BETA

Activities of Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA

Plenary speeches (330)

Coordination of social security systems (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0397(COD)
Transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0355(COD)
European Labour Authority (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0064(COD)
Pan-European Personal Pension Product (A8-0278/2018 - Sophia in 't Veld) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0121(COD)
Major interpellations (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector - Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs - Adapting to development in the road transport sector (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0123(COD)
Common rules for the internal market for electricity (A8-0044/2018 - Jerzy Buzek) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0380(COD)
Report on financial crimes, tax evasion and tax avoidance (A8-0170/2019 - Jeppe Kofod, Luděk Niedermayer) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2121(INI)
EU-Afghanistan Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development (resolution) (A8-0058/2019 - Anna Elżbieta Fotyga) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0302M(NLE)
Debate with the Prime Minister of Finland, Mr Juha Sipilä, on the Future of Europe (debate) PL
2016/11/22
State of the US-EU trade negotiations (debate) PL
2016/11/22
The UK’s withdrawal from the EU (debate) PL
2016/11/22
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0202(COD)
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0206(COD)
Involving workers and citizens in a just transition for a safer planet (topical debate) PL
2016/11/22
Education in the digital era: challenges, opportunities and lessons for EU policy design (A8-0400/2018 - Yana Toom) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2090(INI)
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0273/2017 - Anne Sander) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0257(COD)
Minimum standards for minorities in the EU (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2036(INI)
Minimum income for a fair Europe: a right for citizens (topical debate) PL
2016/11/22
The future of pensions: fighting privatisation and strengthening public universal social security systems (topical debate) PL
2016/11/22
State of EU-China relations (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2274(INI)
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (A8-0206/2018 - Merja Kyllönen) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0121(COD)
Role of cities in the institutional framework of the Union (A8-0203/2018 - Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2037(INI)
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector - Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs - Adapting to development in the road transport sector (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0123(COD)
The definition of SMEs (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2545(RSP)
Proportionality test before adoption of new regulation of professions (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0404(COD)
Modernisation of education in the EU (A8-0173/2018 - Krystyna Łybacka) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2224(INI)
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (A8-0175/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes) (vote) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2029(BUD)
The impact of delocalisation on workers and regions (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Implementation of the EU Youth Strategy (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2259(INI)
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0070(COD)
Sustainable finance (A8-0164/2018 - Molly Scott Cato) (vote) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/2007(INI)
Strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2279(INI)
Corporate social responsibility (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Corporate social responsibility (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Europass: framework for skills and qualifications (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0304(COD)
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (B8-0068/2018) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2936(RSP)
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (B8-0068/2018) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2936(RSP)
The consequences of rising socio-economic inequalities for European citizens (topical debate) PL
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive and the need for reform in professional services (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2073(INI)
Implementation of the Youth Employment Initiative in the Member States (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2039(INI)
Implementation of EU macro-regional strategies (A8-0389/2017 - Andrea Cozzolino) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2040(INI)
State of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom (B8-0676/2017, B8-0677/2017) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2964(RSP)
Implementation of the Social Pillar (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Combating inequalities as a lever to boost job creation and growth (A8-0340/2017 - Javi López) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2269(INI)
The situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2931(RSP)
Recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation (A8-0338/2016 - Gesine Meissner) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0050(COD)
Deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change (A8-0329/2017 - Iratxe García Pérez) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2245(INI)
Protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0130(COD)
Control of spending and monitoring of EU Youth Guarantee schemes cost-effectiveness (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2242(INI)
A European action plan for the social economy (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2877(RSP)
State of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom (B8-0538/2017, B8-0539/2017) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2847(RSP)
Women’s economic empowerment in the private and public sectors in the EU (A8-0271/2017 - Anna Hedh) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2008(INI)
A new skills agenda for Europe (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2002(INI)
Working conditions and precarious employment (A8-0224/2017 - Neoklis Sylikiotis) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2221(INI)
Implementation of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2064(INI)
Decision adopted on Mobility package (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Road transport in the European Union (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2545(RSP)
Decision adopted on the European Pillar of Social Rights and work-life balance initiative (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union (RC-B8-0237/2017, B8-0237/2017, B8-0241/2017, B8-0242/2017, B8-0243/2017) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2593(RSP)
Women and their roles in rural areas (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2204(INI)
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (A8-0003/2017) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0148(COD)
European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2017 (A8-0037/2017 - Yana Toom) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2307(INI)
Investing in jobs and growth - maximising the contribution of European Structural and Investment Funds - Delayed implementation of ESI Funds operational programmes - impact on cohesion policy and the way forward (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2148(INI)
Annual report on EU competition policy (A8-0001/2017 - Tibor Szanyi) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2100(INI)
A European Pillar of Social Rights (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2095(INI)
Programme of activities of the Maltese Presidency (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Labour market reforms and labour relations in Greece (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland (debate) PL
2016/11/22
A coherent EU policy for cultural and creative industries (A8-0357/2016 - Christian Ehler, Luigi Morgano) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2072(INI)
Recent transition of the IANA stewardship to the global internet community in October 2016 and the upcoming Internet Governance Forum in Mexico (6-8 December 2016) (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Situation in Syria (B8-1123/2016, RC-B8-1249/2016, B8-1249/2016, B8-1250/2016, B8-1251/2016, B8-1252/2016, B8-1253/2016, B8-1254/2016, B8-1255/2016) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2933(RSP)
Towards a definitive VAT system and fighting VAT fraud (A8-0307/2016 - Werner Langen) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2033(INI)
New opportunities for small transport businesses (A8-0304/2016 - Dominique Riquet) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2349(INI)
Establishing a Skills Guarantee (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2799(RSP)
European Voluntary Service (B8-1126/2016, B8-1126/2016, B8-1127/2016, B8-1128/2016, B8-1133/2016, B8-1134/2016, B8-1135/2016) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2872(RSP)
EU Youth Strategy 2013-2015 (A8-0250/2016 - Andrea Bocskor) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2351(INI)
2014 Annual report on monitoring the application of Union law (A8-0262/2016 - Heidi Hautala) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2326(INI)
Sustainable finance (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Women’s rights in Poland (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Minimum income schemes in the EU (debate) PL
2016/11/22
How best to harness the job creation potential of SMEs? (A8-0248/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2320(INI)
Application of the Employment Equality Directive (A8-0225/2016 - Renate Weber) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2116(INI)
Activities, impact and added value of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund between 2007 and 2014 (A8-0227/2016 - Marian Harkin) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2284(INI)
Activities, impact and added value of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund between 2007 and 2014 (A8-0227/2016 - Marian Harkin) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2284(INI)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2010(INI)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2010(INI)
Social dumping in the EU (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Social dumping in the EU (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Creating labour market conditions favourable for work-life balance (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2017(INI)
Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2258(INI)
Application of minimum wage law in the transport sector (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Application of minimum wage law in the transport sector (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Forwarding of texts adopted during the sitting PL
2016/11/22
Refugees: social inclusion and integration into the labour market (A8-0204/2016 - Brando Benifei) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2321(INI)
Promoting free movement by simplifying the acceptance of certain public documents (A8-0156/2016 - Mady Delvaux) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0119(COD)
Non-tariff barriers in the Single Market (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2346(INI)
Framework Agreement on parental leave (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0157/2016 - Dariusz Rosati) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/0010(CNS)
Tackling inequalities in order to boost inclusive and sustainable economic growth in the EU (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Women domestic workers and carers in the EU (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2094(INI)
Use of Passenger Name Record data (EU PNR) (A8-0248/2015 - Timothy Kirkhope) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0023(COD)
Posting of workers (debate) PL
2016/11/22
What is a 'social triple-A' rating? (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/3024(RSP)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance PL
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2016 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016 - Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2256(INI)
European network of Employment Services, workers' access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0002(COD)
2015 progress report on Serbia (B8-0166/2016) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2892(RSP)
European integration process of Kosovo (B8-0167/2016) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2893(RSP)
Railways and public services in the Danube and Adriatic macro-regions (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Establishment of a European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of undeclared work (A8-0172/2015 - Georgi Pirinski) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0124(COD)
External factors that represent hurdles to European female entrepreneurship (A8-0369/2015 - Barbara Matera) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2111(INI)
Skills policies for fighting youth unemployment (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2088(INI)
Gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2967(RSP)
Sustainable urban mobility (A8-0319/2015 - Karima Delli) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2242(INI)
EU Strategic framework on health and safety at work 2014-2020 (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2107(INI)
Preventive measures to tackle the gender pension gap in the EU (debate) PL
2016/11/22
European Semester package - Annual Growth Survey 2016 (debate) PL
2016/11/22
EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region (A8-0279/2015 - Ivan Jakovčić) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2214(INI)
Cohesion policy and review of the Europe 2020 strategy (A8-0277/2015 - Fernando Ruas) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2246(INI)
Council Recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2820(RSP)
Conclusions of the informal European Council of 23 September 2015 (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council on migration (14 September 2015) (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Decision adopted on 15 July 2015 on the energy summer package (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combating unemployment - Creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century - Precarious employment (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2235(INI)
Family businesses in Europe (A8-0223/2015 - Angelika Niebler) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2210(INI)
Urban dimension of EU policies - Investment for jobs and growth: promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2245(INI)
Assessment of the 2012 European Year for active ageing and solidarity between generations (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2255(INI)
Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights (A8-0209/2015 - Julia Reda) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2256(INI)
Green employment initiative - Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2238(INI)
European Fund for Strategic Investments (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0009(COD)
Decision adopted on the action plan for a fairer corporate tax system in the EU (debate) PL
2016/11/22
European energy security strategy (A8-0164/2015 - Algirdas Saudargas) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2153(INI)
State of EU-Russia relations (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2001(INI)
European Investment Bank annual report 2013 (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2156(INI)
Pre-financing of operational programmes supported by the Youth Employment Initiative (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/0026(COD)
European film in the digital era (A8-0123/2015 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2148(INI)
Implementation of the Bologna process (short presentation) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2039(INI)
Employment quotas for people with disabilities in the EU institutions (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Annual Tax report - Decision adopted on the Tax Transparency policy (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2144(INI)
Employment conditions including minimum rates of pay applicable to the transport sector - Compliance of the German provisions with European law on the minimum wage in the transport sector (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Fight against child sexual abuse on the Internet (RC-B8-0217/2015, B8-0217/2015, B8-0218/2015, B8-0219/2015, B8-0220/2015, B8-0226/2015, B8-0227/2015) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2564(RSP)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2015 (A8-0043/2015 - Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2222(INI)
European long-term investment funds (continuation of debate) PL
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund - application EGF/2013/009 PL/Zachem (A8-0036/2015 - Jan Olbrycht) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2016(BUD)
Annual report on EU competition policy (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2158(INI)
Decision adopted on a Strategic framework for the Energy Union (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Initiatives in the framework of the International Labour Organization debate on the right to strike (debate) PL
2016/11/22
European Youth Initiative (modification of the ESF regulation) (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Promotion of employee financial participation (debate) PL
2016/11/22
European fund for strategic investments (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Ombudsman's annual report 2013 (A8-0058/2014 - Jarosław Wałęsa) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2159(INI)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (18 December 2014) (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Economic governance review of the 6-pack and 2-pack regulations (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2013/006 PL/Fiat Auto Poland S.A. (A8-0062/2014 - Jan Olbrycht) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2181(BUD)
Assessment of good repute of transport operators (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank (A8-0027/2014 - Roberto Gualtieri) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/0808(CNS)
Employment and social aspects of the EU2020 strategy (debate) PL
2016/11/22
EU Strategic framework on health and safety at work 2014-2020 (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2861(RSP)
Amendments to agreements with EEA countries and Switzerland (debate) PL
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2014 priorities (A8-0019/2014 - Philippe De Backer) PL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2059(INI)
Outcome of the high level conference on employment in Europe (Milan, 8 October) (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Better prevention and management of floods at European level (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Roll-out of the European Youth Initiative (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Structural shortage of payments in the Horizon 2020 budget (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Youth employment (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Withdrawal of the maternity leave directive (debate) PL
2016/11/22
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance PL
2016/11/22
Review of the Greek Presidency (debate) PL
2016/11/22
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (A7-0249/2013 - Danuta Jazłowiecka) (vote)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0061(COD)
Hospitable environment for enterprises, businesses and start-ups to create jobs (A7-0101/2014 - Anthea McIntyre)
2016/11/22
Consumer product safety - Market surveillance of products - Protection of consumers in utilities services (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0048(COD)
Enhancing worker mobility by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/0214(COD)
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0061(COD)
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0061(COD)
Enhanced cooperation between Public employment services (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0202(COD)
Effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers (Court of Auditors Special Report 25/2012) (A7-0151/2014 - Zigmantas Balčytis)
2016/11/22
Interchange fees for card-based payment transactions (A7-0167/2014 - Pablo Zalba Bidegain)
2016/11/22
European single market for electronic communications - Measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks - Electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0146(COD)
European business centres in Asia (debate)
2016/11/22
Employment and social aspects of the role and operations of the Troika (A7-0135/2014 - Alejandro Cercas)
2016/11/22
2013 progress report on Turkey (B7-0241/2014)
2016/11/22
Freedom of movement for workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0124(COD)
SOLVIT (A7-0059/2014 - Morten Løkkegaard)
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Youth Guarantee (debate)
2016/11/22
Accessibility of public sector bodies' websites (A7-0460/2013 - Jorgo Chatzimarkakis)
2016/11/22
European Semester for economic policy coordination: annual growth survey 2014 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects - Single market governance (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2194(INI)
Criminal sanctions for insider dealing and market manipulation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0297(COD)
Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (A7-0319/2013 - Sari Essayah)
2016/11/22
Integrated parcel delivery market for the growth of e-commerce (A7-0024/2014 - Pablo Arias Echeverría)
2016/11/22
EU homelessness strategy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2994(RSP)
Review of the Lithuanian Presidency (debate)
2016/11/22
Effective labour inspections as a strategy to improve working conditions (A7-0458/2013 - Jutta Steinruck)
2016/11/22
Financial participation of employees in companies' proceeds (A7-0465/2013 - Phil Bennion)
2016/11/22
Social protection for all, including self-employed workers (A7-0459/2013 - Vilija Blinkevičiūtė)
2016/11/22
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund 2014-2020 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0269(COD)
ILO Convention concerning decent work for domestic workers (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/0085(NLE)
Annual report on EU competition policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2075(INI)
Programme for social change and innovation (A7-0241/2012 - Jutta Steinruck)
2016/11/22
Strengthening the social dimension of EMU (B7-0496/2013)
2016/11/22
Horizon 2020 - framework programme for research and innovation (2014-2020) - Rules for the participation and dissemination in Horizon 2020 - Specific programme implementing Horizon 2020 - Strategic innovation agenda of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology - European Institute of Innovation and Technology (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0384(COD)
Competitiveness of enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (2014 - 2020) - Entrepreneurship 2020 action plan - Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0394(COD)
Multiannual financial framework 2014-2020 - Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2152(ACI)
Erasmus for all programme (A7-0405/2012 - Doris Pack)
2016/11/22
Creative Europe programme (A7-0011/2013 - Silvia Costa)
2016/11/22
Common provisions on European funds - European Social Fund - European Regional Development Fund and the 'investment for growth and jobs' goal - European Regional Development Fund and the 'European territorial cooperation' goal - Cohesion Fund - European grouping of territorial cooperation (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0268(COD)
Electronic communications - Recent proposals to complete the digital single market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2080(INI)
European Semester for economic policy coordination (A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira)
2016/11/22
Europski semestar za usklađivanje ekonomske politike (A7-0322/2013 - Elisa Ferreira) HR
2016/11/22
In vitro diagnostic medical devices - Medical devices (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/0266(COD)
EU citizens' mobility and Member States' welfare systems (debate)
2016/11/22
EU citizens' mobility and Member States' welfare systems (debate)
2016/11/22
Recent cases of violence and persecution against Christians, notably in Maaloula (Syria), Peshawar (Pakistan) and the case of Pastor Saeed Abedini (Iran) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2872(RSP)
EU and Member State measures to tackle the flow of refugees as a result of the conflict in Syria (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2837(RSP)
Recognition of professional qualifications and administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (A7-0038/2013 - Bernadette Vergnaud)
2016/11/22
EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement (B7-0436/2013, B7-0439/2013)
2016/11/22
EU-China negotiations for a bilateral investment agreement (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2674(RSP)
Cross-border collective bargaining and transnational social dialogue (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2292(INI)
Situation in Syria (RCB7-0413/2013, B7-0413/2013, B7-0423/2013, B7-0424/2013, B7-0425/2013, B7-0426/2013, B7-0427/2013, B7-0428/2013)
2016/11/22
State of the Union (debate)
2016/11/22
European strategy on health and safety at work (debate)
2016/11/22
Making the internal energy market work (A7-0262/2013 - Jerzy Buzek)
2016/11/22
Implementation of the EU youth strategy 2010-2012 - Tackling youth unemployment: possible ways out (debate)
2016/11/22
Union Customs Code (debate)
2016/11/22
Completing the digital single market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2655(RSP)
Impact of the crisis on access to care for vulnerable groups (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2044(INI)
Programme of activities of the Lithuanian Presidency (debate)
2016/11/22
Review of the Irish Presidency, including the MFF agreement (B7-0332/2013, RCB7-0334/2013, B7-0334/2013, B7-0335/2013, B7-0339/2013, B7-0340/2013)
2016/11/22
Rule of law in Russia
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2667(RSP)
Educational and occupational mobility of women (A7-0164/2013 - Licia Ronzulli)
2016/11/22
Evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis - Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0242(COD)
Annual report on competition policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2306(INI)
Social housing in the European Union (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2293(INI)
Social pillar of the economic and monetary union (debate)
2016/11/22
Preparations for the European Council meeting (22 May 2013) - Fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax havens - Annual tax report: how to free the EU potential for economic growth (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2025(INI)
Adequate, safe and sustainable pensions (A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten)
2016/11/22
EU Charter: standard settings for media freedom across the EU (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2132(INI)
Regional strategies for industrial areas in the European Union (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Financial assistance for Member States whose currency is not the euro (A7-0129/2013 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
2016/11/22
2012 comprehensive monitoring report on Croatia (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2871(RSP)
Groundhandling services at European Union airports (A7-0364/2012 - Artur Zasada)
2016/11/22
Situation in the Central African Republic
2016/11/22
Review of the Cyprus Presidency (debate)
2016/11/22
Administrative procedure law (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2024(INL)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2011 and the European Union's policy on the matter - EU's human rights strategy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2145(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0093(COD)
Prevention of age-related diseases of women (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2129(INI)
Completing the digital single market (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2030(INI)
Towards a genuine Economic and Monetary Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2151(INL)
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0271(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0271(COD)
Social Investment Pact (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2003(INI)
Single Market Act II - Concerns of European citizens and business with the functioning of the Single Market (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2044(INI)
Is ERASMUS in danger? (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0395(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0395(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0239(COD)
State of the Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0190(COD)
Programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0267(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0137(COD)
Preparation for the European Council meeting (28-29 June 2012) - Multiannual financial framework and own resources (debate)
2016/11/22
Future of the Single Market Act (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2663(RSP)
Towards a job-rich recovery (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2647(RSP)
Swiss quotas on the number of residence permits granted to nationals of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary (debate)
2016/11/22
A resource-efficient Europe (debate)
2016/11/22
Youth opportunities initiative (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2068(INI)
Preparation of the informal European summit - Investment, growth and jobs (debate)
2016/11/22
Roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0187(COD)
Coordination of social security systems (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0380(COD)
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Common consolidated corporate tax base (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0058(CNS)
Enlargement report for Serbia (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2886(RSP)
Enlargement report for Turkey (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2889(RSP)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (1-2 March 2012) (debate)
2016/11/22
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Equality between women and men in the European Union - 2011 - Women in political decision-making (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2295(INI)
Conclusions of the informal European Council meeting of 30 January 2012 (debate)
2016/11/22
Danish Presidency Programme (continuation of debate)
2016/11/22
Intelligent Energy Europe programme (debate)
2016/11/22
Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Health and safety at work (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2147(INI)
Conclusions of the European Council meeting (8-9 December 2011) (debate)
2016/11/22
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
2016/11/22
Preparations for the European Council meeting (8-9 December 2011) (debate)
2016/11/22
Accession Treaty : Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia - Application of Croatia to become a member of the European Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2191(INI)
European semester for economic policy coordination (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2071(INI)
Implementation of Professional Qualifications Directive (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2024(INI)
European Semester 2011: first lessons (debate)
2016/11/22
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Question Time (Commission)
2016/11/22
Surge in job dismissals in Europe as a result of the economic crisis in particular at Arcelor and Nokia (debate)
2016/11/22
Agenda for new skills and jobs (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2067(INI)
Situation of single mothers (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2049(INI)
American Jobs Act (debate)
2016/11/22
Preparation for the European Council meeting (23 October 2011) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2543(RSP)
State of the Union (debate)
2016/11/22
Question Hour with the President of the Eurogroup, Jean-Claude Juncker
2016/11/22
Main aspects of the common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy - Situation in Syria and in Camp Ashraf - Report: Albertini - Annual report from the Council to Parliament on the main aspects of CFSP in 2009 - Report: Gualtieri - Development of CSDP following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty - Report: Muñiz De Urquiza - The EU as a global actor: its role in multilateral organisations (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2299(INI)
Amendment of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union with regard to a stability mechanism for Member States whose currency is the euro (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0821(NLE)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States - Europe 2020 - Implementation of the guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0007(CNS)
Adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2239(INI)
Report on competition policy 2009 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2137(INI)
An EU Strategy for the Black Sea (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2087(INI)
Preparations for Cancún Climate Change Conference (29 November-10 December) (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2764(RSP)
Upcoming EU-US summit and Transatlantic Economic Council - EU-US Data Protection Agreement (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2898(RSP)
Security of gas supply (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0108(COD)
Trade and economic relations with Turkey (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2200(INI)
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0115(NLE)
The Belgian Presidency’s programme of activities (debate)
2016/11/22
Review of the Spanish Presidency (debate)
2016/11/22
One-minute speeches (Rule 150)
2016/11/22
Outcome of the summit of 7 May 2010 and the ECOFIN meeting - What is the political relevance of the EU 2020 strategy in the context of the current financial and economic crisis? - Consequences of the financial and economic crisis on the EU 2020 strategy and its governance - What is the relevance of the EU 2020 strategy in the framework of the current financial and economic crisis? (debate)
2016/11/22
Outcome of the summit of 7 May 2010 and the ECOFIN meeting - What is the political relevance of the EU 2020 strategy in the context of the current financial and economic crisis? - Consequences of the financial and economic crisis on the EU 2020 strategy and its governance - What is the relevance of the EU 2020 strategy in the framework of the current financial and economic crisis? (debate)
2016/11/22
Strategic goals and recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018 (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2095(INI)
ECB annual report for 2008 - Report on the 2009 Annual Statement on the Euro Area and Public Finances (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2090(INI)
Situation in Tibet (debate)
2016/11/22
Internal Market Scoreboard - Consumer protection - SOLVIT (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2141(INI)
2009 progress report on Croatia - 2009 progress report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - 2009 progress report on Turkey (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2768(RSP)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0105(COD)
Body scanners - Operation of intelligence services in the context of counter-terrorism strategies (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Question Hour with the President of the Commission
2016/11/22

Reports (3)

RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation of the Republic of Croatia as a Contracting Party, following its accession to the European Union PDF (375 KB) DOC (89 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2013/0321(NLE)
Documents: PDF(375 KB) DOC(89 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services PDF (697 KB) DOC (1 MB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/0061(COD)
Documents: PDF(697 KB) DOC(1 MB)
REPORT on Social Investment Pact – as a response to the crisis PDF (167 KB) DOC (102 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2012/2003(INI)
Documents: PDF(167 KB) DOC(102 KB)

Shadow reports (3)

REPORT on social dumping in the European Union PDF (540 KB) DOC (186 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2015/2255(INI)
Documents: PDF(540 KB) DOC(186 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States PDF (603 KB) DOC (330 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2016/0043(NLE)
Documents: PDF(603 KB) DOC(330 KB)
REPORT on creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century: matching skills and qualifications with demand and job opportunities, as a way to recover from the crisis PDF (220 KB) DOC (171 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2014/2235(INI)
Documents: PDF(220 KB) DOC(171 KB)

Opinions (3)

OPINION on investment for jobs and growth: promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in the Union
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(118 KB) DOC(179 KB)
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Fund for Strategic Investments and amending Regulations (EU) No 1291/2013 and (EU) No 1316/2013
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(232 KB) DOC(572 KB)
OPINION on: Are tools in place to monitor the effectiveness of European Social Fund spending on older workers? (Court of Auditors Special Report 25/2012)
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(181 KB)

Shadow opinions (7)

OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/22/EC as regards enforcement requirements and laying down specific rules with respect to Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU for posting drivers in the road transport sector
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2017/0121(COD)
Documents: PDF(248 KB) DOC(176 KB)
OPINION on Investing in jobs and growth – maximising the contribution of European Structural and Investment Funds: an evaluation of the report under Article 16(3) of the CPR
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2016/2148(INI)
Documents: PDF(137 KB) DOC(66 KB)
OPINION on family businesses in Europe
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2014/2210(INI)
Documents: PDF(123 KB) DOC(189 KB)
OPINION on the implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive 2005/36/EC
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2011/2024(INI)
Documents: PDF(117 KB) DOC(101 KB)
OPINION on the Green Paper entitled ‘Towards adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems’
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2010/2239(INI)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(115 KB)
OPINION on the Report 2010 on the implementation of the Cohesion Policy programmes for 2007-2013
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/2139(INI)
Documents: PDF(124 KB) DOC(99 KB)
OPINION on the long-term sustainability of public finances for a recovering economy
2016/11/22
Committee: EMPL
Dossiers: 2010/2038(INI)
Documents: PDF(121 KB) DOC(87 KB)

Institutional motions (1)

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the List of Issues adopted by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in relation to the initial report of the European Union PDF (254 KB) DOC (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2015/2684(RSP)
Documents: PDF(254 KB) DOC(72 KB)

Oral questions (6)

Breaches of the rights of children whose parents work in Austria PDF (50 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Commission's answers to written questions PDF (205 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(205 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Commission's approval of Germany's revised plan to introduce a road toll PDF (197 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/2526(RSP)
Documents: PDF(197 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Germany's law on minimum wage PDF (199 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(199 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Preventive measures to tackle the gender pension gap in the EU PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC
Commission's answers to Written Questions PDF DOC
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF DOC

Written explanations (20)

Better enforcement and modernisation of EU consumer protection rules (A8-0029/2019 - Daniel Dalton) PL

Badania zlecone przez Komisję Europejską i szereg rządów pokazały bardzo wyraźnie, że wiele produktów gorszej jakości trafia do sklepów w tzw. nowych państwach członkowskich. Dlatego też przedstawiciele tych krajów chcieli, przy okazji wprowadzania przepisów zmierzających do lepszego egzekwowania i unowocześnienia unijnych regulacji dotyczących ochrony konsumenta, zakazać praktyki umieszczania produktu niższej jakości w takim samym lub łudząco podobnym opakowaniu co produkt wyższej jakości. Parlament Europejski dzięki aktywności przedstawicieli Europejskiej Partii Ludowej wywalczył takie zapisy.Niestety jednak w rozmowach trójstronnych została zaakceptowana wersja Rady, która nie rozwiązuje istniejącego problemu. Zapisy proponowane przez Radę i zaakceptowane przez negocjatorów Parlamentu umożliwiają producentom dalsze stosowanie praktyki wypuszczania na rynek podwójnej jakości produktów w takim samym opakowaniu. Istotnym problemem jest to, że konsument zawsze będzie musiał w konkretnej sprawie udowadniać, że został wprowadzony w błąd. Z tego też powodu nie mogłam poprzeć tej wersji dyrektywy.Razem z ponad setką moich koleżanek i kolegów z większości krajów członkowskich chcieliśmy wpisania zakazu stosowania praktyki podwójnej jakości produktów do aneksu tej dyrektywy, który zawiera praktyki handlowe uznawane za nieuczciwe w każdych okolicznościach. W tym celu zgłosiliśmy poprawki na sesję plenarną. Niestety upadły, stąd mój głos przeciwko.
2016/11/22
Gender equality and taxation policies in the EU (A8-0416/2018 - Marisa Matias, Ernest Urtasun) PL

W całej Unii ogólny wskaźnik zatrudnienia kobiet utrzymuje się na poziomie niższym o prawie 12% od wskaźnika zatrudnienia mężczyzn. Ponadto większość z nich pracuje w niepełnym wymiarze. Z tego też powodu możemy zaobserwować zróżnicowanie wynagrodzeń i emerytur ze względu na płeć. Po części przyczyną takiej sytuacji jest brak podejścia uwzględniającego problematykę płci w unijnych i krajowych politykach podatkowych. Przede wszystkim zniechęca się kobiety do wchodzenia na rynek pracy i pozostawania na nim oraz powiela tradycyjne role i stereotypy dotyczące płci. Ponadto, strukturalna zmiana systemu podatkowego, która zaszła w ciągu ostatnich dekad, przesunęła obciążenie podatkowe na grupy o niskich dochodach, a więc przede wszystkim na kobiety. Dlatego potrzebne są zdecydowane działania na poziomie krajowym, które Unia Europejska powinna wspierać. Zdecydowanie opowiadam się za równością kobiet i mężczyzn, dążeniem do wdrożenia istniejących przepisów zwalczających wszelkie formy dyskryminacji kobiet w miejscu pracy, w edukacji i w życiu publicznym.Nie mogłam jednak poprzeć części rozwiązań zaproponowanych w niniejszym sprawozdaniu. Za szczególnie niebezpieczne uważam propozycje naruszające zasady proporcjonalności i pomocniczości – znoszące jednomyślność w głosowaniach nad kwestiami podatkowymi w Radzie UE oraz ingerujące w kompetencje państw członkowskich w tej mierze. Dlatego też zdecydowanie głosowałam przeciwko takim rozwiązaniom.
2016/11/22
Coordination of social security systems (A8-0386/2018 - Guillaume Balas) PL

Rewizja koordynacji systemów zabezpieczenia społecznego, nad którą dzisiaj głosowaliśmy, to dokument niezmiernie ważny dla pracowników i ich rodzin. Od zapisów obu rozporządzeń zależy to, czy pracownicy będą objęci ubezpieczeniem społecznym i czy będą mogli swobodnie przenosić swoje prawa, podróżując po UE w celu podjęcia pracy.Zdaję sobie sprawę, że praca nad tymi dokumentami nie była łatwa. Szanuję miesiące spędzone na negocjacjach, jednak ze względów merytorycznych nie mogłam poprzeć dzisiaj mandatu negocjacyjnego przyjętego w Komisji Zatrudniania. Przyjęte zapisy wprowadzą bowiem chaos i doprowadzą do fragmentaryzacji zabezpieczenia społecznego.Skrócenie z 24 do 18 miesięcy okresu, podczas którego pracownik ubezpieczony jest w kraju wysyłającym, oraz znaczące zmiany w artykule 13, które dotkną szczególnie wysoce mobilnych pracowników jak np. kierowców czy pracowników sektora opieki – to wszystko są zapisy, które negatywnie wpłyną na sytuację pracownika. Istnieje ryzyko, że pracownicy będą ubezpieczeni w kilku krajach jednocześnie, ich rodziny nie będą miały dostępu opieki zdrowotnej w miejscu zamieszkania. Dodatkowo, aby w przyszłości otrzymać emeryturę, pracownicy będą musieli domagać się swoich praw w kilku krajach jednocześnie.Sprawozdanie zawiera także niejasne zapisy dotyczące wydawania i wycofywania formularzy A1, które już zostały krytycznie ocenione przez instytucje zabezpieczenia społecznego.To wszystko spowodowało, że zagłosowałam przeciwko mandatowi.
2016/11/22
Rail passengers' rights and obligations (A8-0340/2018 - Bogusław Liberadzki) PL

. – Celem rozporządzenia 1371/2007 jest ochrona pasażerów w ruchu kolejowym w Unii Europejskiej. Podobnie jak pasażerowie korzystający z innych środków transportu mają oni prawo do uzyskania informacji, rezerwacji biletów, pomocy, opieki i odszkodowania w przypadku opóźnienia lub odwołania pociągu, odszkodowania w razie wypadku oraz szybkiego i dostępnego systemu rozpatrywania skarg. Przede wszystkim mają jednak prawo oczekiwać pełnego stosowania i skutecznego egzekwowania przepisów unijnego prawa przez krajowe organy odpowiedzialne za egzekwowanie przepisów. Oceny skutków stosowania owego rozporządzenia pokazują jednak, że istnieją pewne problemy z jego efektywnością, wynikające przede wszystkim z nadużywania przez państwa członkowskie wyłączeń spod obowiązywania tego prawa. Rozwiązania, które miały służyć uniknięciu dyskryminacyjnego traktowania niektórych przewoźników, w praktyce osłabiły skuteczność rozporządzenia. Dlatego też popieram stanowisko Parlamentu Europejskiego oraz postulat aby w jak największym stopniu ograniczyć możliwość stosowania przez państwa członkowskie owych wyłączeń.
2016/11/22
Empowering competition authorities and ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market (A8-0057/2018 - Andreas Schwab) PL

. – Krajowe organy ochrony konkurencji państw członkowskich są dla Komisji Europejskiej partnerami o decydującym znaczeniu w procesie egzekwowania unijnych reguł konkurencji. Są więc one istotnym elementem procesu tworzenia konkurencyjnego rynku wewnętrznego. Od 2004 r. Komisja i krajowe organy ochrony konkurencji przyjęły ponad tysiąc decyzji w sprawie egzekwowania tych reguł, przy czym 85% z nich przyjętych zostało na poziomie państw członkowskich. Istnieją jednak luki oraz ograniczenia w odniesieniu do narzędzi i gwarancji, jakimi dysponują krajowe organy ochrony konkurencji. Oznacza to, że przedsiębiorstwa angażujące się w praktyki antykonkurencyjne mogą mieć do czynienia z bardzo różnorodnymi wynikami postępowań, w zależności od tego, w którym państwie członkowskim prowadzą działalność. Z tego też powodu w pełni popieram wniosek legislacyjny. Niemniej jednak wymaga on pewnych korekt. Przede wszystkim należy wzmocnić niezależność krajowych organów ochrony konkurencji przed naciskami ze strony świata polityki i biznesu. Dlatego należy wprowadzić do dyrektywy przepisy zabezpieczające przed konfliktami interesów, a także zobowiązania dotyczące wprowadzenia przejrzystej procedury wyborów i odwołań ze strony krajowych organów ochrony konkurencji oraz ich kierownictwa. Po drugie, należy zapewnić krajowym organom większą autonomię w wykorzystywaniu przydzielonych im środków budżetowych. Pozwoli to im samodzielnie określić priorytety prac oraz umożliwi przeprowadzanie wielu kontroli równocześnie.
2016/11/22
Digitalisation for development: reducing poverty through technology (A8-0338/2018 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta) PL

. – Pomimo tego, że na całym świecie występuje ogromny wzrost usług łączności mobilnej, to jednak nadal ponad połowa ludzkości pozostaje poza internetem. Ponadto wiele krajów rozwijających się i gospodarek wschodzących pozostaje w tyle pod względem korzystania z cyfryzacji, a między poszczególnymi krajami oraz między obszarami miejskimi i wiejskimi istnieją duże różnice. Nadal więc łączność pozostaje wyzwaniem i problemem leżącym u podstaw różnego rodzaju przepaści cyfrowej, zarówno w zakresie dostępu do technologii informacyjno-komunikacyjnych, jak i korzystania z nich. Warto to uwypuklić, bowiem w Konsensusie europejskim w sprawie rozwoju z 2017 r. podkreśla się znaczenie technologii i usług informacyjno-komunikacyjnych jako czynników umożliwiających zrównoważony rozwój i wzrost sprzyjający włączeniu społecznemu. Z tego też powodu należy z zadowoleniem przyjąć strategię Komisji w sprawie cyfryzacji na rzecz rozwoju, w zakresie, w jakim włącza ona technologie cyfrowe w główny nurt unijnej polityki rozwoju. Nie możemy jednak zapominać, że w niektórych krajach nadal konieczne jest zaspokojenie podstawowych potrzeb ludzkich, zwłaszcza w zakresie dostępu do żywności, energii, wody, urządzeń sanitarnych, edukacji i opieki zdrowotnej. Podsumowując, należy stwierdzić, że technologie i usługi cyfrowe mają ogromny potencjał w osiąganiu celów zrównoważonego rozwoju, ale powinny one raczej uzupełniać tradycyjne działania i inicjatywy, a nie je zastępować.
2016/11/22
Dual quality of products in the Single Market (A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová) PL

Przeprowadzone badania pokazują, że niektórzy producenci sprzedają towary o różnych normach jakości pod tą samą marką i o identycznym wyglądzie. Istotne jest przy tym, że niektóre produkty w części państw członkowskich zawierają mniej głównego składnika, albo też składniki wyższej jakości zastępowane są w nich składnikami niższej jakości. Co więcej, niejednokrotnie produkty o niższej jakości są droższe niż ich wyższej jakości odpowiedniki dostępne w innych częściach Unii.Zaobserwowano również znaczące różnice w produktach dla niemowląt, czego nie da się uzasadnić regionalnymi preferencjami smakowymi. Wydaje się oczywiste, że przedsiębiorstwa, które promują, sprzedają lub dostarczają produkty, powinny zapewniać dokładne i zrozumiałe informacje dotyczące ich składu, aby umożliwić podjęcie świadomej decyzji o zakupie. Konsumenci łączą markę, produkt oraz jakość, a zatem oczekują, że produkty tej samej marki lub o identycznym wyglądzie będą identyczne również pod względem jakości, niezależnie od tego, gdzie są sprzedawane.Sprzedaż w różnych częściach Unii tych samych produktów, ale o celowo odmiennym składzie jest nieuczciwą praktyką i jako taka powinna być ona niedopuszczalna. Z tego względu popieram propozycję dodania tej wprowadzającej w błąd praktyki handlowej do załącznika I dyrektywy 2005/29/WE. Konieczne jest również rozwinięcie na poziomie unijnym zdolności do monitorowania spójności składu i proporcjonalnego wykorzystania składników produktów sprzedawanych w tym samym opakowaniu i pod tą samą marką.
2016/11/22
The situation in Hungary (A8-0250/2018 - Judith Sargentini) PL

Szanowni Państwo! Głosowałam za tą rezolucją, ponieważ uważam, że poważne naruszenie przez państwo członkowskie wartości zapisanych w art. 2 TUE nie dotyczy wyłącznie kraju, w którym to nastąpiło, ale wywiera wpływ na pozostałe państwa członkowskie, na ich wzajemne zaufanie i prawa podstawowe obywateli. UE musi więc aktywnie działać, aby nie dopuszczać do takich sytuacji.Jest to o tyle istotne, że w coraz większej liczbie państw członkowskich możemy zaobserwować praktyki naruszające unijne wartości. Nie są to już tylko Węgry czy Polska, ale również takie kraje jak Rumunia, Chorwacja czy Słowacja. Dlatego też konieczne jest podjęcie zdecydowanych działań tam, gdzie wyraźnie naruszono wartości UE.Węgry od lat wskazywane są jako państwo systemowo łamiące wartości europejskie. Można wskazać dwanaście obszarów, gdzie systemowo naruszane są wartości europejskie. Wszystkie one są niezmiernie ważne, ale moim zdaniem kluczowe znaczenie ma wolność i niezależność mediów w tym państwie. Zmiany w prawie dokonane przez węgierski rząd spowodowały, że nie ma w zasadzie w tym kraju mediów, które nie byłyby pod bezpośrednim lub pośrednim wpływem rządu. Przede wszystkim nastąpiła zbytnia koncentracja własności mediów w rękach osób związanych z rządzącą partią. Powszechna jest autocenzura.Bez zmiany w tym obszarze nie uda się ani zwalczyć korupcji i ograniczyć nadużyć władzy, ani też przeprowadzać w pełni demokratycznych wyborów.
2016/11/22
Pathways for the reintegration of workers recovering from injury and illness into quality employment (A8-0208/2018 - Jana Žitňanská) PL

Specjaliści podkreślają, że rehabilitacja pracowników obejmuje trzy odrębne aspekty: medyczny, społeczny i zawodowy. W dzisiejszej dyskusji koncentrujemy się przede wszystkim na ostatnim wymiarze, ale nie możemy zapominać o pozostałych. Należy jednak podkreślić, że praca odgrywa ważną rolę w ułatwianiu procesu powrotu do zdrowia i rehabilitacji z uwagi na jej istotne korzyści psychospołeczne. Reintegracja osób powracających do pracy po urazie bądź chorobie fizycznej lub psychicznej zmniejsza też koszty ponoszone przez krajowe systemy zabezpieczenia społecznego. Tak więc powinniśmy dążyć w Unii do tego, aby osoby po przebytych urazach lub chorobach jak najszybciej powracały na rynek pracy.Problemem jest jednak to, że aż w ¼ przypadków konieczne byłoby stworzenie specjalnych warunków, aby umożliwić powrót do pracy. Niejednokrotnie wystarczy zaoferowanie elastycznej, dostosowanej do indywidualnych potrzeb organizacji pracy, takiej jak praca zdalna, ruchomy czas pracy, skrócenie czasu pracy, zmniejszenie obciążenia pracą lub dostosowany sprzęt. Pamiętajmy jednak, że większość osób w Unii zatrudnionych jest w małych, średnich i mikroprzedsiębiorstwach. Te zaś ze względu na swój rozmiar i potencjał mają mniej zasobów potrzebnych do dostosowania się do potrzeb osób powracających do pracy po urazach lub chorobach. Z tego też względu potrzebują one publicznego wsparcia.
2016/11/22
Implementation of the Bologna Process – state of play and follow-up (B8-0190/2018) PL

Proces boloński wywołuje mieszane uczucia w środowisku akademickim. Z jednej strony docenia się możliwości, które w jego wyniku powstały, na przykład dotyczące mobilności studentów i pracowników naukowych czy też wzajemnego uznawania kwalifikacji w państwach europejskich. Z drugiej jednak postrzega się bardzo krytycznie pozorność niektórych zmian i rozrost biurokracji.W większości państw krytyka koncentruje się na wprowadzeniu trzystopniowego cyklu studiów, który prowadzi niejednokrotnie do wypuszczania absolwentów bez wystarczających umiejętności i kwalifikacji. Często negatywnie oceniane są również system punktów ECTS i efekty kształcenia. Na kolejnych szczytach ministerialnych wyznacza się kolejne priorytety bez przeprowadzenia pogłębionej refleksji nad rzeczywistymi efektami już podjętych działań.Stworzenie Europejskiego Obszaru Szkolnictwa Wyższego nie przełożyło się na podniesienie poziomu nauki i dydaktyki na europejskich uczelniach. Nie zmniejszyło również rozdźwięku między kształceniem a potrzebami rynku pracy. Europejskie uczelnie nadal pozostają daleko za amerykańskimi ośrodkami akademickimi i coraz częściej są wyprzedzane przez te ulokowane w państwach azjatyckich.Zagłosowałam za tą rezolucją, aby wezwać Komisję Europejską i Radę do dyskusji nad tym, co wymaga poprawy. Nie możemy ciągle udawać, że w ciągu minionych dwóch dekad sytuacja radykalnie się poprawiła.
2016/11/22
Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (A8-0373/2017 - Mercedes Bresso, Rainer Wieland) PL

Poparłam wynik negocjacji w sprawie zmiany rozporządzenia dotyczącego statusu i finansowania europejskich partii politycznych, gdyż niewątpliwie wymagało ono nowelizacji. Minione lata wyraźnie pokazały, że w obowiązujących regulacjach istnieją liczne luki, które były i nadal są wykorzystywane przez część ugrupowań do nielegalnego finasowania swojej działalności krajowej. OLAF badał lub bada sprawy Duńskiej Partii Ludowej, litewskiego Porządku i Sprawiedliwości czy Solidarnej Polski. W dobrym kierunku idzie propozycja nowelizacji sugerująca, że tego typu kwestiami powinna zajmować się Prokuratura Europejska. Pozwoliłoby to uniknąć niejasności w sytuacjach, kiedy to jeden z oskarżonych o defraudację unijnych pieniędzy stoi w swoim kraju na czele prokuratury, tak jak to ma miejsce w przypadku Polski. Niemniej jednak należy pamiętać, że Prokuratura Europejska ustanowiona jest w ramach wzmocnionej współpracy – do której to Polska w tym przypadku nie przystąpiła – więc nie wszystkimi sprawami będzie się mogła zajmować.Właściwym rozwiązaniem jest również obniżenie niezbędnego współfinansowania do poziomu 10% w połączeniu z ograniczeniem możliwości wspierania europejskich partii i fundacji politycznych jedynie do partii krajowych, a nie osób fizycznych. Utrudni to stosowanie praktyki tzw. okrężnych przepływów finansowych.
2016/11/22
Empowering women and girls through the digital sector (B8-0183/2018) PL

Nadal mocny jest stereotyp głoszący, że kobiety nie mają umysłów ścisłych i nie nadają się do pracy w zawodach wymagających umiejętności technicznych. Tym tłumaczy się najczęściej niewielką reprezentację kobiet na politechnikach oraz w sektorze nowych technologii. Jest to duży problem, bowiem szacuje się, że już obecnie brakuje w Unii blisko miliona pracowników w gospodarce cyfrowej. Dodatkowo niedobór ten się pogłębi, gdyż w niedalekiej przyszłości wykonywanie większości zawodów będzie wymagało posiadania umiejętności cyfrowych. Jeżeli więc już teraz poziom zatrudnienia wśród kobiet jest dużo niższy niż wśród mężczyzn, a poza tym zarabiają one mniej i częściej pracują w ramach elastycznych form zatrudnienia, to te problemy z pewnością zaostrzą się w przyszłości wraz z rozrostem gospodarki cyfrowej.Powinniśmy więc jak najszybciej nie tylko podjąć działania zachęcające dziewczęta do nauki przedmiotów ścisłych, ale także usprawnić przekwalifikowywanie się w celu zdobycia umiejętności cyfrowych. Przełoży się to na poprawę sytuacji kobiet na rynku pracy, jak również ograniczy lukę cyfrową, na którą narzekają pracodawcy. W zasadzie wszyscy na tym skorzystają. Dziwi mnie więc, że do tej pory nie podjęto efektywnych działań ani na poziomie państw członkowskich, ani Unii jako całości. Wierzę, że dzisiejsza rezolucja stworzy kolejny impuls do działań w tym zakresie.
2016/11/22
Protection and non-discrimination with regard to minorities in the EU Member States (B8-0064/2018) PL

Obowiązek ochrony i przeciwdziałania dyskryminacji mniejszości jest nie tylko wyraźnie wskazany w prawie konstytucyjnym państw członkowskich, ale również wynika z prawa unijnego i międzynarodowego. Pomimo tego Komisja Petycji Parlamentu Europejskiego otrzymuje każdego roku wiele skarg wyrażających zaniepokojenie różnymi praktykami dyskryminującymi obywateli Unii należących do mniejszości. Dlatego też należy gruntownie przeanalizować te petycje, aby zrozumieć problemy nurtujące obywateli oraz zaproponować odpowiednie rozwiązania. Formy dyskryminowania mniejszości w poszczególnych krajach mogą być bardzo zróżnicowane. Przykładem jest sytuacja osób mających polskie pochodzenie. Na Litwie uniemożliwia się im pisanie nazwisk w języku ojczystym, zabronione są dwujęzyczne tablice z nazwami ulic i miejscowości w zdominowanych przez te osoby regionach, czy też doświadczają one dyskryminacji przy reprywatyzacji. Polacy mieszkający w Niemczech od dekad nie są uznawani za mniejszość narodowościową. Z kolei w Polsce, pomimo stosunkowo dobrych rozwiązań prawnych regulujących status mniejszości narodowych i etnicznych, możemy zaobserwować dyskryminacyjną praktykę dotykającą osób pochodzenia romskiego czy też obywateli Unii mających pozaeuropejskie korzenie. Na tym przykładzie widać, że problemy z dyskryminacją mniejszości w państwach członkowskich są zróżnicowane. Dlatego też zgadzam się ze sprawozdawczynią, że w Unii brakuje skutecznych narzędzi do monitorowania poszanowania praw mniejszości. Wobec niepokojących tendencji wydaje się, że konieczne jest stworzenie skutecznego ogólnounijnego mechanizmu monitorowania sytuacji mniejszości w państwach członkowskich.
2016/11/22
The situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland (B8-0594/2017, B8-0595/2017) PL

Podczas dzisiejszego posiedzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego po raz piąty odbyła się debata na temat stanu praworządności w Polsce. Parlament Europejski po raz trzeci, ogromną większością głosów, przyjął rezolucję, w której wyraża zaniepokojenie sytuacją w moim kraju oraz wzywa do przestrzegania Konstytucji RP. Rezolucja w klarowny i bezstronny sposób opisuje szereg zaniechań, których w ostatnim czasie dopuścił się rząd PiS. Nieprzestrzeganie postanowień Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, stworzenie z Trybunału instytucji politycznej, łamanie orzeczeń Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE w przypadku wycinki lasów w Puszczy Białowieskiej, przyjęcie niekonstytucyjnej ustawy o Ustroju Sądów Powszechnych, przeprowadzanie reformy sądownictwa bez jakiejkolwiek dyskusji publicznej i konsultacji z partnerami - to wszystko są dowody na to, że rządy prawa i demokracja są w Polsce zagrożone. Rezolucja zawiera jeszcze jeden ważny element. Wzywa Komisję Wolności Obywatelskich PE do przygotowania raportu na temat sytuacji w Polsce. Skoro rząd PiS nie chce rozmawiać z Komisją Europejską argumentując, że jest to tylko grupa urzędników, to może zacznie rozmawiać z Europarlamentarzystami, wybranymi w demokratycznych wyborach. Chciałabym także podkreślić, że w rezolucji nie pada ani jedno zdanie, które wzywałoby do nałożenia na Polskę sankcji. Jest jedynie mowa o procedurze, która w konsekwencji może do takiej sytuacji dopuścić, chyba że PiS nas przekona, że demokracja w Polsce nie jest zagrożona.
2016/11/22
Minimum income policies as a tool for fighting poverty (A8-0292/2017 - Laura Agea) PL

Pomimo tego, że Europa jest najzamożniejszym regionem świata, to jednak dane dotyczące ubóstwa pokazują wzrost w ostatnich latach biedy i wykluczenia społecznego. Blisko 25% obywateli Unii zagrożonych jest ubóstwem, w tym również osoby posiadające stałe zatrudnienie. Widać wyraźnie, że kryzys zapoczątkowany w 2008 roku okazał się najbardziej dotkliwy dla osób o niższych dochodach. Od paru lat próbujemy znaleźć efektywne instrumenty pozwalające poprawić sytuację zarówno na rynku pracy, jak i osób żyjących w skrajnej biedzie. Od jakiegoś czasu dyskutuje się o konieczności wprowadzenia tzw. dochodu minimalnego. Pewne próby w tej materii podjęte zostały w Finlandii i Szwecji, ale ich pierwsze efekty nie są zachęcające. W raporcie sprawozdawczyni podjęła także próbę stworzenia europejskiej dyrektywy ramowej w sprawie minimalnego dochodu. Nie mogę zgodzić się z taką propozycją. Polityka w obszarze włączenia społecznego należy do wyłącznych kompetencji państw członkowskich. Rozwiązania muszą być bowiem dopasowane do istniejących potrzeb, lokalnych rynków pracy oraz systemu zabezpieczenia społecznego. Z tych wszystkich powodów nie ma potrzeby kreowania rozwiązań na poziomie unijnym. Państwa członkowskie, a także władze regionalne i lokalne mają dużo większe rozeznanie w lokalnej specyfice i to one dużo efektywniej mogą sobie poradzić w walce z ubóstwem i wykluczeniem społecznym.
2016/11/22
Accessibility requirements for products and services (A8-0188/2017 - Morten Løkkegaard) PL

Zaproponowany przez Komisję Europejską wniosek legislacyjny jest istotny z dwóch powodów. Po pierwsze, zapewni on lepsze funkcjonowanie jednolitego rynku. Zharmonizowanie przepisów regulujących wymogi dostępności produktów i usług tak aby mogły z nich korzystać osoby niepełnosprawne lub z ograniczoną funkcjonalnością, zniweluje ilość barier utrudniających wymianę handlową pomiędzy państwami członkowskimi. Tym samym wykonany zostanie kolejny krok w kierunku pogłębienia handlu wewnątrzunijnego, co samo w sobie jest bardzo istotne. Po drugie, dyrektywa przyczyni się do włączenia społecznego ogromnej ilości osób mających specyficzne potrzeby wynikające z ich ograniczonej funkcjonalności. Procedowany akt prawny doprowadzi do zwiększenia konkurencji na rynku, a więc i obniżenia cen produktów i usług, przez co będą one dostępne dla większej grupy osób. Jeżeli spojrzeć na jego zakres przedmiotowy, to widać że harmonizacja przepisów dotyczących dostępności będzie obejmowała produkty i usługi niezbędne do normalnego funkcjonowania w dzisiejszym świecie, takie jak usługi bankowe, telefoniczne i transportowe, handel elektroniczny czy książki i czasopisma w wersji elektronicznej. W dzisiejszym świecie, kiedy nowe technologie i technologie informacyjno-komunikacyjne wkraczają w kolejne obszary ludzkiego życia, brak dostępu do wspomnianych usług i produktów nie tylko utrudnia, ale wręcz uniemożliwia normalne funkcjonowanie. Z tych wszystkich powodów należy jak najszybciej przyjąć omawiany wniosek legislacyjny.
2016/11/22
Online platforms and the Digital Single Market (A8-0204/2017 - Henna Virkkunen, Philippe Juvin) PL

Gospodarka cyfrowa odgrywa coraz istotniejszą rolę w tworzeniu miejsc pracy w ramach Unii Europejskiej. Nie istnieją jeszcze w pełni wiarygodne dane, ale wyraźnie widać, że wzrasta ilość osób pracujących za pomocą szeroko rozumianych platform internetowych bądź w ramach tzw. telepracy.W tym kontekście chciałabym zwrócić uwagę na dwie ważne kwestie. Po pierwsze, wydaje się, że gospodarka cyfrowa nie dostarcza wystarczającej liczby miejsc pracy tam, gdzie to jest najbardziej potrzebne, tj. dla długotrwale bezrobotnych, osób dotkniętych wykluczeniem społecznym i mieszkańców obszarów wiejskich. Podstawowymi przeszkodami w tym przypadku są takie czynniki jak przepaść cyfrowa lub brak umiejętności technologicznych. Komisja i poszczególne rządy powinny podjąć zdecydowane działania, aby rozwiązać ten problem.Po drugie, bardzo ważna jest kwestia objęcia pracowników wykonujących pracę w ramach gospodarki cyfrowej odpowiednimi przepisami dotyczącymi zabezpieczenia społecznego. Na pewno konieczne jest zbadanie obowiązujących przepisów dotyczących zabezpieczenia społecznego oraz wprowadzenie reform nadążających za zmianami technologicznymi i zapewniających ochronę pracowników. Z tego względu pozytywnie oceniam rozpoczęcie przez Komisję Europejską konsultacji społecznych w tym zakresie.
2016/11/22
Rates of value added tax applied to books, newspapers and periodicals (A8-0189/2017 - Tom Vandenkendelaere) PL

Zmiany zaproponowane w dyrektywie VAT-owskiej są niezbędne po to, aby Unia mogła nadążyć za rozwojem gospodarki cyfrowej. Z tego też powodu wpisują się w działania zmierzające do urzeczywistnienia jednolitego rynku cyfrowego. Coraz więcej osób, szczególnie młodych, korzysta z e-booków oraz cyfrowych wersji gazet i czasopism. Jest to szczególnie istotne w przypadku tych ostatnich, bowiem pomaga im pozyskać czytelników, a co za tym idzie opłaty za tworzone treści. Okazuje się, że w czasach tzw. fake news coraz więcej ludzi jest gotowych płacić za dobrze przygotowane i wiarygodne treści. To może być więc szansa na przetrwanie dla niezależnej prasy, która jest fundamentem dobrze funkcjonującej demokracji. Obniżając VAT na gazety i czasopisma, być może skłonimy jeszcze większą liczbę osób do zakupu określonych tytułów w wersji elektronicznej. Z tych też powodów proponowane zmiany są wręcz konieczne. Dlatego głosowałam za sprawozdaniem.
2016/11/22
Multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020 (Resolution) (A8-0117/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas) PL

Przegląd wieloletnich ram finansowych toczy się obecnie w niecodziennych okolicznościach. Unia nadal zmaga się z problemami gospodarczymi, w wielu krajach bezrobocie, szczególnie wśród osób młodych, jest ogromne, a bezprecedensowy napływ uchodźców w ciągu ostatnich dwóch lat stanowi istotne wyzwanie finansowe dla państw członkowskich. W dodatku w zeszłym tygodniu formalnie rozpoczęła się procedura wyjścia Wielkiej Brytanii z Unii Europejskiej, co oznacza konieczność uzgodnienia wkładu tego państwa do unijnego budżetu po 2019 r. Widać więc, że wieloletni budżet musi zostać de facto na nowo skonstruowany.Dla mnie osobiście myśl ta jest o tyle trudna, iż pochodzę z kraju, który jest jednym z największych beneficjentów obecnej perspektywy finansowej. Dlatego też, rozumiejąc złożoność sytuacji, stoję na stanowisku, że jakiejkolwiek zmiany nie powinny odbić się negatywnie na wysokości środków przeznaczonych dla najbiedniejszych regionów w Europie. Nowelizacja ram finansowych nie może bowiem dotknąć najbardziej potrzebujących i naruszać zasady ochrony praw nabytych. Dlatego też brakujących pieniędzy w pierwszej kolejności powinniśmy szukać tam, gdzie są one marnowane, albo pozostają niewykorzystane. Cieszę się, że w nowelizacji zaproponowano wprowadzenie tzw. instrumentu elastyczności, z którego finansowane byłyby nieprzewidywane, pojawiające się w czasie trwania wieloletnich ram, wydatki. Dlatego też poprałam dzisiaj rezolucję na temat przyszłości Wieloletnich ram finansowych.
2016/11/22
Civil Law Rules on Robotics (A8-0005/2017 - Mady Delvaux) PL

Ponieważ automatyzacja i robotyka to nasza przyszłość i szansa na lepszy rozwój głosowałam za sprawozdaniem. W ostatnich latach nastąpił gwałtowny rozwój w obszarze robotyki i sztucznej inteligencji. W pełni autonomiczne maszyny staną się codziennością w naszym życiu nie tylko w pracy, ale również w domu czy na ulicy. Dlatego cieszę się, że powstał raport z inicjatywy Parlamentu Europejskiego, który proponuje pewne ramy prawne i etyczne w dziedzinie robotyki i automatyzacji. Kwestie związane z bezpieczeństwem i odpowiedzialnością prawną musza zostać wyjaśnione.Wzmożony rozwój robotyki i automatyzacji ma także ogromny wpływ na rynek pracy - to fakt przed którym nie uciekniemy. Dlatego też powinniśmy skupiać się na korzyściach i szansach płynących z takiej sytuacji, oczywiście nie zapominając o wyzwaniach z tym związanych. Jednym z nieuniknionych efektów automatyzacji będzie zanikanie niektórych zawodów bądź stanowisk pracy - szczególnie tych wykorzystujących pracę mięśni, rutynowych. Jednak badania pokazują, że zaledwie 5% wszystkich zawodów może ulec całkowitej automatyzacji. Pozostałe tylko skorzystają na współpracy z robotami.W tym kontekście powinniśmy szukać sposobów na to, jak poprzez automatyzację zwiększyć produktywność, a ludzką inteligencję wykorzystywać do działań bardziej kreatywnych. To łączy się z potrzebą ustawicznego kształcenia oraz rozwijania umiejętności miękkich takich jak kreatywność, inteligencja emocjonalna czy umiejętność zarządzania czasem i zasobami ludzkimi.
2016/11/22

Major interpellations (1)

Breaches of the rights of children whose parents work in Austria PDF (48 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(48 KB) DOC(19 KB)

Written questions (21)

Plastic EHIC PDF (41 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(41 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Oversize transport - red tape PDF (42 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(42 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Retroactive application of the rules on the posting of workers PDF (43 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Long-term posting - calculation of the posting period PDF (89 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(89 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Payment of VAT in the form of SEPA DD B2B PDF (186 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(186 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Directive amending Directive 96/71/EC - posting of workers PDF (89 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(89 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Directive amending Directive 96/71/EC - application to contracts in progress PDF (88 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(88 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Child benefits in Austria PDF (97 KB) DOC (20 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(20 KB)
French law levying a fee of EUR 40 per posted worker PDF (97 KB) DOC (18 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(97 KB) DOC(18 KB)
Infringement of the principles of equal and dignified treatment of seasonal workers PDF (43 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(43 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Posting of workers from non-EU countries to the EU PDF (89 KB) DOC (19 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(89 KB) DOC(19 KB)
Molière clause in French regions and the freedom to provide services PDF (89 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(89 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Application of the dialogue and conciliation procedure established by Decision of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems No A1 PDF (185 KB) DOC (17 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(185 KB) DOC(17 KB)
Violations of the rights of German communities in the redefinition of the boundaries of the city of Opole (Poland) PDF (187 KB) DOC (16 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(16 KB)
Transposition of Directive 2014/67/EU on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services PDF (187 KB) DOC (15 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(15 KB)
Problems with recognition of European Health Insurance Card PDF (89 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(89 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Implementation of Directive 96/71/EC and posting employees abroad - travel and subsistence expenses PDF (184 KB) DOC (23 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(184 KB) DOC(23 KB)
Progress made in the implementation of the Recommendation on a Quality Framework for Traineeships PDF (198 KB) DOC (30 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(198 KB) DOC(30 KB)
Investor guarantees and a change to legislation in force PDF (193 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(193 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Implementing Directive 2014/67/EU on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services PDF (187 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(25 KB)
Systematic regulation of the allocation by Greece of taxpayer identification numbers to foreigners for pension purposes PDF (188 KB) DOC (25 KB)
2016/11/22
Documents: PDF(188 KB) DOC(25 KB)

Written declarations (5)

Written declaration on improving the early diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases among women

Written declaration on protection of people with autism from bullying

Amendments (1380)

Amendment 74 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The ESF+ should aim to promote employment through active interventions enabling (re)integration into the labour market, notably for youth, the long-term unemployed and the inactive, as well as through promoting self–employment and the social economy. The ESF+ should aim to improve the functioning of labour markets by supporting the modernisation of labour market institutions such as the Public Employment Services in order to improve their capacity to provide intensified targeted counselling and guidance during the job search and the transition to employment and to enhancfacilitate workers’ mobility. The ESF+ should promote women’s participation in the labour market through measures aiming to ensure, amongst others, improved work/life balance and access to childcare. The ESF + should also aim to provide a healthy and well-adapted working environment in order to respond to health risks related to changing forms of work and the needs of the ageing workforce.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The ESF+ should provide support to improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems in order to facilitate the acquisition of key competences notably as regards entrepreneurial and digital skills which all individuals need for personal fulfilment and development, employment, social inclusion and active citizenship. The ESF+ should help progression within education and training and transition to work, support lifelong learning and employability, and contribute to competitiveness and societal and economic innovation by supporting scalable and sustainable initiatives in these fields. This could be achieved for example through work-based learning and apprenticeships, lifelong guidance, skills anticipation in cooperation with industry, up-to-date training materials, forecasting and graduate tracking, training of educators, validation of learning outcomes and recognition of qualifications.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The ESF+ should promote flexible upskilling and reskilling opportunities for all, notably entrepreneurial and digital skills and key enabling technologies, with a view to providing people with skills adjusted to digitalisation, technological change, innovation and social and economic change, facilitating career transitions, mobility and supporting in particular low-skilled and/or poorly qualified adults, in line with the Skills Agenda for Europe.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The ESF+ should support Member States’ efforts to tackle poverty with a view to breaking the cycle of disadvantage across generations and promote social inclusion by ensuring equal opportunities for all, tackling discrimination and addressing health inequalities. This implies mobilising a range of policies and strategies targeting the most disadvantaged people regardless of their age, including children, people with disabilities, marginalised communities such as the Roma, and the working poor. The ESF+ should promote the active inclusion of people far from the labour market with a view to ensuring their socio-economic integration. The ESF+ should be also used to enhance timely and equal access to affordable, sustainable and high quality services such as healthcare and long-term care, in particular family and community- based care services. The ESF+ should contribute to the modernisation of social security institutions and public employment services and social protection systems with a view in particular to promoting their accessibility and effectiveness in responding to the changing realities of world of work.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 309 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) improving access to employment of all jobseekers, in particular youth anddisadvantaged groups such as youth, older people, long- term unemployed, and ofpersons with disabilities, as well as inactive people, promoting self-employment and the social economy;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point iv
(iv) improving the quality, effectiveness and labour market relevance of education and training systems, to support acquisition of key competences including entrepreneurial and digital skills;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point vi
(vi) promoting lifelong learning, notably flexible upskilling and reskilling opportunities for all taking into account entrepreneurial and digital skills, better anticipating change and new skills requirements based on labour market needs, facilitating career transitions and promoting professional mobility;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point ix
(ix) enhancing the equal and timely access to quality, sustainable and affordable services; modernising social security institutions and public employment services and social protection systems, including promoting access to social protection; improving accessibility, effectiveness and resilience of healthcare systems and long-term care services;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 375 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point xi a (new)
(xia) (xii) enhancing institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders and efficient public administration;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 377 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point xi b (new)
(xib) (xiii) increasing the socioeconomic integration of marginalised communities, migrants and disadvantaged groups, through integrated measures including housing and social services;
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 378 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point xi c (new)
(xic) (xiv) improving accessibility to goods, services and physical environment in order to enable persons with disabilities to live independently and participate fully in all aspects of life, on an equal basis with others.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 2 a (new)
2a. 3. a Europe closer to citizens through poverty reduction and social inclusion measures taking into account the specificities of urban, rural and coastal areas in view of tackling the socio- economic inequalities in cities and regions.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 454 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall allocate an appropriate amount of their ESF+ resources under shared management to address challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations adopted in accordance with Article 121(2) TFEU and Article 148(4) TFEU and in the European Semester falling within the scope of the ESF+ as set out in Article 4. This will be complemented by sufficient flexibility at managing authority level to identify priorities and areas for ESF+ investments in line with the specific local or regional challenges.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 535 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
The actions addressing the challenges identified in relevant country-specific recommendations (CSRs) and in the European Semester as referred to in Article 7(2) shall be programmed under one or more dedicated priorities. Sufficient flexibility shall be ensured at managing authority level to identify priorities and areas for ESF+ investments in line with the specific local or regional challenges, due to annual character of CSRs and multiannual character of the ESF+ programming.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 541 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11a Integrated territorial development 1. The ESF+ may support integrated territorial development within programmes under both goals referred to in Article 4(2) of Regulation(EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR] in accordance with Chapter II of Title III of that Regulation[new CPR]. 2. Member States shall implement integrated territorial development, supported by the ESF+, exclusively through the forms referred to in Article [22] of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxxx [new CPR].
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 554 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may support the upscaling of innovative approaches tested on a small-scale (social innovation and social experimentations) developed under the Employment and Social Innovation strand and other Union programmes.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 555 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Innovative actions and approaches may be programmed under any of the specific objectives set out in points (i) to (x) of Article 4(1).
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 558 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. Each Member State shall dedicate at least one priority to the implementation of paragraphs 1 or 2 or to both. The maximum co-financing rate for these priorities may be increased to 95% for the allocation of maximum 5% of the national ESF+ allocation under shared management to such priorities. The implementing and audit rules for such actions shall be sufficiently flexible to allow risk-taking and creativity.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 593 #

2018/0206(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. The delivery of food and/or material assistance mayshall be complemented with re-orientation towards competent services and other accompanying measures aiming at the social inclusion of the most deprived persons.
2018/09/26
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
The EGF is an emergency fund which will operate reactively and shall contribute to a better distribution of the benefits of globalisation and technological advance by helping displaced workers adapt to structural change. As such, the EGF shall contribute to the implementation of the principles defined under the European Pillar of Social Rights and enhance social and economic cohesion among regions and Member States.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the cessation of activity of more than 2500 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of four months, in an enterprise in a Member State, including where that cessation applies in its suppliers or downstream producers;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the cessation of activity of more than 2500 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of six months, particularly in SMEs, where all operate in the same or different economic sector defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in one region or two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level or in more than two contiguous regions defined at NUTS 2 level provided that there are more than 250 workers or self-employed persons affected in two of the regions combined;
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the cessation of activity of more than 250 displaced workers or self- employed persons, over a reference period of four months, particularly in SMEs, operating in the same or different economic sectors defined at NACE Revision 2 division level and located in the same region defined at NUTS 2 level.deleted
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. In small labour markets or in exceptional circumstances, in particular with regard to applications involving SMEs, where duly substantiated by the applicant Member State, an application for a financial contribution under this Article may be considered admissible even if the criteria laid down in points (a), (b) or (cb) of paragraph 1 are not entirely met, when the redundancies have a serious impact on employment and the local or regional economy. The applicant Member State shall specify which of the intervention criteria set out in points (a), (b) or (cb) of paragraph 1 are not entirely met. The aggregated amount of contributions in exceptional circumstances may not exceed 15 % of the annual ceiling of the EGF.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
By way of derogation from Article 5, applicant Member States may provide personalised services co-financed by the EGF to up to a number of NEETs under the age of 25, or where Member States so decide under the age of 30, on the date of submission of the application, equal to the number of targeted beneficiaries, as a priority to persons made redundant or whose activity has ceased, provided that at least some of the redundancies within the meaning of Article 4 occur in NUTS 2 level regions. The support may be rendered to NEETs under the age of 25, or where Member States so decide under the age of 30, in those NUTS 2 level regions.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The dissemination of skills required in the digital industrial age is a mandatory horizontal element of any package of personalised services offered. The level of training shall be adapted to the qualifications, skills and the needs of the respective beneficiary.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. On the basis of the information provided by the Member State, the Commission shall complete its assessment of the application’s compliance with the conditions for providing a financial contribution, within 630 working days of the receipt of the complete application or, where applicable, of the translation of the application. Where the Commission is unable, exceptionally, to comply with that deadline, it shall provide a written explanation setting out the reasons for the delay.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2018/0202(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. The Member State shall carry out the eligible measures set out in Article 8 as soon as possible, andwhich means that the measures will be implemented from at the latest 6 months after the date of entry into force of the decision on the financial contribution and carried out at the latest within 24 months after the date of entry into force of the decision on the financial contribution.
2018/09/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2018/0076(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) In order to facilitate the functioning of the Single Market and end the barriers between payment service users in the euro area and non-euro area Member States in respect of all cross-border payments in euro, it is necessary to ensure that charges for cross- border payments in euroany currency of the Union taking place within the Union are progressively aligned with charges for domestic payments made in the official currency of athe Member State in which the payment service provider provides its services to the payment service user.
2018/09/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 45 #

2018/0076(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Considering the technical level of the measures required for transparency in currency conversion charges, the Commission should be empowered to adopt regulatory technical standards developed by the European Banking Authority with regard to the level of transparency required and the comparability of currency conversion services. The Commission should adopt those draft regulatory technical standards by means of delegated acts pursuant to Article 290 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council13 . _________________ 13 Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12).deleted
2018/09/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #

2018/0076(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In order to limit consumer detriment before market players are required to comply with the transparency measures, it is appropriate to instruct the European Banking Authority (‘EBA’) to define within the regulatory technical standard the level of a transitional cap that should be applied to limit charges for currency conversion services while at the same time maintaining fair competition among payment service providers.deleted
2018/09/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 62 #

2018/0076(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 924/2009
Article 1– paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules on cross-border payments and transparency of currency conversion charges within the Union”,.
2018/09/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 67 #

2018/0076(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 924/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Charges levied by a payment service provider on a payment service user in respect of cross-border payments in euro shall be the same as the charges levied by that payment service provider on payment service users for corresponding national payments of the same value and in the official currency of the payment service user’s Member State.”Member State in which the payment service provider provides its services to the payment service user.",
2018/09/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 72 #

2018/0076(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 924/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1 –a (new)
(aa) Paragraph 1 -a is inserted: 1 -a. From [two years after the entry into force of this amending Regulation], charges levied by a payment service provider on a payment service user in respect of cross-border payments in any currency of the Union shall be the same as the charges levied by that payment service provider on payment service users for corresponding national payments of the same value and in the official currency of the Member State in which the payment service provider provides its service to the payment service user.
2018/09/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 88 #

2018/0076(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 924/2009
Article 3 a – paragraph 2
2. The European Banking Authority (‘EBA’) shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying how payment service providers shall ensure transparency and price comparability of different currency conversion service options, where those are available, to payment service users. Those standards shall include measures to be applied by payment service providers, including at an ATM or point of sale, to ensure that payment service users are informed about the costs of the currency conversion service and the alternative currency conversion options, where available, before the payment is initiated. The draft regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph shall also set the maximum amount of all charges allowed for the currency conversion services that can be applied to a payment transaction during the transitional period referred to in Article 3b. Those standards shall take into account the amount of the payment transaction and the fluctuation in exchange rates between currencies of Union Member States, while securing and maintaining fair competition among all payment service providers The regulatory technical standards shall specify the measures to be applied in order to prevent payment service users being charged more than this maximum amount during that period. EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by [6 months after entry into force of this Regulation] Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council*. __________________________________ _______________________________ * Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12).deleted
2018/09/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 105 #

2018/0076(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 924/2009
Article 3 b (new)
(4) the following Article 3b is inserted: ‘Article 3b Transitional period During the transitional period between the entry into force of the regulatory technical standards referred to in the fourth subparagraph of Article 3a(2) and the date of application of Article 3a(1), the charges for currency conversion services shall not exceed the maximum amount set in the regulatory technical standards adopted in accordance with the fourth subparagraph of Article 3a(2);’deleted
2018/09/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 52 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a European Labour Authoritgency (text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland) (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a European Labour Authoritgency (text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland) ((This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.))
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A European Labour Authority (the ‘Authority’) should be established in order to help strengthen fairnesenforce rules and trust in the Single Market. To that effect, the Authority should support the Member States and the Commission in strengthening access to information for individuals and employers about their rights and obligations in cross- border labour mobility situations as well as access to relevant services, support compliance and cooperation between the Member States to ensure the effective application of the Union law in these areas, and mediate and facilitate a solution in case of cross-border disputes or labour market disruptions, where functioning structures for mediation are not yet in place at Union level.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A European Labour Authoritgency (the ‘Authoritgency’) should be established in order to help strengthen fairness and trust in the Single Market. To that effect, the Authoritgency should support the Member States and the Commission in strengthening access to information for individuals and employers about their rights and obligations in cross- border labour mobility situations and cross-border provision of services as well as access to relevant services, support compliance and cooperation between the Member States to ensure the effective application of the Union law in these areas, and mediate and facilitate a solution in case of cross- border disputes or labour market disruptions.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 77 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) A European Labour Authoritgency (the ‘Authoritgency’) should be established in order to help strengthen fairness and trust in the Single Market. To that effect, the Authoritgency should support the Member States and the Commission in strengthening access to information for individuals and employers about their rights and obligations in cross- border labour mobility situations and cross-border provision of services as well as access to relevant services, support compliance and cooperation between the Member States to ensure the effective application of the Union law in these areas, and mediate and facilitate a solution in case of cross- border disputes or labour market disruptions.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Authoritgency should perform its activities in the areas of cross-border labour mobility, cross-border provision of services and social security coordination, including free movement of workers, posting of workers and highly mobile services. It should also enhance cooperation between Member States in tackling undeclared work. In cases where the Authoritgency, in the course of the performance of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities, including in areas of Union law beyond its scope, such as violations of working conditions, health and safety rules, or the employment of illegally staying third- country nationals, it should be able to report them and cooperate on these matters with the Commission, competent Union bodies, and national authorities where appropriate.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 82 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The Authoritgency should contribute to facilitating the free movement of workers governed by Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council40 and Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council41 . It should facilitate the posting of workers governed by Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and the Council42 and Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and the Council43 , including by supporting the enforcement of those provisions implemented through universally applicable collective agreements in line with the practices of Member Statesnational law. It should also help the coordination of social security systems governed by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council44 , Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council45 , Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and the Council46 ; as well as Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/7147 and Council Regulation (EC) No 574/72.48 . _________________ 39 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1). 40 Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 8). 41 Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 April 2016 on a European network of employment services (EURES), workers’ access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 492/2011 and (EU) No 1296/2013 (OJ L 107, 22.04.2016, p. 1). 42 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1). 43 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.05.2014, p. 11). 44 Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p.1, corrigendum OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 1). 45 Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p. 1). 46 Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationality (OJ L 344, 29.12.2010, p. 1). 47 Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ L 149, 5.7.1971 p. 2). 48 Council Regulation (EC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons, and to their families moving within the Community (OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1).
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 92 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) For these purposes, the Authoritgency should cooperate withfacilitate coordination between other relevant Union initiatives and networks, in particular the European Network of Public Employment Services (PES)54 , the European Enterprise Network55 , the Border Focal Point56 and SOLVIT57 , as well as with relevant national services such as the bodies to promote equal treatment and to support Union workers and members of their family, designated by Member States under Directive 2014/54/EU, and national contact points designated under Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58 to provide information on healthcare. The Authoritgency should also explore synergies with the proposed European services e-card.59 , notably with regard to those cases in which Member States opt for the submission of declarations regarding posted workers through the e-card platform. The AuthoritThe Agency should replace the Commission in managing the European network of employment services (‘EURES’) European Coordination Office established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2016/589, including the definition of user needs and business requirements for the effectiveness of the EURES portal and related IT services, but excluding the IT provision, and the operation and development of the IT infrastructure, which will continue to be ensured by the Commission. _________________ 54 Decision No 573/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 32). 55 European Enterprise Network, https://een.ec.europa.eu/ 56 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions, COM(2017) 534. 57 Commission Recommendation of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (OJ L 249, 19.9.2011, p. 10). 58 Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45). 59 COM(2016) 824 final and COM(2016) 823 final.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 94 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Authoritgency should perform its activities in the areas of cross-border labour mobility, cross-border provision of services and social security coordination, including free movement of workers, posting of workers and highly mobile services. It should also enhance cooperation between Member States in tackling undeclared work. In cases where the Authoritgency, in the course of the performance of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities, including in areas of Union law beyond its scope, such as violations of working conditions, health and safety rules, or the employment of illegally staying third-country nationals, it should be able to report them and cooperate on these matters with the Commission, competent Union bodies, and national authorities where appropriate.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Authority should perform its activities in the areas of cross-border labour mobility and social security coordination, including free movement of workers, posting of workers and highly mobile services. It should also enhance cooperation between Member States in tackling undeclared work. In cases where the Authority, in the course of the performance of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities, including in areas of Union law beyond its scope, such as violations of working conditions, health and safety rules, or the employment of illegally staying third- country nationals, it should be able to report them and cooperate on these matters with the Commission, competent Union bodies, and national authorities where appropriate.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To increase Member States' capacity to tackle irregularities with a cross-border dimension in relation to Union law within its scope, the Authoritgency should support the national authorities in carrying out concerted and joint inspections, including by facilitating the implementation of the inspections in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 2014/67/EU. These should take place at the request of a Member State, Member States orand upon their agreement to the Authority's suggestion. The Authorit. The Agency should provide strategic, logistical, and technical support if needed to Member States participating in the concerted or joint inspections in full respect of confidentiality requirements. Inspections should be carried out in agreement with the Member States concerned and take place fully within the legal framework of national law of the Member States concernedon which territory the inspection is being carried out, which should follow up on the outcomes of the concerted and joint inspections according to that Member State's national law.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 109 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The Authoritgency should contribute to facilitating the free movement of workers governed by Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council39 , Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council40 and Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council41 . It should facilitate the posting of workers governed by Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and the Council42 and Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and the Council43 , including by supporting the enforcement of those provisions implemented through universally applicable collective agreements in line with the practices of Member Statesnational law. It should also help the coordination of social security systems governed by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council44 , Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council45 , Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and the Council46 ; as well as Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/7147 and Council Regulation (EC) No 574/7248 . __________________ 39 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1). 40 Directive 2014/54/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014 on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 8). 41 Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 April 2016 on a European network of employment services (EURES), workers’ access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 492/2011 and (EU) No 1296/2013 (OJ L 107, 22.04.2016, p. 1). 42 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1). 43 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.05.2014, p. 11). 44 Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p.1, corrigendum OJ L 200, 7.6.2004, p. 1). 45 Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p. 1). 46 Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationality (OJ L 344, 29.12.2010, p. 1). 47 Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ L 149, 5.7.1971 p. 2). 48 Council Regulation (EC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons, and to their families moving within the Community (OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1).
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The individuals covered by the activities of the Authoritgency should be persons who are subject to the Union law within the scope of this Regulation, including workers, self-employed persons, jobseekers, and economically non-active persons and employers; this should cover both Union citizens and third-country nationals who are legally resident in the Union, such as posted workers, EU Blue Card holders, intra-corporate transferees or long-term residents, as well as their family members.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the European Labour Authoritgency (‘the Authoritgency’).
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 136 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The Authoritgency shall assist Member States and the Commission in matters relating to cross-border labour mobility, cross-border provision of services and the coordination of social security systems within the Union.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 144 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The objective of the Authoritgency shall be to contribute to ensuring fair labour mobility and cross-border provision of services in the internal market. To this end, the Authoritgency shall:
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 152 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) For these purposes, the Authoritgency should cooperate withfacilitate coordination between other relevant Union initiatives and networks, in particular the European Network of Public Employment Services (PES)54 , the European Enterprise Network55 , the Border Focal Point56 and SOLVIT57 , as well as with relevant national services such as the bodies to promote equal treatment and to support Union workers and members of their family, designated by Member States under Directive 2014/54/EU, and national contact points designated under Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58 to provide information on healthcare. The Authoritgency should also explore synergies with the proposed European services e-card59 , notably with regard to those cases in which Member States opt for the submission of declarations regarding posted workers through the e-card platform. The AuthoritThe Agency should replace the Commission in managing the European network of employment services (‘EURES’) European Coordination Office established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2016/589, including the definition of user needs and business requirements for the effectiveness of the EURES portal and related IT services, but excluding the IT provision, and the operation and development of the IT infrastructure, which will continue to be ensured by the Commission. __________________ 54 Decision No 573/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 32). 55 European Enterprise Network, https://een.ec.europa.eu/ 56 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions, COM(2017) 534. 57 Commission Recommendation of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (OJ L 249, 19.9.2011, p. 10). 58 Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45). 59 COM(2016) 824 final and COM(2016) 823 final.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) For these purposes, the Authority should cooperate with other relevant Union initiatives and networks, in particular the European Network of Public Employment Services (PES)54 , the European Enterprise Network55 , the Border Focal Point56 and SOLVIT57 , as well as with relevant national services such as the bodies to promote equal treatment and to support Union workers and members of their family, designated by Member States under Directive 2014/54/EU, and national contact points designated under Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council58 to provide information on healthcare. Among other goals, such cooperation should prevent potential duplication of the activities of the Authority and activities of Union initiatives and networks. The Authority should also explore synergies with the proposed European services e-card59 , notably with regard to those cases in which Member States opt for the submission of declarations regarding posted workers through the e-card platform. The Authority should replace the Commission in managing the European network of employment services (‘EURES’) European Coordination Office established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2016/589, including the definition of user needs and business requirements for the effectiveness of the EURES portal and related IT services, but excluding the IT provision, and the operation and development of the IT infrastructure, which will continue to be ensured by the Commission. __________________ 54 Decision No 573/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 32). 55 European Enterprise Network, https://een.ec.europa.eu/ 56 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions, COM(2017) 534. 57 Commission Recommendation of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (OJ L 249, 19.9.2011, p. 10). 58 Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45). 59 COM(2016) 824 final and COM(2016) 823 final.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To increase Member States' capacity to tackle irregularities with a cross-border dimension in relation to Union law within its scope, the Authoritgency should support the national authorities in carrying out concerted and joint inspections, including by facilitating the implementation of the inspections in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 2014/67/EU. These should take place at the request of a Member State, Member States orand upon their agreement to the Authority's suggestion. The Authorit. The Agency should provide strategic, logistical, and technical support if needed to Member States participating in the concerted or joint inspections in full respect of confidentiality requirements. Inspections should be carried out in agreement with the Member States concerned and take place fully within the legal framework of national law of the Member States concerned which territory the inspection is being carried out, which should follow up on the outcomes of the concerted and joint inspections according to that Member State's national law.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) provide relevant information on the rights and obligations of individuals in cross-border labour mobility situations; and cross-border provision of services
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 207 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) facilitate the follow-up to requests and information exchanges between national authorities by providing logistical and technical support, including translation and interpretation services, and through exchanges on the status of cases; if requested by concerned Member States
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 212 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) facilitate cross-border enforcement procedures of penalties and fines; if requested by concerned Member States
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 215 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The Authority should directly rely on the expertise of relevant stakeholders in the areas under its scope through a dedicated Stakeholder Group. The members should be representatives of Union-level and sectorial social partners. In carrying out its activities, the Stakeholder Group will take due account of the opinions and draw on the expertise of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems established by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and the Advisory Committee on the Free Movement of Workers established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 492/2011.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 223 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of one or several Member States, the Authoritgency shall coordinate concerted or joint inspections in the areas under the scope of the Authoritgency’s competences. The request may be submitted by one or several Member States. The Authoritgency may also suggest to the authorities of the Member States concerned that they perform a concerted or joint inspection. Member States take part in the concerned or joint inspection only after their agreement
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 226 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may decide not to take part in a concerned or joint inspection. Where the authority of a Member State decides not to participate in or carry out the concerted or joint inspection referred to in paragraph 1, it shall inform the Authoritgency in writing of the reasons for its decision duly in advancebefore the beginning of the planned inspection. In such cases, the Authoritgency shall inform the other national authorities concerned.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 227 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Within the framework of their respective competences, the Authority should cooperate with other agencies of the Union, in particular those established in the area of employment and social policy, building on their expertise and maximising synergies: the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound), the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU- OSHA), and the European Training Foundation (ETF), as well as, as regards the fight against organised crime and trafficking in human beings, with the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust). Among other goals, such cooperation should prevent potential duplication between the activities of the Authority and activities of other Union agencies.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The organisation of a concerted or joint inspection shall be subject to the prior agreement of all participating Member States before the beginning of such an inspection via their National Liaison Officers. In the event that one or more Member States refuse to take part in the concerted or joint inspection, the other national authorities may, where appropriate, only carry out the envisaged concerted or joint inspection in the participating Member States. The Member States that declined to participate in the inspection shall keep information about the envisaged inspection confidential.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 233 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. An agreement for setting up a joint 1. inspection ('the joint inspection agreement') between the participating Member States and the Authoritgency shall set out the conditions for carrying out such an exercise, especially the scope of the inspection and the applicable law. The joint inspection agreement may include provisions which enable joint inspections, once agreed and planned, to take place at short notice. The Authoritgency shall establish a model agreement. after consulting all Member States
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 235 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Concerted and joint inspections and their follow-up shall be carried out in accordance with the national law of the Member States concerned where the inspection is taking place. Inspections are being carried out under the supervision of the national relevant authority of the Member State where the inspection is taking place.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 237 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) The Authority should complement the activities of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems created by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (‘the Administrative Commission’) in so far as it exercises regulatory tasks related to the application of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009. The Authority should however take over operational tasks currently carried out under the framework of the Administrative Commission, such as providing a mediation function between Member States, ensuring a forum for handling financial matters related to the application of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009, replacing the function of the Audit Board set up by those Regulations, as well as matters related to electronic data exchange and IT tools to facilitate the application of those Regulations, replacing the function of the Technical Commission for Data Processing set up by those Regulations.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 237 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The Authoritgency shall provide logistical and technical support if requested by the Member States concerned, which may include translation and interpretation services, to Member States carrying out concerted or joint inspections.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 240 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Under no circumstances shall the Agency have the competences to impose fines or sanctions, which fall under exclusive competences of the Member States. The Agency may coordinate and support the cross-border enforcement of administrative penalties and/or fines as provided for in Chapter VI of the Directive 2014/67/EU.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 243 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Parties being subject of the inspection shall receive the post- inspection report and shall have the right to refer to it and challenge findings following national law of the Member State, on which territory the inspection has been carried out.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 265 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The Authoritgency shall assist Member States and the Commission in matters relating to cross-border labour mobility, cross-border provision of services and the coordination of social security systems within the Union.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. In the event of disputes between Member States regarding the application or interpretation of Union law in areas covered by this Regulation, the Authority may perform a mediation role, without prejudice to the procedures envisaged by the decision No A1 of 12 June 2009 concerning the establishment of a dialogue and conciliation procedure concerning the validity of documents, the determination of the applicable legislation and the provision of benefits under Regulation No 883/2004 of the European parliament and the Council.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 285 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The objective of the Authoritgency shall be to contribute to ensuring fair labour mobility and cross-border provision of services in the internal market. To this end, the Authority shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 289 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to ensuring fairenforcement of labour mobility rules in the internal market. To this end, the Authority shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Management Board shall elect a Chairperson and a Deputy Chairperson from among the members with voting rights, and shall strive for gender and geographical balance. The Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be elected by a majority of two-thirds of the members of the Management Board with voting rights.
2018/09/11
Committee: JURI
Amendment 396 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Authoritgency shall improve the availability, quality, reliability and accessibility of information offered to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 589/2016 on EURES and Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]. To that end, the Authoritgency shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 397 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Authority shall improve the availability, quality, comprehensibility and accessibility of information offered to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 589/2016 on EURES and Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256]. To that end, the Authority shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 403 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) provide relevant information on the rights and obligations of individuals in cross-border labour mobility situations and cross-border provision of services;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 424 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) support Member States in complying with the obligations on the dissemination of and access to information relating to the free movement of workers as laid down in Article 6 of Directive 2014/54/EU, and to the posting of workers as laid down in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU and in Article 1(2) of Directive 2018/957/EU, especially providing support with the proper functioning of single official national websites;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 427 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) support Member States in complying with the obligations on the dissemination of and access to information relating to the free movement of workers as laid down in Article 6 of Directive 2014/54/EU, and to the posting of workers as laid down in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU; especially support with the proper functioning of single official national websites;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 429 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) support Member States in improving the accuracy, completeness, comprehensibility and user-friendliness of relevant national information services, in accordance with the quality criteria laid down in Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256], by providing Member States with relevant feedback;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 430 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) support Member States in improving the accuracy, completeness and user-friendliness of relevant national information services and sources, in accordance with the quality criteria laid down in Regulation [Single Digital Gateway – COM(2017)256];
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 444 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Authority shall provide free of charge services to individuals and employers to facilitate labour mobility across the Union. To that end, the Authority shall:
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 453 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) cooperate with other Union initiatives and networks, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, the European Enterprise Network and the Border Focal Point, in particular to identify and overcome cross-border obstacles to labour mobility; and cross- border provision of services;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 476 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) facilitate the follow-up to requests and information exchanges between national authorities by providing logistical and technical support, including translation and interpretation services, and through exchanges on the status of cases if requested by concerned Member States;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 494 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) facilitate cross-border enforcement procedures of penalties and fines, while respecting the national legal framework for both court and administrative procedures;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 497 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) facilitate cross-border enforcement procedures of penalties and fines if requested by concerned Member States;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 548 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of one or several Member States, the Authoritgency shall coordinate concerted or joint inspections in the areas under the scope of the Authoritgency’s competences. The request may be submitted by one or several Member States. The Authority may also suggest to the authorities of the Member States concerned that they perform a concerted or joint inspection. Member States take part in the concerned or joint inspection only after their agreement.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 558 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may decide not to take part in a concerned or joint inspection. Where the authority of a Member State decides not to participate in or carry out the concerted or joint inspection referred to paragraph 1, it shall inform the Authoritgency in writing of the reasons for its decision duly in advancebefore the beginning of the planned inspection. In such cases, the Authoritgency shall inform the other national authorities concerned.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 575 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The organisation of a concerted or joint inspection shall be subject to the prior agreement of all participating Member States before the beginning of the inspection via their National Liaison Officers. In the event that one or more Member States refuse to take part in the concerted or joint inspection, the other national authorities may, where appropriate, only carry out the envisaged concerted or joint inspection in the participating Member States. The Member States that declined to participate in the inspection shall keep information about the envisaged inspection confidential.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 576 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The organisation of a concerted or joint inspection shall be subject to the prior agreement of all participating Member States before the beginning of such an inspection via their National Liaison Officers. In the event that one or more Member States refuse to take part in the concerted or joint inspection, the other national authorities may, where appropriate, only carry out the envisaged concerted or joint inspection in the participating Member States. The Member States that declined to participate in the inspection shall keep information about the envisaged inspection confidential.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 589 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. An agreement for setting up a joint inspection ('the joint inspection agreement') between the participating Member States and the Authoritgency shall set out the conditions for carrying out such an exercise, especially the scope of the inspection and the applicable law. The joint inspection agreement may include provisions which enable joint inspections, once agreed and planned, to take place at short notice. The Authoritgency shall establish a model agreement after consulting all Member States.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 599 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Concerted and joint inspections and their follow-up shall be carried out in accordance with the national law of the Member States concerned where the inspection is taking place. Inspections are being carried out under the supervision of the national relevant authority of the Member State where the inspection is taking place.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 609 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The Authoritgency shall provide logistical and technical support if requested by the Member States concerned, which may include translation and interpretation services, to Member States carrying out concerted or joint inspections.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 612 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Concerted and joint inspections shall on the territory of each Member State exclusively produce legal effects envisaged by law of the respective Member State.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 632 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Parties being subject of the inspection shall receive the post- inspection report and shall have the right to refer to it and challenge findings in accordance with national law of the Member State, on which territory the inspection has been carried out.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 640 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Joint inspections as well as their legal consequences, decisions on administrative fines and penalties as well as rights and obligations of the parties being subject of the inspection shall be with no prejudice to the law applicable on the territory of a Member State where the inspection is taking place.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 648 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 7
7. In the event that the Authority, in the course of concerted or joint inspections, or in the course of any of its activities, becomes aware of suspected irregularities in the application of Union law, including beyond the scope of its competences, it shall report those suspected irregularities to the Commission and authorities in the Member State concerned, where appropriate.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 661 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Authority shallgency shall, in cooperation with Member States, assess risks and carry out analyses regarding cross-border labour flows, such as labour market imbalances, sector-specific threats and recurring problems encountered by individuals and employers in relation to cross-border mobility and cross-border provision of services. For that purpose, the Authoritgency shall ensure complementarity with, and draw on the expertise of, other Union agencies or services, including in the areas of skills forecasting and health and safety at work. Upon a request by the Commission or a Member State, the Authority may carry out focused in-depth analyses and studies to investigate specific labour mobility issues.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 672 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) identify, analyse and take appropriate measures towards any national provisions which are not proportionate, justified or non- discriminatory as well as any barriers towards cross-border labour mobility and cross-border provision of services;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 685 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) develop non-binding common guidelines for use by Member States, including guidance for inspections in cases with a cross-border dimension, as well as shared definitions and common concepts, building on relevant work at the Union level;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 688 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) develop common guidelines for optional use by Member States, including guidance for inspections in cases with a cross-border dimension, as well as shared definitions and common concepts, building on relevant work at the Union level;
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 706 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. In the event of disputes between Member States regarding the application or interpretation of Union law in areas covered by this Regulation, the Authority may perform a mediation role, without prejudice to the procedures envisaged by the decision No A1 of 12 June 2009 concerning the establishment of a dialogue and conciliation procedure concerning the validity of documents, the determination of the applicable legislation and the provision of benefits under Regulation No 883/2004 of the European parliament and the Council.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 723 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Upon request of one of the Member States concerned by a dispute, the Authoritgency shall launch a mediation procedure before its Mediation Board set up for this purpose in accordance with Article 17(2). The Authoritgency may also launch a mediation procedure on its own initiative before the Mediation Board, including on the basis of a referral from SOLVIT, subject to the agreement of all Member States concerned by that dispute. Member States concerned take actively part in the mentioned procedure and make at disposal any relevant and/or requested information. The parties being subject of the mediation such as employers, employees, self- employed persons shall also be consulted and involved.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 791 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Authority may set up working groups or expert panels with representatives from Member States and/or from the Commission, or external experts following selection procedures, for the fulfilment of its specific tasks or for specific policy areas, including a Mediation Board in order to fulfil its tasks in accordance with Article 13 of this Regulation, and a dedicated group for the purpose of handling financial matters related to the application of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009, as referred to in Article 8(2) of this Regulation. All Member States shall be entitled to appoint representatives to all working groups or expert panels.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 847 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Management Board shall elect a Chairperson and a Deputy Chairperson from among the members with voting rights, and shall strive for gender and geographical balance. The Chairperson and the Deputy Chairperson shall be elected by a majority of two-thirds of the members of the Management Board with voting rights.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 928 #

2018/0064(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. No later than fivthree years after the date referred to in Article 51, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall assess the Authority's performance in relation to its objectives, mandate and tasks. The evaluation shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify the mandate of the Authority, and the financial implications of any such modification, including by further synergies and streamlining with Agencies active in the area of employment and social policy.
2018/07/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas women's economic empowerment and equal opportunities in the labour market are crucial for women individually but also instrumental for EU's economic growth with positive impact on GDP, inclusiveness and competitiveness of businesses as well as challenges related to the ageing population in the EU
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas gender equality policies have a strong impact on GDP and by 2050, improving gender equality would lead to an increase in EU GDP per capita by 6.1 to 9.6%, which amounts to €1.95 to €3.15 trillion (EIGE's estimates)
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that equal opportunities for economic independence and the guaranteeimplementation of the principle of equal pay for male and female workers for equal work andor work of equal value applied by the Member States as defined in the article 157 of TFEU are necessary steps for women's economic empowerment;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to promote the well-being of women, by tackling the pay and pension gaps and combating atypical and insecurethe abuse of atypical forms of work and employment, such as temporaryhe use of contracts or involuntary part-time workwhich do not correspond to the nature and frequency of the work performed in accordance with the national law;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses that preventing and eliminating the gender pension gap and reducing women's poverty in the old age first and foremost depend on creating conditions for women to make equal pension contributions through further inclusion into the labour market and safeguarding equal opportunities in terms of pay, career advancement and possibilities to work full-time;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. points out that digitalisation has a profound impact on the labour market by changing value chains, conditions and nature of work as well as creating new job opportunities and more flexible working patterns; notes that opportunities for flexible and teleworking arrangements brought about by digitalisation may serve as a an effective tool for further inclusion of women into the labour market as well as better reconciliation of professional and domestic duties for both women and men;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. highlights that improving digital skills and IT-literacy among women and boosting inclusion into the ICT, which is one of the highest paying sectors, could contribute to their economic empowerment and independence resulting in the reduction of the total gender wage gap;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Points out that the demand for digital technology professionals in the EU has grown by 4% annually in the last ten years and the number of unfilled vacancies for ICT professionals is expected to double by 2020; calls therefore on the Member States and the Commission to advance their efforts to promote digital skills and e-literacy among women and girls, who remain underrepresented in this sector, from the earliest stages at school and going through the whole educational cycle as well as in the framework of life-long learning;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3 d. Encourages Member States to introduce age appropriate ICT education at early stages with a particular focus on inspiring and supporting girls to pursue their interest and talents in the digital field and safeguarding them from constraining and negative stereotyping which discourage girls from advancing their e-skills;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls Recognises that domestic work and provision of household services, which are largely feminised, are often perfor measures to guarantee the economic and social dignity of feminised work, such as domestic workd as undeclared work; calls on the Member States to promote and further develop the formal sector of domestic services through facilitation and incentives to employ domestic workers with the aim of reducing the undeclared work and improving reconciliation of private and professional life for the working families;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on policy makers, also through the European Platform Tackling Undeclared Work, to recognise household services, family employment and home- care as a valuable economic sector which needs to be better regulated within the Member States with a view to create both secure position for domestic workers and provide families with a capacity to assume their role as employers;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to enforce laws and workplace policies that prohibitsure proper application of the existing equal treatment legislation in order to eliminate gender-based discrimination in the recruitment, retention and promotion of women in employment in both the public and private sectors and at work in both the public and private sectors and to offer women a level-playing field in terms of pay and career advancement;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. RecallHighlights the importance of the Women on Boards Directive and calls on the Member States to ensure equal representation and leadership equal representation of women and men in decision-making position in both the public and private sector; recalls the importance of the Women on Boards Directive which aims at balancing the labour market, in economic andshare of the under-represented sex in non-executive board-member polsitical decision-making structures and institutions, as well as in enterprises and on corporate boardons in publicly listed companies, with the exception of small and medium enterprises;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States to strengthen and enforce the full exercise of the right of collective bargaining in the private and public sectorssocial partners to use collective bargaining to advance equal opportunities for women and men, to ensure that the existing equal treatment legislation is applied in practice as well as to address and combat the gender pay gap;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to implement and enforce public social care policies as well as to provide quality childcare fafurther develop care facilities for the dependent, including children and elderly, with the view of enhancing reconciliaties and promote the equal sharing of unpaid domestic work and co- responsibility in care.on of private and professional life for the working families and increasing women's participation in the labour market as a precondition for women's economic empowerment;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2017/2008(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Encourages the Member States based on the provisions of the Public Procurement Directive (2014/24/EU) to promote the use of social clauses in public procurement as a tool for enhancing equality between women and men where relevant national legislations exists and can act as a ground for social clauses;
2017/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas the collaborative economy offers many opportunities for growth and jobs, especially for people who are distant from the labour market, such as young people, students, women and seniors, and provides innovative new services for citizens and consumers;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the Commission communication entitled ‘A European Agenda for the collaborative economy’ stresses the increasing significance of the platform economy, its important contribution to growth and jobs by providing new opportunities for citizens and innovative entrepreneurs, and its impact on economic and employment policies;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas with the Communication on a European agenda for the collaborative economy, the EU provides welcomed guidelines on applicable EU rules and recommendations to help citizens, businesses and EU countries to fully benefit from these new business models and promote a balanced and fair development of the collaborative economy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the Commission communication on collaborative economy is a starting point of the EU contribution to a balanced and fair development of the collaborative economy, given the rapid evolution of this economy and its related regulatory loopholes and uncertainties that still must be clarified;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the European Commission and the Member States need to address more deeply the social dimension of the collaborative economy by providing in depth analysis and data on new forms of employment, by monitoring the evolving regulatory environment and by encouraging the exchange of good practices among EU countries, in order to overcome the social challenges related to this new economy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need for a clear distinction between ‘professional’ and ‘non-professional’ platforms and to recognise activities in the platform economy that are properly categorised as ‘work’platforms with a lucrative business model and those based on the sharing of costs, resources or skills, in order to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses and citizens; in parallel, calls for a clear distinction between non-professional peer-to-peer activity and service providers acting in their professional capacity by further developing sector specific criteria and thresholds, in collaboration with relevant stakeholders; amongst service providers, underlines the need to distinguish employees and self-employed, in order to apply them rights and duties accordingly;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. States that all workers in the platform economy are either employed or self-employed based on the primacy of facts; recalls in this context that, for the purpose of applying EU law, the Court of Justice has defined the concept of ‘worker’ on the basis of an employment relationship characterised by certain criteria such as subordination, remuneration and the nature of workthe existence of a subordination link, the presence of a remuneration and the nature of work, even so EU Member States are responsible for deciding who is to be considered a worker in their national legal order; calls also to clarify self- employment in order to prevent bogus self-employment and to ensure the rights of self-employed workers;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls foron the European Commission, in cooperation with Member States and social partners, to carefully evaluate the influence of the collaborative economy on the forms of employment and working conditions and consider taking necessary actions such as a framework directive on working conditions in the platform economy in order to guarantee the legal situation of platform workers and to ensure that all platform workers have the samadequate social and employment rights ands well as health and safety protection as workers in the traditionalcomparable to other forms of employment taking into account specificities of the collaborative economy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Takes note of the multiplication of national and local regulatory initiatives affecting the collaborative economy; Stresses the importance of rapid clarification at European level of the applicable rules in order to limit the fragmentation of the internal market;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for more reliable data on joband evidence on jobs, skills and working conditions in the platform economy and, if necessary, for the adjustment of related policies to create a level playing field between the platforms and traditional economiebusinesses, especially SMEs, in particular in the field of consumer protection, taxation and working conditions;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Underlines that the collaborative economy fosters entrepreneurship; Stresses the need to adapt training mechanisms to this new kind of businesses;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls on the national public employment services and the EURES Network to communicate better on the opportunities offered by the collaborative economy;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the European Commission and the Member States to reflect on the appropriate means to ensure that digital platforms inform providers on the regulatory framework that has to be complied with, when offering services, as individuals using platforms are sometimes not even aware of the requirements they should fulfil; considers that digital platforms should play a more proactive role in checking whether the service provider fulfils its legal requirements; Calls on Member States to operate specific controls in order to check if operators stick to the rules, especially in terms of taxation, consumer protection, working conditions and skills requirements;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Emphasizes that the economic model of collaborative economy is based on users' trust, particularly in online comments; calls in this context on the European Commission to propose tools for certification of online consumer opinions in order to allow users to have reliable and fair information on the quality of the services offered on collaborative platforms;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that constant accessibility represnectivity can help for a better work life balance by facilitating working time arrangements; a serious health and safety risk in the platform economy; advocates the establishment of a ‘right to log off’.cknowledges however the need to assess the effects of collaborative economy on health and safety at work and to adapt accordingly the existing health and safety framework;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2017/2003(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Highlights that the collaborative economy has flourished mainly so far in urban areas; Stresses therefore the importance of deploying broadband in rural areas in order to enable all EU territories to benefit from the potential of the collaborative economy, especially in terms of employment; Calls for Member States to strengthen financial and human resources to enable people from rural areas to acquire basic digital skills;
2017/02/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas skills have a strategic importance for employability, growth, innovation and social cohesion and the complexity of jobs is increasing across all sectors and occupations and there is inflation in relative skills demand, even for low-skilled jobs;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 43 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas skills mismatches is a worrying phenomenon affecting individuals and businesses, creating skill gaps and skill shortages and is one of the causes of unemployment17 ; whereas 26% of EU adult employees lack the skills they need for their job; _________________ 17 http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/events- and-projects/projects/assisting-eu- countries-skills-matching
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 58 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas equality between women and men is a fundamental principle of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties and is one of the objectives and responsibilities of the Union; whereas, furthermore, mainstreaming the principle of equality between women and men in all its activities, such as access to education and training, is a specific mission of the Union;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 95 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
L a. whereas according to some studies only 5% of professions may disappear due to full automatisation and whereas the majority of professions will need new skills in order to profit from automatisation and maximise productivity;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 122 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees with the focus on the need to upgrade the European education and training systems in line with the fast changing economic and societ, societal and technological environment; notes that, while skills needs are dynamic, the main focus of the skills package is the immediate needs of the labour market; highlights in this respect the importance of a pan- European skills needs forecasting tool and lifelong learning with a view to adapting to new situations in the labour market;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 188 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Underlines that there is a need to develop complex education and training systems to provide learners with different types of skills: basic skills (literacy, numeracy and digital skills); advanced generic skills (such as problem solving, learning etc.); professional, technical, occupation-specific or sector-specific skills as well as socio-emotional skills;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 194 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Underlines that understanding specific needs of low-skilled adults and providing them with tailor-made training is an essential step in designing more effective training programmes; reminds that responsiveness and adaptability in light of gathered experience and changing circumstances are crucial elements of an effective education process;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 227 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Asks for concrete measures to be put in place in order to facilitate the transition of young people from education to work by ensuring quality internships and apprenticeships, providing them with practical on-the-spot training, giving young people the possibility of putting their talents into practice and have a set of rights and access to social protection;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 353 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Underlines the importance of investing in teachers and equipping them with new skills and teaching techniques in line with technological and societal developments; underlines the role of teachers as mentors, who should be able to teach students and future employees how to look for reliable information, how to analyze it and use it for specific purpose;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 512 #

2017/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41 a. Calls on the Commission to organise once a year an "European Skills Forum" to enable relevant authorities, education institutions, practitioners, students, employers and employees to exchange best practice on skills forecast, development and validation;
2017/04/12
Committee: EMPLCULT
Amendment 78 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Principle 7 of the European Pillar of Social Rights, proclaimed at Gothenburg on 17 November 2017, provides that workers have the right to be informed in writing at the start of employment about their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship, including any probationary period, and that they have the right to access to effective and impartial dispute resolution and, in case of unjustified dismissal, a right to redress, including adequate compensation. Principle 5 provides that regardless of the type and duration of the employment relationship, workers have the right to fair and equal treatment regarding working conditions, access to social protection and training, that employment relationships that lead to precarious working conditions is to be prevented, including by prohibiting abuse of atypical contracts, that any probationary period should be of reasonable duration and that the transition towards open-ended forms of employment is to be fostered. Principle 5 also provides that necessary flexibility for employers to adapt swiftly to changes in the economic context must be ensured. Accordingly, rules applicable to non-standard forms of employment must strike a balance between the need to maintain flexibility in order to foster labour market development, and the entitlement of all workers to social protection.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Since the adoption of Council Directive 91/533/EEC,33 labour markets have undergone far-reaching changes due to demographic developments and digitalisation leading to the creation of new forms of employment, which have supported job creation and labour market growth. New forms of employment are often not as regular or stable as traditional employment relationships and lead to reduced predictability for the workers concerned, creating uncertainty as to applicable rights and social protection. In this evolving world of work, there is therefore an increased need for workers to be fully informed about their essential working conditions, which should occur in a written form and in a timely manner. In order adequately to frame the development of new forms of employment, workers in the Union should also be provided with a number of new minimum rights aimed at promoting security and predictability in employment relationships while achieving upward convergence across Member States and preserving labour market adaptability. It must be recognized that flexible forms of employment also have a positive impact on the labour market and workers, as they foster innovation and facilitate access to the labour market to individuals who are not apt to work in a standard form of employment. __________________ 33 Council Directive 91/533/EC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p. 32).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure effectiveness of the rights provided by the Union law, the personal scope of Directive 91/533/EEC should be updated. In its case law, the Court of Justice of the European Union has established criteria for determining the status of a worker34 which are appropriate for determining the personal scope of application of this Directive. The definition of worker in Article 2(1) is based on these criteria. They ensure a uniform implementation of the personal scope of the Directive while leaving it to national authorities and courts to apply it to specific situations. Provided that they fulfil those criteria, domestic workers, on- demand workers, intermittent workers, voucher based-workers, platform workers, trainees and apprentices could come within scope of this Directive. __________________ 34 Judgments of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85; 14 October 2010, Union Syndicale Solidaires Isère, Case C-428/09; 9 July 2015, Balkaya, Case C-229/14; 4 December 2014, FNV Kunsten, Case C-413/13; and 17 November 2016, Ruhrlandklinik, Case C- 216/15.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure effectiveness of the rights provided by the Union law, the personal scope of Directive 91/533/EEC should be updated. In its case law, the Court of Justice of the European Union has established criteria for determining the status of a worker34 which are appropriate for determining the personal scope of application of this Directive. The definition of worker in Article 2(1) is based on these criteria. They ensure a uniform implementation of the personal scope of the Directive while leaving it to national authorities and courts to apply it to specific situations. Provided that they fulfil those criteria, domestic workers, on- demand workers, intermittent workers, voucher based-workers, platform workers, trainees and apprentices could come within scope of this Directive. __________________ 34 Judgments of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85; 14 October 2010, Union Syndicale Solidaires Isère, Case C-428/09; 9 July 2015, Balkaya, Case C-229/14; 4 December 2014, FNV Kunsten, Case C-413/13; and 17 November 2016, Ruhrlandklinik, Case C- 216/15.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Workers should have the right to be informed about their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship in writing at the start of employment. The relevant information should therefore reach them at the latest on the first day7 days after the start of the employment.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Workers posted or sent abroad should receive additional information specific to their situation. For successive work assignments in several Member States or third countries, such as in international road transport, that information may be grouped for several assignments before the first departure and subsequently modified in case of change. Where they qualify as posted workers under Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council,38 or other sector specific regulations they should also be notified of the single national website developed by the host Member State where they will find the relevant information on the working conditions applying to their situation. Unless Member Statesthe law of the Member State governing the employment relationship provides otherwise, these obligations apply if the duration of the work period abroad is more than four consecutive weeks. __________________ 38 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Employers should not prohibit workers from taking up employment with other employers, outside the time spent working for them, within the limits set out in Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.39 as well as within other sector specific legislation regulating working time. Incompatibility clauses, understood as a restriction on working for specific categories of employers, may be necessary for objective reasons, such as the protection of business secrets or the avoidance of conflicts of interests. __________________ 39 Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p. 9).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) Social partners may consider that in specific sectors or situations different provisions are more appropriate, for the pursuit of the purpose of this Directive, than the minimum standards set in Chapter Three of this Directive. Member States should therefore be able to allow social partners to conclude collective agreements modifying the provisions contained in that chapter, as long as the overall level of protection of workers is not lowered.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) The burden of proof that there has been no dismissal or equivalent detriment on the grounds that workers have exercised their rights provided for in this Directive, should fall on employers when workers establish, before a court or other competent authority, facts from which it may be presumed that they have been dismissed, or have been subject to measures with equivalent effect, on such grounds.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) The burden of proof that there has been no dismissal or equivalent detriment on the grounds that workers have exercised their rights provided for in this Directive, should fall on employers when workers establish, before a court or other competent authority, facts from which it may be presumed that they have been dismissed, or have been subject to measures with equivalent effect, on such grounds.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 383 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘worker’ means a natural person who for a certain period of time performs services fperforms work in accor dand under the direction of another person in return for remunece with national law and practionce;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 387 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘worker’ means a natural person who for a certain period of time performs services for and under the direction of another person in return for remunework in accordance with national law and practionce;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 392 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘employer’ means one or more natural or legal person(s) who is or are directly or indirectly party to an employment relationship with a worker;deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 401 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ‘employment relationship’ means the work relationship between workers and employers as defined abovby national law and practice;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 524 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The information referred to in Article 3(2) shall be provided individually to the worker in the form of a document at the latest on the first day of the employment relationship7 days from the start of employment. That document may be provided and transmitted electronically as long as it is easily accessiblethis is accepted by the worker and as long as it can be stored and printed.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 538 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall, in cooperation with social partners, develop templates and models for the document referred to in paragraph 1 and put them at the disposal of workers and employers including by making them available on a single official national website and by other suitable means. Such templates and models may be further adapted to sector specific needs.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 560 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that any change in the aspects of the employment relationship referred to in Article 3(2) and to the additional information for workers posted or sent abroad in Article 6 shall be provided in the form of a written document or electronically by the employer to the worker at the earliest opportunity and at the latest on the day7 days after it takes effect.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 574 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the country or countries in which the work abroad is to be performed and its anticipated duration;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 576 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) where applicable, the benefits in cash or kind attendant on the work assignment(s), which includes in the case of posted workers covered by Directive 96/71/EC any allowances specific to posting and any arrangements for reimbursing expenditure on travel, board and lodging;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 585 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the remuneration to which the worker is entitled in accordance with the applicable law of the host Member State according to the information provided on the single official national website pursuant to Article 5(2) of the Directive 2014/67/EU;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 593 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The information referred to in paragraph 1(b) and 2(a) may, where appropriate, be given in the form of a reference to thespecific provisions of laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisionacts or collective agreements governing those particular points, provided that such collective agreements are easily accessible for workers.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 603 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Unless the law of Member States which governs the employment contract provide otherwise, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply if the duration of each work period outside the Member State in which the worker habitually works is four consecutive weeks or less.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 643 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Employers may however lay down conditions of incompatibility where such restrictions are justified by legitimate reasons such as the protection of business secrets or the avoidance of conflicts of interests or any regulations concerning working time including sector specific solutions.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 675 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) Member States may, in cooperation with social partners, establish sector specific provisions if needed.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 706 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10
Transition to another form of employment 1. workers with at least six months' seniority with the same employer may request a form of employment with more predictable and secure working conditions where available. 2. written reply within one month of the request. With respect to natural persons acting as employers and micro, small, or medium enterprises, Member States may provide for that deadline to be extended to no more than three months and allow for an oral reply to a subsequent similar request submitted by the same worker if the justification for the reply as regards the situation of the worker remains unchanged.Article 10 deleted Member States shall ensure that The employer shall provide a
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 778 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that provisions contrary to this Directive in existing individual or collective agreements, internal rules of undertakings, or any other arrangements shall be declared null and void or are amended in order to bring them into line with the provisions of this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 780 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14
Legal presumption and early settlement Member States shall ensure that, where a worker has not received in due time all or part of the documents referred to in Article 4(1), Article 5, or Article 6, and the employer has failed to rectify that omission within 15 days of its notification, one of the following systems shall apply: (a) favourable presumptions defined by the Member State. Where the information provided did not include the information referred to in points (e), (f), (k) or (l) of Article 3(2), the favourable presumptions shall include a presumption that the worker has an open-ended employment relationship, that there is no probationary period or that the worker has a full-time position, respectively. Employers shall have the possibility to rebut the presumptions; or (b) possibility to submit a complaint to a competent authority in a timely manner. If the competent authorArticle 14 deleted mechanism the worker shall benefity finds that the complaint is justified, it shall order the relevant employer(s) to provide the missing information. If the employer does not provide the missing information within 15 days following receipt of the order, the authority shall be able to impose an appropriate administrative penalty, even if the employment relationship has ended. Employrom the workers shall have the possibility to lodge an administrative appeal against the decision imposing the penalty. Member States may designate existing bodies as competent authorities.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 827 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17
Protection from dismissal and burden of 1. necessary measures to prohibit the dismissal or its equivalent and all preparations for dismissal of workers, on the grounds that they exercised the rights provided for in this Directive. 2. have been dismissed, or have been subject to measures with equivalent effect, on the grounds that they have exercised the rights provided for in this Directive may request the employer to provide duly substantiated grounds for the dismissal or its equivalent. The employer shall provide those grounds in writing. 3. necessary measures to ensure that, when workers referred to in paragraph 2 establish, before a court or other competent authority, facts from which it may be presumed that there has been such dismissal or its equivalent, it shall be for the respondent toArticle 17 deleted proof Member States shall take the Workers who consider that they Member States shall take the Paragraph 3 shall not proeve that the dismissal was based on grounds other than those referred to in paragraph 1. 4. Member States from introducing rules of evidence which are more favourable to plaintiffs. 5. paragraph 3 to proceedings in which it is for the court or competent body to investigate the facts of the case. 6. criminal procedures, unless otherwise provided by the Member State.nt Member States need not apply Paragraph 3 shall not apply to
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In view of their potential to considerably affect the road haulage market, as well as the social protection of workers, serious infringements of Union rules on the posting of workers and the law applicable to contractual obligations should be added to the items relevant to the assessment of good repute.deleted
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The rules on national transport performed on a temporary basis by non- resident hauliers in a host Member State (‘cabotage’) should be clear, simple and easy to enforce, while broadly maicontainuing the level of liberalisation achieved so far.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) To this end, and in order to facilitate checks and to eliminate uncertainty, the limitation on the number of cabotage operations subsequent to an international carriage should be abolished, while the number of days available for such operations should be reduced.
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point iii
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 6
(xi) the posting of workerssocial and labour law;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 6 paragraph 1
(b) define the degree of seriousness of infringements according to their potential to create a risk of fatalities or serious injuries and to distort competition in the road transport market, including by undermining the working conditions of transport workershe threat to the health and safety of the worker posed by the non- compliance with labour law;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a – point i
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 2
(h) the number of employees working in the company over the last calendar year;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a – point i
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 2
(i) the total assets, liabilities, equity and turnover during the last two years;a copy of the annual financial report or other documents proving financial capacity, of the kind mentioned under Article 7(2).
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 228 #

2017/0123(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Once the goods carried in the course of an incoming international carriage from another Member State or from a third country to a host Member State have been delivered, hauliers referred to in paragraph 1 shall be allowed to carry out, with the same vehicle or, in the case of a coupled combination, the motor vehicle of that same vehicle, cabotage operations in the host Member State or in contiguous Member States. The last unloading in the course of a cabotage operation shall take place within 57 days from the last unloading in the host Member State in the course of the incoming international carriage’;
2018/02/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Drivers engaged in long-distance international transport operations spend long periods away from their home. The current requirements on the regular weekly rest unnecessarily prolong those periods. It is thus desirable to adapt the provision on the regular weekly rest in such a way that it is easier for drivers to carry out transport operations in compliance with the rules and to reach their home for a regular weekly rest, and be fully compensated for all reduced weekly rest periods. It is also necessary to provide that operators organise the work of drivers in such a way that these periods away from homtheir place of residence are not excessively long. Drivers should also be able to choose how they take their rest.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) There are differences among Member States in the interpretation and implementation of the weekly rest requirements as regards the place where the weekly rest should be taken. It is therefore appropriate to clarify that requirement to ensure that drivers are provided with adequate accommodation for their regular weekly rest periods if they are taken away from home. If this condition is to be fulfilled, the Member States must put sufficient investment into the construction of safe parking areas that are adapted to the needs of drivers.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 6 – paragraph 3
(2a) in Article 6, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: 3. The total accumulated driving time during any twofour consecutive weeks shall not exceed 9180 hours.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) two regular weekly rest periods of at least 45 hours and two reduced weekly rest periods of at least 24 hours., or:
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) one regular weekly rest period of at least 45 hours and three reduced rest periods of at least 24 hours.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
For the purposes of point (b) and (ba), the reduced weekly rest periods shall be compensated by an equivalent period of rest taken en bloc before the end of the thirdfourth week following the week in question.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – introductory part
8a. The regular weekly rest periods and any weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for previous reduced weekly rest shall notmay be taken in a vehicle. They shall be taken in a suitable accommodation, with adequate sleeping and sanitary facilities;vehicle if the vehicle is properly equipped for sleeping in, and is parked in a secure and suitably equipped parking area, if possible. Otherwise, these rest periods shall be taken in a suitable accommodation, with adequate sleeping and sanitary facilities; The Commission should encourage Member States to construct safe and suitably adapted parking areas. Two years after the regulation has entered into force, the Commission should draw up a report on the quality and number of parking areas in the Member States. If the Commission finds that the quality and quantity of parking spaces meet the requirements of European international transport, it should submit proposals for relevant legislative changes concerning the possibility to rest in the cabin.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 a – point b
(b) at home or at another privateanother location chosen by the driver.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2017/0122(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 8 – paragraph 8 b
8b. A transport undertaking shall organise the work of drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to spend at least one regular weekly rest period or a weekly rest of more than 45 hours taken in compensation for reduced weekly rest at homthe driver’s place of residence within each period of three consecutive weeks. Confirmation that a regular weekly rest period or a weekly rest period of more than 45 hours to compensate for a previous reduced weekly rest period in another location chosen by the driver has been taken shall take the form of a declaration by the driver. The Commission shall draw up a paradigm for this declaration.
2018/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Adequate, effective and consistent enforcement of the working time provisions is crucial for protecting the working conditions of drivers and preventing the distortions of competition resulting from non-compliance. Therefore it is desirable to extend the existing uniform enforcement requirements set out in Directive 2006/22/EC to controlling compliance with the working time provisions set out in Directive 2002/15/EU. However, due to its specificities, compliance with Directive 2002/15/EU can only be controlled at the premises and not during the roadside checks.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) Such balanced criteria should be based on a concept of a sufficient link of a driver with a territory of a host Member State. Therefore, a time threshold should be established, beyond which the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State shall apply in case of international transport operations. This time threshold should not apply to cabotage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/200918 and 1073/200919 since the entire transport operation is taking place in a host Member State. As a consequence the minimum rate of pay and the minimum annual paid holidays of the host Member State should apply to cabotage irrespective of the frequency and duration of the operations carried out by a driver. __________________ 18 Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 72). 19Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p.88)
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Due to its specificities and due to the lack of sufficient link of the driver with the territory of the host Member State, transit operations should be excluded from the scope of this Directive. The same exemption should be made with regards to transport operations in cross- border regions, carried out by transport operators from these regions, within 100 kilometres of the border.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 86 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure effective and efficient enforcement of the sector-specific rules on posting of workers and to avoid disproportionate administrative burdens for non-resident operators sector, specific administrative and control requirements should be established in the road transport sector, taking full advantage of control tools such as the digital tachograph. There is a need for more targeted and effective controls therefore there should be a clear distinction between the road controls and controls at the premises. This will also allow to multiply the number of controls and at the same time reduce administrative burdens.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In the case of a control of substantial activity any possible application of Article 4 paragraph 2, especially points d and e, of the Enforcement Directive 2014/67/EU should take into account the specific characteristics of the transport sector. This should be analysed together with Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 1071/2009 on conditions relating to the requirement of establishment.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
These checks shall cover each year a large and representative cross-section of mobile workers, drivers, undertakings and vehicles falling within the scope of Regulations (EC) No 561/2006 and (EU) No 165/2014 and in case of checks at the premises of mobile workers and drivers falling withing the scope of Directive 2002/15/EC.;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Each Member State shall organise checks in such a way that at least 3% of days worked by drivers of vehicles falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, Regulation (EU)165/2014 and Directive 2002/15/EC are checked. Member States shall focus especially on structurally and repeatedly non-compliant hauliers.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Checks at premises shall be planned in the light of past experience in relation to the various types of transport and undertakings. Checks of conformity with Directive 2002/15/EC shall be done solely at the premises. They shall also be carried out if serious infringements of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 or (EU) No 165/2014 or Directive 2002/15/EC have been detected at the roadside.;.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1
Member State shall submit the information requested by other Member States pursuant to paragraph 1(b) of this Article within 25 working days from the receipt of the request in cases requiring in-depth examination or involving checks at premises of the undertakings concerned. A shorter or longer time limit may be mutually agreed between the Member States if justified by the nature of the request. In urgent cases or cases requiring simple consultation of registers, such as of a risk rating system, the requested information shall be submitted within three working days.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Due to the absence of a sufficient link of a driver with a territory of a host Member State, transit operations should not be subject to this Directive, Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 136 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Directive 2006/22/EC
Annex I – Part A – point 6
(a) in Part A, the following point (6) is added: (6) Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2002/15/EC.;deleted weekly working times as set out in
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure effective and efficient enforcement of the sector-specific rules on posting of workers and to avoid disproportionate administrative burdens for non-resident operators sector, specific administrative and control requirements should be established in the road transport sector, taking full advantage of control tools such as the digital tachograph. In order to ensure the effectiveness of controls, it is important to make a distinction between the checks carried out at the roadside and at the premises of the undertakings. The checks could also be carried out remotely by electronic or digital means.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 148 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) In order to facilitate the implementation, application and enforcement of this Directive, the internal Market Information System (IMI) established by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 should be used in Member States for the enhanced exchange of information between regional and local authorities across borders. It could also be an advantage to extend the features of IMI to include the submission and transmission of simple declarations.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 154 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This Directive and Directive 96/71/EC do not apply to transit operations.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. This Directive and Directive 96/71/EC do not apply to undertakings performing carriage operations as defined by Regulation 1073/2009.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. This Directive and Directive 96/71/EC do not apply to undertakings established in cross-border regions and performing international transport operations as defined by Regulation 1072/2009 in these cross-border regions within 100 kilometres of the border.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
(-a) in paragraph 1, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: "1. Member States shall organise a system of appropriate and regular checks on correct and consistent implementation, as referred to in Article 1, both at the roadside and at premises of undertakings of all transport categories. In particular, checks of compliance with the provisions of Directive 2002/15/EC shall be limited to checks at the premises of undertakings or to remote checks by electronic or digital means." Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1518428909422&uri=CELEX:02006L0022-20170101)
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 180 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall not apply points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 3 (1) of Directive 96/71/EC to drivers in the road transport sector employed by undertakings referred to in Article 1(3)(a) of that Directive, when performing international carriage operations as defined by Regulations 1072/2009 and 1073/2009 where the period of posting to their territory to perform these operations is shorter than or equal to 39 days during a period of one calendar month.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2006/22/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Checks at premises shall be planned in the light of past experience in relation to the various types of transport and undertakings. They shall also be carried out if serious infringements of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 or (EU) No 165/2014 orhave been detected at the roadside. Checks of compliance with Directive 2002/15/EC shavell been detected at the roadside. carried out exclusively at the premises of the undertakings or remotely by electronic or digital means;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 223 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) a daily working period shorter than six12 hours spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as half a day;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 229 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) a daily working period of sixtwelve hours or more spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as a full day;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 233 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) breaks and rest periods as well as periods of availability spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as working period.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 239 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. All transport operations falling under the scope of this Directive are excluded from rules on long-term posting as referred in Article 1 of the legislative act amending Directive 96/71/EC.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Directive 2006/22/EC
Annex I – part A – point (6)
(a) in Part A, the following point (6) is added: ‘(6) Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2002/15/EC.;’deleted weekly working times as set out in
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 243 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. All transport operations falling under scope of this Directive shall be excluded from rules on collective agreements which are not universally applicable as defined in Article [...] of Directive 96/71/EC.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. By way of derogation from Article 9 paragraph 1 and 2 of the Enforcement Directive 2014/67/EU Member States may only impose the following administrative requirements and control measures:
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Transit operations shall be fully exempt from the scope of Directive 96/71/EC and of this Directive.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 258 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. This Directive and Directive 96/71/EC shall not apply to undertakings established in cross-border regions and performing international transport operations as defined by Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 in these cross-border regions within 100 km radius from the border.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 261 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) an obligation for the road transport operator established in another Member State to send a postingvia a dedicated public interface of the IMI system a standardized, electronic simple declaration to the national competent authorities at the latest at the commencement of the posting, in electronic form, in an official language of the host Member State or in English, containing only the following information:
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point i
(i) the identity of the road transport operator (in the case of a subsidiary, also the address of the headquarters);
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 271 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point iv
(iv) the anticipated duration, envisaged beginning and end date of the posting per worker;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point vi
(vi) the type of transport services, that is to say carriage of goods, carriage of passengers, per worker: international carriage, cabotage operation;
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – point vi a (new)
(via) the law applicable to the employment contract.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 282 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – subparagraph 1 a (new)
For the purpose of this point, the road transport operator may provide a declaration covering a period of a maximum of six months. The information referred to in points (ii) to (vii) shall be updated electronically by the road transport operator in line with the current factual situation. The public interface of the IMI system dedicated to transport operators contains country specific information with concrete rates of pay (remuneration) and employment conditions applicable to drivers in all Member States as well as links to all single official national websites established by Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 287 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) an obligation for the driver to keep and make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of the postingsimple declaration and evidence of transport operation taking place in the host Member State, such as: an electronic consignment note (e-CMR) or evidence referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 303 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) an obligation for the driver to keep and make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of the employment contract or an equivalent document within the meaning of Article 3 of Council Directive 91/533/EEC20 , translated into one of the official languages of the host Member State or into English; __________________ 20 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p. 32)deleted Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) an obligation for the driver to make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of payslips for last two months; during the roadside check, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may provide this copy;deleted
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 340 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 4 the road transport operator may provide a posting declDuring the roadside check, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may help in carrying out the check. Checks and controls of employment contract or an equivalent document within the meaning of aration covering a period of a maximum of six monthscle 3 of Council Directive 91/533/EEC and/ or payslips shall be carried out solely at the premises. Member States shall proceed in line with procedures put forward by Articles 6, 7 and 8 of Directive 2014/67/EU.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 357 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) a daily working period shorter than sixtwelve hours spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as half a day;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 363 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those provisions from […... [the date when COD 2016/007 -revised Posting of Workers Directive is applicable].
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall develop, by ways of implementing acts, by ... [2 years after date of the entry into force of this Directive], the public interface of IMI system dedicated to road transport operators as well as a standardised form of the declaration.
2018/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 368 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) a daily working period of sixtwelve hours or more spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as a full day;
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 384 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) breaks and rest periods as well as periods of availability spent in the territory of a host Member State shall be considered as working period.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 388 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Road transport operations falling under the scope of this Directive shall be excluded from rules on ''posting exceeding twenty-four months'' as referred in [Article 2a of Directive 96/71/EC as amended by 2016/0070(COD)].
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 392 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Road transport operations falling under the scope of this Directive shall be excluded from rules on collective agreements or arbitration awards which are not universally applicable as defined in Article 3(8) of Directive 96/71/EC.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 401 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. By way of derogation from Article 9(1) and (2) of Directive 2014/67/EU, Member States may only impose the following administrative requirements and control measures:
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 422 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part
(a) an obligation for the road transport operator established in another Member State to send a postingvia a dedicated public interface of IMI a standardised, electronic, simple declaration to the national competent authorities at the latest at the commencement of the posting, in electronic form, in an official language of the host Member State or in English, containing only the following information:
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 463 #

2017/0121(COD)

(aa) For the purpose of point (a) of this paragraph the road transport operator may provide a declaration covering a period of a maximum of six months. The information in points (ii) to (vi) shall be updated electronically by the road transport operator in line with the current factual situation. The public interface of the IMI dedicated to transport operators shall contain country specific information with concrete rates of pay (remuneration) and employment conditions applicable to drivers in all Member States as well as links to all single official national websites established by Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 472 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) an obligation for the driver to keep and make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of the postingsimple declaration and evidence of transport operation taking place in the host Member State, such as an electronic consignment note (e-CMR) or evidence referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 493 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) an obligation for the driver to keep and make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of the employment contract or an equivalent document within the meaning of Article 3 of Council Directive 91/533/EEC20 , translated into one of the official languages of the host Member State or into English; _________________ 20 Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p. 32)deleted
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 513 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) an obligation for the driver to make available, where requested at the roadside control, in paper or electronic form, a copy of payslips for last two months; during the roadside check, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may provide this copy;deleted
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 554 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 4 the road transport operator may provide a posting declaration covering a peDuring the roadside check, the driver shall be allowed to contact the head office, the transport manager or any other person or entity which may help in carrying out the check. Checks and controls of an employment contract or an equivalent document within the meaning of Article 3 of Council Directive 91/533/EEC and/ or payslips shall be carrioed of a maximum of six months. ut solely at the premises. Member States shall proceed in line with the procedures laid down in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of Directive 2014/67/EU.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 590 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those provisions from [insert the date of entry into force of Directive 96/71/EC* as amended by 2016/0070(COD)].
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 592 #

2017/0121(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The European transport sector because of its specificity and highly mobile nature shall be exempt from the application of the Posting of Workers Directive 96/71/EC* until the entry into force of this Directive.
2018/02/23
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 24 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) Equality between men and women is a fundamental principle of the Union. According to Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union the promotion of equality between women and men is one of the Union's aims and according to Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union equality between women and men should be promoted in all activities of the European Union. Similarly, Article 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union requires equality between women and men to be ensured in all areas, including employment, work and pay.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Work-life balance policies should contribute to the achievement of gender equality of access to work by promoting the participation of women in the labour market and the participation of men in childcare, making it easier for men to share caring responsibilities on an equal basis with women, and closing gender gaps in earnings, pay and payensions. Such policies should take into accountckle negative demographic changes including the effects of an ageing population.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Work-life balance policies should also reflect the fact that a sufficient number of caring facilities for both children and dependent relatives are a key prerequisite of increased participation of women in the labour market. Further complementary action is required to assure a holistic work-life balance environment. To this end the Union should support Member States in striving to achieve the objectives set at the European Council in Barcelona for childcare facilities in March 2002, in introducing other voluntary instruments, including incentives for employers to provide care facilities for workers, and in removing economic disincentives for second earners which prevent women from accessing the labour market or working full-time. The Union should use the European semester to support such action of Member States with due regard to Member States’ commitments to strengthen public finances.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The current Union legal framework provides limited incentives for men to assume an equal share of caring responsibilities. Lack of paid paternity and parental leave in many Member States contributes to the low take-up of such leave by fathers. The imbalance in the design of work-life balance policies between women and men reinforces gender differences between work and care. Conversely, use of work-life balance arrangements by fathers, such as leave or flexible working arrangements, has been shown to have a positive impact in reducing the relative amount of unpaid family work undertaken by women and leaving them more time for paid employment. Furthermore, the availability of quality, accessible, and affordable infrastructure for the care of children and other dependants has proven to be a crucial factor for work-life balance policies that facilitate the rapid return of new mothers to, and an increasing participation of women in the labour market.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) This Directive should apply to all workers who have employment contracts or other employment relationships. As is currently the case under Clause 2(3) of the Annex to Directive 2010/18/EU, this should include contracts relating to employment or employment relationships of part-time workers, fixed-term contract workers or persons with a contract of employment or employment relationship with a temporary agency. The Union should encourage Member States to extend the enjoyment of the rights set forth by this Directive to the self-employed through national legislative measures. This should especially apply in regard to the self-employed who contribute with their earnings to coverage schemes that finance compensation for the leaves. Member States should be encouraged to develop systems which would enable the self-employed to contribute to such coverage schemes.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) In order to encourage a more equal sharing of caring responsibilities between women and men, the right to paternity leave for fathers to be taken within the first year of a child’s life, preferably on the occasion of the birth or adoption of a child should be introduced. In order to take account of differences among Member States, the right to paternity leave should be irrespective of marital or family status as defined in national law. In order to deter potential abuse, the Member States should be able to introduce a requirement of a minimum period of service before a worker is entitled to benefit from that right, with a maximum duration of one year.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) As the majority of fathers do not avail themselves of their right to parental leave or transfer a considerable proportion of their leave entitlement to mothers, in order to encourage the second parent to take parental leave, this Directive, while maintaining the right of each parent to at least four months of parental leave currently provided for by Directive 2010/18/EU, extends from one to four months introduces an alternative for Member States to the current one monthe period of parental leave which cannot be transferred from one parent to the other. The alternative shall consist in granting an additional two months leave to parents who share at least half of the total parental leave period granted to them by national law, which should motivate parents in sharing caring responsibilities, while maintaining reasonable flexibility of specific family arrangements.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) In order to provide greater possibility for parents to use parental leave as their children grow up, the right to parental leave should be granted until the child is at least twelveeight years old. Member States should be able to specify taking into account in particular the constraints of micro, small and medium-sized businesses, a reasonable the period of notice to be given by the worker to the employer when applying for parental leave and to decide whether the right to parental leave may be subject to a certain period of service. In order to deter potential abuse, the Member States should be able to introduce a requirement of a minimum period of service before the worker is entitled to benefit from that right, with a maximum duration of one year. In view of the growing diversity of contractual arrangements, the sum of successive fixed- term contracts with the same employer should be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the period of service. To balance the needs of workers with those of employers, Member States should also be able to decide whether they define if the employer may be allowed to postpone the granting of parental leave under certain circumstances. In such cases, the employer should provide justification for the postponement. Given that flexibility makes it more likely that second parents, in particular fathers, will take up their entitlement to such leave, workers should be able to request to take parental leave on a full-time or part-time basis or in other flexible forms. It should be up to the employer whether or not to accept such a request for parental leave in other flexible forms than full-time. Member States should also assess if the conditions and detailed arrangements of parental leave should be adapted to the specific needs of parents in particularly disadvantaged situations, in particular with regard to children with disabilities, serious medical conditions or illness, in accordance with their national law and practice.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In order to facilitate the return to work following parental leave, workers and employers should be encouraged to voluntarily maintain contact during the period of leave and may make arrangements for any appropriate reintegration measures, to be decided between the parties concerned, taking into account national law, collective agreements and practice. Workers who do not wish to maintain contact should not be discriminated against in any way. It should be made clear that employees who do not wish to maintain contact should not be obliged to do so.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) In order to provide greater opportunities to remain in the work force for men and women carrying of elderly family member and/or other relatives in need of care, workers with a seriously ill relative in need of care or support dependant relativeue to a serious medical reason should have the right to take time off from work in the form of carers' leave to take care of that relative. To prevent abuse of that right, medical proof of the serious illness or dependency maymedical reason should be required prior to granting of the leave.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) In order to encourage working parents and carers to remain in the work force, those workers should be able to adapt their working schedules to their personal needs and preferences. Working parents and carers should therefore be able to request flexible working arrangements, meaning the possibility for workers to adjust their working patterns, including through the use of remote working arrangements, flexible working schedules, or a reduction in working hours, for caring purposes. In order to deter potential abuse, the Member States should be able to introduce a requirement of a minimum period of service before a worker is entitled to benefit from that right, with a maximum duration of one year. In order to address the needs of workers and employers, it should be possible for Member States to limit the duration of flexible working arrangements, including a reduction in working hours. While working part-time has been shown to be useful in allowing some women to remain in the labour market after having children, long periods of reduced working hours may lead to lower social security contributions translating into reduced or non-existing pension entitlements. The ultimate decision as to whether or not to accept a worker’s request for flexible working arrangements should lie with the employer, Specific circumstances underlying the need for flexible working arrangements can change. Workers should therefore not only have the right to return to their original working patterns at the end of a given agreed period, but should also be able to request to do so at any time where a change in the underlying circumstances so requires.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Workers exercising their rights to leave or to request flexible working arrangements should be protected against discrimination or any less favourable treatment on that ground. At the same time, in order to ensure balance between the interests of employers and workers, Member States should ensure that employers are protected against any abuse of such rights and detrimental effects for the functioning of companies, taking into account in particular the constraints of micro, small and medium-sized businesses.
2018/04/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1
This Directive applies to all workers, men and women, who have an employment contract or employment relationship as defined by law, collective agreement and/or practices in force in each Member State.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 284 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) "paternity leave" means paid leave from work for fathers to be taken on the on the grounds of the birth or adoption of a child, to be taken within the first year, of the child’s life, preferably on the occasion of the birth or adoption of a child;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 328 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) "carers' leave" means leave from work for carers in order to provide personal care or support to a relative in need of care or support due to a serious medical reason;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) "relative" means a worker's son, daughter, mother, father, grandmother, grandfather, spouse or partner in civil partnership, where such partnerships are envisaged by national law, and relative of the worker’s spouse;
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 345 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) "dependency" means a situation in which a person is, temporarily or permanently, in need of care due to disability or a serious medical condition other than serious illness;deleted
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 375 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that fathers have the right to take paternity leave of at least ten working days within the first year of a child’s life, preferably on the occasion of the birth or adoption of a child.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 383 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States may make the right to paternity leave subject to a period of work qualification or a length of service qualification not exceeding one year. In the case of successive fixed-term contracts, within the meaning of Council Directive 1999/70/EC1a, with the same employer, the sum of those contracts shall be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the qualifying period. __________________ 1a Council Directive of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ L 175, 10.7.1999, p. 43)
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall consider introducing the possibility of fathers to take additional unpaid paternity leave provided that this is not excessively burdensome for the employer.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 407 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that workers have an individual right to parental leave of at least four months to be taken before the child reaches a given age which shall be at least twelveeight.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 417 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where Member States allow one parent to transfer their parental leave entitlement to the other parent, they shall ensure that at least fourone months of parental leave cannot be transferred, or, alternatively, provide an additional two months leave to parents who share at least half of the total parental leave period granted to them by national law.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 576 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that, at the end of leave referred to in Article 4, 5 or 6, workers are entitled to return to their jobs or to obtain equivalent posts on terms and conditions which are no less favourable to them and which correspond to the employment contract, and to benefit from any improvement in working conditions to which they would have been entitled during their absence.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 651 #

2017/0085(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17 a Dialogue with relevant stakeholders With a view to promoting the objectives of this Directive, the European Union and its Member States shall encourage dialogue with relevant stakeholders, in particular with parents and family associations, employers and trade unions.
2018/04/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the digitisation of industry represents a major challenge as well as opportunities in terms of the organisation of work and therefore requires targeted responses regarding employment, social and education policies, as well as the provision of up-to-date infrastructure;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in cooperation with social partners, to regularly assess the impact of digitisation on the quality, number and types of jobs as well as demand for proper skills and qualification in the future and to adjust related policies accordingly;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2016/2271(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to clarify the legal situation of platform workers and to guarantee all workers the same social rightsgather data in order to evaluate the impact of digitisation on forms of employment and working conditions and undertake necessary initiatives in order to clarify the legal situation of platform workers and to guarantee all workers social rights comparable to other forms of employment while taking into account the specificities of the collaborative economy, including the freedom of association, the right to conclude collective agreements and the right to organise;
2017/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 20 November 2012 on Social Investment Pact as a response to the crisis,
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that introducing minimum income schemes in all EU Member States - consisting of specific measures supporting people whose income is insufficient with a funding supply and facilitated access to services - istogether with active labour policies - are one of the most effective ways to combat poverty, guarantee an adequate standard of living and foster social integration;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that it is vital for everyone to have access to sufficient minimum income schemes to be able to meet their basic requirements and that these schemes should guarantee the non-perpetuation of social dependency and should be combined with incentives to education and entering the labour market;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘European minimum income and poverty indicators’ and supports the proposal concerning a directive on adequate minimum income in the European Union, which should lay down common rules and indicators, provide methods for monitoring its implementation and improve dialogue between the individuals concerned, the Member States and the EU institutions; is of the view that a framework of this kind should be based on tangible factors and should bear in mto further analyse existing schemes and come up with further recommendations; calls on the Commission to facilitate exchange of best practice among Member States with regards to rules and indicators, the manner and the means of providindg the social and economic context of each Member State; calls on the Commission and the Member States, in this regard, to evaluate the manner and the means of providing an adequate minimum income in all Member Stateminimum income as well as methods for monitoring its implementation in order to improve dialogue between the individuals concerned, the Member States and the EU institutions;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that minimum income schemes should ensure payment of an income that is abovesupport that lifts individuals and/or households beyond the poverty line, prevents situations of severe material deprivation or, where applicable, lift households out of those situationsand provides access to public services such as health, education or child care;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 223 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses the importance of defining appropriate eligibility criteria at national level in order to benefit from an adequate minimum income scheme;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Is of the opinion that adequate minimum income schemes Recommends that Member States, when setting minimum income schemes, take into account the fact that the at-risk- of-poverty threshould is set minimum incomes at a level equivalent to at least 60 % of median income in the Member State concerned; at 60% of the national median equalised disposable income, however recalls that designing social policies is the responsibility of Member States in line with the subsidiarity principle; notes that there are also other factors that Member States can take into account such as living standards, prices, basket of goods or national relative poverty line;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 259 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to carry out an impact assessmentevaluation of minimum income schemes in the Union and to consider further steps, taking into account the economic and social circumstances of each Member State as well as assessing whether the schemes enable households to meet their basic personal needs;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2016/2270(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that supporting job creation should be a priority for the European Union as a first step towards reducing poverty;
2017/03/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to carry out a thorough analysis of the effectiveness of investments in human capital co-financed through European funds; stresses that in spite of the expectation of economic growth, the employment level in Europe is expected to remain lower than in 2008;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that 6 million unemployed young people are to benefit from the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) – which willcould help them find jobs or improve their skills and qualifications – now that YEI has been integrated into 34 ESF programmes in the 20 eligible Member States; is concerned, however, about the delayed start to the implementation of the YEI; urges Member States to intensify their efforts to ensure that the results envisaged are achieved successfullyrapidly and successfully, particularly with respect to funds made available in the form of advance payments;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Expresses serious concern that in the case of the Youth Guarantee scheme, which in 2014-2020 will receive a total of EUR 12.7 billion from the European Social Fund and the special Youth Employment Initiative, and which, on the basis of this funding, is already seen as the driving force behind efforts to boost youth employment, the Commission has not carried out a cost-benefit analysis, which is standard procedure for all major Commission initiatives. Consequently, there is a lack of information on the potential overall cost of implementing the guarantee throughout the EU and, as the European Court of Auditors has stressed, a risk that the total amount of funding may be insufficient.
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses the importance of communication, particularly digital communication, through which information on potential assistance in finding training, a traineeship or work co- financed through EU funds can reach the greatest number of young people; calls for more communication to promote such portals as DROP’PIN and EURES and increase young people’s opportunities for mobility in the internal market, which is considered the biggest untapped potential in the fight against unemployment in the EU;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Noting the initial promising assessments of activities under the Youth Employment Initiative, draws attention to the conclusions of Parliament’s analysis highlighting the need for integration with the structural reforms in the Member States in order to achieve substantial and tangible effects from the funds invested, otherwise the Initiative will merely be an ordinary means of budget assistance;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/2148(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses the importance of tackling the wastage of EU funds to help improve the worsening image of the EU in Europe; looks forward to the results of the reform of the structural and investment funds, in particular of the ex ante conditionality, and suggests introducing indicators to assess the effectiveness of ongoing programmes;
2016/09/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that trade unions must be able to operate independently and freely within their competences to promote and protect workers’ rights, particularly health and safety, and that they are a necessary partner in social dialogue and collective bargaining;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that price is still the determining factor in the buying practices of brands and retailers, often at the expense of workers’ welfare; calls for the EU to work with stakeholders to develop a fair and stable pricing mechanism which guarantees that a decent proportion of sales revenue is paid to the worker in the form of a living wageenforce existing law and to make sure that workers are paid at least minimum wages or at least a living wage especially in third countries where there is lack of adequate legislation;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on efficient and well-targeted initiatives which will improve the situation in the garment sector in Member States, make it more competitive and innovative in order to boost employment;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2016/2140(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Calls for national and European initiatives to encourage consumers to buy products made locally;
2016/12/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) demonstrate the differences that exist between Member States; argues that the Member States should continue to give priority to reforms that will strengthen their economic recovery, making a commitment to investment, implementing structural reforms and taking an approach based on fiscal and budgetary responsibility; social investments in human capital shall however constitute core complementary action, since human capital is one of the factors of growth and a motor of competitiveness and development;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Despite producing results in skills and knowledge, European Union's education and training systems do not perform internationally and present growing skill shortages, leaving European employers unable to locally fill in the job vacancies; underlines the need to further invest and develop education and training systems, providing the society with the tools and capacities to readapt to changing labour market demands;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls for a completion of the European internal market as the most potential tool for growth and fight against unemployment in the EU, with a parallel control of law enforcement and respect for rules;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that economic growth should guarantee a positive social impact; welcomes the introduction of the three new headline social indicators in the macroeconomic imbalances procedure; reiterates the call for these to be placed on an equal footing with existing economic indicators, thereby guaranteeing that internal imbalances are better assessed and making structural reforms more effective; calls, in this connection, for a social imbalances procedure to be introduceddeeper analysis of social imbalances in order to understand better a cause-effect link of policies and actions;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a strong commitment to promoting the Juncker Plan (EFSI) in Member States with a low level of participation with a parallel analysis of the obstacles encountered;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises the significant progress made by the Member States in implementing structural reforms, while nevertheless taking the view that further progress is necessary:, especially with regards to pension and health care systems overburdened by the demographic changes of the European population;
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2016/2101(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for account to be taken of the challenges that have been emerging in the EU since 2015, which have required serious adaptation efforts; calls on the Commission not to apply any sanctions to the Member States in 2016, especially with regards to the migration crisis and terrorism (that hit certain regions more than others);
2016/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2016/2101(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7a (new)
7a. Calls for a completion of the European internal market as the most potential tool for growth and fight against unemployment in the EU, with a parallel control of law enforcement and respect for rules;
2016/08/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 235 #

2016/2101(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises the need to improve the EU’s overall capacity to create and sustain jobs and thus to tackle high levels of unemployment, while considering that migration could play an important role in compensating for the negative effects of the ageing population; emphasises, however, that this alone cannot be the main response to address structural demographic, labour market or fiscal challenges but that it should be complemented with efficient public expenditure, especially in high-quality social and environmentally sustainable investments and further progress in balancing overburdened pension and health care systems;
2016/08/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 254 #

2016/2101(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Highlights the importance of resilient and competitive labour markets where an appropriate trade-off is maintained between economic, social and human costs in accordance with the EU values of solidarity and subsidiarity, with a focus on the upgrading of educational systems and vocational education;
2016/08/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 301 #

2016/2101(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the importance of better addressing the high tax wedge on labour given that high taxation diminishes incentives for the inactive, the unemployed, second earners and low-wage earners to return to employment, by promoting a growth-friendly tax shift towards consumption and environmental taxes;
2016/08/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 8 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the importance of a highly competitive internal market economy as a prerequisite for the development of a social pillar,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the European Union needs a paradigm shift towards a strongrenewed approach towards European social model based on solidarity, social justice, a fair distribution of wealth, gender equality, a high-quality public education system, quality employment and sustainable growth - a model that ensures good social protection for all, empowers vulnerable groups, enhances participation in civil and political life, and improves the living standards for all citizens, delivering on the objectives and rights set out in the EU Treaties, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Social Charter;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the Commission is expected to come forward in the spring of 2017 with a proposal for a binding European Pillar of Social Rights which will serve as a reference framework to screen the employment and social performance of participating Member States, to drive reforms at national level and, more specifically, to serve as a compass for renewed convergence between Member States;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) cannot be limited to amust consist of both declaration of principles or good intentions but must consist of real matter (and tangible elements such as national and EU legislation, policy-making mechanisms and financial instruments), delivering positive impact on citizens’ lives in the short, medium and long term and enabling support for European construction in the 21st century by effectively upholding social rights and Treaty objectives, strengthening cohesion and upward convergence, and helping to complete EMU in accordance with Treaties and subsidiarity principle;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 197 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the EPSR should equip European citizens with stronger means to keep control over their lives as well as to adapt to changing socio- economic conditions and make markets work for wellbeing and sustainable development;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that all social policies shall also aim at activating citizens on the labour market, encouraging them to up- grade their skills and promoting entrepreneurship;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the enactment of a directive on fairon Member States to constantly take efforts in order to improve working conditions for all forms of employment, ensuring for every worker a core set of enforceable rights, including equal treatmentnon- discrimination, equal treatment between men and women, social protection, protection in case of dismissal, health and safety protection, provisions on working time and rest time, freedom of association and representation, collective bargaining, collective action, access to training, and adequate information and consultation rights; underlines that this directive should apply to employees as well as to all workers inese rights should be also applicable as much as possible to all non-standard forms of employment, such as fixed-term work, part-time work, on-demand work, self- employment, crowd-working, internship or traineeship and should take into account specificities of flexible forms of employment; requests that the adequate EU acquis be updated accordingly if necessary so as to apply to all workers;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Calls for decisive steps towards legal certaintyopening a discussion on what constitutes ‘employment’, also for work intermediated by digital platforms; underlines that open- ended contracts should remain the norm given their importance for socio-economic security; calls for the directive on fair working conditions to include relevant minimum standards to be ensured in more precarious forms of employment, in particular:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point a
a. decent working conditions for internships, traineeships and apprenticeships, prohibitingutting a duration limit to those that are unpaid or paid so little that they do not enable workersintern, trainee or apprentice to make ends meet;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 325 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point b
b. for work intermediated by digital platforms, a definition of employment that is less dependent on full cumulation of the relevant criteria: introduction of minimum standards of collaboration rules with a full and comprehensive information to the service provider on their rights and obligations, entitlements, associated level of social protection and the identity of employer; calls on Member States to ensure a proper surveillance of the terms and conditions of employment, preventing abuses of dominant positions by the platforms’ owners;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 340 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point c
c. limits regarding on-demand work: zero-hour contracts should be banned and certain core working hours should be guaranteed to all wointroducing duration limit or renewal limit to zero-hour contracts, taking into account that they often facilitate the access to the labour markerst;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 379 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the need for renewed upward convergence in wages throughout the EU; calls on the Commission to actively support a wider coverage for collective bargaining, with a full respect for national labour law systems of Member States; considers that to ensure decent living wages, minimum wages set at a decent level are necessary; recommends to the Member States the establishment of national wage floors through legislation or collective bargaining, with the objective of attaining gradually at least 60 % of the respective national average wage;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 391 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that the right to healthy and safe working conditions also involves limitations on working time and provisions on minimum rest periods and annual leave; awaits Commission proposals for legislation and other concrete measures to uphold this right for all workers, reflecting all current knowledge about health and safety risksespecially those employed in new forms of flexible employment or persons in employment within the new schemes of collaborative economy based on digital platforms while taking into account specificities of these forms of employment;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 455 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Supports more integrated provision of social protection benefits and social services as a way to make the welfare state more understandable and accessible while not weakening social protection and Internal Market freedoms; points to the importance of informing citizens about social rights and to the potential of e- government solutions, possibly including a European social security card, which could improve individual awareness and also help mobile workers clarify their contributions and entitlements;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 476 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Agrees with the importance of universal access to timely, good-quality and affordable preventative and curative health care; emphasises that all workers and self- employed persons must be covered by health insurance;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 493 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Is aware that rising life expectancy and workforce shrinking pose a challenge to the sustainability of pensions systems and to intergenerational fairness; reaffirms that the best response is to increase the overall employment rate, to raise labour productivity, to lengthen the average duration of labour market participation, and to support the gradual reduction of working time in preparation for retirement; considers that pensionable ages should reflect, besides life expectancy, other factors including labour market trends, the economic dependency ratio, the birth rate and differences in job arduousness;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 510 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Insists that all workers should be covered by insurance against involuntary unemployment or part-time employment,unemployment benefit schemes coupled with job-search assistance and investment in (re)-training;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 542 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for a European framework for minimum income schemnational minimum income schemes to be established by Member States; highlights the importance of such schemes for maintaining human dignity as well as their role as a form of social investments enabling people to undertake training and/or look for work;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 578 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers access to quality and affordable long-term care services, including home-based care, to be a right that should be upheld with the help of suitably qualified professionals employed under decent conditions; believes that low- income households should therefore be targeted by adequate public services and tax deductions; repecalls on Member States its call for legislationto establish measures on carers' leave accompanied by adequate remuneration and social protection;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 593 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers child poverty to be a major issue on which Europe should ‘act big’; calls for the swift implementation of aestablishment of a so called Child Guarantee in all Member States, so thatwhich would consist in allowing every child now living in poverty canto have access to free healthcare, free education, free childcare, decent housing and, proper nutrition and help against any form of violence;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 620 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for national legislation to ensure that access to social housing or adequate housing benefits are provided for those in need, obviously including homeless people, and that vulnerable people and poor households are protected against eviction; calls for tax incentives to help young people on low incomes set up their own households; calls for greater use of the EFSI to support urban renewal and affordable housing provision;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 640 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for national legislation ensuring fair access for all to good-quality and affordable social services of general interest and other essential services, such as e-communications, energy, public transport and financial services; highlights the role of social enterprises;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 656 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Supports the creation of a Skills Guarantee as a new right for everyonen instrument to help low- skilled adults to acquire fundamental skills for the 21st century, including such as key competences in literacy, numeracy and digital literacyskills; highlights this as an important social investment, requiring proper implementation and adequate financing;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 677 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – introductory part
19. Is alarmconcerned about the spread of precariousness arising from the excessive use of ‘atypical’ contracts; stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient institutional and budgetary capacities to provideexisting misuse and abuse of ‘non- standard’ employment contracts; considers, that these contracts can offer an effective tool for workers to enter on the labour market and for companies to respond to shifts in demand; calls on careful monitoring of implementation and enforcement of EU legislation such as Fixed- term Work Directive, Part- time Work Directive and Temporary Agency Work Directive; stresses the importance of ensuring at Member States level an adequate protection for people in non-standard forms of employment; considers in particular that:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 695 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – point a
a. social insurance schemes must be broadened in applicable to all wordkers to enable all workersthem to accumulate entitlements providing income security in situations such as unemployment, involuntary part-time work or career breaks for family or training reasons, pension, health problems;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 707 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – point b
b. all workers should have a personal activity account, also easily accessible through a website and/or a smartphone applicatiby electronic means taking into account needs of disabled persons, where they could consult their social entitlements;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 722 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Points out that secure professional transitions require adequate investment, both in the institutional capacity of public employment services and to assist individual job-search and upskilling; highlights that the preservation and portability of social entitlements accumulated during the career and life- cycle should be ensured to facilitate job and professional transitions;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 730 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for full implementation of the Youth Guarantee for all people under 30 and of the recommendation on the long- term unemployed; highlights these as important structural reforms and social investments that are in need of adequate financingimplementation and financing; calls for constant monitoring of effectiveness of these tools, especially in terms of employment, and adaptation of changes where necessary;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 751 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – point a
a. Directive 2006/54/EC should be revismonitored and enforced in order to strengthen existing mechanisms to ensure equal treatment between men and women, close persisting gender gaps in pay and pensions and reduce occupational segregation;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 759 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – point b
b. there is a need for new legislative proposals on family leave schemes, including maternity leave, paternity leave, parental leave and carers’ leave,Member States should provide all parents and carers with adequate leave arrangements for children and other dependent relatives and access to care services and encouraginge equal take-up of leave arrangements by men and women across all categories of workers in order to improve women’s access to and position within the labour market and facilitate work-life balance;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 769 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – point b a (new)
ba. flexible working arrangements, including in the area of working time, should be available and should be encouraged in order to facilitate reconciliation of work and family life;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 778 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to set out new concreteevaluate implementation and enforcement of measures to ensure non- discrimination and equal opportunities and suggest appropriate initiatives if needed;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 804 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Emphasises that labour mobility within the EUis a fundamental freedom of the EU and it is a right whose exercise must be supported but which should not be forced on workers by poor conditions in their home regions, and should not undermine host countries’ social standard; calls for proper implementation and enforcement of EU rules with regards to mobility of workers and cross- border provision of services in order to secure workers’ rights and apply appropriate social standards in accordance with existing legislation; notes that mobility allows for better and more effective use of Europe's human capital, allows workers to improve their kills and competences and companies to fulfil labour force shortages as well as leads to social convergence; notes that mobility should be voluntary and that it should not be an excuse for Member States to avoid necessary labour market reforms;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 843 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to propose a clear roadmap for legislative updates anticipated by an evidence-based evaluation and Fitness Checks indicating an extent to which an intervention is necessary and other measures that are necessary for full practical application of the EPSR; highlights that in cases of conflict of law, the horizontal social clause (Article 9 TFEU) should be properly applied;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 851 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – introductory part
26. Considers that the objective of upward social convergence should be underpinned by a set of targets, building on the Europe 2020 strategy and the Sustainable Development Goals and serving to guide the coordination of economic, employment and social policies in the EU; believes that these targets could alscalls on the Commission to come up with a proposal for indicators to form part of the ConvEPSR as a refergence Code currently being discussed for the euro area, and could be based on the following indicators which are directly affected by public policieframework to screen the employment and social performance of participating Member States, to drive reforms at national level and, more specifically, to serve as a compass for renewed convergence within the euro area such as:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 881 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point c a (new)
ca. rate of people completing third level education;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 909 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point h
h. the coverage of collective bargaining;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 937 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls for a rebalancing of the European Semester so that the existing scoreboard of key employment and social indicators and the new Convergence Code are directly taken into account in formulating CSRs and the euro area recommendation as well as for the activation of EU instruments; urges a stronger role for the Macroeconomic Dialogue with social partners; considers ‘macro-social surveillance to be of great importance for avoiding that economic imbalances are reduced at the expense of worsening the employment and social situation;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 952 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls for a ‘silver rule’ on social investment to be applied when implementing the Stability and Growth Pact, namely to consider certain public social investments having a clear positive impact on economic growth (e.g. childcare or education and training) as being eligible for favourable treatment when assessing government deficits and compliance with the 1/20 debt rule;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 971 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Highlights that today’s phenomena of capital-intensive production, high rates of inequality and the continuing rise in ’atypical’ work imply a need to increase the role of general tax revenue in cofinancing social insurance schemes in order to provide decent social protection for all;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 987 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – introductory part
30. Reiterates its call for the raising of theaccelerating the implementation of OPs under MFF 2014-20 ceilings in order to cope with increasedurgent needs; calls, in particular, for:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1004 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – point b
b. an increase in the volumeffective use of the European Social Fund, the EGF and the FEAD;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1028 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the EIB to refocus the EFSImake sure that projects financed from EFSI also concentrate on job creation and social investment and adapt its risk/return requirements accordingly;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1044 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that the specific dynamics of economic adjustment within the euro area call for the development of two financial instruments, within the euro area’s fiscal capacity, that would be particularly relevant for the implementation of the EPSR: a. a fund for renewed structural convergence, supporting the implementation of socially just reforms and investments that are necessary for increasing the growth potential of crisis- affected areas and restoring upward social convergence, including implementation of the Youth Guarantee, Skills Guarantee and Child Guarantee; b. a European unemployment insurance scheme, complementing national schemes in cases of severe cyclical downturn and helping prevent the translation of an asymmetric shock into structural disadvantage;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1052 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point a
a. a fund for renewed structural convergence, supporting the implementation of socially just reforms and investments that are necessary for increasing the growth potential of crisis- affected areas and restoring upward social convergence, including implementation of the Youth Guarantee, Skills Guarantee and Child Guarantee;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1068 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point b
b. a European unemployment insurance scheme, complementing national schemes in cases of severe cyclical downturn and helping prevent the translation of an asymmetric shock into structural disadvantage;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1083 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Commission to integrate the above-mentioned financial instruments in its proposals for the post- 2020 multiannual financial framework and its white paper on EMU;deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1104 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Considers that the EPSR should be adopted in 2017 as a bindingresult of ordinary legislative procedure in form of ag reement between the European Parliament and the European Council,ference framework to screen the employment and social performance of participating Member States, to drive reforms at national level and, more specifically, to serve as a compass for renewed convergence; this agreement should involvinge social partners at the highest level, and should contain a clear roadmap for implementation, with concrete commitments and target d and full respect of freedoms enshrined in the Treaties;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Stresses that increasing the employment level of women is a key condition for eliminating the gender pension gap (40,2%) which results from accumulative disadvantages experienced by women in the labour market throughout their lives, such as disrupted and shorter careers due to insufficient means for reconciliation of family and professional life as well as the pay gap;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that the implementation of the principle of equal pay for the same work andRecalls that in accordance with article 157 TFEU "Member States shall ensure that the principle of equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or for work of equal value is applied" and that this is crucial to reducinge pay and pension gaps and to eliminatinge the risk of poverty among women;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that all people have the right to a decent public pension, and rRecalls that the Union recognises the entitlement to social security benefits and social services which provide protection in the event of old age or dependency;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Member States to increase minimum wages as an important tool forconcentrate their efforts on eliminating the pay gap between men and women, promoting equal opportunities, increasing women's participation in the labour market and improving reconciliation of work, family and private life in order to narrowing the pension gaps;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 159 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to introduce or reinforce pension credits for other social protection measures which mitigate the negative impacts of career interruptions resulting from caringformal care leaves, whatever the family and/or marital status;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the sustainability and security of pension schemes can be reinforced by diversifying saving sources and building a system that is based on public and private pillars and by complementing social security with tax contributions as well as introducing tax incentives;
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Member States to reverse any reforms ofeliminate any elements of their pension systems that aggravate imbalances in pensions (especially gender imbalances) and to take into account the gender impact of any future pension reforms.
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on Member States to invest in affordable and accessible quality care for children and other dependents as a way to support women who often have a more disrupted career than men and more often take up care responsibilities in the family.
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2016/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Calls on the European Commission and on the Member states to run information campaigns and constantly improve pension literacy among women and men.
2016/10/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) The results of the mutual evaluation process revealed a lack of clarity as regards the criteria to be used by national competent authorities when assessing the proportionality of requirements restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions, as well as uneven scrutiny of such measures at all levels of regulation. To avoid fragmentation of the internal market and eliminate barriers to taking-up and pursuit of certain employed or self- employed activities and therefore boost employment where relevant, it is therefore necessary to establish a common approach at Union level, preventing disproportionate and unduly excessive measures from being adopted.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) This Directive establishes rules for proportionality test to be carried out before introducing new, or amending existing, legislative, regulatory or administrative provisions restricting access or pursuit of regulated professions.It has to be underlined, that this Directive leaves the prerogative to regulate access to or pursuit of regulated professions within Member States in respect of principles of non- discrimination and proportionality.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The burden of proof of justification and proportionality lies on the Member States. The reasons for regulation invoked by a Member State by way of justification should thus be accompanied by an analysis of the appropriateness and proportionality of the measure adopted by that State and by specific well justified evidence substantiating its arguments.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The economic impact of the measure, including a cost-benefit analysis with particular regard to the degree of competition in the market and the quality of the service provided, as well as the impact on the right to work and on the free movement of persons and services within Member States and the Union should be duly taken into account by the competent authorities. Based on this analysis, Member States should ascertain, in particular, whether the extent of the restriction of access to or pursuit of regulated professions within the Union is proportionate to the importance of the objectives pursued and the expected gains.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20 a (new)
(20 a) The extent and degree of the criteria being used during the proportionality test should be appropriate and adjusted to the content of the provisions being introduced and its impact.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) It is essential for the proper functioning of the internal market to ensure that Member States provide information to citizens, representative associations, social partners and consumers or other relevant stakeholders before introducing new measures restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions and give them the opportunity to make known their views.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) To facilitate the exchange of best practices, each Member State should encouragesure that the relevant competent authorities to share adequate and regularly updated information with other Member States on the regulation of professions. The Commission should take relevant initiatives in order to encourage smooth exchange of information between Member States.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The reasons for considering that a provision is justified, necessary, non- discriminatory and proportionate shall be substantiated by qualitative and, wherever possible, quantitative evidence.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The relevant competent authorities shall consider in particular whether those provisions are objectively justified on the basis of public policy, public security or public health, or by overriding reasons in the public interest, such as preserving the financial equilibrium of the social security system, the protection of consumers, recipients of services and workers, the safeguarding of the proper administration of justice, fairness of trade transactions, combating fraud and prevention of tax evasion and avoidance, road safety, the protection of the environment and the urban environment, the health of animals, intellectual property, the safeguarding and conservation of the national historic and artistic heritage, threats to social policy objectives and cultural policy objectives.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the nature of the risks related to the public interest objectives pursued, in particular the risks to consumers, patients to professionals or third parties;
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) the economic impact and impact on employment of the measure, with particular regard to the degree of competition in the market and the quality of the service provided, job creation, employment opportunities for young graduates as well as the impact on the free movement of persons and services within the Union;
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 282 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point j a (new)
(j a) proportionality of administrative requirements.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Member States shall, by appropriate means, inform citizens, service recipients, those in relevant training or education, representative associations and relevant stakeholders other than the members of the profession before introducing new legislative, regulatory or administrative provisions restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions, or amending existing ones, and give them the opportunity to make known their views.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 299 #

2016/0404(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. For the purposes of the efficient application of this Directive, before introducing new legislative, regulatory or administrative provisions restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions, or amending existing ones, Member States shall encourage thsure exchange of information with competent authorities of other Member States on matters covered by this Directive, such as the particular way they regulate a profession or the effects of regulation identified in similar sectors of activities, on a regular basis, or, where appropriate, on an ad hoc basis.
2017/09/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Furthermore, the European services e-card should contribute positively towards making the European market more competitive, facilitating administrative provisions for businesses, which could give a further push for growth and employment policies.
2017/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Holders of a European services e- card may want to second staff into the territory of the host Member State. When doing so, service providers may be subject to requirements, such as prior declarations addressed to the host Member State, necessary for the protection of posted workers. The European Services e-card will in no way affect the content of such declarations and the responsibilities by the host Member State in that regard.
2017/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) As regards the prior declaration that may be required under Article 9 of Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council25, the electronic platform connected to IMI should direct holders of a European services e-card to electronic national procedures put in place in the host Member State where the workers will be posted, wherever such national procedures allow for the electronic submission of the above- mentioned prior declaration. __________________ 25 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 11)
2017/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) As regards the prior declaration that may be required under Article 9 of Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council25, the electronic platform connected to IMI should direct holders of a European services e-card to electronic national procedures put in place in the host Member State where the workers will be posted, wherever such national procedures allow for the electronic submission of the above- mentioned prior declaration. __________________ 25 Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 11)
2017/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2016/0403(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) The electronic platform connected to IMI should be made available by the Commission to those Member States that have previously communicated to the Commission their intention to make use of this possibility. Where Member States decide to allow for the use of IMI for the sending of the prior declaration in relation to workers posted in their territory, holders of a European services e-card shall be able to submit a declaration as referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2014/67/EU directly to the competent authority in the host Member State as defined in Article 2(a) of Directive 2014/67/EU, through the electronic platform connected to IMI. To that end, a host Member State should provide all the elements required in accordance with point a) of paragraph 1 and paragraph 2 of Article 9 of Directive 2014/67/EU as the basis for a multi-lingual form to be submitted for the declaration of posted workers on its territory. The Commission should publish this form in the Official Journal and make it available in the electronic platform connected to IMI. The relevant information with regard to the elements required should be available for the host Member State concerned in full compliance with the language requirements set out in Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2014/67/EU. The experience of these Member States with the use of the electronic platform connected to IMI should be part of the assessment foreseen in the second subparagraph of Article 19 of this Regulation.
2017/11/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) It is necessary to guarantee legal certainty by clarifying that aAccess to social security benefits for economically inactive mobile citizens in the host Member State, may be made conditional upon that citizen holding a legal right of residence in that Member State in accordance with Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.33 For these purposes, an economically inactive citizen should be clearly distinguished from a jobseeker whose right of residence is conferred directly by Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. __________________ 33only to the extend settled by existing case law C-133/13 Dano, C-67/14 Alimanovic and C-299/14 Garcia-Nieto. OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure clarity regarding the terminology in EU law, the term “posting” should only be used for the posting of workers within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.34 In addition, to achieve consistency in treatment between employed and self-employed persons it is necessary that the special rules for the determination of applicable legislation in the cases of workers who are temporarily posted or sent to another Member State should apply consistently to both employed and self-employed persons. __________________ 34 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In the area of unemployment benefits, the rules on the aggregation of periods of insurance should be applied uniformly by all Member States. With the exception of cross-border workers referred to in Article 65(2), the rules on the aggregation of periods for the purpose of conferring entitlement to unemployment benefits should be subject to the condition that an insured person has most recently completed at least three months of insurance in that Member State. The previously competent Member State should become competent for all insured persons who do not satisfy this condition. In this case, registration with the employment services of the Member State of most recent insurance should have the same effect as registration with the employment services of the Member State, where the unemployed person had been previously insuredone day of insurance in that Member State.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Family benefits intended to replace or grant additional income during child- raising periods are designed to meet the individual and personal needs of the parent subject to the legislation of the competent Member State and therefore are distinguishable from other family benefits as they are intended to compensate a parent for loss of income or salary during time spent raising a child rather than solely meeting general family expenses.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5 – addition
2. In Recital 5, after “the different national legislation for the persons concerned” the following wording is inserted: , subject to the conditions as regards the access to certain social security benefits by economically inactive mobile EU citizens in the host Member State set out in Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.40 __________________ 40 OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5
(2a) Recital 5 is replaced by the following: (5) It is necessary, within the framework of such coordination, to guarantee within the CommunityUnion equality of treatment under theacross different national legislationaw for the persons concerned.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5a
(5a) The Court of Justice has held that Member States are entitled to make the access of economically inactive citizens in the host Member State to social security benefits, which do not constitute social assistance within the meaning of Directive 2004/38/EC subject to a legal right of residence within the meaning of that Directive. The verification of the legal right of residence should be carried out in accordance with the requirement of Directive 2004/38/EC. For these purposes, an economically inactive citizen should be clearly distinguished from a jobseeker whose right of residence is conferred directly by Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In order to improve legal clarity for citizens and institutions, a codification of this case law is necessary.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 168 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5b
(5b) Member States should ensure that economically inactive EU mobile citizens are not prevented from satisfying the condition of having comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State, as laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC. This may entail allowing such citizens to contribute in a proportionate manner to a scheme for sickness coverage in the Member State in which they habitually reside.deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5c
(5c) Notwithstanding the limitations on the right to equal treatment for economically inactive persons, that arise from the Directive 2004/38/EC or otherwise by virtue of Union law, nothing within this Regulation should restrict the fundamental rights recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably the right to human dignity (Article 1), the right to life (Article 2) and the right to healthcare (Article 35).deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 24
(24) LIn line with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, long-term care benefits for insured persons and members of their families need to be coordinated according to specific rules which, in principle,should, in principle, continue to be coordinated following the rules applicable to sickness benefits, in line with the case law of the Co. However, those rules should take into account the specific naturte of Justicelong- term care benefits. It is also necessary to provide for specific provisions in case of overlapping of long-term care benefits in kind and in cash.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 35a
(35a) Family benefits in cash intended to replace income or grant additional during a periods of child- raising are individual rights which are personal to the parent subject to the legislation of the competent Member State. Given the specific nature of these family benefits, such benefits should be listed in Part I of Annex XIII to this Regulation and should be exclusively reserved to the parent concerned. The Member State with secondary competence may elect that the rules of priority in the case of overlapping of rights to family benefits under the legislation of the competent Member State and under the legislation of the Member State of residence of members of the family should not apply to such benefits. Where a Member State chooses to disapply the priority rules it must do so consistently in respect of all entitled persons in an analogous situation and be listed in Part II of Annex XIII. (Article 1- paragraph 6)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 207 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point c
(a) In Point (c) the term “Title III, Chapters 1 and 3” is replaced by the term “Title III, Chapters 1, 1a and 3”.is replaced by the following: “(c) ‘insured person’, in relation to the social security branches covered by Title III, Chapters 1 and 3, means any person satisfying the conditions required under the legislation of the Member State competent under Title II to have the right to benefits for at least one of the risks covered by the Chapter which has to be applied, in accordance with this Regulation.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point i – point 1 – point ii
(b) In Ppoint (i)(1)(ii) after the term “Title III, Chapter 1 on sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits” the term “and Chapter 1a on long-term care benefits” is inserted., point (ii) is replaced by the following: "(ii) with regard to benefits in kind pursuant to Title III, Chapter 1 any person defined or recognised as a member of the family or designated as a member of the household by the legislation of the Member State in which he/she resides;”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point va – point i
(c) In Point (va)(i) after the term “, point (i) is replaced by the following: “(i) for the purposes of Title III, Chapter 1, with regard to (sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits),” the term “and Chapter 1a (long-term care benefits)” is inserted and the last sentence is deleted., (sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits), benefits in kind provided for under the legislation of a Member State which are intended to supply, make available, pay directly or reimburse the cost of medical care and products and services ancillary to that care. This includes long-term care benefits in kind within the meaning of point (vb) of this point.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point d
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 1 – point vb
(vb) “long-term care benefit” means any benefit in kind, cash or a combination of both for persons who, over an extended period of time, on account of old-age, disability, illness or or in cash, the purpose of which is to address the care needs of a person who, on account of impairment, require considerables assistance from another person or persons to carry out essential daily activities, including of daily living for an extended period of time in order to support this/heir personal autonomy; this includes benefits granted to or forfor the same purpose to the person providing such assistance;
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) sickness benefits; (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)9a. In Article 3(1), point (a) is replaced by the following: “(a) sickness and long-term care benefits;” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point ba
10. In Article 3(1), the following point is inserted after point (b): ‘(ba) long-term care benefits;’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 239 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may require that the access of an economically inactive person residing in that Member State to its social security benefits be subject to the conditions of having a right to legal residence as set out in Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.44. __________________ 44deleted OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 11 – paragraph 2
(a) In pParagraph 2 the term “sickness benefits in cash covering treatment for an unis replaced by the following: “2. For the purposes of this Title, persons receiving cash benefits because or as a consequence of their activity as an employed or self-employed person shall be considered to be pursuing the said activity. This shall not apply to invalimdited period” is replaced by the term “y, old age or survivors’ pensions or to pensions in respect of accidents at work or occupational diseases or to long-term care benefits in cash”. paid to the person in need of care.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. A person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services46 or sent by that employer to another Member State to perform work on that employer’s behalf, shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such work does not exceed 24 months and that the person is not posted or sent to replace another employed or self-employed person previously posted or sent within the meaning of this Article. __________________ 46 OJ L 018, 21.01.1997 p. 1person sent previously by this employer within the meaning of this Article.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. A person who normally pursues an activity as a self-employed person in a Member State who goes to pursue a similar activity in another Member State shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such activity does not exceed 24 months and that the person is not replacing another posted employed or self-employed person..
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where an employed person covered by paragraph 1 does not complete the task or activity foreseen in the contract and is replaced by the same employer by another sent person to complete the work, the person replacing the previously sent person shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the Member State from which he/ she is sent provided that the total duration of work of that person does not exceed 24 months.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. After the end of a posting as referred to in paragraph 1, the employed person concerned shall not be posted by the same undertaking to the same Member State until two months after the end of the previous posting. In exceptional circumstances, an undertaking may apply to the competent authority for a derogation from the first subparagraph.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 302 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Title III – Chapter 1 – title
Sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits 14a. In Title III, the title of Chapter 1 is replaced by the following: “Sickness, long-term care, maternity and equivalent paternity benefits” Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883R(01)&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 19
14 c. Article 19 is replaced by the following: “Article 19 Stay outside the competent Member State 1. Unless otherwise provided for by paragraph 2, an insured person and the members of his or her family staying in a Member State other than the competent Member State shall be entitled to the benefits in kind which become necessary on medical grounds or due to the need for long-term care during their stay, taking into account the nature of the benefits and the expected length of the stay. These benefits shall be provided on behalf of the competent institution by the institution of the place of stay, in accordance with the provisions of the legislation it applies, as though the persons concerned were insured under the said legislation.< 2. The Administrative Commission shall establish a list of benefits in kind which, in order to be provided during a stay in another Member State, require for practical reasons a prior agreement between the person concerned and the institution providing the care. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)benefit.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 308 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 d (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 20 – title
14d. In Article 20, the title is replaced by the following: “Travel with the purpose of receiving benefits in kind - Authorisation to receive appropriate treatment and long-term care outside the Member State of residence (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 e (new)
14e. In Article 20, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: “2. An insured person who is authorised by the competent institution to go to another Member State with the purpose of receiving the treatment or long- term care appropriate to his or her condition shall receive the benefits in kind provided, on behalf of the competent institution, by the institution of the place of stay, in accordance with the provisions of the legislation it applies, as though he or she were insured under the said legislation. The authorisation shall be accorded where the treatment or long-term care in question is among the benefits provided for by the legislation in the Member State where the person concerned resides and where he or she cannot be given such treatment within a time- limit which is medically justifiable, taking into account his or her current state of health and the probable course of his illness. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)or her illness or within a time limit which is justifiable, taking into account his or her current state of need of long-term care and the probable course of his or her need of long-term care.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 311 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 g (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 25
14g. Article 25 is replaced by the following: “Article 25 Pensions under the legislation of one or more Member States other than the Member State of residence, where there is a right to benefits in kind in the latter Member State Where the person receiving a pension or pensions under the legislation of one or more Member States resides in a Member State under whose legislation the right to receive benefits in kind is not subject to conditions of insurance, or of activity as an employed or self-employed person, and no pension is received from that Member State, the cost of benefits in kind provided to him/her and to members of his/her family shall be borne by the Institution of one of the Member States competent in respect of his/her pensions determined in accordance with Article 24(2), to the extent that the pensioner and the members of his/her Family would be entitled to such benefits if they resided in that Member State. ” Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883R(01)&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 i (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 27 – title
14i. In Article 27, the title is replaced by the following: “Stay of the pensioner or the members of his family in a Member State other than the Member State in which they reside – Stay in the competent Member State – Authorisation for appropriate treatment or long-term care outside the Member State of residence (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 314 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 j (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 27 – paragraph 2
14j. In Article 27, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: “3. Article 20 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a pensioner and/or the members of his family who are staying in a Member State other than the one in which they reside with the purpose of receiving there the treatment or long-term care appropriate to their condition. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 l (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. A frontier worker who retires4l. In Article 28(1), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: “1. A frontier worker who retires because of old-age or invalidity is entitled in casethe event of sickness or the need for long-term care to continue to receive benefits in kind in the Member State where he/she last pursued his or her activity as an employed or self-employed person, in so far as this is a continuation of treatment or long-term care which began in that Member State. The term" "continuation of treatment" means the continued investigation, diagnosis and treatment of an illness for its entire duration. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)The term "continuation of long-term care" means the continued granting of long-term care benefits in kind due to the need of care which was established before retirement and which continues beyond that date.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 321 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 m (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 30
14m. Article 30 is replaced by the following: “Article 30 Contributions by pensioners 1. The institution of a Member State which is responsible under the legislation it applies for making deductions in respect of contributions for sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity and long-term care benefits, may request and recover such deductions, calculated in accordance with the legislation it applies, only to the extent that the cost of the benefits pursuant to Articles 23 to 26 is to be borne by an institution of the said Member State. 2. Where, in the cases referred to in Article 25, the acquisition of sickness, maternity and equivalent paternity and long-term care benefits is subject to the payment of contributions or similar payments under the legislation of a Member State in which the pensioner concerned resides, these contributions shall not be payable by virtue of such residence. ” Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883R(01)&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 327 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – point a – point i
(i) rights available on the basis of an activity as an employed or self-employed person of the insured person, including rights existing in the application of Article 11(2) or (3)(c);
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 33 a (new)
15a. The following article is inserted: “Article 33a Long-term care benefits 1. The Administrative Commission shall draw up a detailed list of long-term care benefits which meet the criteria laid down in point (vi) of Article 1, specifying which are benefits in kind and which are benefits in cash, and whether the benefit is provided to the person in need of care or to the person providing such care. 2. Where a long-term care benefit falling under this Chapter also has the characteristics of benefits coordinated under another Chapter in Title III, Member States may, by way of derogation from paragraph 1, coordinate such benefits in accordance with the rules laid down in that other Chapter, specifying which Chapter applies, provided that: (a) the outcome of such coordination is at least as favourable to the beneficiaries as it would have been had the benefit been coordinated as a long- term care benefit under this Chapter; and (b) the long-term care benefit is listed in Annex XY. 3. With regard to benefits listed in Annex XII, Article 34(1) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 332 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34
16. Article 34 is deleted.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 337 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. If a recipient of long-term care benefits in cash, which have to be treated as sickness benefits and are therefore provided by the Member State competent for cash benefits6a. In Article 34, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “1. If a recipient of long-term care benefits in cash, which is provided under Articles 21 or 29, is, at the same time and under this Chapter, entitled to claim benefits in kind intended for the same purpose from the institution of the place of residence or stay in another Member State, and an institution in the first Member State is also required to reimburse the cost of theose benefits in kind under Article 35, the general provision on prevention of overlapping of benefits laid down in Article 10 shall be applicable, with the following restriction only: if the person concerned claims and receives the benefit in kind, the amount of the benefit in cash shall be reduced by the amount of the benefit in kind which is or could be claimed from the institution of the first Member State required to reimburse the cost. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 2
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)16b. In Article 34, paragraph 2 is deleted. Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 34 – paragraph 3 c (new)
(http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)16c. In Article 34, the following paragraph is added: “3a. The Member State in which the institution responsible for meeting the cost of benefits in kind is situated shall be responsible for providing long-term care benefits in cash.” Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 342 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Chapter 1 a
17. After Article 35, the following Chapter is inserted: ‘CHAPTER 1a Long-term care benefits Article 35a General provisions 1. Without prejudice to the specific provisions of this Chapter, Articles 17 to 32 shall apply mutatis mutandis to long- term care benefits. 2. shall draw up a detailed list of long-term care benefits which meet the criteria contained in Article 1 (vb) of this Regulation, specifying which are benefits in kind and which are benefits in cash. 3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may grant long-term care benefits in cash in accordance with the other Chapters of Title III, if the benefit and the specific conditions to which the benefit is subject are listed in Annex XII and provided that the outcome of such coordination is at least as favourable for the beneficiaries as if the benefit was coordinated under this Chapter. Article 35b Overlapping of long-term care benefits 1. benefits in cash granted under the legislation of the competent Member State receives, at the same time and under this Chapter, long-term care benefits in kind from the institution of the place of residence or stay in another Member State, and an institution in the first Member State is also required to reimburse the cost of these benefits in kind under Article 35c, the general provision on prevention of overlapping of benefits laid down in Article 10deleted The Administrative Commission If a recipient of long-term care Two or more Member States, or Article 35 shall be applicable, with the following restriction only: the amount of the benefit in cash shall be reduced by the reimbursable amount for the benefit in kind which is claimable under Article 35c from the institution of the first Member State. 2. their competent authorities, may agree on other or supplementary measures which shall not be less favourable for the persons concerned than the principles laid down in paragraph 1. Article 35c Reimbursement between institutions 1. mutandis to long-term care benefits. 2. State where the competent institution under this Chapter is situated does not provide for long-term care benefits in kind, the institution which is or would be competent in that Member State under Chapter 1 for the reimbursement of sickness benefits in kind granted in another Member State shall be deemed to be the competent one also under Chapter 1a.. ’y mutatis If the legislation of a Member
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 351 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61
19. Article 61 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 61 Special rules on aggregation of periods of insurance, employment or self- employment 1. Article 65(2), the application of Article 6 shall be conditional on the person concerned having most recently completed a period of at least three months of insurance, employment, or self- employment in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed. 2. not satisfy the conditions for the aggregation of periods in accordance with paragraph 1 because the total duration of his or her most recently completed periods of insurance, employment or self- employment in that Member State is less than three months that person shall be entitled to unemployment benefits in accordance with the legislation of the Member State where he or she had previously completed such periods under the conditions and subject to the limitations laid down in Article 64a. ’deleted Except in the cases referred to in Where an unemployed person does
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 356 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 1
1. Except in the cases referred to in Article 65(2), the application of Article 6 shall beThe competent institution of a Member State whose legislation makes the acquisition, retention, recovery or duration of the right to benefits conditional upon the person concerned having most recently completed a period of at least three monthcompletion of either periods of insurance, employment or self- employment shall, to the extent necessary, take into account periods of insurance, employment, or self- employment in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)completed under the legislation of any other Member State as though they were completed under the legislation it applies. However, where, under the applicable legislation, the right to benefits is conditional on the completion of periods of insurance, the periods completed under the legislation of another Member State shall be taken into account only if those periods would qualify for the purposes of establishing entitlement to unemployment benefits in the Member State under whose legislation they were completed. Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 360 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 1
1. Except in the cases referred to in Article 65(2), the application of Article 6 shall be conditional on the person concerned having most recently completed a period of at least three monthsone day of insurance, employment, or self- employment in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 61 – paragraph 2
2. Where an unemployed person does not satisfy the conditions for the aggregation of periods in accordance with paragraph 1 because the total duration of his or her most recently completed periods of insurance, employment or self- employmentExcept in the cases referred to in Article 65(5)(a), the application of paragraph 1 of this Article shall be conditional on the person concerned having the most recently completed, in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed: – periods of insurance of at least one day, inf that Member State is less than three months that person shall be entitled to unemployment benefits in accordance with the legislation of the Member State where he or she had previously completed such periods under the conditions and subject to the limitations laid down in Article 64a. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN)legislation requires periods of insurance, – periods of employment of at least one day, if that legislation requires periods of employment, or – periods of self-employment of at least one day, if that legislation requires periods of self-employment. Or. en
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 405 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 64a
21. After Article 64, the following Article 64a shall be inserted: ‘Article 64a Special rules for unemployed persons who moved to another Member State without fulfilling the conditions of Article 61(1) and Article 64 In the situations referred to in Article 61(2), the Member State to whose legislation the unemployed person was previously subject shall become competent to provide unemployment benefits. They shall be provided at the expense of the competent institution for the period laid down in Article 64(1)(c), if the unemployed person makes himself/herself available to the employment services in the Member State of most recent insurance and adheres to the conditions laid down under the legislation of that Member State. Article 64 (2) to (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis. ’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 449 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 68b – paragraph 1
1. Family benefits in cash which are intended to replace or grand additional income during periods of child-raising and which are listed in Part 1 of Annex XIII shall be awarded solely to the person subject to the legislation of the competent Member State and there shall be no derived right for his or her family members to such benefits. Article 68a of this Regulation shall not apply to such benefits nor shall the competent institution be required to take into account a claim submitted by the other parent, a person treated as a parent or institution acting as guardian of the child or children pursuant to Article 60(1) of the Implementing Regulation. (Article 1- paragraph 23)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 512 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 1 – point 2 – point e a
(ea) ‘fraud’ means any intentional act or omission to act, in order to obtain or receive social security benefits or to avoid to pay social security contributions, contrary to the provisions of the basic Regulation and the implementing Regulation or the law of a Member State;.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 514 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
(eb) ‘error’ means unintentional wrong conduct or unintentional omission on the part of an institution or of a person falling within the scope of the basic Regulation and the implementing Regulation;
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 515 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. When a person's rights or obligations to which the basic and implementing Regulations apply have been established or determined, the competent institution may request the institution in the Member State of residence or stay to providetransmit personal data about that person. within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The request and any response shall concern information which enables the competent Member State to identify any inaccuracyconsistencies in the facts on which a document or a decision determining the rights and obligations of a person under the basic or implementing Regulation is based. The request can also be madetransmitted where there is no existing doubt about the validity or accuracy of the information contained in the document or on which the decision is based in a particular case, but the information shall be required in accordance with the legislation applicable to the competent institution. The request for information and any response must be necessary and proportionate.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 522 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Documents issued by the institution of a Member State and showing the position of a person for the purposes of the application of the basic Regulation and of the implementing Regulation, and supporting evidence on the basis of which the documents have been issued, shall be accepted by the institutions of the other Member States for as long as they have not been withdrawn or declared to be invalid by the Member State in which they were issued. Such documents shall only be valid ifWhere not all sections indicated as compulsory are filled in, the receiving institution shall without delay notify the issuing institution, which should take the appropriate action.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 525 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where there is doubt about the validity of a document or the accuracy of the facts on which they are based, the institution of the Member State that receives the document shall ask the issuing institution for the necessary clarification and, where appropriate, the withdrawal of that document, clearly stating the grounds and presenting all the supporting evidence of doubt.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 526 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) When receiving such a request, the issuing institution shall reconsider the grounds for issuing the document and, if necessary, withdraw it or rectify it, within 25 working day shall inform the competent institutions of the Member States concerned of the result within three months from the receipt of the request. Upon detection of an irrefutable case of fraud committed by the applicant of the document, the issuing institutionrmination that the applicable law was incorrectly certified, the certificate shall be withdrawn or rectify the document immediately and with retroactive effectied, whereby the legislation applicable in the issuing Member State shall be complied with. This shall also be applied to previous periods.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 527 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5– paragraph 2 – point a
(a) When receiving such aa reasoned request, the issuing institution shall reconsider the grounds for issuing the document and, if necessary, withdraw it or rectify it, within 25 working days from the receipt of the request. Upon detection of an irrefutable case of fraud committed by the applicant of the document, the issuing institution shall withdraw or rectify the document immediately and with retroactive effect.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 532 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5– paragraph 2 – point b
(b) If the issuing institution, having reconsidered the grounds for issuing the document is unable todoes not detect any error it shall forward to the requesting institution all supporting evidence within 25 working days from the receipt of the request. In urgent cases, where the reasons for urgency have been clearly indicatedproven in the request, thise validity of the document shall be dconefirmed within two working days from the receipt of the request, notwithstanding that the issuing institution may not have completed its deliberations pursuant to subparagraph (a) above.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 535 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) Where the requesting institution having received the supporting evidence continues to have doubts about the validity of a document or the accuracy of the facts on which the particulars contained therein are based that the information upon which the document was issued is not correct, it may submit evidence to that effect and make a further request for clarification and where appropriate the withdrawal of that document by the issuing institution in accordance within the procedure and timeframes set out above.and the requesting institution and the issuing institution are not able to come to an agreement, they shall make use of the dialogue and conciliation procedure set out in Decision No A11a. . __________________ 1a. Decision No A2 of 12 June 2009 concerning the interpretation of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legislation applicable to posted workers and self-employed workers temporarily working outside the competent State (OJ C 106, 24.4.2010, p. 5).
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 539 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5– paragraph 2 – point c a new
(ca) Forwarding the supporting evidence shall not lead to disclosure of company's secrets or violate the protection of personal data.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 553 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. For the purposes of the application of Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation, a ‘person who pursues an activity as an employed person in a Member State on behalf of an employer which normally carries out its activities there and who is posted within the meaning of the Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services52 or sent by that employer to another Member State’ shall include a person who is recruited with a view to being posted or sent to another Member State, provided that immediately before the start of his employment, the person concerned is already subject to the legislation of the sending Member State in accordance with Title II of the basic Regulation.. __________________ 52OJ L 018 , 21.01.1997 p. 1.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 561 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Once a person has been sent in accordance with Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation or pursues an activity as a self-employed person in another Member State in accordance with Article 12(2) of the basic Regulation for a total of 24 months, either continuously or with interruptions of not longer than two months, no new period under Article 12(1) or (2) for the same employed or self- employed person in the same Member State shall start until at least two months have elapsed from the end of the previous period. Undertakings may derogate from the first subparagraph in specific circumstances.”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 570 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 5a
5a. For the purpose of the application of Title II of the basic Regulation, ‘registered office or place of business’ shall refer to the registered office or place of business where the essential decisions of the undertaking are adopted and where the functions of its central administration are carried out, provided the undertaking performs a substantial activity in that Member State. Otherwise, it shall be deemed to be situated in the Member State where the centre of interest of activities of the undertaking determined in accordance with the criteria laid down in paragraphs 9 and 10 is located.. In determining the location of the "registered office or place of business" the following factors shall be taken into account in an overall assessment: (a) the place of residence of the main directors; (b) the places where general meetings are held; (c) the place where administrative and accounting documents are kept; (d) the place where financial and particularly transactions mainly take place; (e) the habitual nature of the activity pursued. The determination shall be carried out in the framework of an overall assessment giving due eight to each of the criteria mentioned above.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 575 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 12
12. If a person who resides outside the territory of the Union pursues his activities as an employed or self-employed person in two or more Member States and if this person, by virtue of the national legislation of one of those Member States, is subject to the legislation of that State, the provisions of the basic Regulation and the implementing Regulation on the determination of the applicable legislation shall apply mutatis mutandis subject to the proviso that his or her residence shall be deemed to be in the Member State where the registered office or place of business of the undertaking or his or her employer or the centre of interest of his or her activities as self-employed person is located..
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 582 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. If that institution determines that the legislation of another Member State applies, it shall do so provisionally and shall without delay inform the institution of the Member State which it considers to be competent of this provisional decision. The decision shall become definitive within two months after the institution designated by the competent authorities of the Member State concerned has been informed of it, unless the latter institution informs the first institution and the persons and the employers concerned that it cannot yet accept the provisional determination or that it takes a different view on this.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 587 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 19 – paragraph 2
10a. In Article 19, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. At the request of the person concerned or of the employer, the competent institution of the Member State whose legislation is applicable pursuant to Title II of the basic Regulation shall provide an attestation that such legislation is applicable and shall indicate, where appropriate, until what date and under what conditions. As of 1 July 2019, at the latest, such an attestation shall be made solely in the form of the Structured Electronic Document referred to in point (d) of Article 1(2) of the implementing Regulation and using the Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information — EESSI referred to in the third subparagraph of Article 95(1) of the implementing Regulation. Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1515592051048&uri=CELEX:02009R0987-20170411)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 594 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 20a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementing acts specifying the procedure to be followed in order to ensure uniform conditions for the application of Articles 12 and 13 of the basic Regulation. Those acts shall establish a standard procedure includingfor the issuing institution with regard to time limits for:
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 611 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 24 – paragraph 3
15. In Article 24(3), the term "and 26" is replaced by ", 26 and 35a".deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 616 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 25 – paragraph 1
15a. In Article 25, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. For the purposes of the application of Article 19 of the basic Regulation, the insured person shall present to the health care or long-term care provider in the Member State of stay a document issued by the competent institution indicating his entitlement to benefits in kind. If the insured person does not have such a document, the institution of the place of stay, upon request or if otherwise necessary, shall contact the competent institution in order to obtain one. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 619 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 25 – paragraph 3
15b. In Article 25, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: "3. The benefits in kind referred to in Article 19(1) of the basic Regulation shall refer to the benefits in kind which are provided in the Member State of stay, in accordance with its legislation, and which become necessary on medical grounds or due to the need for long-term care with a view to preventing an insured person from being forced to return, before the end of the planned duration of stay, to the competent Member State to obtain the necessary treatment. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 621 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 26
15c. Article 26 is replaced by the following: "Article 26 Scheduled treatment A. Authorisation procedure 1. For the purposes of the application of Article 20(1) of the basic Regulation, the insured person shall present a document issued by the competent institution to the institution of the place of stay. For the purposes of this Article, the competent institution shall mean the institution which bears the cost of the scheduled treatment or long-term care; in the cases referred to in Article 20(4) and 27(5) of the basic Regulation, in which the benefits in kind provided in the Member State of residence are reimbursed on the basis of fixed amounts, the competent institution shall mean the institution of the place of residence. 2. If an insured person does not reside in the competent Member State, he shall request authorisation from the institution of the place of residence, which shall forward it to the competent institution without delay. In that event, the institution of the place of residence shall certify in a statement whether the conditions set out in the second sentence of Article 20(2) of the basic Regulation are met in the Member State of residence. The competent institution may refuse to grant the requested authorisation only if, in accordance with the assessment of the institution of the place of residence, the conditions set out in the second sentence of Article 20(2) of the basic Regulation are not met in the Member State of residence of the insured person, or if the same treatment or long-term care can be provided in the competent Member State itself, within a time-limit which is medically justifiable, taking into account the current state of healthneed of long-term care and the probable course of illnessneed of long- term care of the person concerned. The competent institution shall inform the institution of the place of residence of its decision. In the absence of a reply within the deadlines set by its national legislation, the authorisation shall be considered to have been granted by the competent institution. 3. If an insured person who does not reside in the competent Member State is in need of urgent vitally necessary treatment, and the authorisation cannot be refused in accordance with the second sentence of Article 20(2) of the basic Regulation, the authorisation shall be granted by the institution of the place of residence on behalf of the competent institution, which shall be immediately informed by the institution of the place of residence. The competent institution shall accept the findings and the treatment options of the doctors approved by the institution of the place of residence that issues the authorisation, concerning the need for urgent vitally necessary treatment. 4. At any time during the procedure granting the authorisation, the competent institution shall retain the right to have the insured person examined by a doctor of its own choice or, in the case of the need for long-term care, by a doctor or another expert of its own choice in the Member State of stay or residence. 5. The institution of the place of stay shall, without prejudice to any decision regarding authorisation, inform the competent institution if it appears medically appropriate to supplement the treatment covered by the existing authorisation. B. Meeting the cost of benefits in kind incurred by the insured persor appropriate taking into account the current state of need for long-term care to supplement the treatment or long-term care covered by the existing authorisation. B. Meeting the cost of benefits in kind incurred by the insured person 6. Without prejudice to paragraph 7, Article 25(4) and (5) of the implementing Regulation shall apply mutatis mutandis. 7. If the insured person has actually borne all or part of the costs for the authorised medical treatment or long-term care him or herself and the costs which the competent institution is obliged to reimburse to the institution of the place of stay or to the insured person according to paragraph 6 (actual cost) are lower than the costs which it would have had to assume for the same treatment or long-term care in the competent Member State (notional cost), the competent institution shall reimburse, upon request, the cost of treatment or long-term care incurred by the insured person up to the amount by which the notional cost exceeds the actual cost. The reimbursed sum may not, however, exceed the costs actually incurred by the insured person and may take account of the amount which the insured person would have had to pay if the treatment or long-term care had been delivered in the competent Member State. C. Meeting the costs of travel and stay as part of scheduled treatment or long-term care 8. Where the national legislation of the competent institution provides for the reimbursement of the costs of travel and stay which are inseparable from the treatment or long-term care of the insured person, such costs for the person concerned and, if necessary, for a person who must accompany him/her, shall be assumed by this institution when an authorisation is granted in the case of treatment or long- term care in another Member State. D. Family members 9. Paragraphs 1 to 8 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of the family of the insured persons. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 623 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 28 – paragraph 1
16. In Article 28(1), after the term "pursuant to Article 21(1) of the basic Regulation", the following term is added "in accordance with Article 35a thereof".deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 626 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 31 – title and paragraphs 1 and 2
17. Article 31 is amended as follows: (c) following title: ‘Application of Article 35b of the basic Regulation; ’ (d) 34" is replaced by "Article 35b"; (e)deleted The title is replaced by the In paragraph (2)1, the term "Article 34(2)" is replaced by "Article 35a (2)".
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 632 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 32 – paragraph 1
17a. In Article 32, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. When a person or a group of persons are exempted upon request from compulsory sickness or long-term care insurance and such persons are thus not covered by a sickness insurance scheme to which the basic Regulation applies, the institution of another Member State shall not, solely because of this exemption, become responsible for bearing the costs of benefits in kind or in cash provided to such persons or to a member of their family under Title III, Chapter I, of the basic Regulation. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 637 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 55 – paragraph 7
21. In paragraph 7 of Article 55, the term “Article 65a(3)” is replaced by “Article 64a and Article 65a(3)”deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 640 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 55a
22. The following Article 55a is inserted after Article 55: ‘Article 55a Obligation of employment service of the Member State of most recent insurance In the situation referred to in Article 61(2) of the basic Regulation, the institution of the Member State of most recent insurance shall immediately send a document to the competent institution of the Member State of previous insurance containing: the date on which the person concerned had become unemployed, the period of insurance, employment or self- employment completed under its legislation, the relevant circumstances of the unemployment likely to affect entitlement to benefits, the date of registration as unemployed person and their address.. ’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 646 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Title VI – Chapter I – title
24. Chapter 1 of Title IV is renamed as follows: ‘CHAPTER I Reimbursement of the cost of benefits in application of Article 35, 35c and Article 41 of the basic Regulation’deleted
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 648 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 65 – paragraph 1
1. The annual average cost per person in each age group for a specific year shall be notified to the Audit Board at the latest by the end of the second year following the year in question, with sickness and long- term care benefits in kind indicated separately.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 649 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 66 – paragraph 2
26a. In Article 66, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. The reimbursements between the institutions of the Member States, provided for in Articles 35 and 41 of the basic Regulation, shall be made via the liaison body. There may be a separate liaison body for reimbursements under Articles 35 and Article 41 of the basic Regulation. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- Mutual claims shall be off-set between the liaison bodies. The Administrative Commission shall establish detailed arrangements for such off-setting. " Or. en 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 650 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 67 – paragraph 1
26b. In Article 67, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. Claims based on actual expenditure shall be introduced to the liaison body of the debtor Member State within 12 months of the end of the calendar half-year during which those claims were recorded in the accounts of the creditor institution. Claims shall be met, where possible, within one month, and in any event within six months, of the claim. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 651 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 67 – paragraph 3
3. In the case referred to in Article 6(5) second subparagraph of the implementing Regulation, the deadline set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall not start before the competent institution has been identified. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987-26c. In Article 67, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: "3. The period referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not commence until the date on which the creditor institution becomes aware of the claim of the debtor institution. Claims may be introduced for benefit periods of no more than the previous five calendar years. The introduction of claims to the liaison body of the debtor Member State shall be decisive.” Or. en 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 652 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 e (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 67 – paragraph 5
26e. In Article 67, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following: "5. The claims shall be paid to the liaison body of the creditor Member State referred to in Article 66 of the implementing Regulation by the debtor institution within 18 months of the end of the month during which they were introduced to the liaison body of the debtor Member State. This does not apply to the claims which the debtor institution has rejected for a relevant reason within that period. The liaison body of the creditor Member State shall reply to such a rejection within 12 months of the end of the month during which the rejection was received. In the absence of such a reply, the rejection shall be deemed to be accepted. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 654 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 f (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 67 – paragraph 7
26f. In Article 67, paragraph 7 is replaced by the following: "7. The Audit Board shall facilitate the final closing of accounts in cases where a settlement cannot be reached within the period set out in paragraph 6, and, upon a reasoned request by one of the parties, shall give its opinion on a dispute within sixnine months following the month in which the matter was referred to it. The Audit Board shall receive the request no later than nine months after expiry of the period set out in paragraph 6. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 656 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 g (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 68 – paragraph 2
26g. In Article 68, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. The interest shall be calculated on the basis of the reference rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations plus eight percentage points. The reference rate applicable shall be that in force on the first day of the month on which the payment is due. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32009R0987)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 660 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 73 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In case of a retroactive change of the applicable legislation including situations referred to in Article 6(4) and (5) of the implementing Regulation, at the latest threesix months after the applicable legislation has been determined or the institution responsible for paying the benefits has been identified, the institution which unduly paid cash benefits shall draw up a statement of the amount paid and shall send it to the institution identified as being competent for the purpose of their reimbursement.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 661 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
If the amount of unduly paid contributions exceeds the amount the legal and/or natural person owes to the institution identified as being competent, the institution which unduly received contributions shall reimburse the amount in excess to the legal and/or natural person concerned. in accordance with national law.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 662 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 73 – paragraph 4
4. The existence of time limits and application procedures under national legislation shall not be a valid ground for the refusal of the settlement of claims between institutions under this Article.
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 682 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 39
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 85 a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By agreement between the applicant party and the requested party and in accordance with the arrangements laid down by the requested party resulting from existing national law or practice, officials authorised by the applicant party may, with a view to promoting mutual assistance provided for in this Section:
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 685 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 39 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 86
39a. Article 86 is replaced by the following: "Article 86 Review clause 1. No later than the fourth full calendarwo years after the entry into force of the implementing Regulationexpiry of the transitional period referred to in Article 95, the Administrative Commission shall present a comparative report on the time limits set out in Article 67(2), (5) and (6) of the implementing Regulation. On the basis of this report, the European Commission may, as appropriate, submit proposals to review these time limits with the aim of reducing them in a significant way. 2. No later than the date referred to in paragraph 1, the Administrative Commission shall also assess the rules for conversion of periods set out in Article 13 with a view to simplifying those rules, if possible. 3. Administrative Commission shall present a report specifically assessing the application of Chapters I and III of Title IV ofThe report shall include a review of when settlement on the basis of fixed amounts, as referred to in Section 2 of Chapter I of Title IV, can be deleted. On the basis of this report, the Commission may, as appropriate, submit proposals to shorten those timplementing Regulation, in particular with regard to the procedures and time limits referred to in Article 67(2), (5) and (6) of the implementing Regulation and to the recovery procedures referred to in Articles 75 to 85 of the implementing Regulation. In the light of this report, the European Commission may, if necessary, submit appropriate proposals to make these procedures more efficient and balanced. e limits as well as a proposal to delete Section 2 of Chapter I of Title IV. " No later than 1 May 2015, the Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009R0987- 20170411&from=EN)
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 687 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 40 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 87 – paragraph 6
However, if the institution which was requested to carry out the check also uses the findings for the granting of benefits on its own account to the person concerned under the legislation it applies, it shall not claim the expenses referred to in the previous sentence..
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 696 #

2016/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 7 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Annex XIII a (new)
7a. The following annex is added: “Annex XIIIa Long-term care benefits in cash provided in derogation from Article 33a(a) of Chapter I (Article 33a(2))”
2018/01/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 on the basis of a feasibility study to amend the detailed topics listed in Annex I so as to reflect relevant technical, social and economic developments and respond to the new needs of users. In exercising this power, the Commission shall ensure that:
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The adaptations of the planning referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made no later than 2430 months before the beginning of the each data collection period, as specified in the planning. These adaptations shall aim to ensure effectiveness and consistency of the planning with users’ needs.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 254 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
In case there is no opinion issued by the European Statistical System Committee, the Commission shall not adopt a delegated act with regards to this particular matter.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 – point a
(a) The sample shall have a minimum sixfour-year rotation scheme.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) analyse skills and qualification needs with regard to robotisation and automotisation and new forms of employment;
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2016/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) facilitate exchange of best practices among Member States and relevant national public and private institutions;
2017/03/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2016/0205(NLE)

Draft opinion
Article 1
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to recommend that Parliament decline to give its consent to the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part;.
2016/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The binding occupational limit values should be reviewed regularly and at least every 5 years and revised when necessary in the light of scientific data. This revision should duly take into account the recommendations and opinions of the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) and the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at work (ACSH) which is composed of three full members per Member State, representing national governments, trade unions and employers' organisations.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 c (new)
(2c) There is no harmonised methodology for measuring workers' exposure to carcinogens, mutagens and substances that are toxic for reproduction at European level. The European Commission should shortly develop such an EU methodology in order to ensure on the one hand, similar and high-level protection for workers and on the other hand, a level playing field.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 d (new)
(2d) More transparency on health risks incurred by workers should be provided by including two new columns to Annex III in order to indicate the residual cancer risk associated with each Binding Occupational Exposure Limit and the date of the last estimation.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at work also assists the Commission, by giving for instance opinions on the Occupational Exposure Limits which should be set at EU level pursuant to Council Directive 98/24/EC and Directive 2004/37/EC in order to protect workers from chemical risks. These opinions are based in particular on the latest available scientific data and socioeconomic impacts.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) More effective and continuous efforts should be made by Member States and all respective partners in order to reduce gradually limits on chromium compounds which are carcinogens.
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2016/0130(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex
Directive 2004/37/EC
Annex III – Part A – row 1 – column 3
Hardwood dusts (5 years after the date of entry into force of the amending directive)
2017/01/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 4
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee5, and the counter- opinion; _________________ 5 OJ C,, p..
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Citation 4 a (new)
Having regard to the reasoned opinions issued by national parliaments from 11 Member States objecting the Commission proposal on the grounds of subsidiarity;
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) The free movement of workers, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services are fundamental principles of the internal market in the Union enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The implementation of those principles is further developed by the Union aimed at enhancing social cohesion among Member States and guaranteeing a level playing field for businesses and respect for the rights of workers.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
(2) The freedom to provide services includes the right of undertakings to provide services in another Member State, to which they may post their own workers temporarily in order to provide those services there. The Treaty provides that restrictions on the freedom to provide services are prohibited.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Almost twenty years after its adoption, it is necessary to assess whetherenforce the rules and confirm that the Posting of Workers Directive still strikes the right balance between the need to promote the freedom to provide services and the need to protect the rights of posted workers.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The Rome I Regulation clarifies also the situation of posted workers as it provides that the country where the work is habitually carried out shall not be deemed to have changed if he is temporarily employed in another country.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the long duration of certain posting assignments, it is necessary to provide that, in case of posting lasting for periods higher than 24 months, the host Member State is deemed to be the country in which the work is carried out. In accordance with the principle of Rome I Regulation, the law of the host Member Sates therefore applies to the employment contract of such posted workers if no other choice of law was made by the parties. In case a different choice was made, it cannot, however, have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement under the law of the host Member State. This should apply from the start of the posting assignment whenever it is envisaged for more than 24 months andshall ensure that undertakings posting workers to their territory guarantee the posted workers additional rights, beside the terms and condition of employment to which they are entitled according to paragraph 1. This should apply from the first day subsequent to the 24 months when it effectively exceeds this duration, unless two Member States concerned agree on derogation. This rule does not affect the right of undertakings posting workers to the territory of another Member State to invoke the freedom to provide services in circumstances also where the posting exceeds 24 months. The purpose is merely to create legal certainty in the application of the Rome I Regulation to a specific situation, without amending that Regulation in any way. The employee will in particular enjoy the protection and benefits pursuant to the Rome I RegulationIn order to take into account characteristics of various sectors, the 24 months should be calculated within the reference period of 36 months. For the purpose of calculating the posting period the concept of "the same task at the same place" is also clearly defined and should be determined taking also into consideration the nature of the service provided and the work to be performed.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) It is settled case law that restrictions to the freedom to provide services are only admissible if justified by overriding reasons in theof public interest and must be proportionate and necessary. The overriding reasons relating to the public interest which have been acknowledged by the Court include the protection of workers and in particular the social protection of workers in the construction industry.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Directive 2014/67/EU on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC provides a number of provisions to make sure that rules on posting of workers are enforced and are respected by all service providers. Article 4 of the enforcement directive provides a list of elements that should be assessed in order to identify the genuine posting and prevent abuse and circumvention.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Because of the highly mobile nature of work in international road transport, the implementation of the posting of workers directive raises particular legal questions and difficulties (especially where the link with the concerned Member State is insufficient). It would be most suitTherefore transport services such as transit, international transport and linked cabotage are excluded forom these challenges to scope of this Directive and should be addressed through sector-specific legislation together with other EU initiatives aimed at improving the functioning of the internal road transport market.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) It is within Member States' competence to set rules on remunerationminimum rates of pay and bonuses and allowances in accordance with their law and practice. However, these national rules on remuneration applied to posted workers must be proportionate, non- discriminatory and justified by the need to protect posted workers and must not disproportionately restrict the cross- border provision of services. Therefore Member States should ensure that workers posted to their territory are entitled to minimum rates of pay as well as specific categories of bonuses and allowances as specified in Article 3.1.(c).
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remuneration (13) The information on minimum rates of pay and applicable bonuses and allowances under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear, up to date and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remuneration on this information on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive. In order to provide more transparency and clarity generally applicable collective agreements should be also accompanied by clear information on applicable smingle website provided for by Article 5 of thimum rates of pay, bonuses and allowances and their method of calculation. Social partners are also obliged to make public all collective agreements, which are applicable according to this Directive. Similarly, foreign subcontractors should be Einforcement Directivemed in writing about terms and conditions of employment that they should apply towards posted workers.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remuneration under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remuneration on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive. It is important for each Member State to ensure that its website works properly and is updated on a regular basis. The Commission should ensure that the addresses of those websites and details of how frequently the sites are updated are available in one place.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Laws, regulations, administrative provisions or collective agreements applicable in Member States may ensure that subcontracting does not confer on undertakings the possibility to avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of employment covering remunerationMember States have the freedom to establish on their territory appropriate measures applicable to local and foreign service providers in order to ensure compliance with the applicable rules concerning posting in case of subcontracting chains. In the case of the construction sector Member States are obliged, by the Directive 2014/67/EU, to introduce appropriate liability measures in order to ensure fair competition and workers’ rights. WThere such rules on remuneration exist at national level, thefore laws, regulations, administrative provisions or universally applicable collective agreements applicable in Member States may apply them in a non- discriminatory mannensure that subcontracting does not confer ton undertakings posting workers to the possibilitsy territory provided that they do not disproportionately restrict the cross-border proviso avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of servicesemployment.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2
(–1) In Article 1, paragraph 2 is amended as follows: "2. This Directive shall not apply to merchant navy undertakings as regards seagoing personnel as well as transport services such as transit, international transport and linked cabotage."
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 281 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – title
Posting exceeding twenty-four monthsHabitual place of work
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 288 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 1
1. When the anticipated or the effective duration of posting exceeds twenty-four months, theA Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be thea country in which his or her work is habitually carried out if he is subject to social security legislation of that country.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 289 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2 a – paragraph 1
1. When the anticipated or the effective duration of posting of an individual worker exceeds twenty-four months, the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be the country in which his or her work is habitually carried ouensure, whatever the law applicable to the employment relationship, that the undertaking referred to in Article 1(1) guarantee workers posted to their territory, in addition to the terms and conditions of employment referred to in paragraph 1 of this article, the terms and conditions of employment covering the following matters which, in the Member State where the work is carried out, are laid down by: – law, regulation or administrative provision, and/ or – by collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable within the meaning of paragraph 8: (a) other mandatory rules relating to work periods and rest periods, in addition to paragraph 1(a); (b) other mandatory rules relating to leave and holidays, in addition to paragraph 1(b); (c) other mandatory rules in addition to paragraph 1 (c); (d) rules on parental and paternal leave. The duration of posting of an individual worker shall be calculated within the reference period of 36 months, with a possibility to refrain from the application of paragraph 1 following an agreement with regards to concrete cases between competent authorities from the two Member States concerned. When a period of two months has elapsed from the date of expiry of the previous posting period, the calculation shall restart.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 320 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, in case of replacement of posted workers performing the same task at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months.deleted
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 323 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, in case of replacement of posted workerscalculating the effective duration of posting of an individual posted worker according to paragraph 1, in case of replacement of that individual posted worker by another worker performing the same task at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 365 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point c
(c) remuneration, including overtime rates; this point does not apply to supplementary occupational retirement pension schemes; the minimum rates of pay, including overtime rates; allowances for work carried out on public holidays and Sundays; sector- specific allowances and bonuses with regards to specific working conditions as well as health and safety; seniority allowances; end of year bonuses; daily allowances including board and lodging allowances with regard to assignment within the Member State to which a worker is posted; this point does not apply to supplementary occupational retirement pension schemes, benefits in kind as well as bonuses and allowances which are not directly paid to posted workers;
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 392 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, remuneration meThe minimum rates of pay as well as bonuses ansd all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatoryowances are defined by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, in the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 412 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
For the purpose of calculating the sums due to a posted worker double payment of applicable bonuses and allowances of equal or similar nature shall be avoided. In case of a conflict a common decision shall be taken jointly by competent authorities of the host and of the home member state. Miscalculation of sums due to a posted worker resulting from wrong or insufficient information published in the single official national website or transmitted to subcontractors in written form shall not be sanctioned. Posted workers shall be entitled to the gross amount which does not have to comply with all the mandatory elements but with the amount required
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 420 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
For the purpose of calculating the sums due to a posted worker double payment of applicable bonuses and allowances of equal or similar nature shall be avoided. In case of a conflict a common decision shall be taken jointly by competent authorities of the host and of the home member state.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 421 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
Miscalculation of sums due to a posted worker resulting from wrong or insufficient information published in the single official national website or transmitted to subcontractors in written form shall not be sanctioned.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 422 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 c (new)
Posted workers shall be entitled to the gross amount which does not have to comply with all the mandatory elements but with the amount required
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 425 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall publish in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration in accordance with point (c)specify in a transparent way minimum rates of pay as well as allowances and bonuses as listed in point (c) that are applicable in their territory. They shall publish this information in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU. In case of universally applicable collective agreements a separate clear information on the applicable minimum rates of pay as well as bonuses and allowances shall be published.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 444 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
In case of subcontracting the national contractors shall be obliged to inform their subcontractors in writing about applicable terms and condition of employment including minimum rates of pay, applicable bonuses and allowances.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 453 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a
(b) The following paragraph is added: 1a. territory of a Member State are obliged by law, regulation, administrative provision or collective agreement, to sub-contract in the context of their contractual obligations only to undertakings that guarantee certain terms and conditions of employment covering remuneration,, the Member State may, on a non– discriminatory and proportionate basis, provide that such undertakings shall be under the same obligation regarding subcontracts with undertakings referred to in Article 1 (1) posting workers to its territory.deleted If undertakings established in the
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) The "Europe 2020 Strategy" proposed by the Commission enables the Union to turn its economy towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, accompanied by high level employment, productivity and social cohesion. Five headline targets, listed under the relevant guidelines, constitute shared objectives which guide the action of the Member States, and take into account their relative starting positions and national circumstances as well as the positions and circumstances of the Union. The European Employment Strategy has the leading role in the implementation of the employment and labour market objectives of the new strategy. However it has to be noted that many Member States are still struggling to meet the Europe 2020 employment, poverty, social exclusion and education targets and that more efforts from national governments and the Commission are needed in order to reach expected results.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The Council is adopting a decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States, which should take into consideration the opinion of the European Parliament.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) The integrated guidelines are in line with the conclusions of the European Council. They give precise guidance to the Member States on defining their National Reform Programmes and implementing reforms, reflecting interdependence and in line with the Stability and Growth Pact. The employment guidelines should form the basis for any country-specific recommendations that the Council may address to the Member States under Article 148(4) of the TFEU, in parallel with the country-specific recommendations addressed to the Member States under Article 121(2) of that Treaty. The employment guidelines should also form the basis for the establishment of the Joint Employment Report sent annually by the Council and the European Commission to the European Council. It should be noted that three employment indicators: activity rate, youth employment and long- term unemployment have been recently included in the macroeconomic imbalance procedure and that the European Parliament in its Resolution of 22 February 2016 on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: Employment and Social Aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016, called for these indicators to trigger an in-depth analysis in the relevant Member States which can result further in economic, labour market and social reforms being suggested and applied.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2016/0043(NLE)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) The examination of the Member States' National Reform Programmes contained in the Joint Employment Report shows that Member States should continue to make every effort to address the priority areas of increasing labour market participation and reducing structural unemployment, generating jobs, supporting well- functioning, dynamic and inclusive labour markets, developing a skilled workforce responding to labour market needs and promoting job quality and lifelong learning, improve the performance of education and training systems at all levels and increasing participation in tertiary education, promoting social inclusion and combating poverty.
2016/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to combat early school-leaving byRecognizes the decrease in the number of early school- leavers, however calls on Member States to continue their efforts to combat this phenomena; underlines the need to focus on providing graduates with at least basic skills and facilitating a more swift transition from school to work by i.e. adequately informing students about future labour market opportunities and qualitative apprenticeships;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that unemployment rates clearly decrease as the level of education attained rises, making it necessary to promote and invest in higher education opportunities for the young people in the EU;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses the fact, that skills mismatch is still one of the main barriers to employment and economic growth; calls on Member States to continue reforming educational systems in order to provide young people with skills sought by labour markets;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that due to the current digitalisation and new trends in the labour market, more and more young people encounter the new forms of employment, balancing between flexibility and security; stresses the importance of an adequate education of youth aimed at emphasizing the importance of social protection mechanisms in career's development;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Erasmus+ programme, thereby fostering further cross-border career anddevelopment and exchange of experience; calls on Member States to promote and monitor the use of EURES in order to enhance intra-EU labour mobility;
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2015/2351(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Youth Guarantee, for example by putting in place career guidance systems and compulsory registration for the unemployedmethods of data collection in order to gain a picture of the real situation as regards youth unemployment; calls on Member States and regions to exchange good practices and learn from each other.
2016/03/29
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the need to promote sustainable growth leading to the creation of more and better jobs and tangible prospects for all, young people in particular, in order to respond to the internal and external challenges facing the EU;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Points out that investment priorities must be oriented to infrastructurale and human capital development projects where these are clearly needed in order to ensure social fairness or enhance sustainable growth; calls on the Commission to require both a prior presentation of the expected social and economic outcomes of any EU-funded investment project and its subsequent monitoring and evaluation;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 377 #

2015/2330(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Points out to the Member States, in view of the ageing of Europe's citizens, the social risk implied in not being able to guarantee the sustainability and effectiveness of social security systems over the coming decades;
2016/01/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that significant differences exist in the times and modalities of processing requests for international protection within Member States; highlights that slow and excessively bureaucratic procedures may hinder refugees’ access to the labour market, as well as the activation of EU programmes and the use of funds in this field; calls therefore on Member States to improve effectiveness of those procedures while at the same time ensure the highest level of safety for refugees and European citizens;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that granfacilitating refugees access to the labour market is important to restoring their human dignity and self- worth and is also cost-efficient, as it would allow them to be self-sufficient and to gain economic independence, which is an essential step for their inclusion into society, and a responsible approach towards public finances, easing the cost borne by Member States while also enabling them to become active fiscal contributors, which is generally considered beneficial for their individual growth, development and self- esteem;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the fact that positive effects of expansive public fiscal policies, covering the extraordinary investments in social inclusion and labour market integration measures and programmes, are likely to have a positive effect on national GDPs in the short term, while medium- or long- term impacts on public finances will depend on the effectiveness of these measures;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls therefore on the Commission to raise the allocation of the European Social Fund to a 25 % share of the cohesion policy budget in the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework11 ; _________________ 11 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/ne ws-room/20131118IPR25534/MEPs- approve-new-cohesion-policy- %E2%82%AC325bn-to-invest-in- Europe’s-regionsand Member States to consider, in the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework, reprogramming and adopting priorities of the European Social Fund in order to take into account the need of effective social inclusion and integration of refugees into the labour market;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 289 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Member States to ensure the swift and full labour market integration and social inclusion of refugees, including access to housing, healthcare and social protection and help in getting access to housing;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls on Member States to grant special care to refugee children, granting them access to education and facilitating their integration with local societies as soon as possible as this will have positive effects in the future;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 354 #

2015/2321(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27b. Calls on Member States to set up information campaigns addressed to refugees in order to inform them about their rights and obligations as well as to citizens to increase their awareness and understanding of the integration process of refugees to local societies and the labour market;
2016/04/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Notes a growing impact on the labour market of the emerging new forms of employment aiming mainly at increasing flexibility for employers and/ or employees, especially in cases of SMSs; calls for an immediate analysis of their impact on working conditions and social protection schemes in the EU;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that apprenticeship schemes within SMEs should be promoted by Member States, including through financial incentives; underlines the importance of trainings for the managers and members of boards;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Underlines the importance and potential of the Internal market for the development and growth of SMEs, through the freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 342 #

2015/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment regarding the implications of the future TTIP agreement and granting China market economy status for jobs in the SME sector in all Member States;
2016/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines that mobility in VET is a great opportunity, especially for young people, to get skills and unique experience they need to be competitive in today's labour markets throughout the EU;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2257(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. NUnderlines that recognition across Member States of learners' achievements and gained competences is key; notes that, despite improvements to the arrangements for the recognition of diplomas, credits, skills certificates, competency accreditations and acquired expertise in the context of VET, a legal basis applicable throughout the EU is needed;
2015/12/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to Articles 151 and 153 of TFEU as well as Article 9 TFEU guaranteeing adequate social protection,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the recently adopted decision on Establishing the European Platform to enhance cooperation in the prevention and deterrence of Undeclared Work,
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. having regard to the increased trend towardsexisting phenomena of undeclared work, and bogus self- employment, outsourcing and subcontracting, which leading to an increase in precarious jobs and deterioratinge levels of worker protection,; having regard to an increasing trend towards outsourcing and subcontracting which may create possibilities to abuse existing labour and social law;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment in case C- 341/05 Laval of 18 December 200710 highlighted on one hand the legitimacy of the struggle against social dumping, and delimitation of respective actions based on the provisions of the Treaty on the other; __________________ 10 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?te xt=&docid=71925&pageIndex=0&doclang =EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1& cid=498309
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. having regard to the fact that there is no legal definition of social dumping which may create confusion with respect to respective recommendations and their application;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
C b. having regard that to the fact that there are different ways on how "social dumping" is being interpreted and that for the purpose for this report social dumping should be considered as "the intended abuse or circumvention of existing European and national laws in order to gain competitive advantage while unlawfully minimising labour and operational costs and not respecting workers' rights;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
C b. having regard to the distinction in the EU law of rules governing the free movement of workers, the right of establishment and the freedom to provide services;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. having regard to the importance of the principle of 'equal pay and social protectioArticle 45 of TFEU stipulating that freedom of movement shall entail the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between fwor the same work at the same place' for all European workers,kers of the Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
D b. having regard to the fact that one of the main principles of EU policies is a social cohesion, which means a constant and ongoing approximation of wages and social security protection guaranteed to all workers, be it local or mobile;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 137 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Dd. Due to a very wide meaning and various possibilities of interpretation of "social dumping" , as well as due to the fact that this term is often being wrongly overused, calls on all relevant stakeholders to limit its use and instead to be more precise and refer to concrete examples of abuse of law;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 151 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive based onEncourages Member States to ratify and implement the ILO Convention No. 81 on labour inspection;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on Member States to increase thsecure appropriate staffing levels and resources ofor their labour inspectorates and their liaison offices, in particular for interpretation and translation and to make sure that inspections are proportionate, justified and non- discriminatory;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on the Member State to swiftly finalise the implementation of the Enforcement Directive on Posting of workers 2014/67/EU and calls on the Commission to closely monitor the transposition and exercise of corresponding national laws in practice;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the creation of a European body of cross-border labour inspectors to carry obetter and more efficient cooperation and exchange of information between Member States' administrations responsible for labour inspections and for distribution of social security contribut ion-the-spot checks in suspected cases of social dumping, including by identifying 'letterbox companies', which body woulds in order to detect in a timely and efficient ways cases of breach of labour and social law; calls on Member States to use all possibilities given by the Enforcement Directive on the posting of workers 2014/67/EU in order to identify and penalise 'letterbox companies'; recommends to the Commission to consider changing the Eurodetachement projects into a permanent platform of exchange, common training and collaboration for labour inspectors and public officials of liaison offices on Posting involved in control and monitoring, which could be included or work in coordination with the platform against undeclared work in order to limit the financial burden involved;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the implementation byon Member States ofto make electronic systems available for the registration of the prior declaration of posting missions;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive based on ILO Convention No. 189 concerning decent work for domestic workMember States to establish legal frameworks allowing for lawful employment of domestic workers and carers, in order to provide legal certainty for both the workers and their potential employers;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Takes the view that the competent authorities should be able to suspend the provision of servicimplement discouraging fines in cases of serious breaches of legislation on postings; considers that the amount of the fines should exceed employees' contributionstresses the importance of provisions of the Enforcement Directive on Posting of workers 2014/67/EU on the cross-border enforcement of financial administrative penalties and/or fines, guaranteeing the effective, proportionate and dissuasive character of the latters;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Requests that information on postings should not be retroactive and should be entered in a European electronic register; stresses that the competent authorities of the host Member State should be able to revise form A1 in the event of serious doubts about whether a posting is genuineCalls on Member States to exchange information in a timely and efficient manner especially in cases where competent authorities of the host Member State may have serious doubts about whether a posting is genuine and about the reliability of A1 forms provided; stresses that the improved access to information for workers, employers and labour inspectors such as single national website is a key tool in the fight against abuses of rules;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 284 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls its appeal forInvites the Commission to consider evaluating the feasibility of the creation of 'a forgery-proof European social security card (...)or other EU-wide electronic document on which could be stored all the data needed to verify the bearer's social security status based on an employment relationship'11 [1]; wishes all the necessary information associated with the worker's postings to feature on this card; __________________ 11 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDo c.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA- 2014-0012+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 293 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for a public list to be drawn up of enterprises responsible for serious breaches of EU legislation;deleted
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Stresses the need to complement the action against the breaches of social rights with a fight against tax fraud and tax evasion, in order to guarantee a fair competition and a level playing field for the enterprises;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 321 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading II
II. Addressing regulatory gaps in order to implement the principle of 'equal pay and equal social protection for the same work'enforce national and European labour and social law
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to combat the phenomenon of letterbox companies by applying more generally the principle that each company should have a single corporate headquarterarefully monitor the implementation of the Enforcement Directive on the posting of workers in terms of its effectiveness in combating the phenomenon of letterbox companies; recalls the rejection by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs of the proposal for a directive on single-person limited liability companies as some of the provisions suggested could facilitate creation of this kind of entities;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 349 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that Directive 96/71/EC refers only to Articles 57 and 66 TFEU relating to the freedom to provide services and freedom of movement; believes that its legal basis must be complemented by Articles 151 and 153 TFEU;deleted
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 366 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. ConsiderRecalls that the notion of 'minimum wage' contained in Directive 96/71/EC should be revised to ensure equal pay for posted workers and local workers in similar positionsDirective 96/71/EC on the posting of workers contains a very important safeguard clause which obliges employers to apply minimum terms and conditions of employment applicable in the receiving country unless they are less favourable to posted workers; notes that this safeguard clause guarantees fair competition; calls on all posting companies to fully apply this principle, on Member States to control its application and on the European Commission to control its enforcement; stresses the need to respect the universally applicable collective agreements of the host country and to ensure, through the revision ofhe Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009, the payment of gross earnings corresponding to the remuneration paid by the employer before the deduction of taxes and social security contributions payable by employees and withheld by the employer; recalls that specific postings bonuses should be paid on top of remuneration; notes the recent ECJ ruling C-396/13 Sähköalojen ammattiliitto ry v Elektrobudowa Spółka Akcyjna clarifying the concept of 'minimum rates of pay' for posted workers;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Notes the intention of the European Commission to publish the Labour Mobility Package which will allegedly contain certain provisions with regards to posting of workers; calls on the European Commission to make sure new proposals continue to facilitate the freedom to provide services, while protecting workers' rights and are clear, proportionate, non- discriminatory and justified;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 399 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Wishes periods of postCalls on competent authorities in Member States to carefully control, accordings to be limited in Directive 96/71/EC and temporary employment agencies to be excluded from the scope of the directiveexisting rules, whether provision of services, making use of posted workers, is temporary; underlines importance of elements listed in article 4 of the Enforcement Directive in this respect;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 409 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes that due to differences in Member States labour laws it is difficulty to make a clear distinction between employees and self- employed workers at EU level; thus in order to combat bogus self- employment calls on the Commission to propose specific recommendations based on indicators of the existence of an employment relationship according to the ILO Convention 198 on Employment Relationship Recommendation;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 419 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls on the Commission to face new challenges with respect to social protection of workers in digital and sharing economy and to draw up proposals where necessary;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 421 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Calls on all Member States to secure equal treatment of EU migrant workers with regards to their terms and conditions of employment in the host Member State;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 431 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for increasedmore efficient controls on the implementation of working time and rest times in transport; calls for the introduction of automatic digital records and the development of 'smart tachographs' for all means of transport, including inland waterway transport; recalls the desire expressed in its resolution of 3 July 2012 on road transport that 'by 2020 all vehicles which are not exempted from the application of this Regulation in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be fitted with a smart tachograph'12 on a swift implementation of the Regulation No 165/2014 on the tachographs in the road transport; __________________ 12 www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do? type=TA&reference=P7-TA-2012- 0271&language=EN&ring=A7-2012- 0195#BKMD-7
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 446 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for the creation of a European transport agency bringing together existing agencies; takes the view that at the very least a specific road transport agency is needed;deleted
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 465 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Asks the Commission to clarify the provisions so that a distinction can be drawn between employees and self- employed workers to combat 'bogus self employment'; emphasises that airline pilots and train drivers cannot be considered to be independent of the companies for which they work;deleted
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 493 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Believes that the rules on cabotage are not sufficiently precise, which facilitates the practice of some road operators of engaging in permanent cabotage; wishes cabotage operations to be subject to mandatory prior notification; calls for clarity in this respect in order to make sure which terms and conditions of employment and administrative requirements should apply;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 516 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need for a new regulation on groundhandling at airports to ensure mandatoryappropriate social and wage protection for workers in the event of new calls for tenders or the partial loss of work; supports the introduction of rules to ensure the effective implementation of laws with regard to airlines with 'operational bases' on the territory of a Member State as well as a better quality of services and level playing field for service providers; calls for the clarification of the definition of 'home base' to protect the social rights of cabin crews, in particular their rest periods;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 533 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on Member States to review their laws to eliminate precarious contracts called 'zero hour contracts' or 'pay to fly contracts'make sure that flexible employment contracts have an appropriate social security coverage under national and EU law; believes that precariousunsecure working conditions arcan be an additional safety risk;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 542 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission shortly to submit a proposal for a directive on requirements with regard to the crews of vessels providing regular cargo, passenger and ferry services operating between Member States so that the conditions applicable on board a vessel are those of the State applying the most favourable standards for workers;deleted
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 565 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission rapidly to draw up proposals to combat unfair competition in the digital and sharing economy;deleted
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 594 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that a social protocol is necessary to ensure the primacy ofRecalls that the EU law provides clear rules on the fundamental rights overand economic freedoms and that this is further specified by existing ECJ rulings;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 605 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. calls for respect and promotion of cooperation among employers' and employees' representatives aimed at anticipating and reacting to the changes in the labour market and at reaching agreements on higher standards of employment;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 612 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls the Commission's commitment to proposing a basis of minimum social rights; emphasises that the establishment of criteria for comparing the various national social systems cannot provide such a basis, but can only serve as a preliminary analytical frameworkrole to propose minimum legal requirements in view to achieve objectives set in the art.151 TFEU taking account of the diverse forms of national practice and the subsidiarity principle;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 628 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Desires that wage floors be established, possibly in the form of a minimum wage; emphasises that this instrument should be set up on the basis of legislation or convention, in accordance with national practices, with due respect for the role of the social partners; believes that these wage floors should represent at least 60% of the average national wage; calls on the Commission to consult the social partners with a view to introducing, where appropriate, a minimum wage in some border areas associated with highly mobile workersEncourages Member States to introduce, according to their national law and practice and after consulting social partners, a national minimum wage; invites Member States, where this is feasible, to make the minimum wage represent at least 60% of the average national wage;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 658 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Supports the development of unemployment benefit arrangements as a mechanism ft Member States level and their por tabsorbing asymmetric social shocks within the euro areaility under the EU social security coordination;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 672 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. CRecalls on the Commission to propose a legal instrument to address the cross- border dimensions of outsourcing, extending the joint and several liability of the payer to include all economic sectors athat Member States can set up, in consultation with the concerned social partners, "joint and several liability" mechanisms at national level applicable towards local and foreign companies in order to enable local and foreign workers to execute their rights; reminds the entire subcontracting chainat such a possibility was confirmed by the Enforcement Directive on the Posting of workers;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 676 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Recognizes the risks related to long chains of subcontracting; calls on the Commission to carefully monitor the application of the obligation put on Member States in the Enforcement Directive to provide for measures ensuring that in the construction sector in subcontracting chains posted workers can hold the contractor of which the employer is a direct subcontractor liable for the respect of their workers' rights;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 679 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to propose an appropriate legislative vehicle providing that companies have a duty of care for which they may be held liable, in respect of both their subsidiaries that their subcontractors operating in third countriesall relevant stakeholders to put in place an appropriate cooperation in order to prevent the risk of violations of human rights, corruption, severe physical injury or environmental damage and the violation of ILO Conventions;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 699 #

2015/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Considers that Directive 96/71/EC and the rules coordinating social security systems must be revianalysed before any trade agreement including provisions relating to 'Mode 4' can be concluded;
2016/02/25
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for a stronger role for social partners in the development and implementation of common agricultural policy in order to create quality jobs, ensure adequate health and safety conditions and foster the social integration of rural workers, in particularcluding migrant workers;
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2015/2226(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for the defence of the right to public services in rural areas against current neo-liberal policies; supports the development of minimum income schemesSupports the development of minimum income schemes at national level and all the measures targeted to ensure social cohesion, given the high rate of poverty and social exclusion in rural areas.
2016/04/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 108 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Invites the Commission to present, in the context of the announced social pillar, an EU framework directive on adequate minimum income in 2016encourage Member States to introduce minimum wage schemes at national level as a way to fight against poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to present a newwork on a social pillar; recalls that to deliver on Article 9 TFEU, such a pillar should be aimed at setting a European framework for a minimum income above the poverty level, continuing with a rights- based approach to social policy and improving implementation of existing social, labour and anti-discrimination legislationimproving implementation of existing social, labour and anti-discrimination legislation, modernising existing legislation as well as presenting new legislative measures if needed in order to improve effectiveness of social and employment policies;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to aim for a social triple A score for the Union; finds regrettable that this is currently considers it to be a challenge taking into account of reach owing tocases of increasing inequality, high poverty and social exclusion and less and less availability of quality and affordable social, health and care services; recalls that a social triple A must be based on Article 9 TFEU aimed at a ‘high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion and a high level of education, training and protection of human health’; recalls that achieving a social triple A as a benchmark requires assessing both policies that hinder and work towards achieving the benchmark; finds regrettable that so far the latter has not been addressed at Union level sustainable growth in Europe is key in order to deliver on this commitment;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recommends that an EU framework directive on minimum income should specify which criteria Member States’ minimum income schemes would need to meet so as to lift people out of poverty; considers that such a framework would need to be rights-based, address the level of income, the non-discriminatory, efficient and easy access and the take-up, targeting especially those groups, who currently are excluded from or at risk of exclusion from minimum income schemesAcknowledges that there are different systems in Member States with regards to minimum income schemes; underlines therefore that a strengthened dialogue between Member States and EU institutions is needed in this regard;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that minimum income schemes should prevent and lift households out of severe material deprivation and allow for an income above the poverty threshold; recalls that a minimum income ischemes at national level are a key instrument for delivering on Article 9 TFEU guaranteeing adequate social protection as well as on the fundamental right to decent living conditions, participating in society and protection of human health;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Underlines that poverty among older persons is a major problem in many Member States; calls therefore on EU countries to reform pension systems in order to guarantee an adequate level of pension incomes as well as sustainability and security of pension systems;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 344 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Member States not to exempt the energy intensive industries from taxes, but to use these revenuto consider using the revenues from taxes put on energy intensive industries for measures that benefit low-income households, including targeted energy efficiency measures and financing of social security systems, which can in turn reduce the burden on labour costs; considers that such an offsetting mechanism could be an integral element of a socially equitable tax shift as proposed by the Commission in the current employment guidelines;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that whilst it is impossible to hold backentirely quantify the effects of the digital revolution, it is possible to shape its course with a view to reach positive results for employers and employees;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to undertake a thorough assessment of the impact which digitalisation will have on the number and types of jobs available and to gather information on new forms of employment, such as crowdsourcing and crowdworking;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that as job and skills profiles become more complex, new demands are being placed on training and further education which must be adapted to new market realities; emphasises the importance of social dialogue in efforts to bring course content up to date and develop skills strategies;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to quickly take the initiative to amend the law to reflect technological progress and eliminate a serious obstacle to the development of the e-book and e-paper market;
2015/10/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 131 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the digitalisation-driven trend towards more flexible working practices may also give rise to precarious forms of employment to which current standards as regards social security, working time, working location, worker participation and employment protection no longer apply; calls for self-employed persons with quasi-employee status to be pcan offer an opportunity for both employees and companies; underlines at the same time the need to strike balanced on an equal footing with employed persons under employment law between flexibility and security for employees;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 157 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that freedom of association must apply in e need to better align labour market legislation withe context of new forms of employmenthallenges arising from digitalisation;
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2015/2147(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the social partners to suggest ways of enhancing social security for self- employed persons in need of protection, in order to safeguard the effectiveness of existing national systems.deleted
2015/10/01
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas only half of the people between 55 and 65 are in employment, and long- underlines the fact that the female employment rate in this age group in some Member States is around or less than 30%, and the gender employment gap is the highest - 14,5 pps compared to the gap for the middle age group (30-54 years old)- 12.4 pps and the young group (20-29 years old) - 8.3 pps1a , takes the view that long-term unemployment is particularly prevalent among younger and older employees;, especially women; __________________ 1a Source: Eurostat, LFS, 2012
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2015/2116(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Recalls that the most important resource of the EU and the Member States is their human resources; calls for investment in the development of the digital and soft skills needed in the future, including throughtakes the view that e-skills are essential for older workers over 55 in order to safeguard them from the exclusion from the labour market and to facilitate them in finding new employment, calls on the Commission and the Member States to support and invest in life-long learning, as well as comprehensive training and schemes and the retraining of older employeeswhich prepare for a better adaptation to growing demand for e-skills in many different sectors, stresses therefore that older workers over 55, especially women should have continuous access to trainings on ICT;
2016/03/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that future trade agreements should take into account Parliament’s resolutions on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and on the Trade in Services Agreement, which remain valid for the future EU trade policy, in particular as far as the protection of public services is concerned;(Does not affect the English version.)
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Rejects anyStresses that further liberalisation of the GATS Mode 4 commitments should be subject to monitoring of compliance with EU and national labour standards;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that labour standards, including the eight fundamental International Labour Organisation conventions, must be equally implemented in all chaptercomplied with by signatories of trade agreements, and that these agreements must include a revision clause allowing a party to leave the agreement or to suspend commitments in the event of infringementsfor review of the application of labour and social standards;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the need to increase theensure sufficient staffing levels of, and the resources available to, Member States’ labour inspectorates to allow for effective monitoring of labour standards;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of binding measures for due diligence in the production chain, ensuring liability going beyondsupplementing voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives;
2016/04/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. calls on the European Commission to develop a method to enable monitoring of the number and nature of jobs lost and created by robotisation and automation, and the impact of this phenomenon on income lost by social security systems, taking account of the fact that the development of robotics is often co- financed with EU funds;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. stresses that the lack of legal provisions and regulations with regard to work automation is flagrant, given the fact that it underpins the new and already ongoing industrial revolution;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. education must pave the way for the next generation to be able to live fully productive lives in a world which will be changed by robotisation and automation; today’s fast-paced automation and digitalisation of work and services require digital skills and competences to be developed immediately in order to ensure a high level of employment, eradicate growing digital illiteracy and the risk of social exclusion that is associated with it;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. stresses that in the face of already- increasing divisions in society, with a shrinking middle class, it is important to bear in mind that developing robotics may lead to a high concentration of wealth and influence in the hands of a minority;
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2015/2103(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. an answer must be found to the 5. question of which areas might see restrictions tor a ban on total automation in order to guarantee safety and safeguard employment levels, taking into account demographic changes and sustainability and any unintended social consequences.
2016/09/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has adopCommission's efforts to created an ambitious European migration agenda; and urges the European Council to show the samea high level of ambition and to support the Commission by deedstay united in order to come up with timely and strong responses towards the migration crisis;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on Member States to exchange good practice on how to integrate refugees into European society and labour market; calls on the Commission to take advantage of Member States' experiences and come up with a set of recommendations on how to complete this process in an effective way;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Maintains that labour market data have to be taken into account in the permanent relocation mechanism for refugeeswhen designing integration policies in the EU in order to ensure that ithis process will not worsen the social and economic situation for refugees’ home territoriin host Member States and their populations;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that the majority of asylum seekers whose applications have been rejected in any Member States stay in the EU without any legal status, which means that there are a growing number of illegal migrants without right to work and access to education for their children; stresses therefore a need to control and monitor illegal migrants as they are at risk of social exclusion and poverty, which makes them susceptible to all types of external influences including radicalism;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on Member States to carefully screen their education systems in order to identify ways on how to integrate refugees’ children as soon as possible into the education process;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission and Members States to carry out an information campaign in migrants' countries of origin in order to provide them with proper, adequate information on procedure of granting asylum in the EU, as well as their rights and obligations in Members States in order to ensure that those who travel have a valid legal claim for asylum;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. CHighlights the need to strengthen the importance of the EU Blue Card, which is applicable to highly-qualified workers from third-countries, and which helps to address demographic challenges in the EU by filling shortages in the EU's labour markets, stresses the fact that highly- qualified migrants could be an asset in integrating and assimilating other non- EU nationals to European societies; calls on the Commission to adopt an ambitious approach when revising the ‘Blue Card’ Directive3 in order to improve its implementation and make it clearer and more effective in attracting highly qualified labour. __________________ 3 Council Directive 2009/50/EC of 25 May 2009 on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of highly qualified employment, OJ L 155, 18.6.2009, p. 17.
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on Member States to duly take into account non- governmental organisations and other relevant stakeholders when designing integration strategies as well as information campaigns addressed to local communities;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on Member States to prepare local societies to welcome refugees and their families via well prepared information campaigns;
2015/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. Having regard to social challenges such as population ageing or social exclusion as well as the need to facilitate reconciliation of work with family life,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C b (new)
Cb. having regard to the fact that household services, family employment and home care have a potential to improve economic and social cohesion in the EU,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C c (new)
Cc. having regards to the fact that an adequate regulation of this sector would contribute to fighting with undeclared work,
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2015/2094(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on policy makers to recognise household services, family employment and home care as a valuable economic sector that needs to be better regulated within Member States with a view to create a friendly environment for domestic workers and provide families with a capacity to assume their role as employers;
2015/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. StressesPoints out that regardless of 2 million unfilled vacancies in the EU there are many over-qualified youth unemployed whose skills do not match demand of the labour market, stresses therefore, the need to build up partnerships between local authorities, education and employment services and the business community to support the creation, implementation and monitoring of employment strategies and action plans; calls for closer and structural co-operation between education, public administration, business and civil society, especially youth organisations;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to build up partnerships between local authorities, education and employment services and the business community to support the creation, implementation and monitoring of employment strategies and action plans; calls for closer and structural co-operation between education, public administration, business and civil society, especially youth organisations;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of administrative capacity; calls thereforefor the strengthening of the partnership principle as well as for the provision of appropriate training for local and regional authorities as well as other relevant stakeholders in order to use European funds more effectively and strategically;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Underlines that entrepreneurial skills can be acquired also through skills development programmes organised outside of the general education system and that these programmes may include coaching and mentoring activities supplied by experienced trainers, entrepreneurs and business experts that facilitate not only valuable business know-how, advice and feedback to potential entrepreneurs but also allow them to develop valuable network of contacts with existing enterprises and entrepreneurs that could otherwise take very long time to achieve;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls that employers and entrepreneurs play a great role in training in the workplace as well as providing apprenticeships and that this should be further supported and developed;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that good quality educational guidancetailor- made guidance and support at all stages of education is necessary and can lower the risk of early school-leaving as well as help to overcome difficulties in accessing the labour market;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses the importance of regular monitoring of the future skills needs' and encourages therefore Member States and all relevant stakeholders to share good practice in this regard and further develop monitoring and forecasting tools;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls for enhanced cooperation between education institutions (both on vocational and higher level) and entrepreneurs in developing curricula adjusted to the labour market needs;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines the importance of developing digital skills and media literacy from the earliest stage at school and going through the whole education cycle;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the recent decision by EU co-legislators on increasing pre-financing for the Youth Employment Initiative, which aims to smooth the implementation of this important initiative for regions and states facing financial difficulties; calls Member States and local and regional authorities to use the available funds for bringing forward the necessary structural reforms and creating sustainable instead of only ad hoc solutions;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Points out that, despite high youth unemployment rates in some Member States and unfilled job vacancies in others, intra-EU labour mobility remains low; recalls therefore the importance of the mobility of workers for a competitive labour market, and stresses the need to reduce the linguistic and cultural barriers that are liable to restrain it by providing sector-specific language courses and trainings on intercultural communication for the unemployed;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 243 #

2015/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that skills development should also be considered as a mechanism leading to equal opportunities for people from disadvantaged groups, in particular for children and young people from families affected by poverty, the long-term unemployed, including second-generation unemployed, immigrants and people with disabilities; stresses that prevention as well as life- long support and counselling at anfrom the earlyiest stage possible are of the outmost importance, because although enabling people who are at a disadvantage to develop skills and to enter the labour market requires time and resources it is also socially and economically profitable; also stresses the need to provide support and skills development via training for employers, recruiters and human resources managers to support the inclusion of disadvantaged groups into the labour markets;
2015/09/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2015/2061(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note ofIs dismayed at the result of the popular initiative of 9 February 2014; calls, however, on the European Union to remain firm on the fundamental principle of free movement of persons and services so that Switzerland continues to grant privileged access to Union workers and enterprises;
2015/05/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the ILO’s eight core labour standards and the four ILO Priority Conventions for the industrialised countries to be systematically includeda complete inclusion of EU labour standards and law in all bilateral EU trade agreements;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for sustainable impact assessments and human rights impact assessments to be carried out, at bilateral level, before, during and afterwith regards to the negotiations; takes the view, also, that negotiators should take into account to a greater extent the priorities and concerns that emerge from these impact studies;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Points out that digitalisation has a substantial impact on the labour market by modifying job dynamism, creating new job opportunities and more flexible working conditions such as telecommuting or teleworking which could serve as a an effective tool for better reconciliation of professional and domestic duties for both women and men;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 b (new)
-1b. Highlights the fact that the Commission's estimations show that allowing more women to enter the digital jobs market can create an annual € 9 billion GDP boost in the EU area;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 c (new)
-1c. Stresses the importance of improving digital skills and IT-literacy among women and boosting their inclusion into ICT, which is one of the highest paying sectors, which could contribute to women's financial empowerment and independence resulting in the reduction of the total gender wage gap and future pension gap;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights the fact that the ICT sector is characterised by both vertical and horizontal segregation which is even higher that the other sectors, as well as a gap between women's educational qualifications and their position in the ICT sector; whereas the majority (54 per cent) of women employed in ICT sector occupy lower paid and lower skill-level positions and only a small minority of them (8 per cent) are in the high skill software engineer positions; whereas women are also underrepresented in the decision-making within this sector with only 19,2 per cent of ICT sector workers having female bosses compared to 45,2 per cent of non-ICT sector workers;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Stresses that the ICT sector is rapidly growing, creating around 120,000 new jobs every year, however skills shortage in ICT and related services might cause up to 900,000 unfilled vacancies by 2020, due to a skills mismatch, stresses therefore the importance to make a full use of women's potential and talents to fill up those vacancies and include women to the ICT sector in order to boost economy in the EU and women's employment opportunities as well as offer a level of protection against exclusion from the labour market;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Highlights the fact that some Member States (Germany, Spain, Sweden) initiated policies to encourage a positive gender balance within Europe's ICT professions, and these policies are primarily aimed at promoting ICT-related studies and career paths for girls and women from an early age;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Points out that digitalisation in the labour market changes nature of work and relations between employer and employee as well as creates new possibilities of organisation of work; stresses that these new opportunities require rethinking and redefying terms such as place and boundaries of work time; stresses that employees labour rights guaranteed by Member States' labour law, should be safeguarded independently of new forms and organisation of work brought by digitalisation;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 82 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the opportunity for a better work-life balance for women in the digital age; emphasises the risks posed by potential demand for a constant accessibility of employees (e.g. burnout); advocates, therefore, a ‘right to log off’ for workerstresses therefore the need for respecting working time arrangements under flexible hours employment contracts in order to maintain the boundaries of working time as defined by the labour law in the individual Member States;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2015/2007(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Takes the view that women over 55 are more likely to have depreciated e-skills due to the lack of life-long learning and that digitalization constitutes an important barrier for older job seekers with limited e-skills, calls on the Commission and the Member States to support life-long learning as well as training and schemes which prepare for a better adaptation or a potential change of career path according to the growing demand for e-skills in many different sectors with a special regard to women over 55 in order to safeguard them from the exclusion from the labour market;
2015/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas young entrepreneurs face numerous challenges and difficulties such as lack of experience, right skills, access to finance and infrastructure;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to apply a business- friendly approach when drafting legislation and constantly remove barriers to entrepreneurship in order to help young people to transform their creative ideas into successful business plans;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to be proactive in simplifying the regulatory frameworks of socialfor businesses, promote them and monitor the quality of the employment practices of such businesses and removing barriers to entrepreneurship;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need to address financial difficulties that affect young entrepreneurs and facilitate their access to special grants and microcredits as well as reduce existing administrative and regulatory burdens, especially in the very beginning of their entrepreneurial activities;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on Member States to develop policy measures in order to increase the entrepreneurial knowledge among young people via specialised trainings from an early age, development of soft skills such as teamwork, autonomy and self- initiative as well as to promote the idea of becoming an entrepreneur;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 81 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses the importance of practical experience for the success of start- ups set up by young entrepreneurs, therefore calls on Member States to develop initiatives that provide young entrepreneurs with skills, advice, coaching and mentoring activities led by experienced entrepreneurs and business experts;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the important role that teachers play in fostering an entrepreneurial mindset among young people and providing them with right skills and qualifications, therefore calls on Member States to pay special attention to development and provision of specialised and experience- based trainings to teachers;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2015/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to monitor concrete measures implemented by Member States to support entrepreneurship among young people and to devote special attention to the promotion and publication of information about results and to encourage exchange of best practice.
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2015/2005(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Commission to ensure that proposals on the opening-up of services in all transport markets do not lead to social dumpinggo hand in hand with the proper enforcement of existing EU social regulations and do not lead to unnecessary additional administrative burdens in the Member States, distortion of the fair competition in the internal market, poorer-quality services, monopolies or oligopolies;
2015/04/24
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 500 #

2015/2005(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – indent 6
the adoption of a social code forenforcement of existing EU legislation in order to protect rights of mobile road transport workers, addressing also the problem of disguised self-employment;
2015/04/24
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 155 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 3
Structural weaknesses in education and training systems should be addressed to ensure quality learning outcomes and prevent and tackle early school leaving. Member States should increase educational attainment and consider dual learning systems adapted to their needs and upgrading professional training while at the same time increase opportunities for recognising skills acquired outside the formal education system. Links between education and labour market should be strengthened.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 3 – paragraph 3
Member States should strengthen active labour market policies by increasing their targeting, outreach, coverage and interplay with passive measures. These policies should aim at improving labour market matching and support sustainable transitions on the labour market, with public employment services delivering individualised support and implementing performance measurement systems. Member States should also ensure that their social protection systems effectively activate and enable those who can participate in the labour market, protect those (temporarily) excluded from the labour markets and/or unable to participate in it, and prepare individuals for potential risks and changing economic and social conditions, by investing in human capital. Member States should promote inclusive labour markets open to all and also put in place effective anti-discrimination measures.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2015/0051(NLE)


Annex 1 – section 3 – paragraph 4
Mobility of workers should be ensured with an aim of exploiting the full potential of the European labour market, including by enhancing the portability of pensions and the recognition of qualifications as well as by removing other existing barriers. Member States should at the same time guard against abuses of the existing rules.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/0026(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In order to address the budgetary constraints faced by Member States at the initial stage of the programming period and, taking into account the urgent need to address youth unemployment and the specific features of the YEI, it is appropriate to lay down provisions in order to complement Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, with a view to increase the level of the initial pre-financing paid to operational programmes supported by the YEI in 2015. To ensure that Member States have sufficient means to provide payments to beneficiaries responsible for the implementation of operations that target youth unemployment, an additional initial pre-financing amount from the specific allocation for the YEI should be paid in 2015 for operational programmes supported by the YEI, in order to complement the pre-financing amounts paid in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. In order to enable a prompt implementation of the operational programmes supported by the YEI, the Commission should commit itself to pay the pre-financing amount to the Member States immediately after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2015/03/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2015/0026(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) To ensure that the additional initial pre- financing amount is used for the immediate implementation of the YEI, it should be foreseen that this amount is reimbursed to the Commission, if the Union contribution from the YEI does not amount to an adequate level in interim payment applications submitted to the Commission 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. This measure is a safeguard to ensure that eligible Member States set up the required structures to promptly implement the YEI. Member State action is urgently needed to deliver on the YEI and combat alarming levels of youth unemployment.
2015/03/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) The impact of the EFSI on employment should be systematically monitored and further encouraged, especially with a view to achieving prolonged societal gains in the form of sustainable and quality employment as a result making both investors and workers benefit from EFSI.
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 279 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
2. The EU guarantee shall be granted for EIB financing and investment operations approved by the Investment Committee referred to in Article 3(5) or funding to the EIF in order to conduct EIB financing and investment operations in accordance with Article 7(2). The operations concerned shall be consistent with Union policies, contribute to achieving the objectives of Europe 2020 and support any of the following general objectives:
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 294 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The EFSI should target projects with a higher risk-return profile than existing EIB and Union instruments to ensure additionality over existing operations. The EFSI should finance projects across the Union, including in the countries most affected by the financial crisis promoting geographical spread. The EFSI should only be used where financing is not available from other sources on reasonable terms.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 320 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) The selection method of investment projects should take into consideration different levels of development of national financial markets as well as their stability, which will have a direct impact on the ability to use the EFSI in Member States. This will secure the distribution of financial resources throughout the whole Union.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 341 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Decisions on the use of the EFSI support for infrastructure and large mid- cap projects should be made by an Investment Committee. The Investment Committee should be composed of independent experts who are knowledgeable and experienced in the areas of investment projects and have thorough knowledge of sectors concerned, their specificities as well as local markets. The Investment Committee should be accountable to a Steering Board of the EFSI, whoich should supervise the fulfilment of the EFSI's objectives. The independence of the Investment Committee is a key factor in ensuring the trust and participation of the private sector in the Investment Plan. To effectively benefit from the experience of the EIF, the EFSI should support funding to the EIF to allow the EIF to undertake individual projects in the areas of small and medium enterprises and small mid-cap companies.
2015/03/19
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 351 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the EIB shall publish a comprehensive report on the functioning of the EFSI and its results in terms of growth and jobs;
2015/03/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 387 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) Financial contributions to the EFSI by Member States, including possible participation in investment platforms, should not be taken into account by the Commission when defining the fiscal adjustment under either the preventive or the corrective arm of the Pact. In the event of an excess over the deficit reference value, the Commission should not launch an EDP if that excess is only due to the contribution and is small and expected to be temporary. Similarly no procedure should be launched when assessing an excess over the debt reference value in the event that this is due solely to contributions to the EFSI.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 395 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Provided that all relevant eligibility criteria are fulfilled, Member States may use European Structural Investment Funds to contribute to the financing of eligible projects that are supported by the EU guarantee. The flexibility of this approach should maximise the potential to attract investors to the areas of investment targeted by the EFSI. The EFSI may also be used for co- financing projects eligible under European Structural and Investment Funds.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 446 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Alongside the financing operations that will be conducted through the EFSI, a European Investment Advisory Hub ('EIAH') should be created. The EIAH should provide strengthened support for project development and preparation across the Union, by building on the expertise of the Commission, the EIB, national promotional banks and the managing authorities of the European Structural and Investment Funds. This should establish a single point of entry for questions related to technical assistance for investments within the Union, access to which should be fostered by creating sub- national centres for investment support, facilitating effective dissemination of information.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 569 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSI shall be to support investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing for Union- based companies having up to 3000 employees, with a particular focus on small and medium enterprises, through the supply of risk bearing capacity to the EIB ('EFSI Agreement').
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 612 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1a Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply: "national promotional banks or institutions" mean legal entities carrying out financial activities on a professional basis which are conferred a mandate by a Member State, whether central, regional or local level, to carry out public development or promotional activities.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 735 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. Member States that become parties to the EFSI Agreement shall be able to provide their contribution, in particular, in the form of cash or a guarantee acceptable to the EIB. Other third parties shall be able to provide their contribution only in cash. Financial contributions by Member States, including possible contributions to investment platforms, shall not be taken into account by the Commission when defining the fiscal adjustment under the preventive and corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact. In the event of an excess over the deficit reference value the Commission shall not launch an EDP if that excess is only due to the contribution and is small and expected to be temporary. Similarly, no procedure shall be launched when assessing and excess over the debt reference value in the event that this is due solely to contributions to the EFSI.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 866 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Investment Committee shall be composed of sixtwelve independent experts and the Managing Director. Independent experts coming from different Member States shall have a high level of relevant market experience in project finance as well as thorough knowledge of sectors concerned, their specificities as well as local markets and be appointed only by the Steering Board for a renewable fixed term of three years.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 981 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) expansion of renewable energy and energy and resource efficiencydevelopment and modernisation of the energy sector, including the development of indigenous energy sources;
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 1070 #

2015/0009(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Provided that all relevant eligibility criteria are fulfilled, Member States may use European Structural and Investment Funds to contribute to the financing of eligible projects in which the EIB is investing with the support of the EU guarantee. The EFSI may also be used for co- financing projects eligible for European Structural and Investment Funds.
2015/03/25
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 37 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fostering of a European investment policy aimed at boosting growth and job creation; welcomes the fact, that the main aims of projects getting support from EFSI should be quality job creation as well as achieving social, economic and territorial cohesion; considers it regrettable, however, that Parliament’s call3 to promote social investment not only in pursuit of financial profit but also with the aim of promoting a positive social impact has not been neglected; __________________ 3 entirely taken into account; __________________ 3 Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraphs 10 and 18.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the Commission's initiative to modernise the regulatory and administrative environment in order to improve investment climate and conditions for SMEs to grow and therefore strongly supports recommendations leading to improvement in efficiency of administration and more flexible and competitive product and service markets;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 56 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the recommendations on the need to move forward within new and ambitious labour reforms, and calls for such reforms, if carried out, to guarantee social dialogue and to ensure necessary political consensus in order to be sustainable and effective; considers it regrettable that many labour reforms have not ensured the required balance between flexibility and security, resulting in, for example, the exclusion of millions of workers from collective bargainingin some countries there is no adequate balance between flexibility and security and asks this issue to be addressed by reforms; calls for labour reforms capable of reducing fragmentation, putting an end to insecurity and increasing the productivity and competitiveness of our economy while ensuring decent jobs and living wages through investment in human capital;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) have warned of the social (in-work poverty) and economic (depressed internal demand) problems caused by the wage devaluation that has occurred in recent years; considers it regrettable that there is no reference to the importance of increasing wages, especially in those countries where wages are below the poverty thresholdsupports recommendations calling for better adaptation of wages to productivity developments; recalls that minimum wages differ substantially between Member States (Bulgaria EUR 184/month, Luxembourg EUR 1 923/month), and reiterates its request for a study4 on this issue including an analysis of differences in purchasing powers between Member States; __________________ 4 Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068), paragraph 47.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take note of the IMF2 report on the causes and consequences of inequality, which states that the increase in the income gap is negatively affecting economic growth and the potential for job creation; calls for effective action on labour taxanhanced efforts to shift taxation burden from labour towards other sources, effective action, on labour markets and redistributive policies to facilitate greater and upward economic and social convergence; __________________ 2 IMF report ‘Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective’, June 2015.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls for more and stronger recommendations with regards to the need to support and further develop effective vocational education and training, cooperation between education institutions, businesses, employers organisations and other relevant stakeholders as well as the need to improve effectiveness of public and private employment services in order to tackle skills mismatches on the labour market;
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for pension reforms to be made taking into account Parliament’s6 repeat recommendations to ensure their sustainability, safety and adequacy; __________________ 6 Resolution of 11 March 2015 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0068); Resolution of 22 October 2014 (Texts adopted, P8_TA(2014)0038); Resolution of 25 February 2014 (Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0129).
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 167 #

2015/0000(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Is deeply concerned by the limitWelcomes the increased role that national parliaments, social partners and civil society have played in the drafting of the national reform programme (NRP) and the convergence programme (CP); calls on, however, the Commission to further increase the ownership of the European Semester by national parliaments; calls on the Commission to favour, within the revision of theonly through the current economic governance mechanisms, a reform that grants adequate democratic legitimacy to the European Semester.
2015/07/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Strongly rejects the consideration of active ageing policies solelyUnderlines that active ageing policies should not be solely treated as an instrument to maintain the employability of older workers, and; calls on the Member States to make all the necessary assessments before raising the mandatory pension age and prepare workers as well as adapt job places for longer professional careers;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the European Commission and Member States to collect complete and reliable data allowing to assess the effectiveness of ESF spending on older workers;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Takes the view that older people should be a fully-fledged part of society and that their participation in daily life should be supported; considers, furthermore, that a structured dialogue between young and elderly people should be actively encouraged and that there should be a fluent exchange of practice and experience between older and young workers;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2014/2255(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Believes that demographic challenges are not adequately addressed at European level, therefore calls on the forthcoming Presidencies of the EU to bring back this item on the EU agenda and work out strong policy responses;
2015/06/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Draws particular attention to the need for the training or retraining of older members of the workforce who are working for longer owing to the increase in the retirement age in many Member States;
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2014/2247(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Draws particular attention to the need for action to be taken aiming at the full integration of migrants, with regard to the legalisation of employment, language qualifications, and boosting their professional qualifications; points out, at the same time, that, as a group, immigrants are the most at risk of losing their jobs when there is turbulence on the labour markets;
2015/05/19
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that, on account of changes in production patterns, the role of the European Social Fund and investment in adapting workers’ skills have grown significantly; calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that available resources are used as effectively and efficiently as possible with a view to ensuring workers’ employability; at the same time underlines that training programmes financed under ESF should be addressed also to entrepreneurs and staff at managerial level in order to ensure sustainable development of companies, especially SMEs that generate the majority of job places in the EU;
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. calls on Member States, in view of reaching socio-economic convergence, to ensure that also outer and small regions have the necessary capacity such as human resources to absorb available funds;
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on Member States, in view of negative effects that population ageing and demographic challenges have on the labour markets, to develop projects that address population decline and support mobility;
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2014/2245(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Stresses the role of territorial cohesion and in this respect underlines the importance of investments in cross- border infrastructure, such as inland waterways, and their role in fostering socio-economic development of regions.
2015/03/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that several important challenges are affecting Europe's labour market, including increasing demand for highly skilled labour, rapid technological change and development, mismatches between skills and demands of the labour markets, as well as an ageing society which requires that early retirement be made less attractive;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the intra-EU labour mobility remains low (EU27: 0.29 %) due to still existing barriers, with high unemployment rates in some Member States and unfilled job vacancies in others;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Underlines the importance of social investments which aim is to create an activating state that provides workers with instruments enabling them an easy adaptation to changing social and economic conditions as well as to demands of labour markets;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the importance of the mobility of workers for a competitive labour market, and stresses the need to reduce the administrative and linguistic barriers that are liable to restrain it and to further develop tools to facilitate mobility such as swift recognition of qualifications between Member States; encourages raising of awareness of and further improvement of the EU-wide EURES job portal;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that, in order to anticipate future skills needs, labour market stakeholders, including employers’ and employees’ organisations , education and training providers have to be strongly involved at all levels, in particular in designing and implementing vocational qualification programmes;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Stresses the importance of a regular monitoring of the imbalances on the labour market at regional and local level as well as the importance of forecasts of future skills' needs; encourages Member States to exchange good practice in this regards and all interested stakeholders to further develop monitoring and forecasting tools;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that training and re- qualification programs for the unemployed as well as skills assessment programs should be offered to people to enhance their chances on the labour markets and should be designed and implemented in close cooperation with employers’ associations, with a view to better aligning workers’ new skills with the needs of employers;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that it is of utmost importance to give personalised tailor- made guidance and counselling to jobseekers in how to look for a job and to ensure that their skills are recognisor which further education and training to undertake, and to ensure that their skills and qualifications are recognised and validated through ‘competences passports’ reflecting the skills acquired through both formal and informal learning;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Underlines the need to increase the adaptability of the workforce as a way to counter future shortages; calls on Member States to use the structural funds, especially the European Social Fund, for this purpose;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Underlines the importance of better synergies between education systems and the labour market, including exposure to the workplace, quality internships and cooperation with businesses;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Believes that close partnerships are needed between governments and, employers' and employees' representatives in order to develop long term strategies for respective national labour markets, identify the skills and qualifications which are and will be needed on the labour market and to find the best ways of tackling the problem of skill mismatches in all its dimensions;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Believes that teaching self- responsibility and problem- solving as well as fostering entrepreneurial education from an early age further improves links between school and the labour market, and can contribute to lowering unemployment levels;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Believes that incentives should be introduced for entrepreneurs whto invest their gains in training and apprenticeships for themselves as well as for employees as this will enable them to expand and create new job places;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Regrets that Europe is still lagging behind with regards to technological development; therefore stresses the importance to train teachers and provide them with experience- based know- how that combines practice with theory, especially with regards to new technologies and digitalisation, so that they can convey this knowledge to students;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 315 #

2014/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30 a. Points at the potential lying behind the youth entrepreneurship; calls in this respect on the EU institutions and Member States to become more business- friendly and support young people in getting the right skills as well as in transforming their innovative and creative ideas into successful business plans;
2015/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas an ambitious and balanced agreement with the US may support the reindustrialisation of Europe and help achieve the 2020 target for an increase of the EU’s GDP generated by industry from 15 % to 20 %; whereas it has the potential to create opportunities especially for SMEs, which suffer more from non-tariff barriers (NTBs) than larger companies; whereas an agreement between the two biggest economic blocs in the world has the potential to create standards, norms and rules which will be adopted at a global level, which would serve to the advantage of third countries as well;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point iii a (new)
(iii a) to ensure that on the margin of the TTIP negotiations, the mutually beneficial mobility package arrangements will be achieved, considering the visa facilitation for the European service and goods providers as well as enabling professionals to work in the USA by recognising their qualifications as one of the key elements in taking full advantage of the TTIP agreement;
2015/03/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, given the growing interconnectedness of global markets – up to 40 % of European industrial products are manufactured from imported upstream products – it is crucial that policymakers shape the way these markets interact; whereas proper trade rules are fundamental to creating added value in Europe, since industrial production takes place in global value chains;it is crucial that Europe benefits from participation in global supply chains, while maintaining and developing a strong, competitive and diversified industrial base in Europe; (For consistency with the Recital A European added value should not be built only on e.g. costs of marketing, storage and/or distribution of imports. Also resolution should not quote data without reference to sources. TTIP should first and foremost promote trade of goods manufactured in the EU or the US but the imported goods only repacked/relabelled/assembled in the EU or the US.)
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 78 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas EU's attempts to deal with the challenges of climate change, environmental protection and consumer safety have resulted in high regulatory costs for EU enterprises, coupled with high energy feedstock and electricity prices, which - if left unaddressed in TTIP - may accelerate the process of delocalization, deindustrialization and job losses thereby threatening EU reindustrialization and employment targets, that will also defeat the very policy targets that EU regulations seek to achieve;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 114 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas many economic impact studies on TTIP should be taken with caution as they are built on computable general equilibrium economic models with veryased on many general assumptions and optimistic predictions about the capacity of the EU and the US to reduce regulatory barriers to trade; whereas the TTIP alone will not resolve economic problems in the EU and no false hopes and expectations should be raised in that respect;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 185 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas President Juncker has clearly reiterated in his Political Guidelines that – while the EU and the US can go a significant step further in recognising each other’s product standards and working towards transatlantic standards – the EU will not sacrifice its safety, health, social and data protection standards or our cultural diversity, recalling that the high level of safety of the food we eat and the protection of Europeans’ personal data are non- negotiable;will be maintained; (It is important to stress that we are not talking about lowering standards in negotiations rather than saying that issues of food safety are not-negotiable, as it is not true - issues of food safety or SPS are being negotiated, but we don’t want to decrease level of protection in this negotiations. That is the difference.)
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 324 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) to aim at the elimination of all duty tariffs, while respecting sensitive agricultural and industrial products on both sides;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 331 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new)
(iia) to keep in mind that EU climate change, environmental, labour, consumer safety and animal welfare legislation imposes disproportionate cost burden on EU enterprises, that - in many sectors is - not borne by similar industries in the United States giving US industries a regulatory and cost advantage in those fields - and therefore the European Commission is encouraged to protect these sectors by, including, but not limiting to, negotiating the longest possible transitional periods;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 337 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) to keep in mind that there are important offensive interests for the EU in the services sector, for instance in the areas of engineeringprofessional services, telecommunications and transport services;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 350 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) to ensure that mutually beneficial mobility package is provided for, which includes visa facilitation for providers of services and goods from all Member States and recognises their professional and technical qualifications;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 361 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
(iv) to increase market access for services by mutual recognition for EUs professional service providers, according to the ‘positive list approach’ whereby services that are to be opened up to foreign companies are explicitly mentioned and new services are excluded while ensuring that possible standstill and ratchet clauses only apply to non- discrimination provisions and allow for enough flexibility to bring services back into public control;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 528 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that the negotiations on rules of origin aim at reconcilinge the EU and US approaches; given the conclusion of the negotiations for the Compreh in a way that as far as possible takes into account the interests of European producers and that thus contributes to economic growth and promotes job creation in the EU while protecting the sensitive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between EU and Canada and the potential upgrade of the EU-Mexico free trade agreement, the possibility and scope of cumulation will need to be considered; products; however it must be kept in mind that the purpose of TTIP is to facilitate trade in genuinely US and EU made products and not to allow imports from third countries; Exclusions for certain products will need to be considered on a case by case basis and exclusions from all type of cumulation should be granted for sensitive sectors;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 550 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) to ensure that the regulatory cooperation chapter promotes an effective, pro- competitive economic environment through the facilitation of trade and investment while developing and securing high levels of protection of health and safety, consumer, labour and environmental legislation and of the cultural diversity that exists within the EU; negotiators on both sides should strive to achieve the best outcome in each sector; however, they need to identify and to be very clear about which regulatory measures and standards are fundamental and cannot be compromised, which ones can be the subject of a common approach, which are the areas where mutual recognition based on a common high standard and a strong system of market surveillance is desirable and which are those where simply an improved exchange of information is possible, based on the experience of one and a half years of ongoing talks;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 635 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point ii
(ii) to ensure that the sustainable development chapter aims at the full and effective ratification, implementation and enforcement ofreaffirmation of the Parties' commitment to shared key principles stemming from the eight fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and their content, the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda and the core international environmental agreements; provisions should be aimed at improving levels of protection of labour and environmental standards; an ambitious trade and sustainable development chapter should also include rules on corporate social responsibility based on the Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and a clearly structured civil society involvement; (Commission in its position paper on Trade and Sustainable Development suggests less stringent provisions. We have to be careful in obliging US to ratify all ILO conventions, as this is probably non- negotiable issues for them.)
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 684 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point vii
(vii) to ensure that in course of the negotiations the two sides examine ways to facilitate natural gas and oil exports, so that TTIP wouldTTIP abolishes any existing export restrictions on energy between the two trading partners, thereby supporting a diversification of energy sources in the EU and to consider conditioning tariff reduction on energy intensive goods on effective free flow of US energy to the EU in order to enhance European negotiating position;
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 765 #

2014/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that foreign investors are treated in a non-discriminatory fashion and have a fair opportunity to seek and achieve redress of grievances, which can be achieved withrout the inclusion of an ISDSgh a national court systems or, where appropriate ISDS; all dispute mechanism;s such a mechanism is not necessary in TTIP given the EU’s and the US’ developed legal systems; a state-to- state dispute settlement system and the use of national courts are the most appropriate tools to address investment disputes;et in place within the TTIP- framework must uphold full transparency and be subject to democratic principles and scrutiny with CETA solutions serving as a basis; (It is crucial to include in the ISDS provisions the so called fork-in-the-road provision, which creates an option for the investor to choose EITHER national court system OR investment arbitration; parallel claims should be prohibited. Intergovernmental dispute settlement would leave decision on initiation of an investment dispute to a state, which would inevitably involve political considerations and would limit access of SMEs to dispute settlement.)
2015/03/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 22 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU needs to make a decisive changeinvestments and adjustments in an economic policy that hasin order to allowed the Union to drift away frommeet the EU 2020 targets, and that has increased the risks of secular stagnation; whereas the EU is worryingly losing weight in the world economy, while most other countries are showing solid signs of recoverovercome stagnation; whereas the EU shall aim at being a leader in the world's economy; whereas in October 2014 the IMF estimated that the probability of a recession in the euro area had increased and would reach 35-40% at year’s end;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to prioritise investments in economically weaker regions suffering from high unemployment, and in SMEs in such regions, given their very limited access to financing, to ensure that these efforts have a meaningful impact where they are most needed; choice being made with due regard to the investments' economic features;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Recalls that decent wages are important not only for social cohesion, but also for maintaining a strong economy and a productive labour force; calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a European framework for minimum wages with a view to reducing wage inequalities and limiting nominal imbalances in competitiveness;deleted
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 283 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Is concerned that labour market reforms in many Member States have mainly promotednot managed to decrease the level of precarious jobs; observes that 50 % of jobs created in 2014 were temporary jobs; notes that, according to the Commission, in-work poverty persists, and that for 50 % of all job seekers, securing employment is not enough to lift them out of poverty, nor does it raise productivity; calls on the Commission and the Member States to make job quality a priority and to address labour market segmentation;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 338 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Given the number of workers, particularly young people, who are now leaving their countries of origin for other Member States in search of employment opportunities, there is an urgent need to develop appropriate measures to guarantee that no worker is left uncovered by social and labour rights protection; calls, in this regard, on the Commission and the Member States to further improve EU labour mobility while upholding the principle of equal treatment and safeguarding wages and social standards; calls on each Member State to establish social and employment policies for equal rights and equal pay at the same place of work with regards to the freedom of movement of workers and especially between women and men;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 353 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Reiterates its warning of the socioeconomic challenges facing the Union and the risks to its sustainability and its stable growth potential posed by a reversal in regional convergence; recalls that more than 122 million EU citizens are at risk of poverty or social exclusion, including in- work poverty and child poverty, and that these levels are unacceptable and need to be reduced immediately; calls for a true ‘social pillar’ to be implemented within the EMU asa part of the process of improving economic governance mechanisms;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 382 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Welcomes the fact that the Joint Employment Report annexed to the AGS includes a scoreboard for employment and social policies; considers it regrettable, however, that these indicators are not sufficient and that they have not been made binding, which would allow them to be used more forcefully; asks the Commission to remedy this situation;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 394 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a European minimum income, as announced by its President during the investiture debate, with the aim of reducing poverty in EU;deleted
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 410 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Commission to tackle immediately the alarming increase in child poverty throughout the EU through the introduction of a child guarantee against poverty;long- term and holistic measures.
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas family businesses range in scope from small firms to corporations and represent 60 % of all European companies, providing between 40 % and 50 % of all jobs in the private sector;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas family businesses differ in terms of values from non-family corporations as regards long-term orientation, have amake an essential contribution to the economy, bringing a long-term stability, due to their special degree of commitment to their local community, strong values rooted in the European tradition of the ‘honourable merchant’ and are high level of responsibility as owners – resulting in being generally slower to close down and put workers out of jobs;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the work being undertaken on an EU definition of ‘family business’, and calls for the specificities within Member States’further efforts in establishing an official definitions to be, takening into account, in particular with regard to the specificities within Member States’ and guaranteeings of social rights, social security, pension entitlements and health and safety at work; a simple, clear and easily applicable and comparable between countries definition would help to better understand the phenomenon and the challenges family businesses face, obtain a clear picture of their contribution to society and allow for specific and effective measures to be introduced.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. having identified the ownership as a fundamental issue for the family businesses, calls on the Member States to consider introducing changes to their tax system and company laws, allowing for a more effective and smoother transfer and retention of business within the family; lowering the gift and inheritance tax, introducing favourable tax treatment of the reinvested profits compared to the one of debt financing, favouring the use of non-vote stocks as a way of improving the access to finance without losing control of the company, are only some of the good practices to be shared and promoted;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. whereas intra-family business transfer is often a succession of social and cultural capital, of knowledge generated from generation to generation, it shall be preserved and promoted; however recent figures from 2011 anticipate that each year some 450 000 firms in the EU look for successors, affecting up to 2 million employees; it is estimated that each year there is a risk of losing approximately 150,000 companies and 600,000 jobs due to inefficient business transfers; good practices on raising awareness of planning a company transfer early are crucial in this respect; employee buyouts are also one possible solution to the business succession problem of these European SMEs; appropriately designed long-term EFP models could also contribute to the retention of these small firm and strengthening regional economies and employment throughout the EU;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2a (new)
2a. whereas family businesses represent the largest pool of entrepreneurial potential and are natural incubators for the future entrepreneurs, there is a growing need for enhancing their innovation and progress; moreover in order to professionalise the management of family firms it is crucial to promote entrepreneurship education for both start- ups and existing family firms, incentivising innovation and progress especially at managerial level;
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2014/2210(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2b (new)
2b. whereas long-term objective requires high level of competitiveness and innovation, it is crucial for the family companies to employ skilled and qualified workers; calls on the family businesses themselves to properly balance the family governance aspects within the enterprises in order to attract skilled workforce, often afraid of nepotism and paternalistic practices and lower levels of career progression.
2015/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, in tandem with the EIB, to make it easier forlay down criteria that enable SMEs – the main sources of jobs in Europe – to access financing fromparticipate in investments financed by the European Fund for Strategic Investments, in connection with the European Investment Fund; points out that if project eligibility criteria and participation requirements are laid down as soon as possible, this will allow for preparations to be made and make for better coordinated actions, also on the part of SMEs;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. So as to address the urgent situation with regard to youth unemployment, encourages Member States to use the available resources in an effective and focused way via the introinvestments in human capital, and particularly in education of, with a special focus on the youth employment initiative, and in the areas most affected by unemployment; also recommends that cross-border mobility be supported via cross-border partnerships and via the development of the EURES portal as a vector for youth employment;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2014/2145(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. In the face of ageing populations and pension system reforms, calls on the Member States to give priority to action focusing on older workers; calls on the Commission to lay down criteria and step up checks on the use of EU funding for older workers and to take more action as regards the employment of older people;
2015/02/02
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission’s use of the new employment and social scoreboard for this year’s CSRs; considers it regrettable, however, that Member States' targets regarding these indicators havwere not been made bindingsufficiently ambitious in view of the current employment and social emergency; calls on the Commission, therefore, to put them on an equal footing with macroeconomic indicators, and to include additional indic and the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy; calls on the Commission, therefore, to further insist on the full implementation of the European Platfors – such as child poverty levels, access to healthcare, homelessness, and a decent work index – in the scoreboardm against Poverty and Social Exclusion, The Youth on the Move and the Agenda for New Skills and Jobs, in order to allow more effective analysis of Member States’ employment and social concerns;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the new Commission to make the employment recovery a true priority by establishing an ambitious and holistic strategy for quality job creation, which should involve all the new Commissioners dealing with subjects which have an impact on the EU labour market; takes the view that, to this end, eachthose Commissioners should draw up a quality employment plan for their specific policy area, including concretewith recommendations for measures, a budget allocation and a calendar for its implementation;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to strengthen EU industry through the application of a more flexible competition policy in favour of competitiveness and employment, together with an ecological and digital transition plan; reiterates its call on the Commission to draw upanalyse the necessity of a proposal for a legal act on the provision of information to, and consultation of, workers and the anticipation and management of restructuring in order to ensure economic and socially responsible adaptation to change by EU industry;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to propose a binding European framework for the implementation of the Youth Guarantees so as to prevent the funds being misused in such a way as to aggravate national internal wage devaluation processes; takes the view that this legal framework should introduce binding minimum standards for the implementation of the Youth Guarantees, including the quality of apprenticeships, decent wages for young peoplequality of job offers and access to employment services, and should cover young people aged between 25 and 30; calls on the Commission and the Member States to make the Youth Guarantees a priority and to increase the available budget, at the latest in the promised mid- term review of the multiannual financial framework, up to at least the sum of EUR 21 billion estimated by the International Labour Organisation to be necessary to resolve the problem in the eurozone;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 22
22. Urges the Member States to go above and beyond the March 2014 Council recommendation for a Quality Framework for Traineeships in order to prevent discrimination and exploitation of young workers; calls for the adoption of a directive on decent conditions and minimum standards for internships and traineeships, giving interns and trainees clearly defined rights that include access to social protection, binding written contracts and fair remuneration and introducing limits on the use of trainees and interns in companies so as to prevent abuses;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 199 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 23
23. Observes with concern that female unemployment rates are higher than the total rates (11.7 % in the EU-18 and 10.4 % in the EU-28, compared with 11.5 % and 10.2 % respectively); calls, therefore, for specific decentquality-job creation plans with targeted measures for women; calls for the establishment of specific recommendations with a view to reducing the gender pay gap, which is not only a drag on the economy and on competitiveness but also a sign of social injustice;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 24
24. Is deeply concerned that long-term unemployed people and senior workers are experiencing higher unemployment rates and additional difficulties in re-entering the labour market; calls on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the European Social Fund to help these workers; urges the adoption of a directive on decent working conditions, defining core labour rights for all workers and introducing common minimum standards so as to prevent this kind of labour discrimination;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2014/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 26
26. Regrets the fact that the Commission recommendations on pensions were made without taking into account Parliament’s position on the Green and White Papers on pensions; is concerned that reforms to guarantee the sustainability of pensions have focused solely on population ageing, without taking into account the importance of the employment rate, especially in pay- as-you-go systems; recalls that guaranteeing decent pensions above a minimum level is an effective way to fight poverty and social exclusion;
2014/09/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Proposes to launch a preparatory action on Supporting active inclusion of disadvantaged migrants with the aim to assess benefits and test possibilities to create local centres for social and economic integration.
2014/07/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
(6) The abuse of the status of self- employed as defined in national law, either at national level or in cross-border situations, is frequently associated with undeclared work. Bogus self-employment occurs when a person is declared as self- employed while fulfilling the conditions characteristic of an employment relationship as defined in national law, in order to avoid certain legal or fiscal obligations. Bogus self-employment is, therefore, falsely declared work and should come under the scope of the Platform.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Within the scope of Platform actions, the view of false self-employment should take account of the differences in the legislation of the Member States, and thus of the differences in status of self-employed persons in particular Member States.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) EU level cooperation remains far from comprehensive, both in terms of the Member States involved and the issues covered. There is a no formalwithin the framework of the Platform should draw comprehensively on the work done by existing committees and working groups, as well as by the Internal Market Information System (IMI). A new mechanism in place for cross-border cooperation between Member States’ relevant authorities to address issues related to undeclared workshould be guided by the principle of non-discrimination and take account of the differences in the legislation of the Member States.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 10
(10) The strengthening of cooperation among Member States at EU level is necessary to help Member States to prevent and deter undeclared work more efficiently and effectively, while respecting the freedom to provide services, the free movement of workers and the principle of non-discrimination.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The decision on the degree of involvement in Platform actions established on its forum should lie with the Member States.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 14
(14) In order to address undeclared work comprehensively and successfully, and while respecting the freedom to provide services, the free movement of workers and the principle of non-discrimination, a policy mix is to be implemented in the Member States, that is facilitated by structured cooperation between relevant authorities. The cooperation should include all national authorities which are leading and/or active in the prevention and/or deterrence of undeclared work.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 309 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) increasing public awareness on the urgency of actiontrue scale of the problem and the need for appropriate measures, and encouraging Member States to step up their efforts in dealing with undeclared work.
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Improve the knowledge of undeclared work by means of common concepts, measurement tools and promotion of joint comparative analysis and research and related relevant indicators,
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 344 #

2014/0124(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Develop the analysis of effectiveness of different policy measures in curbing the incidence of undeclared work, including preventive and punitive as well as deterrence measures in generalmeasures encouraging and promoting the registration of employment;
2014/12/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) to support smooth transition from education to work in the Union labour market.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 335 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The National Coordination Office promotes the collaboration with stakeholders such as career guidance services, universities, chambers of commerce, organisations representing vulnerable groups on the labour market such as woman, people with disabilities, elderly people, migrants and organisations involved in apprenticeships and traineeships schemes.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The National Coordination Office promotes the collaboration with stakeholders such as career guidance services, universities, chambers of commerce, organisations representing vulnerable groups on the labour market such as women, people with disabilities, elderly people, migrants and organisations involved in apprenticeships and traineeships schemes.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 400 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Applicant organisations can choose to participate in the EURES network according toby means of the following options:
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 401 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to contributeing to the pool of job vacancies in accordance with Article 14(1), paragraph (a);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 404 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to contributeing to the pool of job applications and CV’s in accordance with Article 14(1), paragraph (b);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 407 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to provideing support services to workers and employers in accordance with Chapter IV or.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 409 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a combination of points (a) to (c).deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 566 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) to provide training on intercultural communication and sector-specific language courses;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 658 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Data shall be gender-disaggregated where applicable.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 699 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Article 14(1) to (7) shall apply from … [two years after the date of entry into force].
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2013/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas labour market rigiditiesvarious factors such as labour market rigidities, high labour costs, red tape have been identified as having a negative impact on job creation;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2013/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the single market and European human resources potential can play a key role in achieving the Europe 2020 employment targets;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2013/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes it is indispensable to introduce teaching of entrepreneurial skills already in early childhood education systems;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2013/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Underlines the need to improve the pace of school- to- work transition enabling the young to enter the labour market as soon as possible and avoiding the risk of NEET;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 101 #

2013/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines the need of introducing measures to facilitate reconciliation of work and family life;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2013/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that the opportunities afforded by the single market must be used to inject new life into Europe’s economies by opening up borders, removing still existing obstacles that hamper workers’ mobility and creating new business opportunities;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2013/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Strongly believes that businesses can only create jobs if the right conditions exist, including access to a qualified workforce, availability of flexible contractual arrangements, reasonable labour costs and keeping administrative burdens to a minimum;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 268 #

2013/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Commission and the co- legislators, in the context of the Posting of Workers Directive, to ensure that any new measures adopted are proportionate, justified and non- discriminatory, to strike the right balance between the protection of workers’ rights and the freedom to provide services and to limit the burdens on businesses seeking to benefit from the freedom to provide services;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2013/2175(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that long-term investments, capable of boosting long- term employment, can only exist with adequate financing, which highly depends on the economy's ability to generate savings;
2013/11/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2013/2173(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas in 2012 the employment rate of people aged 55-64 was less than 50 % in the European Union and this could be caused by a number of factors such as outdated skills and qualifications, employers' attitudes towards older workers, difficulties with reconciliation of professional and family life or poorer health;
2013/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 11 #

2013/2173(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas the European Social Fund (ESF), which during the programming period 2007- 2013 accounted for 8% of the EU total budget, is a key financial instrument intended to help Member States achieve EU employment policy objectives, and reliable data are necessary to assess how effectively ESF resources are spent;
2013/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2013/2173(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas maintaining the employability of older workers as well as keeping a high proportion of the population remaining in work until later age is crucial to address demographic challenges and reach the EU target of 75% of the 20-64-year-old population in employment by 2020;
2013/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2013/2173(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the implementation of the ESF must comply with the EU Financial Regulation and, in particular, with the fundamental principles of sound financial management such as effectiveness, which should be understood as attaining the specific objectives set and achieving the intended results;
2013/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2013/2173(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to rely more on quantitative data when analysing the socioeconomic situation of older workers and to provide for a causal link between actions identified within operational programmes and the objectives pursued, which would facilitate verification of consistency between identified needs, chosen strategy and specific goals set ;
2013/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2013/2173(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages thAcknowledges that, according to their different socioeconomic and demographic situations, Member States use different age groups to define older workers; regrets however that this definition is not always consistently applied throughout the whole programming process in a given Member State; encourages therefore Member States to make sure, in the forthcoming programming period (2014-2020), that the age groups used for needs analysis are the same as the age groups used in the programmes and/or in the related actions and targets;
2013/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2013/2173(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Invites Member States to consider introducing two different categories of older workers benefiting from ESF funding, such as workers aged 45- 55 and over 55, and adapting operational programmes to specific needs identified for these two age groups;
2013/11/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2013/2154(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a special focus on all cross- border labour law issues, paying particular attention e.g. to pensions and posting of workers;
2013/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2013/2154(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes all measures to improve quality control, to establish uniform minimum requirements for the SOLVIT centres, and to improve visible links with other EU advisory networks;
2013/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2013/2154(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for a stepping-up of SOLVIT public relations work that is in touch with the people in order to significantly raise awareness of the SOLVIT centres by 2020 at the latest; welcomes the Commission's commitment to provide assistance to such activities;
2013/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2013/2154(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the Commission's recommendation regarding the need for providing information about alternative problem-solving networks or source of information, including other possible ways of redress, on both national and Union level, in cases ineligible for SOLVIT;
2013/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2013/2154(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Underlines the importance of spreading the knowledge about the SOLVIT cases database;
2013/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that all Member States have received recommendations with regard to levels of labour market participation; calls on those Member States with high levels of unemployment to step up, in consultation with the social partners, active labour market measures, such as training and employment services, and to introduce further reforms to facilitate access to employment, prevent early withdrawals from the labour market, reduce the cost of labour and combat labour market segmentation as well as match workers' skills with labour market demands;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the adoption of the Youth Guarantee by the Council and the earmarking of EUR 6 billion for Youth Employment Initiative as part of the next MFF; calls on Member States to implement Youth Guarantee Schemes and use available resources in an efficient way concentrating activities on those in the most difficult situation;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that the large economic and job potential of the services sector remains untapped; calls for full and appropriate implementation of the EU Services Directive; calls on Member States to remove barriers in the retail sector and excessive restrictions in professional services and regulated professions; at the same time calls to remove barriers to the free movement of workers in order to improve mobility and optimise the use of the EU human capital;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2013/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the crisis has had a severe and lasting impact on the Member States' levels of unemployment and their social situation, which has led to unsustainable increases in poverty and social exclusion, including child poverty, homelessness, in- work poverty and over-indebtedness of households; calls in this context on Member States to reinforce the safety nets and ensure the effectiveness of the welfare systems that deal with those affected as well as invest in preventive measures;
2013/07/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas illicitly employed workers suffer from secondary negative consequences such as the lack of access to training, the psychological constraints of having an accident or being caught, which in return affects the productivity of companies and the economy as a whole as well as from long- term consequences such as lack of right to old- age pension or very low pension benefits leading to a higher poverty risk;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas undeclared work is responsible for distortions of competition in the single market because it allows certain countries and companies to compete unfairly against others;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Highlights the problematic nature of labour inspection in respect of migrant workers from both EU and third countries, particularly in relation to the role and remit of national inspectorates; points out that national-level electronic systems, such as Belgium's LIMOSA system16 for the compulsory advance registration of foreign workers by employers, could substantially facilitate the task of labour inspection; __________________ 16 https://www.socialsecurity.be/foreign/de/e mployer_limosa/home.html.
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Points out that there is an important role to be played by the social partners, and particularly by workers' representatives, in ensuring that the existing rules are observed; calls on the Member States to institute the formal involvement of the social partners in labour inspection;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 106 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Draws attention to the specific situation of home workers and teleworkers who, in connection with their work at home or outside their employers’ place of work, can also be the subject of labour law abuses where employers fail to carry out their legal obligations towards them;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recognises that there is a growing trend towards self-employment, outsourcing und subcontracting; considers that systems of general contractor liability for the entire subcontracting chaincould constitute a useful tool for improved monitoring of public procurement, and that they should be introduced in all Member States;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on labour inspections to intensify well- targeted prevention and public education measures to increase the awareness of the importance of health and safety rules and procedures among citizens;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to introduce a European Agency fdevote adequate human resources to monitor cross-border matters concerning the abuse of employment protection rules and undeclared work, with a remit including inter alia the identification of letter-box companies, the control of transnational service providers, the introduction of further-training programmes, the identification ofto develop further- training programmes for inspectorates and to identify new ways of circumventing the rules, and the organisation of cross-border controlscome up with measures to support Member States in tackling undeclared work;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to introduceconsider introducing, after a thorough impact assessment, a forgery-proof European social security card, onr another EU wide identity document which would be stored all the data needed to verify the bearer's employment relationship, including details of social security coverstatus and working hours, for example, and which would be subject to strict data-protection rules;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 166 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to introduce a European early-warning system, for signalling breaches of employment protection rules and cases of undeclared work, which would promote the rapid exchange of information between Member States and would be accompanied by a blacklist so that abuses by employers could be nipped in the bud; points out that such an early-warning system could be modelled on the existing European consumer-protection early- warning system (RAPEX);deleted
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 172 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Considers that a European database on illegal employment can offer significant European added value in the effort to combat undeclared work;deleted
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Points out that the right of national inspection authorities to carry out inspections within non-national companies has hitherto been severely restricted; calls for A1 posting certificates to be entered in an EU-wide register in order to facilitate the control at national level of employment relationships among posted workers;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 192 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Criticises the Commission's suggestion, in relation to the directive on the enforcement of the Posting of Workers Directive, for closed lists of measures restricting national powers of inspection; considers it important that national labour inspectorates should be able to conduct inspections in every case where they deem it needful to do so;deleted
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. PointCalls outn that competition policy is implemented at European level; considers that, by the same token, measures to combat social dumping should be included in the EU treaties with provision for the Commission to implement them; considers that the Commission's powers in this regard should extend, as they do in the field of competition law, to the imposition of penalties on non-compliant companiee Commission to identify ways to better tackle social dumping cases in the EU and to come up with appropriate instruments;
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 220 #

2013/2112(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Considers it important that the Commission's rules against social dumping should be enshrined in a binding legal instrument; deems it necessary to introduce an EU-level labour inspection system for implementing the Commission's powers in this regard;deleted
2013/10/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the right to social security is a fundamental human right which is an integral parkey element of the European social model; whereas the International Labour Organisation (ILO) has adopted recommendations on ‘national floors of social protection’ with the aim of safeguarding the right of every individual to social security and to a decent standard of living;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the aim of social protection is an investment in human resources, enabling adaptation toto react in case of negative changes in the labour market and effective, action against poverty and social exclusion, as well as secure labour market integration; whereas social security has a stabilising effect on the economy and an anticyclical function that can boost domestic demand and consumption;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas, to tackledue to the crisis, Member States have made severe cuts in public expenditure just when social protection needed to be strengthened in response to a sudden rise in unemployment and, at the same time, national budgets for social security cover have been further squeezed as contributions have fallen in the wake of wide-scale job losses or wage cuts, thus placing the European social model at real risk;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 12 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, social protection coverage in the EU Member States is still inadequate; whereas cases of vulnerable workers being abused in the EU are still commonplace and labour-market compartmentalisation, withs a competence of the Member States, widely varying levels of protection for different types of contract and job relationship, is a glaring reality, may leading to social maladjustment and inequality;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas it is essential to lay down a clear definitionprevent abuses in case of bogus self- employment and to prevent abuses in this regard so as to avoid any violation of workers' social rights, any distortion of competition and any risk of social dumping;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas, given that the working conditions of self-employed people who are not economically independent are changing in ways not radically different from those of salaried workers, their social security and employment rights ought more closely to resemble salaried workers' rightsneed to be further looked at;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas social protection schemes for the self-employed need to take into consideration the fact that the self- employed represent an important force for innovation and economic growth in the EU and any intervention therein should enhance its development rather than jeopardise its existence;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on Member States to further develop the preventive arm of social security systems and put greater emphasis on activating measures;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to ensure responsible long-term financing of social security systems, particularly in periods of economic crisis, in order to ensure the adequacy of social benefits, while not overlooking the fact that one of the most important aspects of social investments is that they enable social and economic goals to be reconciled; considers, therefore, that they should be viewed as investment, rather than as expenditurein order to ensure their sustainability and the adequacy of social benefits;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that effective social protection should include measures to promote the participation of beneficiaries in the labour market, and that lowering the level of social protection will noto stimulate employment;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States especially to provide a guarantee ofdequate social security for the most vulnerable social groups such as the unemployed, the disabled, single-parent families, the young, pensioners and young families; calls also on the Member States to ensure that social services are made more accessible for all members of vulnerable social groups and persons with long-term care needs, particularly in rural areas;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 90 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to review legislation on the coordination of social security systems and draws Member States' attention to the fact that mobile workers should not be subjected to discriminatory social protection rules aimed at curbing benefit abuses; believes that all mobile workers should enjoy the samappropriate social security entitlements and cover;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Draws attention to the fact that the absence of a clear definitiondifferent statuses of self- employment considerably hampers theed among Member States require solutions for better coordination of social security for self- employed workers among the Member States and may consequentlyin order not to restrict the free movement of workers;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2013/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to draw up a conceptual framework that will provide a legal definition of the nature and different forms of atypical employment in general and self-employment as its most widespread form, applying labour law and social protection measures in line with the various forms of employment and providing foridentifying the possibility of properly regulating social security for self-employed workers; also considers it appropriate to clearly identify false self-employment and to sanction employers if such cases are identified;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2013/2073(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that special attention should be paid to vulnerable groups at high risk of social exclusion, including people who are not in education, employment or training (NEETs), and disadvantaged youth; points out that the way in which young people’s careers begin has a major impact on their subsequent development;
2013/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2013/2073(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the Commission’s proposals for a Quality Framework on Traineeships and an Alliance for Apprenticeships, aimed at promoting high-quality traineeships across the EU; calls, with this in mind, on the Member States to urgently implement the Youth Guarantee in order to combat youth unemployment, drawing effectively on the EUR 6 billion in EU funds available for the Youth Employment Initiative; calls on the Commission to give practical support to Member States implementing the Youth Guarantee; stresses that the Youth Guarantee must be integrated within the broader framework of active labour market policies while ensuring high standards;
2013/05/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the involvement of all relevant stakeholders, including training and education providers, individual employerregional and local authorities, public and private employment services, social partners, individual employers, training and education providers, third-sector organisations, and health and other authorities, is essential for the successful implementation of a variety of measures fostering youth employment and employability in an integrated fashion; emphasises that measures must be flexible so as to meet the continuously evolving needs on the labour market;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 164 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the decision of the EPSCO Council on 28 February 2013 to agree on a Council recommendation on implementing a Youth Guarantee; recommends extending eligibility to graduates aged under 30; stresses that the success of this measure will be highly dependent on other factors, e.g. the infrastructure and capacity of public and strengthened private employment services, the availability of student places, the provision of training and, apprenticeships, and the transferability and implementation of successful experiences from other Member States; stresses that the Youth Guarantee must be integrated within the broader framework of active labour market policies and monitored while ensuring high quality standards;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the Member States to boost their support for enterprises, cooperatives, local and regional authorities and third- sector organisations wishing to participate in Youth Guarantee schemes in close cooperation with public and private employment services, including through tax incentives, subsidies for fixed employment costs, and the possibility of accessing funding for on-site training, which will support enterprises in providing high-quality employment and training offers, and will represent an investment in young people's potential in an effective and targeted way;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to draw up in cooperation with local and regional authorities as well as with other potential stakeholders, further specific outreach strategies targeted on NEETs, which should combine effective forms of intervention aimed at tackling early school- leaving and the reintegration of early school-leavers with strategies facilitating a smooth transition from education to work, and an increase in the employability of young people, together with the removal of the practical and logistical barriers faced by young people with more complex needs;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 223 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to support young entrepreneurs and self-employment among young people by simplify an access to financial resources available for starting up their own business and creating facilities and preferential conditions for starting up their own businesses, through, e.g., cutting red tape and introducing favourable tax policies;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Highlights that, while internet economy creates 2.6 jobs for every "off line" job lost, it is important that young people turn e-skills in programming, design or social marketing into job using available European and national funding;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Member States to develop their Vocational education and training (VET) systems in accordance with labour market needs and demands and to promote continuous dialogue between the VET providers and employers to ensure that school- leavers have skills and competences adapted to employers'' expectations;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that the Alliance for Apprenticeship should also support European and national, regional and local campaigns for changing perceptions of vocational education, and should organise a regular forum for discussions on the monitoring of the European apprenticeship strategy with all relevant European and national stakeholders; stresses that incentives should also be provided to facilitate funding for crossborder training activities enabling companies and social partner organisations to become involved in establishing dual education systems;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 286 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Encourages the Member States to foster theregional and cross-border mobility of young workers by means of further progress towards the mutual recognition of qualifications and skills and enhanced coordination of national social security systems, especially as regards pension systems, as well as by continuing to invest substantially in language learning;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the need to introduce reforms to EURES with the aim of proactively matching jobseekers and job-changers to existing vacancies, and where necessary, to reform public employment services so as to better target their activities and approaches on young people; stresses that raising of awareness of EURES is needed so as to increase its visibility and availability, as a career advice system that supports students in becoming more aware of their aspirations and capabilities, as well as of existing job opportunities; Additionally, highlights a necessity of stronger coordination between EURES and other portals and services for citizens and business (i.e. Europe Direct information points or the European Enterprise Network for SMEs), in order to achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness of the services provided;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 308 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Call on Member States to take all necessary actions, aside potential intensified mobility, to prevent the phenomena of brain drain through sustainable measures which assure that a good proportion of the highly-skilled labour forces will retain in individual countries;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 317 #

2013/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Member States to develop personalised career counselling and guidance, starting already during secondary school, with the aim of enabling young people to make well-informed choices about their higfurther education, while introducing mechanisms that can monitor the opportunities offered and assess the success rate of those young people's subsequent transition to work;
2013/05/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2013/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on Member States to safeguard an inclusive and integrated eduqualifications system with a lifelong learning approach, providing equal access to all at all levels and offering tailor-made arrangements to meet the different needs of students, especially those from vulnerable social groups, such as Roma, migrants and disabled persons;
2013/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2013/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on Member States to facilitate transition between the different educational and training pathways, assist transition between education, professional training and employment, provide traineeships, work-based learning, apprenticeships and dual learning models and recognize competences based on non-formal and informal learning through accessible and high-quality validation system;
2013/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2013/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on Member States to develop policies promoting lifelong learning across all age groups, focused at developing skills and competences necessary to meet the challenges of dynamic changes in labour market demand.
2013/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2013/2041(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Calls on Member States to promote continuous dialogue between education and labour market to avoid risk of skills mismatches.
2013/05/06
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2013/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recommends that investment be channelled into human resources and emphasis laid on training and learning in order to anticipate, and respond to, the demand for skilled labour in e.g. industry oriented towards new technologies and an energy-efficient green economy;
2013/07/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2013/2006(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Suggests that information centres be set up in orderUnderlines the need to make entrepreneurs aware of the advantages to be gained from keeping their operations in, or relocating them to, Europe, and; suggests that EURES be exploited as efficiently as possible in order to make use of the skills of young European jobseekers and avert the abuses stemming froms well as calls on Member States to improve implementation of the Services Directive and the increasingeliminate instances of social dumping.
2013/07/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2013/0265(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. With effect from two years after the entry into force of this Regulation, payment service providers shall not offer or request a per transaction interchange fee or other agreed remuneration with an equivalent object or effect of more than 0,2.7 % of the value of the transaction for any debit card based transactions.
2014/01/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 225 #

2013/0265(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. With effect from two years after the entry into force of this Regulation, payment service providers shall not offer or request a per transaction interchange fee or other agreed remuneration with an equivalent object or effect of, on average, more than 0,3.7 % of the value of the transaction for any creddebit card based transactions.
2014/01/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 238 #

2013/0265(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a Hidden interchange fees 1. Three party payment card schemes impose hidden interchange fees which should be subject to a cap in the same way as the open interchange fees referred to in Articles 3 and 4 are. 2. In order to ensure compliance with this requirement, three party payment card schemes shall keep separate accounts for business activities connected with consumer card acquiring and for business activities connected with consumer card issuing. This should be done in the same way as it would were these activities carried out by legally separate entities, enabling the identification of all cost and revenue elements – as well as the basis for their calculation and a detailed explanation of the methods used – related to the schemes’ issuing and acquiring activities, including a detailed breakdown of fixed assets and structural costs.
2014/01/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 278 #

2013/0265(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10
Article 10 Honour All Card rules 1. Payment schemes and payment service providers shall not apply any rule that may oblige payees accepting cards and other payment instruments issued by one issuing payment service provider within the framework of a payment instruments scheme to also accept other payment instruments of the same brand and/or category issued by other issuing payment service providers within the framework of the same scheme, except if they are subject to the same regulated interchange fee. 2. The restriction of Honour all card rules referred to in paragraph 1 is without prejudice to the possibility for payments schemes and payment service providers to provide that certain cards may not be refused on the basis of the identity of the issuing payment service provider or of the cardholder. 3. Merchants deciding not to accept all cards or other payment instruments of a payment card scheme shall inform consumers in a clear and unequivocal manner at the same time as they inform the consumer on the acceptance of other cards and payment instruments of the scheme. That information shall be displayed prominently at the entrance of the shop, at the till or on the website or other applicable electronic or mobile medium, and shall be provided to the payer in good time before he enters into a purchase agreement with the payee. 4. Issuing payment service providers shall ensure that their payment instruments are visibly and electronically identifiable, enabling payees to identify unequivocally which brands and categories of prepaid, debit, credit or commercial cards or card based payments based on these are chosen by the payer.Deleted
2014/01/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2013/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) supporting the most vulnerable social groups with high unemployment rates, especially young people and older workers;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2013/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) increased voluntary geographical and occupational mobility;
2013/11/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 178 #

2013/0124(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide clear, easily accessible, comprehensive and up- to-date information on the rights conferred by the Union law on free movement of workers. . This information should also be, redress procedure and contact points, in a user friendly manner and easily accessible formats, also to persons with disabilities. This information should be available via a single national official website and other suitable means such as leaflets and also easily accessible through Your Europe and EURES.
2013/09/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Member States should also ensure that all functions necessary to the sustainable operations, maintenance, and development of the rail infrastructure will be managed in a consistent manner by the infrastructure manager itself, which does not prevent a Member State from having many managers operating on stand-alone rail lines or sections thereof.
2013/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 46 #

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 2012/34/EU
Article 3 - point 2
‘infrastructure manager’ means any body or firm ensuring, in particular, the development, operation and maintenance of railway infrastructure on a network; development includes network planning, financial and investment planning as well as building and upgrades of the infrastructure; operation of the infrastructure includes all elements of the process of train path allocation, including both the definition and the assessment of availability and the allocation of individual paths, traffic management and infrastructure charging, including determination and collection of the charges; maintenance shall includes infrastructure renewals and the other asset management activities;
2013/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2012/34/EU
Article 3 - point 5
(b) Point 5 is deleted;
2013/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2
Directive 2012/34/EU
Article 6 - paragraph 2
(2) In Article 6, paragraph 2 is deleted;
2013/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2013/0029(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3 – point 5
Directive 2012/34/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 5
Where on the date of entry into force of this Directive, the infrastructure manager belongs to a vertically integrated undertaking, Member States may decide not to apply paragraphs 2 to 4 of this Article. In such case, the Member State concerned shall ensure that the infrastructure manager performs all the functions referred to in Article 3(2) and has effective organisational and decision- making independence from any railway undertaking in accordance with the requirements set in Articles 7a to 7c.
2013/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 62 #

2013/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007
Article 2 – point c
‘competent local authority’ means any competent authority whose geographical area of competence is not national and which covers the transport needs of, for example, a region, an urban agglomeration or a rural district;
2013/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2013/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007
Article 2a – paragraph 1
Competent authorities shall establish and regularly update public passenger transport plans covering all relevant transport modes for the territory for which they are responsible. These public transport plans shall define the objectives of public transport policy and the means to implement them covering all relevant transport modes for the territory for which they are responsible. They shall at least include:
2013/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2013/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007
Article 2a – paragraph 1 – point e
other operational requirements such as transport of bicycles, traffic management, contingency plan in case of disturbances.
2013/09/27
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2012/2292(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Draws attention to Complaint No 85/2012, which is pending before the European Committee of Social Rights, in the Laval case, and calls for the right to implementation of cross-border collective measures to be granted;deleted
2013/05/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 24 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 20 November 2012 on Social Investment Pact- as a response to the crisis;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the employment and social consequences of the crisis are far-reaching, and are now exacerbated by the impact of fiscal consolidation introduced in certain countries in response to the sovereign debt crisis and a constricted monetary policy in the eurozone, which contrasts with that implemented by other major economic regions and is unable to give an effective response to the sovereign debt crisis and promote growth; whereas the crisis has negative effects on the quality and quantity of social investments in Europe; whereas the eurozone is in recession and the EU is currently the only major region in the world where unemployment is still rising;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
J a. whereas targeted social investments should be major part of Member States' response to the crisis as they are key to reaching the employment, social and education objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Member States to adopt measures favourable to job creation such as labour tax reforms that provide employment incentives, promote and support self-employment and business start-ups, improve the framework for doing business, facilitate access to financing for SMEs, transform informal and undeclared work into regular employment, reform labour markets to make them more adaptive, dynamic and inclusive, provide employers with skills and instruments that enable them to adopt to changing labour markets; modernise wage-setting systems to align wages with productivity developments, exploit the high employment potential of sectors such as the green economy, health and social care, and the ICT sector to create jobs.
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 188 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
62. Calls on the Member States to improve the adequacy and effectiveness of social protection systems and to ensure that these continue to act as buffers against poverty and social exclusion; at the same time notes that the European Social Model requires modernisation in the direction of 'activating welfare states', that invest in people and provide instruments and incentives with a view to create sustainable jobs and growth as well as prevent social distortions;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2012/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 70 a (new)
70 a. Calls on the European Council and the Commission to better integrate the monitoring and evaluation of employment, social and education goals of the Europe 2020 strategy in the European Semester 2013;
2012/12/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Title 1
1st pillarPublic pensions system
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 10 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A – indent 5
– the importance of avoiding gender inequalities in pensions, resulting in particular from imbalances in the way men and women participate in the reconciliation of work and care;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas in many EU countries fertility rates remain low, leading to a drop in the number of people of working age in the future;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Title 2
2nd pillarOccupational pensions
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 40 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas falling employment and rising unemployment has hurt pay-as-you-go pension schemes, while funded systems are hit by disappointing financial markets returns;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Reminds that the Pension Funds Directive applies only to voluntary pension schemes and does not cover any instruments being part of the obligatory public pension scheme.
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 76 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their budgetpublic finances and reform their economies under austere conditions; subscribes, therefore, to the view expressed in the Commission's White Paper that people will need to build up complementary occupational and if possible private pension savings;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that first-pillarpublic pension schemes remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to implement reforms to their first-pillarpublic systems aligning contributory years and retirement age to the changing ratio between pensioners and people in working age, also to prevent public pension costs crowding out other important government spending, particularly social investments; calls on the Member States to ensure first-pillarpublic pension schemes - if necessary complemented by minimum income provisions - to provide a decent minimum income;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2012/2234(INI)

Draft opinion
Title 3
3rd pillarPrivate pension savings
2012/12/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point i
i. a public, first-pillar, pension system, that would include either or both pay-as-you-go and funded component, with a guarantee of a decent minimum pension;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point ii
ii. a funded,widely accessible employment-related, mandatory collective second-pillar occupational pension funds, preferably governed by (sectoral) social partners;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point iii
iii. an individual third-pillar pension based on privateprivate pension savings;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a comprehensive solution to the pension challenge, taking into account the need to work longer, to adapt working conditions and promote lifelong learning so as to enable people to work longer, consensus between governments and social partners is paramount;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 171 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the main thrust of the White Paper that suggests focusing on: balancing time spent in work and retirement; developing complementary occupational and private pension savings, and enhancing the EU's pension monitoring tools and pension literacy;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the social partners to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to create adequate working conditions and come up with programmes to ensure that employees can work longer; calls on workers to engage actively in available training opportunities and programmes that enable people to keep themselves fit for the labour market at all stages of their working life;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that the Commission should rather recommend collective mandatory occupational pension savings, as collective (second pillar)occupational pension systems - usually governed by (sectoral) social partners - allow for solidarity within and between generations, whereas individual schemes do not; stresses the need to start building up complementary occupational pension systems now, despite the crisis;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 300 #

2012/2234(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Questions the need for an EU pension fund for researchers;deleted
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2012/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 4
4. Calls for a balanced interaction between economic policies on the one hand and employment and social policies on the other hand since, modernizing the European social model iso that it can be a driver of economic competitiveness without which the Union's social market economy will not be able to climb out of the rut;
2012/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2012/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 6 – indent 1
– the introduction of a European Youth GuaranteeOpportunity;
2012/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2012/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 6 – indent 2
decentaccessible public services;
2012/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2012/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 6 – indent 3
decent living wageswages, which do not cause in-work poverty;
2012/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2012/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 6 – indent 4
– social housing guaranteed exclusively to the socially excluded, complemented by activating measures;
2012/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2012/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 6 – indent 5
– a social protection floor to guarantee equal access to essential health services, income support and subsistence security;
2012/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2012/2151(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to strengthen and promote fair mobility and step up the fight against social dumping due to the misuse of posted workers, both in host and home countrie, which may constitute a solution to growing unemployment, with strong regard to workers' rights;
2012/09/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2012/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to be more explicit in its recommendations and further to monitor recommendations made in the past, including a more detailed explanation and evaluation in those cases where the Commission thinks a country has only partially followed the recommendations; urges the Commission to take social policy achievements into account in its recommendations;
2012/09/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 70 #

2012/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Encourages the Member States to strictly follow the rules set by the Stability and Growth Pact, as modified by the ‘six- pack’, in order to render public finances more resilient and ensure that the European economy becomes more sustainable, as well as reducing pressure from the banking sector; expects the Commission and the Council to strictly enforce these rules; firmly believes that fiscal discipline and fiscal institutions should be strengthened at both national and sub-national level and that government expenditure should be shifted towards long-term investment and social investment, which would foster sustainable growth and higher employment, as well as progress on social inclusion;
2012/09/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2012/2144(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. With a view to improve employment level and job creation in Europe, supports initiatives that aim at continuous opening up of national service markets and providing legal certainty through improvement of national rules on cross- border provision of services.
2012/12/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that access to finance is crucial for funding business investment, ensuring businesses reach their growth potential, and for facilitating new business start-ups, thereby contributing to future growth and, preserving current jobs and new job creation;
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes support for SMEs and micro- enterprises through initiatives such as PSCI, COSME and Horizon 2020, which creates opportunities for employees within thprovide new ways of developing the skills and knowledge that enable SMEs and micro-enterprise sectors to develop their skills and knowledge basedynamically;
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that, despite successful EU initiatives such as the Late Payments Directive, serious barriers exist to the start- up and development of SMEs, such as restricted access to finance and the high cost of finance, which can impact on SMEs’ ability to createpreserve existing jobs and cretain staffate new ones;
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that a lack of knowledge and information can affect the supply of both debt and equity finance to SMEs, resulting in potentially viable businesses being refused finance, which inhibits the development or creation of viable SMEs and microenterprises;(Does not affect English version.) (Referring only to Polish version.)
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the strengthened SME test, which ensures that any new measures doll available options are evaluated regularly during the development of new legislative proposals in such a way as not to place disproportionate burdens on SMEs or micro-enterprises;
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2012/2134(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to consider the strong social and economic arguments in favour of using existing EU initiatives to equip potential and existing SME owners with the appropriate skills, tools and knowledge required for successful financial management.(Does not affect English version.) (Referring only to Polish version.)
2019/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
having regard to the study entitled ‘EMN Synthesis Report: satisfying labour demand through migration’, European Parliament, 2011,(Does not affect English version.) (Linguistic amendment: concerns only the Polish version.)
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
– having regard to Directive 2011/98/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third- country workers legally residing in a Member State1, 1 OJ L 343, 23.12.2011, p. 1.
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 94 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to draw up and introduce a common, criteria-based European points system European credit accumulation and transfer system based on transparent criteria, in keeping with the European Qualification Framework approach and open to the Member States on a voluntary basis; asserts that it should be possible to adjust such a system to labour-market conditions so as to make it easier to attract urgently needed skilled workers;
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission, in connection with the proposed pointscredit accumulation and transfer system, to consider developing an international platform on EURES for standardised job and skills profiles, in order to facilitate the recruitment of job- seeking migrants and the comparison of their capabilities;
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 102 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises that by participating in the pointscredit accumulation and transfer system Member States would become more attractive to qualified third- country nationals, for whom it would constitute a simplification;
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States, in spite and because of the constant shortage of skilled workers, not to lose sight of mobility within the EU and thus to place the recruitment and integration of EU citizens from other Member States in the forefront, in particular in view of the constant shortage of skilled workers;
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 118 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Member States to bring appropriate tools and instruments to bear to remedy labour market shortages, primarily by means of intra-EU mobility;
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Asks that migrants should have easier access to the labour market and that they should be able to rely on the quick and inexpensive recognition and validation of their diplomas, qualifications and skills acquired through formal, non-formal and informal learning;
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2012/2131(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Draws attention to the need for appropriate information systems to be developed for migrants, including as regards access to relevant programmes and services, enabling potential migrants to make a proper assessment of the costs and benefits of migrating and helping them to decide whether to do so;
2012/11/12
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2012/2098(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that co- and self-regulation cannot be a substitute for appropriate regulation in anythe development of CSR should be based, above all, on self- regulation and self-organisation of the mareas covered by CSR, but believes that it could underpin existing ket; notes, at the same time, that the public administration should provide support by creating approprivate and voluntary CSR initiatives by establishing minimum principles to ensure consistency, materiality, multi-stakeholder input and transparencyconditions for CSR cooperation and providing appropriate tools and instruments, such as an incentive system;
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2012/2098(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Fully supports the Commission’s intention to bring forward a legislative proposal on ‘non-financial disclosure’ by business; warns that use of the term ‘non- financial’ should not disguise the very real financial consequences for business of social, environmental and human rights impacts; calls for an ambitious proposal which places the EU at the heart of the many current international initiatives on mandatory corporate sustainability reporting and which is fully in line with the objective of making Integrated Reporting, as currently developed by the IIRC, the global norm by the end of the decadeAgrees that the issue of ‘non-financial disclosure’ by business requires further consideration; stresses, however, that any solutions must not create excessive administrative burdens, particularly not for SMEs; warns that use of the term ‘non- financial’ should not disguise the very real financial consequences for business of social, environmental and human rights impacts;
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2012/2098(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that the link between good corporate responsibility and good corporate governance can only be achieved if CSR is a mainstream, among other things, CSR is a part of the company affecting its day-to-day financial strategy; believes that the Commission should explore opportunities to ensure that CSR strategy is agreed at board level.
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2012/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that future key drivers for ‘scaling up’ CSR will include an emphasis on global CSR instruments, fresh momentum from leading businesses among their peers, the use of appropriate regulationself-regulation and self-organisation of the market, support from the public administration for initiatives through the creation of appropriate conditions for CSR cooperation and the provision of appropriate tools and instruments, such as an incentive system, a robust impact analysis of existing CSR initiatives, and increasing recognition within both the business community and wider society of the scale of global social and environmental challenges;
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2012/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Fully supports the Commission’s intention to put forward a legislative proposal onAgrees that the issue of ‘non-financial disclosure’ by businesses requires further consideration; warns that use of the term ‘non-financial’ should not disguise the very real financial consequences for business of social, environmental and human-rights- related impact; calls for an ambitious proposal which places the EU right among the many current international initiatives on mandatory corporate sustainability reporting and squarely within the objective of making Integrated Reporting, as being developed by the IIRC, the global norm by the end of the decadestresses, however, that any solutions must not create excessive administrative burdens, particularly not for SMEs;
2012/11/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the majority of recent responses to the crisis were based mainly on short- term goals aimed at restoring stability to public finances, being crucial efforts to defend our economy, and whereas these austerity measures cshould have negative long-term effects on employment,be completed with growth- and competitiveness if not completed withemployment-friendly measures in order to restore employment, growth- and employment-friendly measurescompetitiveness in Europe;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the crisis requires a modernisation of the European Social Model, a rethinking of national social policies and a transition from an ‘active welfare state’, that omainly responds to emerging damages caused by market failure and is based on redistribution of public resources, to an ‘activating welfare state’, that invests in people and gives citizens instruments and incentives that will help them to adapt to changing economic and social conditions;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point a a (new)
a a) fight youth unemployment;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages those Member States who have not done it yet to introduce necessary reforms in order to improve the sustainability of their pension systems, increase the statutory retirement age and limit early retirement possibilities, and to combine this with the constant improvement of working conditions and the implementation of lifelong training schemes enabling longer professional careers;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2012/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on Member States to consider signing to a ‘Social Investment Pact’, through which they would create a reinforced control mechanism for improving efforts to meet employment, social and education targets of Europe 2020; this 'Social Investment Pact', like e.g. the 'Euro Plus Pact', could contain a list of specific measures in form of social investments to be taken by Member States in a given timeframe in order to meet the employment, social and education targets of Europe 2020 and to restore employment, growth and competitiveness; these commitments should be subject to the regular surveillance framework with a strong role for the European Commission and the involvement of all relevant formations of the Council;
2012/05/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In order to provide for the single supervisory mechanism, Council Regulation (EU) No …/… [127(6) Regulation] confers specific tasks on the ECB concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions in the Member States whose currency is the euro. Other Member States may enter in a close cooperation with the ECB. Under that Regulation, the ECB is to coordinate and express the position of those Member States on the decisions to be taken by the Board of Supervisors of the European Banking Authority (EBA) falling within the scope of the ECB tasks.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 111 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) Bearing in mind that the EBA, in works of which all Member States participate with equal rights, was established with an aim to develop the single rulebook and ensure the coherence of supervisory practices within the EU and given the establishment of the single supervisory mechanism with a leading role of the ECB, the EBA needs to be equipped with adequate instruments, which will enable it to efficiently perform its entrusted tasks concerning the integrity of the single market in the area of financial services.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 118 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) In view of the supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB by Council Regulation (EU) No …/….../... [127(6) Regulation], EBA should be able to carry out its tasks also in relation to the ECB. In order to ensure that existing mechanisms for settlement of disagreements and actions in emergency situations remain effective, a specificcommon procedure, binding for all competent authorities, should be provided for. In particular, if the competent authority, including the ECB, does not comply with an action by EBA to settle a disagreement or to address an emergency situation, it should be required to explain its reasons. In that case, whenever based on requirements set out in directly applicable Union law EBA can adopt an individual decision addressed to the financial institution concerned, it should do so.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 123 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5 a) The mandate of the EBA to settle disagreements, involving the ECB with regard to cases concerning prudential supervision, can be inferred from the fact that both the establishment of the EBA and the conferment of specific supervisory tasks on the ECB have been introduced through secondary law.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 127 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In order to ensure that interests of all Member States are adequately taken into account and to allow for the proper functioning of the EBA with a view to maintain and deepen the internal market in the field of financial services, the voting modalities within the Board of Supervisors should be adapted, in particularboth with regard to decisions taken by the EBA at simple majority and decisions taken at qualified majority.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 136 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Decisions concerning breaches of Union law and settlement of disagreements should be examined by an independent panel composed of voting members of the Board of Supervisors which do not have any conflicts of interest, appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The decisions proposed by the panel to the Board of Supervisors should be considered as adopted uonless rejected by a simple majority, which should include an adequate number of votes from members from Member Sy if accepted by the Board of Supervisors at simple majority in two separate votings, one of which tatkes participating in the SSM and from Member States that do not participate in the SSMlace in the group of the Member States with common euro currency and the second in the group of remaining Member States.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 141 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The members of the independent panel set up according to Article 41(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 should not be considered to be in a situation of conflict of interest on the sole ground that they are, in particular, in cases when they representatives of the competent authoritiesy, which are part of the SSM and a given case to be decided upon by the Panel concerns the SSMhas jurisdiction within the Member State, in which the concerned credit institution operates. The EBA should develop rules of procedure for the panel that ensure its independence and objectivity.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 144 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) Since the Member States which entered into close cooperation with the SSM are devoid of voting rights in the Governing Council of the ECB, which results in a lack of effective influence on the decision making process within the SSM, a special procedure for settlement of disagreements between the ECB and a competent authority of a Member State which has entered into close cooperation shall be established, which will compensate for the absence of forceful instruments to sway the decision making process taken within the SSM and at the same time, will safeguard the right to protect justified interests, in particular the stability of the local financial market. To that end, the EBA should be equipped with the ultimate authority to settle disagreements between the ECB and the competent authority of a Member State that has entered into close cooperation with the SSM.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 148 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The composition of the Management Board should be balanced and proper representation of Member States participating in the SSM, remaining in the close cooperation, and not participating in the SSM should be ensured.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 18 – paragraph 3a
"3a. Where the Authority requests the ECB as competent authority to take the necessary action in accordance with paragraph 3, the ECBcompetent authority shall comply with it or shall provide within 48 hours at the latest adequate justification to the Authority for its non-compliance."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 197 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 18 – paragraph 3a
"3a. Where the Authority requests the ECB as competent authority to take the necessaryspecific action or to refrain from action in accordance with paragraph 3, the ECBcompetent authority shall comply with it or shall provide within 48 hours at the latestwithin ten working days of the receipt of the request provide adequate justification to the Authority for its non-compliance."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 204 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 19a (new)
3 b. The following Article is inserted after Article 19: "Article 19a In a situation when the competent authority, which entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with Regulation (EU) No .../... [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation] does not agree with the final supervisory decision adopted by the SSM regarding a credit institution operating in the Member State of its jurisdiction, it has the right to veto the execution of every such decision and refer it to the independent panel, mentioned in the Article 41, established by the EBA. The decision proposed by the independent panel shall be considered as adopted only if accepted by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with Article 44."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 213 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 35 – paragraph 3
"3. Upon a duly justified request from a competent authority, the Authority mayshall provide any information that is necessary to enable the competent authority to carry out its duties, in accordance with the professional secrecy obligations laid down in sectoral legislation and in Article 70."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 222 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 41 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
"For the purposes of Article 17 and 19, the Board of Supervisors shall establish an independent panel consisting of the Chairperson and twofour members appointed by the Board of Supervisors among its voting members. At least onetwo members of the independent panel shall be from a Member State which is not a participating Member State in accordance with Regulation (EU) No …/… [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation]currency is not the euro, at least one of which shall be from a Member State not exercising close cooperation with the SSM either."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 224 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 41 – paragraph 3
"3. The panel shall propose a decision for final adoption by the Board of Supervisors, in accordance with the procedure set out in the third subparagraph of Article 44(1)members of the panel shall act independently, objectively in accordance with Article 42 and shall not be in a situation of conflict of interest. It shall be recognized that the members of the panel remain in a situation of conflict of interests, in particular, in cases when they represent the competent authority, which has the jurisdiction within the Member State, in which the concerned credit institution operates."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 226 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) 1093/2010
Article 41 – paragraph 4
"4. The Board of Supervisors shall adopt rules of procedure for the panel referred to in paragraph 2, including rules implementing the requirement set out in the second subparagraph of that paragraphBy way of derogation from paragraph 2, from the date when the euro is not the currency of only two Member States, the independent panel shall consist of a Chairperson and two members appointed by the Board of Supervisors, among its voting members. At least one member of such an independent panel shall be from a Member State in which currency is not the euro."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 230 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 42
6. In Article 42 the following paragraph is added: "The first and second paragraphs are without prejudice to the tasks conferred upon the ECB by Regulation (EU) No …/… [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation]."deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 236 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
"1. Decisions of the Board of Supervisors shall be taken by a simple majority of its memberin two separate votings, one of which takes place in the group of the Members States with common euro currency and the second in the group of remaining Member States. Each member shall have one vote."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 241 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
"With regard to the acts specified in Articles 10 to 16 and measures and decisions adopted under the third subparagraph of Article 9(5) and Chapter VI and by way of derogation from the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the Board of Supervisors shall take decisions on the basis of a qualified majority of its members, as defined in Article 16(4) of the Treaty on European Union and in Article 3 of the Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions, however the decisions to be passed shall be supported in parallel by at least simple majority of weighted votes in the group Member States with common euro currency, as well as in the group of remaining Member States."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 246 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
"With regard to decisions in accordance with Articles 17, 19, and 19a, the decision proposed by the panel shall be considered as adopted uonless it is rejected by a simple majority which shall include at least three votes from members of participating Member Sy if accepted by the Board of Supervisors at a simple majority in two separate votings, one of which tatkes and three votes from members ofplace in the group of the Members States which are neither participating Member States in accordance with Regulation (EU) No …/…[127(6) TFEU Council Regulation] nor have entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with that Regulationith common euro currency and the second in the group of remaining Member States. Each member shall have one vote."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 249 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 44 –paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
"By way of derogation from the third subparagraph, from the date when four or less Member States are neither participating Member States in accordance with Regulation (EU) No …/… [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation] nor have entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with that Regulationthe euro is not the currency in only four Member States, the decision proposed by the panel shall be considered as adopted uonless it is rejected byy if accepted by the Board of Supervisors at a simple majority which shall include at least one vote from members of those Member States. Each member shall have one vote."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 252 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation EU No 1093/2010
Article 44 –paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5
"By way of derogation from the third subparagraph, from the date when the euro is not the currency in three or less Member States, the decision proposed by the panel shall be considered as adopted, only if accepted by the Board of Supervisors at a qualified majority of five- sixths of its members. Each member shall have one vote."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 253 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation EU No 1093/2010
Article 44 –paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5 a (new)
"The independent panel, mentioned in Article 41, with regard to decisions in accordance with Articles 17, 19, and 19a takes the decision at a qualified majority of four-fifths of its members. From the date when the euro is not the currency in only two Member States, the independent panel takes decisions by simple majority."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 264 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation EU No 1093/2010
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
"The term of office of the members elected by the Board of Supervisors shall be 2 1/2 years. That term may be extended once. The composition of the Management Board shall be balanced and proportionate and shall reflect the Union as a whole. The Management Board shall include at least twohree representatives from Member States in which are not participating Member States in accordance with Regulation [127(6) TFEU Council Regulation] nor havecurrency is not the euro, at least two of which come from the Member States, which did not entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with that RegulationSSM either. Mandates shall be overlapping and an appropriate rotating arrangement shall apply."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 266 #

2012/0244(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 58 – paragraph 3
8 b. Article 58(3) is replaced by the following: "3. Two members of the Board of Appeal and two alternates shall be appointed by the Management Board of the Authority from a short-list proposed by the Commission, following a public call for expressions of interest published in the Official Journal of the European Union, and after consultation of the Board of Supervisors. At least one member and his alternate should come from a Member State which currency is not the euro, nor has entered into close cooperation with the ECB in accordance with that Regulation. The other members shall be appointed in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010."
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 90 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Competence for supervision of individual banks in the Union remains mostly at national level. This limits the effectiveness of supervision and the ability of supervisors to reach a common understanding of the soundness of the banking sector throughout the UnionCoordination between supervisors is vital but the crisis has shown that mere coordination is not enough, in particular in the context of a single currency. In order to preserve and increase the positive effects of market integration on growth and welfare, integration of supervisory responsibilities should therefore be enhanced.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 214 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Additional capital buffers, including a capital conservation buffer and a countercyclical capital buffer to ensure that credit institutions accumulate during periods of economic growth a sufficient capital base to absorb losses in stressed periods, are key prudential tools to ensure the availability of adequate loss absorbency. The ECB should have the task to impose such buffers and ensure credit institutions comply with them.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 265 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In order to ensure consistency between supervisory responsibilities conferred on the ECB and decision making within the EBA, the ECB should coordinate a common position amongst representatives of the national authorities of the participating Member States in relation to matters falling within its competence.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 284 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) As regards the supervision of cross- border banks active both inside and outside the Euro area the ECB should cooperate closely with the competent authorities of non participating Member States. As a competent authority the ECB should be subject to the related obligations to cooperate and exchange information under Union law and should participate fully in the colleges of supervisors. In addition, since the exercise of supervisory tasks by a European institution brings about clear benefits in terms of financial stability and sustainable market integration, Member States not participating in the common currency should therefore also have the possibility to participate in the new mechanism. However, it is a necessary pre-condition for an effective exercise of supervisory tasks, that supervisory decisions are implemented fully and without delay. Member States wishing to participate in the new mechanism should therefore undertake to ensure that their national competent authorities will abide by and adopt any measure in relation to credit institutions requested by the ECB. The ECB should be able to establish a close cooperation with the competent authorities of a Member State not participating in the common currency. It should be obliged to establish the cooperation where the conditions set out in this regulation are met. The conditions under which representatives of the competent authorities of the Member States which established a close co-operation take part to the activities of the Supervisory Board should allow the greatest possible involvement of those represenensure equal treatment of all participating Member Statives taking into account the limits following from the Statute of ESCB and of the ECB, in particular as regards the integrity of its decision making process.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 320 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) The conferral of supervisory tasks implies a significant responsibility for the ECB to safeguard financial stability in the Union, and to use its supervisory powers in the most effective and proportionate way. The ECB should therefore be accountable for the exercise of these tasks towards the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers respectively the Eurogroup as democratically legitimised institutions representing the European people and the Member States. That should include regular reporting and responding to questions. Where national supervisors take action under this Regulation, accountability arrangements provided under national law should continue to apply.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 395 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 a (new)
(47a) Whereas the pending financial crisis contributed immensely to the fragmentation of European financial markets, it is indispensable to enhance the common integrated financial framework. However, it should be borne in mind that the deepening of integration in the EMU cannot give rise to new, not outlined in the Treaties, convergence criteria, which can create additional barriers to entry for countries under a temporary derogation.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 396 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 b (new)
(47b) Whereas, efforts to secure financial stability within the EU require a diversified approach to distinctive types of risks in different markets and considering that the economies of the Member States, including those in the EMU, remain heterogeneous and that economic cycles are not synchronized, it should be borne in mind that according to the ESRB Recommendation (ESRB/2011/3) and standard no. 138 of Basel III, effective response to the problems of macroeconomic imbalances necessitates the use of discretionary instruments at local level. Moreover, the scope to customize macroprudential instruments is of the utmost significance to the Member States remaining in the EMU, due to their inability to use macroeconomic automatic stabilizers, such as interest rate or exchange rate.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 409 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation confers on the ECB specific tasks concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions, with a view to promoting the safety and soundness of credit institutions and the stability of the financial system within the EU and each Member State, with due regard for the unity and integrity of the internal market.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 413 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) 'participating Member State' means a Member State whose currency is the euro; or a Member State whose currency is not the euro, which has entered into a close cooperation in accordance with Article 6.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 474 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) To impose capital buffers to be held by credit institutions in addition to own funds requirements referred to in (c), including setting countercyclical buffer rates and any other measures aimed at addressing systemic or macro-prudential risks in the cases specifically set out in Union acts;deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 496 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) To carry out supervisory tasks in relation to early intervention where a credit institution does not meet or is likely to breach the applicable prudential requirements, including recovery plans and intra group financial support arrangements, in coordination with the relevant resolution authorities;
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 504 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) To coordinate and express a common position of representatives from competent authorities of the participating Member States when participating in the Board of Supervisors and the Management Board of the European Banking Authority, for issues relating to the tasks conferred on the ECB by this Regulation.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 525 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Subject to and in compliance with any relevant Union law rule and in particular any legislative and non-legislative act including technical standards developed by EBA and adopted by the Commission, the ECB may adopt regulations and recommendations and take decisions to implement or apply Union law, to the extent necessary to carry out the tasks conferred upon it by this Regulation, and only where those Union acts, do not deal with certain aspects necessary for the proper exercise of the ECB's tasks or do not deal with them in sufficient detail. Before adopting a regulation, the ECB shall conduct open public consultations, including EBA and the Commission, and analyse the potential related costs and benefits.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 588 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. National competent authorities shall follow the instructions given by the ECB for the purposes of the tasks mentioned in Article 4(1). Instructions given by the ECB shall not interfere with the exercise of voting rights by competent authorities of participating Member States within the Board of Supervisors and the Management Board of the European Banking Authority.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 615 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. Within the limits set out in this Article, the ECB shall carry out the tasks in the areas referred to in Article 4 (1) and (2) in relation to credit institutions established in a participating Member State whose currency is not the euro, where a close cooperation has been established between the ECB and the national competent authority of such Member State in accordance with this Article.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 620 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
To that end, the ECB may address guidelines or requests to the national competent authority of the non participating Member State, whose currency is not the euro.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 627 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The close cooperation between the ECB and the national competent authority of a non participating Member State, whose currency is not the euro, shall be established, by a decision adopted by the ECB, where the following conditions are met:
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 639 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The decision referred to in paragraph 2 shall determine, in compliance with the Statute of ESCB and of the ECB, the conditions under which representatives of the competent authorities of the Member States which established a close cooperation in accordance with this Article shall take part to the activities of the Supervisory Board.deleted
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 650 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Member State that has established a close cooperation with ECB may request the ECB to terminate the close cooperation at any time. In this case, the ECB shall immediately proceed to adopt a decision terminating the close cooperation. The decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall specify the date from which it is legally valid.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 812 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The planning and execution of the tasks conferred upon the ECBdrafting of decisions to be taken by the ECB with regards to supervisory tasks conferred upon it by this Regulation, shall be undertaken by an internal body composed of four representatives of the ECB appointed by the Executive Board of the ECB and one representative of the national authority competent for the supervision of credit institutions in each participating Member State (hereinafter ‘s'Supervisory bBoard').
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 829 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. In addition, the supervisory board shall include a Chair elected by the members of the Governing Couperson. Appointment shall be made on the basis of merit, skills, knowledge of financial institutions and markets, and of experience relevant to financial from the members, with the exception of the Presidsupervision and regulation, following an open selection procedure. The Chairperson shall be appointed by common accord of the government,s of the Executive Board, and a Vice-Chair elected by and from the members of the Governing Council of the ECBMember States at the level of Heads of State or Government, on a recommendation from the supervisory board, after it has consulted the Council and the European Parliament. The Supervisory Board elects from among its members two Vice-Chairmen.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 839 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The Governing Council of the ECB may delegate clearly defined supervisory tasks and relatedFor the purpose of paragraph 1 the Governing Council of the ECB authorises the Supervisory Board to draft decisions regarding individual or a set of identifiable credit institutions, financial holding companies or mixed financial holding companies to the supervisory board, subject to. The Supervisory Board proposes a decision for final adoption by the Goversight and responsibility of the Governing Councilning Council. The decision proposed by the Supervisory Board shall be considered as adopted unless it is rejected by the Governing Council. The Governing Council can only accept or reject the proposed decision. If the Governing Council rejects the proposed decision, it shall be returned to the Supervisory Board for a review.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 860 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. The Chair of the European Banking Authority and, a member of the European Commission may participate as observers in the meetings of the supervisory boardand chairmen of national competent authorities from Member States remaining outside the SSM may participate as observers in the meetings of the supervisory board on condition that their request has been accepted by the supervisory board by simple majority. The Supervisory board may, if appropriately justified, restrict observers' access to confidential data.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 864 #

2012/0242(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 7
7. The Governing Council shall adopt the rules of procedure of the supervisory board includingand shall make them public. They shall ensure equal treatment of all participating Member States, including voting rights. They shall also include rules on the term of office of the Chair and the Vice-Chair. The term of off, whiceh shall not exceed five years and shall not be renewable.
2012/10/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 90 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Competent authorities shall make an overall assessment of all factual elements in order to determine if the worker is genuinely posted. If the proof cannot be produced, Member States involved shall collaborate closely and with no delay in order to choose which law is applicable to the employment contract, basing themselves on the Rome I Regulation.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) For the purpose of ensuring that a posted worker receives the correct pay and provided allowances specific to posting can be considered part of minimum rates of pay, such allowances should only be deducted from wages if national law, collective agreements and/or practice of the host Member State provide for this. It is up to the national law of the Member State of establishment if the employer is obliged to provide or reimburse the costs of travel, board, lodging/accommodation. It is however up to the national law of the host Member State if it is included in the minimum wage.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Member States shall take appropriate measures in order to prevent the misuse and/or circumvention of the Directive 96/71/EC and this Directive by the undertakings for the purpose of depriving posted workers of their rights or the withholding of such rights.
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 206 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Notwithstanding the establishment of more uniform rules with respect to the cross-border enforcement of penalties and fines and the need for more common criteria for follow-up procedures in the event of the non-payment of these they should not affect the Member States’ competences to determine their system of penalties, sanctions and fines or the recovery measures available under their internal legislat(Does not affect English version.)
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) Member States should take appropriate measures in the event of failure to comply with the obligations laid down in this Directive, including administrative and judicial procedures, and should provide for effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalties for any breaches of the obligations under this Directive.(Does not affect English version.)
2013/01/17
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 360 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) travel, board and lodging/accommodation is provided or reimbursed by the employer who posts the worker, and if so, how this is done; as well as(Does not affect English version.)
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 434 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) make the information available to workers and service providers in, free of charge, in English and in other most relevant languages other than the national language(s) of the country in which the services are provided, if possible in summarised leaflet form indicating the main labour conditions applicable and upon requests in formats accessible to persons with disabilities;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 456 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The undertaking shall inform in writing its workers about their rights during the period of their posting. Analogously, the contractor present in the host Member State shall inform in writing its foreign subcontractors about the terms and conditions of employment in force in the host Member State.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 522 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Member States are encouraged to establish points of information and practical help for the posted workers in order to ensure that they dispose of a proper knowledge about their rights. The place of the information points and the language coverage shall be decided upon an estimation of the presence of posted workers in the territory of the Member State concerned. This applies to both the Member State of establishment and the host Member State, since it is equally important to provide the worker with the information before his/her departure and during his/her period of posting.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 595 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
d) an obligation to designate a contact person to negotiate, if necessary, on behalf of the employer with the relevant social partners in the Member State to which the posting takes place, in accordance with national legislation and practice, during the p(Does not affect English versiod in which the services are provided.n.)
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 656 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. In Member States where, in accordance with national law and practice, the setting of the terms and conditions of employment of posted workers referred to in Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC, and in particular the minimum rates of pay, including and working time, is left to management and labour they may, at the appropriate level and subject to the conditions laid down by the Member States, also the monitor the application of the relevant terms and conditions of employment of posted workers, provided that an adequate level of protection equivalent to that resulting from Directive 96/71/EC and this Directive is guaranteed.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 683 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) any outstanding remuneration which, under the applicable terms and conditions of employment is due and/or contributions due to common funds or institutions of social partners covered by Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC, would have been due;
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 690 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) any back-payments or refund of taxes or social security contributions unduly withheld from the worker's salary.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 693 #

2012/0061(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The mechanisms referred to in paragraph 5 may include a system which provides on a non-discriminatory basis with regard to the protection of the equivalent rights of employees of direct subcontractors established in the host Member State territory that the contractor of which the employer (service provider or temporary employment undertaking or placement agency) is a direct subcontractor can, in addition to or in place of the employer, be held liable by the posted workers and/or common funds or institutions of social partners for non- payment of the sums described in paragraph 5.
2013/01/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Is deeply concerned about the fact that the current national targets are not even in theory sufficient to achieve the EU2020 headline targets for employment, education and poverty reduction; urges the European Council to ensure that Member States step up their national targets and that these are accompanied by concrete and realistic roadmaps for implementation and assessed using clear and consistent indicators drawing on the agreed Joint Assessment Framework, so that the EU is put on a clear and feasible track to reach all EU2020 objectives and that progress can be transparently measured;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the European Council to make tackling youth unemployment a priority and on Member States to develop comprehensive strategies for young people who are not in employment, education or training; calls on Member States to introduce a Youth Guarantee, securing the right of everat as many young persons in the EU to bas possible are offered a job, an apprenticeship, additional training or combined work and training after a maximum period of 4 months' unemployment; encourages Member States to promote entrepreneurship among young persons and develop schemes supporting young entrepreneurs; stresses the importance of reducing precarious employment among young people;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls on the European Council to address the issue of the "skills gap" by adopting the education and training systems to the needs of the labour market and facilitating the transition of graduates from school to workplace;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Member States to support longer working live and create working conditions that enable older workers who so choose to participate and remain in the labour market, by combating age discrimination, replacing incentives for older workers to leave the labour market with incentives for an inclusive labour market and adapting working conditions to the needs of older workers, such as putting in place the right to flexible working time and place of work, the right to training and the right to a flexible exit into retirement;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Calls on Member States to take steps and remove all the existing legal and administrative barriers that hamper the free movement of workers within the European Union;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Member States to invest in education, training, lifelong learning and informal and non-formal learning,not only through formal learning, but also through development of non-formal and informal learning, which lead to higher growth potential and warns of the long- term social and economic costs of cuts in education budgets;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2011/2320(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Encourages vigorous implementation of the National Qualifications Framework as tools promoting development of lifelong learning;
2011/12/21
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2011/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Invites the Government to further encourage the return of refugees and improvement of their living and working conditions by seeking effective and sustainable ways of implementing housing, employment and social measures and any other social and economic recovery projects in a manner coherent with other social and employment programmes;
2011/10/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 84 #

2011/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Croatian authorities to pursue further efforts to reform Croatia’s social system in order to improve its cost- effectiveness and secure sustainability of public finances;
2011/10/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 88 #

2011/2191(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 e (new)
11e. Recognises the right of Member States to introduce transitional provisions concerning the access of Croatian workers to their labour markets but calls on Member States to base such decisions and any extension of transitional periods on facts and only in the situation of a real threat of serious disturbances of national labour markets; at the same time, encourages Member States to consider refraining from introducing transitional periods in order to secure greater freedom of movement of Croatian workers or even free labour market access;
2011/10/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 279 #

2011/2071(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Proposes the setting-up of a sub- committee on the Economic and Monetary Union within its ECON committee where only euro area members would vodelete;d
2011/10/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 4 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the free movement of persons and of workers is one of the key benefits of European integration and an important factor of the European economy;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Supports the idea of an European professional card which would enable a fast-track recognition process of professional qualifications and therefore improve mobility on the labour market; at the same time, looks forward to receiving conclusions from the Steering Group on the professional card that was set up to analyse in detail the implementation of such a card;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. CBelieves that systematic language testing should not act as a burden for foreign professionals to access labour markets therefore calls for a pragmatic approach to language tests, where registration is possible without proof of language but are permitted upon an offer of employment; at the same time, believes that further consideration should be given to language rules applicable to health professionals who have direct contact with patients;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Supports initiatives that aim at adopting training systems to current labour market requirements, scientific and technical progress, clarifying and unifying minimum education and training requirements as well as improving the system of notification and insertion of new specialities into the Directive;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Believes that it is crucial to better prepare graduates to respond to requirements of labour markets, therefore supports the idea of extending the benefits of the Directive to graduates who wish to complete a period of remunerated supervised practical experience in the profession abroad;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2011/2024(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for general simplification and improvement of effectiveness of the administrative processes involved and for a reduction of the costs at all levels including those incurred by professionals;
2011/08/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 3 #

2011/0440(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) "usual residence" shall means the same as in Article 2(d) first paragraph of Regulation (EC) No 763/2008. place where a person normally spends the daily period of rest, regardless of temporary absences for purposes of recreation, holidays, visits to friends and relatives, business, medical treatment or religious pilgrimage.The following persons alone shall be considered to be usual residents of the geographical area in question:
2012/11/08
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 4 #

2011/0440(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – paragraph 2
Where the circumstances described in point (i) or (ii) cannot be established, "usual residence" shall mean the place of legal or registered residence. In applying the definition of ‘usual residence’, Member States shall treat special cases as in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1201/2009.
2012/11/08
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 8 #

2011/0440(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
For the purposes of qualified majority voting in the Council, Member States shall provide the Commission (Eurostat) with data on the total population at national level at the reference time, as referred to in Article 2, within 8 months from the end of the reference year. For the purposes of this Article, Member States shall not provide data on population at their place of legal or registered residence at the reference time.
2012/11/08
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 33 #

2011/0440(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) ‘usual residence’ shall means the same as in Article 2(d) first paragraph of Regulation (EC) No 763/2008place where a person normally spends the daily period of rest, regardless of temporary absences for purposes of recreation, holidays, visits to friends and relatives, business, medical treatment or religious pilgrimage. The following persons alone shall be considered to be usual residents of the geographical area in question:
2012/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2011/0440(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – subparagraph 2
Where the circumstances described in point (i) or (ii) cannot be established, "usual residence" shall mean the place of legal or registered residence; In applying the definition of ‘usual residence’, Member States shall treat special cases as in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1201/2009.
2012/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2011/0440(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
For the purposes of qualified majority voting in the Council, Member States shall provide the Commission (Eurostat) with data on the total population at national level at the reference time, as referred to in Article 2, within 8 months from the end of the reference year. For the purposes of this Article, Member States shall not provide data on population at their place of legal or registered residence at the reference time.
2012/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 30 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Directive 2005/36/EC should also cover notaries. For recognition requests for establishment, Member States should be able to impose the necessary aptitude test or adaptation period to avoid any discrimination in the national selection and nomination procedures. In the case of free provision of services, notaries should not be able to draw up authentic instruments and carry out other activities of authentication which require the seal of the host Member State.deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 4
(b) The following paragraph 4 is added: "4. In the case of notaries, the authentic instruments and other activities of authentication which require the seal of the host Member State shall be excluded from the provision of services."deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 128 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point c
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 14 – paragraph 3
c) In paragraph 3, the following subparagraph is inserted after the first subparagraph: "For the profession of notary, the host Member State may, when it determines the compensation measure, take into account the specific activities of this profession on its territory, in particular as regards the law to be applied."deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point a a (new)
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 33 – paragraph 2
(aa) Paragraph 2 is deleted.
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 144 #

2011/0435(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32
Directive 2005/36/EC
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) at least four years of full-time study at a university or comparable teaching institution leading to successful completion of a university-level examination and at least two years of remunerated traineeship;
2012/07/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2011/0386(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Treaty requires that Member States' regard their economic policies as a matter of common concern and that their budgetary policies are guided by the need for sound public finances and that their economic policies do not risk jeopardising the proper functioning of Eeconomic and Mmonetary Unionunion and of the Union as a whole.
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 96 #

2011/0386(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) As demonstrated by the sovereign debt crisis, and in particular by the need to put in place common financial backstops, Member States whose currency is the euro share enhanced spill-overs from their budgetary policy. Each of the Member States whose currency is the euro should consult the Commission and other Member States whose currency is the euro before the adoption of any major fiscal policy reform plans with potential spill-over effects, so as to give the possibility for an assessment of possible impact for the euro area as a wholeall Member States. They should consider their budgetary plans to be of common concern and submit them to the Commission for monitoring purposes in advance of the plans becoming binding. The Commission should be in a position, if necessary, to adopt an opinion on the draft budgetary plan, that the Member State and in particular budgetary authorities should be invited to take into account in the process of the budget law adoption. Such an opinion should ensure that Union's policy guidance in the budgetary area is appropriately integrated in the national budgetary preparations. In particular, this opinion should include an assessment of whether or not the budgetary plans appropriately address the recommendations issued in the context of the European semester in the budgetary area. The Commission should stand ready to present this opinion to the Parliament of the Member State concerned at its request. The extent to which this opinion has been taken into account should be part of the assessment, if and when the conditions are met, leading to the decision to place the concerned Member State in excessive deficit procedure, where no follow-up to the early guidance from the Commission should be considered as an aggravating factor. Also, based on an overall assessment of the plans by the Commission, the Eurogroup should discuss the budgetary situation and prospects for the euro area.
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 139 #

2011/0386(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. Draft budget laws for the gcenetral government shall be made public annually no later than 15 October together with the independent macroeconomic forecasts on which they are based.
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 142 #

2011/0386(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Budget laws for the gcenetral government shall be adopted and made public annually no later than 31 December.
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 174 #

2011/0386(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the targeted budget balance for the gcenetral government as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), broken down by sub-sector of gcenetral government;
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 176 #

2011/0386(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the projections at unchanged policies for expenditure and revenue as a percentage of GDP for the gcenetral government and their main components.;
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 178 #

2011/0386(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the targeted expenditure and revenue as a percentage of GDP for the gcenetral government and their main components, taking into account the conditions and criteria to establish the growth path of government expenditure net of discretionary revenue measures under Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1466/97;
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 230 #

2011/0386(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. The EurogroupMember States shall discuss opinions of the Commission on the national budgetary plans and the budgetary situation and prospects in the euro area as a whole on the basis of the overall assessment made by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 3. The assessment shall be made public.
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #

2011/0385(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The full consistency between the Union multilateral surveillance framework established by the Treaty and the possible policy conditions attached to this financial assistance should be enshrined in Union law. The economic and financial integration of theall Member States, in particular those whose currency is the euro, calls for a reinforced surveillance to prevent a contagion from a Member State experiencing difficulties with respect to its financial stability to the rest of the euro area.
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 61 #

2011/0385(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) A Member State whose currency is the euro should be subject to enhanced surveillance when it is experiencing - or at risk of experiencing - severe financial disturbance, with a view to ensuring its swift return to a normal situation and to protecting the other euro area Member States against possible negative spill over effects. This enhanced surveillance should include a wider access to the information needed for a close monitoring of the economic, fiscal and financial situation and a regular reporting to the Economic and Financial Committee (EFC) or to any sub- committee the latter may designate for that purpose. The same modalities of surveillance should apply to Member States requesting precautionary assistance from the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or another international financial institution.
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 78 #

2011/0385(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) A decision regarding the non- compliance of a Member State with its adjustment programme would also entail a suspension of payments or commitments of Union funds as provided by Article 21(6) of Regulation (EU) No XXX laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the common strategic framework and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006,deleted
2012/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 41 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facilityrespecting national allocations for the projects listed in the Annex of this Regulation. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to give greatest possible priority to the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 80 #

2011/0302(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) transport: EUR 31 694 000 000, out of which EUR 10 000 000 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fundfor projects listed in the Annex to this Regulation, respecting the national allocations;
2012/09/20
Committee: REGI
Amendment 141 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10
(10) ‘State aid’ means aid falling under Article 107(1) of the Treaty which shall be deemed for the purposes of this Regulation also to include de minimis aid within the meaning of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to de minimis aid, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1535/2007 of 20 December 2007 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid in the sector of agricultural production and Commission Regulation (EC) No 875/2007 of 24 July 2007 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid in the fisheries sector and amending Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004; , Commission Regulation (EC) No 360/2012 of 25 April 2012 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid granted to undertakings providing services of general economic interest1, as well as aid in the form of public services granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest within the meaning of the Commission Decision of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest2. 1 OJ L 114, 26.4.2012, p. 8. 2 OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 185 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) promoting active social inclusion and combating poverty;
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 254 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 21
[...]deleted
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 347 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 55 – paragraph 6
6. Net revenue directly generated by an operation during its implementation which has not been taken into account at the time of approval of the operation, shall be deducted from the eligible expenditure of the operation in the final payment claim submitted by the beneficiary. This rule shall not apply to financial instrumentsprojects whose value is less than 5000 EUR, to financial instruments, operations subject to the rules on State Aid, operations for which public support takes the form of lump sums or standard scale unit costs, operations implemented under a joint action plan and prizes.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 350 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 59 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) value added tax. However, VAT amounts shall be eligible where they are not recoverable under national VAT legislation and are paid by a beneficiary other than non-taxable person as defined in the first subparagraph of Article 13(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC, provided that such VAT amounts are not incurred in relation to the provision of infrastructure which is recoverable under national VAT legislation.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 373 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 3
3. At least 250 % of the Structural Funds resources for less developed regions and for regions whose GDP per capita for the 2007-2013 period was less than 75% of the average GDP of the EU-25 but which are now eligible under the transition or more developed regions category, 40% for transition regions and 52% for more developed regions in each Member State shall be allocated to the ESF. For the purposes of this provision, the support to a Member State through the [Food for deprived people instrument] shall be considered as part of the share of Structural Funds allocated to the ESF.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 374 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 4
4. The support from the Cohesion Fund for transport infrastructure under the Connecting Europe Facility shall be EUR 10 000 000 000. The Commission shall adopt a decision by implementing act setting out the amount to be transferred from each Member State's Cohesion Fund allocation for the whole period. The Cohesion Fund allocation of each Member State shall be reduced accordingly. The annual appropriations corresponding to the support from the Cohesion Fund mentioned in the first subparagraph shall be entered in the relevant budget lines of the Connecting Europe Facility as from the 2014 budgetary exercise. Support from the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facility shall be implemented in accordance with Article [13] of Regulation (EU) […]/2012 on establishing the Connecting Europe Facility35 in respect of projects listed in Annex 1 to that Regulation, giving greatest possible priority to projects respecting the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.deleted
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 384 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 85 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the Commission may accept, in duly justified circumstances which are linked to the implementation of one or more thematic objectives, a proposal by a Member State in its first submission of the Partnership Contract to transfer up to 25% of the total appropriation for a category of regions to other categories of regions.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 389 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 1
1. An operational programme shall consist of priority axes. A priority axis shall concern one Fund for a category of region and shall correspond, without prejudice to Article 52, to a thematic objective and comprise one or more investment priorities of that thematic objective, in accordance with the Fund- specific rules. For the ESF, a priority axis may combine investment priorities from different thematic objectives set out in Article 9(8), (9), (10) and (11) in order to facilitate their contribution to other priority axes, in duly justified circumstancesIn duly justified circumstances, a priority axis may concern more categories of regions or combine one or more complementary investment priorities from different thematic objectives and Funds, where necessary to increase effectiveness and to better meet targets of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 423 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 88 – paragraph 2
2. The ERDF and the ESF may finance, in a complementary manner and subject to a limit of 510 % of Union funding for each priority axis of an operational programme, a part of an operation for which the costs are eligible for support from the other Fund on the basis of eligibility rules applied to that Fund, provided that they are necessary for the satisfactory implementation of the operation and are directly linked to it.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 464 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) 785% for the less developed regions of Member States other than those referred to in points (b) and (c), and for all regions whose GDP per capita for the 2007-2013 period was less than 75% of the average of the EU-25 for the reference period but whose GDP per capita is above 75% of the GDP average of the EU-27;
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 465 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 110 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The co-financing rate at the level of each priority axis of operational programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal shall be no higher than 785%.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 479 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 127 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall decommit any part of the amount calculated in accordance with the second subparagraph in an operational programme that has not been used for payment of the initial and annual pre-financing, interim payments and annual balance by 31 December of the seconthird financial year following the year of budget commitment under the operational programme or for which a payment application drawn up in accordance with Article 121 has not been submitted in accordance with Article 126.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 487 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 137 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. In case of an agreement, the Member State may reuse the Union funds concerned in conformity with the Article 135 (3).
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 488 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 137 – paragraph 5
5. In absence of an agreement and in order to apply financial corrections the Commission shall take a decision, by means of implementing acts, within six months of the date of the hearing, or of the date of receipt of additional information where the Member State agrees to submit such additional information following the hearing. The Commission shall take account of all information and observations submitted during the course of the procedure. If no hearing takes place, the six month period shall begin to run two months after the date of the letter of invitation to the hearing sent by the Commission.
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 489 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 137 – paragraph 6
6. Where irregularities affecting annual accounts sent to the Commission are detected by the Commission or by the European Court of Auditors, the resulting financial correction shall reduce support from the Funds to the operational programme.deleted
2012/05/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The ESF should improve employment opportunities, support the creation of sustainable and quality jobs, promote education and life- long learning and develop active inclusion policies in accordance with the tasks entrusted to the ESF by Article 162 of the Treaty, and thereby contribute to economic, social and territorial cohesion in accordance with Article 174 of the Treaty. In accordance with Article 9 of the Treaty, the ESF should take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The European Union is confronted with structural and demographic challenges arising from economic globalisation, technological change and an increasingly ageing workforce and growing skills and labour shortages in some sectors and regions. They have been compounded by the recent economic and financial crisis, which has resulted in increased levels of unemployment, hitting in particular young people and other vulnerable groups, such as migrants. The ESF should aim to promote and create employment and support labour mobility, invest in education, skills and life-long learning, promote social inclusion and combat poverty. In promoting the better functioning of labour markets by enhancing the transnational geographical mobility of workers, the ESF should, in particular,may support European Employment Services (EURES activities) in relation to recruitment and the related information, advice and guidance services at national and cross-border level. The European Commission should systematically monitor EURES activities and publish the results.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 79 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) At the same time, it is crucial to support the development and, competitiveness and pan- European mobility of European small and medium-sized enterprises and to ensure that people can adapt, through acquiring appropriate skills and through lifelong learning opportunities, to changing economic and social conditions as well as new challenges such as the shift to a knowledge-based economy, the digital agenda, and the transition to a low-carbon and more energy-efficient economy. By pursuing its primary thematic objectives, the ESF should contribute to addressing these challenges. In this context, the ESF should support the labour force transition towards greener skills and jobs, in particular in the energy efficiency, renewable energy and sustainable transport sectors, taking into account the Union's intention to increase the proportion of the EU budget that is related to climate mainstreaming to at least 20%, with contributions from different policy fields.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The ESF should contribute to the Europe 2020 Strategy, ensuring greater concentration of support on the priorities of the European Union. The ESF should in particular increase its support for the active fight against social exclusion and poverty, through a minimum ring-fenced allocation. According to the level of development of the supported regions, the choice and number of investment priorities for ESF support should also be limited.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Taking into consideration the fact that in order to assure employment and social cohesion an integrated and holistic approach is needed, the ESF should support cross-sectoral and transnational cooperation and territorial- based partnerships.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The Member States and regions should be encouraged to leverage the ESF through financial instruments in order to support for example studentemployability, especially among young persons, job creation, and mobility of workers, social inclusion and social entrepreneurship.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) Taking into account that social innovation is a subject of different programmes, measures should be put in place to avoid overlapping or double- financing of the same activities and initiatives. In addition, since some activities carried out under ESF under shared management partially overlap with those of the Programme for Social Change and Innovation, which is under direct management, measures should be put in place not to duplicate or double- finance activities falling under different management modes.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The ESF shall benefit people, including disadvantaged groups such as the long- term unemployed, youth and low-skilled workers, people with disabilities, migrants, ethnic minorities, marginalised communities and people facing social exclusion. The ESF shall also provide support to enterprises, systems and structures with a view to facilitating their adaptation to new challenges and promoting good governance and the implementation of reforms, in particular in the fields of employment, education and social policies.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) Access to employment and employment services for job-seekers and inactive people, including local employment initiatives and support for labour mobility;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv
(iv) Equality between men and women and rReconciliation between work and private life and equality between men and women;
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point vii a (new)
(viia) Support the employment of persons in a disadvantaged situation on the labour market, in particular persons with disabilities.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 292 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the strategy and actions set out in the Operational Programmes are consistent and focused on addressing the challenges identified in the National Reform Programmes and the relevant Council Recommendations made under Article 148(4) of the Treaty, in order to contribute to achieving the headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy on employment, education and poverty reduction and fulfilling the mission of the fund as outlined in article 2.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. At least 20 % of the total ESF resources in each Member State shall be allocated to the thematic objective "actively promoting social inclusion and combating poverty" set out in Article 9(9) of Regulation (EU) No […]. By way of derogation, in duly justified cases, the investment priorities referred to in Article 5(9)(a) to (c) of Regulation (EU) No [...] [ERDF] shall be included in that 20% of total ESF resources.
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) For less developed regions and for the regions whose GDP per capita for the 2007- 2013 period was less than 75% of the average GDP of the EU- 25 but which are now eligible under the transition or more developed regions categories, Member States shall concentrate 60 % of the ESF allocation to each operational programme on up to fourive of the investment priorities set out in Article 3(1).
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 380 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. By way of derogation from Article 87(1) of Regulation (EU) No […], operational programmes may set out priority axes for the implementation of social innovation and transnational cooperation as referred to in Articles 9 and 10. By way of derogation from Article 4(2) and (3), priority axes wholly dedicated, under operational programmes, to social innovation or to transnational cooperation, or to a combination of both, shall not be included in the total ESF resources in each Member State, as referred to in Article 4(2), or in the allocation for each operational programme, as referred to in Article 4(3).
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 388 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The ESF mayshall, in particular support community-led local development strategies, as referred to in Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No [...], territorial pacts and local initiatives for employment, education and social inclusion, as well as Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) as referred to in Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No [...].
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 406 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. ESF may be used to enhance access to capital markets for public and private bodies at national and regional levels implementing actions and policies falling within the scope of the ESF and the operational programme through ‘ESF policy-based guarantees’ subject to Commission approval. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16 to define the specific rules and conditions for the applications of Member States, including ceilings, for policy-based guarantees, ensuring in particular that their use does not lead to excessive levels of debt of public bodies. Each application shall be assessed by the Commission and the Commission shall approve each ‘ESF policy-based guarantee’ provided it falls within the remit of the Operational Programme referred to in Article 87 of Regulation (EU) No […] and provided it is in accordance with the established specific rules and conditions.deleted
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 457 #

2011/0268(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – point 4 – point 3 – point i (new)
(i) participants who became independent from benefits
2012/06/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2011/0217(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 13
(13) In particular, Union citizens considering whether to make use of their right to free movement should be informed about their rights to acquire or preserve social security rights by virtue of the Union rules on coordination of social security systems; these rules ensure that they will not lose out on their social security rights when choosing to move within Europe. They should further be informed about their right to obtain recognition of their professional qualifications and about the social and civic competences which form part of the European framework of ‘Key Competences for lifelong learning’ and which can equip them to fully participate in civic life and empower them to exercise their rights under Union law. Citizens should also be informed about the new possibilities for the recognition of qualifications they have acquired, via reference to national and European qualifications frameworks. This fosters personal development and enhances citizens’ prospects and opportunities for mobility, both in education and on the labour market.
2011/12/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Taxation related to CO2 emissions can be a cost-effective means for Member States to achieve the reductions of greenhouse gasses necessary according to Decision 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Union's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020 as regards sources not covered by the Union scheme under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. In view of the potential role of CO2-related taxation, the proper functioning of the internal market requires common rules on that taxation.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 29 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) It should be borne in mind, however, that the Member States’ economies vary where the energy mix is concerned, and that the process of cutting greenhouse gas emissions ought to be supported in line with the principle of fiscal neutrality, ensuring that it does not adversely affect the competitiveness of the economies concerned. This Directive takes account of the fact that many Member States are currently developing long-term, optimum energy mix strategies enabling them, for example, to move towards low-emissions economies, which, in turn, will allow them to meet the climate challenges set by EU law. Given the legitimate social and economic interests involved, the Member States ought to be given a free hand when it comes to applying taxation relating to CO2 emissions. Giving the Member States such discretion means that they have freedom of choice/optionality with regard to the use of an emissions component in setting the tax rate for energy products and electricity.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 30 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Member States should, however, also be able, as hitherto, to use energy taxation on heating fuels, motor fuels and electricity for a variety of purposes not necessarily nor specifically or exclusively related to the reduction of greenhouse gases.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 33 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Therefore, provision should be made for energy taxation to consist of one or two components, CO2-related taxation and i.e. compulsory general energy consumption taxation. In order for energy taxation to adapt to the operation of the Union scheme under Directive 2003/87/EC Member States should be required to explicitly distinguish between those two components. This would also allow distinct treatment of fuels that are biomass or made from biomass and, as optional, CO2-related taxation.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 39 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Each of those components should be calculated on the basis of objective criteria, allowing for equal treatment of different energy sources. For the purposes of optional CO2- related taxation, reference should be made to CO2-emissions caused by the use of each energy product concerned, using the reference CO2 emission factors set out in Commission Decision 2007/589/EC of 18 July 2007 establishing guidelines for the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. For the purposes of general energy consumption taxation, reference should be made to the energy content of the various energy products and of electricity as referred to in Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC. In this context, account should be taken of the environmental advantages of biomass or products made of biomass. These products should be taxed on the basis of the CO2 emission factors specified in Decision 2007/589/EC for biomass or products made of biomass and of their energy content as specified in Annex III to Directive 2009/28/EC. Biofuels and bioliquids defined in Article 2(h) and (i) of Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources are by far the most important category concerned. Since the environmental advantages of these products vary, depending on whether they comply with the sustainability criteria laid down in Article 17 of that Directive, the specific reference values for biomass and products made of biomass should only apply where these criteria are met.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) CO2-related taxation should be adapted to the operation of Directive 2003/87/EC so as to complement it effectively. That optional taxation should apply to all uses, including those for purposes other than heating, of energy products causing CO2 emissions in installations within the meaning of that Directive, provided that the installation concerned is not subject to the emission trading scheme under that Directive. However, since the cumulative application of both instruments would not allow emission reductions beyond those attained, overall, through the emission trading scheme alone, but would merely increase the total cost of these reductions, CO2 related taxation should not apply to consumption in installations subject to the Union scheme.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 43 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In the interest of fiscal neutrality, the same minimum levels of taxation should apply for each component of energy taxation, to all energy products put to a given use. Where equal minimum levels of taxation are thus prescribed, Member States should, also for reason of fiscal neutrality, ensure equal levels of national taxation on all products concerned. Where needed, transitional periods for the purposes of equalising those levels should be foreseen.deleted
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 48 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The minimum levels of CO2-related taxation should be fixed in the light of the national targets for Member States as laid down in Decision 406/2009/EC on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Union's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020. Since that Decision recognises that efforts to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions should be fairly distributed between the Member States, transitional periods should be fixed for certain Member States.deleted
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 52 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) It should be ensured that the minimum levels of taxation preserve their intended effects. Since CO2-related taxation complements the operation of Directive 2003/87/EC, the market price of the emission allowances should be closely monitored in the periodic review of the Directive, incumbent on the Commission. The minimum levels of general energy consumption taxation should at regular intervals be automatically aligned to take into account the evolution of their real value in order to preserve the current level of rate harmonisation; to reduce the volatility stemming from energy and food prices, this alignment should be made on the basis of the changes in the Union- wide harmonised index of consumer prices excluding energy and unprocessed food as published by Eurostat.deleted
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 70 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) There is a need to limit the potential cost impact of optional CO2-related taxation on the sectors or sub-sectors deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage in the meaning of Article 10a(13) of Directive 2003/87/EC. Accordingly, it is appropriate to provide for corresponding transitional measures which, however, should also preserve the environmental effectiveness of CO2- related taxation.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 72 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Article 5 of Directive 2003/96/EC permits the application of differentiated rates of taxation in certain cases. However, in order to ensure the consistency of the CO2 price signal, the possibility for Member States to differentiate national rates should be restricted to general energy consumption taxation. Moreover, the possibility to apply a lower level of taxation to motor fuel used by taxis is no longer compatible with the objective of policies promoting alternative fuels and energy carriers and the use of cleaner vehicles in urban transport and should thus be removed.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 80 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) In the case of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and natural gas used as propellants, advantages in the form of lower minimum levels of general energy consumption taxation or the possibility to exempt those energy products from taxation are no longer justified, in particular in the light of the need to increase the market share of renewable energy sources and should therefore be removed in the medium term.deleted
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 90 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Article 15(3) of Directive 2003/96/EC allows Member States to apply to agricultural, horticultural and piscicultural works as well as to forestry not only the provisions generally applicable to business uses but also a level of taxation down to zero. An examination of that option has revealed that as far as general energy consumption taxation is concerned its maintenance would be contrary to the Union's wider policy objectives unless it is linked to a counterpart ensuring advances in the field of energy efficiency. As regards optional CO2 related taxation the treatment of the sectors concerned should be aligned to the rules applying to industrial sectors.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 94 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) In the absence of a more far-reaching harmonisation in the area of heating fuels used for business purposes, Member States with levels of taxation above the minimum levels prescribed in that area should continue to be able to provide for certain reductions. The applicable conditions should distinguish between general energy consumption taxation and CO2- related taxation, since those two elements pursue different objectives. Furthermore, it should be made clear that references to tradable permit schemes in Article 17 of Directive 2003/96/EC do not include the Union scheme under Directive 2003/87/EC.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 102 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) Every five years and for the first time by the end of 2015, the Commission should report to the Council on the application of this Directive, examining in particular the minimum level of optional CO2-related taxation in the light of the evolution of the market price in the EU of the emission allowances, the impact of innovation and technological developments and the justification for the tax exemptions and reductions laid down in this Directive, including for fuel used for the purpose of air and maritime navigation. The list of sectors or sub-sectors deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage shall be the subject of regular review, in particular taking into account the availability of emerging evidence.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 108 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Member States shallmay distinguish between CO2-related taxation and general energy consumptiontwo different components of taxation: compulsory general energy consumption taxation and optional CO2-related taxation.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 112 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
CO2-relatedIn case of introduction of an optional CO2-related component, taxation shall be calculated in EUR/t of CO2 emissions, on the basis of the reference CO2 emission factors set out in point 11 of Annex I to Commission Decision 2007/589/EC of 18 July 2007 establishing guidelines for the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. The CO2 emission factors specified in this Decision for biomass or products made of biomass shall in the case of biofuels and bioliquids defined in Article 2(h) and (i) of Directive 2009/28/EC only apply where the product concerned complies with the sustainability criteria laid down in Article 17 of Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Where biofuels and bioliquids do not comply with those criteria, Member States shall apply the reference CO2 emission factor for the equivalent heating fuel or motor fuel for which minimum levels of taxation are specified in this Directive.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 115 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. Unless otherwise specified, the provisions of this Directive shall apply both to CO2-related taxation and to general energy consumption taxation and to CO2-related taxation, if such taxation component has been introduced by a Member State.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 118 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Optional CO2-related taxation shall, subject to Article 14(1)(d) of this Directive, apply to uses of energy products giving rise to carbon dioxide emissions from installations as defined in Article 3(e) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, whether or not those installations reach the threshold values indicated in Annex I to that Directive.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 122 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4 – point a
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) as regards optional CO2-related taxation, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), at the time of release for consumption;
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 124 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. ‘Without prejudice to the exemptions, differentiations and reductions provided for in this Directive, Member States shall ensure that where equal minimum levels of taxation are laid down in Annex I in relation to a given use, equal levels of taxation are fixed for products put to that use. Without prejudice to Article 15(1)(i), for motor fuels referred to in Annex I Table A, this shall apply as from 1 January 2023. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, each use for which a minimum level of taxation is identified, respectively, in Tables A, B and C in Annex I shall be considered to be a single use.deleted
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 137 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
4. The minimum levels of general energy consumption taxation laid down in this Directive shall be adapted every three years starting from 1 July 2016 in order to take account of the changes in the harmonised index of consumer prices excluding energy and unprocessed food as published by Eurostat. The Commission shall publish the resulting minimum levels of taxation in the Official Journal of the European Union.deleted
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 163 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 11 – point a – point iii
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 14 – paragraph 1– point d
(d) as regards optional CO2-related taxation, energy products used for activities subject to, and not excluded from, the Union scheme within the meaning of Directive 2003/87/EC;
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 171 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 12
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 14a – paragraph 1
1. Until 31 December 2020, Member States shall provide a credit concerning optional CO2- related taxation with respect to the use of energy products by installations belonging to sectors or sub-sectors deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 179 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 13 – point a – point i
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) Until 1 January 2023, natural gas and LPG used as propellants;’deleted
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 197 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 14
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Provided the minimum levels of taxation prescribed in this Directive are respected on average for each business, Member States may apply tax reductions from optional CO2- related taxation to energy products used for heating purposes or for the purposes of Article 8(2)(b) and (c) where agreements are concluded with business entities as referred to in Article 11 or associations of such business entities, or where tradable permit schemes or equivalent measures are implemented, as far as they lead to objectives concerning the reduction of CO2 emissions.
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 198 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 14
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia may, for uses referred to in Articles 8 and 9, apply a transitional period until 1 January 2021 to introduce CO2-related taxation. If the Union decides that the levels of greenhouse gas emissions be reduced by 2020 by more than 20% compared to the levels attained in 1990, the Commission shall examine the application of these transitional periods and, if appropriate, present a proposal with a view to shortening them and/or modifying the minimum levels of CO2-related taxation as set out in Annex I.’deleted
2011/12/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Since differences in rates of taxation do not give rise to the same obstacles, the system (the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)) need not affect the discretion of Member States regarding their national rate(s) of company taxation.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 47 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Consolidation is an essential element of such a system, since the major tax obstacles faced by companies in the Union can be tackled only in that way. It eliminates transfer pricing formalities and intra-group double taxation. Moreover, losses incurred by taxpayers are automatically offset against profits generated by other members of the same group.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Consolidation necessarily entails rules for apportionment of the result between the Member States in which group members are establishdeleted.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 55 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) Since such a system is primarily designed to serve the needs of companies that operate across borders, it should be an optional scheme, accompanying the existing national corporate tax systems. However, when reviewing this Directive, special consideration should be given to introduction of an obligatory system of Common Corporate Tax Base.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) The system (the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)) should consist in a set of common rules for computing the tax base of companies without prejudice to the rules laid down in Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council 1606/2002/EC.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 71 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Eligibility for consolidation (group membership) should be determined in accordance with a two-part test based on (i) control (more than 50% of voting rights) and (ii) ownership (more than 75% of equity) or rights to profits (more than 75% of rights giving entitlement to profit). Such a test ensures a high level of economic integration between group members, as indicated by a relation of control and a high level of participation. The two thresholds should be met throughout the tax year; otherwise, the company should leave the group immediately. There should also be a nine- month minimum requirement for group membership.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) Rules on business reorganisations should be established in order to protect the taxing rights of Member States in an equitable manner. Where a company enters the group, pre-consolidation trading losses should be carried forward to be set off against the taxpayer's apportioned share. When a company leaves the group, no losses incurred during the period of consolidation should be allocated to it. An adjustment may be made in respect of capital gains where certain assets are disposed within a short period after entry to or exit from a group. The value of self-generated intangible assets should be assessed on the basis of a suitable proxy, that is to say research and development, marketing and advertising costs over a specified period.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 78 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) The formula for apportioning the consolidated tax base should comprise three equally weighted factors (labour, assets and sales). The labour factor should be computed on the basis of payroll and the number of employees (each item counting for half). The asset factor should consist of all fixed tangible assets. Intangibles and financial assets should be excluded from the formula due to their mobile nature and the risks of circumventing the system. The use of these factors gives appropriate weight to the interests of the Member State of origin. Finally, sales should be taken into account in order to ensure fair participation of the Member State of destination. Those factors and weightings should ensure that profits are taxed where they are earned. As an exception to the general principle, where the outcome of the apportionment does not fairly represent the extent of business activity, a safeguard clause provides for an alternative method.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive shall apply to companies established under the laws of a third country where both of the following conditions are met: (a) the company has a similar form to one of the forms listed in Annex I; (b) the company is subject to one of the corporate taxes listed in Annex II.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 103 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3
Eligible third country company forms 1. The Commission shall adopt annually a list of third country company forms which shall be considered to meet the requirements laid down in Article 2(2)(a). That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 131(2). 2. The fact that a company form is not included in the list of third country company forms referred to in paragraph 1 shall not preclude the application of this Directive to that form.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 110 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘single taxpayer’ means a taxpayer not fulfilling the requirements for consolidation;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 115 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘principal taxpayer’ means: (a) a resident taxpayer, where it forms a group with its qualifying subsidiaries, its permanent establishments located in other Member States or one or more permanent establishments of a qualifying subsidiary resident in a third country; or (b) the resident taxpayer designated by the group where it is composed only of two or more resident taxpayers which are immediate qualifying subsidiaries of the same parent company resident in a third country; or (c) a resident taxpayer which is the qualifying subsidiary of a parent company resident in a third country, where that resident taxpayer forms a group solely with one or more permanent establishments of its parent; or (d) the permanent establishment designated by a non-resident taxpayer which forms a group solely in respect of its permanent establishments located in two or more Member States.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘group member’ means any taxpayer belonging to the same group, as defined in Articles 54 and 55. Where a taxpayer maintains one or more permanent establishments in a Member State other than that in which its central management and control is located, each permanent establishment shall be treated as a group member;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 117 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) ‘consolidated tax base’ means the result of adding up the tax bases of all group members as calculated in accordance with Article 10;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 118 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘apportioned share’ means the portion of the consolidated tax base of a group which is allocated to a group member by application of the formula set out in Articles 86-102;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 120 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 21
(21) ‘competent authority’ means the authority designated by each Member State to administer all matters related to the implementation of this Directive;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 122 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 22
(22) ‘principal tax authority’ means the competent authority of the Member State in which the principal taxpayer is resident or, if it is a permanent establishment of a non-resident taxpayer, is situated;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 123 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 23
(23) ‘audit’ means inquiries, inspections or examinations of any kind conducted by a competent authority for the purpose of verifying the compliance of a taxpayer with this Directive.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 208 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 54
Qualifying subsidiaries 1. Qualifying subsidiaries shall be all immediate and lower-tier subsidiaries in which the parent company holds the following rights: (a) a right to exercise more than 50% of the voting rights; (b) an ownership right amounting to more than 75% of the company's capital or more than 75% of the rights giving entitlement to profit. 2. For the purpose of calculating the thresholds referred to in paragraph 1 in relation to companies other than immediate subsidiaries, the following rules shall be applied: (a) once the voting-right threshold is reached in respect of immediate and lower-tier subsidiaries, the parent company shall be deemed to hold 100% of such rights. (b) entitlement to profit and ownership of capital shall be calculated by multiplying the interests held in intermediate subsidiaries at each tier. Ownership rights amounting to 75% or less held directly or indirectly by the parent company, including rights in companies resident in a third country, shall also be taken into account in the calculation.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 209 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 54 – paragraph 1
1. Qualifying subsidiaries shall be all immediate and lower-tier subsidiaries in which the parent company holds the following rights: (a) a right to exercise more than 50% of the voting rights; (b) an ownership right amounting to more than 75% of the company's capital or more than 75% of the rights giving entitlement to profit.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 215 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 54 – paragraph 2
2. For the purpose of calculating the thresholds referred to in paragraph 1 in relation to companies other than immediate subsidiaries, the following rules shall be applied: (a) once the voting-right threshold is reached in respect of immediate and lower-tier subsidiaries, the parent company shall be deemed to hold 100% of such rights. (b) entitlement to profit and ownership of capital shall be calculated by multiplying the interests held in intermediate subsidiaries at each tier. Ownership rights amounting to 75% or less held directly or indirectly by the parent company, including rights in companies resident in a third country, shall also be taken into account in the calculation.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 218 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 55
Formation of group 1. A resident taxpayer shall form a group with: (a) all its permanent establishments located in other Member States; (b) all permanent establishments located in a Member State of its qualifying subsidiaries resident in a third country; (c) all its qualifying subsidiaries resident in one or more Member States; (d) other resident taxpayers which are qualifying subsidiaries of the same company which is resident in a third country and fulfils the conditions in Article 2(2)(a). 2. A non-resident taxpayer shall form a group in respect of all its permanent establishments located in Member States and all its qualifying subsidiaries resident in one or more Member States, including the permanent establishments of the latter located in Member States.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 219 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 56
Insolvency A company in insolvency or liquidation may not become a member of a group. A taxpayer in respect of which a declaration of insolvency is made or which is liquidated shall leave the group immediately.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 220 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 57
Scope of consolidation 1. The tax bases of the members of a group shall be consolidated. 2. When the consolidated tax base is negative, the loss shall be carried forward and be set off against the next positive consolidated tax base. When the consolidated tax base is positive, it shall be shared in accordance with Articles 86 to 102.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 226 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 58
Timing 1. The thresholds of Article 54 must be met throughout the tax year. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, a taxpayer shall become a member of a group on the date when the thresholds of Article 54 are reached. The thresholds must be met for at least nine consecutive months, failing which a taxpayer shall be treated as if it had never having become a member of the group.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 229 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 59
Elimination of intra-group transactions 1. In calculating the consolidated tax base, profits and losses arising from transactions directly carried out between members of a group shall be ignored. 2. For the purpose of determining whether there is an intra-group transaction, both parties to the transaction must be group members at the time that the transaction is effected and the associated revenues and expenses fall to be recognised. 3. Groups shall apply a consistent and adequately documented method for recording intra-group transactions. Groups may change the method only for valid commercial reasons, at the beginning of a tax year. 4. The method for recording intra-group transactions shall enable all intra-group transfers and sales to be identified at the lower of cost and value for tax purposes.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 232 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 60
Withholding and source taxation No withholding taxes or other source taxation shall be charged on transactions between members of a group.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 233 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 61
Fixed assets on entering the group Where a taxpayer is the economic owner of non-depreciable or individually depreciable fixed assets on the date of its entry into a group and any of these assets are disposed of by a member of a group within five years of that date, an adjustment shall be made in the year of the disposal to the apportioned share of the group member that held the economic ownership over these assets on the date of entry. The proceeds of such disposal shall be added to that share and the costs relating to non-depreciable assets and the value for tax purposes of depreciable assets shall be deducted. Such an adjustment shall also be made in respect of financial assets with the exception of shares in affiliated undertakings, participating interests and own shares. If, as a result of a business reorganisation, the taxpayer no longer exists or no longer has a permanent establishment in the Member State in which it was resident on the date of its entry into the group, it shall be deemed to have a permanent establishment there for the purpose of applying the provisions of this Article.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 234 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 62
Long-term contracts on entering the group Revenues and expenses which accrued according to Articles 24(2) and (3) before a taxpayer entered the group but had not yet been included in the calculation of tax under the applicable national corporate tax law shall be added to, or deducted from the apportioned share in accordance with the timing rules of national law. Revenues which were taxed under the applicable national corporate tax law before a taxpayer entered the group in an amount higher than that which would have been charged under Article 24(2) shall be deducted from the apportioned share.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 235 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 63
Provisions and Deductions on entering the group Expenses covered by Articles 25, 26 and 27, which are incurred in relation to activities or transactions carried out before a taxpayer entered the group but for which no provision or deduction had been made under the applicable national corporate tax law shall be deductible only against the apportioned share of the taxpayer, unless they are incurred more than five years after the taxpayer enters the group.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 236 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 64
Losses on entering the group Unrelieved losses incurred by a taxpayer or a permanent establishment under the rules of this Directive or under national corporate tax law before entering a group may not be set off against the consolidated tax base. Such losses shall be carried forward and may be set off against the apportioned share in accordance respectively with Article 43 or with the national corporate tax law which would be applicable to the taxpayer in the absence of the system provided for by this Directive.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 237 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 65
Termination of a group When a group terminates, the tax year shall be deemed to end. The consolidated tax base and any unrelieved losses of the group shall be allocated to each group member in accordance with Articles 86 to 102, on the basis of the apportionment factors applicable to the tax year of termination.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 238 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 66
Losses after the group terminates Following termination of the group, losses shall be treated as follows: (a) if the taxpayer remains in the system provided for by this Directive but outside a group, the losses shall be carried forward and be set off according to Article 43; (b) if the taxpayer joins another group, the losses shall be carried forward and be set off against its apportioned share; (c) if the taxpayer leaves the system, the losses shall be carried forward and be set off according to the national corporate tax law which becomes applicable, as if those losses had arisen while the taxpayer was subject to that law.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 243 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 67
Fixed assets on leaving the group If non-depreciable or individually depreciable fixed assets, except for those which gave rise to a reduced exemption under Article 75, are disposed of within three years of the departure from the group of the taxpayer holding the economic ownership over these assets, the proceeds shall be added to the consolidated tax base of the group in the year of disposal and the costs relating to non-depreciable assets and the value for tax purposes of depreciable assets shall be deducted. The same rule shall apply to financial assets, with the exception of shares in affiliated undertakings, participating interests and own shares. To the extent to which the proceeds of disposal are added to the consolidated tax base of the group, they shall not otherwise be taxable.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 244 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 68
Self-generated intangible assets Where a taxpayer which is the economic owner of one or more self-generated intangible assets leaves the group, an amount equal to the costs incurred in respect of those assets for research, development, marketing and advertising in the previous five years shall be added to the consolidated tax base of the remaining group members. The amount added shall not, however, exceed the value of the assets on the departure of the taxpayer from the group. Those costs shall be attributed to the leaving taxpayer and shall be treated in accordance with national corporate tax law which becomes applicable to the taxpayer or, if it remains in the system provided for by this Directive, the rules of this Directive.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 246 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 69
Losses on leaving the group No losses shall be attributed to a group member leaving a group.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 247 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 70
Business reorganisations within a group 1. A business reorganisation within a group or the transfer of the legal seat of a taxpayer which is a member of a group shall not give rise to profits or losses for the purposes of determining the consolidated tax base. Article 59(3) shall apply. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, where, as a result of a business reorganisation or a series of transactions between members of a group within a period of two years, substantially all the assets of a taxpayer are transferred to another Member State and the asset factor is substantially changed, the following rules shall apply. In the five years that follow the transfer, the transferred assets shall be attributed to the asset factor of the transferring taxpayer as long as a member of the group continues to be the economic owner of the assets. If the taxpayer no longer exists or no longer has a permanent establishment in the Member State from which the assets were transferred it shall be deemed to have a permanent establishment there for the purpose of applying the provisions of this Article.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 248 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 71
Treatment of losses where a business reorganisation takes place between two or more groups 1. Where, as a result of a business reorganisation, one or more groups, or two or more members of a group, become part of another group, any unrelieved losses of the previously existing group or groups shall be allocated to each of the members of the latter in accordance with Articles 86 to 102, on the basis of the factors applicable to the tax year in which the business reorganisation takes place, and shall be carried forward for future years. 2. Where two or more principal taxpayers merge within the meaning of Article 2(a)(i) and (ii) of Council Directive 2009/133/EC19 , any unrelieved loss of a group shall be allocated to its members in accordance with Articles 86 to 102, on the basis of the factors applicable to the tax year in which the merger takes place, and shall be carried forward for future years.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 250 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 72
Exemption with progression Without prejudice to Article 75, revenue which is exempt from taxation under Article 11(c), (d) or (e) may be taken into account in determining the tax rate applicable to a taxpayer.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 253 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 73
Switch-over clause Article 11(c), (d) or (e) shall not apply where the entity which made the profit distributions, the entity the shares in which are disposed of or the permanent establishment were subject, in the entity's country of residence or the country in which the permanent establishment is situated, to one of the following: (a) a tax on profits, under the general regime in that third country, at a statutory corporate tax rate lower than 40% of the average statutory corporate tax rate applicable in the Member States; (b) a special regime in that third country that allows for a substantially lower level of taxation than the general regime. The average statutory corporate tax rate applicable in the Member States shall be published by the Commission annually. It shall be calculated as an arithmetic average. For the purpose of this Article and Articles 81 and 82, amendments to the rate shall first apply to taxpayers in their tax year starting after the amendment.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 259 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 74
Computation of income of a foreign permanent establishment Where Article 73 applies to the income of a permanent establishment in a third country, its revenues, expenses and other deductible items shall be determined according to the rules of the system provided for by this Directive.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 261 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 75
Disallowance of exempt share disposals Where, as a result of a disposal of shares, a taxpayer leaves the group and that taxpayer has within the current or previous tax years acquired in an intra- group transaction one or more fixed assets other than assets depreciated in a pool, an amount corresponding to those assets shall be excluded from the exemption unless it is demonstrated that the intra-group transactions were carried out for valid commercial reasons. The amount excluded from exemption shall be the market value of the asset or assets when transferred less the value for tax purposes of the assets or the costs referred to in Article 20 relating to fixed assets not subject to depreciation. When the beneficial owner of the shares disposed of is a non-resident taxpayer or a non-taxpayer, the market value of the asset or assets when transferred less the value for tax purposes shall be deemed to have been received by the taxpayer that held the assets prior to the intra-group transaction referred to in the first paragraph.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 265 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 76
Interest and royalties and any other income taxed at source 1. Where a taxpayer derives income which has been taxed in another Member State or in a third country, other than income which is exempt under Article 11(c), (d) or (e), a deduction from the tax liability of that taxpayer shall be allowed. 2. The deduction shall be shared among the members of a group according to the formula applicable in that tax year pursuant to Articles 86 to 102. 3. The deduction shall be calculated separately for each Member State or third country as well as for each type of income. It shall not exceed the amount resulting from subjecting the income attributed to a taxpayer or to a permanent establishment to the corporate tax rate of the Member State of the taxpayer's residence or where the permanent establishment is situated. 4. In calculating the deduction, the amount of the income shall be decreased by related deductible expenses, which shall be deemed to be 2% thereof unless the taxpayer proves otherwise. 5. The deduction for the tax liability in a third country may not exceed the final corporate tax liability of a taxpayer, unless an agreement concluded between the Member State of its residence and a third country states otherwise.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 269 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 77
Withholding tax Interest and royalties paid by a taxpayer to a recipient outside the group may be subject to a withholding tax in the Member State of the taxpayer according to the applicable rules of national law and any applicable double tax convention. The withholding tax shall be shared among the Member States according to the formula applicable in the tax year in which the tax is charged pursuant to Articles 86 to 102.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 286 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 86
General principles 1. The consolidated tax base shall be shared between the group members in each tax year on the basis of a formula for apportionment. In determining the apportioned share of a group member A, the formula shall take the following form, giving equal weight to the factors of sales, labour and assets: formula 2. The consolidated tax base of a group shall be shared only when it is positive. 3. The calculations for sharing the consolidated tax base shall be done at the end of the tax year of the group. 4. A period of 15 days or more in a calendar month shall be considered as a whole month.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 292 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 87
Safeguard clause As an exception to the rule set out in Article 86, if the principle taxpayer or a competent authority considers that the outcome of the apportionment to a group member does not fairly represent the extent of the business activity of that group member, the principal taxpayer or the authority concerned may request the use of an alternative method. If, following consultations among the competent authorities and, where applicable, discussions held in accordance with Article 132, all these authorities agree to the alternative method, it shall be used. The Member State of the principal tax authority shall inform the Commission about the alternative method used.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 293 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 88
Entering and leaving the group Where a company enters or leaves a group during a tax year, its apportioned share shall be computed proportionately having regard to the number of calendar months during which the company belonged to the group in the tax year.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 294 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 89
Transparent entities Where a taxpayer holds an interest in a transparent entity, the factors used in calculating its apportioned share shall include the sales, payroll and assets of the transparent entity, in proportion to the taxpayer's participation in its profits and losses.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 295 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 90
Composition of the labour factor 1. The labour factor shall consist, as to one half, of the total amount of the payroll of a group member as its numerator and the total amount of the payroll of the group as its denominator, and as to the other half, of the number of employees of a group member as its numerator and the number of employees of the group as its denominator. Where an individual employee is included in the labour factor of a group member, the amount of payroll relating to that employee shall also be allocated to the labour factor of that group member. 2. The number of employees shall be measured at the end of the tax year. 3. The definition of an employee shall be determined by the national law of the Member State where the employment is exercised.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 299 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 91
Allocation of employees and payroll 1. Employees shall be included in the labour factor of the group member from which they receive remuneration. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, where employees physically exercise their employment under the control and responsibility of a group member other than that from which they receive remuneration, those employees and the amount of payroll relating to them shall be included in the labour factor of the former. This rule shall only apply where the following conditions are met: (a) this employment lasts for an uninterrupted period of at least three months; (b) such employees represent at least 5% of the overall number of employees of the group member from which they receive remuneration. 3. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, employees shall include persons who, though not employed directly by a group member, perform tasks similar to those performed by employees. 4. The term ‘payroll’ shall include the cost of salaries, wages, bonuses and all other employee compensation, including related pension and social security costs borne by the employer. 5. Payroll costs shall be valued at the amount of such expenses which are treated as deductible by the employer in a tax year.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 304 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 92
Composition of the asset factor 1. The asset factor shall consist of the average value of all fixed tangible assets owned, rented or leased by a group member as its numerator and the average value of all fixed tangible assets owned, rented or leased by the group as its denominator. 2. In the five years that follow a taxpayer's entry into an existing or new group, its asset factor shall also include the total amount of costs incurred for research, development, marketing and advertising by the taxpayer over the six years that preceded its entry into the group.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 305 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 93
Allocation of assets 1. An asset shall be included in the asset factor of its economic owner. If the economic owner cannot be identified, the asset shall be included in the asset factor of the legal owner. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, if an asset is not effectively used by its economic owner, the asset shall be included in the factor of the group member that effectively uses the asset. However, this rule shall only apply to assets that represent more than 5% of the value for tax purposes of all fixed tangible assets of the group member that effectively uses the asset. 3. Except in the case of leases between group members, leased assets shall be included in the asset factor of the group member which is the lessor or the lessee of the asset. The same shall apply to rented assets.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 306 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 94
Valuation 1. Land and other non-depreciable fixed tangible assets shall be valued at their original cost. 2. An individually depreciable fixed tangible asset shall be valued at the average of its value for tax purposes at the beginning and at the end of a tax year. Where, as a result of one or more intra- group transactions, an individually depreciable fixed tangible asset is included in the asset factor of a group member for less than a tax year, the value to be taken into account shall be calculated having regard to the whole number of months. 3. The pool of fixed assets shall be valued at the average of its value for tax purposes at the beginning and at the end of a tax year. 4. Where the renter or lessee of an asset is not its economic owner, it shall value rented or leased assets at eight times the net annual rental or lease payment due, less any amounts receivable from sub- rentals or sub-leases. Where a group member rents out or leases an asset but is not its economic owner, it shall value the rented or leased assets at eight times the net annual rental or lease payment due. 5. Where, following an intra-group transfer in the same or the previous tax year, a group member sells an asset outside the group, the asset shall be included in the asset factor of the transferring group member for the period between the intra-group transfer and the sale outside the group. This rule shall not apply where the group members concerned demonstrate that the intra- group transfer was made for genuine commercial reasons.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 310 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 95
Composition of the sales factor 1. The sales factor shall consist of the total sales of a group member (including a permanent establishment which is deemed to exist by virtue of the second subparagraph of Article 70(2) as its numerator and the total sales of the group as its denominator. 2. Sales shall mean the proceeds of all sales of goods and supplies of services after discounts and returns, excluding value added tax, other taxes and duties. Exempt revenues, interest, dividends, royalties and proceeds from the disposal of fixed assets shall not be included in the sales factor, unless they are revenues earned in the ordinary course of trade or business. Intra-group sales of goods and supplies of services shall not be included. 3. Sales shall be valued according to Article 22.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 312 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 96
Sales by destination 1. Sales of goods shall be included in the sales factor of the group member located in the Member State where dispatch or transport of the goods to the person acquiring them ends. If this place is not identifiable, the sales of goods shall be attributed to the group member located in the Member State of the last identifiable location of the goods. 2. Supplies of services shall be included in the sales factor of the group member located in the Member State where the services are physically carried out. 3. Where exempt revenues, interest, dividends and royalties and the proceeds from the disposal of assets are included in the sales factor, they shall be attributed to the beneficiary. 4. If there is no group member in the Member State where goods are delivered or services are carried out, or if goods are delivered or services are carried out in a third country, the sales shall be included in the sales factor of all group members in proportion to their labour and asset factors. 5. If there is more than one group member in the Member State where goods are delivered or services are carried out, the sales shall be included in the sales factor of all group members located in that Member State in proportion to their labour and asset factors.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 313 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 97
Rules on calculation of factors The Commission may adopt acts laying down detailed rules on the calculation of the labour, asset and sales factors, the allocation of employees and payroll, assets and sales to the respective factor and the valuation of assets. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 131(2).deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 315 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 98
Financial institutions 1. The following entities shall be regarded as financial institutions: (a) credit institutions authorised to operate in the Union in accordance with Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council20 ; (b) entities, except for insurance undertakings as defined in Article 99, which hold financial assets amounting to 80% or more of all their fixed assets, as valued in accordance with the rules of this Directive. 2. The asset factor of a financial institution shall include 10% of the value of financial assets, except for participating interests and own shares. Financial assets shall be included in the asset factor of the group member in the books of which they were recorded when it became a member of the group. 3. The sales factor of a financial institution shall include 10% of its revenues in the form of interest, fees, commissions and revenues from securities, excluding value added tax, other taxes and duties. For the purposes of Article 96(2), financial services shall be deemed to be carried out, in the case of a secured loan, in the Member State in which the security is situated or, if this Member State cannot be identified, the Member State in which the security is registered. Other financial services shall be deemed to be carried out in the Member State of the borrower or of the person who pays fees, commissions or other revenue. If the borrower or the person who pays fees, commissions or other revenue cannot be identified or if the Member State in which the security is situated or registered cannot be identified, the sales shall be attributed to all group members in proportion to their labour and asset factors.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 316 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 99
Insurance Undertakings 1. The term ‘insurance undertakings’ shall mean those undertakings authorised to operate in the Member States in accordance with Directive 73/239/EEC for non-life insurance, 2002/83/EC for life insurance and Directive 2005/68/EC for reinsurance. 2. The asset factor of insurance undertakings shall include 10% of the value of financial assets as provided for in Article 98(2). 3. The sales factor of insurance undertakings shall include 10% of all earned premiums, net of reinsurance, allocated investment returns transferred from the non-technical account, other technical revenues, net of reinsurance, and investment revenues, fees and commissions, excluding value added tax, other taxes and duties. For the purposes of Article 96(2), insurance services shall be deemed to be carried out in the Member State of the policy holder. Other sales shall be attributed to all group members in proportion to their labour and asset factors.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 317 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 100
Oil and gas Notwithstanding Article 96(1), (2) and (3), sales of a group member conducting its principal business in the field of the exploration or production of oil or gas shall be attributed to the group member in the Member State where the oil or gas is to be extracted or produced. Notwithstanding Article 96(4) and (5), if there is no group member in the Member State of exploration or production of oil and gas or the exploration or production takes place in a third country where the group member which carries on the exploration or production of oil and gas does not maintain a permanent establishment, the sales shall be attributed to that group member.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 318 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 101
Shipping, inland waterways transport and air transport The revenues, expenses and other deductible items of a group member whose principal business is the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic or the operation of boats engaged in inland waterways transport shall not be apportioned according to the formula referred to in Article 86 but shall be attributed to that group member. Such a group member shall be excluded from the calculation of the apportionment formula.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 319 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 102
Items deductible against the apportioned share The apportioned share shall be adjusted by the following items: (a) unrelieved losses incurred by a taxpayer before entering the system provided for by this Directive, as provided for in Article 64; (b) unrelieved losses incurred at the level of the group, as provided for in Article 64 in conjunction with Article 66(b) and in Article 71; (c) the amounts relating to the disposal of fixed assets as provided for in Article 61, revenues and expenses related to long- term contracts as provided for in Article 62 and future expenses as provided for in Article 63; (d) In the case of insurance undertakings, optional technical provisions as provided for in Article 30(c); (e) the taxes listed in Annex III where a deduction is provided for under national rules.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 320 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 103
Tax liability The tax liability of each group member shall be the outcome of the application of the national tax rate to the apportioned share, adjusted according to Article 102, and further reduced by the deductions provided for in Articles 76.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 324 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 104
Notice to opt 1. A single taxpayer shall opt for the system provided for by this Directive by giving notice to the competent authority of the Member State in which it is resident or, in respect of a permanent establishment of a non-resident taxpayer, that establishment is situated. In the case of a group, the principal taxpayer shall give notice, on behalf of the group, to the principal tax authority. Such notice shall be given at least three months before the beginning of the tax year in which the taxpayer or the group wishes to begin applying the system. 2. The notice to opt shall cover all group members. However, shipping companies subject to a special taxation regime may be excluded from the group. 3. The principal tax authority shall transmit the notice to opt immediately to the competent authorities of all Member States in which group members are resident or established. Those authorities may submit to the principal tax authority, within one month of the transmission, their views and any relevant information on the validity and scope of the notice to opt.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 337 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 105
Term of a Group 1. When the notice to opt has been accepted, a single taxpayer or a group, as the case may be, shall apply the system provided for by this Directive for five tax years. Following the expiry of that initial term, the single taxpayer or the group shall continue to apply the system for successive terms of three tax years unless it gives notice of termination. A notice of termination may be given by a taxpayer to its competent authority or, in the case of a group, by the principal taxpayer to the principal tax authority in the three months preceding the end of the initial term or of a subsequent term. 2. Where a taxpayer or a non-taxpayer joins a group, the term of the group shall not be affected. Where a group joins another group or two or more groups merge, the enlarged group shall continue to apply the system until the later of the expiry dates of the terms of the groups, unless exceptional circumstances make it more appropriate to apply a shorter period. 3. Where a taxpayer leaves a group or a group terminates, the taxpayer or taxpayers shall continue to apply the system for the remainder of the current term of the group.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 348 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 106
Information in the notice to opt The following information shall be included in the notice to opt: (a) the identification of the taxpayer or of the members of the group; (b) in respect of a group, proof of fulfilment of the criteria laid down in Articles 54 and 55; (c) identification of any associated enterprises as referred to in Articles 78; (d) the legal form, statutory seat and place of effective management of the taxpayers; (e) the tax year to be applied. The Commission may adopt an act establishing a standard form of the notice to opt. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 131(2).deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 362 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 107
Control of the notice to opt 1. The competent authority to which the notice to opt is validly submitted shall examine whether, on the basis of the information contained in the notice, the group fulfils the requirements of this Directive. Unless the notice is rejected within three months of its receipt, it shall be deemed to have been accepted. 2. Provided that the taxpayer has fully disclosed all relevant information in accordance with Article 106, any subsequent determination that the disclosed list of group members is incorrect shall not invalidate the notice to opt. The notice shall be corrected, and all other necessary measures shall be taken, from the beginning of the tax year when the discovery is made. Where there has not been full disclosure, the principal tax authority, in agreement with the other competent authorities concerned, may invalidate the original notice to opt.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 368 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 108
Tax year 1. All members of a group shall have the same tax year. 2. In the year in which it joins an existing group, a taxpayer shall bring its tax year into line with that of the group. The apportioned share of the taxpayer for that tax year shall be calculated proportionately having regard to the number of calendar months during which the company belonged to the group. 3. The apportioned share of a taxpayer for the year in which it leaves a group shall be calculated proportionately having regard to the number of calendar months during which the company belonged to the group. 4. Where a single taxpayer joins a group, it shall be treated as though its tax year terminated on the day before joining.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 371 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 109
Filing a tax return 1. A single taxpayer shall file its tax return with the competent authority. In the case of a group, the principal taxpayer shall file the consolidated tax return of the group with the principal tax authority. 2. The return shall be treated as an assessment of the tax liability of each group member. Where the law of a Member State provides that a tax return has the legal status of a tax assessment and is to be treated as an instrument permitting the enforcement of tax debts, the consolidated tax return shall have the same effect in relation to a group member liable for tax in that Member State. 3. Where the consolidated tax return does not have the legal status of a tax assessment for the purposes of enforcing a tax debt, the competent authority of a Member State may, in respect of a group member which is resident or situated there, issue an instrument of national law authorising enforcement in the Member State. That instrument shall incorporate the data in the consolidated tax return concerning the group member. Appeals shall be permitted against the instrument exclusively on grounds of form and not to the underlying assessment. The procedure shall be governed by the national law of the relevant Member State. 4. Where a permanent establishment is deemed to exist pursuant to the third paragraph of Article 61, the principal taxpayer shall be responsible for all procedural obligations relating to the taxation of such a permanent establishment. 5. The tax return of a single taxpayer shall be filed within the period provided for in the law of the Member State in which it is resident or in which it has a permanent establishment. The consolidated tax return shall be filed in the nine months that follow the end of the tax year.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 372 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 110
Content of tax return 1. The tax return of a single taxpayer shall include the following information: (a) the identification of the taxpayer; (b) the tax year to which the tax return relates; (c) the calculation of the tax base; (d) identification of any associated enterprises as referred to in Article 78. 2. The consolidated tax return shall include the following information: (a) the identification of the principal taxpayer; (b) the identification of all group members; (c) identification of any associated enterprises as referred to in Article 78; (d) the tax year to which the tax return relates; (e) the calculation of the tax base of each group member; (f) the calculation of the consolidated tax base; (g) the calculation of the apportioned share of each group member; (h) the calculation of the tax liability of each group member.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 374 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 111
Notification of errors in the tax return The principal taxpayer shall notify the principal tax authority of errors in the consolidated tax return. The principal tax authority shall, where appropriate, issue an amended assessment according to Article 114(3).deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 375 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 112
Failure to file a tax return Where the principal taxpayer fails to file a consolidated tax return, the principal tax authority shall issue an assessment within three months based on an estimate, taking into account such information as is available. The principal taxpayer may appeal against such an assessment.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 376 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 113
Rules on electronic filing, tax returns and supporting documentation The Commission may adopt acts laying down rules on electronic filing, on the form of the tax return, on the form of the consolidated tax return, and on the supporting documentation required. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 131(2).deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 377 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 114
Amended assessments 1. In relation to a single taxpayer, audits and assessments shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which it is resident or in which it has a permanent establishment. 2. The principal tax authority shall verify that the consolidated tax return complies with Article 110(2). 3. The principal tax authority may issue an amended assessment not later than three years after the final date for filing the consolidated tax return or, where no return was filed before that date, not later than three years following issuance of an assessment pursuant to Article 112. An amended assessment may not be issued more than once in any period of 12 months. 4. Paragraph 3 shall not apply where an amended assessment is issued in compliance with a decision of the courts of the Member State of the principal tax authority according to Article 123 or with the result of a mutual agreement or arbitration procedure with a third country. Such amended assessments shall be issued within 12 months of the decision of the courts of the principal tax authority or the completion of the procedure. 5. Notwithstanding paragraph 3, an amended assessment may be issued within six years of the final date for filing the consolidated tax return where it is justified by a deliberate or grossly negligent misstatement on the part of a taxpayer, or within 12 years of that date where the misstatement is the subject of criminal proceedings. Such an amended assessment shall be issued within 12 months of the discovery of the misstatement, unless a longer period is objectively justified by the need for further inquiries or investigations. Any such amended assessment shall relate solely to the subject-matter of the misstatement. 6. Prior to issuing an amended assessment, the principal tax authority shall consult the competent authorities of the Member States in which a group member is resident or established. Those authorities may express their views within one month of consultation. The competent authority of a Member State in which a group member is resident or established may call on the principal tax authority to issue an amended assessment. Failure to issue such an assessment within three months shall be deemed to be a refusal to do so. 7. No amended assessment shall be issued in order to adjust the consolidated tax base where the difference between the declared base and the corrected base does not exceed the lower of EUR 5,000 or 1% of the consolidated tax base. No amended assessment shall be issued in order to adjust the calculation of the apportioned shares where the total of the apportioned shares of the group members resident or established in a Member State would be adjusted by less than 0.5%.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 378 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 115
Central data base The consolidated tax return and supporting documents filed by the principal taxpayer shall be stored on a central data base to which all the competent authorities shall have access. The central data base shall be regularly updated with all further information and documents and all decisions and notices issued by the principal tax authority.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 382 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 116
Designation of the principal taxpayer The principal taxpayer designated in accordance with Article 4(6) may not subsequently be changed. However, where the principal taxpayer ceases to meet the criteria in Article 4(6) a new principal taxpayer shall be designated by the group. In exceptional circumstances the competent tax authorities of the Member States in which the members of a group are resident or in which they have a permanent establishment may, within six months of the notice to opt or within six months of a reorganisation involving the principal taxpayer, decide by common agreement that a taxpayer other than the taxpayer designated by the group shall be the principal taxpayer.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 384 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 117
Record-keeping A single taxpayer and, in the case of a group, each group member shall keep records and supporting documents in sufficient detail to ensure the proper implementation of this Directive and to allow audits to be carried out.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 385 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 118
Provision of information to the competent authorities On a request from the competent authority of the Member State in which it is resident or in which its permanent establishment is situated, a taxpayer shall provide all information relevant to the determination of its tax liability. On a request from the principal tax authority, the principal taxpayer shall provide all information relevant to the determination of the consolidated tax base or of the tax liability of any group member.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 386 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 119
Request for an opinion by the competent authority 1. A taxpayer may request an opinion from the competent authority of the Member State in which it is resident or in which it has a permanent establishment on the implementation of this Directive to a specific transaction or series of transactions planned to be carried out. A taxpayer may also request an opinion regarding the proposed composition of a group. The competent authority shall take all possible steps to respond to the request within a reasonable time. Provided that all relevant information concerning the planned transaction or series of transactions is disclosed, the opinion issued by the competent authority shall be binding on it, unless the courts of the Member State of the principal tax authority subsequently decide otherwise pursuant to Article 123. If the taxpayer disagrees with the opinion, it may act in accordance with its own interpretation but must draw attention to that fact in its tax return or consolidated tax return. 2. Where two or more group members in different Member States are directly involved in a specific transaction or a series of transactions, or where the request concerns the proposed composition of a group, the competent authorities of those Member States shall agree on a common opinion.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 387 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 120
Communication between competent authorities 1. Information communicated pursuant to this Directive shall, to the extent possible, be provided by electronic means, through making use of the common communication network/common system interface (CCN/CSI). 2. When a competent authority receives a request for cooperation or exchange of information concerning a group member pursuant to Directive 2011/16/EU, it shall respond no later than in three months following the date of receipt of the request.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 388 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 121
Secrecy clause 1. All information made known to a Member State under this Directive shall be kept secret in that Member State in the same manner as information received under its domestic legislation. In any case, such information: (a) may be made available only to the persons directly involved in the assessment of the tax or in the administrative control of this assessment; (b) may in addition be made known only in connection with judicial proceedings or administrative proceedings involving sanctions undertaken with a view to, or relating to, the making or reviewing the tax assessment and only to persons who are directly involved in such proceedings; such information may, however, be disclosed during public hearings or in judgements if the competent authority of the Member State supplying the information raises no objection; (c) shall in no circumstances be used other than for taxation purposes or in connection with judicial proceedings or administrative proceedings involving sanctions undertaken with a view to, or in relation to, the making or reviewing the tax assessment. In addition, Member States may provide for the information referred to in the first subparagraph to be used for assessment of other levies, duties and taxes covered by Article 2 of Council Directive 2008/55/EC21 . 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the competent authority of the Member State providing the information may permit it to be used for other purposes in the requesting State, if, under the legislation of the informing State, the information could, in similar circumstances, be used in the informing State for similar purposes.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 389 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 122
Audits 1. The principal tax authority may initiate and coordinate audits of group members. An audit may also be initiated on the request of a competent authority. The principal tax authority and the other competent authorities concerned shall jointly determine the scope and content of an audit and the group members to be audited. 2. An audit shall be conducted in accordance with the national legislation of the Member State in which it is carried out, subject to such adjustments as are necessary in order to ensure proper implementation of this Directive. 3. The principal tax authority shall compile the results of all audits.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 392 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 123
Disagreement between Member States 1. Where the competent authority of the Member State in which a group member is resident or established disagrees with a decision of the principal tax authority made pursuant to Articles 107 or Article 114 paragraphs (3), (5) or (6) second subparagraph, it may challenge that decision before the courts of the Member State of the principal tax authority within a period of three months. 2. The competent authority shall have at least the same procedural rights as a taxpayer enjoys under the law of that Member State in proceedings against a decision of the principal tax authority.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 395 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 124
Appeals 1. A principal taxpayer may appeal against the following acts: (a) a decision rejecting a notice to opt; (b) a notice requesting the disclosure of documents or information; (c) an amended assessment; (d) an assessment on the failure to file a consolidated tax return. The appeal shall be lodged within 60 days of the receipt of the act appealed against. 2. An appeal shall not have any suspensory effect on the tax liability of a taxpayer. 3. Notwithstanding Article 114(3), an amended assessment may be issued to give effect to the result of an appeal.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 399 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 125
Administrative appeals 1. Appeals against amended assessments or assessments made pursuant to Article 112 shall be heard by an administrative body which is competent to hear appeals at first instance according to the law of the Member State of the principal tax authority. If, in that Member State, there is no such competent administrative body, the principal taxpayer may lodge directly a judicial appeal. 2. In making submissions to the administrative body, the principal tax authority shall act in close consultation with the other competent authorities. 3. An administrative body may, where appropriate, order evidence to be provided by the principal taxpayer and the principal tax authority on the fiscal affairs of the group members and other associated enterprises and on the law and practices of the other Member States concerned. The competent authorities of the other Member States concerned shall provide all necessary assistance to the principal tax authority. 4. Where the administrative body varies the decision of the principal tax authority, the varied decision shall take the place of the latter and shall be treated as the decision of the principal tax authority. 5. The administrative body shall decide the appeal within six months. If no decision is received by the principal taxpayer within that period, the decision of the principal tax authority shall be deemed to have been confirmed. 6. Where the decision is confirmed or varied, the principal taxpayer shall have the right to appeal directly to the courts of the Member State of the principal tax authority within 60 days of the receipt of the decision of the administrative appeals body. 7. Where the decision is annulled, the administrative body shall remit the matter to the principal tax authority, which shall take a new decision within 60 days of the date on which the decision of the administrative body is notified to it. The principal taxpayer may appeal against any such new decision either pursuant to paragraph 1 or directly to the courts of the Member State of the principal tax authority within 60 days of receipt of the decision. If the principal tax authority does not take a new decision within 60 days, the principal taxpayer may appeal against the original decision of the principal tax authority before the courts of the Member State of the principal tax authority.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 400 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 126
Judicial appeals 1. A judicial appeal against a decision of the principal tax authority shall be governed by the law of the Member State of that principal tax authority, subject to paragraph 3. 2. In making submissions to the courts, the principal tax authority shall act in close consultation with the other competent authorities. 3. A national court may, where appropriate, order evidence to be provided by the principal taxpayer and the principal tax authority on the fiscal affairs of the group members and other associated enterprises and on the law and practices of the other Member States concerned. The competent authorities of the other Member States concerned shall provide all necessary assistance to the principal tax authority.deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 417 #

2011/0058(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 133 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall, five years after the entry into force of this Directive, review its application and report to the Council on the operation of this Directive. The report shall in particular include an analysis of the impact of the mechanism set up in Chapter XVI of this Directive on the distribution of the tax bases between the Member States. When reviewing this Directive, consideration should be in particular given to introduction of an obligatory system of Common Corporate Tax Base.
2011/12/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 89 #

2010/2307(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Believes that the European and National Qualifications Framework should support smoother transition from education to the labour market;
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2010/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the future ESF reflects the specificities and needs of Member States and regions especially with regards to needs of local labour markets and to a need to create and improve entrepreneurship;
2011/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2010/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to involve the social partnand business partners, academia, NGOs and other relevant stakeholders at national and local levels in order to better identify the needs of the labour market;
2011/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2010/2305(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to review the level of co-financing, to reflect better the level of developmentabsorption capacities and development opportunities of beneficiaries; calls on the Member States to create mechanisms for helping the small beneficiaries preparing for applications and during the period of implementation;
2011/05/03
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph - 1 a (new)
-1a. Welcomes the publication of the Green Book towards adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems; recognises that a wide debate on the future of pension systems in Europe is of vital importance and should take into account current economic and demographic situation, completion of the Single Market, reform of the economic governance as well as recently established European supervisory architecture;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 4 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that both the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines and the Stability and Growth Pact refer to age-related public expenditures; recognises that the correct inclusion of pension liabilities is onlyin public debt and deficit of public pension liabilities and assets in mandatory public systems, regardless whether they are managed by public or private entities, is one of many conditions for sustainability; requests that the economic governance reform takes this dimension duly into account;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 19 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Having in mind that a sustainable and well functioning pension system is extremely important to the stability of public finances, calls on the Commission to promote a system which would fairly take into account full costs of pension reforms when initiating decisions linked to the excessive deficit proceduresand the Council to recognise the problem of various Member States with excessive debts and deficits due to statistics used to calculate pension liabilities in their system of public finance; considers that the current reform of the Stability and Growth Pact can be completed successfully only if this fundamental inefficiency- affecting at least 9 Member States- is corrected by e.g. taking into account full costs of pension reforms when initiating decisions linked to the excessive deficit and debt procedure; expresses serious concerns that the current situation acts as a disincentive for introducing necessary reforms and that some Member States have or are considering to scale back their pension reforms in order to reduce government deficit;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that sustainable public finances require including the total of public and private debt in the assessment; recalls that pension savings are not only savings earmarked as pension; requests that the full scale of unfunded public sector pension liabilities is made transparent by including these in the government debt-to- GDP ratio;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 41 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Observes that pension reforms are necessary in the context of demographic ageing and the financial and economic crisis, but; notes at the same time that the first objectiensuring adequate retirement income for all is of great importance; underlines, however, that in order to achieve adequate pension levels the system must be safe and sustainable; at the same time, recalls that it is up to the Member States to set up a minimum level of a reform should be to ensure adequate retirement income for allpensions that relates to their standard of living and is affordable for their national public system; recalls that the application of an "one fits all approach" would require thorough studies on the practicability and consequent effects on Member States' pension systems;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the EU has a strong role to play in developing a definition of an adequate retirement benefit, in the form of a set of goods and services that older people need to enjoy for a decent life;deleted
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 65 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises that there is no perfect pension system that take into account the specificities of all Member States, but is convinced that a balanced multi pillar system of public, work related and private as well as funded and unfunded schemes should be found; is of the opinion that each Member State should define a minimum target income level after retirement so as to avoid raising poverty among ageing population;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 70 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the terminology used to define pension systems in various Member States is not the same (e.g. the classic three-pillar approach is not always valid); therefore calls on the Commission to make the necessary efforts to come up with a typology of pension systems in Member States as well as with a common set of definitions in order to make systems comparable;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Observes that even if more pension products exist on the market, not every European citizen has access to these; recognises the need to improve the access of people with lower income level to existing pension products;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 79 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that long-term investment in pension systems requires a positive approach as part of economic governance and more particularly in the Stability and Growth Pact; considers that the efforts made by countries to introduce pension reforms which resulted in an increase in their debt and deficits should be recognised and not penalised when assessing the stability of public finances in the short and long term;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Realises that workers generally do not work until their notional statutory retirement age; stresses that the firstone priority in reaching sustainability is to ensure workers‘ ability to work until that age by implementing adequate employment and social enhancing policies such as discouraging early retirement, introducing financial incentives, securing life long learning and adequate healthcare;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 85 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that a higher level of employment is the best response to economic growth is a precondition to reach a higher level of employment thus ensureing the financial base of public pension schemes and; notes therefore that the EU should focus on the way to achieve a high level of participation in the labour market and a high employment rate; and sustainable economic growth and a high employment rate; therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to facilitate reforms of labour markets with the aim of factoring in flexicurity principles, modernise social protection systems and create the environment for companies to create jobs;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 93 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the increase in retirement age needs to be correlated with life expectancy and working conditions; believes that a clear communication by governments on such policy initiatives is vital and helps citizens to understand the need for reforms as well as which level of retirement income they may expect;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 112 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets that the Green Paper does not devote any attention to the gender issue, particularly bearing in mind that, because of disparities very often because of shorter working careers, lower wages and a lower retirement age in some Member States, women have smaller pensions on average;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Observes that the implementation of the IORP Directive by Member States generally has been delayed; understands that Member States have had difficulty in incorporating these new rules and principles in their national system; therefore calls on the Commission to take the requisite action to accelerate the proper implementation of the Directive;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 124 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Recalls that the IORP Directive is applicable only to occupational retirement schemes and should not apply to any public pension liabilities;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 125 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Agrees that a high degree of security for future pensioners, at a reasonable cost for the sponsoring undertakings and in the context of sustainable pension systems, should be the goal;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 146 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that principles of Solvency II iscould be a valuable starting point forcontribution when developing a solvency regime for IORPs; underlines that such a regime however bearing in mind that risks of the insurance sector are different from those faced by IORPs; notes, that any changes to the solvency regime for IORPs needs to be adapted to the specificities of pensions, in particular as regards the conditionality of pension rights, the duration of pension portfolios and the dedicated purpose vehicle operating a homogenous product portfolio; believes that a potential revision of solvency rules for IORPs should be carried out within the existing IORP Directive; in this regard, calls on the Commission to support the harmonization of tax system of pension fund products; at the same time, recalls that occupational pension systems in Member States vary to an even greater extent that public pension systems;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 161 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 15
15. Considers the qualitative elements of Solvency II to be of great importancecould be adopted for their application to IORPs; notes that this applies in particular to requirements in relation to good risk management;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 167 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recalls that any proposals for new legislation or changes to current legislation should be subject to a thorough impact assessment process;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 168 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that, within the diversity of pension systems, the general systems (first pillar) combined with work-related systems (second pillar) afforddiversification of pension income from a mix of public, work-related and private, as well as funded and unfunded, schemes offers the best guarantee of adequate pension provision;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 17
17. Is of the opinionRecalls that the newly established European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) shoulmust make full use of its competences and play an important role in the development of a solvency regime for pension funds in general and IORPs more specificallying legal provisions with regards to IORPs such as a solvency regime;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 176 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to closely follow the implementation of this Directive, take action against Member States where justified and when reviewing the Directive to take account of the specific situation concerning the financing obligations of the employer vis- à-vis the employee or its pension fund; is of the opinion that as a principle employee's pension rights provided by employers should be fully funded and separated from that employer;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 192 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that more choice is not always better; underlines that the subject matter is of low interest to employees and very complex; is of the opinion that default options should be available, preferably with mandatory membership and that opt- outs should be limited;deleted
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 201 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls that President Barroso has put pensions as a priority already during his first term; is of the opinion that so far a coherent and comprehensive approach was lackingis needed; welcomes the Green Paper as a first step to such an approach; looks forward to concrete legislative proposals in the near future; recalls that any concrete legislative proposal needs to take due account of the principle of subsidiarity;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 205 #

2010/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to organise itself with an increased focus on pensions byconsider setting up a special task force chaired by President Barossoon pensions, involving the competences related to pension issues of all relevant DGs, in particular DGs ECFIN, MARKT, EMPL, TAXUD, SANCO and the Services of Eurostat and the ECB.;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 205 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that national budgets are under severe pressure and that many Member States are reviewing the efficiency of expenditure; calls on Member States to consider introducing compensation so that all taxpayers who cannot achieve the level of ambition in the first and second pillars are entitled to a supplementary offset of pension contributions in the second pillar or of contributions to private pension schemes in the third pillar; notes that this could also help Member States to establish a three-pillar structuremake sure that short-term public finance pressures do not affect the long-term stability of public finances and pension systems; therefore calls on Member States to ensure the best possible mix of forms of pension provision in the future and improve citizens' access to private saving possibilities;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 256 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that there are major disparities in the statutory retirement age and in the actual age at which older people cease to be employed; recognises that priority should be given to ensuring that employees can work until the statutory retirement age; calls on Member States and the two sides of industry, therefore, to exchange information about good experiences and to conclude agreements leading to a prolongation of working life, for example by reducing early retirement possibilities and rewarding people who work for longer;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 363 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Considers that, because of the diversity and complexity of the various second- pillaroccupational pension systems, conditions need to be laid down concerning the portability of acquired pension entitlements in the sense that portability begins when new contracts are concluded, an application for transfer being approved only if the actuarial sum transferred is to be placed in a fund whose purpose is payment of old-age pensions; considers that tax must be calculated and paid in the Member State where the entitlements have been accumulated;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 380 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that in many Member States the importance of second-pillar pension provision has been recognised, and that it must also be ensured that such provision meets European conditions and criteria applicable to second-pillar provision; at the same time, notes that in cases where Member States have mandatory pension funds managed by private institutions, such schemes should also be reviewed from the point of view of compliance with European conditions and criteria as regards security, investment and asset classification;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 400 #

2010/2239(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission to investigate how employees' right to participate in the second pillar can be facilitated and to make proposals for developpromoting such a pillar where it does not yet exist;
2011/01/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2010/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Draws attention to the fact that social cohesioneconomic, social and territorial cohesion are fundamental principles in determining all EU policies and activities, as laid down in Article 74 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and that their implementation should take due account of the provisions of Article 9 of the TFEU;
2010/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 5 #

2010/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Affirms that the goal of cohesion policiesy should be sustainable, smart and inclusive economic growth evenly spread both territorially and socially, reduction of development disparities between regions, job creation and the implementation of the European social model, which constitutes a factor of cohesion and competitiveness for the European economy;
2010/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2010/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that, to ensure the success of the Europe 2020 strategy, EU social and territorial cohesion policiecohesion policy and its instruments should be closely interconnected within a new framework establishing strong synergies between EU policies and all the structural funds; stresses that the European Social Fund is the onlymain instrument specifically aimed at the labour market and social inclusion and that it therefore needs to be strengthened;
2010/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 24 #

2010/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that, in order to be used profitably, the ESF must focus on creating job opportunities, investing in skills, ongoing training and retraining, the proper functioning of the labour market and social conditions, with a view to promoting employability, productivity, growth and employment in Europe;
2010/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2010/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to increasestrengthen the ESF's contributionrole in the context of the future architecture of the Structural Funds; considers that the ESF should be brought under a regulation and a basic strategic framework laying down general provisions on the cohesion funds, while maintaining its own rules, and operational and funding arrangementspolicy;
2010/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2010/2160(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for reform of the Structural Funds with a view to streamlining procedures and rules for their use, improving the monitoring system and enhancing the transparency of fund allocation in order to make the EU's cohesion policiesy more visible.
2010/12/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 2 #

2010/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that demographic projections on old-age dependency ratios indicate increasing polarisation between regions, as by 2020 there will be 40 regions where the ratio is at least 25% above the EU average, creating, apart from the pension and health care systems, serious challenges with regard to care of the elderly, the adequacy and training of the workforce, and many other social concerns;
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 20 #

2010/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. ESF funding should be used to support the development of care services, including long-term care for the elderly as a new potential sector of the services market as well as a mean to reach higher employment rates, particularly among women-carers.
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 27 #

2010/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – indent 1
– supporting families with a view to reverincreasing the decline in the birthfertility rate,
2011/02/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission's strategic report on the implementation of the cohesion policy programmes cofinanced by the Structural Funds (2007-2013) (COM(2010)110); considers, however, that in the aftermath of the global economic recession, thfuture Commission's reports should provide a more thorough updated evaluation of the impact of the projects selected,cohesion policy on recovery of the European economy, in particular in terms of creating new jobs, reducing socioeconomic disparities, enhancing social inclusion and improving human capital;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Expects, that efficient and quantifiable initiatives from the Member States - financed by the ESF - will contribute to the delivery of the poverty goal of the EU 2020 Strategy;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Calls on the Commission to introduce into future reports a reference to mutual interaction and complementarity of the Structural Funds as well as to their interaction with other EU financial instruments;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the progress already made in implementing projects relevant to the ‘More and better jobs’ Guideline; strongly recommends however that the mobilisation of resources for the achievement of the poverty reduction target of the Europe 2020 Strategy should become a priorityEurope 2020 Strategy and its objectives, in particular in the field of employment and social affairs, should become a priority in order to boost growth and productivity and improve employment performance in Europe;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 21 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Regrets that financial resources from the EFS made available by the Community are not fully used;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 23 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on Member States to improve flexibility of the funds, simplify procedures and reduce excessive administrative costs and obstacles that hamper policy goals regarding access to employment, combating poverty and development of skills; recognises that ‘earmarking’ discipline has improved implementation of the programmes;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to boost the effectiveness of the ESF in guaranteeing opportunities for European citizens to make themselves employable and adaptable and in generating the conditions for smart, sustainable growthand inclusive growth; therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to secure strong synergies between structural funds and relevant European policies as well as promote projects that meet demands of the labour market;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Urges Member States to intensify their focus on education and training of workers with reference to high-quality and future-oriented jobs in the knowledge-oriented society;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 41 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Bearing in mind that the ESF is a basic tool against poverty, social exclusion and unemploymentimed at improving employment and job opportunities, promoting adaptation of workers' skills to demands of the labour market, improving integration into the labour market and reinforcing social inclusion, calls on the Commission to strengthen the ESF's potential, financial autonomy and as a vital component of the Cohesion Policy, improve its flexibility and to simplify and harmonise procedures, follow-up and controls; calls on the Commission to ensure maximal complementarity and mutual interaction between the ESF and the ERDF as well as with other financial instruments;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Welcomes the fact, that more than 50% of people who were reached by ESF programmes were women; expects the Commission and Member States to pay enhanced attention to the integration of older workers into the labour market considering demographic developments;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Expects a closer cooperation between the Commission and the Member States in order to react quicker and in a more efficient way to changes on the labour market and to implement necessary, result-orientated, measures;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2010/2139(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Welcomes the fact, that ESF provided relevant support to implement labour- market reforms and proved to be an effective instrument contributing to the shift from passive to active and even preventive labour market policies; calls on the Member States to continue with structural reforms that will prevent labour markets from potential future crisis;
2010/11/16
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. Whereas economic coordination needs to be strengthened throughout the Union, given that the economic stability of the European Union may depend on the economic situation of one of its members, that there is a very high degree of economic interdependence between all the Member States in the context of the single market and that we must prepare for enlargement of the euro zone,
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 26 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas labour, knowledge and innovations have a tendency to migrate to certain regions, and EU financial solidarity mechanisms need to be further developed focusing, in particular, on research and development and education and aiming at territorial, economic and social cohesion,
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas a fair balance between investments in sustainable growth and the prevention of excessive deficits over the economic cycle, in line with Union-level commitments and guidelines, need to be persued and taken decisions should not affect badly the situation of future generations,
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 66 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas comprehensive secondary legislation needs to be established and implemented in order to attain the Union objectives in this area; whereas enhanced economic governance for the Union based on the provisions of the TFEU is essential, the Union method should be used to its full extent and the key role of the Commission should be respected in order to promote mutually reinforcing polices,
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 146 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Annex 1 – heading 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
– Establish a clear harmonised framework to measure and monitor debt dynamics, including implicit and contingent liabilities, such as public guarantees in public-private-partnership investments and to better monitor the interplay between debt, deficit and growth,
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 157 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Annex 1 – heading 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 5 a (new)
– Ask Member States to introduce into national laws legally binding rules with regards to the levl of public debt or deficit in order to ensure medium and long term sustainability of public finances,
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 163 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Annex 1 – heading 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 7
– Establish pre-specified and pre-emptive incentives to be decided independently from the Council by the Commission or semi-automatic sanctions, , that are fair and equal for all Member States, in order to facilitate early warning steps and apply them in a progressive way,
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 187 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Annex 1 – heading 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– Increase the importance of the annual euro area surveillance reports based on quarterly thematic multi-country reports focusing ion particularone site on potential spill- over effects from global economic developments and from policies and circumstances having a particular impact on certain Member States in the euro area and on the other site on the influence that economic decisions taken by the Eurogrupy may have on the whole European Union,
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Annex 1 – heading 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 4
– Increase transparency and accountability of the decision-making of the Euro Group by establishing a regular dialogue with the President of Euro Group within the Committee competent in Parliament, and by publishing speedily the decisions taken by the Euro Group on their webpage; ensure that non eurozone EU Members, at least those with an obligation to adopt the common currency, have an access to the debate within the Euro Group.
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 208 #

2010/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Annex 1 – heading 4 – indent 1 a (new)
– Examine the possibility of non euro Member States to join the European stabilisation mechanism on a case-by-case basis and after fulfilling certain conditions.
2010/09/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 32 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that there are still issues to bealls on the Commission to provide further clarifiedcations regarding the scope of application of the directive; considers that a directive clearly defining the concepts, in particular as regards the notion of "ecommercial servicnomic activities", "services of general economic interest" and "social services of general interest" is more necessary than ever in order to precisely delineate the Service Directive's scope of application and the law applicable to services not subject to the directive, with particular regard to authorisation schem, as well as regarding the application of the directive to authorisation schemes in the area of social services of general interest;
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the points of single contact should be used as information centres for issues related to the directive, in particular; they could additionally provide information regarding applicable labour law and workers' rights in force under the directive;
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2010/2053(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Invites the Employment Committee referred to in Article 150 TFEU to issue regular reports on theCommission to closely monitor the application of the Directive in all Member States and to issue regular implementation reports. These reports should take into effects of the directive's implementation on employment, from both a quantitative and a qualitative point of viewreal medium- and long term effects of the Directive on employment in the EU.
2010/09/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2010/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Draws attention to the undesirable effects – in terms of deteriorating employment, human capital and purchasing power – of prematurely withdrawing support measures; points out, however, that applying fiscal stimulus measures for too long leads to excessive debt and can mean a reduction in potential economic growth;
2010/03/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 85 #

2010/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points to the special importance of measures to promote employment and long-term investments aimed at increasing the potential for economic growth and bolstering the competitiveness of the European economy;
2010/03/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 86 #

2010/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Emphasises that, in view of the current demographic challenges the EU is facing, anti-crisis measures should not have long-term effects on public finances, the cost of which would have to be met by future generations;
2010/03/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 157 #

2010/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Highlights the need for the sustainability of public finances in EU Member States to be constantly monitored in order to assess the extent of long-term challenges; also highlights the need for the regular publication of information on open public-sector liabilities and the liabilities of social systems e.g. pensions;
2010/03/09
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #

2010/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. calls for further investigation of increased opportunities for smaller firms in order to improve competitiveness on the market; in this respect welcomes the Commission's intention to address the issue of contractual clauses that are informally referred to as "Big Four only clauses" and to create instead European quality certification for audit firms which would formally recognise their aptitude to perform audits of large listed companies,
2011/04/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 24 #

2010/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the provision of increased opportunities for smaller firms by preventing internal audit services being carried out by the same company as the external audit;Does not believe that the creation of "pure audit firms" is a right approach to ensure independence of audit companies; however notes that areas of audit services which are deemed to incur a conflict of interest should be carried out by different companies,; including evalu this respect calls on the Commission to ensure a proper implementations of complex structured productthe Commission Recommendation of 16 May 2002 on Statutory Auditors' Independence in the EU: A Set of Fundamental Principles;
2011/04/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 48 #

2010/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes companies should conduct a compulsory open tthat external auditors should be appointed by the gendering process for statutory appointments of external auditors every eight years, on a renewable basis; notes that for SIFIs this should be reduced to every four yearal meeting of shareholders or audit committees, however a compulsory open tendering process should be considered in case of SIFIs;
2011/04/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 8 #

2010/0821(NLE)

Draft decision
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) At its meeting on 16 December 2010 the European Council also agreed that Member States whose currency is not the euro may decide to participate in operations conducted by the mechanism on an ad hoc basis.
2011/02/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 28 #

2010/0821(NLE)

Draft decision
Article 1
The following paragraph shall be added to Article 136 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: "3. The Member States whose currency is the euro may establish a stability mechanism to be activated if indispensable to safeguard the stability of the euro area as a whole. Member States whose currency is not the euro may decide to participate in the mechanism. The granting of any required financial assistance under the mechanism will be made subject to strict conditionality.".
2011/02/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 47 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
2. There is a need to build upon the experience gained during the first decade of functioning of the economic and monetary union regarding macroeconomic imbalances.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘imbalances’ means macroeconomic developments which are adversely affecting, or have the potential to adversely to affect, the proper functioning of the economy or the competitiveness of a Member State or of economic and monetary union, or of the Union as a whole.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, after consultation with Member States and the European Parliament, establish an indicative scoreboard as a tool to facilitate early identification and monitoring of imbalances.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The scoreboard shall be made up of an array of macroeconomic and macrofinancial indicators fo, which are adequate to measure the economic equilibrium and competitiveness of the Member States in comparison to other Member States. The Commission may set indicative lower or upper thresholds for these indicators to serve as alert levels. The thresholds applicable to Member States whose currency is the euro may be different from those applicable to the other Member States.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The list of indicators to be included in the scoreboard and the thresholds should allow the detection of internal and external macroeconomic imbalances.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2010/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The release of the updated scoreboard shall be accompanied by a Commission report containing an economic and financial assessment putting the movement of the indicators into perspective, drawing if necessary on any other economic and financial or structural indicator relevant to detection of imbalances. The report shall also indicate whether the crossing of lower or upper thresholds in one or more Member States signifies the possible emergence of imbalances.
2011/02/14
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point e
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 7
7. In the case of Member States where the excess of the deficit or the breach of the requirements of the debt criterion according to Article 126 (2) (b) of the Treaty reflects the implementation of a pension reform introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fully funded pillar, the Commission and the Council shall also consider the cost of the reform to the publicly managed pillar when assessing developments in EDP deficit and debt figures. In cases where the debt ratio exceeds the reference value, the full cost of the reform shall be considered only if the deficit remains close to the reference value. For that purpose, for a period of five years starting from the date of entry into force of such a reform, consideration shall be given to its net cost as reflected in deficit and debt developments on the basis of a linear degressive scale. Additionally, irrespective of the date of entry into force of the reform, its net cost as reflected in debt developments shall be given consideration for a transitional period of five years from [date of entry into force of this Regulation, to be inserted] on the basis of the same linear degressive scale. The net cost as thus calculated shall be taken into account also for the decision of the Council under Article 126(12) of the Treaty on the abrogation of some or all of its decisions under paragraphs 6 to 9 and 11 of Article 126 of the Treaty, if the deficit has declined substantially and continuously and has reached a level that comes close to the reference value and, in case of non- fulfilment of the requirements of the debt criterion, the debt has been put on a declining path. Moreover, equal consideration shall be given to the reduction in this net cost resulting from the partial or total reversal of an above mentioned pension reform.
2011/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2010/0276(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point e
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 7
7. In the case of Member States where the excess of the deficit or the breach of the requirements of the debt criterion according to Article 126 (2) (b) of the Treaty reflects the implementation of a pension reform introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fully funded pillar, the Commission and the Council shall also consider the cost of the reform to the publicly managed pillar when assessing developments in EDP deficit and debt figures. In cases where the debt ratio exceeds the reference value, the cost of the reform shall be considered only if the deficit remains close to the reference value. For that purpose, for a period of five years starting from the date of entry into force of such a reform, consideration shall be given to itsthe net cost as reflected in deficit and debt developments on the basis of a linear degressive scale. Additionally, irrespective of the date of entry into force of the reform, its net cost as reflected in debt developments shall be given consideration for a transitional period of five years from [date of entry into force of this Regulation, to be inserted] on the basis of the same linear degressive scaleof the pension reform as reflected in deficit and debt developments irrespective of the date of entry into force of the reform. Theis net cost as thus calculated shall be taken into account also for the decision of the Council under Article 126(12) of the Treaty on the abrogation of some or all of its decisions under paragraphs 6 to 9 and 11 of Article 126 of the Treaty, if the deficit has declined substantially and continuously and has reached a level that comes somewhat above the level that can be considered as close to the reference value and, in case of non-fulfilment of the requirements of the debt criterion, the debt has been put on a declining path. Moreover, equal consideration shall be given to the reduction in this net cost resulting from the partial or total reversal of an above mentioned pension reform.
2011/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 82 #

2010/0220(NLE)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8a Review On the basis of the information provided by the Member States in accordance with Article 7, the Commission may, if necessary, submit to the Council a proposal for the amendment of this Regulation concerning its prolonged application to aid to cover exceptional costs.
2010/10/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Activities dependent on the passing of the seasons are typically to be found in sectors such as agriculture and horticulture, during the planting or harvesting period, or tourism, during the holiday period. Member States are free to designate other sectors which are subject to seasonality.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Third-country national seasonal workers should be granted equal treatment in respectOn the basis of those branches of social security listedreferred to in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 883/04 on the coordination of social security systemf the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, Member States shall define which of these benefits cover seasonal workers. This Directive should not confer more rights than those already provided in existing EU legislation in the field of social security for third-country nationals who have cross-border interests between Member States. Furthermore, this Directive should not grant rights in relation to situations which lie outside the scope of that EU legislation such as, for example, to family members residing in a third country. This is without prejudice to the non discriminatory application by Member States of national legislation providing for de minimis rules on contributions to pension systems.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14
Member States shall require employers of seasonal workers to provide evidence that the seasonal worker will benefit from accommodation that ensures an adequate standard of living. If seasonal workers are required to pay rent for such accommodation, its cost shall not be excessive in relation to their remunerationhas accommodation for the duration of the seasonal work.
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 140 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 1 a (new)
1a. social security benefits designated by Member States on the basis of the branches of social security as defined in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004;
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 150 #

2010/0210(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – point 2 – point b
(b) provisions in national laws regarding the branches of social security as defined in Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 883/04;deleted
2011/09/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) Equal treatment should be granted under national law in respect of those branches of social security defined in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 883/04 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems. Since this Directive is without prejudice to provisions included in bilateral agreements, the social security rights enjoyed by third country national intra-corporate transferees on the basis of a bilateral agreement concluded between the Member State to which the person has been admitted and his or her country of origin could be strengthened compared to the social security rights which would be granted to the transferee under national law. This Directive should not confer more rights than those already provided for in existing Union legislation in the field of social security for third-country nationals who have cross-border interests between Member States. The provisions of this Directive should not apply to situations where a posted worker is covered by the social security legislation of a third country or pays contributions in a third country.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment Amendment148 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authorities of the Member State concerned shall adopt a decision on the application for admission to a Member State as an intra-corporate transferee or for revision of the additional document provided for in Article 11(4) and notify the applicant in writing, in accordance with the notification procedures laid down in the national law of the Member State concerned, within 30 days of the complete application being lodged. In exceptional cases involving complex applications including applications concerning host entities in several Member States, the deadline may be extended for a maximum of a further 630 days.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point b
(b) ‘intra-corporate transfer’ means the temporary secondment of a third-country national from an undertaking established outside the territory of a Member State and to which the third-country national is bound by a work contract or other form of employment, to an entity belonging to the undertaking or to the same group of undertakings which is established inside this territory;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point e
(e) ‘manager’ means any person working in a senior position, who principally directs the management of the host entity, as well as any person managing teams and/or projects essential to the host entity, receiving general supervision or direction principally from the board of directors or stockholders of the business or equivalent; this position includes: directing the host entity or a department or sub-division of the host entity, supervising and controlling the work of other supervisory, professional or managerial employees, having the authority personally to hire and dismiss or recommend hiring, dismissing or other personnel actions;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 99 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point f
(f) ‘specialist’ means any person possessing uncommon knowledge essential and specific to the host entity, taking account not only of knowledge specific to the host entity, but also of whether the person has a high level of qualification referring to a type of work or trade requiring specific technical knowledge;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) provide evidence of employment within the same group of undertakings, for at least 12 monthssix months in the case of managers and specialists and three months in the case of trainees, immediately preceding the date of the intra-corporate transfer, if required by national legislation, and that he or she will be able to transfer back to an entity belonging to that group of undertakings and established in a third country at the end of the assignment;
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2010/0209(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – point 2 – point c
(c) without prejudice to existing bilateral agreements, provisions in national law regarding the branches of social security defined in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 883/04. In the event of mobility between Member States and without prejudice to existing bilateral agreements, Council Regulation (EC) No 859/2003 shall apply accordingly;. This provision shall not apply to situations where a posted worker is covered by the social security legislation of a third country or pays contributions in a third country.
2011/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2009/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. WelcomNotes the adoption of the Commission proposal on the future EU2020 strategy; stresses the long-term nature of this strategy that aims to create framework conditions for stable growth and jobs creation in Europe, and agrees with the priorities identified;
2010/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 61 #

2009/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that infrastructural deficiencies still vary considerably across Europe, blocking its growth potential and the smooth functioning of the Internal Market; believes that a true level playing field in transport, energy, telecommunications and IT infrastructure needs to be created, should be included in the strategy and continue to be a vital part of the cohesion policy;
2010/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 85 #

2009/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Points out that a stronger territorial dimension of the strategy, considering the specificities and different development levels of the European regions, with the direct involvement of regional and local authorities in the planning and implementation of the relevant programmes, will lead to a greater sense of ownership of its goals at all levels and ensure a better awareness of objectives and outputs on the ground;
2010/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 96 #

2009/2235(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Recommends the adoption of a simplified approach to the use of the Structural Funds in the future regulatory framework; highlights that the harmonisation of rules and procedures may lead to simplified delivery systems and encourage participation by potential beneficiaries in EU co-funded programmes; recommends sticking to existing financing mechanisms such as Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund, which have well- well-established and operational delivery mechanisms;
2010/03/29
Committee: REGI
Amendment 17 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas Article 14 of the TFEU and Protocol 26 thereto explicitly address services of general interest (SGI) which include social services of general interest (SSGI), both economic and non- economic; and whereas it is confirmed that national, regional and local authorities have the essential role and wide discretion in providing, commissioning and organising services of general economic interest (SGEI), and that the Treaties do not affect the competence of Member States to provide, commission and organise non-economic services of general interest (SGNEI),
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 29 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that SSGI and their users have a number of special characteristics in addition to the common characteristics of SGI. SSGI encompass, in addition to health services, both statutory and complementary universally available services, provided directly to the person, that play a preventative and social cohesion and inclupeople in need, that prevent from social exclusion, play social cohesion role and make tangible fundamental social rights;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 40 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that access to SSGI must be universal and independent of wealth or income, and are not only for vulnerable users;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Endorses the recommendation in the Monti report that broadband internet and banking services be new universal services, which should be acknowledged in European legislation;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 58 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the fact that SSGI make a major economic contribution in terms of jobs, economic activity and purchasing power – the Commission's second Biennial Report indicating that the health and social services sector accounts for 5% of economic output and employs 21.4 million people – and that SMEs in particular are reliant on high quality SSGI;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that experience demonstrates that the profit maximisation objective of commercial providers of SSGI conflicts with the principles and objectives of SSGI;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 96 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that national and local authorities engaged in providing or mandating SSGI need a clear legal basis for their services and expenditures, and that while the information and clarification service developed by the Commission is essential, it is insufficient and does not protect SSGI providers from legal challenge however, there is still lack of legal certainty;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that it is neither efficient nor democratically acceptable that the ECJ is expected to continue to adjudicate on matters which should be clarified in legislation;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that, in order to maintain the delivery of quality SSGI, the Member States need new income streams, such as a financial transaction tax adjusted to a specific character of these services;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Believes there is a broad European consensus that SSGI are essential to the well-being of our peoples and an efficient economy but that there is no agreement within or between the Commission and the Council on the implementation of practical measures to overcome identified obstacles to the delivery and development of SSGI;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 148 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the fact that Member States and local authorities must be freehave a free choice within market economy to decide how SSGI are funded and delivered, whether directly or otherwise, using all available instruments so as to ensure that the Union's social objectives are not weakened by single market rulesmet, while at the same time supporting an environment that promotes quality, accessibility and efficiency in the delivery of the services;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 173 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the 2005 Monti-Kroes response to the Altmark case to be broadenfurther developed so as to simplify the rules, improve flexibility in their application, and expand the derogations. The de minimis threshold should be raised to at least EUR 500 000 over a three-year cycle;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for reformclarification of the criteria for classifying economic and non-economic SSGI in the framework of current EU legislation;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 198 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission formally to recognise other modalities for the selection of providers, such as ‘in-house’ and ‘service concession’ methods, and explicitly to accord equal value to all options for the contracting and financing of SSGI; calls for the expansion of the ‘in- house’ method to include service providers who meet specific general interest criteria;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 233 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Proposes the establishment of a high- level multi-stakeholder taskforce – initially with a two-year mandate – that is open, flexible and transparent, to pursue implementation of the policy initiatives identified in this report and in the 3rd Forum recommendations, the Commission's second Biennial Report and the SPC reports, as well as any other relevant proposals; to initiate a full review of all rules, particularly state-aid and procurement rules, which impact on SSGI and to evaluate how they need to be redesigned so as to respect and support Member States' responsibilities in the definition and delivery of SSGI, taking account of the current Commission review of rules;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Considers that, as part of its mandate, the proposed taskforce would also consider innovations such as a European resource centre for SSGI, a Member State register of SSGI, a pilot scheme on elder care, and action programmes based on the European Voluntary Quality Framework (VQF);deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 249 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Urges that the taskforce be chaired by the Commission's DG Social Affairs; that its membership include DG Competition, DG Single Market, DG Environment and DG Sanco, the European Social Affairs Council (EPSCO), the social partners and civil society organisations active in SSGI; that, in view of their democratic mandate, both Parliament and the Committee of the Regions must be centrally involved; and that social economy enterprises and stakeholders including voluntary associations, as well as local authorities, must be represented;deleted
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Urges that Member States use the VQF to draw up quality accreditationentrusting and monitoring systems, and that implementafunctioning of the VQF be evaluated with reference to the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Protocol 26 TFEU;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Emphasises that decent, stable working conditions and quality training are essential for the delivery of quality social services; underlines also a need of hiring a high class specialists;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 284 #

2009/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Proposes that the absence of reference in the VQF to funding and service provider status be remediedfurther improvement of the VQF;
2011/03/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #

2009/2090(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new) (before subheading "Exit strategy")
10a. Is of the opinion that the ECB could have used some other policy actions in order to stabilise the economic situation in the new Member States; therefore invites the ECB to consider two instruments that could help to stabilise the economy during the crisis in those countries, namely temporary reciprocal currency arrangements (swap lines) and wider collateral; calls on the ECB to introduce swap lines with central banks of the new Member States to provide them with euro liquidity against their own currencies, and temporarily to accept as eligible securities for its repurchase transactions with counterparties not only government bonds issued in euro, but also those issued in the domestic currencies of the newer Member States; opines that this would be an extension of the ECB’s recent decision to accept low-quality securities as collateral; is of the opinion that the ECB should not take exchange- rate risks and should therefore apply appropriate haircuts to non-euro sovereign bonds to cover that risk; considers that this initiative would eliminate the current strong incentive for banks in the euro area not to hold in their portfolios government bonds denominated in the domestic currencies of the newer Member States;
2009/12/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 44 #

2009/2090(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. States that Member States should continue with their current fiscal stimulus measures to protect jobs, encourage investment and stimulate growth; points out, however, that applying fiscal stimulus measures for too long leads to excessive debt and can mean a reduction in potential economic growth and, in the worst case, a recession;
2009/12/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 161 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to ensure efficient and effective supervision and a balanced consideration of the positions of the competent authorities in different Member States, the Authority should be able to settle disagreements between those competent authorities with binding effect, including within colleges of supervisors. A conciliation phase should be provided for, during which the competent authorities may reach an agreement. The Authority's competence should cover disagreements on procedural obligations in the cooperation process as well as on the intin that respect should be specified in the sectoral legislation referpretation and application of Community law in supervisory decisionsd to in Article 1(2). Existing conciliation mechanisms provided for in sectoral legislation have to be respected. In the event of inaction by the national supervisory authorities concerned, the Authority should be empowered to adopt, as a last resort, decisions directly addressed to financial market participants in areas of Community law directly applicable to them.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 274 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Within three months of receipt of the draft standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse the draft standards. The Commission may extend that period by one month. The Commission may endorse the draft standards only in part or with amendments where the Community interest so requires.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 283 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Where the Commission does not endorse the standards or endorses them in part or with amendments, it shall inform the Authority of its reasons. it shall propose reasoned modifications and send the draft standards back to the Authority. The Authority may amend the draft standards on the basis of the Commission’s proposed modifications and resubmit the draft standards to the Commission for endorsement.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 286 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
Within one month of receipt of the amended standards, the Commission shall endorse submitted standards with the amendments suggested by the Authority or reject the standards and inform the European Parliament and the Council of its decision, stating the reasons.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 364 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the powers laid down in Article 9, where a competent authority disagrees on the procedure or content of an action or inaction by another competent authority in areas where thecases specified in legislation referred to in Article 1(2) requires cooperation, coordination or joint decision making by competent authorities from more than one Member State, the Authority, at the request of one or more of the competent authorities concerned, may assist the authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraph 2.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 365 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the powers laid down in Article 9, where a competent authority disagrees on the procedure or content of an action or inaction by another competent authority in areas whereindicated in the legislation referred to in Article 1(2) requires cooperation, coordination or joint decision making by competent authorities from more than one Member State, the Authority, at the request of one or more of the competent authorities concerned, may assist the authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraph 2.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 498 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the Authority maintains its decision, the Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 20516 of the Treaty on European Union, shall, within two months, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 501 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
Where the Council decides to maintain the Authority's decision, or where it does not take a decision within two months, the suspension of that decision shall be immediately terminated.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 503 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
Where the Council does not take a decision within two months, the decision shall be terminated.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 513 #

2009/0144(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within ten working days, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 165 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In order to ensure efficient and effective supervision and a balanced consideration of the positions of the national supervisory authorities in different Member States, the Authority should be able to settle disagreements between those authorities with binding effect, including within colleges of supervisors. A conciliation phase should be provided for, during which the national supervisory authorities may reach an agreement. The Authority's competence should cover disagreements on procedural obligations in the cooperation process as well as on the intin that respect should be specified in the sectoral legislation referpretation and application of Community law in supervisory decisionsd to in Article 1(2). Existing conciliation mechanisms provided for in sectoral legislation have to be respected. In the event of inaction by the national supervisory authorities concerned, the Authority should be empowered to adopt, as a last resort, decisions directly addressed to financial institutions in areas of CommunityUnion law directly applicable to them.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 247 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Within three months of receipt of the draft standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse the draft standards. The Commission may extend that period by one month. The Commission may endorse the draft standards only in part or with amendments where the Community interest so requires.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 249 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Where the Commission does not endorse the standards or endorses them in part or with amendments, it shall inform the Authority of its reasons, it shall propose justified amendments and send the draft standards back to the Authority. The Authority may amend the draft standards on the basis of the Commission’s proposed amendments and may resubmit the draft standards to the Commission for endorsement.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 251 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
Within one month of receipt of the amended standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse or reject them and shall inform the European Parliament and the Council of its decision, stating the reason.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 465 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the Authority maintains its decision, the Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within two months, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 466 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
Where the Council decides to maintain the Authority's decision, or where it does not take a decision within two months, the suspension of that decision shall be immediately terminated.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 468 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
Where the Council does not take a decision within two months, the decision shall be terminated.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 473 #

2009/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 20516 of the Treaty on European Union, shall, within ten working days, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 217 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to ensure efficient and effective supervision and a balanced consideration of the positions of the competent authorities in different Member States, the Authority should be able to settle disagreements between those competent authorities with binding effect, including within colleges of supervisors. A conciliation phase should be provided for, during which the competent authorities may reach an agreement. The Authority’s competence should cover disagreements on procedural obligations in the cooperation process as well as on the intin that respect should be specified in the sectoral legislation referpretation and application of Community law in supervisory decisionsd to in Article 1(2). Existing conciliation mechanisms provided for in sectoral legislation have to be respected. In the event of inaction by the national supervisory authorities concerned, the Authority should be empowered to adopt, as a last resort, decisions directly addressed to financial institutions in areas of Community law directly applicable to them.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 368 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Within three months of receipt of the draft standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse the draft standards. The Commission may extend that period by one month. The Commission may endorse the draft standards only in part or with amendments where the Community interest so requires.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 377 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Where the Commission does not endorse the standards or endorses them in part or with amendments, it shall inform the Authority of its reasonsit shall propose reasoned modifications and send the draft standards back to the Authority. The Authority may amend the draft standards on the basis of the Commission’s proposed modifications and resubmit the draft standards to the Commission for endorsement.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 380 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
Within one month of receipt of the amended standards, the Commission shall endorse submitted standards with the amendments suggested by the Authority or reject the standards and inform the European Parliament and the Council of its decision stating the reasons.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 633 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the Authority maintains its decision, the Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within two months, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 636 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
Where the Council decides to maintain the Authority's decision, or where it does not take a decision within two months, the suspension of that decision shall be immediately terminated.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 638 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
Where the Council does not take a decision within two months, the decision shall be terminated .
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 644 #

2009/0142(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within ten working days, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 92 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The ESRB should, where appropriate, issue warnings and recommendations of a general nature concerning the Community as a whole, individual Member States or groups of Member States, with a specified timeline for the relevant policy response. Where such warnings or recommendations are addressed to individual or a group of Member States, the ESRB should also propose appropriate support measures that could, for example, be provided by the European System of Central Banks.
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 127 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) propose appropriate support measures to reinforce suggested remedial action;
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 169 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) five other members of the General Board who are also members of the General Council of the ECB, proportionally representing euro and non- euro area Member States. They shall be elected by and from among the Members of the General Board who are also members of the General Council of the ECB for a period of two years.;
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 212 #

2009/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. When significant risks to the achievement of the objective in aArticle 3(1) are identified, the ESRB shall provide warnings and, where appropriate, issue recommendations for remedial action including, where it deems necessary, for legislative initiatives and suggest support measures that are appropriate for a particular case.
2010/03/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) To strengthen the solidarity between Member States in the case of a CommunityUnion Emergency and in particular to support Member States which are exposed to less favourable geographical or geological conditions, Member States should devise specific measures to exercise solidarity, as provided for in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, including measures such as commercial agreements between natural gas undertakings, compensation mechanisms, increased gas exports or increased releases from storages. Solidarity measures may be particularly appropriate between Member States for which the Commission recommends the establishment of joint preventive actions plans or emergency plans at regional level.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1
This Regulation establishes measures aimed at safeguarding the security of gas supply so as to ensure the proper and continuous functioning of the internal market for gas, and setting up exceptional measures to be implemented where the market cannot deliver the required gas supply, by providing for a clear definition and attribution of responsibilities and for a coordination of the response at the level of the Member States and the CommunityUnion regarding both preventive action and the reaction to concrete disruptions of supply in a spirit of solidarity between the Member States.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 30 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The Preventive Action Plan shall take into account cost efficiency, economic effectiveness, effects on the functioning of the internal energy market and environmental impact.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point 3
(3) Emergency level (Emergency): when an exceptionally high demand occurs or when there is a disruption of the supply through or from the largest infrastructure or source andor there is a credible risk that the supply standard to the protected customers can no longer be met with market based instruments alone.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 63 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall verify within one weekthree days whether the declaration of an Emergency is justifiedfulfils the criteria indicated in paragraph 2 and whether it does not impose an undue burden on the natural gas undertakings and on the functioning of the internal market. The Commission may, in particular, ask the Competent Authority to modify measures imposing an undue burden on natural gas undertakings and to lift its declaration of Emergency if the Commission considers it not or no longer justified.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 69 #

2009/0108(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Where the Commission considers that in the case of a Union Emergency, the actions taken by the Competent Authority or natural gas undertakings are insufficient , the Commission may implement directly the measures listed in Annexes II and III in order to restore the gas supply to the affected markets.
2010/01/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 295 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) This Directive should provide for a single AIFM for each AIF managed within the scope of the Directive, which should be responsible for the compliance with the requirements of this Directive.
2010/02/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 368 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) institutions which are covered by Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 3 June 2003 on the activities and supervisionnational, regional and local governments and bodies ofr institutions for occupational retirement provisionwhich manage funds supporting social security and pension systems;
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 449 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point b
(b) ‘manager of alternative investment funds or AIFM means any legal or natural person whose regular business is to manage one or several AIFperson that manages one or several AIF and is responsible for the compliance with the requirements of this Directive and which, depending on the legal form of the AIF, can be either the AIF itself or an external entity;
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 691 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a.The above paragraphs shall not apply to AIFM only managing AIF: (a) which are not leveraged; (b) which have no redemption rights exercisable during a period of five years following the date of constitution of each AIF; (c) which have fixed capital commitments; (d) where fees are based on capital commitments; (e) where investors have the right to change the AIFM; and (f) where specific provisions are included in the contractual agreement regarding the winding-up of an AIFM to protect investors during a transition.
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 703 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. AIFM shall ensure that, for each AIF that it manages, a valuator is appointed which is independent of the AIFM to establish the value of assets acquired byppropriate and consistent procedures are established so that the proper valuation of the assets of the AIF and the value of the shares andor units of the AIF can be performed.
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 720 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The valuator shall ensure that the assets, shares and units are valued at least once a year, and each time shares or units of the AIF are issued or redeemed if this is more frequent.deleted
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 738 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. AIFM shall ensure that the valuator has appropriate and consistent procedures to value the assets of the AIF in accordance with existing applicable valuation standards and rules, in order to reflect the net asset value of the shares or units of the AIF.deleted
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 756 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. The rules applicable to the valuation of assets and the calculation of the net asset value per unit or share of the AIF shall be laid down in the law of the country where the AIF is domiciled or in the AIF rules or instruments of incorporation.deleted
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 770 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures further specifying the criteria under which a valuator can be considered independent in the meaning of paragraph 1. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3).deleted
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 868 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. The depositary shall be: (a) a credit institution having its registered office in the Community and be authorised in accordance with Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions (recast).;
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 873 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) an investment firm authorised in accordance with Directive 2004/39/EC to also provide the ancillary service of safe- keeping and administration of financial instruments for the account of clients in accordance with Section B(1) of Annex I to that Directive, having its registered office in the Union;
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 885 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a f (new)
(af) a legal person which carries out depository functions as part of professional or business activities in respect of which it is subject to prudential regulation and ongoing supervision and which can provide sufficient financial and professional guarantees to be able to effectively perform the relevant depository functions and meet the commitments inherent to those functions.
2010/02/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1031 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. An AIFM shall, for each of the AIF it manages, make available an annual report for each financial year. The annual report shall be made available to investors and competent authorities no later than four months following the end of the financial year or, in circumstances where information is required from third parties, such as the audit of any underlying investments of the AIF, no later than six months following the end of the financial year.
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1042 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The accounting information given in the annual report shall be prepared in accordance with the accounting standards or principles required by the applicable AIF rules or instruments of incorporation or formation and audited by one or more persons empowered by law to audit accounts in accordance with Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC. The auditor's report, including any qualifications, shall be reproduced in full in the annual report.
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1045 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
4. The Commission shall adopt implementing measuredelegated acts further specifying the content and format of the annual report. These measuresose acts shall be appropriate and proportionate and shall be adapted to the type of AIFM to which they apply and the AIF to which the report relates, taking account of the different size, resources, complexity, nature, investments, investment strategies and techniques, structures and investors of different types of AIFM and the AIF that they manage.
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1056 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. AIFM shall ensure that, insofar as applicable to the AIF concerned, AIF investors receive the following information before they invest in the AIF, as well as any changes thereof:
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1065 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a description of the investment strategy and objectives of the AIF, all the types of assets which the AIF can invest in and of the techniques it may employ and of all associated risks, any applicable investment restrictions, the circumstances in which the AIF may use leverage, the types and sources of leverage permitted and the associated risks and of any restrictions to the use of leverage;
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1072 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the identity of the AIF's, if applicable, of the AIF's current or proposed depositary, valuator, auditor and any other current or proposed critical or important service providers and a description of their duties and the investors' rights should any failure arise;
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1075 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) a description of any critical or important delegated management or depositary function and the identity of the third party to whom the function has been delegated;
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1081 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) where the AIF has exercisable redemption rights, a description of the AIF's liquidity risk management, including the redemption rights both in normal and exceptional circumstances, existing redemption arrangements with investors, and how the AIFM ensures a fair treatment of investors;
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1084 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) a description of all fees, charges and expenses and of the maximum amounts thereof which are directly or indirectly borne by investors;
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1090 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) whenever an investor obtains a preferential treatment or the right to obtain preferential treatment, the identity of the investor and a description of that preferential treatment, and whether there is any connection between the AIFM and that investor;
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1097 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) the latest annual report if there is such a report in relation to the AIF.
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1128 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. The Commission shall adopt implementing measuredelegated acts further specifying the disclosure obligations of AIFM and the frequency of the disclosure referred to in paragraph 2.These measureacts shall be adapted to the type of AIFM to which they apply and be proportionate, taking account, inter alia, of the different size, resources, complexity, nature, investments, investment strategies and techniques, structures and investors of different types of AIFM.
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1138 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
It shall provide aggregated information on the main instruments in which it is trading, markets of which it is a member or where it actively trades, and on the principal trading exposures and most important resulting concentrations of each of the AIF it manages.
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1139 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. For each AIF an AIFM manages, it and in respect of which redemption rights are exercisable, the AIFM shall periodically report the following to the competent authorities of its home Member State:
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1166 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) an annual report of each AIF managed by the AIFM for each financial year, within four months from the end of the periods to which it relates or, in circumstances where information is required from third parties (such as the audit of any underlying investments of the AIF), no later than six months from the end of the financial year;
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1176 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
4. The Commission shall adopt implementing measuresdelegated acts in accordance with Articles 49a, 49b and 49c further specifying the reporting obligations referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 and their frequency. Such acts shall be appropriate and proportionate and adapted to the type of AIFM and AIF to which they apply, taking account, interalia, of the different size, resources, complexity, nature, investments, investment strategies and techniques, structures and investors of different types of AIFM.
2010/02/16
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1287 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 26
Article 26 Scope 1. This section shall apply to the following: (a) AIFM managing one or more AIF which either individually or in aggregation acquires 30 % or more of the voting rights of an issuer or of a non- listed company domiciled in the Community, as appropriate; (b) AIFM having concluded an agreement with one or more other AIFM which would allow the AIF managed by these AIFM to acquire 30 % or more of the voting rights of the issuer or the non- listed company, as appropriate. 2. This section shall not apply where the issuer or the non-listed company concerned are small and medium enterprises that employ fewer than 250 persons, have an annual turnover not exceeding 50 million euro and/or an annual balance sheet not exceeding 43 million euro.deleted
2010/03/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1311 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 27
Article 27 Notification of the acquisition of controlling influence in non-listed companies 1. Member States shall ensure that when an AIFM is in a position to exercise 30 % or more of the voting rights of a non- listed company, such AIFM notifies the non-listed company and all other share- holders the information provided in paragraph 2. This notification shall be made, as soon as possible, but not later than four trading days the first of which being the day on which the AIFM has reached the position of being able to exercise 30% of the voting rights. 2. The notification required under paragraph 1 shall contain the following information: (a) the resulting situation in terms of voting rights; (b) the conditions under which the 30% threshold has been reached, including information about the identity of the different shareholders involved; (c) the date on which the threshold was reached or exceeded.deleted
2010/03/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1335 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 28
Article 28 Disclosure in case of acquisition of controlling influence in issuers or non- listed companies 1. States shall ensure that where an AIFM acquires 30 % or more of the voting rights of an issuer or a non-listed company, that AIFM makes the information set out in the second and third subparagraphs available to the issuer, the non-listed company, their respective shareholders and representatives of employees or, where there are no such representatives, to the employees themselves. With regard to issuers, deleted In addition to Article 27, Member the policy for preventing and the policy for external and internal (d) the identity of the AIFM which either individually or in agreement with other AIFM shall make available the following to the issuer concerned, its shareholders and representatives of employees: (a) the information referred to in Article 6(3) of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids1; (b) managing conflicts of interests, in particular between the AIFM and the issuer; (c) communication of the issuer in particular as regards employees. With regard to non-listed companies, the AIFM shall make available the following to the non-listed company concerned, its shareholders and representatives of employees: 2. implementing measures determining: Those measures, designed to amenve reached the 30 % threshold; (e) the development plan for the non-listed company; (f) the policy for preventing and managing conflicts of interests, in particular between the AIFM and the non-listed company; (g) the policy for external and internal communication of the issuer or non-listed company, in particular as regards employees. The Commission shall adopt (a) the detailed ncon- 1 essential elemtents of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3)e information provided under paragraph 1; (b) the way the information shall be communicated. OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p.12.
2010/03/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1390 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 29
Article 29 Specific provisions regarding the annual report of AIF exercising controlling influence in issuers or non-listed companies Member States shall ensure that AIFM include in the annual report provided for in Article 19 for each AIF that they manage, the additional information provided in paragraph 2 of this Article. The AIF annual report shall include the following additional information for each issuer and non listed company in which the AIF has invested: (a) with regard to operational and financial developments, presentation of revenue and earnings by business segment, statement on the progress of company's activities and financial affairs, assessment of expected progress on activities and financial affairs, report on 1 OJ L 222, 14.8.1978, p. 11. 2 OJ L 26, 31.1.1977, p. 1. significant events in the financial year; (b) with regard to financial and other risks at least financial risks associated with capital structure; (c )with regard to employee matters, turnover, terminations, recruitment. (d) statement on significant divestment of assets. In addition, the AIF annual report shall, for each issuer in which it has acquired a controlling influence, contain the information provided for in point (f) of Article 46a(1) of Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54 (3) (g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies1 and an overview of the capital structure as referred to in points (a) and (d) of Article 10(1) of Directive 2004/25/EC. For each non-listed company in which it has acquired a controlling influence, the AIF report shall provide an overview of management arrangements and the information provided for in points (b), (c) and (e) to (h) of Article 3 of Second Council Directive 77/91/EEC of 13 December 1976 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent2. 3.The AIFM shall, for each AIF it manages and for which it is subject to this section, provide the information referred to in paragraph 2 above to all representatives of employees of the company concerned referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 26 within the period referred to in Article 19 (1) 4. implementing measures specifying the detailed content of the information to be provided under paragraphs 1 and 2. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3).deleted The Commission shall adopt
2010/03/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1427 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 30
Article 30 Specific provisions regarding companies whose shares are no longer admitted to trading on a regulated market Where, following an acquisition of 30 % or more of the voting rights of an issuer, the shares of that issuer are no longer admitted to trading on a regulated market, it shall nevertheless continue to comply with its obligations under Directive 2004/109/EC for two years from the date of withdrawal from the regulated market.deleted
2010/03/08
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1524 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36
Article 36 Delegation by the AIFM of administrative tasks to an entity established in a third country Member States shall only allow an AIFM to delegate administrative services to entities established in a third country, provided that all of the following conditions are met: (a) the requirements set out in Article 18 are fulfilled; (b) the entity is authorised to provide administration services or registered in the third country in which it is established and is subject to prudential supervision; (c) there is an appropriate co-operation agreement between the competent authority of the AIFM and the supervisory authority of the entity.deleted
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1534 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 37
Article 37 Valuator established in a third country 1. Member States shall only allow the appointment of a valuator established in a third country, provided that all of the following conditions are met: (a) the requirements set out in Article 16 are fulfilled; (b) the third country is the subject of a decision taken pursuant to paragraph 3 stating that the valuation standards and rules used by valuators established on its territory are equivalent to those applicable in the Community. 2. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures specifying the criteria for assessing the equivalence of the valuation standards and rules of third countries as referred to in paragraph (1) (b). Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3). 3. On the basis of the criteria referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 49(2), adopt implementing measures, stating that the valuation standards and rules of a third country legislation are equivalent to those applicable in the Community.deleted
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1544 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 38
Delegation of the depositary tasks in respect of AIF domiciled in third countries 1. 17(4), in respect of AIF domiciled in a third country Member States shall allow the depositary of that AIF appointed in accordance with Article 17 to delegate the performance of one or more of its functions to a sub-depositary domiciled in the same third country provided that the legislation of that third country is equivalent to the provisions of this Directive and is effectively enforced. The following conditions shall also be met: (a) decision taken pursuant to paragraph 4 stating sub-depositaries domiciled in that country are subject to effective prudential regulation and supervision which is equivalent to the provisions laid down in Community law; (b) Member State and the relevant authorities of the third country is sufficiently ensured; (c) decision taken pursuant to paragraph 4 stating that the standards to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing are equivalent to those laid down in Community law. 2. investors shall not be affected by the fact that it has delegated to a third country depositary the performance of all or a part of its tasks. 3. implementing measures specifying the criteria for assessing the equivalence of the prudential regulation, supervision and standards of third countries as referred to in paragraph 1. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3). 4. referred to in paragraph 3, the Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 49(2), adopt implementing measures, stating that prudential regulation, supervision and standards of a third country are equivalent to this Directive.Article 38 deleted By way of derogation from Article the third country is the subject of a co-operation between the home the third country is the subject of a The depositary's liability towards The Commission shall adopt On the basis of the criteria
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1559 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 1 –introductory part
1. Member States mayshall authorise, in accordance with this Directive, AIFM established in a third country to market units or shares of an AIF to professional investors in the CommunityUnion under the conditions of this Directive, provided that:
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1560 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the third country is the subject of a decision taken pursuant to paragraph 3 (a) stating that its legislation regarding prudential regulation and on-going supervision is equivalent to the provisions of this Directive and is effectively enforced;deleted
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1564 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the third country is the subject of a decision taken pursuant to paragraph 3 (b) stating that it grants Community AIFM effective market access comparable to that granted by the Community to AIFM from that third country;deleted
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1568 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a cooperation-agreement between the competent authorities of that Member Statethe AIFM is subject to authorisation or registration in the third country in which it is established and theits supervisor of the AIFM exists which ensures an efficient eis a signatory to the IOSCO Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Consultation and Cooperation and the Exchange oOf all iInformation that are relevant for monitoring the potential implications of the activities of the AIFM for the stability of systemically relevant financial institutions and the orderly functioning of markets in which the AIFM is active.or another appropriate cooperation-agreement between the competent authorities of that Member State and the supervisor of the AIFM exists;
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1572 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the third country has signed an agreement with the Member State in which it applies for authorisation which fully complies with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and ensures an effective exchange of information in tax matters.deleted
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1576 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The competent authorities of the Member State to which an application is made by an AIFM established in a third country to market units or shares of an AIF to professional investors in the Union under the conditions of this Directive shall grant authorisation only if they are satisfied that the AIFM will be able to fulfil the conditions of this Directive in relation to such marketing. The Member State which grants such authorisation to an AIFM established in a third country shall be deemed to be the home Member State of the AIFM for the purposes of this Directive. The authorisation shall be valid for all Member States in relation to marketing the units or shares in AIF and a third country AIFM which has been authorised by a Member State under this Article shall have the same rights and be subject to the same obligations under Chapters IV, V and VI.
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1577 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall adopt implementing measures aimed at establishing: (a) general equivalence criteria for the equivalence and effective enforcement of third country legislation on prudential regulation and on-going supervision, based on the requirements laid down in Chapters III, IV and V. (b) general criteria for assessing whether third countries grant Community AIFM effective market access comparable to that granted by the Community to AIFM from those third countries. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3).deleted
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1584 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 – paragraph 3
3. On the basis of the criteria referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 49(2), adopt implementing measures stating: (a) that the legislation on prudential regulation and ongoing supervision of AIFM in a third country is equivalent to this Directive and effectively enforced; (b) that a third country grant Community AIFM effective market access at least comparable to that granted by the Community to AIFM from that third country.deleted
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1591 #

2009/0064(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 39 - paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Notwithstanding any authorisation of AIFM established in third countries under Article 39(1) and (2), Member States may permit marketing of AIF managed by third-country AIFM in accordance with their national laws.
2010/02/18
Committee: ECON