the Plan.
Amendment 435 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission gives a positive assessment to the amended Plan, it shall in accordance with Article 16(1) adopt, within three months of the official submission of the amended Plan by the Member State, a publicly available decision setting out the reasons for its positive assessment, by means of an implementing act.
Amendment 447 #
2021/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. When making any decision related to the suspension of payments, reduction in the amount or de-commitment of the amount of the financial allocation to a Member State, the Commission will examine the impact of such actions on those living in energy poverty in that Member State and take steps to prevent any potential negative impacts identified.
Amendment 35 #
2021/0200(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The European Green Deal31 combines a comprehensive set of mutually reinforcing measures and initiatives aimed at achieving climate neutrality in the Union by 2050, and sets out a new growth strategy that aims to transform the Union into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, where economic growthimprovement in people’s wellbeing is decoupled from resource use. It also aims to protect, conserve and enhance the Union's natural capital, and protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. At the same time, this transition affects women and men differently and has a particular impact on some disadvantaged groups, such as older people, persons with disabilities, persons at risk of energy poverty and persons with a minority racial or ethnic background. It must therefore be ensured that the transition is just and inclusive, leaving no one behind. __________________ 31 Commission Communication - The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final of 11 December 2019.
Amendment 43 #
2021/0200(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) While emissions trading will also apply to greenhouse gas emissions from road and maritime transport as well as buildings, the scope of Regulation (EU) 2018/842 will be maintained. Emissions trading should not become a substitute for robust national emission reduction measures, as it is insufficient to address non-market barriers to deploying clean energy solutions at scale, and insufficient to mitigate the negative impacts of carbon pricing on vulnerable groups and those facing energy poverty. Regulation (EU) 2018/842 will therefore continue applying to the greenhouse gas emissions from domestic navigation, but not to those from international navigation. Greenhouse gas emissions of a Member State within the scope of Regulation (EU) 2018/842 to be taken into account for compliance checks will continue to be determined upon completion of inventory reviews in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and the Council34 . __________________ 34 Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 107 #
2021/0200(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(1d) Member States shall use revenues generated by transfers of annual emission allocations pursuant to Article 5, paragraphs 4 and 5 of Directive (EU) 2018/842 to tackle climate change in the Union or in third countries, and/ or to alleviate energy poverty in a manner that enables lower-income households, women, older persons, persons with a disability and persons of a minority background to fully participate in the energy transition. Member States shall inform the Commission and national parliaments of any actions taken pursuant to this paragraph.
Amendment 125 #
2021/0200(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 1a Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 is amended as follows: In Article 14, the following paragraph 5a is inserted: “As foreseen in Article 14, paragraph 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, each Member State shall, when updating its integrated national energy and climate plan at the intervals set out in Article 14, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the same regulation, modify its national objective, target or contribution to the quantified Union objectives. When performing this update, each Member State should align its integrated national energy and climate plan with the 2030 emission limit set for that Member State in column 2 of Annex I to this Regulation. Each Member State shall update their long-term strategies, submitted in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, to make these long-term strategies consistent with the Union’s climate neutrality objective as set out in Article 2, paragraph 1 of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119. Member States should prepare and submit these updates to the Commission by 31 December 2022, in order to ensure that the updates to the integrated national energy and climate plans detailed in paragraph 1 of this article can be consistent with the updated long-term strategies, in accordance with Article15, paragraph 6 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999.”
Amendment 92 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
Recital 44
(44) Credit offers or credit sales that have not been solicited by the consumers may in some cases be associated with practices that are harmful to the consumer. In this regard, Member States shall prohibit (i) unsolicited sales of credit, including non- requested pre-approved credit cards sent to the consumers, or the unilateral increase of a consumers’ overdraft or credit card limit, should be prohibitedand (ii) unsolicited credit offers, including visits by the creditor or credit intermediary to the consumer’s place of residence or place of employment, on the occasion of which a credit offer is made to the consumer, without the prior express consent of the consumer; and the creditor or credit intermediary sending to a consumer, by any means of communication, a credit offer, a credit contract, or a payment instrument, without the prior request or express consent of the consumer or a pre-existing legal or contractual obligation.
Amendment 100 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 46
Recital 46
(46) It is essential that the consumer’s ability and propensity to repay the credit is assessed and verified before a credit agreement or an agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services is concluded. That assessment of creditworthiness should be done in the interest of the consumer, to prevent irresponsible lending practices and over- indebtedness, and should take into consideration all necessary and relevant factors that could influence a consumer’s ability to repay the credit as well as a consumer’s ability to afford the credit. Member States should be able to issue additional guidance on additional criteria and methods to assess a consumer’s creditworthiness, for example by setting limits on loan-to-value or loan- to-income ratios.
Amendment 101 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) The assessment of creditworthiness should be based on information on the financial and economic situation, including income and expenses, of the consumer. The European Banking Authority Guidelines on loan origination and monitoring (EBA/GL/2020/06) provide guidelines on what categories of data may be used for the processing of personal data for creditworthiness purposes, which include evidence of income or other sources of repayment, information on financial assets and liabilities, or information on other financial commitments. Personal data, such as personal data found on social media platforms or health data, including cancer data, should not be used when conducting a creditworthiness assessment. Consumers should provide information about their financial and economic situation in order to facilitate the creditworthiness assessment. In principle, cCredit should only made available to the consumer where the result of the creditworthiness assessment indicates that the obligations resulting from the credit agreement or the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services are likely to be met in the manner required under that agreement. However, should such assessment be negative, the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services can exceptionally make credit available in specific and justified circumstances such as when they have a long-standing relationship with the consumer, or in case of loans to fund exceptional healthcare expenses, students loans or loans for consumers with disabilities. In such case, when deciding on whether or not to make the credit available to the consumer, the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services should take into account the amount and the purpose of the credit, and the likelihood that the obligations resulting from the agreement will be met.
Amendment 108 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 47 a (new)
Recital 47 a (new)
(47a) Member States shall ensure that the creditworthiness assessment and corresponding re-payment plans are tailored to the borrower’s specific profile and repayment capacity, including in the case of the most vulnerable consumers. In particular, where a creditor or a provider of crowdfunding credit services fulfils a social purpose as required by national law, the specificities of the loan such as its nature, maturity and interest rate, as well as the re-payment plan should fit the borrower’s specific profile. Creditors should be held liable and be subject to appropriate penalties in case of a breach of the requirements surrounding the creditworthiness assessment. Consumers should have access to proportionate and effective remedies including compensation for damage suffered by the consumer. Those remedies should be without prejudice to the application of other remedies available to consumers under Union or national law.
Amendment 173 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 (new)
Advertising of credit agreements shall not be personalised. Only standardised offers may be advertised, without using any data relating to a user to tailor it to a specific time, circumstance or situation.
Amendment 187 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) In case of a consumer credit with a promotional zero percent interest rate for the first 30 days of the loan duration, any penalty charges due during that period if payments are not made on time and any changes to the interest rate after the 30- day promotional period ends;
Amendment 188 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) a prominent, clearly visible warning to make consumers aware that borrowing costs money, using the words “warning: borrowing money costs money”. Powers are delegated to the European Commission to adopt and, where necessary, amend regulatory technical standards to stipulate the exact wording, presentation and format of the warning under Article 8 (fa). Those regulatory technical standards shall be adopted in accordance with Articles 10to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010. The European Banking Authority (EBA) shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to stipulate the exact wording, presentation and format of the warning under Article 8 (fa) for submission to the Commission by XX. EBA shall review, and if necessary, develop further draft regulatory technical standards for submission to the Commission for the first time by XX and every two years thereafter.
Amendment 225 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7
Article 10 – paragraph 7
Amendment 240 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Amendment 248 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Amendment 253 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Amendment 256 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation from paragraph 1 Member States may allow creditors or providers of crowdfunding credit services to require the consumer to hold a relevant insurance policy related to the credit agreement or crowdfunding credit services, taking into account proportionality considerations. In such cases, Member States shall ensure that the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services is required to accept the insurance policy from a supplier different to his or her preferred supplier where such insurance policy has a level of guarantee equivalent to the one the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services has proposed, without modifying the condition of the credit offering to the consumer. In addition, creditors or providers of crowdfunding credit services should not be permitted to offer a relevant insurance policy related to the credit agreement of crowdfunding credit services before a 7-day cooling off period in order to ensure that the consumer is able to compare offers.
Amendment 259 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
4. Member States may shall prohibit the use of the terms ‘advice’ and ‘advisor’ or similar terms when the advisory services are being marketed and provided to consumers by creditors or, where applicable, credit intermediaries or providers of crowdfunding credit services. Where Member States do not prohibit the use of the terms ‘advice’ and ‘advisor’ or similar terms, they shall impose the following conditions on the use of the term ‘independent advice’ or ‘independent advisor’ by creditors, credit intermediaries or providers of crowdfunding credit services providing advisory services:(a) creditors and, where applicable, credit intermediaries or providers of crowdfunding credit services shall consider a sufficiently large number of credit agreements or crowdfunding credit services available on the market; (b) credit intermediaries shall not be remunerated for the advisory services by one or more creditors. Point (b) of the second subparagraph shall apply only where the number of creditors considered is less than a majority of the market. Member States may impose more stringent requirements for the provision of advisory services use of the terms ‘independent advice’ or ‘independent advisor’ by creditors and, where applicable, credit intermediaries or providers of crowdfunding credit services
Amendment 287 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall require that, before concluding a credit agreement, or an agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services, the creditor or, where applicable, the provider of crowdfunding credit services makes a thorough has made a positive assessment of the consumer’s creditworthiness. That assessment shall be done in the interest of the consumer, to prevent irresponsible lending practices and over-indebtedness, and shall take appropriate account of factors relevant to (i) verifying the prospect of the consumer to meet his or her obligations under the credit agreement or the agreement for the provision of crowdfunding credit services and(ii) the risk to the consumer of not being able to meet his/her obligations.
Amendment 290 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The creditor shall make reasonable allowances for committed and other non- discretionary expenditures such as the consumers’ actual obligations, including appropriate substantiation and consideration of the living expenses of the consumer and his/her household. The assessment shall ensure that the agreed credit does not put the consumer in financial difficulty and allows the consumer to maintain a minimum standard of living. The creditor shall make prudent allowances for potential negative scenarios in the future, including for example, a reduced income; or where applicable, an increase in the borrowing rate or negative change in the exchange rate, or deferred payments of principal or interest. Member States shall ensure that credit intermediaries accurately transmit to the creditor information obtained from the consumer so that the creditworthiness assessment can be carried out.
Amendment 293 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The assessment of creditworthiness referred to in Article 8 shall be carried out exclusively on the basis of relevant and accurate information on the consumer’s income and expenses and other financial and economic circumstances which is necessary and proportionate such as evidence of income or other sources of repayment, information on financial assets and liabilities, or information on other financial committhe following information: – Evidence of identification - – Evidence of residence - – Where applicable, information on the purpose of the loan – Where applicable, evidence of eligibility for the purposes of the loan – Evidence of employment, including the type, sector, status (e.g. full- time, part-time, contractor, self-employed) and duration – Evidence of income or other sources of repayment (including annual bonus, commission, overtime, where applicable) covering a reasonable period, including payslips, current bank account statements, and audited or professionally verified accounts (for self-employed persons) – Information on financial assets and liabilities, e.g. savings account statements and loan statements indicating outstanding loan balances – Information on other financial commitments, such as child maintenance, education fees and alimonies, if relevant – Information on household composition and dependants – Evidence of tax status – Where applicable, evidence of life insurance for the named borrowers – Where applicable, data from credit registers or credit information bureaux or other relevant databases, covering the information on financial liabilities and arrears in payment – Information on the collateral, if any – Evidence of ownership of the collateral – Evidence of the value of the collateral – Evidence of insurance of the collateral – Information on guarantees, other credit risk mitigating factors and guarantors, if any – Rental agreement or evidence of potential rental income for buy-to-let loans, if any – Permissions and cost estimates, if applicable, for real estate building and improvement loans – the household general budget data of the borrower The information taken into account shall be necessary, sufficient and proportionate to assess the re-payment capacity of the consumer, in line with the data minimisation principle of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR). In addition, the information taken into account shall be relevant, up-to-date, complete and accurate. Data other than the categories of data listed above, and in line with Article 9(1) of the GDPR, data on racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person's sex life or sexual orientation shall not be processed nor used to perform creditworthiness assessments. The information shall be obtained from relevant internal or external sources, including the consumer and, where necessary, but not exclusively, on the basis of a consultation of a database referred to in Article 19. subject to the consumer’s prior information by the creditor and consent in line with the GDPR, and the consumer’s payment account, subject to the consumer’s consent as defined in Directive (EU) 2015/2366 on payment services in the internal market (PSD 2). The information obtained cannot only be based on consumer declarations and should be accompanied by supporting evidence. Appropriate checks are required where necessary through reference to independently verifiable documentation.
Amendment 313 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 340 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point v a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point v a (new)
(va) w) the relevant contact details of debt-advisory services and a recommendation for the consumer to contact such services in case of re- payment difficulties.
Amendment 346 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Member States shall require that the creditor or the provider of crowdfunding credit services inform the consumer of any change in the borrowing rate, on paper or another durable medium chosen by the consumer at least seven days, before the change enters into force.
Amendment 347 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where a credit has been granted in the form of an overdraft facility, Member States shall require that the creditor, throughout the duration of the credit agreement, keeps the consumer regularly informed, i.e. at least once a month, by means of statements of account, on paper or on another durable medium, containing the following elements:
Amendment 350 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Where a credit has been granted in the form of an overdraft facility, Member States shall require that the creditor informs the consumer, on paper or another durable medium at least seven days before, of increases in the borrowing rate or in any charges payable, before the change in question enters into force.
Amendment 353 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
2. In the event of a significantn overrunning exceeding a period of one monthtwo weeks, Member States shall require that the creditor informs the consumer without delay, on paper or on another durable medium, of all of the following:
Amendment 356 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 25 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Any fees charged for overrunning shall not exceed 0.5% of the amount overrun by. Creditors should ensure that the consumer is informed of these fees in line with all relevant provisions of this Directive.
Amendment 376 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the creditor may exceptionally claim higher compensation if the creditor can prove that the loss suffered due to early repayment exceeds the amount determined in accordance with paragraph 2. However, this compensation should not exceed the amount of interest that the consumer would have paid during the period between the early repayment and the agreed date of termination of the credit agreement.
Amendment 377 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The annual percentage rate of charge must also take into account the costs and charges for any additional insurance or other financial products that are either sold with, recommended for sale with or proposed for sale with the credit product.
Amendment 382 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – title
Article 31 – title
Caps on interest rates, annual percentage rate of charge and the total cost of the credit to the consumer
Amendment 391 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 407 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) promoting the sale of goods or services, covered by a linked credit agreement
Amendment 410 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 32 – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 32 – paragraph 2 - subparagraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall prohibit remuneration policies contingent upon the interest rate or cost of the credit, or the type of credit product subscribed.
Amendment 414 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 32 – paragraph 4
Article 32 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that where creditors, credit intermediaries or providers of crowdfunding credit services provide advisory services the remuneration structure of the staff involved does not prejudice their ability to act in the consumer’s best interest and is not contingent on sales targets. In order to achieve that goal, Member States mayshall also ban commissions paid by the creditor to the credit intermediary.
Amendment 424 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall require creditors to have adequate policies and procedures so that they make efforts to exercise, where appropriate,exercise reasonable forbearance before enforcement proceedings are initiated. Such forbearance measures shall take into account, among other elements, the consumer’s circumstances and may consist in, among other possibilities:
Amendment 430 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 431 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 2
Article 35 – paragraph 2
Amendment 443 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 1
Article 36 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that debt advisory services are made available to consumers free of charge and independent.
Amendment 444 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 36 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 36 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall ensure that creditors systematically refer consumers experiencing or likely to experience financial difficulties, to the nearest debt- advice service available in their area. The European Commission should within two years of implementation of this Directive, produce a report providing an overview of the availability of debt-advice services across Member States, including their structure and financing models, and identify best practices for the further developments of such services.
Amendment 462 #
2021/0171(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 41 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 41 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Member States may apply national legislation to grant product intervention powers to national competent authorities to withdraw products with a high default rate.
Amendment 229 #
2021/0114(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the acquired undertaking or at least one of the merging undertakings is established in the Union and generates an aggregate turnover in the Union of at least EUR 5100 million; and
Amendment 235 #
2021/0114(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the undertakings concerned received from third countries an aggregate financial contribution in the three calendar years prior to notification of more than EUR 250 million.
Amendment 262 #
2021/0114(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 2
(2) For the purpose of Article 28, a notifiable foreign financial contribution in an EU public procurement procedure shall be deemed to arise where the estimated value of that public procurement is equal or greater than EUR 25100 million.
Amendment 9 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas of 2018,
Amendment 12 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative (2019/2803(RSP)),
Amendment 19 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture of 2009,
Amendment 28 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the European Pillar of Social Rights,
Amendment 29 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
Amendment 33 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 c (new)
Citation 5 c (new)
- having regard to its resolution on European protection of cross-border and seasonal workers in the context of the COVID-19 crisis adopted on 19 June,
Amendment 36 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 d (new)
Citation 5 d (new)
- having regard to the European Commission Guidelines on Seasonal workers issued on 16 July,
Amendment 39 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 e (new)
Citation 5 e (new)
- having regard to the Council conclusions on seasonal and mobile workers adopted on 12 October 2020,
Amendment 43 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the "European Environment – State and outlook 2020" report by the European Environment Agency,
Amendment 76 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to Council Directive of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (91/676/EEC) OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p.1,
Amendment 84 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 b (new)
Citation 11 b (new)
- having regard to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy,
Amendment 85 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 c (new)
Citation 11 c (new)
- having regard to Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration,
Amendment 107 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
Citation 21 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 4 April 2017 on women and their roles in rural areas,
Amendment 108 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 b (new)
Citation 21 b (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 16 January 2018 on Women, gender equality and climate justice,
Amendment 184 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas food should not be considered a commodity but a common good; whereas the Farm to Fork Strategy should be based on food as a human right and should recognise food sovereignty as a guiding principle;
Amendment 186 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas any policy on transforming our food chain must have farmers at its core, not only as affected stakeholders but as those best placed to drive this transformation;
Amendment 200 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Europe’s food system should deliver food and nutrition security in a way that contributes to social well- being and maintains and restores ecosystem health; whereas currently, the food system is the single largest driver of global deforestation and biodiversity loss in Europe as well as responsible for a range of adverse impacts on human and animal health and on the environment, and the climate and biodiversity; whereas the way in which we produce and consume food needs to transform radically and rapidly in order to ensure coherence with the SDGs, the Paris Agreement, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and EU policies, particularly in the areas of sustainability, the environment, climate, public health, animal welfare, working conditions, food and economic sustainability for farmers;
Amendment 248 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas working condition of a vast proportion of workers employed in the European agriculture sector are extremely challenging and precarious, characterised by poor wages, long working hours, a high proportion of undeclared work, an extremely high incidence of accidents and illness (according to Eurostat, agriculture is among the most dangerous occupations in Europe) and deplorable housing conditions with workers falling often prey to widespread exploitation, including gang master practices and other forms of modern slavery;
Amendment 266 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to human health, reducing and minimizing the use of antibiotics in animal husbandry will help slow down its emergence and spread, particularly in settings of intensive animal production, noting that in many countries much of the antibiotics used in animals are for growth promotion and prevention of disease, not to treat sick animals;
Amendment 282 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the European model of a multifunctional agricultural sector, driven by family farms, continues toan, if properly supported and valued, ensure quality food production, local supply chains, good agriculture practices, high environmental standards, high animal welfare standards, and vibrant rural areas throughout the EU; regrets however that this type of agriculture with its positive attributes is being neglected and marginalised by a policy of globalization of the food supply chain that is detrimental to rural areas at all levels, resulting in the undermining of all three pillars of true sustainable development, economic, social and environmental;
Amendment 341 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas in just over a decade several million farms have ceased to exist, representing over a third of all farms in Europe, and the vast majority of lost farms are small family businesses;
Amendment 346 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas this family farm model is under serious threat from the ever expanding factory style model of production;
Amendment 347 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the Farm to fork strategy should include in its remit a commitment to address the phenomenon of land concentration or “land grabbing”; recalls that land is an increasingly scarce resource, which is non-renewable, and is the basis of the human right to healthy and sufficient food, and of many ecosystem services vital to survival, and should therefore not be treated as an ordinary item of merchandise; notes that land is, threatened, on the one hand by the loss of agricultural land through soil sealing, urban development, tourism, infrastructure projects, and the spread of desertification caused by climate change, and, on the other hand, by the concentration of land in the hands of large-scale agricultural undertakings and investors from outside the farming sector; stresses that it is the responsibility of the authorities to control and limit the loss of agriculture land through such activities, small and medium-sized farms, direct ownership or properly regulated tenancy, and access to common land, are the best way of ensuring a responsible relationship with the land and sustainable land management, and of fostering identification and a sense of belonging; believes that such forms of tenure encourage people to remain in rural areas and enable them to work there, which has a positive impact on the socio-economic infrastructure of rural areas, food security, food sovereignty and the preservation of the rural way of life;
Amendment 362 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas food value chain actors have a large share of the responsibility for current unsustainable and unhealthy diets and must contribute to the transition to sustainable food systems and it is important that consumers are informed on the true cost of production and enabled to take responsibility for the consequences of their choice of food stuffs on the whole food system, from production to processing and distribution; whereas this requires a healthy and sound food environment which ensures that the healthy and sustainable choice is also the easy and affordable choice, and fosters and encourages consumption patterns that support human health while ensuring the sustainable use of natural and human resources and animal welfare, taking the employment conditions in the food chain into consideration;
Amendment 413 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the European food system has played a crucial role during the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrating its resilience with farmers, workers employed along the food value chain, processors and retailers working together under difficult conditions, and sanitary risks including lockdowns, to ensure that European consumers continue to have access to safe, affordable, and high quality products without impediment;
Amendment 414 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the European food system has played a crucial role during the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrating its resilience with farmers, processors and retailers working togetheragricultural labour workers, processing factory workers and retailers workers shouldering the burden under difficult conditions, including lockdowns, to ensure that European consumers continue to have access to safe, affordable, and high quality products without impediment;
Amendment 507 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the farm to fork strategy as an important step in ensuring a sustainable, fair and resilient food system, which is central to achieving the goals set out in the European Green Deal and in the SDGs; emphasises the inextricable links between healthy people, healthy societies and a healthy planet, which are all possible through cooperation with farmers to build a sustainable future; encourages the Commission to translate the strategy into concrete legislative and non-legislative action as soon as possible;
Amendment 509 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the farm to fork strategy as an important step in ensuring a sustainable, fair and resilient food system, which is central to achieving the goals set out in the European Green Deal, the European Pillar of Social Rights and in the SDGs; emphasises the inextricable links between healthy people, healthy societies and a healthy planet, as well as decent working conditions; encourages the Commission to translate the strategy into concrete legislative and non-legislative action as soon as possible;
Amendment 560 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the announcement of an impact-assesevidence-based proposal for a legislative framework for sustainable food systems; underlines that this proposal will be paramount in enabling policy integration and alignment at the EU-level to facilitate the transition to sustainable food systems; invites the Commission to use this proposal to set out a holistic common food policy aimed at reducing the environmental and climate footprint and negative public health impacts of the EU food system in order to make Europe the first climate- neutral continent by 2050, improving working and employment conditions across the food value chain and strengthening its environmental resilience to ensure medium and long term food security in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss, leading a global transition towards sustainability from farm to fork, based on the principle of a multifunctional agricultural sector while ensuring consistency between policies by taking into account the existing legislation in order to enable all actors in the European food system to develop long- term plans based on realistic and transparent objectives; underlines that maintaining and enhancing biodiversity is crucial for safeguarding EU and global food security, and that the coherence with the EU Biodiversity Strategy, including the contribution of Natura 2000 and Marine Protected Areas to support healthy food production, must be guaranteed; stresses the need for urgent and bold policy and legislative change in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence for the unsustainability of the current food system and the higher costs of a failure to act; suggests that the respective base lines and progress achieved in each Member State be taken into account, while promoting the exchange of know-how and best practices between Member States; stresses the need to include the entire food and beverage chains including primary producer, processing, marketing, distribution, hospitality and retail;
Amendment 586 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the announcement of an impact-assessed proposal for a legislative framework for sustainable food systems; invites the Commission to use this proposal to set out a holistic common food policy, centred around strong partnership with farmers, aimed at reducing the environmental and climate footprint of the EU food system in order to make Europe the first climate- neutral continent by 2050 and strengthen its resilience to ensure food security in the face of climate change and biodiversity loss, leading a global transition towards sustainability from farm to fork, based on the principle of a multifunctional agricultural sector while ensuring consistency between policies by taking into account the existing legislation in order to enable all actors in the European food system to develop long- term plans based on realistic and transparent objectives; suggests that the respective base lines and progress achieved in each Member State be taken into account, while promoting the exchange of know-how and best practices between Member States; stresses the need to include the entire food and beverage chains including processing, marketing, distribution and retail, as a way of ensuring that it is not only farmers who carry the burden for delivering this much needed transition;
Amendment 642 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that according to FAO agroecology is a key part of the global response to climate change and of the creation of sustainable food and agricultural systems; points out that the new legislative framework for sustainable food systems should be based on the principles and elements defined by FAO as agroecology in order to trigger an agroecological transition;
Amendment 685 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Subheading 2
Building the food chain that works for consumers, producers, food chain workers, climate and the environment
Amendment 734 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the decision to revise the directive on the sustainable use of pesticides and the reduction targets for pesticides, fertilisers, and antibiotics; emphasises the importance of pursuing these targets through holistic and circular approaches, such as agroecological practices; emphasises the need for more research and transfer of knowledge on agroecological practices and territorial markets for agroecological products in parallel with public policies supporting the agroecological transition; insists that each Member State should establish robust and time-bound quantitative reduction targets in their CAP Strategic Plans and other relevant policy instruments, accompanied by well- defined support measures ensuring accountability at all levels to help reach these targets; reiterates its call for the translation into legislation of the above targets and objectives and calls on the Commission to clarify how it will deal with individual Member States’ contributions to Union-wide targets and to clarify the baselines for these targets;
Amendment 763 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the decision to revise the directive on the sustainable use of pesticides and the reduction targets for pesticides, fertilisers, and antibiotics; emphasises the importance of pursuing these targets through holistic and circular approaches, such aswith assisting farmers with compliance at its centre, such as through training on agroecological practices; insists that each Member State should establish robust quantitative reduction targets, accompanied by well- defined support measures ensuring accountability at all levels to help reach these targets; reiterates its call for the translation into legislation of the above targets and objectives and calls on the Commission to clarify how it will deal with individual Member States’ contributions to Union- wide targets and to clarify the baselines for these targets;
Amendment 781 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises the need to place greater attention to the protection of workers’ health and safety in future EU legislative initiatives linked to the use of pesticides; reminds that pesticides can cause various health problems for workers exposed to them including skin irritations, allergies, poisoning, immune system disturbances, chromosomal damage, respiratory distress, male genital abnormalities, reproductive disorders and cancers; recalls the importance of ensuring all workers receive protective equipment as well as comprehensive information and training about the use and the associated dangers related to the use of pesticides; stresses the need to ensure that each agricultural worker is able to get official documentation reporting the type of pesticide used during their work activity; underlines that in order to achieve these targets it is crucial to further revise Directive2004/37/EC - carcinogens or mutagens at work- as well as the Plant Protection Product Regulation 1107/2009 and Directive 98/24/EC on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work
Amendment 831 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses the need to improve policy coordination between agricultural, pesticide-, biocide- and fertiliser-related legislation and, inter alia, water legislation in order to ensure the protection of our water resources from overexploitation and agricultural pollution; points out the need to promote adapted agricultural production such as low water requiring crops in areas affected by drought;
Amendment 945 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the importance of recognising the significant impact of agriculture and especially animal production on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and land use; stresses the need to enhance natural carbon sinks, where appropriate compensating land owners for maintenance, and reduce agricultural emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, in particular in the feed and livestock sectors; calls for regulatory measures and targets to ensure progressive reductions in all GHG emissions in these sectors;
Amendment 1004 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points ouRegrets that thate extensive and permanent grassland-based or organic animal husbandry is athat features as part of the European food system and a defining element of many traditional rural communities, and that it has multiple positive effects for the environment and mitigating against climate change, and contributes to a circular economy has not been adequately valued and supported; stresses that, in contrast, intensive livestock farming and crop monocultures causes major negative impacts on public health, animal welfare, biodiversity and the environment; emphasises that it is the globalization of our food supply chain that is driving this intensification, a policy that has delivered no benefits to the primary producer, but rather has locked them in as captive customers of financial institutions in a race to the bottom while consuming finite natural resources at an unsustainable rate that has undermined our food security; calls on the Commission to initiate a policy reorientation away from the obsession with competitiveness and endlessly increasing exports to one of true national and local food sovereignty that can guarantee food security into the future;
Amendment 1122 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Urges the Commission to greater involve young farmers in the development of new legislation, given that they will likely be the early adopters of new and greener farming methods;
Amendment 1149 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines the importance of seed security and diversity, notably of promoting EU-grown plant proteins to deliver locally sourced food and feed stuffs with high nutritional value while granting farmers access to quality seeds for plant varieties adapted to the pressures of climate change, including traditional and locally-adapted varieties, while ensuring access to innovative plant breeding in order to contribute to healthy seeds and protect pla; emphasises that new genomic techniques raise significant concerns as they are portrayed erroneously as a pathway to sustainable agriculture; underlines furthermore that crops obtained using new genomic techniques must continue to be regulated as GMOs, by maintaining a pre-market safety assessments against harmful pests and diseasesnd approval, traceability and labelling to allow for consumer choice; raises awareness of the potential negative effects of concentration and monopolisation in the seed sector; emphasises that the multiplication of new technologies makes it even more important to get risk assessment right: based on the most recent and relevant independent published science, produced and reviewed by scientists independent from industry, with EU risk assessment agencies being given the resources that they need to fulfil their mission in good conditions.
Amendment 1180 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the acknowledgment of the crucial role played by seed diversity in ensuring the sustainability and resilience of food production; expects a meaningful reform of the seeds marketing legal framework that would enable the wide range of crop diversity initiatives that exist in the EU as well as support the innovative emerging ones, and inter alia ensure that different types of diversity have facilitated access to the market; deplores the lack of a European policy on both animal and plant genetic resources, vital to ensure seed security; calls on the Commission to take initiatives to ensure that conventional breeding of plants and animals, including random processes, followed by further crossing and selection, is fully excluded from patentability; calls on the Commission to take initiatives to ensure that patents on biotechnological inventions which concern plants or animals are restricted to the specific technical processes;
Amendment 1212 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for CAP National Strategic Planon the European Commission to only approve CAP National Strategic Plans if they demonstrate their contribution to European Green Deal objectives given Member States respective baselines and that all CAP National Strategic Plans together meet the Union-wide targets; calls on Member States to ensure adequate financial support and incentives to promote new ecological ‘green’ business models for agriculture and artisanal food production,; stresses that both ERDF and EAFRD should be aligned to promote the goal of quality food production; notably through fostering short supply chains and quality food productionpremium brands;
Amendment 1246 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for CAP National Strategic Plans to ensure adequate financial support and incentives to promote new ecological ‘green’ business models for agriculture and artisanal food production, while ensuring farm incomes deliver a fair standard of living for our farming community, notably through fostering short supply chains and quality food production;
Amendment 1288 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the European food system delivers a sufficient and varied supply of safe, nutritious, affordable and sustainable food to people at all times and underlines that increasing the economic, environmental and social sustainability of food producers will ultimately increase their resilience; encourages the Commission to consider the food supply chain and its workers as a strategic asset for the safety and well-being of all Europeans; highlights however that the Covid-19 pandemic shed new light on the challenging working and living conditions of millions of farm workers in Europe; calls for the recognition of the importance of protecting workers’ individual and collective labour and social rights, thereby reinforcing the ‘social dimension’ of EU agriculture; calls on the Commission to strengthen measures focusing on the rights, working and employment conditions and social protection of farm labourers including migrants and other mobile workers, and to ensure coherence between policy areas on this issue;
Amendment 1319 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls that the social dimension must be fully integrated in all future initiatives of the farm to fork strategy along with the economic and environmental dimensions, to achieve a much-needed policy coherence for sustainable development; insists that improvement of working conditions, collective bargaining, social protection, investment in public services, inclusive governance and fair taxation should be included as sustainability criteria; this would contribute to making our production and consumption systems fairer and more sustainable in the long run and also contribute to the implementation of the UN Agenda 2030;
Amendment 1361 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expresses its deep concern about the emergence of zoonotic diseases that are transferred from animals to humans (anthropozoonoses), such as Q fever, avian influenza and the new strain of influenza A (H1N1), which is exacerbated by anthropogenic climate change, the destruction of biodiversity, environmental degradation and our current food production systems; draws attention to the fact that workers in the food chain are at risk of contracting Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) diseases; stresses the need to take appropriate measures to contain this serious occupational health hazard and minimise its potential impact on worker health; calls on the Commission and national regulatory agencies to recognise antimicrobial resistant pathogens as a work-related disease;
Amendment 1419 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for primary producers to be supported in making the transition to greater sustainability through the encouragement of cooperation and collective actions as well as through competition rules and the enhancement of; stresses that a more sustainable EU food system is a prerequisite for securing supply of safe and healthy food in the long term and that food security and food sustainability are not conflicting or competing objectives but rather interrelated and interdependent; points out the possibilities for enhanced cooperation within the common market organisations for agricultural, fishery and aquaculture products, and thus for farmers’ and fishers’e potential for the primary producer position in the supply chain to be strengthened in order to enable them to capture a fair share of the added value of sustainable production; highlights that food availability is generally not a major challenge in the EU while issues such as food waste, overconsumption and obesity, as well as the environmental footprint of European households’ food consumption are more significant challenges facing the EU food system today;
Amendment 1467 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 1502 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Amendment 1545 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the review of the EU promotion programme for agricultural and food products, including the EU school scheme, to align it fully with the European Green Deal and the Sustainable Development Goals, with a view to enhancing its contribution to sustainable production and consumption, notably by focusing on educational messages about the importance of healthy and sustainable nutrition and promoting greater consumption of fruit and vegetables with the aim of reducing obesity rates;
Amendment 1578 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Welcomes the commitment to strengthen the legislative framework on GIs; highlights that this should aim to introduce stricter environmental, animal welfare and social sustainability criteria of GIs; highlights that GIs are an important tool for rural development and for the protection of food agro- biodiversity;
Amendment 1627 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Emphasises the importance of advising and supporting women; through training and skills development, rural women can play a much greater role in the development of green food and agricultural value chains;
Amendment 1646 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for measures to reduce the burden that highly processed foods with high salt, sugar and fat content place on public health; regrets that the introduction of nutrient profiles is greatly delayed and stresses that a robust set of nutrient profiles must be developed to restrict or prohibit the use of false nutritional claims on foods high in fats, sugars and/or salt; calls for a mandatory EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition labelling system based on independent science; emphasises that any front-of- pack nutritional label should be developed based on robust, independent scientific evidence and be free from commercial interests; stresses furthermore that to facilitate comparison across products, any front-of-pack nutritional label should be based on uniform reference amounts such as per 100g/100ml;
Amendment 1675 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for measures to reduce the burden that highly processed foods with high salt, sugar and fat content place on public health; regrets that the introduction of nutrient profiles is greatly delayed and stresses that a robust set of nutrient profiles must be developed to restrict or prohibit the use of false nutritional claims on foods high in fats, sugars and/or salt, also noting the risk posed by less healthy 'dual quality' products; calls for a mandatory EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition labelling system based on independent science;
Amendment 1909 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the recognition in the strategy that Europeans’ diets are not in line with recommendations for healthy eating, and that a population-wide shift in consumption patterns is needed towards more healthy andfoods, in particular plant- based foods, and less red andhighly processed meat, sugars, salt, and fats, which will also benefit the environment; emphasises that EU-wide guidelines for sustainable and healthy diets would bring clarity to consumers on what constitutes a healthy and sustainable diet and inform Member States’ own efforts to integrate sustainability elements in national dietary advice; calls on the Commission to develop such guidelines and specific actions to effectively promote healthy plant-based diets;
Amendment 1933 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that the further development of plant protein production and alternative sources of protein in the EU, implemented in tandem with a move away from the continued intensification of livestock production with it recognised negative externalities, is a way of effectively addressing many of the environmental and climate challenges that EU agriculture is facing, as well as preventing deforestation in countries outside the EU;
Amendment 1938 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that the further development of plant protein production and alternative sources of protein in the EU is a way of effectively addressing many of the environmental and climate challenges that EU agriculture is facing,in the EU as well as preventing deforestation in countries outside the EU, as long as it is done without causing mass environmental damage to EU landscapes through land clearing for crops;
Amendment 1970 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls for a revision of public procurement legislation, including minimum mandatory criteria in schools and other public institutions to encourage organic and local food production and consumption to promote more healthy and sustainable diets by creating a food environment that enables consumers to make the healthy choice; further calls on the Commission to set mandatory targets for sustainable food procurement and to develop monitoring and reporting tools to collect data on these procurements;
Amendment 1996 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 2011 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Reiterates its call to take the measures required to achieve a Union food waste reduction target of 30 % by 2025 and 50 % by 2030 compared to the 2014 baseline; calls on the Commission to take action, notably through monitoring and measuring, to curb food waste occurring at the primary production level and the early stages of the supply chain, including unharvested food and food ploughed back into the field; calls for the identification of the trading practices and policy changes needed to prevent such food waste; stresses that CAP Strategic Plans should include Food Loss and Waste prevention actions at farm level, including support for the development of Short Food Supply Chains, which lower the risks of generating food waste; emphasises that waste of animal products incurs heavy burdens in both animal suffering and environmental damage and wasteful use of resources; underlines that binding targets are needed to achieve this;
Amendment 2095 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the importance EU funding for research and innovation as a key driverone of the necessary elements in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable, healthy and inclusive European food system while facilitating investments needed to encourage agro- ecological practices in both social and technological innovation, and the crucial role of farm advisory services in ensuring the transfer of knowledge to the farming community, drawing on the existing specialised training systems for farmers in Member States; recalls that innovation must involve small-scale primary producers on an equal level with researchers, respecting their acquired knowledge and know-how; warns against excessive reliance on technological innovations which do not address the root causes of problems nor the systemic environmental issues faced by the agricultural sector; reminds that many alternatives to excessive use of agricultural inputs such as chemical pesticides already exist and that it is essential to focus on better uptake by farmers; recalls that the precautionary principle underpins the EU Directive on GMO (Dir. 2001/18/EC) and that the 2018 ruling the Court of Justice of the EU strengthens the precautionary protection of human and environment;
Amendment 2125 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the importance EU funding for research and innovation, that will create tools which will be made available to farmers at reasonable prices, as a key driver in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable, healthy and inclusive European food system while facilitating investments needed to encourage agro- ecological practices in both social and technological innovation, and the crucial role of farm advisory services in ensuring the transfer of knowledge to the farming community, drawing on the existing specialised training systems for farmers in Member States;
Amendment 2144 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Considers the allocated budget to achieve the ambitions of the EU Green Deal and the Just transition mechanism to be insufficient to deal in a socially sustainable manner with the consequences of the expected transformation; calls for the Just transition mechanism to cover as well agricultural regions that may be adversely affected and underlines the need to ensure the proper involvement of social partners in the definition and implementation of future initiatives of the strategy;
Amendment 2170 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Considers that investment in innovation and research should not only contribute to a more sustainable but also a fairer food system, increasing the resources available to small-scale primary producers, as well as to public science and knowledge production while ending the corporate capture of certain EU research funds;
Amendment 2190 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls the global responsibility of European food systems and their key role in setting global standards for food safety, environmental protection and animal welfare; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that all food and feed products imported to the EU fully meet relevant EU regulations and standards and to provide development assistance to support primary producers from developing countries in meeting those standards; welcomes the Commission’s intention to take the environmental impacts of requested import tolerances into account; calls for all EU trade agreements to include enforceable clauses on commitment to the Paris Agreement, “non-regression” on environment and environmental democracy, and ‘do no harm’ principles, with a real enforcement mechanism accessible to civil society and citizens in the Trade and sustainable development chapter; recommends that agricultural and food imports, especially feed imports, having negative land use and land use change causing GHG emissions such as legal or illegal deforestation where they are produced are included in the Carbon Border Adjustment mechanism to account for their embedded GHG emissions;
Amendment 2202 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls the global responsibility of European food systems and their key role in setting global standards for food safety, labour rights, environmental protection and animal welfare, while not destabilising production in developing countries through exports; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that all food and feed products imported to the EU not only fully meet relevant EU regulations and standards but also do not contribute to negative environmental impacts in other countries, such as the deforestation of the Amazon, and to provide development assistance to support primary producers from developing countries in meeting those standards; welcomes the Commission’s intention to take the environmental impacts of requested import tolerances into account;
Amendment 2244 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Underlines that Free Trade Agreements should never expose the EU agriculture, and food sectors to unfair competition with negative consequences on working conditions and employment; stresses the need to ensure coherence between the ambitious environmental goals of the EU Green Deal and the farm to fork strategy and the potential consequences of Free Trade Agreements; recalls that the respect of labour rights should constitute an essential element of all trade and investment agreements, including possible suspension of the agreement in case of sustained breaches; recalls that the ratification and implementation of the eight ILO Core Labour Standards, as well as compliance with up-to-date ILO conventions, should be a precondition for entering into trade negotiations;
Amendment 2273 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Recalls that Free trade agreements should promote a broad range of fundamental rights, the right to adequate, nutritious and safe food, the right to food security and food sovereignty, the right to a safe working and living environment, the right to livelihood protection, and multiple democratic rights including the rights of workers and their trade unions;
Amendment 3 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that the common agricultural policy (CAP) is the largest item in the EU budget, representing 31 % of the total budgetary expenditure for the 2021-2027 period; stresses the key role of a properly functioning CAP in protecting the financial interests of the EU and its citizens against any misuse of EU funds that can be detrimental to the public image of such a strategic policy, and deprives genuine farmers of a greater delivery of financial support;
Amendment 10 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that the concentration of agricultural income support is mainly driven by area-based direct payments; underlines the need for more targeted support and a better balance between large and small beneficiaries at Member State level, in particular by increasing convergence to 100% and going above the 10% minimum for the redistributive payment;
Amendment 22 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that the Member States are responsible for the EU agricultural funds under shared management with the Commission; considers the new delivery model and the new National Strategic Plans to be a great opportunity to reinforce Member States’ and the Commission’s controls pertaining to the distribution and management of funds, paying particular attention to Member States where Oligarch structures have been detected;
Amendment 38 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that at least 5.5 million euros in farm subsidies was obtained by Italian organised crime, for land they did not own, between 2010 and 2017;
Amendment 39 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Highlights that fraud is often facilitated by individuals within the public administration, making it more difficult to uncover;
Amendment 40 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Underlines that farmers must be protected from intimidation by criminal gangs, who seek to claim subsidies for their land;
Amendment 41 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Notes the work of operation Grande Carro, which discovered a fraud scheme targeting the EAFRD vehicle purchase facility, resulting in fraudulent payments over 9.5 million;
Amendment 42 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 e (new)
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4e. Stresses that Oligarchs structures are as or more financially detrimental to the CAP than organised crime gangs, the identification of these structures is essential to protect genuine farmers;
Amendment 50 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Highlights that Eurojust and OLAF must develop new strategies to target organised crime, receiving agricultural subsidies;
Amendment 56 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Insists on greater resources for investigation, as well as on stronger coordination between the Member States and EU bodies, to ensure that the fight against fraud in agricultural funds is effective; emphasises the need for a comprehensive fraud strategy with a robust fraud risk analysis, while ensuring new checks and documentation requirements do not place an increasing burden on genuine farmers.
Amendment 60 #
2020/2221(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Suggests that more field inspections, by inspectors not from the area, should be carried out in regions where a risk has been identified;
Amendment 11 #
2020/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the Farm to Fork strategy sets out to reduce the use of pesticides by 2030European Union has a responsibility to aid farmers reduce inputs, such as pesticides, AI could play a part in achieving this aim, which cwould be assisted through the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologienot only improve soils, water quality but also reduce costs for farmers;
Amendment 22 #
2020/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the proposal for the next multiannual financial framework provides for EUR 10 billion of the Horizon Europe budget to be allocated to research and development (R&D) in agriculture, which should help to develop technological AI infrastructure for the sectorto assist farmers reduce negative environmental impacts from agriculture, and reduce input costs;
Amendment 43 #
2020/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Believes that workers have valid fears the adoption of AI will lead to job losses, therefore adoption must follow the principles of the just transition, in particular the goal of creating new employment, rather than creating unemployment through technological advancement;
Amendment 85 #
2020/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the family-model of European agriculture shouldmust be preserved and that the introduction of AI technologies cshould be harnessed to support the family model and sustain traditional practices;
Amendment 102 #
2020/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that AI technologies can and should be used to improve the traceability of products, such as an EU blockchain of food, including issues such as origin or production methods;
Amendment 114 #
2020/2216(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on all Member States to include in their common agricultural policy strategic plans and rural development plans measures to support the introduction and wider use of safe and reliable AI and innovative tools at affordable rates for beneficiaries, with training for farmers as an essential element of these measures;
Amendment 2 #
2020/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
— having regard to the Resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on “The impact of Brexit on human rights on the island of Ireland” (Resolution 2464 (2022)1a _________________ 1a 1a. Assembly debate on 13 October 2022 (33rd sitting) (see Doc. 15615, report of the Committee on Political Affairs and Democracy, rapporteur: Mr George Katrougalos). Text adopted by the Assembly on 13 October 2022 (33rd sitting).
Amendment 13 #
2020/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
E a. Whereas the Withdrawal Agreement (Article 2, Irish Protocol) provides that there shall be “no diminution of rights, safeguards or equality of opportunity” for people in Northern Ireland;
Amendment 73 #
2020/2202(INI)
15 a. Notes that Brexit has intensified public discussion about Irish unity, as provided for in the Good Friday Agreement, as a pathway for Northern Ireland to rejoin the EU;
Amendment 74 #
2020/2202(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Invites the European Commission to examine British legislation in order to ensure its compliance with Article 2 of the Protocol, including (but not limited to): a. The Bill of Rights Bill, which disapplies the European Convention on Human Rights; b. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill, which provides an amnesty for state forces and others for criminal acts committed during the conflict; c. The Nationality and Borders Act, which criminalises EU citizens who do not obtain an electronic travel authorisation before crossing the border in Ireland;
Amendment 27 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. EncouragesCalls on the Member States to use the different redistributive tools, going beyond the mandatory requirements, for a fairer distribution of funds and to apply the capping provisions on direct payments;
Amendment 40 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission to request EU member states collect and publish the data in a transparent and user-friendly manner (including the machine readable format) on the EU agriculture funds payments in order to enable public control of final beneficiaries and the use of the EU funds;
Amendment 41 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Notes that government sale or lease auctions are used by oligarch structures to purchase land, exceeding state limits on maximum hectare purchases, enabled by lax checks on such transactions;
Amendment 51 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Recalls Article 60 of EU Regulation 1306/2013, which introduces the Circumvention clause against artificially created conditions for obtaining advantages;
Amendment 52 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Commends the work of the European Court of Auditors and the European Anti-Fraud Office in tackling such structures;
Amendment 53 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Urges greater use of the EU Copernicus ob-servation programme to detect discrepancies between declared and actually cultivated parcels;
Amendment 54 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6 d. Recalls that in Bulgaria in 2019, checks of 22,007 hectares on the ground revealed errors of around 10per cent in the declared areas for subsidising under the coupled support measures;
Amendment 55 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6 e. Deplores acts of physical intimidation against farmers, such as those which took place in Slovakia, and which were investigated by the CONT committee in 2018;
Amendment 56 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 f (new)
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6 f. Recalls that in Romania the authorities have intensified fraud investigations con-cerning EU money in the last four years, identifying a prejudice of more than 100 million EUR, of which almost 90% is related to EU funds;
Amendment 57 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 g (new)
Paragraph 6 g (new)
6 g. Call on the Commission to increase the weight of the political aspect of its evaluation processes, as the issue of conflict of interest as well as of revolving doors in the sector is a serious problem;
Amendment 58 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 h (new)
Paragraph 6 h (new)
6 h. Calls on the Commission to monitor the situation of Agriculture Paying Agencies in the member states and ensure both their formal and informal independence and bring their work in compliance with the EU rules, securing this inter alia through randomly generated visits a better EU control system in place;
Amendment 59 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 i (new)
Paragraph 6 i (new)
6 i. Call for the European bodies responsible for investigating and tackling the misuse of EU funds, including the European Public Prosecutors Office and OLAF, to be equipped with sufficient re-sources to proceed effectively with their responsibilities in terms of the protection of the EU’s budget;
Amendment 60 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 j (new)
Paragraph 6 j (new)
6 j. Call on the Commission to ensure that the Fifth Anti-money laundering directive is implemented fully and correctly in all member states, particularly with regard to the implementations of public registers of beneficial owners and registers of beneficial owners of trusts;
Amendment 61 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 k (new)
Paragraph 6 k (new)
6 k. Recalls the case of Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš, that although he transferred Agrofert into two trust funds in February 2017, he is still the beneficial owner, as concluded by auditors, of Agrofert hold-ing, and thus in conflict of interest;
Amendment 62 #
2020/2126(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 l (new)
Paragraph 6 l (new)
6 l. Recalls the situation of Bulgaria, where 230 biggest beneficiaries received direct subsidies of more than 120 million euro. In other words, 0.33 per cent of the beneficiaries took 15.3 per cent of all payments, while at the same time, 48 per cent of the smallest beneficiaries retained a meagre 3.4 per cent of the payments;
Amendment 80 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Notes the importance of working with third countries, that are commonly used as a transit route between Member States, to ensure EU freight passes without hindrance;
Amendment 84 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Emphasises the urgent need to ensure no new trade barriers are created or retained, as a result of the pandemic, with our closet third country trading partners
Amendment 88 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. Recalls the need, at WTO level, to permanently reduce or preferably remove all tariffs on medical products essential for fighting pandemics such as COVID 19;
Amendment 89 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4 d. Stresses the need to make recovery EU budgetary support for large retailers conditional upon them honouring their contracts with suppliers in the global south, such as in the garment industry;
Amendment 90 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 e (new)
Paragraph 4 e (new)
4 e. Welcomes the Commission's guidelines on screening foreign direct investment, to guard against a predatory takeover of a weakened EU enterprise, as a result of the pandemic;
Amendment 91 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 f (new)
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4 f. Stresses that the COVID-19 pandemic revealed the need for a radical transformation of the entire food system, in order to ensure broader security of food supply and local stable prices, in particular for the most vulnerable populations and based on food sovereignty principles, and to tackle unfair trading practices for the lower participants in the food chain;
Amendment 102 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Recalls that the disjointed process of testing between Member States, for transiting truck drivers, led to significant delays at borders;
Amendment 104 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Highlights the need for the EU and Chinese authorities to work together to reduce the level of COVID 19 attestations required for EU exports to China, such as dairy products;
Amendment 105 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Amendment 106 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Stresses the importance of ensuring that COVID related entry bans imposed on third countries do not affect the flow of goods from one Member State to another, in a situation where a third country is utilised in the transit route
Amendment 107 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5 e. Stresses the need to learn from the pandemic, enter into a post growth debate and prioritise sustainable supply chains;
Amendment 108 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 f (new)
Paragraph 5 f (new)
5 f. Notes the increase in zoonotic epidemics, therefore emphasizing the need to move away from the large scale industrial farming model towards sustainable family farms;
Amendment 109 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 g (new)
Paragraph 5 g (new)
5 g. Highlights the impact COVID 19 has had on our primary producers trading ability and calls on the EU to financially support those most put at risk of bankruptcy by the disruption;
Amendment 110 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 h (new)
Paragraph 5 h (new)
5 h. Notes that the pandemic has led to additional trading disruption for EU countries or territories not connected to mainland Europe, therefore solutions to avoid this in future must be investigated;
Amendment 111 #
2020/2117(INI)
5 i. Underlines that the COVID-19 pandemic has shown extreme vulnerability of the globalised economy and has an unprecedented impact on global and regional trade in foods and agricultural products;
Amendment 112 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 j (new)
Paragraph 5 j (new)
5 j. Highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the EU agricultural sectors that are dependent on supplies from the third countries, and therefore stresses the need to strengthen shorter supply chains, particularly for inputs, local food networks and direct sales, which can be especially beneficial for small and medium-sized producers;
Amendment 113 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 k (new)
Paragraph 5 k (new)
Amendment 114 #
2020/2117(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 l (new)
Paragraph 5 l (new)
5 l. Welcomes the relaxation of the requirements for paper certificates to accompany shipments of food products, during the COVID 19 pandemic, and calls for the permanent acceptance of digital certifications;
Amendment 11 #
2020/2074(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that cohesion policy must support strong climate mainstreaming in agriculture and food-related sectors, not only to protect our planet but also to ensure our farming community has a sustainable future working the land, as farmers are usually on the frontline, in terms of dealing with the negative financial impacts of climatic changes;
Amendment 36 #
2020/2074(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that, in order toto at least reach the target of a 32% reduction in GHG emissions in 2030, allocations from ESI funds supporting the transition towards climate neutrality in all eligible sectors would have to at least double, and 40% of ERDF resources would need to be allocated to the ‘green, low-carbon objective’1 ; __________________ 1 https://www.caneurope.org/docman/climat e-finance-development/3599-funding- climate-and-energy-transition-in-the-eu/file
Amendment 50 #
2020/2074(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the importance of linking regional environmental strategies to ambitious climate targets that go beyond the overall target of achieving a climate- neutral EU by 2050, takpaying into account the potential contribution of the farming, food and forestry sectorparticular attention to utilising farmers and foresters, as the custodians of our landscapes, to help us meet these targets;
Amendment 66 #
2020/2074(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that regional environmental strategies shouldmust support renewable energy production and resource efficiency in the farming, food and forestry sectors; Highlights that such a move would not only be beneficial for biodiversity and GHG emissions but also increase farm incomes, as input costs are continually rising; suggests that the relevant authorities prioritise the most sustainable options, such as wind or solar, and subject bioenergy projects to strict sustainability criteria;
Amendment 86 #
2020/2074(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. HighlightRecalls the importance of re- localising food and feed production, notably the production of plant proteinssuch as plant proteins, through a reform of EU trade policy, in climate change mitigation, as this shortens transport distances and limits deforestation; underline in places like the Amazon; highlights the opportunities offered by cohesion policy and regional environmental strategies in supporting this re-localisation; underlines the importance of initiatives like 'slow food' on achieving this transition;
Amendment 122 #
2020/2074(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that EU macro-regional strategies should helpmust build cooperation in order to solve regional issues linked to climate mitigation and adaptation in the farming, food and forestry sectors, in fields such as flood and fire protection, efficient collective waste management, including with the aim of energy production, making farms more resilient against common risks and the re-localisation of food production.
Amendment 32 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
Amendment 41 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 67 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas while the wider use of an international currency bears privileges and gains, it also implies global responsibilities, dependencies, risks and costs;
Amendment 82 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the purpose of any policy of strengthening the euro should have as its core aim the improvement of the lives of people living in Europe and throughout the world.
Amendment 99 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 113 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 122 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers Brexit both a challenge and opportunity for the euro and notes how its potential use could mitigate the impact of Brexit on the island of Ireland
Amendment 130 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the need for sustainable and sound fiscal and structural growth- enhancing policies that are based on a commitment to credible fiscal rules; calls for further reflection on the adequacydeep reform or abolition of the stability and growth pact framework despitegiven the challenging circumstances especially the additional debt burdens taken on correctly by Member States during the Covid crisis; supports the plan outlined in Next Generation EU to use, in addition to monetary policy, a fiscal impulse, notably borrowing EUR 750 billion from capital markets bonds to finance the recovery and green transition, in addition to the issuance of EUR 100 billion in ‘social’ bonds under the European instrument for temporary support to mitigate unemployment risks in an emergency (SURE), which is intended to preserve employment; applauds the high level of interest that investors have demonstrated in European bonds;
Amendment 165 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Takes note of the role geopolitics plays in global currency competition but chooses not to support the weaponisation of the euro as a tool in this competition;
Amendment 167 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 179 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that a strengthened international role of the euro would enhance the EU’s capability to enforce open strategic autonomy; recommends, therefore, actions intended to both design and implement policy measures that foster the international role of the euro and support market-driven shifts in this direction if they are compatible with the EU’s Climate and social goals;
Amendment 186 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Advocates, in this context and where compatible with the EU’s Climate and social goals;, that policies critical for and conducive to strengthening the international role of the euro should target, inter alia, international trade, fiscal and monetary policy mix, financial services and capital market, payments systems, the climate, the digital transformation, energy, and foreign and security policies;.
Amendment 197 #
2020/2037(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the global prominence of a currency is directly linked to the role that the issuing country has in global trade; stresses that the EU, as one of the world’s largest trading blocs, wcould benefit from a strengthened international role of its currency; underlines that stimulating the choice of the euro in trade will reduce exchange risk and other currency-related costs, especially for European SMEs; observes, however, that despite their position as large buyers and producers, European companies opt to trade in key strategic markets in US dollars; calls, therefore, on the Commission to foster the use of the euro in pricing and invoicing in trade transactions, and to make use of the high potential offered by financial instruments denominated in euros; points, in this context, to the potential offered by supply chains;
Amendment 20 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes it to be in both Parties’ mutual interests to establish an ambitious future economic partnership covering a wide number of sectors; underlines that, in any case, a level playing field must be ensured and EU standards safeguarded in order to avoid a ‘race to the bottom’ and the acquisition of unfair competitive advantages through the undercutting of levels of protection or other regulatory divergences; considers that any future framework should safeguard fair competition, workers' rights, investor and consumer protection, and the integrity of the single market, while respecting the EU’s regulatory regime and decision- making autonomy; notes in this regard the potential distortion of the economy in border areas in Ireland by the absence of the full panoply of level playing field provisions, particularly with regard to labour and social standards;
Amendment 64 #
2020/2023(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Believes that free movement of EU nationals - including future frontier workers - and free movement of services on the island of Ireland are important in order to limit damage to the all-island economy and a future agreement should cover this issue;
Amendment 21 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas in 2018 42% of workplace accidents in the EU involved workers over 45 years of age, therefore workplace safety must consider the impact ageing has on a workforce;
Amendment 41 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
(1) Believes that a new approach to mentorship and partnership must be found to stop a brain-drain, as advanced skills become more concentrated in the older element of the workforce;
Amendment 42 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 – point 2 (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 2 (new)
(2) Considers it important employment legislation promotes working time policies which meet the needs of an ageing workforce, in particular, flexibility of shift working periods;
Amendment 52 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that an ageing workforce and the lack of generational renewal constitute a more serious issue in agriculture than in other sectors; believes that addressing market uncertainty, ending the system of historic entitlement and tackling and lack of profitability in farming enterprises are key to reversing this trend;
Amendment 236 #
2020/0267(COD)
(40) FiveTwo years after the entry into application of this Regulation, ESMA should report to the Commission on this pilot regime for DLT market infrastructures, including on the potential benefits linked to the use of DLT, the risks raised and the technical difficulties. Based on ESMA’s report, the Commission should report to the Council and European Parliament. This report should assess the costs and benefits of extending this regime on DLT market infrastructures for another period of time, extending this regime to new type of financial instruments, making this regime permanent with or without modifications, bringing modifications to the Union financial services legislation or terminating this regimeshow how it intends to incorporate the lessons learned into existing legislation.
Amendment 292 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The total market value of DLT transferable securities recorded in a CSD operating a DLT securities settlement system shall not exceed EUR 21.5 billion. Where a DLT MTF records the DLT transferable securities instead of a CSD, in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 4, the total market value of the DLT transferable securities recorded by the investment firm or market operator operating the DLT MTF shall not exceed EUR 21.5 billion.
Amendment 297 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Where the total market value of the DLT transferable securities reported under paragraph 1, has reached EUR 21.25 billion, the investment firm or market operator operating the DLT MTF concerned, or the CSD operating the DLT securities settlement system concerned shall activate the transition strategy, referred to in Article 6(6). They shall notify the competent authority of the activation of their transition strategy, in their monthly report and of the time-horizon for such transition.
Amendment 299 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The competent authority concerned may permit the DLT market infrastructure concerned to continue to operate until the total market value of the DLT transferable securities reported under paragraph 1 reaches EUR 21.75 billion provided that such leeway is requested by the operator of the DLT market infrastructure concerned and that it is objectively necessary for the orderly implementation of the transition strategy.
Amendment 469 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. FiveTwo years from the entry into application of this Regulation, at the latest, ESMA shall present a report to the Commission on:
Amendment 485 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Based on the report referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and Council including a cost-benefit analysis on whether the regime for DLT market infrastructures under this Regulation should be:showing how it intends to incorporate the lessons learned into existing legislation.
Amendment 487 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 489 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 490 #
Amendment 491 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 495 #
Amendment 496 #
2020/0267(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 76 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups should not be subject to excessive administrative burdens. Offers to the public of crypto- assets in the Union that do not exceed an adequate aggregate threshold over a period of 12 months should therefore be exempted from the obligation to draw up a crypto-asset white paper. However, EU horizontal legislation ensuring consumer protection, such as Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council38 , Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council39 or the Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts40 , including any information obligations contained therein, remain applicable to these offers to the public of crypto-assets where involving business-to- consumer relations. _________________ 38Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64). 39Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to- consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 22) 40Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ L 95, 21.4.1993, p. 29).
Amendment 81 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) In order to enable supervision, issuers of crypto-assets should, before any public offer of crypto-assets in the Union or before those crypto-assets are admitted to trading on a trading platform for crypto- assets, notify their crypto-asset white paper and, where applicable, their marketing communications, to the competent authority of the Member State where they have their registered office or a branch. Issuers that are established in a third country should notify their crypto-asset white paper, and, where applicable, their marketing communication, to the competent authority of the Member State where the crypto-assets are intended to be offered or where the admission to trading on a trading platform for crypto-assets is sought in the first place. In both cases, any public offer or admission to trading or a trading platform is dependent on authorisation by the competent authority.
Amendment 83 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Undue administrative burdens should be avoided. Competent authorities should therefore not be required to approve a crypto-asset white paper before its publication. Competent authorities should, however, after publication, have the power to request that additional information is included in the crypto-asset white paper, and, where applicable, in the marketing communications.
Amendment 84 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Competent authorities should be able to suspend or prohibit a public offer of crypto-assets or the admission of such crypto-assets to trading on a trading platform for crypto-assets where such an offer to the public or an admission to trading does not comply with the applicable requirements. Competent authorities should also have the power to publish a warning that an issuer has failed to meet those requirements, either on its website and/or through a press release.
Amendment 85 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Crypto-asset white papers and, where applicable, marketing communications that have been duly notified to a competent authority and authorised by a competent authority should be published, after which issuers of crypto- assets should be allowed to offer their crypto-assets throughout the Union and to seek admission for trading such crypto- assets on a trading platform for crypto- assets.
Amendment 271 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) has received authorisation from a competent authority;
Amendment 307 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a detailed description of the issuer and a presenta, including a summary of key financial information regarding the issuer and a detailed description of the main participants involved in the project's design and development;
Amendment 312 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) if different from the issuer, the identification of the offeror, a description of the offeror’s relationship with the issuer, and a summary of key financial information regarding the offeror;
Amendment 319 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) an independent assessment of the likely energy consumption of the crypto- asset where the "proof of work" model is used;
Amendment 335 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point d a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – point d a (new)
(da) public protection schemes protecting the value of crypto assets and public compensation schemes do not exist and crypto-assets are not covered by public investor compensation or deposit guarantee schemes;
Amendment 349 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Competent authorities shall not require an ex ante approval of a crypto- asset white paper, norand of any marketing communications relating to it before their publication.
Amendment 361 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Issuers of crypto-assets, other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, shall publish their crypto-asset white paper, and, where applicable, their marketing communications, following authorisation, on their website, which shall be publicly accessible, by no later than the starting date of the offer to the public of those crypto- assets or the admission of those crypto- assets to trading on a trading platform for crypto-assets. The crypto-asset white paper, and, where applicable, the marketing communications, shall remain available on the issuer’s website for as long as the crypto-assets are held by the public.
Amendment 366 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Amendment 368 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Issuers of crypto-assets, other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, shall modify their published crypto-asset white paper, and, where applicable, published marketing communications, to describe any change or new fact that is likely to have a significant influence on the purchase decision of any potential purchaser of such crypto-assets, or on the decision of holders of such crypto-assets to sell or exchange such crypto-assets. Any such modification requires authorisation from the competent authority.
Amendment 505 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. Issuers of asset-references tokens shall at all times constitute and maintain a reserve of assets. The aggregate value of reserve assets shall always be at least equal to the aggregate face value of the claims on the issuer from holders of asset- referenced tokens in circulation
Amendment 512 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 5
Article 32 – paragraph 5
5. Without prejudice to Article 30(11), issuers of asset-referenced tokens shall mandate an independent audit of the reserve assets every six months, as of the date of its authorisation as referred to in Article 19. The result of the audit shall be notified to the competent authority without delay, at the latest within six weeks of the reference date of the valuation. The result of the audit shall be published within two weeks of the date of notification to the competent authority. The competent authority may instruct the issuer to delay the publication in the event that (a) the issuer has been required to implement recovery arrangement or measures in accordance with this regulation (b) the issuer has been required to implement an orderly wind-down of its activities in accordance with this regulation ; (c) it is deemed necessary to protect the economic interests of holders of the asset- referenced token; (d) it is deemed necessary to avoid a significant adverse effect on the financial system of the home Member State or another Member State.
Amendment 541 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Article 35 – paragraph 1
1. Issuers of asset-referenced tokens shall establish, maintain and implement clear and detailed policies and procedurredeem these tokens at the request on the rights granted to holders of asset- referenced tokens, including any direct claim or redemption rights on the issf any holder at all times at a price that is not lower than the face valuer of those asset-referenced tokens or on the reserve assetse holder’s claim on the issuer.
Amendment 549 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
2. Where holders of asset-referenced tokens are granted rights as referred to in paragraph 1, issuers of asset-referenced tokens shall establish a policy setting outBy way of derogation from paragraph 1:
Amendment 554 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the conditions, including thresholds, periods and timeframes, for holders of asset-referenced tokens to exercise those rights;issuer of an asset-referenced token may, in accordance with the applicable national law and subject to the conditions set out in the crypto-asset white paper, temporarily suspend the redemption of its tokens. In the event of a temporary suspension, the issuer shall, without delay, communicate its decision to its home Member State competent authorities.
Amendment 556 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1– point b
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1– point b
(b) the mechanisms and procedurissuer’s home Member State may allow its competent authorities to ensurequire the redemptsuspension of the asset- referencedredemption of tokens, including in stressed market circumstances, in case of an orderly wind-down of the issuer of asset- the interest of the token holders or of the public. The temporary suspension referencred tokens as referred to in Article 42, or in case of a cessation of activities by such issuer; in point (a) of the first subparagraph shall be provided for only in exceptional cases where circumstances so require and where suspension is justified having regard to the interests of the token holders.
Amendment 557 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Amendment 561 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1– point d
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1– point d
Amendment 563 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Amendment 569 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Issuers of asset-referenced tokens shall establish a policy setting out:(a) the conditions, including thresholds, periods and timeframes, for holders of asset- referenced tokens to exercise those rights; (b) the mechanisms and procedures to ensure the redemption of the asset- referenced tokens, including in stressed market circumstances, or in case of an orderly redemption of asset-referenced tokens; (c) the valuation, or the principles of valuation, of the asset-referenced tokens and of the reserve assets when those rights are exercised by the holder of asset- referenced tokens; (d) the settlement conditions when those rights are exercised
Amendment 571 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
Article 35 – paragraph 3
Amendment 582 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 585 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 35 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 594 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) the conditions which need to be met by the issuer after the adoption of the temporary suspension of the redemption of tokens as referred to in paragraph 2(a), once the suspension has been decided.
Amendment 695 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 6
Article 44 – paragraph 6
6. Redemption may be subject to a fee only. if stated in the crypto-asset white paper and only in any of the following cases: (a) where redemption is requested before the termination of the contract; (b) where the contract provides for a termination date and the electronic money holder terminates the contract before that date; or (c) where redemption is requested more than one year after the date of termination of the contract. Any such fee shall be proportionate and commensurate with the actual costs incurred by issuers of e-money tokens.
Amendment 844 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Crypto-asset service providers shall, at all times, have in place prudential safeguards equal to an amount of at least the higher of the followingmeet, at least, the requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities, as applicable:
Amendment 846 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the amount of permanent minimum capital requirements indicated in Annex IV, depending on the nature of the crypto-asset services providedfor credit institutions authorised to provide crypto-asset services in accordance with this regulation the requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities in accordance with Regulation (EU) 575/2013 and Directive 2013/36/EU;
Amendment 847 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) one quarter of the fixed overheads of the preceding year, reviewed annuallyfor investment firms authorised to provide crypto-asset services in accordance with this regulation the requirements for initial capital and own funds in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 and Directive 2019/2034/EU;
Amendment 848 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) firms authorised to provide crypto- asset services in accordance with this regulation that are covered under (a) and (b) the requirements for initial capital and own funds in accordance with Directive 2009/110/EC.
Amendment 849 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 2
Article 60 – paragraph 2
Amendment 855 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 3
Article 60 – paragraph 3
Amendment 856 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 4
Article 60 – paragraph 4
Amendment 862 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 5
Article 60 – paragraph 5
Amendment 864 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 6
Article 60 – paragraph 6
Amendment 936 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1
Article 70 – paragraph 1
1. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised to execute orders for crypto- assets on behalf of third parties shall take all necessary steps to obtain, when executing orders, the best possible result for their clients taking into account the best execution factors of price, costs, speed, likelihood of execution and settlement, size, nature or any other consideration relevant to the execution of the order, unless the crypto-asset service provider concerned executes orders for crypto-assets following specific instructions given by its clients. Where a crypto-asset service provider executes an order on behalf of a retail client, the best possible result shall be determined in terms of the total consideration, representing the price of the crypto-assets and the costs relating to execution, which shall include all expenses incurred by the client which are directly relating to the execution of the order, including execution venue fees, clearing and settlement fees and any other fees paid to third parties involved in the execution of the order.
Amendment 938 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 70 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised to execute orders for crypto-assets on behalf of third parties shall ask the client or potential client to provide information regarding that person’s knowledge and experience in crypto-assets, the client’s objectives, risk tolerance, financial situation including its the ability to bear losses, and basic understanding of risks involved in purchasing crypto-assets so as to enable the crypto-asset service provider to assess whether the crypto-asset envisaged is appropriate for the client. Where the crypto-asset service provider considers, on the basis of the information received under the first subparagraph, that the crypto-asset is not appropriate to the client or potential client, it shall warn the client or potential client.
Amendment 950 #
2020/0265(COD)
1. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised to provide advice on crypto- assets shall assess the compatibility of such crypto-assets with the requirements and preferences demands and needs of the clients or potential client and recommend them only when this isey are suitable for and in the interest of the clients or potential client and, in particular, are in accordance with his or her risk tolerance and ability to bear losses.
Amendment 953 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 73 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised to provide advice on crypto-assets shall in good time before providing advice on crypto-assets inform potential clients: (a) whether or not the advice is provided on an independent basis; (b) whether the advice is based on a broad or on a more restricted analysis of different crypto-assets and, in particular, whether the range is limited to crypto- assets issued or offered by entities having close links with the crypto-asset service provider or any other legal or economic relationships, such as contractual relationships, so close as to pose a risk of impairing the independent basis of the advice provided; Crypto-asset service providers shall also provide potential clients with information on all costs and associated charges, including the cost of advice, where relevant, the cost of crypto-assets recommended or marketed to the client and how the client may pay for it, also encompassing any third-party payments.
Amendment 956 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised to provide advice on crypto- assets shall warn clients that, due to their tradability, the value of crypto-assets may fluctuate, that the crypto-assets may lose their value in part or in full, that the crypto-assets may not always be transferable and that the crypto-assets may not be liquid.
Amendment 962 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 7 – point a
Article 73 – paragraph 7 – point a
(a) specify the clients’ demands and needrequirements and preferences;
Amendment 1005 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 82 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. In determining, as per Title II, whether to authorise a crypto-asset competent authorities shall take into account the likely energy consumption of the proposal and reject any proposed crypto-asset that is reliant on technology which uses excessive energy. In determining this, the competent authority may consult as it sees fit and take into account European Union energy and climate policies.
Amendment 1141 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 123 – paragraph 1
Article 123 – paragraph 1
1. Articles 4 to 14 shall not apply to cCrypto-assets, other than asset- referenced tokens and e-money tokens, which were offered to the public in the Union or admitted to trading on a trading platform for crypto-assets before [please insert date of entry into application] can operate for a period of 6 months after [please insert date of entry into application] before Articles 4 to 14 shall apply.
Amendment 18 #
Amendment 25 #
Amendment 2 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in particular Articles 8 and 25 thereof,
Amendment 144 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to prioritise emissions reductions through housing renovation in the social housing sector and for worst performing buildings in the Renovation Wave, while tackling inadequate housing and housing accessibility and eliminating energy poverty in order to ensure a socially just transition to a climate-neutral economy that leaves no one behind; stresses, therefore, that tenants and owner-occupiers should be fully informed and involved in renovation projects and should not see overall costs increase because of them; calls, therefore, for the cost to the tenant not to exceed the value of the energy savings made by the tenant as a result of the renovations; stresses the need to protect tenants from eviction during housing renovations;
Amendment 175 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for an EU-level goal of ending homelessness by 2030; calls on the Commission to take stronger action to support Member States in reducing and eradicating homelessness as a priority in the context of the action plan on the EPSR; calls on the Commission to propose an EU framework for national homelessness strategies; calls on the Member States to prioritise the provision of permanent housing to homeless people and those who have most difficulty finding accommodation; stresses the importance of reliable data collection on homelessness;
Amendment 181 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that homelessness is also caused and perpetuated by the market and austerity policies pursued by the European Union; urges the European Union to adopt genuine social policies and ambitious employment measures to enable all citizens to live in dignity, without which homelessness can never be eradicated;
Amendment 280 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to put in place legal provisions to protect tenants and owner-occupiers from eviction and to ensure security of tenure by favouring long-term rental contracts as the default option, together with a rent transparency andobligation and binding rent control measures;
Amendment 286 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Points out that 25.1% of European private tenants spend over 40% of their income on rent; points out that rents are constantly increasing; considers that rents must be subject to controls and then reduced so that housing is truly affordable for all;
Amendment 287 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls for a ban on the eviction of tenants and owner-occupiers without rehousing; stresses that people who are evicted should be able to assert their rights in a court, particularly against banks where the repayment amount demanded by the bank is grossly unfair;
Amendment 288 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Invites the Member States to pursue housing policies that are based on the principle of neutrality between home ownership, private rented accommodation and rented social housing; callpoints out, too, that the rules onf the Commission to respect this principle in the European SemesterEuropean Semester have reduced investment in affordable housing; calls for the repeal of the European Semester so that the European Union and the Member States have the leeway needed to fund public and social investments, particularly in affordable housing, to the extent necessary;
Amendment 300 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes with concern the increased financialisation of the housing market, in particular in cities, whereby investors treat housing as a tradable asset rather than a human right; points out that the Covid-19 crisis has drawn attention to the fact that essential workers and public officials have been forced to move out of town centres because prices have increased as a result of the financialisation of the housing market; calls on the Commission to assess the contribution of EU policies and regulations to financialisation of the housing market and the ability of national and local authorities to ensure the right to housing and, where appropriate, to put forward legislative proposals to counter financialisation of the housing market by mid-2021; calls for the creation of a transparency register for property developers and private and corporate landlords to prevent speculation and because everyone has the right to know who is benefiting from their rent; calls on the Member States and local authorities to put in place taxation measures to counter speculative investment, and to develop urban and rural planning policies that favour affordable housing, social mix and social cohesion;
Amendment 320 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Points out that over 11 million homes in the European Union are empty; emphasises that those homes could accommodate everyone who is homeless and most of those suffering from severe housing deprivation in the European Union; points out that empty homes contribute to the decline in housing supply and therefore to the increase in prices and speculation; calls on the Member States to put in place binding legislation so that empty homes are put on the rental market in a condition that meets decent housing criteria;
Amendment 331 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to close the investment gap for affordable housing as a matter of priority; calls in this regard for a reform of the Stability and Growth Pact allowing for increased fiscal space for sustainable public investments, in particular in affordable housing; calls, in particular, for investments made in affordable housing to be exempt from the Maastricht criteria as affordable housing is never a debt but always an investment; calls, furthermore, for a harmonised accounting for amortisation methodology for affordable housing investments;
Amendment 341 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Urges the Commission to adapt the target group definition of social and publicly funded housing in the rules on services of general economic interest, so as to allow national, regional and local authorities to support housing for all groups whose needs for decent and affordable housing cannot be met within market conditions, while also ensuring that funding is not steered away from the most disadvantaged, in order to unblock investment and ensure affordable housing, create socially diverse neighbourhoods and enhance social cohesion; calls on the Commission to authorise State aid for affordable housing for any target group;
Amendment 355 #
2019/2187(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Deplores the fact that local stakeholders and smaller organisations do not always know about public funding and that European procedures can seem remote or complex; proposes the creation of a single fund to achieve synergies by pooling existing donor funds, thereby allowing local stakeholders and smaller organisations to clearly identify those funds;