Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CULT | CAVADA Jean-Marie ( PPE) | KAMMEREVERT Petra ( S&D), LØKKEGAARD Morten ( ALDE), TRÜPEL Helga ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | BORYS Piotr ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | BADIA I CUTCHET Maria ( S&D) | Ivo BELET ( PPE), Sajjad KARIM ( ECR), Jens ROHDE ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union.
Legal content, accessibility and collective rights management: Parliament stresses the need to make legal content more attractive, and to improve the online availability of audiovisual works, including both subtitled works and works in all the official languages of the EU. Digital services, such as video streaming, should be made available to all EU citizens irrespective of the Member State in which they are located. Members call on the Commission to request that European digital companies remove geographical controls (e.g. IP address blocking) across the Union and allow the purchase of digital services from outside the consumer’s Member State of origin. It asks the Commission to draft an analysis of the application of the Cable and Satellite Directive to digital distribution.
Parliament suggests adopting a comprehensive approach at EU level which should involve greater cooperation between rights‑holders, online distribution platforms and internet service providers, so as to facilitate user-friendly and competitive access to audiovisual content. It stresses the importance of net neutrality in order to guarantee equal access to high‑speed networks, which is crucial to the quality of legitimate online audiovisual services.
Members emphasise that the digital divide between Member States or regions of the EU represents a serious barrier to the development of the digital single market. They call, therefore, for the expansion of broadband internet access throughout the EU with a view to stimulating access to online services and new technologies. Members observe that the development of cross-border services is entirely possible, provided that business platforms are prepared to acquire, by contractual means, the rights to exploit one or more territories, since it must be remembered that territorial systems are natural markets in the audiovisual sector.
On collective management, Members call on the Commission to present a legislative initiative for the collective management of copyright , aimed at ensuring better accountability, transparency and governance on the part of collective rights management societies, along with efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, and at clarifying and simplifying licensing systems in the music sector. They stress the need to operate a clear distinction between licensing practices for different types of content, notably between audiovisual/cinematographic and musical works. The report requires an analysis of whether the principle of mutual recognition could be applied to digital goods in the same manner as to physical goods.
Unauthorised use: Parliament calls on the Commission to afford internet users legal certainty when they are using streamed services and to consider, in particular, ways to prevent the use of payment systems and the funding of such services through advertising on pay platforms offering unauthorised downloading and streaming services. It calls on Member States to promote respect for authors' and neighbouring rights and to combat the provision of unauthorised content.
Where legal alternatives do exist, online copyright infringement remains an issue and therefore the legal online availability of copyrighted cultural material needs to be supplemented with smarter online enforcement of copyright.
Remuneration: Members maintain that it is essential to guarantee authors and performers remuneration that is fair and proportional to all forms of exploitation of their works, especially online exploitation, and therefore calls upon the Member States to ban buyout contracts, which contradict this principle. They call on the Commission urgently to present a study considering disparities in the different remuneration mechanisms for authors and performers which are in use at the national level, in order to draw up a list of best practices. Furthermore, they want the bargaining position of authors and performers vis-à-vis producers to be rebalanced by providing authors and performers with an unwaivable right to remuneration for all forms of exploitation of their works, including ongoing remuneration where they have transferred their exclusive 'making available' right to a producer. Members maintain that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights‑holders is by offering a choice, as preferred, among collective bargaining agreements (including agreed standard contracts), extended collective licences and collective management organisations.
Licensing: the resolution points out that multi-territorial or pan-European licensing mechanisms should remain voluntary and that linguistic and cultural differences between Member States, along with variations in national rules unrelated to copyright law, carry their own specific challenges. Members believe, therefore, that a flexible approach regarding pan-European licensing must be adopted, while protecting rights‑holders and progressing towards the digital single market. They take the view that, if sustainable multi-territorial licensing can be encouraged in the digital single market for audiovisual works, this should facilitate market-driven initiatives.
Interoperability: Parliament calls on Member States to ensure that collective rights management is based on effective, functional and interoperable systems. It calls on the Commission to consider ways to encourage network operators to standardise their technical tools and reverse the current trend of removing responsibility from these operators regarding consumer protection, implementation of intellectual property rights and ensuring Internet privacy.
Furthermore, Members stress that consideration should be given to applying a reduced rate of VAT to the digital distribution of cultural goods and services in order to eliminate the discrepancies between online and offline services. They take the view that the application of reduced VAT rates for online cultural content sold by a provider established in the EU to a consumer resident in the EU would boost the attractiveness of digital platforms.
Protection and promotion of audiovisual works: Parliament calls on the Commission:
to find mechanisms for encouraging access to archived audiovisual material held by Europe’s film heritage institutions; to promote solutions aimed at supporting the digitisation, preservation and educational availability of these works, including across borders.
Education: Members stress the importance of promoting digital skills and media literacy for all EU citizens, and also that consumers should be properly informed about any issues relating to intellectual property rights that may arise when using file-sharing services in the context of cloud-computing services.
MEDIA 2014-2020: lastly, Parliament stresses that it is vital for MEDIA to continue to exist as a specific programme focusing solely on the audiovisual sector.
The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report by Jean-Marie CAVADA (EPP, FR) on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union.
Legal content, accessibility and collective rights management : the committee stresses the need to make legal content more attractive, and to improve the online availability of audiovisual works, including both subtitled works and works in all the official languages of the EU. Digital services, such as video streaming, should be made available to all EU citizens irrespective of the Member State in which they are located. Members call on the Commission to request that European digital companies remove geographical controls (e.g. IP address blocking) across the Union and allow the purchase of digital services from outside the consumer’s Member State of origin. It asks the Commission to draft an analysis of the application of the Cable and Satellite Directive to digital distribution.
The committee suggests adopting a comprehensive approach at EU level which should involve greater cooperation between rights‑holders, online distribution platforms and internet service providers, so as to facilitate user-friendly and competitive access to audiovisual content. It stresses the importance of net neutrality in order to guarantee equal access to high‑speed networks, which is crucial to the quality of legitimate online audiovisual services.
Members emphasise that the digital divide between Member States or regions of the EU represents a serious barrier to the development of the digital single market. They call, therefore, for the expansion of broadband internet access throughout the EU with a view to stimulating access to online services and new technologies.
On collective management, Members call on the Commission to present a legislative initiative for the collective management of copyright, aimed at ensuring better accountability, transparency and governance on the part of collective rights management societies, along with efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, and at clarifying and simplifying licensing systems in the music sector. They stress the need to operate a clear distinction between licensing practices for different types of content, notably between audiovisual/cinematographic and musical works.
On the question of convergence of the media , Members call for new solutions to be found, not only in terms of authors ’ rights, but also in terms of entertainment law and urge the European Commission to check to what extent various regulations for linear and non-linear services in Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services are still up-to-date, taking the latest technological developments into consideration. They suggests that consideration be given to new forms of cross-programme and cross-platform clearing systems, with the aid of which interest could be awoken in high-quality content, which would also increase the linear programme quality and the online variety without burdening the revenue of private broadcasters.
The report calls for an analysis of whether the principle of mutual recognition could be applied to digital goods in the same manner as to physical goods.
Unauthorised use: the committee alls on the Commission to afford internet users legal certainty when they are using streamed services and to consider, in particular, ways to prevent the use of payment systems and the funding of such services through advertising on pay platforms offering unauthorised downloading and streaming services. It calls on Member States to promote respect for authors' and neighbouring rights and to combat the provision of unauthorised content .
Where legal alternatives do exist, online copyright infringement remains an issue and therefore the legal online availability of copyrighted cultural material needs to be supplemented with smarter online enforcement of copyright.
Remuneration: Members maintain that it is essential to guarantee authors and performers remuneration that is fair and proportional to all forms of exploitation of their works, especially online exploitation, and therefore calls upon the Member States to ban buyout contracts, which contradict this principle. They call on the Commission urgently to present a study considering disparities in the different remuneration mechanisms for authors and performers which are in use at the national level, in order to draw up a list of best practices. Furthermore, they want the bargaining position of authors and performers vis-à-vis producers to be rebalanced by providing authors and performers with an unwaivable right to remuneration for all forms of exploitation of their works, including ongoing remuneration where they have transferred their exclusive 'making available' right to a producer. Members maintain that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights‑holders is by offering a choice, as preferred, among collective bargaining agreements (including agreed standard contracts), extended collective licences and collective management organisations.
Licensing: the report points out that multi-territorial or pan-European licensing mechanisms should remain voluntary and that linguistic and cultural differences between Member States, along with variations in national rules unrelated to copyright law, carry their own specific challenges. Members believe, therefore, that a flexible approach regarding pan-European licensing must be adopted, while protecting rights‑holders and progressing towards the digital single market. They take the view that, if sustainable multi-territorial licensing can be encouraged in the digital single market for audiovisual works, this should facilitate market-driven initiatives.
Interoperability: the committee calls on Member States to ensure that collective rights management is based on effective, functional and interoperable systems. It calls on the Commission to consider ways to encourage network operators to standardise their technical tools and reverse the current trend of removing responsibility from these operators regarding consumer protection, implementation of intellectual property rights and ensuring Internet privacy.
Furthermore, Members stress that consideration should be given to applying a reduced rate of VAT to the digital distribution of cultural goods and services in order to eliminate the discrepancies between online and offline services. They take the view that the application of reduced VAT rates for online cultural content sold by a provider established in the EU to a consumer resident in the EU would boost the attractiveness of digital platforms, as they indicated in their resolutions of 17 November 2011 on the modernisation of VAT legislation in order to boost the digital single market and of 13 October 2011 on the future of VAT .
Protection and promotion of audiovisual works: the report calls on the Commission:
· to find mechanisms for encouraging access to archived audiovisual material held by Europe’s film heritage institutions;
· to promote solutions aimed at supporting the digitisation, preservation and educational availability of these works, including across borders.
Education: Members stress the importance of promoting digital skills and media literacy for all EU citizens, and also that consumers should be properly informed about any issues relating to intellectual property rights that may arise when using file-sharing services in the context of cloud-computing services.
MEDIA 2014-2020: lastly, the committee stresses that it is vital for MEDIA to continue to exist as a specific programme focusing solely on the audiovisual sector.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)766/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0324/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0262/2012
- Committee opinion: PE485.840
- Committee opinion: PE478.423
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE487.679
- Committee draft report: PE480.505
- Committee draft report: PE480.505
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE487.679
- Committee opinion: PE478.423
- Committee opinion: PE485.840
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)766/2
Amendments | Dossier |
234 |
2011/2313(INI)
2012/03/08
ITRE
33 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that greater attention should be given to improv
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that in order to create a sustainable online market for audiovisual works, easy access to high quality online content should be the focus of the audiovisual sector;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Supports the creation of a legal framework for the facilitation of digitalisation and cross-border dissemination of orphan works on the digital single market, this being one of the key actions identified in the Digital Agenda for Europe, which is part of the Europe 2020 Strategy;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Recalls the importance of the online library Europeana and believes that greater attention should be given to its supply and visibility by the member states and by the cultural institutions;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Requests to take into account the principle of net neutrality in view of eliminating the restrictions to certain content, websites, platforms, technologies or means of communication, in order to protect the freedom of access for all citizens to audiovisual works distributed online, and also to protect the competition on the market;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Underlines that the digital divide between Member States or regions of the EU represents a serious barrier to the development of the digital single market; therefore, calls for the expansion of broadband internet access throughout the EU in view of stimulating access to online services and to new technologies;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Considers that the digitalization and the preservation of cultural resources, as well as the enhanced access to them, offer great economic and social opportunities and represent an essential condition for the future development of Europe's cultural and creative capacities and for its industrial presence in this field. Thus supports the Commission's Recommendation from 27 October 2011 on digitalization and online accessibility to digital works and the digital preservation, as well as the proposal to create an up-to-date package of measures in this direction;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the necessity to ensure proper remuneration for rights-holders, for on-line distribution of audiovisual materials
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the necessity to ensure proper remuneration for rights-holders, for on-line distribution of audiovisual materials
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the necessity to ensure the balance between proper remuneration for rights-holders
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the fragmentation of the on-line market, marked for example by technological barriers, complexity of licensing procedures, differences in methods of payment, cultural and language differences between Member States and variations in certain taxes which apply to goods and services, including VAT rates, necessitates a transparent, flexible and harmonised approach at European level in order to
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the necessity to ensure proper and fair remuneration for all rights- holders, for on-line
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the necessity to ensure proper remuneration for rights-holders, for on-line distribution of audiovisual materials, but believes that there is a need for comprehensive studies at European level in order to identify where problems are located and to find clear and efficient mechanisms to solve them; calls for the competitiveness of national businesses in the single market to be increased and for the balance between rights holders and society to be restored;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Suggests, in this context, th
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Suggests, in this context, the
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls the rapid growth in the volume of user-created content on the internet and the contribution this makes to creativity; recognises that the value of this sector is permanently increasing; notes that the exchange of information is a prerequisite for this and that this fact should be taken into account; recalls, in this context, that although copyright protection stimulates investment and content production, some carefully analysed exceptions are equally essential to ensure access to knowledge, creation and innovation;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the new Creative Europe Programme proposed by the EC, which underlines that online distribution is also having a massive and positive impact for distributing audiovisual works especially for reaching new audiences in Europe and beyond, and for enhancing the social cohesion;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that piracy and the illegal distribution of audiovisual and other copyrighted cultural content online will continue to exist as long as European policy-makers and industry do not adapt to the changing circumstances in a manner that facilitates the emergence of widely and readily available legal platforms for on-demand cultural content; recognises however that where legal alternatives do exist, piracy remains an issue and therefore the legal online availability of copyrighted cultural material needs to be supplemented with strengthened online enforcement of copyright in the full respect of fundamental rights, notably the freedom of information and of speech, protection of personal data and the right to privacy as well as the mere conduit principle;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls upon the Commission to speed up the work on the proposal for a Directive on Collective Rights Management, that should also take into account the specificities of the audiovisual sector;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Stresses the fact that the Commission report on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC established differences in implementation in the Member States of the provisions of Articles 5, 6 and 8, leading to different interpretations and decisions from the courts of Member States; recalls that these have become part of the specific body of case law;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Requests the Commission to continue the rigorous monitoring of the application of Directive 2001/29/EC and the periodic reporting of findings to the European Parliament and Council;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Invites the Commission to revise Directive 2001/29/EC, after consulting all the relevant stakeholders, in such a way that the provisions of Articles 5, 6 and 8 are worded more precisely, with a view to ensuring the harmonisation at Community level of the legal framework for copyright protection in the information society;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the growing need to promote the emergence of legal and attractive on- line supply and encourage innovation and hence the essential flexibility of new methods of distribution in order to allow the emergence of new business model; stresses that these legal and attractive on- line offers should be based on a comprehensive, EU-level approach, with all interested parties involved; the aim of this new legal on-line supply should be to encourage artistic creation and protect the interests of creators, but equally, to ensure the widest possible access of the public to the on-line distribution of audiovisual works in the EU;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stress that digital services, such as video streaming services, should be made available to all EU citizens irrespective of which Member State they are located; calls on the Commission to request that European digital companies remove geographical controls (e.g. IP address blocking) for the whole Union and allow the purchase of digital services from outside the Member State of origin; asks the Commission to draft an analysis of the application of the cable and satellite directive1 to digital distribution; __________________ 1 Directive 93/83/EEC
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that licensing procedures should be simplified in order to take full advantage of the new possibilities offered, whilst guaranteeing a well-balanced system of rights protection which takes account of the interests of both creators and consumers;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Insists that all proposed measures should take into account the characteristics of the sector and the interests of the different stakeholders;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Asks the Commission to present an analysis if the principle of mutual recognition could be applied to digital goods in the same manner as physical goods; believes that digital goods should be accessible to all EU citizen access regardless of their Member State of residence or the Member State of origin;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that greater attention should be given to improv
source: PE-483.685
2012/04/03
JURI
36 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses that online use can represent a real opportunity for better diffusion and distribution of European works, particularly audiovisual works, in conditions where legal supply can develop in an environment of healthy competition which effectively tackles the illegal supply of protected works;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that t
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses the need to ensure legal certainty with regard to the law applicable to collective licensing for the online multi- territorial use of audiovisual content; believes that this could be achieved by providing for a system where the law in which the media service provider is established should be applied, while preserving the interests of all right holders, granting them fair remuneration for the service and taking account of all aspects for the service concerned and leaving intact the right for the audiovisual and cinema producers to conclude agreements with the media service providers on an individual basis;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls on the Commission to carry out a study gathering data on the actual consumer cross-border demand for audiovisual content; considers such data necessary to assess the added value of multi-territorial licensing;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Considers that the encouragement, promotion and sustainability of multi- territorial licensing in the digital single market for audiovisual works should facilitate market-driven initiatives; underlines that digital technologies provide new and innovative ways to customise and enrich the offer for each market and meet consumers' demand, including for tailored cross-border services; calls for better exploitation of digital technologies which should constitute a springboard for both differentiation and multiplication of legitimate offers;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses the importance of promoting digital skills and media literacy for all EU citizens including those with disabilities such as those who are hard of hearing, as it plays an essential role for societal participation and democratic citizenship; recalls the important role of public service media plays in this regard as part of their public service;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to present a legislative initiative for the collective management of copyright, aimed at ensuring better accountability, transparency and governance on the part of collective rights management societies, as well as efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, and at clarifying and simplifying licensing systems in the music sector; stresses, in this regard, the need to operate a clear distinction between licensing practices for different types of content, notably between audiovisual/cinematographic and musical works; recalls that the licensing of audiovisual works is
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to present a legislative initiative for the collective management of copyright, aimed at ensuring better accountability, transparency and governance on the part of collective rights management societies, as well as efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, and at clarifying and simplifying licensing systems in the music sector; stresses, in this regard, the need to operate a clear distinction between licensing practices for different types of content, notably between audiovisual/cinematographic and musical works; recalls that the licensing of audiovisual works is mainly conducted on the basis of contractual agreements, and that collective management is rare;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Emphasises that collective rights management is an essential tool for broadcasters, given the high number of rights they need to clear daily; stresses that, where for some types of content and use (e.g. mass-use of music by broadcasters) collective licensing already takes place, an efficient framework guaranteeing one-stop shop should be ensured to help stimulate the EU-wide availability of audiovisual services of which music is an integrated part; recalls that such a framework has been repeatedly demanded by the European Parliament and has already proven useful for transfrontier traditional audiovisual services (e.g. for cable and satellite services);
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Takes the view that new technologies could be used in order to facilitate the clearing of rights; welcomes in this respect the ISAN standard initiative which makes the identification of audiovisual works and of the right holders easier; calls on the Commission to consider the opportunity of implementing the ISAN throughout the EU;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Recalls that the commercial exploitation of the exclusive rights of communication to the public and of making available to the public aims at generating financial resources, in case of commercial success, in order to finance the future production and distribution of projects, thus promoting the availability of a diversified and permanent offer of new films;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Recalls that, where relevant, collective rights management solutions (such as extended collective licensing where appropriate) should be found for making broadcasters' archives available to the public on the Internet throughout Europe; considers that this would ultimately benefit all citizens interested in viewing or listening to a vast part of Europe's cultural heritage;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the application of the current acquis in the field of copyright and take into account the implications of the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the EU in the Premier League case on EU-wide access to audiovisual services;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Points out that the development of cloud computing services for copyright protected content can bring new challenges, such as the distinction between legal and illegal copies of a music track that consumers may upload; stresses that the content should be available only to the consumer who has legally purchased it and that individual access codes are an efficient solution in this respect;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need to find
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need to find a solution allowing
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Supports, as far as authors are concerned, European legislation which would provide audiovisual authors with an unwaivable right to remuneration for online uses of their works when they have transferred their making available right to a producer; considers that such a remuneration right should be entrusted to collective management societies representing audiovisual authors, unless unions' contracts or extended collective licences already guarantee such remuneration; also considers that the remuneration should be collected from audiovisual media services making audiovisual works available to the public;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that it is essential, in the online distribution of audiovisual works, to guarantee equitable remuneration for all authors, artists and performers involved, for example by setting up collective agreements through contractual clauses or, in the absence of an agreement between the parties, through voluntary collective administration;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses that problems associated with online payment systems, such as lack of interoperability and high costs of micro- payment for consumers, should be tackled with a view to developing simple, innovative and cost-effective solutions of benefit to consumers and digital platforms;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls for the Commission to urgently carry out a study on the different remuneration options for authors, artists and performers in the audiovisual sector, so that best practice in Member States can be used to set up an EU model;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the need to ensure flexibility and interoperability in the distribution of audiovisual works by digital platforms, so as to provide legal forms of supply in response to market demand while ensuring respect for copyright and consumer rights;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Stresses the importance of promoting digital skills and media literacy for all EU citizens as it plays an essential role for societal participation and democratic citizenship; recalls the important role of public service media plays in this regard as part of their public service missions;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Stresses the importance of net neutrality in order to guarantee equal access to high speed networks, which is crucial for the quality of legitimate online audiovisual services;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the Commission to find mechanisms to encourage access to archived audiovisual material held in Europe's film heritage institutions; for reasons often linked to diminishing consumer appeal and limited shelf life, a substantial share of European audiovisual material is unavailable commercially;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Considers that, in a context of technological convergence, rights licensing arrangements should apply a technologically-neutral approach; recalls that today, the same TV set can offer both on demand Internet-based services such as catch-up services and traditional broadcast of the same programme; considers therefore that the licensing scheme for the simultaneous, unchanged and unabridged retransmission of audiovisual broadcasting content originating in a Member State over any platform should follow the same regime as is applied to cable retransmission, irrespective of the platform and the transmission method used;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Calls on Member States and the Commission to promote solutions to support the digitization, preservation and educational availability of these works, including across borders;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Calls on the Commission, with regard to the impact of standardized practices on the free movement and free provision of audiovisual works, to implement measures facilitating wider use of the ISAN system;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the need to ensure flexibility in the distribution of audiovisual works by digital platforms, so as to provide legal forms of supply in response to market demand and to foster cross-border access to content originating from other Member States while ensuring respect for copyright;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the need to ensure flexibility in the distribution of audiovisual works by digital platforms, so as to
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Highlights the need for European and national education campaigns to raise awareness on the importance of intellectual property rights, as well as on the available legal channels through which audiovisual works are distributed online; points out that consumers should be properly informed about any IPR- related questions that may arise when using file-sharing under cloud computing services;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Invites the Commission to enable the industry to test innovative means of distribution seeking to exploit the possible benefits across and between territories and exploitation windows notably through the implementation of the preparatory action on circulation of audiovisual works adopted by Parliament in November 2011;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Points out that the European copyright "acquis communautaire" does not per se preclude voluntary multi- territorial or pan-European licensing mechanisms but that cultural and language differences between Member States, as well as variations in national rules unrelated to intellectual property, necessitate a flexible and complementary approach at European level in order to advance towards the digital single market;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that territorial distribution schemes should
source: PE-486.139
2012/04/13
CULT
165 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) - having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 21, whereby the cultural and creative sectors make a significant contribution in the fight against every form of discrimination, including racism and xenophobia,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas copyright is a vital legal instrument which grants rights-holders certain exclusive rights and protects these rights, allowing the cultural and creative industries to grow and prosper financially while also helping to safeguard jobs;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses that simplified clearance and aggregation, especially of online music rights, would promote the internal market and urges the European Commission to take this into consideration as appropriate in the legal act on collective rights management that has been announced;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Points out that the continuing convergence of the media, not only in terms of authors’ rights, but also in terms of entertainment law, requires new problem-solving approaches; urges the European Commission to check to what extent various regulations for linear and non-linear services in Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services are still up-to-date, taking the latest technological developments into consideration;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. Believes that restrictions on advertising for linear children’s ranges, on news and information programmes, are reasonable despite the increasingly obsolete distinction between linear and non-linear selections; suggests, however, that consideration be given to new forms of cross-programme and cross-platform clearing systems, with the aid of which interest could be awoken in high-quality content, which would also increase the linear programme quality and the online variety without burdening the revenue of private broadcasters;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States to continue to promote respect for authors’ rights
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States to promote respect for authors’ rights and combat the provision and distribution of unauthorised content, including via streaming;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States to promote respect for authors' and neighbouring rights and combat the provision of unauthorised content, including via streaming;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States to promote respect for authors' and neighbouring rights and to combat the provision of unauthorised content, including via streaming;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to afford Internet users legal certainty when using streamed services and to consider, in particular, ways to prevent the use of payment systems and funding through advertising on pay platforms offering unauthorised downloading and streaming services;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Draws attention to the upsurge of social networking platforms offering Internet users the chance to financially support the production of a film or documentary, which makes them feel like an integral part of its making, but stresses, nonetheless, that this type of funding in the short term is unlikely to replace traditional sources of funding;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas changes to the legal framework that would facilitate
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls for
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls for Internet users to be afforded greater legal certainty when using streamed
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls for Internet users to be afforded greater legal certainty when using streamed
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls for Internet users to be afforded greater legal certainty when using streamed services, but suggests that consideration should be given to how to block access to pay platforms offering unauthorised services through greater harmonisation of laws;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls for Internet users to be afforded greater legal certainty when using streamed services, but suggests that consideration should be given to
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls for Internet users to be afforded greater legal certainty when using streamed services, but suggests that consideration should be given to how to block access to
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls for Internet users to be afforded greater legal certainty when using streamed services, but suggests that consideration should be given to how to
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls for Internet users to be afforded greater legal certainty when using streamed services, but suggests that consideration should be given to how to block access to pay platforms offering unauthorised services; underlines that decisions to block sites should solely be undertaken after a court judgement has approved such a decision;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Encourages stakeholders to work together in sharing information and embracing new technological tools in order to protect their rights;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Suggests, however, that measures be taken to remove from pay platforms any content that the provider, who intends to make a profit from the content offered, is not authorised to use;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas changes to the legal framework that would facilitate the acquisition and cross border-licensing of rights would encourage the free movement of works in the EU and help to strengthen the European audiovisual industry;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Takes the view that the introduction of tracking and tracing systems within electronic information and communication networks for the purpose of detecting breaches of author’s rights and related intellectual property rights would constitute a disproportionate infringement of the fundamental freedom of communication of EU citizens and therefore rejects it;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that permanent and unique identification of works in accordance with
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that permanent and unique identification of works in accordance with
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) (after subheading "Remuneration") 8a. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the application of the current acquis in the field of copyright; and in the context of the development of the digital single market, to particularly focus on the implementation of the communication and the making available of the rights of authors, recognised by Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EU on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Maintains that it is essential to guarantee authors remuneration that is fair and proportional to
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Maintains that it is essential to guarantee authors remuneration that is fair
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Maintains that it is essential to guarantee authors remuneration that is fair and proportional to the revenue generated by
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Maintains that it is essential to guarantee authors and rights holders remuneration that is fair and proportional to the revenue generated by the online exploitation and distribution of their works;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Maintains that it is essential to guarantee authors and performers remuneration that is fair and proportional to the revenue generated by the online exploitation of their works;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 а (new) 9а. Calls for measures to be taken to guarantee fair remuneration for rights holders when distributing, retransmitting or rebroadcasting audiovisual works;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas changes to the legal framework that would facilitate the acquisition of rights would encourage the free movement of works in the EU and help to strengthen the European audiovisual industry
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for a rebalancing of the bargaining position between authors and producers by providing authors with an unwaivable right to remuneration for all forms of exploitation of their works, including ongoing remuneration when authors have transferred their exclusive 'making available' right to a producer;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for the development of new solutions on user-friendly payment systems such as micropayments, and for the development of systems enabling the direct payment of creators, benefiting both consumers and authors;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Points out that the administration of audiovisual rights for the commercial exploitation of works in the digital age could be made easier if Member States were to introduce effective, transparent and legally certain rights management procedures
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Points out that the administration of audiovisual rights for the commercial exploitation of works in the digital age could be made easier if Member States were to
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls upon the Commission to speed up the work on the proposal for a Directive on Collective Rights Management, that should also take into account the specificities of the audiovisual sector;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Maintains that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Maintains that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights holders is t
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas a uniform standard for durable, unambiguous identification of audiovisual works, which, however, would not necessitate or bring about any ‘Deep Packet Inspection’ or other forms of online monitoring, would make the traceability and licensing of such works easier for the IDA database (database of the International Documentation on Audiovisual works) and the International Performer Database and thereby improve the sale and administration of rights, especially in Europe;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Maintains that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights holders is to implement
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Maintains that the best means of guaranteeing
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Observes that it would be useful for culture workers and Member States to negotiate the implementation of measures enabling public records to fully benefit from digital technology for works that form part of heritage, especially as regards access to remote digital works on non-commercial scales;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Stresses that if voluntary collective management were to no longer permit the broadcasting of the world music repertoire and if equivalent measures for obtaining rights could no longer be voluntarily introduced with legal certainty, mandatory collective management for authorising the use of music and musical compositions should expressly be considered as a part of programmes distributed by EU media services;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on Member States to ensure
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on Member States to ensure that collective management companies use
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on Member States to ensure that collective management companies use effective, functional and mutually compatible tools;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission to consider ways to encourage network operators to standardise their technical tools and reverse the current trend of removing responsibility from these operators regarding consumer protection, implementation of intellectual property and ensuring Internet privacy;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses the importance of initiating a debate on the issue of the divergent VAT rates applied in Member States and calls on the Commission and the Member States to coordinate their actions in the sector in question;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the European Union should encourage the development of new audiovisual business models, for which purpose improvements need to be made to current regulations in order to limit/reduce/prevent illegal trafficking of audiovisual works on the Internet;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that consideration should be given to applying a reduced rate of VAT to the digital distribution of cultural goods and services in order to eliminate the inequalities between online and offline services; stresses, at the same time, that this decision should be made by individual countries on their own;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission to implement a legal framework for online non-EU audiovisual services if they are aimed directly or indirectly at the EU public so that they are subject to the same obligations as EU services;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Notes that in order to ensure fair competition among the different operators or the different platforms, the provisions on cable in the ‘cable and satellite’ directive should be extended to the integrated, simultaneous and unabridged retransmission of pre-existing broadcasts via closed retransmission platforms such as IPTV services;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Encourages the Commission to adapt copyright to the new digital era, and to consider specific ways of facilitating the re-use of archive content and putting in place extended collective licensing systems and easy, one-stop shop systems for the clearance of rights;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Reminds Member States of their obligations as outlined in Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/13/EU (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) and calls upon the Commission to provide a detailed report on the current status of implementation as per Article 13(3) to the European Parliament without delay;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Calls on the Commission, with the cooperation of Parliament, to call for an annual assembly dedicated to developing online audiovisual and cinematographic content in which new models for the creation and promotion of online audiovisual content will be examined;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) 15c. Stresses that the development of smart terminals has further facilitated direct access to audiovisual content via search engines, and that it would therefore be appropriate to ensure that the links given the highest ranking by referral sites will direct consumers to domestic and European sites or services, in order to ensure the economic value of content;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 d (new) 15d. Encourages Member States to implement Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services and recommends that they monitor how European works, particularly films and documentaries, are actually presented and promoted throughout the different audiovisual media services accessible to the public, and stresses the need for closer cooperation between regulatory authorities and film funding organisations;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Reaffirms the crucial role of integrating new technologies in national educational programmes and the particular importance of educating all European citizens to become media and digitally literate from a very early age in order to develop their skills in these areas;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Reaffirms the importance of educating all European citizens of all ages to become media and digitally literate
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas piracy hinders investment in the cultural sector and slows down the future development of our audiovisual services;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses the importance of promoting media literacy also for elderly citizens in Europe and to reduce the digital gap in the society, as this plays an essential role for societal participation and democratic citizenship; recalls the important role played by public service media in this regard as part of their public service missions;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Draws attention to the need to more strongly communicate the importance of copyright protection and the related fair remuneration to the public;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Emphasises the need to take into account the granting of a special status to institutions with an educational purpose regarding online access to audiovisual works;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Points out that it is of essential importance to pursue an ambitious MEDIA
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Points out that the MEDIA programme has established itself as an independent brand and that it is of essential importance to pursue an ambitious MEDIA programme for 2014–2020 that is in the same spirit as the current programme;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that it is vital
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas European broadcasters p
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas European broadcasting companie
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas cinema exhibition continues to account for a large proportion of film revenue and has a considerable impact on the success of films on video-on-demand platforms;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 8, whereby the protection of personal data must be guaranteed,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the Audiovisual Media Services Directive Article 13(1) provides the basis for introducing funding and promotion obligations for on-demand audiovisual media services as they too play a crucial role in the promotion and protection of cultural diversity;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the guideline on audiovisual media services in Article 13(1) forms the basis for the obligations arising from introduction, financing and promotion for audiovisual on-demand services, it should also play a significant role in the promotion and protection of cultural diversity;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas European broadcasters operating in a digital, convergent, multimedia platform environment need flexible, future-oriented copyright clearance systems that make effective copyright clearance possible even in a one-stop shop. Flexible copyright classification systems of this kind have been in place in the Nordic countries for decades;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas it is essential to ensure the development of attractive and diverse legal online content and to
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas it is essential to ensure the development of attractive and diverse legal online content
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas it is essential to ensure the development of attractive and diverse legal o
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the online distribution of audiovisual products is an excellent opportunity to enhance knowledge of European languages and whereas this objective can be achieved through original versions and the possibility to include translation of the audiovisual products into a great variety of languages;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas it is essential to
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the digital age, by nature, offers great opportunities for creating and
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas it is essential to ensure legal certainty and with regard to authorisations for users to give access to the works with regard to authors' rights in the European digital area;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas it is essential to ensure legal certainty with regard to authors’ rights in the European digital area through greater harmonisation of laws;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas it is essential to ensure legal certainty with regard to authors' and neighbouring rights in the European digital area;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas it is essential to ensure legal certainty with regard to authors’ rights in the European digital area, both for right holders and for potential consumers of the works;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas the rapid development of social networking platforms is a driver of freedom of artistic and creative expression for Internet users, the consequences for uploading works protected by copyright should not, however, be forgotten;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Η a (new) Ηa. whereas strengthening of the legal framework for the audiovisual sector in Europe contributes to further protection of freedom of expression and thought, reinforcing the democratic values and principles of the EU;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas it is essential that braodcasters and other content providers continue to have one-stop shop access to the global repertoire for music through a blanket license from a single collecting society for linear and on-demand service;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Н а (new) Нa. acknowledging the key role of the producer in the creation of audiovisual works in the European Union;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas specific action needs to be taken to preserve the
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas specific action needs to be taken to preserve the European cinematographic and audiovisual heritage, particularly by encouraging the digitisation of content;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the digital age offers great opportunities for creating and disseminating works for artists in the broad sense, but also presents enormous challenges for exploiters of author's rights who rely on analogue business models;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas specific action needs to be taken to preserve the European cinematographic and audiovisual heritage, particularly by encouraging the digitisation of content, and making it easier for citizens and users to access Europe's film and audiovisual heritage;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas specific action needs to be taken to preserve the European cinematographic and audiovisual heritage, particularly by encouraging the digitisation of content;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the introduction of a system for identifying and labelling works would contribute to protect rights holders and restrict unauthorised use;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas it is absolutely essential to preserve
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas it is absolutely essential to preserve the principle of net neutrality in
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas it is absolutely essential to preserve the principle of net neutrality in order to ensure the availability of audiovisual services as well as to take into account technological convergence;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas it is absolutely essential to preserve the principle of net neutrality in order to ensure the availability of audiovisual services, and promoting freedom of expression and media pluralism in the European Union;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas it is absolutely essential to preserve the principle of net neutrality and freedom in order to ensure the availability of audiovisual services;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas there can be no sustainable creation
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the digital age offers great opportunities for creating and disseminating works but also presents enormous challenges; and whereas one of those is to secure the greatest freedom possible to network users as well as to producers of audiovisual works;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas there can be no sustainable creation or cultural diversity in the absence of authors’ rights that protect and reward creators, also within the framework of legally flawless access to the cultural heritage for users;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. also whereas a large number of violations of authors’ rights or related intellectual property rights are based on understandable need of a potential audience for new audiovisual content under simple and fairly priced conditions and this demand has not yet been sufficiently fulfilled;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas platforms offering illegal content can drive down license fees as distributors struggle to compete with 'free' sources;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas fairness demands that
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas the
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas the effectiveness of collective rights management
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas the effectiveness of collective management companies and collecting societies needs to be improved by introducing measures aimed at increasing their transparency and good governance by ensuring competition between collective rights management companies and collecting societies across borders, to facilitate the completion of Europe's Digital Single Market;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas collective rights management is an essential tool for broadcasters given the high number of rights they need to clear daily and should therefore provide for efficient licensing schemes for the online use of audiovisual content in the broadcasters' archives;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas it is necessary that collective rights management move towards a European model of licenses which, as it covers several territories, gives holders a high level of protection and, in turn, allows the development of the Single Digital Market;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas market progress in many ways has created the necessary growth and cultural content in line with the objectives of the single market;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas more efficient rights clearance of European audiovisual works through a harmonised one-stop shop or better and transparent service of collective rights management companies and collecting societies would lead to increased supply of these works, thereby increasing revenue for rights holders;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O b (new) Ob. whereas it is urgent that the Commission proposes a directive on the transparency and good governance of collective rights' management in order to improve the trust in, and recourse to, this management tool in the digital age;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas the principle of media chronology allows an overall balance in the audiovisual sector, ensuring efficient pre- financing of
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q a (new) Qa. whereas media chronology is governed by interprofessional agreements and, in some cases, is at the discretion of the Member States;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q a (new) Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R a (new) Ra. whereas the current regulatory framework is not enough to guarantee an effective collective licensing system for non-linear media services as regards the broadcasting of music;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R a (new) Ra. having regard to the fact that the growth of the Internet continually creates new ways of online music piece distribution;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R a (new) Ra. whereas the legislative and fiscal framework should be friendly with the enterprises that promote online distribution of audiovisual products with an economic value;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S S. whereas access to the media for people with disabilities is of major importance; with programmes also adapted to people with handicaps;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas there is more consumer- content available today than ever before;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S S. whereas access to the media for people with disabilities is of major importance and should be facilitated;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S a (new) Sa. whereas there is a crucial need to step up research and development for developing techniques for the automated management of services for people with disabilities, especially thanks to hybrid broadcasting;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 Legal content
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need to make legal content more attractive and improve the availability of subtitled works as well as in all the official languages of the EU;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need to make legal content more attractive and improve the online availability of audiovisual works, in particular subtitled works;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the need to make legal content
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that this requires flexible, future-oriented rights management systems that are based on models for collective licences, mutual recognition contracts and the mutual forfeiture of royalties by right holders in order to allow for effective rights management for the mass usage of rights for multi-platform use;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that multi-territorial or pan-European licensing mechanisms should remain voluntary and that linguistic and cultural differences between Member States, alongside variations in national rules unrelated to copyright law, carry their own specific challenges; believes therefore, that a flexible approach regarding pan- European licensing is needed to overcome bureaucratic barriers and enhance access while protecting right holders and progressing towards the digital single market;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines the importance of offering content with subtitles in as many languages as possible, especially with regards to video on demand services;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Advocates a market driven approach that allows rights holders the contractual freedom to choose the terms of the distribution of their work, the distribution channel and the territorial scope of the rights licensed as this contractual freedom will allow them to tailor their distribution to their audience and to maximise revenue;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas it is essential to make the European audiovisual sector more competitive by supporting online services while also promoting linguistic and cultural diversity and media pluralism;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses th
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that consideration should be given to introducing innovative alternative micro-payment systems, such as payment by text message
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Promotes the development of a rich and diverse legal offering, especially by making release windows more flexible;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that release windows should be made more flexible
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that release windows should be made more flexible for works that are made available exclusively online; and that rights holders should be able to decide freely when they want to launch the products on different platforms;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that release windows should be made more flexible for works that are made available
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to implement the preparatory action adopted by Parliament for testing new modes of distribution based on the complementarity between platforms on the flexibility of release windows;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on all Member States to urgently implement Article 13 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive in a prescriptive manner and introduce funding and promotion obligations for on-demand audiovisual media services;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that, for the creation of a single internal digital market in Europe, it is essential to establish pan-European regulations on the collective management of authors’ rights and related intellectual property rights so as to put a stop to the continuing various amendments to legislation in the Member States that make cross-border rights management increasingly difficult;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Β B. whereas it is essential to make the European audiovisual sector more competitive by supporting online services while also promoting European civilisation, cultural diversity and media pluralism;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need to
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need to create legal certainty and bring legislation into line with the realities of the digital age
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Observes that the development of cross-border service providers is entirely possible so long as business platforms are prepared to contractually acquire the rights to exploit one or more territories, because it is important to remember that territorial systems are the normal markets in broadcasting;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that identification and marking systems should only be introduced under the condition that these do not require ‘deep packet inspection’ or other forms of online supervision;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Reaffirms the objective for an intensified and efficient cross-border online distribution of audiovisual works between the Member States;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Supports a European framework that would allow a simplification of a rights clearance system, i.e. a one-stop shop for the licensing of background music and cut material incorporated in audiovisual works for online distribution, in order to prevent further fragmentation of the music rights, namely the reproduction right and the making available right;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Urges the European Commission to provide the legal act it announced on collective rights management without delay; this act should include regulations on statutory permission for collecting societies, minimum requirements for the granting of licences, ensuring transparency in charges and mutual recognition contracts, the admissibility of licensing agreements, compulsory administration, the prohibition of discrimination, the organisational structure, minimum standards in regulatory law, general principles in determining charges and quality control for collecting societies and should guarantee independent, efficient dispute resolution;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that for the purpose of commercial exploitation, rights are transferred to the audiovisual producer who relies on the centralisation of exclusive rights granted under copyright law to organise the financing, production and distribution of audiovisual works;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for a framework that promotes legal certainty through the related amendments to Directive 2004/48/EC, designed for the analog domain and which does not address effective solutions for the digital market;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Supports the establishment of consistent European rules on good governance and transparency of collecting societies as well as efficient dispute resolution mechanisms;
source: PE-487.679
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=21922&j=0&l=en
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.505New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-480505_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE487.679New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-487679_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.423&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-478423_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE485.840&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-485840_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-262&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0262_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-324New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0324_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CULT/7/08155New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/committees/1/date |
Old
New
2012-02-08T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/1 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
Old
New
2012-02-08T00:00:00 |
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/1 |
|
committees/1/date |
Old
New
2012-02-08T00:00:00 |
committees/1/rapporteur/1 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|